1. with no lack of epistemic virtue, we often epistemically
warrant existential actionability (put simply, prudently
determine a choice to be a 'live' option) with normative
justifications that include neither probabilistic information
(because it is unavailable or weak) nor "justified true belief"
(because it is indeterminable or problematical) and this can be
the case even when, especially when, we're being forced to
make what are incredibly vital choices (such as those regarding
our concerns regarding ultimacies) ... all of this is to recognize,
then, that we often proceed in the light of faith
what are some of those other normative justifications?
browse this site to learn more about a pragmatic semiotic
realism
1