SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 51
Biological Effects
and Risks of Ionizing Radiation
Objectives

                         I WILL :
1. Explain the basis of radiation effects.
2. Compare radiation risks with other common risks

                      YOU WILL:
1. Know the additional cancer risk incurred from exposure
   to 25 rem.
2. Make an informed decision with respect to a personally-
   acceptable emergency radiation risk.
Sources of Information
We can’t truly perform controlled experiments so we look at
populations that were accidentally or otherwise exposed.
Radiation exposed populations include:

  Early X-ray workers
  Radium Dial Painters
  Hiroshima and Nagasaki Survivors
  Uranium Mine Workers
  Ankalosing Spondilitis
  Ringworm
  Accidents
Variation in Biological Effect

 When you are interested in knowing a relationship
 between radiation and injury, you would like to
 know such things as:

   Radiation Type
   Radiation Energy
   Part of Body Irradiated
   Dose
   Dose Rate
Stages in the
Biological Damage Process

  Damage can be broken down
  to three distinct time frames:

            Physical

           Chemical

           Biological
Biological Damage
           Physical Stage
• Radiation deposits energy
• Excess energy removes an electron from an
    atom (ionized)
•   Very quick! ~10-12 s
Biological Damage
Physical Stage - Ionization




    Charge = 0   Charge = +1 (ion)
Biological Damage
          Chemical Stage

• Ionized water can produce what are called
    “free radicals”
•   Radicals can be very reactive chemically
•   The problem occurs when it reacts with
    DNA
•   Ionization of DNA directly can also result
    in unwanted chemical reactions
•   Still very quick! ~10-7 s
DNA
Biological Damage
 Chemical Stage
Biological Damage
       Biological Stage

• Biological change reveals itself when a
  cell tries to replicate
• During replication, the cell reads the
  DNA
• What if the DNA had been damaged?!
Biological Damage
          Biological Stage
Several things can happen to irradiated cells:
      1.     Immediate death (not likely)
      2.     DNA damage could lead too:
             - death during next division
             - prevention of division
             - non-fatal mutation (What?!)
      3.     No effect!
DNA Replication
Biological Damage
         “The Big Picture”
All of these cell effects revolve around cell division.

Cells which do not divide will be resistant to radiation
damage!

The rapidly dividing cells in your body are the most
susceptible to radiation damage.

With this in mind, what tissues do you suppose are the
most sensitive to radiation?
Acute Radiation Syndromes
          Prodromal

     Hematopoietic (Blood)

        Gastrointestinal

    Central Nervous System
Prodromal Reactions
A Prodromal reaction indicates a general insult
to the body.

Can be psychosomatic, but generally indicates
that a person has received a fatal dose (+1000
rem).

Symptoms are usually seen within 30 min.

Symptoms include:
• nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea (GI)
• fatigue, listlessness, and apathy (CS)
Hematopoietic Syndrome
Blood cells are constantly regenerating in
your body. They have a lifetime of
approximately 30 days.

The two cell types which are particularly
important: - Platelets (clotting function)
     - White Blood Cells (immune function)

This syndrome is observed at doses between
300 and 800 rads.
Hematopoietic Syndrome
      Example
Gastrointestinal Syndrome
Cells which compose the lining (epithelial) of
the intestine are susceptible to radiation
damage because they are constantly dividing.

This syndrome only observed at +800 rads.

Before Chernobyl, there was only one
documented case.
Gastrointestinal Syndrome
Intestinal Epithelial Lining
Central Nervous System
         Syndrome

The dose required for this syndrome is VERY high
(+5000 rads).

Essentially, the nervous system is “shorted out”
resulting in loss of various bodily functions.

Death occurs within a few days.
Radiosensitivity of Species
            Most                                    Least
          Sensitive                                Sensitive



  Microorganisms
    Invertebrates
           Plants
            Fish
     Amphibians
           Birds
       Mammals
        Humans

                      10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000


                       Acute Dose (rad)
Partial Body Irradiation Effects
 Testies
        Temporary sterility    15 rads
        Permanent sterility    500 rads
 Ovaries
        Sterility              500 rads
 Lens
        Detectable opacities   100 rads
        Cataracts              500 rads
 Skin
        Reddening              600 rads
        Blisters               1000 rads
        Permanent hair loss    2000 rads
Problems Determining
Cancer Risk
• Why the “uncertainty”?
  • There are no specific radiation induced
      cancers.
  •   The number of people needed for such a
      study would be very large.
  •   There is little specific information on dose.
  •   There is an unlimited list of confounding
      factors.
Cancer Risk Data
      Current Data from Atomic Bomb Survivors
                                       Control Exposed Excess
                               Total   Subjects Subjects Cancers
     Number of subjects       75,991    34,272   41,719
         Leukemia               202       58      144       80
All cancers except leukemia   5,734     2,443    3,291     260
          Stomach             2,007      854     1,153      73
           Colon                232      103      129       19
            Lung                638      253      385       44
           Breast               155       57       98       22
        Urinary tract           133       49       84       19
          Myeloma                36       13       23       7
Cancer Risk Data
                                                                                           Real data
Potential Damage
    to Health




                                             is
                                        th es
                                      po                                     is
                                  y                                        es
                              H                                          th
                           ar                                   yp
                                                                     o
                      ne
                   Li                                     d
                                                              H
                                                       ol
                                                    sh
                                                 re
                                              Th

                      1 rem                                                       10 rem

Area of controversy                               Dose
Cancer Risk Coefficients

  100          100
Exposed     Unexposed
 People      People




  30            25
                          5% Risk of
 Fatal         Fatal
                          Fatal Cancer
Cancers       Cancers
Cancer Risk Coefficients

Based upon the Hiroshima and Nagasaki data,
the best estimate for risk is estimated by:

(Dose) × (0.0008) =    Risk of developing a fatal
                       cancer in your lifetime
Cancer Risk Coefficients

              Example: 25 rads

            (25) × (0.0008) = 0.02

    This means that I have a 2% chance of
developing a fatal cancer in my lifetime from a
                  25 rad dose.
So...

•   Radiation in high doses is definitely not good for
    you (>200 rads)
•   Radiation in moderate doses increases your cancer
    risk (5 - 200 rads)
•   Radiation at doses near or below background may
    (<5 rads):
       do nothing
       help you (maybe)
What You Typically Get in a Year
•   Contribution of
    various radiation
    sources to total
    average dose
    equivalent to persons
    in the United States
    (NCRP, 1987).
•   ~300 mrem
Range of Doses
Medical procedures
(per procedure)
   • CT head and body: 110
     mrem
   • Chest X-ray:
     • ~10-30 mrem
  • Abdominal X-ray:
     • ~100 mrem
Radiation Center Dose Info
• ALARA
• General Public
  • 0.1 rem per year
  • 2 mR/hr
• 5 rem Occupational
• Highest annual doses ~0.5 rem
• Typical annual dose <0.1 rem
How Risk is Measured

Risk = (measure of size of hazard) X (probability of occurrence)

                           Example:
           15X106 auto accidents in the US per year
             with 1 death for every 300 accidents.

    Risk = (15X106 accidents/yr) X (1/300 deaths/accident)
                   Risk = 50,000 deaths/yr

   Individual risk = 50,000/250,000,000 = 2X10-4/person/yr
Perceived Risk Vs. Actual Risk


Risk = (1000 accidents/yr) X (1 deaths/accident)
            Risk = 1,000 deaths/yr

 Risk = (1 accidents/yr) X (1,000 deaths/accident)
               Risk = 1,000 deaths/yr
Range of Actual Risks

Deaths/person-yr                 Interpretation

      10-2         •   Disease mortality rate
      10-3         •   Difficult to find risks of this
                       magnitude
                   •   Generally unacceptable level
                   •   If it occurs, immediate action taken to
                       reduce it
Range of Actual Risks

Deaths/person-yr                 Interpretation

      10-4         •   People less inclined to concerted
                       action
                   •   People willing to spend money to
                       reduce hazard
                   •   Safety slogans show element of fear
                       (e.g., “The life you save may be your
                       own.”)
Range of Actual Risks

Deaths/person-yr                 Interpretation

      10-5         •   People still recognize and are
                       concerned about these risks
                   •   People accept a certain level of
                       inconvenience to avoid risks at this
                       level
                   •   Safety slogans have precautionary
                       ring (e.g., “Never swim alone.”,
                       “Keep out of reach of children.”)
Range of Actual Risks
Deaths/person-yr                     Interpretation

      10-6         •   Not of great concern to the average person
                   •   Person is aware of these risks, but feels they
                       will not happen to him
                   •   Phrases associated with these hazards have
                       an element of resignation (e.g., “An act of
                       God.”)
                   •   Some feel such accidents are partly due to
                       stupidity (e.g., “Everyone knows you
                       shouldn’t stand under a tree during a
                       lightning storm.”)
Risks Which Increase the Chance of
      Death by 1/1,000,000
           Information taken from Physics and Society,
                       Vol. 19, No. 4, 1990
          Activity                          Result
   Smoking 1.4 cigarettes           Cancer, heart disease
   Drinking 0.5 l of wine             Cirrhosis of liver
Spending 1 hr in a coal mine         Black lung disease
Spending 3 hr in a coal mine              Accident
 Living 2 days in New York              Air pollution
  Traveling 6 min by canoe                Accident
Traveling 10 miles by bicycle             Accident
  Traveling 30 miles by car               Accident
  Flying 1000 miles by jet                Accident
  Flying 6000 miles by jet         Cancer from cosmic rays
Risks Which Increase the Chance of
      Death by 1/1,000,000
              Information taken from Physics and Society,
                          Vol. 19, No. 4, 1990
                  Activity                                 Result
       Living 2 months in Denver                Cancer from cosmic radiation
      Living 2 months if stone bldg             Cancer from natural radiation
    Chest X-ray taken in good hospital             Cancer from radiation
     Living 2 months with a smoker                Cancer and heart disease
    Eating 40 tblspns of peanut butter          Liver cancer from aflotoxin B
 Drinking Miami drinking water for 1 yr           Cancer from chloroform
   Drinking 30 12 oz. Cans of diet soda            Cancer from saccharin
Living 5 yrs at site boundary of nuc. plant        Cancer from radiation
Comparing the Risk
Comparing the Risk
Damage done to DNA

• DNA is made up of three parts…
    • Sugar (Ribose)
    • Base
    • Phosphate
• The information carried in DNA is
    determined by the order of the bases
•   Radiation and ions from irradiation can
    alter the order of the bases, therefore
    causing mutation or death
Damage done to DNA

• When DNA is broken, the hydrogen
    bonds between the bases are broken
•   They will then recombine in different
    orders
Damage Cells

• Cells that reproduce the fastest are
 most effected…
  • Blood
  • Skin
  • Reproductive
• Least or last effected are non-
 reproducing cells…
  • Brain
  • Nervous
Damage Cells

• There are four types of cell damage…
    • Somatic
    • Genetic
    • Directly
    • Indirectly
• Somatic is when damage appears in
    the individual exposed
•   Genetic is when damage appears in
    offspring
Damage Cells

• Direct damage is done by the radiation
    itself
•   Indirect damage is done by chemical
    changes in the cell due to free radicals
Medical Uses

• Radiation is used in the medical field…
    • X-rays
    • Radiation Therapy
    • Etc.
• X-rays are produced by hitting a
    tungsten plate with electrons, then used
    to expose film
•   Radioisotopes can be given in pill form
    or as a shot
Medical Uses

• The most common radioisotope used in
    the medical field is Tc – 99
•   Radioisotopes are chosen first by their
    half-life and energy
•   Next, expense and availability
•   People who administer radioisotopes
    are called Nuclear Medicine
    Technologists
Lethal Dose (LD)

• The LD is what is required to kill an
    individual
•   It is usually listed as LD - % of death - #
    of days
•   For example LD – 50 – 30 tells us that
    that a dose to 50% death rate in 30
    days
•   The change in dose and # of days,
    changes the death rate

More Related Content

What's hot

Acute radiation syndrome
Acute radiation syndromeAcute radiation syndrome
Acute radiation syndromeDrAyush Garg
 
radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....
radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....
radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....Koustav Majumder
 
Early effects of radiation
Early effects of radiationEarly effects of radiation
Early effects of radiationairwave12
 
2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT
2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT
2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECTHarsh Mohan
 
Ionizing radiation protection
Ionizing radiation protectionIonizing radiation protection
Ionizing radiation protectionAhmed Bahnassy
 
Radiation protection (3)
Radiation protection (3)Radiation protection (3)
Radiation protection (3)bigboss716
 
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing RadiationLecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing RadiationAlbania Energy Association
 
Ppt on radiation protection 01 final
Ppt on radiation protection 01 finalPpt on radiation protection 01 final
Ppt on radiation protection 01 finalKajal Jha
 
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Biological Effects of Ionizing RadiationBiological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiationmahbubul hassan
 
Health Effects Of Radiation Exposure
Health Effects Of Radiation ExposureHealth Effects Of Radiation Exposure
Health Effects Of Radiation Exposurefondas vakalis
 
Ionising radiation
Ionising radiationIonising radiation
Ionising radiationMike Slater
 
sources of radiation
sources of radiationsources of radiation
sources of radiationUmar Tauqir
 
Biological effects of radiation- RAVISHWAR NARAYAN
Biological effects of radiation- RAVISHWAR NARAYANBiological effects of radiation- RAVISHWAR NARAYAN
Biological effects of radiation- RAVISHWAR NARAYANRavishwar Narayan
 
Occupational radiation safety
Occupational radiation safetyOccupational radiation safety
Occupational radiation safetylekphal
 
RADIATION CARCINOGENESIS
RADIATION CARCINOGENESISRADIATION CARCINOGENESIS
RADIATION CARCINOGENESISIsha Jaiswal
 
biological effects of radiation
biological effects of radiationbiological effects of radiation
biological effects of radiationEast Sea Pro
 

What's hot (20)

Acute radiation syndrome
Acute radiation syndromeAcute radiation syndrome
Acute radiation syndrome
 
Radiation protection
Radiation protectionRadiation protection
Radiation protection
 
radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....
radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....
radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....
 
Early effects of radiation
Early effects of radiationEarly effects of radiation
Early effects of radiation
 
2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT
2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT
2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT
 
Ionizing radiation protection
Ionizing radiation protectionIonizing radiation protection
Ionizing radiation protection
 
Radiation protection (3)
Radiation protection (3)Radiation protection (3)
Radiation protection (3)
 
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing RadiationLecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
 
Basics Of Radiation
Basics Of RadiationBasics Of Radiation
Basics Of Radiation
 
Ppt on radiation protection 01 final
Ppt on radiation protection 01 finalPpt on radiation protection 01 final
Ppt on radiation protection 01 final
 
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Biological Effects of Ionizing RadiationBiological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
 
Health Effects Of Radiation Exposure
Health Effects Of Radiation ExposureHealth Effects Of Radiation Exposure
Health Effects Of Radiation Exposure
 
Basics of Radiation
Basics of RadiationBasics of Radiation
Basics of Radiation
 
Ionising radiation
Ionising radiationIonising radiation
Ionising radiation
 
sources of radiation
sources of radiationsources of radiation
sources of radiation
 
Biological effects of radiation- RAVISHWAR NARAYAN
Biological effects of radiation- RAVISHWAR NARAYANBiological effects of radiation- RAVISHWAR NARAYAN
Biological effects of radiation- RAVISHWAR NARAYAN
 
Occupational radiation safety
Occupational radiation safetyOccupational radiation safety
Occupational radiation safety
 
RADIATION CARCINOGENESIS
RADIATION CARCINOGENESISRADIATION CARCINOGENESIS
RADIATION CARCINOGENESIS
 
biological effects of radiation
biological effects of radiationbiological effects of radiation
biological effects of radiation
 
radIATION UNITS
radIATION UNITS radIATION UNITS
radIATION UNITS
 

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (8)

Radiation Biology
Radiation BiologyRadiation Biology
Radiation Biology
 
2014 radiation.
2014 radiation.2014 radiation.
2014 radiation.
 
Non ionized radiation monitoring
Non ionized radiation monitoring Non ionized radiation monitoring
Non ionized radiation monitoring
 
Radiation.ppt
Radiation.pptRadiation.ppt
Radiation.ppt
 
Slide share
Slide shareSlide share
Slide share
 
Radiation ppt
Radiation pptRadiation ppt
Radiation ppt
 
موقع سلايد شير
موقع سلايد شيرموقع سلايد شير
موقع سلايد شير
 
Radiation Protection
Radiation ProtectionRadiation Protection
Radiation Protection
 

Similar to Biological Effects and Cancer Risks of Ionizing Radiation

Radiation effects
Radiation effectsRadiation effects
Radiation effectsnobuggingme
 
Lim Jus494 Nucleartechnology
Lim Jus494 NucleartechnologyLim Jus494 Nucleartechnology
Lim Jus494 Nucleartechnologymerlyna
 
001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf
001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf
001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdfcochachi
 
Lim Jus494 Nuclear
Lim Jus494 NuclearLim Jus494 Nuclear
Lim Jus494 Nuclearmerlyna
 
How might basic research on low dose ionizing radiation influence future radi...
How might basic research on low dose ionizing radiation influence future radi...How might basic research on low dose ionizing radiation influence future radi...
How might basic research on low dose ionizing radiation influence future radi...Leishman Associates
 
Ionizing Radiation & Health
Ionizing Radiation & HealthIonizing Radiation & Health
Ionizing Radiation & HealthAlok Kumar
 
Radiation and Medical Imaging
Radiation and Medical ImagingRadiation and Medical Imaging
Radiation and Medical ImagingBhavin Jankharia
 
Dental Radiation Protection .pptx
Dental Radiation Protection .pptxDental Radiation Protection .pptx
Dental Radiation Protection .pptxOsama Albedaiwi
 
Elimination of occupational cancer from hazardous substances
Elimination of occupational cancer from hazardous substancesElimination of occupational cancer from hazardous substances
Elimination of occupational cancer from hazardous substancesRetired
 
마더세이프라운드 radiation dose[윤석남 교수]
마더세이프라운드 radiation dose[윤석남 교수]마더세이프라운드 radiation dose[윤석남 교수]
마더세이프라운드 radiation dose[윤석남 교수]mothersafe
 
Radiation Therapy 101.5&quot;-ONS Talk Jan2009
Radiation Therapy 101.5&quot;-ONS Talk Jan2009Radiation Therapy 101.5&quot;-ONS Talk Jan2009
Radiation Therapy 101.5&quot;-ONS Talk Jan2009Spectrum Health
 
Coping with low dose radiation in fukushima, doss, samrai2014, 3-24-2015
Coping with low dose radiation in fukushima, doss, samrai2014, 3-24-2015Coping with low dose radiation in fukushima, doss, samrai2014, 3-24-2015
Coping with low dose radiation in fukushima, doss, samrai2014, 3-24-2015Mohan Doss
 
Chemicals, Cancer & You
Chemicals, Cancer & You Chemicals, Cancer & You
Chemicals, Cancer & You v2zq
 
Chemicals, cancer, and you fs
Chemicals, cancer, and you fsChemicals, cancer, and you fs
Chemicals, cancer, and you fsTap Bayy Ga
 
Use of radiation in medicine (medical use of radiation)
Use of radiation in medicine (medical use of radiation)Use of radiation in medicine (medical use of radiation)
Use of radiation in medicine (medical use of radiation)Dr Arvind Shukla
 
Radiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pk
Radiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pkRadiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pk
Radiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pkDr pradeep Kumar
 

Similar to Biological Effects and Cancer Risks of Ionizing Radiation (20)

Radiation effects
Radiation effectsRadiation effects
Radiation effects
 
Lim Jus494 Nucleartechnology
Lim Jus494 NucleartechnologyLim Jus494 Nucleartechnology
Lim Jus494 Nucleartechnology
 
001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf
001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf
001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf
 
Lim Jus494 Nuclear
Lim Jus494 NuclearLim Jus494 Nuclear
Lim Jus494 Nuclear
 
Radiation Hazards
Radiation HazardsRadiation Hazards
Radiation Hazards
 
How might basic research on low dose ionizing radiation influence future radi...
How might basic research on low dose ionizing radiation influence future radi...How might basic research on low dose ionizing radiation influence future radi...
How might basic research on low dose ionizing radiation influence future radi...
 
Ionizing Radiation & Health
Ionizing Radiation & HealthIonizing Radiation & Health
Ionizing Radiation & Health
 
Alara 2 0
Alara 2 0Alara 2 0
Alara 2 0
 
Radiation and Medical Imaging
Radiation and Medical ImagingRadiation and Medical Imaging
Radiation and Medical Imaging
 
Dental Radiation Protection .pptx
Dental Radiation Protection .pptxDental Radiation Protection .pptx
Dental Radiation Protection .pptx
 
Elimination of occupational cancer from hazardous substances
Elimination of occupational cancer from hazardous substancesElimination of occupational cancer from hazardous substances
Elimination of occupational cancer from hazardous substances
 
Biodosimetry
BiodosimetryBiodosimetry
Biodosimetry
 
마더세이프라운드 radiation dose[윤석남 교수]
마더세이프라운드 radiation dose[윤석남 교수]마더세이프라운드 radiation dose[윤석남 교수]
마더세이프라운드 radiation dose[윤석남 교수]
 
Radiation Therapy 101.5&quot;-ONS Talk Jan2009
Radiation Therapy 101.5&quot;-ONS Talk Jan2009Radiation Therapy 101.5&quot;-ONS Talk Jan2009
Radiation Therapy 101.5&quot;-ONS Talk Jan2009
 
Coping with low dose radiation in fukushima, doss, samrai2014, 3-24-2015
Coping with low dose radiation in fukushima, doss, samrai2014, 3-24-2015Coping with low dose radiation in fukushima, doss, samrai2014, 3-24-2015
Coping with low dose radiation in fukushima, doss, samrai2014, 3-24-2015
 
Chemicals, Cancer & You
Chemicals, Cancer & You Chemicals, Cancer & You
Chemicals, Cancer & You
 
Chemicals, cancer, and you fs
Chemicals, cancer, and you fsChemicals, cancer, and you fs
Chemicals, cancer, and you fs
 
Use of radiation in medicine (medical use of radiation)
Use of radiation in medicine (medical use of radiation)Use of radiation in medicine (medical use of radiation)
Use of radiation in medicine (medical use of radiation)
 
Radiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pk
Radiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pkRadiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pk
Radiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pk
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
 

More from jmocherman

Section 2 presentation
Section 2 presentationSection 2 presentation
Section 2 presentationjmocherman
 
What is radiation
What is radiationWhat is radiation
What is radiationjmocherman
 
Section 2 part 1
Section 2 part 1Section 2 part 1
Section 2 part 1jmocherman
 
Radiation section 2
Radiation section 2Radiation section 2
Radiation section 2jmocherman
 
Radiation reactors
Radiation reactorsRadiation reactors
Radiation reactorsjmocherman
 
Radiation general
Radiation generalRadiation general
Radiation generaljmocherman
 
Radiation detectors
Radiation detectorsRadiation detectors
Radiation detectorsjmocherman
 
Radiation chart of nuclides
Radiation chart of nuclidesRadiation chart of nuclides
Radiation chart of nuclidesjmocherman
 
Phosphate mining
Phosphate miningPhosphate mining
Phosphate miningjmocherman
 
Getting inside the atom part 2
Getting inside the atom part 2Getting inside the atom part 2
Getting inside the atom part 2jmocherman
 
Getting inside the atom part 1
Getting inside the atom part 1Getting inside the atom part 1
Getting inside the atom part 1jmocherman
 

More from jmocherman (13)

Section 2 presentation
Section 2 presentationSection 2 presentation
Section 2 presentation
 
What is radiation
What is radiationWhat is radiation
What is radiation
 
Section 2 part 1
Section 2 part 1Section 2 part 1
Section 2 part 1
 
Radiation
RadiationRadiation
Radiation
 
Radiation section 2
Radiation section 2Radiation section 2
Radiation section 2
 
Radiation reactors
Radiation reactorsRadiation reactors
Radiation reactors
 
Radiation general
Radiation generalRadiation general
Radiation general
 
Radiation detectors
Radiation detectorsRadiation detectors
Radiation detectors
 
Radiation chart of nuclides
Radiation chart of nuclidesRadiation chart of nuclides
Radiation chart of nuclides
 
Ppd jeopardy
Ppd jeopardyPpd jeopardy
Ppd jeopardy
 
Phosphate mining
Phosphate miningPhosphate mining
Phosphate mining
 
Getting inside the atom part 2
Getting inside the atom part 2Getting inside the atom part 2
Getting inside the atom part 2
 
Getting inside the atom part 1
Getting inside the atom part 1Getting inside the atom part 1
Getting inside the atom part 1
 

Biological Effects and Cancer Risks of Ionizing Radiation

  • 1. Biological Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation
  • 2. Objectives I WILL : 1. Explain the basis of radiation effects. 2. Compare radiation risks with other common risks YOU WILL: 1. Know the additional cancer risk incurred from exposure to 25 rem. 2. Make an informed decision with respect to a personally- acceptable emergency radiation risk.
  • 3. Sources of Information We can’t truly perform controlled experiments so we look at populations that were accidentally or otherwise exposed. Radiation exposed populations include: Early X-ray workers Radium Dial Painters Hiroshima and Nagasaki Survivors Uranium Mine Workers Ankalosing Spondilitis Ringworm Accidents
  • 4. Variation in Biological Effect When you are interested in knowing a relationship between radiation and injury, you would like to know such things as: Radiation Type Radiation Energy Part of Body Irradiated Dose Dose Rate
  • 5. Stages in the Biological Damage Process Damage can be broken down to three distinct time frames: Physical Chemical Biological
  • 6. Biological Damage Physical Stage • Radiation deposits energy • Excess energy removes an electron from an atom (ionized) • Very quick! ~10-12 s
  • 7. Biological Damage Physical Stage - Ionization Charge = 0 Charge = +1 (ion)
  • 8. Biological Damage Chemical Stage • Ionized water can produce what are called “free radicals” • Radicals can be very reactive chemically • The problem occurs when it reacts with DNA • Ionization of DNA directly can also result in unwanted chemical reactions • Still very quick! ~10-7 s
  • 9. DNA
  • 11. Biological Damage Biological Stage • Biological change reveals itself when a cell tries to replicate • During replication, the cell reads the DNA • What if the DNA had been damaged?!
  • 12. Biological Damage Biological Stage Several things can happen to irradiated cells: 1. Immediate death (not likely) 2. DNA damage could lead too: - death during next division - prevention of division - non-fatal mutation (What?!) 3. No effect!
  • 14. Biological Damage “The Big Picture” All of these cell effects revolve around cell division. Cells which do not divide will be resistant to radiation damage! The rapidly dividing cells in your body are the most susceptible to radiation damage. With this in mind, what tissues do you suppose are the most sensitive to radiation?
  • 15. Acute Radiation Syndromes Prodromal Hematopoietic (Blood) Gastrointestinal Central Nervous System
  • 16. Prodromal Reactions A Prodromal reaction indicates a general insult to the body. Can be psychosomatic, but generally indicates that a person has received a fatal dose (+1000 rem). Symptoms are usually seen within 30 min. Symptoms include: • nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea (GI) • fatigue, listlessness, and apathy (CS)
  • 17. Hematopoietic Syndrome Blood cells are constantly regenerating in your body. They have a lifetime of approximately 30 days. The two cell types which are particularly important: - Platelets (clotting function) - White Blood Cells (immune function) This syndrome is observed at doses between 300 and 800 rads.
  • 19. Gastrointestinal Syndrome Cells which compose the lining (epithelial) of the intestine are susceptible to radiation damage because they are constantly dividing. This syndrome only observed at +800 rads. Before Chernobyl, there was only one documented case.
  • 21. Central Nervous System Syndrome The dose required for this syndrome is VERY high (+5000 rads). Essentially, the nervous system is “shorted out” resulting in loss of various bodily functions. Death occurs within a few days.
  • 22. Radiosensitivity of Species Most Least Sensitive Sensitive Microorganisms Invertebrates Plants Fish Amphibians Birds Mammals Humans 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000 Acute Dose (rad)
  • 23. Partial Body Irradiation Effects Testies Temporary sterility 15 rads Permanent sterility 500 rads Ovaries Sterility 500 rads Lens Detectable opacities 100 rads Cataracts 500 rads Skin Reddening 600 rads Blisters 1000 rads Permanent hair loss 2000 rads
  • 24. Problems Determining Cancer Risk • Why the “uncertainty”? • There are no specific radiation induced cancers. • The number of people needed for such a study would be very large. • There is little specific information on dose. • There is an unlimited list of confounding factors.
  • 25. Cancer Risk Data Current Data from Atomic Bomb Survivors Control Exposed Excess Total Subjects Subjects Cancers Number of subjects 75,991 34,272 41,719 Leukemia 202 58 144 80 All cancers except leukemia 5,734 2,443 3,291 260 Stomach 2,007 854 1,153 73 Colon 232 103 129 19 Lung 638 253 385 44 Breast 155 57 98 22 Urinary tract 133 49 84 19 Myeloma 36 13 23 7
  • 26. Cancer Risk Data Real data Potential Damage to Health is th es po is y es H th ar yp o ne Li d H ol sh re Th 1 rem 10 rem Area of controversy Dose
  • 27. Cancer Risk Coefficients 100 100 Exposed Unexposed People People 30 25 5% Risk of Fatal Fatal Fatal Cancer Cancers Cancers
  • 28. Cancer Risk Coefficients Based upon the Hiroshima and Nagasaki data, the best estimate for risk is estimated by: (Dose) × (0.0008) = Risk of developing a fatal cancer in your lifetime
  • 29. Cancer Risk Coefficients Example: 25 rads (25) × (0.0008) = 0.02 This means that I have a 2% chance of developing a fatal cancer in my lifetime from a 25 rad dose.
  • 30. So... • Radiation in high doses is definitely not good for you (>200 rads) • Radiation in moderate doses increases your cancer risk (5 - 200 rads) • Radiation at doses near or below background may (<5 rads): do nothing help you (maybe)
  • 31. What You Typically Get in a Year • Contribution of various radiation sources to total average dose equivalent to persons in the United States (NCRP, 1987). • ~300 mrem
  • 32. Range of Doses Medical procedures (per procedure) • CT head and body: 110 mrem • Chest X-ray: • ~10-30 mrem • Abdominal X-ray: • ~100 mrem
  • 33. Radiation Center Dose Info • ALARA • General Public • 0.1 rem per year • 2 mR/hr • 5 rem Occupational • Highest annual doses ~0.5 rem • Typical annual dose <0.1 rem
  • 34. How Risk is Measured Risk = (measure of size of hazard) X (probability of occurrence) Example: 15X106 auto accidents in the US per year with 1 death for every 300 accidents. Risk = (15X106 accidents/yr) X (1/300 deaths/accident) Risk = 50,000 deaths/yr Individual risk = 50,000/250,000,000 = 2X10-4/person/yr
  • 35. Perceived Risk Vs. Actual Risk Risk = (1000 accidents/yr) X (1 deaths/accident) Risk = 1,000 deaths/yr Risk = (1 accidents/yr) X (1,000 deaths/accident) Risk = 1,000 deaths/yr
  • 36. Range of Actual Risks Deaths/person-yr Interpretation 10-2 • Disease mortality rate 10-3 • Difficult to find risks of this magnitude • Generally unacceptable level • If it occurs, immediate action taken to reduce it
  • 37. Range of Actual Risks Deaths/person-yr Interpretation 10-4 • People less inclined to concerted action • People willing to spend money to reduce hazard • Safety slogans show element of fear (e.g., “The life you save may be your own.”)
  • 38. Range of Actual Risks Deaths/person-yr Interpretation 10-5 • People still recognize and are concerned about these risks • People accept a certain level of inconvenience to avoid risks at this level • Safety slogans have precautionary ring (e.g., “Never swim alone.”, “Keep out of reach of children.”)
  • 39. Range of Actual Risks Deaths/person-yr Interpretation 10-6 • Not of great concern to the average person • Person is aware of these risks, but feels they will not happen to him • Phrases associated with these hazards have an element of resignation (e.g., “An act of God.”) • Some feel such accidents are partly due to stupidity (e.g., “Everyone knows you shouldn’t stand under a tree during a lightning storm.”)
  • 40. Risks Which Increase the Chance of Death by 1/1,000,000 Information taken from Physics and Society, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1990 Activity Result Smoking 1.4 cigarettes Cancer, heart disease Drinking 0.5 l of wine Cirrhosis of liver Spending 1 hr in a coal mine Black lung disease Spending 3 hr in a coal mine Accident Living 2 days in New York Air pollution Traveling 6 min by canoe Accident Traveling 10 miles by bicycle Accident Traveling 30 miles by car Accident Flying 1000 miles by jet Accident Flying 6000 miles by jet Cancer from cosmic rays
  • 41. Risks Which Increase the Chance of Death by 1/1,000,000 Information taken from Physics and Society, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1990 Activity Result Living 2 months in Denver Cancer from cosmic radiation Living 2 months if stone bldg Cancer from natural radiation Chest X-ray taken in good hospital Cancer from radiation Living 2 months with a smoker Cancer and heart disease Eating 40 tblspns of peanut butter Liver cancer from aflotoxin B Drinking Miami drinking water for 1 yr Cancer from chloroform Drinking 30 12 oz. Cans of diet soda Cancer from saccharin Living 5 yrs at site boundary of nuc. plant Cancer from radiation
  • 44. Damage done to DNA • DNA is made up of three parts… • Sugar (Ribose) • Base • Phosphate • The information carried in DNA is determined by the order of the bases • Radiation and ions from irradiation can alter the order of the bases, therefore causing mutation or death
  • 45. Damage done to DNA • When DNA is broken, the hydrogen bonds between the bases are broken • They will then recombine in different orders
  • 46. Damage Cells • Cells that reproduce the fastest are most effected… • Blood • Skin • Reproductive • Least or last effected are non- reproducing cells… • Brain • Nervous
  • 47. Damage Cells • There are four types of cell damage… • Somatic • Genetic • Directly • Indirectly • Somatic is when damage appears in the individual exposed • Genetic is when damage appears in offspring
  • 48. Damage Cells • Direct damage is done by the radiation itself • Indirect damage is done by chemical changes in the cell due to free radicals
  • 49. Medical Uses • Radiation is used in the medical field… • X-rays • Radiation Therapy • Etc. • X-rays are produced by hitting a tungsten plate with electrons, then used to expose film • Radioisotopes can be given in pill form or as a shot
  • 50. Medical Uses • The most common radioisotope used in the medical field is Tc – 99 • Radioisotopes are chosen first by their half-life and energy • Next, expense and availability • People who administer radioisotopes are called Nuclear Medicine Technologists
  • 51. Lethal Dose (LD) • The LD is what is required to kill an individual • It is usually listed as LD - % of death - # of days • For example LD – 50 – 30 tells us that that a dose to 50% death rate in 30 days • The change in dose and # of days, changes the death rate