David Grove was a master of seizing the moment, turning a slip into an opportunity, the mundane into the sacred, the bizarre into the extraordinary, the idiosyncratic into the optimal. How? By being antifragile. It didn't matter what the client said or did David made use of it in their best interest. He loved ambiguity, mis-hearings, puns, non sequiturs and synchronicity. David facilitated from 'the edge of chaos’ – that thin strip of existence between order and randomness where life and creativity thrive.
After David Grove died in 2008, the person who has most influenced Penny Tompkins and my thinking is Nassim Nicholas Taleb. His first book, Fooled By Randomness exposed the challenge we have understanding the effects of chance. He followed this with The Black Swan, which showed why large-scale but rare and unpredictable events have a much greater effect than all the small, common and predictable events put together. Taleb's most recent book, Antifragile, goes further. It explores how it is possible to be more than resilient, to make non-predictive decisions under uncertainty, and to relate to the unknown without attempting to understand or control it.
Learning by avoiding mistakes is fragile. Learning by trial and error is robust. Learning by trial and feedback is antifragile.
But what does this have to Symbolic Modelling and other clean approaches? Just about everything.
As facilitators we have to make many quick decisions. Decisions based on top-down theoretical methodologies are fragile. Decisions that use experience-based heuristics are robust. And there is an antifragile class of bottom-up decision making that relies on serendipity, mistakes, the unexpected, and stochastic tinkering. My metaphor for this is it's like surfing blind.
And Taleb's ideas are not just useful to facilitators. I think you will see they have much to say about everyday life as well.
If you would like some reading from the man himself, Taleb has kindly made the prologue of his new book available as a free download:
http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/prologue.pdf
1. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Clean Conference 2013
!
Antifragility,
Black Swans
and
Befriending
Uncertainty
!
James Lawley
1
2. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Presentation Preamble
!
David Grove was a master of seizing the moment, turning a slip into an opportunity, the mundane into the sacred, the bizarre into
the extraordinary, the idiosyncratic into the optimal. How? By being antifragile. It didn't matter what the client said or did David
made use of it in their best interest. He loved ambiguity, mis-hearings, puns, non sequiturs and synchronicity. David facilitated
from 'the edge of chaos’ – that thin strip of existence between order and randomness where life and creativity thrive.
!
After David Grove died in 2008, the person who has most influenced Penny Tompkins and my thinking is Nassim Nicholas Taleb.
His first book, Fooled By Randomness exposed the challenge we have understanding the effects of chance. He followed this with
The Black Swan, which showed why large-scale but rare and unpredictable events have a much greater effect than all the small,
common and predictable events put together. Taleb's most recent book, Antifragile, goes further. It explores how it is possible to
be more than resilient, to make non-predictive decisions under uncertainty, and to relate to the unknown without attempting to
understand or control it.
!
Learning by avoiding mistakes is fragile. Learning by trial and error is robust. Learning by trial and feedback is antifragile.
!
But what does this have to Symbolic Modelling and other clean approaches? Just about everything. As facilitators we have to
make many quick decisions. Decisions based on top-down theoretical methodologies are fragile. Decisions that use experience-
based heuristics are robust. And there is an antifragile class of bottom-up decision making that relies on serendipity, mistakes,
the unexpected, and stochastic tinkering. My metaphor for this is it's like surfing blind.
!
And Taleb's ideas are not just useful to facilitators. I think you will see they have much to say about everyday life as well.
!
If you would like some preparatory reading, Taleb has kindly made the prologue of his new book available as a free download:
http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/prologue.pdf
2
3. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Wind extinguishes a candle and energizes fire.
Likewise with randomness, uncertainty, chaos:
you want to use them, not hide from them.
!
You want to be the fire and wish for the wind.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.3
3
5. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
There is no word for
the exact opposite of
fragile.
!
Let us call it
antifragile.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.3
5
6. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Antifragility and fragility
are degrees on a spectrum.
!
FRAGILE ---- ROBUST --- ANTIFRAGILE
Taleb, Antifragile, p.4
6
7. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Antifragility is beyond resilience or robustness.
!
The resilient resists shocks
and stays the same;
!
the antifragile gets better.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.3
7
8. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Anatomy of Fragile - Robust - Antifragile Systems
Taleb, Antifragile, p.426
8
10. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Post traumatic growth - the opposite of PTSD.
!
Those from whom we have benefitted the most
aren’t those who have tried to help us
(say with “advice”)
but rather those who have actively tried
– but eventually failed – to harm us
Taleb, Antifragile, p.53
10
11. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Antifragile headline message to Malaysian
government in online newspaper, Nutgraph:
!
“You do your worst. We’ll do our best.”
Dr. Soong Kua
!
Lawley, 2013
11
12. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
The antifragile loves
randomness and uncertainty,
!
which also means – crucially –
a love of a certain class of errors.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.4
12
13. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Fragility and antifragility
are part of the current property
of an object [or] system.
!
[i.e. the capacity to respond
to unspecified future events.]
Taleb, Antifragile, p.9
13
14. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Antifragility has a singular property
of allowing us to deal with the unknown,
to do things without understanding them –
and to do them well.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.4
14
15. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
[Antifragility is needed]
anywhere the unknown preponderates,
any situation in which there is randomness,
unpredictability, opacity,
or incomplete understanding of things.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.4
15
16. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
By grasping the mechanisms of antigratility we
can build a systematic and broad guide to
nonpredictive decision making
under uncertainty.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.4
16
17. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
The fragile wants tranquility.
!
The antifragile grows from disorder,
!
the robust doesn’t care too much..
Taleb, Antifragile, p.20
17
18. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
It is far easier to figure out
if something is fragile
than to predict the occurrence
of an event that may harm it.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.4
18
19. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Fragility can be measured;
!
risk is not measurable.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.4
19
20. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
When it comes to random events,
“robust” is certainly not good enough.
!
we need a mechanism by which a system
regenerates itself continuously
by using, rather than suffering from,
random events, unpredictable shocks,
stressors, and volatility.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.8
20
21. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Black Swans
are large-scale unpredictable
and irregular events
of massive consequence.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.6
21
22. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Most of history
comes from Black Swan events,
!
while we worry about fine-tuning
our understanding of the ordinary.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.6
22
23. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Black Swans hijack our brains,
because they are retrospectively explainable.
!
We don’t realize the role of Swans
because of this illusion of predictability.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.6
23
24. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Robust or resilient
is neither harmed nor helped
by volatility and disorder,
!
while the antifragile benefits from them.
!
Taleb, Antifragile, p.17
24
25. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Ovid [said]
difficulty is what wakes up the genius.
!
Taleb, Antifragile, p.42
25
26. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Antifragility is the property of all those natural
(and complex) systems that have survived,
!
depriving these systems of the volatility,
randomness, and stressors will harm them.
!
They will weaken, die, or blow up.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.5
26
27. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Much of our modern, structured, world
has been harming us with
top-down policies and contraptions
!
– an insult to the antifragility of systems.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.5
27
28. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Everything top-down
fragilizes and blocks antifragility and growth,
!
everything bottom-up
thrives under the right amount
of stress and disorder.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.5
28
29. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Taleb, Antifragile, pp.23-27
Fragile Robust Antifragile
Systems Efficiency, optimized
Component
Redundancy
Functional Redundancy
Regulation Rules Principles Virtue
Knowledge Academia Expertise Erudition
Science Theory Phenomenology
Evidenced-based
phenomenology
Research Directed research
Opportunistic
research
Stochastic tinkering
Errors
Hates mistakes. Large,
rare errors => blowups
Mistakes are just
information
Loves reversible,
small errors.
Black Swan
Exposed to negative
Black Swans
Exposed to +ve Black
Swans - maximizes
serendipity.
29
30. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Taleb, Antifragile, pp.23-27
Fragile Robust Antifragile
General Large Small but specialized Small but not specialized
Ethics No skin in the game Skin in the game Soul in the game
Human body
Mollification,
atrophy
Recovery Hormesis
Human
relationships
Friendship Kinship Attraction
Psychology
Post-traumatic
stress
Post-traumatic growth
Economic life
Bureaucrat.
Academic.
Corporate
executive. Politician.
Owner occupier.
Truck driver.
Postal employee.
Entrepreneur.
Taxi driver.
Artist. Writer.
30
31. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
The process of discovery
(or innovation, or technological progress)
itself depends on antifragile tinkering,
rather than formal education.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.5
31
32. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Complex systems are full of
hard to detect interdependencies –
and nonlinear responses.
!
“Nonlinear”
means simple causal associations
are misplaced
Taleb, Antifragile, p.7
32
33. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
“Sadly, there are no effective methods for
solving general nonlinear problems.
!
Even simple looking problems with a few
variables can be extremely challenging.”
Convex Optimization, Stephen Boyd, Lieven Vandenberghe p.11
33
34. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
However,
“There are some simple heuristics, based on
convex optimization,
that often finds fairly sparse solutions.”
Convex Optimization, Stephen Boyd, Lieven Vandenberghe p.11
34
35. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
First find a general solution using
“global optimization” -
that may be non-optimal but it creates a
starting point for a “local optimisation”.
i.e. get in the right ballpark first and then
workout how to find your seat.
Be prepared to compromise efficiency to
maximise effectiveness.
i.e. hold back from fully solving the problem.
Convex Optimization, Stephen Boyd, Lieven Vandenberghe p.11
35
36. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
A complex system
does not require complicated systems
and regulations and intricate policies.
The simpler, the better.
Complications [and interventions] lead to
multiplicative chains of unanticipated effects.
!
Less is more and usually more effective.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.11
36
37. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
Complex systems are not understandable.
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
Don’t try –
Avoid interfering with what
you don’t understand.
37
38. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
Complex systems are not understandable.
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
Don’t try –
Avoid theories, in the absence of
local evidence use tried & tested heuristics.
38
39. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
There is always enough happening.
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
You don’t need to add anything
39
40. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
There is always enough happening.
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
You don’t need to make anything happen.
40
41. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
In complex systems,
“causes” are usually impossible to isolate
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
Don’t try –
Pay attention to the pattern in the signs
41
42. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
People & Systems are complex enough
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
Make minimal interventions
42
43. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
People & Systems are complex enough
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
Keep your interventions simple.
43
44. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
Top-down interventions fragilize
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
Use bottom-up approaches
44
45. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
Complex systems are not predictable.
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
Don’t try –
Use nonpredictive decision-making.
45
46. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
Complex systems are not predictable.
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
Don’t try –
Use stochastic tinkering
(Iterative trial and feedback)
46
47. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
Complex systems are not predictable.
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
Don’t try –
Maximise serendipity.
47
48. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
Complex systems are not predictable.
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
Don’t try –
Develop a ‘nose’ for potential change.
48
49. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
Complex systems are not predictable.
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
Don’t try –
Utilise opportunities resulting
from ‘errors’ and ‘mistakes’.
49
50. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
Fixed goals and plans fragilize.
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
Cultivate conditions
and respond to what happens.
50
51. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
PRINCIPLE:
Fixed goals and plans fragilize.
Lawley, 2013
PRACTICE:
Work with dynamic reference points.
51
54. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Simplicity is not so simple to attain.
!
Steve Jobs figured out that
“you have to work hard to get your thinking
clean and to make it simple”.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.11
54
55. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Symbolic Modelling involves working with
emergent properties, fuzzy categories,
apparently illogical causal relations, multiple
levels of simultaneous and systemic processes,
iterative cycles and unexpected twists and
turns. In short, especially during the early
stages, the client’s information is intrinsically
unpredictable and messy.
Lawley & Tompkins, Metaphors in Mind, p.46
55
56. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
FACILITATORS NEED TO OPERATE FROM
A STATE OF ‘NOT KNOWING’
Lawley & Tompkins, Metaphors in Mind, p.45
56
57. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
While clients always have
the capacity to change and evolve,
when, how and why
a particular Metaphor Landscape reorganises
is inherently indeterminate.
Lawley & Tompkins, Metaphors in Mind, p.45-46
57
58. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
IS THERE A RELATIONSHIP?
Lawley
Fragile
No desire
for change
Problem
Robust
Desire to
return to
‘normal’
Remedy
Antifragile
Desire to
create
something new
Outcome
58
59. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Novice
Expert
Competent
Proficient
Beginner
Rule-based
Techniques
Top-down
Modelling
Bottom-up
Modelling
The Dreyfus and Dreyfus ‘Novice to Expert’ Model
Lawley, 2006
59
60. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
[There is often a] tradeoff between
the antifragility of the collective
and the fragility of the individual.
!
[i.e. between the symbol and the landscape]
Taleb, Antifragile, p.18
60
61. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Antifragilizing Groups - I
!
Recruit people who:
- Have a track record
- Encourage others
- Like experimenting & feedback
- Are cross-domain thinkers
- Are open to learn this approach
Lawley, 2013
61
62. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Antifragilizing Groups - II
!
Cultivate conditions that:
- Maximise serendioity
- Foster the following of hunches
- Encourage small failures
- Increase connectivity of diverse thinkers
- Apply to all levels of organisation
- Apply code congruency
Lawley, 2013
62
63. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
A Model for Maxising Serendipity
Lawley, 2008
63
E+1
Recognise
Potential
E
Unexpected
Event
E-1
Prepared
Mind
E+2
Seize the
Moment
E+3
Amplify
Effects
E+4
Evaluate
Effects
Iterative circularity
64. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
Layers of redundancy are the central risk
management property of natural systems
!
Redundancy is ambiguous because it seems
like a waste if nothing happens.
!
Except that something unusual happens –
usually.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.44 & 45
64
65. James Lawley, Antifragility, Clean Conference 2013
To dare to look our ignorance in the face
and be aggressively and proudly human
may require some structural changes.
Taleb, Antifragile, p.11
65