Lightroom Workflow Intro
•Transferir como ZIP, PDF•
2 gostaram•4,235 visualizações
An introduction to basic workflow concepts, and why to use Lightroom over Aperture.
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Último
Último (20)
Destaque
Destaque (20)
Lightroom Workflow Intro
- 1. Workflow 2.0 Introduction to Adobe LIghtroom Monday, March 2, 2009
- 2. Workflow 2.0 Introduction to Adobe LIghtroom adobe.com/lightroom and Please go to: download the lightroom trial. If you don’t have an Adobe ID, User: donewmedia@gmail.com Pass: supho Monday, March 2, 2009
- 3. (I’m not too conceded but…) Monday, March 2, 2009
- 4. (I’m not too conceded but…) None of you are like me. Monday, March 2, 2009
- 5. Monday, March 2, 2009
- 6. workflow application. Not a Monday, March 2, 2009
- 7. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 8. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 9. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 10. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 11. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 12. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 13. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 14. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 15. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 16. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 17. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 18. Workflow 1.0 Workflow 1.5 Workflow 2.0 Monday, March 2, 2009
- 19. Workflow 1.0 Workflow 1.5 Workflow 2.0 Monday, March 2, 2009
- 20. Workflow 1.0 Workflow 1.5 Workflow 2.0 Monday, March 2, 2009
- 21. Workflow 1.0 Workflow 1.5 Workflow 2.0 Monday, March 2, 2009
- 22. What we’re gonna miss from Aperture Monday, March 2, 2009
- 23. Paneled interface Monday, March 2, 2009
- 24. The loupe tool Monday, March 2, 2009
- 25. OS integration Monday, March 2, 2009
- 26. Backups are easy Monday, March 2, 2009
- 27. Already said it, but: stacks! Monday, March 2, 2009
- 28. Light Table Monday, March 2, 2009
- 29. It’s Apple, It’s Shiny Monday, March 2, 2009
- 30. So, why lightroom? Monday, March 2, 2009
- 31. ‘Cause: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 32. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 33. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 34. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 35. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 36. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 37. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 38. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 39. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 40. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 41. Monday, March 2, 2009
- 42. Monday, March 2, 2009
Notas do Editor
- How many of you: Shoot Nikon? Use a Mac? Shoot RAW? Are anal about file names? Are in love with metadata? Would rather do things the correct way, then the fast way?
- Who doesn’t love photoshop? – it’s great for editing your photos and doing PIXEL MANIPULATION
- Who doesn’t love photoshop? – it’s great for editing your photos and doing PIXEL MANIPULATION
- Who doesn’t love photoshop? – it’s great for editing your photos and doing PIXEL MANIPULATION
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!