The objective of the IOTC is to promote cooperation among its Members to ensure, through appropriate management, the conservation and optimum utilization of stocks covered by the Agreement and to encourage sustainable development of related fisheries
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 4
Good Practices with Regional Management Bodies: Case of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
1. Good Practices with Regional
Management Bodies: Case of the
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
Rondolph PAYET
Executive Secretary
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission
2. Established in 1996 , it is the only RFMO based in the IO, and
the only tuna RFMO under the FAO of United Nations
framework.
Headquarters – based in Victoria, Seychelles
31 full Member States and 2 Cooperating States
Most of the tuna fishing nations are members (over 80-90%
of the catch).
The objective of the IOTC is to promote cooperation
among its Members to ensure, through appropriate
management, the conservation and optimum utilization
of stocks covered by the Agreement and to encourage
sustainable development of related fisheries
Performance review (2nd
)
IOTC
3. Decisions are binding by majority rule.
Decisions (Resolutions) taken collectively but
implemented at national Level.
Objection procedures
• Most CMMs adopted by the IOTC apply throughout the
entire competence area, including coastal State EEZs, and
thus potentially affect coastal States’ sovereign rights
over the living resources in their EEZs as the CMM in some
way or another restrict fishing activities.
Countries must translate the Resolutions in national laws.
Members make contribution's to the organisation ( GDP,
Catch level, development status)
Carry out capacity building activities
IOTC
4. The structure of IOTC
Commission
(31+2 Member States decide
on actions)
Scientific
Committee
(advise on
status)
Scientific
Committee
(advise on
status)
Compliance
Committee
(advise on
enforcement)
Compliance
Committee
(advise on
enforcement)
Working Groups
(scientific analysis)
•Tropical Tunas
•Billfish
•Temperate Tunas
•Ecosystems
•Data Collection
•Methods
Working Groups
(scientific analysis)
•Tropical Tunas
•Billfish
•Temperate Tunas
•Ecosystems
•Data Collection
•Methods
Secretariat
(support all
processes at all
levels
IGO and NGOIGO and NGO
5.
6. • Yellowfin, skipjack, bigeye, albacore tunas
and swordfish the main species.
•Neritic tunas important at a sub-regional
level.
•16 Species in total + sharks, seasbirds,
whales ( associated species).
• Virtually all the transboundary stocks of
importance in the IO.
• About 40% of catches in the high-seas.
What are the species under IOTC
mandate?
11. •Evaluation of uncertainty in the
stock status, development of
robust management strategies.
•Precautionary approach
•Incorporating ecosystem
considerations into management
decisions.
•The development Management
Strategy Evaluation for Harvest
Control Rules.
Better science to guide decision making:
12. What is Management Strategy Evaluation?
•A strategic risk assessment tool
•Prospective evaluation of alternative management strategies
•Selection of management strategies that are most likely to meet
management objectives and “robust” to major uncertainties
•Two components
• Consultative process
• Technical implementation
Management Strategy Evaluation
and Harvest Control Rules
13. •Objectives
• What the strategy is designed to achieve.
•Monitoring
•Assessment
• Stock assessment or simple analysis
•Harvest Control Rules or Decision rule
• An agreed basis for using the output of
monitoring to change/not change the level of
fishing
•Implementation
• Management measures designed to achieve
change in fishing mortality.
Components of a Harvest Strategy
14. Development of Harvest Strategies for Conservation Measures
•Evaluation of their performance against management
objectives.
•Understand their sensitivity and robustness to uncertainties
•Use of simulation tools to explore the robustness of
management options to uncertainties in the system
•Compare the evolution of “real” and perceived systems to
quantify errors and biases
•To quantify the success at achieving pre-agreed objectives
Management Strategy Evaluation
and Harvest Control Rules
18. Challenges
Sustaining Catch levels and Controlling fishing capacity
Participation of developing countries
Translation of the conservation and management
measures into national laws
Compliance to Conservation and management measures
Managing the fisheries development aspirations of the
developing/coastal states
Financial contributions
Distribution of the conservation burden and benefit is a
critical challenge to the conservation and management
of trans-boundary fish stocks - How to share the
conservation burden
19. Implications for IW LEARN
Projects/GEF – Marine Fisheries
Perspectives Traditional Approach
Science-based approach tends to drive the
Strategy/institutional frameworks
Alternative Approach
Determine the strategy First ( a dialogue between the
scientist/Decision-makers).
Determine your decision rule ( what to do when X
happens)
Advise what science needs to address
Implementation of management decision/monitoring
and assessments.
Performance Review of the Commissions/Authority
20. Area Beyond National
Jurisdiction (ABNJ) Project –
Tuna
FAO (with WWF) implemented (GEF funded) –
Support Tuna RFMOs improving science to
management/governance
Promote Sustainable management of tuna resources
Strengthen Monitoring and surveillance of fisheries
Reduce ecosystem aspects.
Green Zone with high probability
In case of not green zone, come back as quick as possible with high probability.
Other Priorities (Social)
Employment/stability of catch
Maximum Economic Yield Vs Maximum Sustainable Yield.
Expanding Fleet Capacity/ Opportunity (Industry)
Conserving stocks for Intrinsic Benefits (Enviros)
Participation of developing countries - now support through a meeting participation fund.
Determining the distribution of the conservation burden and benefit is a critical challenge to the conservation and management of trans-boundary fish stocks. Given current levels of over- fishing and overcapacity in many trans-boundary fisheries, some or all participating States must necessarily reach a compromise with regard to their interests and carry some share of the conservation burden.