SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 32
RELATIONSHIP OF SGPT (ALT) LEVELS
  WITH INSULIN RESISTANCE IN
 OVERWEIGHT AND OBESE PERSONS

              Kapantais E, Chala E.
  Department of Diabetes-Obesity-Metabolism,
Metropolitan Hospital, Neo Faliro, Athens, Greece



                ECO 2007
                Budapest
                 Hungary
INTRODUCTION
    A number of studies have shown relationship
 between gamma-GT or SGPT/ALT levels and insulin
resistance, suggesting that these parameters can be
   used as markers for the insulin resistance state.
  Gamma-GT and SGPT/ALT levels, even within the
normal range, correlate with increasing intrahepatic
 fat. It has been suggested that the elevation of the
 hepatic enzymes could be the expression of excess
deposition of fat in the liver, which is closely related
to obesity and other metabolic disturbances such as
          dyslipidaemia or diabetes mellitus.
AIM
 of our study was to investigate the relationship
 between SGPT/ALT levels and insulin resistance
indices in overweight and obese persons who are
            invariably insulin resistant.
SUBJECTS-METHODS
We studied retrospectively 219 male and 382 female (total 601) overweight and
obese persons who attended the outpatient clinic of Diabetes-Obesity-Metabolism
Department of our Hospital, in order to reveal any trend between ALT and insulin
resistance.
Subjects with overt liver disease were excluded from the study.
Subjects were also classified as “non-diabetic” and “diabetic” according to
reported personal history or considering HbA1c (cutoff point: 6.2%) and fasting
plasma glucose levels (cutoff point: 110mg/dl).
Fasting glucose and insulin levels as well as ferritin, SGOT, SGPT, ALP and gamma-
GT levels were measured after overnight fasting.
Anthropometric measurements were performed: BMI, waist circumference, WHR,
sagittal abdominal diameter, % total body fat (BIA method).
Insulin resistance (HOMA model) and insulin sensitivity (Quicki) were calculated as
well as “Insulinogenic” Index which was defined as the ratio of fasting insulin to
fasting glucose.
Subjects were divided in HOMA, Quicki and Insulinogenic Index quartiles and SGPT
comparisons were made within these quartiles. Statistic analysis included ANOVA,
multiple regression analysis, Man-Whitney test and non parametric (Spearman)
correlation.
SUBJECTS-METHODS
                              Males          Females
                                                             p
                              (n=218)          (n=382)

Age (years)                 46.0 ± 13.9     42.2 ± 13.7     0.001
BMI (kg/m2)                  35.1 ±6.2       34.3 ±6.2       NS
Waist Circumference (cm)   115.6 ± 14.5     104.0 ± 13.6    0.000
% Total Body Fat            35.9 ± 5.9       44.4 ± 6.1     0.000
Glucose (mg/dl)            122.1 ± 49.3     102.9 ± 33.7    0.000
Insulin (μU/ml)             16.9 ± 11.6      13.3 ± 9.8     0.000
SGOT (U/l)                  25.8 ± 13.2      20.7 ± 8.3     0.000
SGPT (U/l)                  38.9 ± 24.3     25.7 ± 15.2     0.000
Gamma-GT (U/l)              38.1 ± 26.9     23.4 ± 19.8     0.000
HOMA                        5.06 ± 3.86     3.45 ± 2.82     0.000
Quicki                     0.318 ± 0.046   0.331 ± 0.0319   0.000
Insulinogenic Index        0.154 ± 0.117   0.135 ± 0.101    0.043
Type 2 Diabetes (Yes/No)     94 / 124         64 / 318      0.000
RESULTS
                  150
                             106
                  125        131
                                              362
                             193              622
                             33
                                              595
                  100        42
                             194
                             216
                             98
           SGPT
                             212
                             207
                             77
    SGPT



                                              453
                                              631
                                              496
                                              563
                   75                         257
                                              628
                                              620
                                              621
                                              574
                                              429
                                              626
                                              435
                                              571
                                              382
                   50

                   25

                    0
                    N=     218              382
                          male
                         Male             female
                                         Female
                                   sex
     Males had higher SGPT levels than females
(38.9U/l 24.3U/l vs. 25.7U/l 15.2U/l, p= 0.000)
RESULTS (Males)

SGPT differed within HOMA, Quicki
 and Insulinogenic Index quartiles.
RESULTS (Males)
              150

                             150                                   106
              125                                                  131

                                                                          106
                                193
                             125                                   33
                                                                          131


              100                           193
                                                                          33

                             100                  98
                                                  207
                                                  77
SGPT




                                                            98
       SGPT

                                                            207
                                                            77
                                223
              SGPT
                                7           223
               75             75            7 138
                                                            138
                                215         215



                              50
               50
                              25
               25
                               0
                                  N=       55           55               54      54
                 0                         1            2                3       4
                     N=       55            55                    54            54
                              1        Homa 2
                                            quartiles according to males
                                                       3         4

                                Homa quartiles
                          Homa quartiles according to males

                            F= 3.798, p= 0.011
RESULTS (Males)
              150

                                     106
              125                    131


                                                   193
                                     33

              100
       SGPT
                                            207
                                            77
SGPT




                                                   223
                                                   7
               75                           138
                                                   215



               50

               25

                0
                N=       56      53        55     54
                         1       2         3      4

                            Quicki quartiles
                     quicki quartiles according to males

                       F= 4.440, p= 0.005
RESULTS (Males)
              150

                                                    106
              125                            131


                           193
                                             33

              100
       SGPT
                                             98
                                      77
SGPT




                           223
                           7
               75
                                      214


               50

               25

                0
                N=        54      56        54     54
                          1       2         3      4

                    Insulinogenic index quartiles
                     insulinogenic index quartiles (males)

                        F= 5.215, p= 0.002
RESULTS (Males)
              150


              125


              100
       SGPT
SGPT




               75


               50


               25

                0
                    0   10   20   30   40 50   60   70   80   90


                              fasting insulin
                                fasting insulin

                        r= 0.351, p= 0.000
RESULTS (Males)
              150


              125


              100
       SGPT
SGPT




               75


               50


               25

                0
                    0      5    10   15   20   25      30


                        Insulin resistance (HOMA)
                           Insulin Resistance (HOMA)

                         r= 0.248, p= 0.000
RESULTS (Males)

              150


              125


              100
       SGPT
SGPT




               75


               50

               25

                0
                 ,2   ,3   ,4     ,5      ,6   ,7   ,8

                                Quicki
                                 Quicki

                      r= -0.248, p=0.000
RESULTS (Males)
              150


              125


              100
       SGPT
SGPT




               75


               50

               25

                0
                0,0    ,2    ,4     ,6     ,8   1,0

                        "insulinogenic" index
                      Insulinogenic index

                      r= 0.340, p= 0.000
RESULTS (Males)
             Multiple regression analysis

        R        R square      F            p
      0.401        0.161     15.24        0.000


                     Beta            t             p
Insulinogenic
                    0.319          4.39           0.000
    Index
  Ferritin          0.230          3.16           0.002

    Age, BMI, WHR and Waist circumference
       were not significant in the model
RESULTS (Males)
                     150


                     125


                     100
              SGPT
       SGPT




                      75


                      50


                      25

                       0
                           0   100   200   300   400   500   600   700


                                           Ferritin
                                            ferritin
                                r= 0.230, p= 0.003
       (r= 0.2015, p= 0.01 after controlling for Insulin Resistance)
On the other side, the relationship between SGPT and Insulin Resistance
         remains after controlling for ferritin (r= 0.1706, p= 0.03)
RESULTS (Males)
                            SEX: 0 male
                      700

                      600

           Ferritin   500

                      400
ferritin




                      300

                      200

                      100

                        0
                            0       5     10     15    20       25

                                    Insulin Resistance (HOMA)
                                Insulin resistance (HOMA)

                                  r= 0.265, p= 0.001
RESULTS (Females)

SGPT differed within HOMA, Quicki
 and Insulinogenic Index quartiles.
RESULTS (Females)
              150

              125
                          362
                                                  622

                                                  595
              100
       SGPT
SGPT



                                    453    631
                                           496    563
               75                                 257
                                                  628
                                           620    621
                          626
                          435
                                    557
               50         405       611




               25

                0
                N=       96     96        95     95

                         1      2         3      4

                          Homa quartiles
                    Homa quartiles according to females

                      F= 10.830, p= 0.000
RESULTS (Females)
              150

              125
                                                   362
                           622

                           595
              100
       SGPT
SGPT




                                     631    453
                           563       496
               75          257
                           628
                           621       620

                                                   626
                                                   435
                                            557
               50                           611    405




               25

                0
                N=       95      95        97     95

                          1      2         3      4

                            Quicki quartiles
                    Quicki quartiles according to females

                      F= 10.800, p= 0.000
RESULTS (Females)
              150

              125
                                      362
                                                    622

                                                    595
              100
       SGPT
SGPT




                                      453
                                      631
                                             496    563
               75                     257
                                      628
                                                    620
                                                    621
                           574
                           626
                           435
                                             557
               50          239
                           611
                           405
                                             364




               25

                0
                N=        96      96        95     95

                          1       2         3      4

                     Insulinogenic index quartiles
                    insulinogenic index quartiles (females)

                        F= 4.836, p= 0.003
RESULTS (Females)
              150


              125


              100
       SGPT
SGPT




               75


               50

               25

                0
                    0   10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

                              fasting insulin
                            fasting insulin

                        r= 0.278, p= 0.000
RESULTS (Females)
              150


              125


              100
       SGPT
SGPT




               75


               50

               25

                0
                    0      5   10    15   20   25      30

                           Insulin Resistance (HOMA)
                        Insulin resistance (HOMA)

                         r= 0.309, p= 0.000
RESULTS (Females)
              150


              125


              100
       SGPT
SGPT




               75


               50

               25

                0
                 ,2        ,3             ,4   ,5

                                Quicki
                                 Quicki

                      r= -0.309, p= 0.000
RESULTS (Females)
              150


              125


              100
       SGPT
SGPT




               75


               50

               25

                0
                0,0   ,2   ,4   ,6   ,8   1,0   1,2   1,4

                         "insulinogenic" index
                       Insulinogenic index

                      r= 0.180, p= 0.000
RESULTS (Females)
           Multiple regression analysis

      R        R square      F            p
    0.361        0.130     25.57        0.000


                   Beta            t             p
HOMA-IR           0.226          4.40           0.000

Ferritin          0.243          4.75           0.000


 Age, BMI, WHR and Waist circumference
    were not significant in the model
RESULTS (Females)
                      150


                      125


                      100
               SGPT
        SGPT




                       75


                       50

                       25

                        0
                            0   100   200   300   400   500

                                      Ferritin
                                       ferritin
                                r= 0.240, p= 0.000
       (r= 0.2485, p=0.000 after controlling for Insulin Resistance)
On the other side, the relationship between SGPT and Insulin Resistance
         remains after controlling for ferritin (r= 0.2314, p= 0.000)
RESULTS (Females)
                            SEX: 1 female
                      500



           Ferritin   400


                      300
ferritin




                      200


                      100


                        0
                            0     5     10   15    20   25      30

                                    Insulin Resistance (HOMA)
                                Insulin resistance (HOMA)

                                  r= 0.126, p= 0.019
Conclusions
1. SGPT/ALT levels are positively related to insulin
   resistance not only in the general population, but
   also among the overweight and obese persons, in
   both sexes, irrespectively of age, BMI, ferritin
   levels, body fat distribution or presence of type-2
   diabetes.
2. In overweight and obese persons SGPT/ALT levels
   are also positively related to serum ferritin levels,
   in both sexes.
3. Moreover, our findings document a strong and
   positive association between serum ferritin levels
   and Insulin resistance.
Discussion
Possible links between SGPT/ALT levels and insulin resistance:

1.   ALT has been associated with fatty liver disease, and fatty liver disease has
     been associated with insulin resistance.
2.   Moreover, because insulin suppresses genes encoding gluconeogenic
     enzymes, and ALT is a gluconeogenic enzyme, it is also possible that ALT is
     an indicator or impaired insulin signaling not necessarily associated with
     liver injury.
3.   Finally, inflammation may impair insulin signaling both in the liver and
     systemically. Our observation that a high ALT is associated with high ferritin
     levels independent of obesity and insulin resistance is consistent with the
     hypothesis that raised ALT levels may reflect inflammation which may lead
     to insulin resistance. (That, if we consider ferritin to be not only a marker of
     insulin resistance, but also an independent inflammatory marker)

One way or another, SGPT/ALT is a simple measurement, available in routine
clinical practice, which, according to our findings, may help identify individuals
likely to have insulin resistance.
Suggested Bibliography

1.   Sasiwarang Goya Wannamethee et al. Hepatic Enzymes, the
     Metabolic Syndrome and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Older Men.
     Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 2913-2918
2.   Barbora Vozarova et al. High Alanine Aminotransferase Is Associated
     With Decreased Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity and Predicts the
     Development of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes 2002; 51: 1889-1895
3.   Jose Manuel Fernandez-Real et al. Cross-Talk Between Iron
     Metabolism and Diabetes. Diabetes 2002; 51: 2348-2354
4.   Claudia Bozzini et al. Prevalence of Body Iron Excess in the
     Metabolic Syndrome. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 2061-2063
5.   Jose Manuel Fernandez-Real et al. Serum Ferritin as a Component of
     the Insulin Resistance Syndrome. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 62-68
Correspondence:
Eftychia Chala, email: echala@metropolitan-hospital.gr

More Related Content

Similar to 2007 15th eco

Elezioni Amministrative Castellaneta 2012
Elezioni Amministrative Castellaneta 2012Elezioni Amministrative Castellaneta 2012
Elezioni Amministrative Castellaneta 2012vivicastellaneta
 
Resultados Del Concurso 2010
Resultados Del Concurso 2010Resultados Del Concurso 2010
Resultados Del Concurso 2010ticsecundaria
 
84 07
84 0784 07
84 07env84
 
AA-I & Co. | Simple labor-category Price Curve Model
AA-I & Co. | Simple labor-category Price Curve ModelAA-I & Co. | Simple labor-category Price Curve Model
AA-I & Co. | Simple labor-category Price Curve ModelAljucar, Anvil-Incus & Co.
 
Rengineering Patient Access
Rengineering Patient AccessRengineering Patient Access
Rengineering Patient Accessmsammartano
 
76 07
76 0776 07
76 07env76
 
【北海道教育大学】平成19年度環境報告書
【北海道教育大学】平成19年度環境報告書【北海道教育大学】平成19年度環境報告書
【北海道教育大学】平成19年度環境報告書env76
 
autozone AZO_04AR
autozone  AZO_04ARautozone  AZO_04AR
autozone AZO_04ARfinance46
 
Resultado prova crcmg_estatistica_exame_suficiencia_1_2011
Resultado prova crcmg_estatistica_exame_suficiencia_1_2011Resultado prova crcmg_estatistica_exame_suficiencia_1_2011
Resultado prova crcmg_estatistica_exame_suficiencia_1_2011FcoCampos
 
Resultado do Exame de Suficiência 2011 - contabilistas
Resultado do Exame de Suficiência 2011 - contabilistasResultado do Exame de Suficiência 2011 - contabilistas
Resultado do Exame de Suficiência 2011 - contabilistasRoberto Dias Duarte
 
Levantamento1 censo 2000 a 2011
Levantamento1 censo 2000 a 2011Levantamento1 censo 2000 a 2011
Levantamento1 censo 2000 a 2011tonirre
 
Πέμπτη Εβδομάδα Τιμώμενου Μέλους
Πέμπτη Εβδομάδα Τιμώμενου ΜέλουςΠέμπτη Εβδομάδα Τιμώμενου Μέλους
Πέμπτη Εβδομάδα Τιμώμενου Μέλουςmpiskotos
 
9 dimension and properties table of upe
9 dimension and properties table of upe9 dimension and properties table of upe
9 dimension and properties table of upeChhay Teng
 
Final presentation
Final presentationFinal presentation
Final presentationnasharma
 
wyeth 3Q 2008 Net Revenue Report
wyeth 3Q 2008 Net Revenue Reportwyeth 3Q 2008 Net Revenue Report
wyeth 3Q 2008 Net Revenue Reportfinance12
 
070817gijyutusinnsasyoumei[1]
070817gijyutusinnsasyoumei[1]070817gijyutusinnsasyoumei[1]
070817gijyutusinnsasyoumei[1]guest3b547c
 

Similar to 2007 15th eco (20)

Elezioni Amministrative Castellaneta 2012
Elezioni Amministrative Castellaneta 2012Elezioni Amministrative Castellaneta 2012
Elezioni Amministrative Castellaneta 2012
 
Resultados Del Concurso 2010
Resultados Del Concurso 2010Resultados Del Concurso 2010
Resultados Del Concurso 2010
 
84 07
84 0784 07
84 07
 
AA-I & Co. | Simple labor-category Price Curve Model
AA-I & Co. | Simple labor-category Price Curve ModelAA-I & Co. | Simple labor-category Price Curve Model
AA-I & Co. | Simple labor-category Price Curve Model
 
Rengineering Patient Access
Rengineering Patient AccessRengineering Patient Access
Rengineering Patient Access
 
76 07
76 0776 07
76 07
 
Producción petrolera 2012
Producción petrolera 2012Producción petrolera 2012
Producción petrolera 2012
 
【北海道教育大学】平成19年度環境報告書
【北海道教育大学】平成19年度環境報告書【北海道教育大学】平成19年度環境報告書
【北海道教育大学】平成19年度環境報告書
 
Wmt Model Template
Wmt Model TemplateWmt Model Template
Wmt Model Template
 
autozone AZO_04AR
autozone  AZO_04ARautozone  AZO_04AR
autozone AZO_04AR
 
Resultado prova crcmg_estatistica_exame_suficiencia_1_2011
Resultado prova crcmg_estatistica_exame_suficiencia_1_2011Resultado prova crcmg_estatistica_exame_suficiencia_1_2011
Resultado prova crcmg_estatistica_exame_suficiencia_1_2011
 
Resultado do Exame de Suficiência 2011 - contabilistas
Resultado do Exame de Suficiência 2011 - contabilistasResultado do Exame de Suficiência 2011 - contabilistas
Resultado do Exame de Suficiência 2011 - contabilistas
 
Petroleum Import (2000-2010)
Petroleum Import (2000-2010)Petroleum Import (2000-2010)
Petroleum Import (2000-2010)
 
Levantamento1 censo 2000 a 2011
Levantamento1 censo 2000 a 2011Levantamento1 censo 2000 a 2011
Levantamento1 censo 2000 a 2011
 
Excel Básico 1
Excel Básico 1Excel Básico 1
Excel Básico 1
 
Πέμπτη Εβδομάδα Τιμώμενου Μέλους
Πέμπτη Εβδομάδα Τιμώμενου ΜέλουςΠέμπτη Εβδομάδα Τιμώμενου Μέλους
Πέμπτη Εβδομάδα Τιμώμενου Μέλους
 
9 dimension and properties table of upe
9 dimension and properties table of upe9 dimension and properties table of upe
9 dimension and properties table of upe
 
Final presentation
Final presentationFinal presentation
Final presentation
 
wyeth 3Q 2008 Net Revenue Report
wyeth 3Q 2008 Net Revenue Reportwyeth 3Q 2008 Net Revenue Report
wyeth 3Q 2008 Net Revenue Report
 
070817gijyutusinnsasyoumei[1]
070817gijyutusinnsasyoumei[1]070817gijyutusinnsasyoumei[1]
070817gijyutusinnsasyoumei[1]
 

More from iosis1979

2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό
2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό
2009 11ο Διαβητολογικόiosis1979
 
2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας
2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας
2008 7ο παχυσαρκίαςiosis1979
 
2006 14th ico 2
2006 14th ico 22006 14th ico 2
2006 14th ico 2iosis1979
 
2006 14th ico 1
2006 14th ico 12006 14th ico 1
2006 14th ico 1iosis1979
 
2006 6o παχυσαρκίας
2006 6o παχυσαρκίας2006 6o παχυσαρκίας
2006 6o παχυσαρκίαςiosis1979
 
2005 14th eco3
2005 14th eco32005 14th eco3
2005 14th eco3iosis1979
 
2005 14th eco2
2005 14th eco22005 14th eco2
2005 14th eco2iosis1979
 
2005 14th eco1
2005 14th eco12005 14th eco1
2005 14th eco1iosis1979
 
2004 13th eco
2004 13th eco2004 13th eco
2004 13th ecoiosis1979
 
2003 18th idf
2003 18th idf2003 18th idf
2003 18th idfiosis1979
 
1999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας2
1999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας21999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας2
1999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας2iosis1979
 
1999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας1
1999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας11999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας1
1999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας1iosis1979
 
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας3
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας31999 3ο παχυσαρκίας3
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας3iosis1979
 
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας2
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας21999 3ο παχυσαρκίας2
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας2iosis1979
 
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας1
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας11999 3ο παχυσαρκίας1
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας1iosis1979
 
1998 ιco 8th
1998 ιco 8th1998 ιco 8th
1998 ιco 8thiosis1979
 
1998 8th ico
1998 8th ico1998 8th ico
1998 8th icoiosis1979
 
1997 bile.8th eco
1997 bile.8th eco1997 bile.8th eco
1997 bile.8th ecoiosis1979
 
1997 alcohol 8th eco
1997 alcohol 8th eco1997 alcohol 8th eco
1997 alcohol 8th ecoiosis1979
 

More from iosis1979 (20)

Easd 2007
Easd 2007Easd 2007
Easd 2007
 
2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό
2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό
2009 11ο Διαβητολογικό
 
2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας
2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας
2008 7ο παχυσαρκίας
 
2006 14th ico 2
2006 14th ico 22006 14th ico 2
2006 14th ico 2
 
2006 14th ico 1
2006 14th ico 12006 14th ico 1
2006 14th ico 1
 
2006 6o παχυσαρκίας
2006 6o παχυσαρκίας2006 6o παχυσαρκίας
2006 6o παχυσαρκίας
 
2005 14th eco3
2005 14th eco32005 14th eco3
2005 14th eco3
 
2005 14th eco2
2005 14th eco22005 14th eco2
2005 14th eco2
 
2005 14th eco1
2005 14th eco12005 14th eco1
2005 14th eco1
 
2004 13th eco
2004 13th eco2004 13th eco
2004 13th eco
 
2003 18th idf
2003 18th idf2003 18th idf
2003 18th idf
 
1999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας2
1999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας21999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας2
1999 26ο ενδοκρινολογίας2
 
1999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας1
1999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας11999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας1
1999 26o eνδοκρινολογίας1
 
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας3
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας31999 3ο παχυσαρκίας3
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας3
 
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας2
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας21999 3ο παχυσαρκίας2
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας2
 
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας1
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας11999 3ο παχυσαρκίας1
1999 3ο παχυσαρκίας1
 
1998 ιco 8th
1998 ιco 8th1998 ιco 8th
1998 ιco 8th
 
1998 8th ico
1998 8th ico1998 8th ico
1998 8th ico
 
1997 bile.8th eco
1997 bile.8th eco1997 bile.8th eco
1997 bile.8th eco
 
1997 alcohol 8th eco
1997 alcohol 8th eco1997 alcohol 8th eco
1997 alcohol 8th eco
 

2007 15th eco

  • 1. RELATIONSHIP OF SGPT (ALT) LEVELS WITH INSULIN RESISTANCE IN OVERWEIGHT AND OBESE PERSONS Kapantais E, Chala E. Department of Diabetes-Obesity-Metabolism, Metropolitan Hospital, Neo Faliro, Athens, Greece ECO 2007 Budapest Hungary
  • 2. INTRODUCTION A number of studies have shown relationship between gamma-GT or SGPT/ALT levels and insulin resistance, suggesting that these parameters can be used as markers for the insulin resistance state. Gamma-GT and SGPT/ALT levels, even within the normal range, correlate with increasing intrahepatic fat. It has been suggested that the elevation of the hepatic enzymes could be the expression of excess deposition of fat in the liver, which is closely related to obesity and other metabolic disturbances such as dyslipidaemia or diabetes mellitus.
  • 3. AIM of our study was to investigate the relationship between SGPT/ALT levels and insulin resistance indices in overweight and obese persons who are invariably insulin resistant.
  • 4. SUBJECTS-METHODS We studied retrospectively 219 male and 382 female (total 601) overweight and obese persons who attended the outpatient clinic of Diabetes-Obesity-Metabolism Department of our Hospital, in order to reveal any trend between ALT and insulin resistance. Subjects with overt liver disease were excluded from the study. Subjects were also classified as “non-diabetic” and “diabetic” according to reported personal history or considering HbA1c (cutoff point: 6.2%) and fasting plasma glucose levels (cutoff point: 110mg/dl). Fasting glucose and insulin levels as well as ferritin, SGOT, SGPT, ALP and gamma- GT levels were measured after overnight fasting. Anthropometric measurements were performed: BMI, waist circumference, WHR, sagittal abdominal diameter, % total body fat (BIA method). Insulin resistance (HOMA model) and insulin sensitivity (Quicki) were calculated as well as “Insulinogenic” Index which was defined as the ratio of fasting insulin to fasting glucose. Subjects were divided in HOMA, Quicki and Insulinogenic Index quartiles and SGPT comparisons were made within these quartiles. Statistic analysis included ANOVA, multiple regression analysis, Man-Whitney test and non parametric (Spearman) correlation.
  • 5. SUBJECTS-METHODS Males Females p (n=218) (n=382) Age (years) 46.0 ± 13.9 42.2 ± 13.7 0.001 BMI (kg/m2) 35.1 ±6.2 34.3 ±6.2 NS Waist Circumference (cm) 115.6 ± 14.5 104.0 ± 13.6 0.000 % Total Body Fat 35.9 ± 5.9 44.4 ± 6.1 0.000 Glucose (mg/dl) 122.1 ± 49.3 102.9 ± 33.7 0.000 Insulin (μU/ml) 16.9 ± 11.6 13.3 ± 9.8 0.000 SGOT (U/l) 25.8 ± 13.2 20.7 ± 8.3 0.000 SGPT (U/l) 38.9 ± 24.3 25.7 ± 15.2 0.000 Gamma-GT (U/l) 38.1 ± 26.9 23.4 ± 19.8 0.000 HOMA 5.06 ± 3.86 3.45 ± 2.82 0.000 Quicki 0.318 ± 0.046 0.331 ± 0.0319 0.000 Insulinogenic Index 0.154 ± 0.117 0.135 ± 0.101 0.043 Type 2 Diabetes (Yes/No) 94 / 124 64 / 318 0.000
  • 6. RESULTS 150 106 125 131 362 193 622 33 595 100 42 194 216 98 SGPT 212 207 77 SGPT 453 631 496 563 75 257 628 620 621 574 429 626 435 571 382 50 25 0 N= 218 382 male Male female Female sex Males had higher SGPT levels than females (38.9U/l 24.3U/l vs. 25.7U/l 15.2U/l, p= 0.000)
  • 7. RESULTS (Males) SGPT differed within HOMA, Quicki and Insulinogenic Index quartiles.
  • 8. RESULTS (Males) 150 150 106 125 131 106 193 125 33 131 100 193 33 100 98 207 77 SGPT 98 SGPT 207 77 223 SGPT 7 223 75 75 7 138 138 215 215 50 50 25 25 0 N= 55 55 54 54 0 1 2 3 4 N= 55 55 54 54 1 Homa 2 quartiles according to males 3 4 Homa quartiles Homa quartiles according to males F= 3.798, p= 0.011
  • 9. RESULTS (Males) 150 106 125 131 193 33 100 SGPT 207 77 SGPT 223 7 75 138 215 50 25 0 N= 56 53 55 54 1 2 3 4 Quicki quartiles quicki quartiles according to males F= 4.440, p= 0.005
  • 10. RESULTS (Males) 150 106 125 131 193 33 100 SGPT 98 77 SGPT 223 7 75 214 50 25 0 N= 54 56 54 54 1 2 3 4 Insulinogenic index quartiles insulinogenic index quartiles (males) F= 5.215, p= 0.002
  • 11. RESULTS (Males) 150 125 100 SGPT SGPT 75 50 25 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 fasting insulin fasting insulin r= 0.351, p= 0.000
  • 12. RESULTS (Males) 150 125 100 SGPT SGPT 75 50 25 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Insulin resistance (HOMA) Insulin Resistance (HOMA) r= 0.248, p= 0.000
  • 13. RESULTS (Males) 150 125 100 SGPT SGPT 75 50 25 0 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 Quicki Quicki r= -0.248, p=0.000
  • 14. RESULTS (Males) 150 125 100 SGPT SGPT 75 50 25 0 0,0 ,2 ,4 ,6 ,8 1,0 "insulinogenic" index Insulinogenic index r= 0.340, p= 0.000
  • 15. RESULTS (Males) Multiple regression analysis R R square F p 0.401 0.161 15.24 0.000 Beta t p Insulinogenic 0.319 4.39 0.000 Index Ferritin 0.230 3.16 0.002 Age, BMI, WHR and Waist circumference were not significant in the model
  • 16. RESULTS (Males) 150 125 100 SGPT SGPT 75 50 25 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Ferritin ferritin r= 0.230, p= 0.003 (r= 0.2015, p= 0.01 after controlling for Insulin Resistance) On the other side, the relationship between SGPT and Insulin Resistance remains after controlling for ferritin (r= 0.1706, p= 0.03)
  • 17. RESULTS (Males) SEX: 0 male 700 600 Ferritin 500 400 ferritin 300 200 100 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Insulin Resistance (HOMA) Insulin resistance (HOMA) r= 0.265, p= 0.001
  • 18. RESULTS (Females) SGPT differed within HOMA, Quicki and Insulinogenic Index quartiles.
  • 19. RESULTS (Females) 150 125 362 622 595 100 SGPT SGPT 453 631 496 563 75 257 628 620 621 626 435 557 50 405 611 25 0 N= 96 96 95 95 1 2 3 4 Homa quartiles Homa quartiles according to females F= 10.830, p= 0.000
  • 20. RESULTS (Females) 150 125 362 622 595 100 SGPT SGPT 631 453 563 496 75 257 628 621 620 626 435 557 50 611 405 25 0 N= 95 95 97 95 1 2 3 4 Quicki quartiles Quicki quartiles according to females F= 10.800, p= 0.000
  • 21. RESULTS (Females) 150 125 362 622 595 100 SGPT SGPT 453 631 496 563 75 257 628 620 621 574 626 435 557 50 239 611 405 364 25 0 N= 96 96 95 95 1 2 3 4 Insulinogenic index quartiles insulinogenic index quartiles (females) F= 4.836, p= 0.003
  • 22. RESULTS (Females) 150 125 100 SGPT SGPT 75 50 25 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 fasting insulin fasting insulin r= 0.278, p= 0.000
  • 23. RESULTS (Females) 150 125 100 SGPT SGPT 75 50 25 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Insulin Resistance (HOMA) Insulin resistance (HOMA) r= 0.309, p= 0.000
  • 24. RESULTS (Females) 150 125 100 SGPT SGPT 75 50 25 0 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 Quicki Quicki r= -0.309, p= 0.000
  • 25. RESULTS (Females) 150 125 100 SGPT SGPT 75 50 25 0 0,0 ,2 ,4 ,6 ,8 1,0 1,2 1,4 "insulinogenic" index Insulinogenic index r= 0.180, p= 0.000
  • 26. RESULTS (Females) Multiple regression analysis R R square F p 0.361 0.130 25.57 0.000 Beta t p HOMA-IR 0.226 4.40 0.000 Ferritin 0.243 4.75 0.000 Age, BMI, WHR and Waist circumference were not significant in the model
  • 27. RESULTS (Females) 150 125 100 SGPT SGPT 75 50 25 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Ferritin ferritin r= 0.240, p= 0.000 (r= 0.2485, p=0.000 after controlling for Insulin Resistance) On the other side, the relationship between SGPT and Insulin Resistance remains after controlling for ferritin (r= 0.2314, p= 0.000)
  • 28. RESULTS (Females) SEX: 1 female 500 Ferritin 400 300 ferritin 200 100 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Insulin Resistance (HOMA) Insulin resistance (HOMA) r= 0.126, p= 0.019
  • 29. Conclusions 1. SGPT/ALT levels are positively related to insulin resistance not only in the general population, but also among the overweight and obese persons, in both sexes, irrespectively of age, BMI, ferritin levels, body fat distribution or presence of type-2 diabetes. 2. In overweight and obese persons SGPT/ALT levels are also positively related to serum ferritin levels, in both sexes. 3. Moreover, our findings document a strong and positive association between serum ferritin levels and Insulin resistance.
  • 30. Discussion Possible links between SGPT/ALT levels and insulin resistance: 1. ALT has been associated with fatty liver disease, and fatty liver disease has been associated with insulin resistance. 2. Moreover, because insulin suppresses genes encoding gluconeogenic enzymes, and ALT is a gluconeogenic enzyme, it is also possible that ALT is an indicator or impaired insulin signaling not necessarily associated with liver injury. 3. Finally, inflammation may impair insulin signaling both in the liver and systemically. Our observation that a high ALT is associated with high ferritin levels independent of obesity and insulin resistance is consistent with the hypothesis that raised ALT levels may reflect inflammation which may lead to insulin resistance. (That, if we consider ferritin to be not only a marker of insulin resistance, but also an independent inflammatory marker) One way or another, SGPT/ALT is a simple measurement, available in routine clinical practice, which, according to our findings, may help identify individuals likely to have insulin resistance.
  • 31. Suggested Bibliography 1. Sasiwarang Goya Wannamethee et al. Hepatic Enzymes, the Metabolic Syndrome and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Older Men. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 2913-2918 2. Barbora Vozarova et al. High Alanine Aminotransferase Is Associated With Decreased Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity and Predicts the Development of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes 2002; 51: 1889-1895 3. Jose Manuel Fernandez-Real et al. Cross-Talk Between Iron Metabolism and Diabetes. Diabetes 2002; 51: 2348-2354 4. Claudia Bozzini et al. Prevalence of Body Iron Excess in the Metabolic Syndrome. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 2061-2063 5. Jose Manuel Fernandez-Real et al. Serum Ferritin as a Component of the Insulin Resistance Syndrome. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 62-68
  • 32. Correspondence: Eftychia Chala, email: echala@metropolitan-hospital.gr