Presentation by Eugenio Diaz-Bonilla (IFPRI) at Policy Seminar on "A Post-Bali Food Security Agenda," May 6, 2104 in Washington, DC.

1. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
IFPRI
On Food Stocks, “Peace
Clauses” and “Permanent
Solutions” after Bali
Eugenio Diaz-Bonilla (IFPRI)
A Post-Bali Food Security Agenda
May 6, 2104
IFPRI

2. IFPRI
Structure of Presentation
 Background
 Legal Issues
 Economic and Operational Issues
 Conclusions
Page 2

3. IFPRI
Background
 Food security not a new issue…
• Emerged during UR, after UR, Doha (breakdown in 2008),
almost breakdown in Bali
 …but changed circumstances
• Higher prices, volatility?
• Recurrence of extreme weather events
• Energy developments affecting the food system
• Developing countries increases in GDP, agricultural
production/exports, support to agriculture.
• Changes in consumption and marketing channels
 Bali Agreement only part of DDA
• Trade Facilitation; 5 Ministerial Decisions on agriculture
and cotton; 4 on development and LDCs.
Page 3

4. IFPRI
Legal Issues: Background and Proposal
 Annex 2 (“Green Box”), paragraph 1:
• “fundamental requirement” and “basic criteria”
 Food security stocks (Annex 2.3) and domestic
food subsidies (Annex 2.4)
• Purchases at “current market prices.” If “administered
prices,” compare to FERP (1986-1988)
• Selling prices can be at subsidized prices
 G-33 proposal, based on the 2008 Modalities Rev.4
• Not counting in AMS when a developing country
purchases products for FSS from LI/RP producers
• Concerns: violates basic criteria of no price support;
excessive stocks may lead to subsidized exports
Page 4

5. IFPRI
Legal Issues: “Peace Clause” 1
 No time to discuss options; therefore, postpone the
issue…
 Protects developing with existing programs from
complaints under AoA, if they comply with the rest of
Annex 2.3 and additional conditions:
 a) notify CoA that it is exceeding or at risk of exceeding DS
 b) be current on notifications of DS
 c) provide timely information on public FSS (template)
 d) FSS do not distort trade or adversely affect FS of others
 e) potential increase in DS only up to that notified in a)
 f) Accept requests for consultations
 Temporary (limited period) versus Interim (until a
“permanent solution” is found)
Page 5

6. IFPRI
Legal Issues: “Peace Clause” 2
 WTO Members have to find “permanent solution”
(until two Ministerial Conferences, about 4 years)
 Only existing FSS protected
 Notification and transparency requirements not
mere formalities, considering many WTO
members are extremely behind schedule
 “traditional staple food crops” ….“primary
agricultural products that are predominant staples
in the traditional diet..”
 LDCs exempted from DS disciplines
 FSS could be challenged under other WTO texts
(e.g. Subsidies and Countervailing Measures)?
Page 6

7. IFPRI
Legal Issues: “Permanent Solution” 1
 Developing countries can provide domestic food
aid (Annex 2, paragraph 4)
 The question is procurement…
• Buy at market prices (Brazil, US)
• Define “eligible production” in a way that focuses on
quantities bought (follow Korean Beef case)
• Define “fixed external reference price” (FERP) in USD
 “in accordance” with Annex 3 and “taking into account”
constituent data and methodology in original schedule
 With procured quantities and USD FERP, many
developing countries stay below the “de minimis”
(examples in Montemayor, 2014).

8. IFPRI
Legal Issues: Permanent Solution 2
 The question is procurement (cont…)
• Consider adjustment by inflation
 18.4 refers to Committee on Agriculture, not countries
 But one submission was in constant 1991 prices
 Clarify link between “administered prices” and
“market prices” (Diaz-Bonilla, 2013)
• Rebuttable presumed in compliance of not providing
price support if administered prices are in line with
domestic prices or import parity prices (including
allowed border protection under WTO)
• Not exports allowed from food security stocks
 There are other (not good) ideas…

9. IFPRI
Economic and Operational Issues 1
 Integrated Food Security Framework
• FS: multidimensional ; influenced by many policies and
contextual variables; diverse impacts depending on
other policies, structural issues and type of households
• Role for Public Food Security Stocks?
Page 9

10. IFPRI
Economic and Operational Issues 2
 Tinbergen Rule (1952) and Bhagwati Rule (1971)
 Different types of FSS: Emergency, Food
Redistribution Stocks, Stabilization Stocks (single
price, price bands, extreme values, price support…)
 Triple burden malnutrition: a) under-nutrition, b)
micronutrients, and c) over consumption
• Lack of dietary diversity, child stunting/wasting, mothers
low BMI. Arimond & Ruel,2006; Headey,2013
 Food safety nets: physical delivery, vouchers, cash
• Difficulty to administer? Costs? Vouchers and cash lead to
greater dietary diversity (John Hoddinot et al, 2013)
 If food stocks are to provide income support to
producers, then better Article 6.2, or Annex 2
paragraph 5 (direct income support to LI/RPs)?

11. IFPRI
Conclusions
 WTO: variety of legal options for FS, some do
not need additional negotiations
 “Food security” products a bad idea? It does not
address poverty issues, and dietary diversification
 Main problems are economic and operational
• Analyze different FSS within Integrated Food
Security Framework (multidimensional approach)
 More complex political economy of trade
negotiations and trade issues
• Example India, many poor and small farmers, but
a net food exporter (important in rice, beef, wheat)

12. IFPRI
THANKS…
Page 12

13. IFPRI
Page 13

14. IFPRI
Page 14

15. IFPRI
-50
-30
-10
10
30
50
70
90
110
130
150
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200 1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
Food and Oil Price Indices (real; 2010=100)
Food Price Index Real Crude Oil Price Index
Oil Price IndexFood Price Index
Page 15

16. IFPRI
Page 16