Dial M For Mitigation
•Transferir como KEY, PDF•
0 gostou•427 visualizações
A presentation of some of the security features and APIs in iPhone OS, allowing discussion of the threat model underlying Apple's chosen mitigation technology.
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Semelhante a Dial M For Mitigation
Semelhante a Dial M For Mitigation (20)
Mais de Graham Lee
Último
Último (20)
Dial M For Mitigation
- 1. Dial M for Mitigation Graham Lee
- 2. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key
- 3. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key
- 4. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key
- 5. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key
- 6. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key
- 7. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key
- 8. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key
- 9. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key 50f4b5a228b18a0c55747daee6f09c3800773b14
- 10. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key
- 11. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key
- 12. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key 50f4b5a228b18a0c55747daee6f09c3800773b14
- 13. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key 50f4b5a228b18a0c55747daee6f09c3800773b14 50f4b5a228b18a0c55747daee6f09c3800773b14
- 14. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key
- 15. Code Signing - Identity Private Key Public Key
- 16. Code Signing - Identity Private Key
- 18. Application Signing MyGreatApp MacOS Contents Resources NIBs, images… MyGreatApp.ipa
- 19. Application Signing MyGreatApp NIBs, images… MyGreatApp.ipa
- 20. Application Signing MyGreatApp NIBs, images… MyGreatApp.ipa
- 21. Application Signing MyGreatApp NIBs, images… MyGreatApp.ipa
- 22. Application Signing MyGreatApp NIBs, images… MyGreatApp.ipa
- 23. Code Signing - Requirements MyGreatApp.ipa
- 24. Code Signing - Requirements MyGreatApp.ipa
- 25. Code Signing - Requirements MyGreatApp.ipa
- 26. Code Signing - App Store A B C D
- 27. Code Signing - App Store A B C D
- 28. Code Signing - App Store A B C D
- 29. Code Signing - App Store A B C D
- 30. Code Signing - App Store A B C D
- 31. Code Signing - App Store A B C D
- 32. Code Signing - App Store A B C D
- 33. Keychain Services • Passwords • Certificates • Private Keys • Data blobs
- 34. Keychain Services • Passwords • Certificates • Private Keys • Data blobs
- 35. Sandbox
- 36. Sandbox /tmp
- 37. Sandbox /tmp
- 38. Sandbox /tmp /tmp
- 39. Sandbox /tmp /tmp /tmp
- 40. iamleeg
- 41. iamleeg
Notas do Editor
- In this presentation we’ll look at some of the security mitigations in the iPhone OS, and try and determine what risks are being addressed. Ideally we’d work the other way round but we need to treat Apple’s threat model as a black box.
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- Rely on the fact that a signature can be generated with the private key (by decrypting the checksum), and verified with the public key (by encrypting the signature and comparing with the checksum). Then a certificate explains who the holder of the private key is. Next: what this means to an app
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- So that’s how the theory applies to an application. We sign all of the application content (on iPhone only; things change slightly on Macs due to the presence of dynamic libraries) so that even if an image or help file changes, we can detect it.
- Identifying something is only useful if you’re going to ask questions about its identity. On the iPhone (and Mac) there’s a requirements language that lets you test properties of the developer’s identity and of the application. Applications have at least one requirement: the _designated_ requirement. Any code object that satisfies an app’s designated requirement is another version of that app, as far as the OS is concerned.
- Identifying something is only useful if you’re going to ask questions about its identity. On the iPhone (and Mac) there’s a requirements language that lets you test properties of the developer’s identity and of the application. Applications have at least one requirement: the _designated_ requirement. Any code object that satisfies an app’s designated requirement is another version of that app, as far as the OS is concerned.
- Identifying something is only useful if you’re going to ask questions about its identity. On the iPhone (and Mac) there’s a requirements language that lets you test properties of the developer’s identity and of the application. Applications have at least one requirement: the _designated_ requirement. Any code object that satisfies an app’s designated requirement is another version of that app, as far as the OS is concerned.
- Identifying something is only useful if you’re going to ask questions about its identity. On the iPhone (and Mac) there’s a requirements language that lets you test properties of the developer’s identity and of the application. Applications have at least one requirement: the _designated_ requirement. Any code object that satisfies an app’s designated requirement is another version of that app, as far as the OS is concerned.
- Identifying something is only useful if you’re going to ask questions about its identity. On the iPhone (and Mac) there’s a requirements language that lets you test properties of the developer’s identity and of the application. Applications have at least one requirement: the _designated_ requirement. Any code object that satisfies an app’s designated requirement is another version of that app, as far as the OS is concerned.
- Identifying something is only useful if you’re going to ask questions about its identity. On the iPhone (and Mac) there’s a requirements language that lets you test properties of the developer’s identity and of the application. Applications have at least one requirement: the _designated_ requirement. Any code object that satisfies an app’s designated requirement is another version of that app, as far as the OS is concerned.
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- What you can’t see from this slide: the developer (D) and beta tester (B) must collude on production of the provisioning profile, and B can only produce a finite number of beta-test permissions for every app. It’s about 100. Also, Apple (A) adds DRM to the application before re-signing it and submitting it to the customer (C), so each app can be identified with the customer who purchased it. Before re-signing an application, Apple subjects it to a vetting process. Exercise: see if you can determine the routes malware authors will use to get their malicious software onto the phones of either B or C. How could these vulnerabilities be mitigated?
- Keychain, or a similar API, exists on other platforms but in the case of the iPhone the private key is baked into the device rather than being derived from a password. What does that mean for the confidentiality of the keychain items? What about when the phone is backed up using iTunes?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Each application has space for its documents, library files (prefs and support files), cache/scratch files and confidential data. But no application can work with the files of any other, and access to system files is limited to public API. Why should Apple put this restriction in? What benefits does it provide?
- Feel free to contact me and ask any questions.
- Feel free to contact me and ask any questions.
- Feel free to contact me and ask any questions.
- Feel free to contact me and ask any questions.
- Feel free to contact me and ask any questions.
- Feel free to contact me and ask any questions.
- Feel free to contact me and ask any questions.
- Feel free to contact me and ask any questions.
- Feel free to contact me and ask any questions.
- Feel free to contact me and ask any questions.