Two Underground NWO Bases Destroyed

1. Evidence: Denver and DC Quakes Caused by
Nukes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGlvu_M
Ma9g
The sudden spike shown in both the very unusual DC and Denver earthquakes on August 23
are consistent with an explosion from a sub-surface nuclear bomb. A recent interview of
Benjamin Fulford by David Wilcock gives some intriguing possibilities about a counter coup,
and hope for release of suppressed energy technologies.
by Sterling D. Allan

2. Today I've received a phone call and a number of
emails from people referring to an interview that
David Wilcock conducted recently with
Benjamin Fulford, who asserts that the recent DC
and Denver Quakes were spurred by underground nukes wiping out two of the New World Order
bunkers by "white hat" elements in the U.S. Pentagon, signaling the end of days for the dark
cabal that have been running the planet for millennia. The interview concludes with a discussion
about how with this victory over the dark elements of the former powers-that-be, that many
hitherto suppressed energy technologies will soon be released.
It's all a bit difficult to believe, and I probably wouldn't be mentioning it to you were it not for
some hard facts that support the key points about the earthquakes not being natural. They have
the same seismological signature as what accompanies a nuclear blast detonated a few miles
below the Earth's surface.
Here is a government website that gives a comparison of a nuclear test and an earthquake on
seismograph. Here is a comparison they show between the May 11, 1998 Indian Nuclear Test,
and the April 4, 1995 earthquake in Pakistan.
It explains:
Livermore seismologist Bill Walter explains that the differences in seismic P- and S-wave
energy provide one method of discriminating explosions from earthquakes. Seismic P waves are
compressional waves, similar to sound waves in the air. Shear (S) waves are transverse waves,
like those that propagate along a rope when one end is shaken. Because underground explosions
are spherically symmetric disturbances, they radiate seismic P waves efficiently. In contrast,
earthquakes result from sliding or rupture along a buried fault surface and strongly excite the
transverse motions of S waves. Thus, we expect that explosions will show strong P waves and

3. weak S waves and that earthquakes will show weak P waves and strong S waves, as seen in
Figure 2.
With that in mind, now look at this image of the seismic signature of the DC quake as shown at
NBC17:
Readings from a seismograph at
Washington and Lee University, about 85
miles southwest of the earthquake's
epicenter in Mineral.
Does that seismograph depict a natural quake or a nuke or explosion-induced quake?
Could it be any more blatant?
Its as obvious as Building 7 being brought down by pre-placed demolition charges on 9/11.
Here's the seismograph from the August 23 Denver quake that same day, as published by the
Denver Post.
A seismogram of the Trinidad earthquake as recorded on the Kent Denver School seismograph.
Again, the immediate onset of the large quake at the bottom right is indicative of an explosion-
induced quake, not a natural quake.

4. In poking around a little bit, I found an August 24 story from the Canadian PressCore, titled:
Seismic evidence reveals underground nuclear detonation south of Washington DC. The author
says that he was put onto this possibility by an unusual email he received from someone who
apparently was a whistleblower.
I was pointed to this overlooked piece of evidence by someone who claimed to be with the
United States Air Force. The story submission appeared to be sent by mistake as nothing was
visible in the body of the submission. Instead of sending it to the trash I thought I would apply an
old intelligence trick I was taught back in 1989. I right clicked my mouse on the body of the
submission and selected all, then copy. I then opened up the notepad and selected paste from the
menu. You would expect nothing to be pasted as there was nothing in the body of the submission
but, just as I thought, a paragraph was pasted into the notepad. What was revealed was 1
paragraph whereby who ever sent it stated he was a member of the United States Air Force. He
stated that the Virginia 5.8 magnitude earth "wasn't a natural earthquake and not a HAARP
earthquake". He told me to find a seismograph of the Washington DC area earthquake and
compare it to a past earthquake. Then he stated that I should Google DUMB or Deep
Underground Military Bases. He ended by stating "the ABC warnings are real". I tried to trace
the IP of the submission but they don't exists.
Air Force tunnel boring machine links deep underground military bases across U.S.

5. In the introduction to his interview with Fulford about the Denver and D.C. earthquakes not only
being nuke-induced, but that they were used to destroy two underground New World Order
bunker cities (of possibly 30,000 people each), Wilcock says:
I started to contact my own sources, which have been built up over being a public figure on the
Internet since 1999 – and gaining the trust of many people in various classified programs. I was
absolutely astonished when I started to ask around and found out that everyone I know, with one
exception who probably wasn't on a need-to-know basis, confirmed that this attack did happen.
I'm familiar with the underground bunkers and cities that the black ops have been building. The
best documentary I know on this was done by Jesse Ventura in his "Conspiracy Theory" series. I
built a feature page on the 2012 episode in which the last half of the program was devoted to the
underground bunkers that have quietly been built by dark elements in the U.S. Government
looking out for their own survival with no thought for informing or preparing the population at
large.
Here is some material that my awakened friend, Fred Burks compiled, who was formerly a
translator for two U.S. Presidents:
Comparisons of seismograph readings for earthquakes with nuclear tests
https://www.llnl.gov/str/Walter.html - Comparison of a nuclear test and an earthquake on
seismograph on a government website
http://www.iris.edu/hq/programs/education_and_outreach/animations/17 - Comparison of
seismograph signatures for various events
Washington, DC, 5.8 earthquake on Aug 23, 2011, 1:51 PM local time
http://www2.nbc17.com/news/2011/aug/23/13/59-earthquake-rocks-virginia-ar-1324668 -
Most striking seismograph of DC quake on NBC affiliate
http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Aug11/SneeEarthquake.html - Cornell University
seismograph quite definitive
http://www.geol.vt.edu/outreach/vtso/2011/0823-louisa - Multiple seismographs of DC quake
http://www.iris.edu/cgi-
bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110823_175103.5.spyder - Access to
hundreds more
Denver, 5.3 earthquake on Aug 22, 2011, 11:43 PM local time (roughly 12 hours before the
DC quake)
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_18737351 - Denver Post seismograph showing clearly
nuclear explosion signature
http://www.iris.edu/cgi-
bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110822_233020.4.spyder - Hundreds of

6. seismograph readings
To see what seismographs look like for more normal earthquakes, click below:
http://www.iris.edu/cgi-
bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110818_153740.0.spyder - 4.6 scale Aug 18,
2011 Off the coast of British Columbia
http://www.iris.edu/cgi-
bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110902_110325.7.spyder - 4.7 scale Sep 2,
2011 Utah
Both the Denver and DC earthquakes were quite shallow, with official reports giving 3.7
miles depth for the DC quake
(http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/se082311a.php) and 2.5 miles
for Denver (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2011/usc0005idz). That is
well within even conventional drilling technologies these days
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kola_Superdeep_Borehole). According to Wikipedia
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake), earthquakes under 70 km (43 miles) are considered
"shallow focus" earthquakes.
The Virginia quake was the largest there in 117 years, while the Denver quake was the largest
in Colorado in 41 years. These two rare quakes happened only 12 hours apart. (Washington
Post; Denver Post; Aug. 23, 2011)
So I find the evidence fairly solid that both of these quakes were not natural.
I agree with Fred that there is definitely enough evidence to consider the two very unusual
quakes on August 23 as probably being spurred by nukes. The question that is intriguing is why,
who, and how. Though it's hard to believe all the stuff covered in the Wilcock-Fulford
interview, I do think it's worth a perusal, to give you something to think about and a working
hypothesis to start from. It's definitely worth our attention, especially if the release of hitherto
suppressed free energy patents is one of the upshots of this recent counter coup.
What is alleged by Fulford and Wilcock is that the nukes were done by good elements in the
Pentagon who are fed up with the New World Order conspirators using the US Military to
enforce the spread of the police state tyranny, whose plan is to reduce the world population by
90% down to a "manageable" 500,000,000.
I personally am greatly encouraged by the possibility that there is that high a level of resistance
from within the ranks of what used to be nearly totally controlled by the conspirators. It's a
rebellion from within what used to be something they controlled.
The two underground cities were probably two key bunkers where the New World Order
conspirators thought they could go run and hide while they bring destruction to the inhabitants
on the surface. But now they have been sent a message: "We're all in this together here on planet
Earth; what you do to others you do to yourself, so stop the destruction."

7. Hanks Mills comments....
On September 17, 2011 11:43 PM, my associate Hank Mills added:
Elected government officials are not the only individuals who control the course of human
events. There exists powerful individuals from the realms of banking, finance, secretive extra-
government agencies, and the military-industrial complex, who manipulate the strings that make
the puppets in official elected offices do their bidding. This tangled web of the ultra elite power
barons is not easy to sort through. I do not think anyone fully understands the true structure of
these organizations, and their true motivations. What we do know, is that these institutes and
families of power have suppressed exotic technologies and the truth about extraterrestrial activity
on our planet. This suppression has been on going since before the crash of an extraterrestrial
space craft near Roswell, NM in the year 1947.
If a nuclear attack did take place on one or more underground bases, this would be a clear
indication of dissension in the ranks of the "powers that be." This whole situation reminds me --
to a certain extent --of the situation in the fictional series Stargate SG1. In that fictional series, a
highly secret, ultra black-budget military organization exists called, "Stargate Command." The
leadership of this organization have the task of trying to protect our planet from extraterrestrial
threats, exploring the galaxy by traveling through "stargates" which allow near instantaneous
travel to other worlds, and maintaining the secrecy of their program. Those working for Stargate

8. Command are portrayed as being the "good guys", despite the fact they suppress exotic
technologies, withhold fundamental information about the universe from the public, and often
take it upon themselves to make decisions that impact the entire human race -- mostly with little
supervision from elected authorities.
In this same fictional series, there are rouge groups, agencies, and organizations that compete
with the Stargate program. Some of these entities claim to be opposed to Stargate Command's
secrecy and track record of sometimes putting humanity at risk, but in reality have their selfish
motivations. Of course there are groups of extraterrestrials in this fictional series that have their
own desires and interests. Some of these groups of extraterrestrials are benevolent, others are
opportunistic, and still others are hostile. Although communicating with these species have often
benefited Stargate Command's efforts to protect humanity, interaction with them have often
created troublesome situations or threats to Earth.
The simple fact is that in the fictional series of Stargate and in our reality, it is not always easy to
distinguish the good guys from the bad guys. Even the attack on the underground bases may (or
may not) have prevented some sinister plot, this does not mean those who launched the attack
were "good." They may not be heroes, or on the side of the billions of people on this planet.
Their motivation for the attack may not be as simple and pure as we may hope.
If these apparent earthquakes were actually attacks on underground bunkers, thousands of people
may have died. Many of these people probably were not evil, sinister individuals plotting for the
eradication of 90% of the population, but could have simply been engineers and scientists
working jobs, to earn a paycheck. The majority of those employed by these bases may have had
no political agenda at all, and simply were thrilled to work on exotic technologies -- or needed to
find a way to pay their mortgage!
For example, NASA has naysayed alternative energy and alternative propulsion technologies for
decades. The space agency has also belittled and mocked the incontrovertible evidence that
unknown craft are visiting our planet. Regardless what we think of those who have actively
participated in suppression, we cannot forget that the majority of people at NASA have had
nothing to do with it. To think that everyone at NASA is in a plot to suppress information that
could change our world is simply implausible beyond measure. Most of those individuals
working at NASA truly believe they are working for the agency with the most advanced space
technology in existence, or are simply there to get a paycheck.
Any nuclear attack that has taken place is a total and complete tragedy. If those who perpetuated
the attack desired to do the right thing, they should have organized a way to come forward to the
public, and share what they knew. Instead, these individuals -- many of which have probably
been actively participating in suppression of various topics -- may have taken another path that
limits their personal risk while ending the lives of others. Standing up and releasing highly
classified information about extraterrestrial life, exotic technologies that could benefit all of
humanity, or the operations of ultra secretive organizations, can be risky. In fact, it can be very
dangerous, but fear of persecution is not an excuse for a nuclear attack.
I would urge the individuals and organizations that want to do the "right thing" to avoid conflicts

9. with other entities, and simply speak up. Despite their rank, position, or situation they should
organize the information they have, and share it with the world. We live in an age where
communication is easier than ever before. If someone really wants to tell a story, in a matter of
hours or less they can upload videos of their testimony to YouTube, send the video to thousands
of people via email, post the information on countless message boards, drop a few hundred
DVDs in the mailbox, create a Facebook profile with the information, and transmit the
information in so many ways NO ONE will be able to stop it.
The more aspiring "good guys" who are willing to come forward and distribute their story at the
same time the better it is for everyone involved.
There is no excuse for violence. Even when it comes protecting ones self, the best defense is
honesty and full disclosure. I think the motivations and sincerity of any group that would
perpetuate an act of violence should be questioned.
Let's hope if a nuclear attack did happen on one or more top secret bases, that these will be last
such attacks.
What the world needs is the truth, the full truth, and nothing but the truth.
Sterling Adds...
The fact that the President and Congress have such low approval ratings has a lot to do with how
unbelievable they have become. Who can trust the government when they say: "This is how and
why 9/11 happened, and this is what we should do about it;" when a common sense look at what
actually happened screams so loudly to the contrary." Some truth from the government would be
nice, but it will take some time before people start believing again because they have been lied to
for so long.
###
This story is also published at BeforeItsNews.
Links
 http://www.divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/975-undergroundbases - David
Wilcock's interview with Benjamin Fulford
 Seismic evidence reveals underground nuclear detonation south of Washington DC.
(PressCore; Aug. 24, 2011)
 5.8-magnitude quake shakes central Va., East Coast (NBC17; Aug. 23, 2011)
 Minor damage from magnitude-5.3 Colorado quake (Denver Post; Aug. 23, 2011)
 http://www.whale.to/b/underground_h.html
 Obama Ordered To Denver Bunker By US Military "General Maslov states in his
report, though, his concern over this drill is "heightened" due to last months nuclear
attack on the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) branch of the intercontinental military
tunnel complex between Washington D.C. and Denver, and which we reported on in our

10. 24 August report Russia Reports Nuclear Explosions Hit Vast US Military Tunnel
Network." (EU Times; Sept. 14, 2011)
o Strange Sound Before Virginia Quake ! felt like the ground was shaking!
(YouTube; Aug. 24, 2011)
Were NORAD And Shadow Gov't Bases The Nuke/Quake Targets? (BeforeItsNews; Sept. 20,
2011)