A marine bioacoustics workshop at University of Washington's Friday Harbor Labs tracking the secret lives of shrimp and crab in the Puget Sound with Dr. Charles Greene of Cornell University.
2. Presentation Outline
Friday Harbor Acoustic Tag Shrimp Study Results
Friday Harbor Diver Tracking Study Results
Fish Aggregation Device (FAD) Results
Net Pen Fish Study Results
Eel Study Results
Columbia River Results
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
3. Acoustic Tag Results
Friday Harbor Acoustic Tag Results
Dock Shrimp
Conducted during the Friday Harbor
Bioacoustic Workshop
Study conducted in 2005, 2007, and 2009
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
4. Friday Harbor Laboratory, San Juan Island
University of Washington
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
5. Friday Harbor Laboratory, San Juan Island
University of Washington
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
6. Friday Harbor Laboratory Dock & Breakwater
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
7. Shrimp Experiment – Hydrophone Positions
Elevation
X (ft) Y (ft) Z (ft)*
A1 HD1 482.2 768 125
A2 HD2 482.2 768 109
A3 HD3 442.3 742.2 125
A4 HD4 442.3 742.2 112
B1 HD5 512.7 724.2 127
B2 HD6 512.7 724.2 99
B3 HD7 476.3 702.5 128
B4 HD8 476.3 702.5 99
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
8. Dock Shrimp (Pandalus danae)
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
9. Tagging the Shrimp
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
13. Acoustic Tag Shrimp Results
Fish Weight Length On-Screen
Number Fish Name Tag Code (gm) (mm) Color Release Time
1 Rudy 2000 7.1 85 Green 8/15/05 1919
2 2023 7.8 72.5 Purple 8/15/05 1934
3 Flippy 2046 8.3 90 Dark Pink 8/15/05 1950
4 2069 6.7 85 Orange 8/15/05 2015
5 2092 6.3 80 Olive 8/15/05 2010
6 Cory 2115 6.4 86 Deep Blue 8/15/05 2040
7 Teuren 2138 8.5 90 Yellow 8/15/05 2045
8 Alison 2161 6.5 86 Turquoise 8/15/05 2045
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
14. Acoustic Tag Shrimp Results
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
15. Tag #2161 (Allison)
Tecplot Figures & Animation
by Chris Mott
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
16. Tag #2023
Notice up-down migration
over 24 h period.
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
17. Tag #2046 (Flippy)
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
18. Tag #2069
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
19. Tag #2092
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
20. Tag #2138 (Teuren)
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
21. Acoustic Tag Results
Fish Aggregation Device (FAD) Study Results
LeReunion Island, Indian Ocean
Bigeye Scad
Conducted in 2003
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
22. Acoustic Tag Results
Net Pen Fish Study Results
McKenzie River, Northwest Territories, Canada
Lake Trout
Conducted in 2003
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
23. Net Pen Example
Dolomite Lake (Inuvik), Canada
Net Pen Example, Lake Trout Roberto Racca 2003
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
24. Net Pen Example
Dolomite Lake (Inuvik), Canada
Net Pen Example, Lake Trout Roberto Racca 2003
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
25. Acoustic Tag Results
Connecticut River Study Results
Downstream Migrating American Eels
Cabot Station, Turner Falls, MA
Conducted in 2002 and 2003
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
26. Flow
Acoustic Tag
Receiver
Flow
Cabot Station
on the Connecticut River
27. Methods: Equipment Installation
ATR & Computer
Surface Mount Hydrophone
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research
Bottom Mount Hydrophone
Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
28. Flow
E
Submerged
Wall & Shelf
N S
W
Depth (m)
0 10
1 9 Surface Byass
2 8
3 7
4 6
5 5
6 4 Cabot Station
7 3
8 2 Unit 6 Unit 5 Unit 4 Unit 3 Unit 2 Unit 1
9 1
10 0
29. Flow
Submerged E
Wall & Shelf
N S
Depth (m) W
0 10
1 9 Surface Byass
2 8
3 7
4 6
5 5
6 4 Cabot Station
7 3
8 2 Unit 6 Unit 5 Unit 4 Unit 3 Unit 2 Unit 1
9 1
10 0
30. Acoustic Tag Results
Mid-Columbia River Results
Downstream migrating salmon smolts
Conducted in 2006
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
31. 2006 Mid-Columbia River
Smolt Studies
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
32. 2006 Mid-Columbia
Detection Sites
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
34. Key Advantages of Acoustic Tags
Detection ranges in water up to 1 km.
Radio tags are typically limited to 10 m in
water.
Acoustic tags do not have an antenna,
reducing drag and the potential for atypical
behavior.
Over 500 tags in the same area can be
detected and tracked simultaneously.
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
35. 2006 Summary Acoustically Tagged Salmon Smolts
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
36. 2006 Acoustic Tag Study
Chinook Smolt with 1.5 g E-tag
153 mm Yearling Chinook
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
37. 2006 Acoustic Tag Study
Steelhead Smolt with 1.5 g E-tag
180 mm Steelhead
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
38. 2006 Acoustic Tag Study
Sockeye with 0.75 g micro tag
113 mm Sockeye
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
39. 2006 In-River
Detection Arrays
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
40. 2006 In-River Detection Arrays
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
41. 2006 Sockeye Travel
Time Results Between
Detection Sites Released
from Wells Dam
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
42. 2006 Sockeye Travel
Velocity Results Between
Detection Sites Released
from Wells Dam
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
43. 2006 Sockeye Project Survival
Rocky
Reach
Dam
Project =
0.9331 (SE
= 0.0121)
Rock Island Dam
Project = 0.9600
(SE = 0.0108)
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
44. 2006 Sockeye Route Specific Passage
Pph = 0.514
Psp = 0.017
Psc = 0.434
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
45. 2006 Sockeye Route Specific Survival
Sph = 0.966
Ssp = 1.030
Ssc = 1.030
Overall Dam
Survival = 0.979
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
46. Rocky Reach Dam Showing Tag Coverage Area
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
47. 1.6 Million Data Points (918 Individual Fish)
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
48. 1
Fish Track Overlaid with Water Velocity
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
49. In-Turbine Intake Study, Wanapum Dam
Using Acoustic Tags to Track Juvenile Salmonids
in Three Dimensions Within a Turbine Intake
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
50. Project Objectives:
Determine the Feasibility of Acoustically
Tracking Fish Within a Turbine Intake
For the Purpose of Evaluating a New Design of
Turbine that is Less Harmful to Passing Fish
Ultimately to Determine Areas Within the Turbine
that May Be More or Less Harmful to Fish
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
51. Feasibility
EXTREME Environment
This May
Tags Pushed to the Limit Not Work
at ALL
Totally Confined Space
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
52. Diagram of Deployment
Fish Release Pipe
FLOW
Turbine Runner
Hydrophones
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
54. Deployment
Fyke Net Frame
Hydrophones
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
55. Deployment
Hydrophone
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
56. Predicted Position Error
Method: Ehrenberg and Steig (2002)
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
57. Tagged Fish
Acoustic Tag
Balloon Tag
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
58. Tag Transmit Settings
25 Pulses per
Second (0.04 s per
Pulse)
3 Millisecond (0.003
s) Coded Pulse
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
59. Data Collection
50 Minutes
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
62. Data Processing – 3D Tracking
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
63. Tagged Tennis Ball Track
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
64. Sacramento River Real-time Study
Non-physical “bubble curtain” is deployed at divergence
of San Joaquin River and Old River in central California.
Acoustic Tag Results in Fisheries Research Friday Harbor, San Juan Islands – July 19, 2011
Thank them for this opportunity and the Phase I funding. We had fun and learned a lot.
Eel swimming path at Cabot Station (fall 2002); Eel ID 16 – Attempt No. 1/1 (forebay residence time = 1.72 min, mean turning angle = 35.6º, fractal index of tortuosity = 1.073, and turbine units operating = 2, 5 & 6). Eel ID 16 passed downstream through turbine unit 5.
Eel swimming path at Cabot Station (fall 2002); Eel ID 18 – Attempt No. 2/2 (forebay residence time = 34.97 min, mean turning angle = 53.9º, fractal index of tortuosity = 1.321, and turbine units operating = 2, 5 & 6). Eel ID 18 passed downstream through turbine unit 5.