Slides from JISC Digital Literacies programme meeting 16th October 2012 introducing asks and offers activity

1. Developing Digital Literacies
programme
What is expected?
Helen Beetham
October 2012

2. What is expected from DDL?
• Who is expecting?
• Challenges and priorities
• Developments in DL
• What are we really offering?
• The asks and offers process
2

3. Who is expecting?
• We are here in a representative capacity
• Institutions - why did they support your bid?
what’s in it for them? how does your project
support institutional priorities?
• Staff in the sector - through the Associations
and the different staff involved in Projects -
what do they expect? what do they need?
• Students in the sector
• JISC and other sectoral bodies

4. Institutional challenges
• Attract enough of ‘the right’ students: e.g.
AAB, non-restricted, ‘new markets’, regional
• Retain students by meeting their needs/
expectations
• Progress students to achieve graduate
attributes/employment
• Build capacity from existing resources
(including restructure/new roles)
• Generate long-term partnerships
• ...

5. Institutional challenges
What is your institution asking for?

6. Systemic challenges
• Demonstrate value (to individuals and
society) including value for money
• Remain globally competitive as new
providers gain market share
• Update offer (‘relevant’) while remaining
distinctive (‘traditional’ ‘academic’)
• Deal with multiplying uncertainties
• Student as consumer - new contract,
challenges for development?
• ...

7. Systemic challenges

8. Sector challenges
What can we offer ‘UK HE’?

9. Challenges for people
in the system
• Staff
– insecurity, restructuring, job losses
– need to ‘future proof’ role and career but...
– less time/space/reward to innovate?
• Students
– power/choice depends on grades
– developing identity / career path in uncertainty
– less time/space/inclination to innovate?
– debt = study+work (for most)
– relevance of digital skills to life goals?
• What are the challenges of developing people
in this context?

10. Personal challenges
What do your stakeholders really
want from this programme?

11. Developments in DL
• Our six themes:
academic practice | professional practice
assessing/progressing DLs | bring your own skills
student pioneers | digitally literate leaders
• International convergence:
EU Digital Competence project, digitalliteracy/gov,
Digital Champion (MLF), etc
• More awareness
DL as ‘embedded in everything we do’
• ... more cynicism?
‘nothing special’, ‘happening anyway’ ‘kids are alright’
• More enhancement (RoI?), less WP?

12. What are we really offering?
• Conceptual frameworks - understand DLs / your DL
setting
• Competence frameworks (for staff and students) -
map what you’re doing already and fill the gaps
• Staff development resources - try these
• Student development resources - try these
• Case studies, examples - this is what ‘doing DL
development well’ looks like
• Themes, findings and lessons learned - this is how
it was for us
• Models and methods for embedding digital literacies
institutionally - recommendations and alternatives

13. What are we really offering?
Design studio pages

14. The asks and offers process
• Refine your asks now and keep them handy
institutions | people | sector
• Projects: assign 1 person to making the offers
and 1 to asking - you can swap halfway
• Associations: focus on asks for your members
• Askers: visit as many stalls as you can, and fill
in feedback slips for each item you review
• Offerers: collate your slips - and use them to
refine your offer later
• We will reconvene to discuss: what we’ve asked
for, what we’re offering, what the gaps are
14

15. Developing Digital Literacies
programme
Interim report guidelines
Helen Beetham & Jay Dempster
October 2012

16. Some general philosophies/
goals
• Synthesis and evaluation is in itself part of
the change process
• Accountability is a growing area of need for
funded programmes.
• Clarity, relevance of key lessons/messages
not needless complexity
• Inspire & inform - illustrate & animate your
findings, link to outputs
• Offer useful, meaningful, actionable

17. Gathering, analysing, reporting
outcomes
collating & evidencing making sense of & verifying
quantitative ‘deliverables’ qualitative ‘lessons’
(accountability >> institutions/ (knowledge transfer >> programme/
partners/funders) funders, the HE sector)
gathering feedback on project processes, practices and outcomes
across the Programme
(developmental >> programme team/funders)

19. Writing the report narrative
• 1. Be interesting – this is not just a day job, unexpected, exciting or aggravating
things happen, communicate the ‘human’ element, use examples, avoid waffle/needless
detail, convey the excitement of change rather than just writing to sub-headings.
• 2. Be research-like – investigative as well as pragmatic, micro-theories based on
observations, hunches and conversations as well as on findings and solid evidence.
Record them. This is what makes projects interesting.
• 3. Be communicative – the first audience for reports is the rest of the programme,
use them as critical friends, feedback from them is evidence of what is interesting &
useful.
• 4. Be meaningful – think about what project activities, outcomes and lessons might
mean for people beyond your organisation, the wider sector (graphic above might help).
• 5. Be opportunistic – look for ways of recording what you need to record that don't
take up too much time (iterative reporting, blogging, capturing conversations/outputs,
routine monitoring/usage, turning the best bits into an 'update')
• 6. Be pragmatic – in terms of rigour (reliable, valid data/methods determine the
quality of the evidence produced)
• 7. Be ‘big picture’ esq – related to baseline evidence, seek overarching relevance/
value

20. Checklist questions - 1
• Is your evidence facilitating discussion or
decision making/action taking?
– What kinds of discussion & feedback is your
project generating and how are you recording/
capturing this?
– How useful is it? (to the work of your project,
institutional change, partners/associations
engagement/contribution, to students, to the
wider sector)
– Is your synthesis of findings and evaluation

21. Checklist questions - 2
• What kind of outputs are you producing?
– What ways are you providing ‘snapshots’ &
‘sense making’ on processes & outcomes
synthesised across your project?
– Are you tagging topics and key audiences of
findings for later synthesis/dissemination?
– How are you critiquing the data/evidence
you are gathering?

22. Checklist questions - 3
• Does the evidence add up to something?
– Is it fit-for-purpose and supporting claims you are making
about change and impact?
– Are you communicating outcomes/benefits or defending a
situation or finding in the project?
– How are you filtering/tagging what is valuable and relevant
to your project/strategic objectives and stakeholders as
you go along?
– Are you generating an overall picture of the (emerging)
impact of the work?