SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
WHITE PAPER




Data Storage in the Cloud – Can you Afford
Not To?
Data Storage in the Cloud – Can You Afford Not To?




EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Storing data in the cloud using a Whitewater™ cloud storage gateway from Riverbed Technology overcomes what is becoming a
serious challenge for IT departments: how to manage the vast, and ever-growing, amount of data that must be protected.
Whitewater eliminates concerns about data security, data transmission speeds over the Internet, and data availability, while
providing great flexibility and a favorable return on investment. Moving data to the cloud replaces the high costs of tape and disk
storage systems with a pay-as-you-go cloud storage tier. This paper makes the business case for cloud storage, outlining where
capital and operational costs can be eliminated or avoided by using the cloud for backup and archive storage.


Cloud storage offers advantages
Cloud computing has a wide variety of definitions today. Simply put, in this paper, cloud computing refers to accessing servers or
storage over the Internet for the purposes of running applications or storing data. This analysis looks at the viability of using the
cloud for data storage, specifically pay-as-you-go data storage services from providers such as Amazon, AT&T, Nirvanix and EMC
Atmos, including use for backup, recovery, replication and disaster recovery (DR) operations. (Some would call this as a “public”
cloud since these providers open their services to all.)

As a new delivery model for IT services, cloud computing is still being evaluated by most CIOs. Its primary advantage is the ability
to increase IT capacity without investments in new infrastructure, personnel and software licenses. Common concerns include the
fact that proprietary, critical data leaves the premises. This is addressed in Cloud storage concerns, and how they can be
addressed, below.

For data storage, cloud computing offers a safe, attractive and affordable solution to what is becoming a serious challenge for IT
departments: how to manage the vast and ever-growing amount of data that must be backed up and maintained. Even
organizations with an effective data storage process currently in place may find these processes overwhelmed by data volumes in
the future. Riverbed customers report that their data increases by 40 to 60 percent annually, putting their storage systems on the
fast track to full capacity and obsolescence.

According to Riverbed customers, some of the advantages gained by using cloud storage include:

    Pay-as-you go capacity costs
    Data accessibility from anywhere
    Automatic off-site copy of data for DR
    Unprecedented flexibility and scalability
    Low cost due to economies of scale of cloud storage providers
    High availability due to the redundancy built into cloud storage


Cloud storage concerns, and how they can be addressed
Four key concerns dominate views today on storing an organization’s data in the public cloud. Of these, security is the greatest.
Data must be safe during transmission to and from the cloud, as well as while it resides within the cloud. Slow data transmission
speeds across the WAN are another concern. Moving terabytes of raw data to and from the cloud can be very time consuming,
making it a significant problem. Third, data must be available when needed. Data inaccessibility can have a very significant
business impact. Finally, the concern around the return on investment (ROI) that will be gained by use of cloud storage which is
especially acute during times of shrinking IT budgets.

Riverbed recently introduced cloud storage gateway technology that addresses each of these cloud storage concerns, making the
public cloud a feasible storage tier for most organizations. Riverbed® Whitewater® cloud storage gateways, available in both
hardware and virtual configurations, require no change to a company’s existing backup infrastructure. On the front-end,
Whitewater appliances present themselves as CIFS shares or NFS mounts to the existing backup software and appears as a
standard disk target to the backup software. At the back-end, they have built-in support for APIs from Amazon Web Services S3,
AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service Microsoft Windows Azure, Nirvanix Cloud Storage Network, Rackspace Cloud Files, clouds
based on EMC Atmos or OpenStack (Swift) object storage. These compatibilities allow Whitewater to be immediately deployed in
most IT environments.




© 2011 Riverbed Technology. All rights reserved.                                                                                      1
Data Storage in the Cloud – Can You Afford Not To?




Whitewater cloud storage gateways address public cloud storage concerns in the following ways:

Data security. Whitewater cloud storage gateways encrypt data in-flight to the cloud with SSL v3 and at rest using 256-bit AES
encryption. This dual-level encryption ensures that any data moved into cloud storage will not be compromised and creates end-
to-end security. Whitewater gateways leverage an innovative key management system that allows organizations to carefully
manage data security. Encryption keys are kept safe by IT management.

Transmission speed across the WAN. Whitewater cloud storage gateways leverage existing Riverbed data acceleration
technology, including the industry-proven WAN optimization and deduplication functionality in the Steelhead® product line, to
speed the transfer of data to and from the cloud. Whitewater appliances receive data from the backup application, deduplicate it,
compress and encrypt it, store it in a local disk cache, translate it to cloud protocols, and then send to the cloud, minimizing
transmission time to and from the cloud. The deduplication technology (inline, variable-length, byte-level) reduces the amount of
data sent to the cloud by 10 to 30 times, on average. In addition, because cloud storage providers charge based on the amount
of storage capacity, deduplication reduces the cost of using it as a storage tier.

Data availability. Because Whitewater cloud storage gateways are often implemented as part of a DR solution, it is critical that
companies can access data as quickly as possible, wherever it resides. Whitewater gateways use a local disk cache to store the
most recent backups. Because most restores are from recent backups, typical data retrieval is from the local cache. In the
uncommon case where the backup data needed is no longer within the local cache, the Whitewater appliance will supplement
whatever data is no longer in the cache by pulling the required data from the cloud. The Whitewater appliance minimizes the
amount of cloud-based data needed in order to satisfy this type of restore.


The business case for cloud storage
Compared to tape or disk backup, storing data in the public cloud has been shown to reduce costs and backup time in a number
of ways. Listed below are some examples, along with estimates of avoided costs gathered from Whitewater users:

Tape backup (assuming LTO-4 tape with 120 MB/sec throughput and 800 GB capacity)

    LTO-4 drives ($10,000/drive)
    LTO-4 tape library ($30,000 each)
    LTO-4 tape ($30/tape)
    Tape maintenance (18% to 23% of total cost of tape system)
    Off-site tape vaulting ($200 - $500 per /month)
    Power and cooling costs

Disk backup

    Storage array ($5,000 to $150,000, often $1,000 per TB for enterprise class storage)
    Storage array maintenance (9% to18% of the price of the array)
    Power and cooling costs

The “set and forget” nature of the Whitewater cloud storage gateways compares favorably to the on-going labor involved with tape
and disk storage. If labor cost is estimated at $80,000 per man-year, and with the assumption of one person needed for every 50
terabytes of stored data, labor cost savings from using Whitewater from labor alone can be substantial.

Other advantages can be harder to quantify, but still increase the ROI from using Whitewater cloud storage gateways. Because
backups are faster than tape due to the data being written to an appliance (rather than a tape drive), more frequent backups are
possible, making the recovery point closer to the current time. Another advantage is that writing data to the Whitewater gateway
generally improves the number of successful backup jobs by 5 to 10 percent by eliminating a number of tape-related issues that
often cause backups to fail, saving labor and minimizing risk for the organization by reducing the amount of time a server is
unprotected.




© 2011 Riverbed Technology. All rights reserved.                                                                                    2
Data Storage in the Cloud – Can You Afford Not To?




Another area where Whitewater has the potential for significant cost savings is legal compliance. Audits and legal action typically
put a hold on all data, which means that companies using tape backup can no longer reuse these tapes. It is not unheard of that
data can be on legal hold for several years, possibly representing tens of thousands of dollars worth of tape. During a legal
action, using a Whitewater gateway and storing the data in the cloud replaces the enormous cost of tape infrastructure and
vaulting with the per-use fee of the cloud storage provider.

For companies currently using disk backup, switching to Whitewater allows them to reclaim disk-based storage for other uses and
avoid buying disk to forward provision in anticipation of future needs.

As part of a DR strategy, companies will often use a replication application to replicate their data to a second site and also back
up to tape to provide recovery in the event that the replicated data is erased through human or software errors. With a Whitewater
gateway writing data to the cloud, the tape system is unnecessary; the cloud is the replication backup.


Results from Riverbed customers
International Justice Mission
International Justice Mission is a human rights agency that secures justice for victims of slavery, sexual exploitation and other
forms of violent oppression. The agency’s mission encompasses victim relief, perpetrator accountability, victim aftercare, and
structural transformation.

IJM upgraded from a tape backup system to a Whitewater cloud storage gateway             “Whitewater lets us do backups and restores
as part of the agency’s transfer of critical systems from its Washington D.C.            without anyone on site,” McPeek says. “And it
headquarters to a lights-out data center. “One of the holdups was that we needed         saves us from having to hire a backup
a backup system that we could manage without having someone physically                   engineer to manage the system.”
present, or having to hire additional staff,” explains Chris McPeek, manager of
global systems and infrastructure at IJM.

After getting Whitewater up and running – “one of the easiest installs ever,” according to McPeek – IJM was able to eliminate all of
the labor associated with the previous tape backup system, such as rotating the tapes in the catalog and moving them off-site.
“Whitewater lets us do backups and restores without anyone on site,” McPeek says. “And it saves us from having to hire a backup
engineer to manage the system.” Costs avoided: salary for an entry-level engineer and tape transport and vaulting.

Another significant cost savings involves the agency’s 15 field offices. Prior to deploying the Whitewater gateway, McPeek was
planning to acquire tape backup systems or network attached storage (NAS) devices for each of those sites. Instead, a backup
server running Symantec Backup Exec pulls data in from all of the field offices and writes it to the Whitewater gateway, which then
sends it to the cloud. “Essentially we just point our backups at the Whitewater appliance and let it rip, and off it goes out into the
Internet,” he adds. Costs avoided: backup systems for 15 offices.

IJM’s data consists, in part, of crucial information related to the prosecutions of perpetrators. It must be retained for as long as
necessary until the cases go to trial. The volume of data at IJM grows by about 40 to 60 percent per year. Currently the amount of
data being backed up runs about 4.5 terabytes. It would not have taken too long before the previous tape backup system was
overwhelmed. By going with Whitewater, which scales up easily, the company will avoid large capital expenses related to addition
tape backup equipment. Costs avoided: tape system upgrade.

For IJM, whose mission is saving lives, all these avoided costs represent more than a healthier balance sheet. Says McPeek, “We
can almost measure per person how many lives are saved because of having Riverbed technology such as Whitewater in our
network.”

Mid-size Company
The systems administrator at this company was just about to request approval of a 4x increase in physical data storage capacity
when he learned about Whitewater. The company was using a tape backup system at the time, and the growing amount of data
being backed up was going to exceed the system’s limit. Increasing the capacity was going to cost several hundred thousand
dollars.

That would be added to the acquisition and on-going costs of the tape system which, for this company, included: 48 tapes/week at
a cost of $30 each, the 10-drive tape library ($100,000 for the ten drives and $30,000 to $40,000 for the library), off-site tape




© 2011 Riverbed Technology. All rights reserved.                                                                                      3
Data Storage in the Cloud – Can You Afford Not To?




storage (hundreds of dollars per month), and approximately one-half of one full-time employee’s salary to manage the process.
Other costs included the off-site provider’s fee to deliver a tape for a restore ($400 to $1,000, depending on how quickly the
company needed the tape) and new tape drives for those that needed to be replaced ($10,000/drive/every few years) due to
constant use.
                                                                                      Choosing to deploy Whitewater and cloud
Choosing to deploy Whitewater and cloud storage instead of upgrading the tape         storage instead of upgrading the tape system
system was “a real game changer for us,” says the systems administrator. It took      was “a real game changer for us,” says the
him less than half an hour to set up the Whitewater appliance which, unlike the       systems administrator. It took him less than
tape system, requires no on-going labor to manage. The deduplication                  half an hour to set up the Whitewater
performed by the Whitewater appliance greatly reduces the amount of data that         appliance which, unlike the tape system,
goes into cloud storage. The systems administrator reports an initial                 requires no on-going labor to manage. The
deduplication factor of approximately five, meaning that of the 150 terabytes of      deduplication performed by the Whitewater
data backed up at that time, his company only paid to store about 30 terabytes in     appliance greatly reduces the amount of data
the cloud. They expect their deduplication rate should keep improving as the          that goes into cloud storage.
Whitewater appliance sees the same data over and over, so that 30 terabytes
should grow very slowly over time.

Pump Solutions Group
Pump Solutions Group (PSG) is a global manufacturer of pumps with facilities in the U.S., Germany, China, India, and France.
When PSG needed to unify the disparate networks of its subsidiaries and build a common DR framework for the organization, the
company became an early adopter of a Whitewater, which the company deployed originally in its Wilden Pump subsidiary based
in California.

Before Whitewater was installed, the backup process at Wilden Pump began with disk-to-disk replication using either Dell
EqualLogic or an HP SAN for disk storage. Data from the disk was then copied to tape. Jeff Rountree, global network manager at
PSG, estimates the costs of the tape backup system at approximately $30,000 for the initial investment (tape libraries and tape
media) and $5,600 in annual maintenance and upkeep. Part of the annual maintenance and upkeep included approximately two
hours per week of someone’s time for managing the tapes. Those two hours a week have been freed up for higher value work.
Cost savings: $5600 per year plus 100 hours annually.

Rountree has found other areas where the Whitewater appliance saves money. One is in the amount the company pays to its
cloud storage provider, AT&T, each month. Because Whitewater deduplicates and compresses the backup data before sending it
to AT&T, the cost of cloud storage is much less than it would otherwise be. Explains Rountree: “The amount of data we back up is
around 1.2 terabytes, but what we put out to cloud ends up being only 100 gigabytes.” At the rate they are paying for cloud
storage (25 cents/gigabyte) that represents a savings of $275/month. Annual savings: $3,300.


Another savings relates to the company’s SANs. Using SANs for long-term storage           “I can do the same number now and do
is expensive, and now that Wilden Pump is storing data in the cloud, the company          them faster, and we are thinking about
does not need to purchase additional SANs. “EqualLogic is fairly inefficient when         doing full backups more frequently. With
doing replication,” Rountree says. “Space is reserved on the target EqualLogic for        Whitewater, more backup work gets
the source volume on the source EqualLogic, so even if there is only 80 gigabytes,        done in less time.”
for example, used on a 500-gigabyte source volume, 500 gigabytes are reserved
on the target EqualLogic that cannot be used.” In an example he related, 97
percent of delegated replication space on the SAN was empty but could not be used for anything else. “Considering an
EqualLogic would cost $30,000 to $75,000 or more, purchasing a SAN for long-term storage is a significant investment, and it
does not protect data as well as Whitewater does with off-site replication,” he adds. Costs avoided: $30,000 to $75,000.

With Whitewater appliances, backups run faster, so full backups can be done more frequently. And it is now possible to perform
multiple backups simultaneously. Rountree is evaluating how the company’s backup practices will change now that they have
Whitewater. “We used to limit how many backups we did at one time,” he says. “I can do the same number now and do them
faster, and we are thinking about doing full backups more frequently. With Whitewater, more backup work gets done in less time.”

For Rountree, who knows that the ultimate purpose of backed-up data is to be able to restore it when necessary, Whitewater gives
the company better protection for its data. “A huge advantage of Whitewater is how quickly we can restore data now,” he says.
“With tape, you can lose part of a week’s data depending on when you last backed up, which means you would lose the most




© 2011 Riverbed Technology. All rights reserved.                                                                                     4
Data Storage in the Cloud – Can You Afford Not To?




recent information. With Whitewater, a full restore can be done within an hour or two, and can be done from any location”. (Value:
the cost of lost data.)

Whitewater Cloud Storage Gateway Overview
Riverbed Whitewater cloud storage gateways allow organizations to eliminate tape, reduce costs, streamline administration and
improve disaster recovery readiness by leveraging the scalability, flexibility and pay-for-use pricing of cloud storage.

Disaster recovery capability is greatly improved by secure off-site storage within the public cloud without the expense of redundant
hardware, power, cooling and hosting costs. Backup data stored in the cloud is available anywhere with an internet connection to
provide fast, flexible recovery should the unexpected occur.

Whitewater safeguards data during transmission and at rest using secure socket layer V3 (SSLv3) technology and strong AES
256 bit encryption. This dual layer of security ensures that sensitive data is protected end-to-end.

Leveraging Riverbed’s industry leading deduplication, compression and optimization technologies, Whitewater gateways shrink
data set sizes by 10 to 30x on average, substantially reducing cloud storage costs while accelerating data transfers. This massive
reduction in data sets allows a single gateway to replace more than a petabyte of data stored on tape.

Whitewater gateways secure, optimize and accelerate backup and recovery to the cloud without changes to the existing
infrastructure. Whitewater acts as a broker to connect any of the following data protection applications to the following cloud
storage providers:

Data Protection Applications                                                Cloud Storage Providers
CA ARCserve, Commvault Simpana, EMC Networker, HP                           Amazon Web Services S3, AT&T Synaptic Storage as a
DataProtector, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager, Quest vRanger,                   Service, Microsoft Windows Azure, Nirvanix Cloud Storage
Symantec NetBackup and Backup Exec, Veeam Backup and                        Network, Rackspace Cloud Files, clouds based on EMC
Replication                                                                 Atmos or OpenStack (Swift) object storage.


Conclusion
The public cloud can offer a safe, attractive and affordable solution for the storage of backup data sets. Concerns around
security, transmission speed, and accessibility exist but each can be overcome by the application of technologies that exist today
from industry leading vendors such as Riverbed. From interviews with Riverbed Whitewater cloud storage gateway users, key
benefits such as reduced system management requirements, avoidance of new tape and storage array purchases and the ability
to safely store data off site provide a substantial return on investment. Cost savings continue to accrue by large reductions in data
set size by use of deduplication and the resulting reduction in cloud storage costs. Customers leveraging Whitewater gateways
are pleased that they have moved their backup data sets from tape technologies to the public cloud, for from their experience,
they can no longer afford not to.




About Riverbed
Riverbed delivers performance for the globally connected enterprise. With Riverbed, enterprises can successfully and intelligently
implement strategic initiatives such as virtualization, consolidation, cloud computing, and disaster recovery without fear of
compromising performance. By giving enterprises the platform they need to understand, optimize and consolidate their IT,
Riverbed helps enterprises to build a fast, fluid and dynamic IT architecture that aligns with the business needs of the
organization. Additional information about Riverbed (NASDAQ: RVBD) is available at www.riverbed.com.


                               Riverbed Technology, Inc.   Riverbed Technology Ltd.    Riverbed Technology Pte. Ltd.   Riverbed Technology K.K.
                               199 Fremont Street          One Thames Valley           391A Orchard Road #22-06/10     Shiba-Koen Plaza Building 9F
                               San Francisco, CA 94105     Wokingham Road, Level 2     Ngee Ann City Tower A           3-6-9, Shiba, Minato-ku
                               Tel: (415) 247-8800         Bracknell. RG42 1NG         Singapore 238873                Tokyo, Japan 105-0014
                               www.riverbed.com            United Kingdom              Tel: +65 6508-7400              Tel: +81 3 5419 1990
                                                           Tel: +44 1344 401900




© 2011 Riverbed Technology. All rights reserved.                                                                                                      5

More Related Content

What's hot

Strongbox Data Storage Podcast
Strongbox Data Storage PodcastStrongbox Data Storage Podcast
Strongbox Data Storage Podcastinside-BigData.com
 
Hu Yoshida - Storage Trends and Directions (Storage Expo 2010)
Hu Yoshida - Storage Trends and Directions (Storage Expo 2010)Hu Yoshida - Storage Trends and Directions (Storage Expo 2010)
Hu Yoshida - Storage Trends and Directions (Storage Expo 2010)VNU Exhibitions Europe
 
Data Domain Architecture
Data Domain ArchitectureData Domain Architecture
Data Domain Architecturekoesteruk22
 
Copy Data Management & Storage Efficiency - Ravi Namboori
Copy Data Management & Storage Efficiency - Ravi NambooriCopy Data Management & Storage Efficiency - Ravi Namboori
Copy Data Management & Storage Efficiency - Ravi NambooriRavi namboori
 
Move your on-premises data today with Buurst
Move your on-premises data today with BuurstMove your on-premises data today with Buurst
Move your on-premises data today with BuurstMH Riad
 
Net App Syncsort Integrated Backup Solution Sheet
Net App Syncsort Integrated Backup Solution SheetNet App Syncsort Integrated Backup Solution Sheet
Net App Syncsort Integrated Backup Solution SheetMichael Hudak
 
Archiving is a No-brainer - Bloor Analyst and RainStor Executive Discuss
Archiving is a No-brainer - Bloor Analyst and RainStor Executive DiscussArchiving is a No-brainer - Bloor Analyst and RainStor Executive Discuss
Archiving is a No-brainer - Bloor Analyst and RainStor Executive DiscussRainStor
 
Audax Group: CIO Perspectives - Managing The Copy Data Explosion
Audax Group: CIO Perspectives - Managing The Copy Data ExplosionAudax Group: CIO Perspectives - Managing The Copy Data Explosion
Audax Group: CIO Perspectives - Managing The Copy Data Explosionactifio
 
Why 2015 is the Year of Copy Data - What are the requirements?
Why 2015 is the Year of Copy Data - What are the requirements?Why 2015 is the Year of Copy Data - What are the requirements?
Why 2015 is the Year of Copy Data - What are the requirements?Storage Switzerland
 
ClearSky - Value to Manged Service Providers
ClearSky - Value to Manged Service Providers ClearSky - Value to Manged Service Providers
ClearSky - Value to Manged Service Providers rbcummings
 
5-16-13 Using the DuraCloud Service to archive content in Glacier Presentatio...
5-16-13 Using the DuraCloud Service to archive content in Glacier Presentatio...5-16-13 Using the DuraCloud Service to archive content in Glacier Presentatio...
5-16-13 Using the DuraCloud Service to archive content in Glacier Presentatio...DuraSpace
 
Storage Conference 08 V2
Storage Conference 08 V2Storage Conference 08 V2
Storage Conference 08 V2Pini Cohen
 
IDC Whitepaper: Achieving the full Business Value of Virtualization
IDC Whitepaper: Achieving the full Business Value of VirtualizationIDC Whitepaper: Achieving the full Business Value of Virtualization
IDC Whitepaper: Achieving the full Business Value of VirtualizationDataCore Software
 
SPONSORED WORKSHOP by Cleversafe from Structure:Data 2012
SPONSORED WORKSHOP by Cleversafe from Structure:Data 2012SPONSORED WORKSHOP by Cleversafe from Structure:Data 2012
SPONSORED WORKSHOP by Cleversafe from Structure:Data 2012Gigaom
 
Scalability: Lenovo ThinkServer RD540 system and Lenovo ThinkServer SA120 sto...
Scalability: Lenovo ThinkServer RD540 system and Lenovo ThinkServer SA120 sto...Scalability: Lenovo ThinkServer RD540 system and Lenovo ThinkServer SA120 sto...
Scalability: Lenovo ThinkServer RD540 system and Lenovo ThinkServer SA120 sto...Principled Technologies
 
Storage Virtualization: Towards an Efficient and Scalable Framework
Storage Virtualization: Towards an Efficient and Scalable FrameworkStorage Virtualization: Towards an Efficient and Scalable Framework
Storage Virtualization: Towards an Efficient and Scalable FrameworkCSCJournals
 

What's hot (20)

Strongbox Data Storage Podcast
Strongbox Data Storage PodcastStrongbox Data Storage Podcast
Strongbox Data Storage Podcast
 
Hu Yoshida - Storage Trends and Directions (Storage Expo 2010)
Hu Yoshida - Storage Trends and Directions (Storage Expo 2010)Hu Yoshida - Storage Trends and Directions (Storage Expo 2010)
Hu Yoshida - Storage Trends and Directions (Storage Expo 2010)
 
Data Domain Architecture
Data Domain ArchitectureData Domain Architecture
Data Domain Architecture
 
Copy Data Management & Storage Efficiency - Ravi Namboori
Copy Data Management & Storage Efficiency - Ravi NambooriCopy Data Management & Storage Efficiency - Ravi Namboori
Copy Data Management & Storage Efficiency - Ravi Namboori
 
Solving Big Data Problems
Solving Big Data ProblemsSolving Big Data Problems
Solving Big Data Problems
 
Move your on-premises data today with Buurst
Move your on-premises data today with BuurstMove your on-premises data today with Buurst
Move your on-premises data today with Buurst
 
Connect July-Aug 2014
Connect July-Aug 2014Connect July-Aug 2014
Connect July-Aug 2014
 
Software defined storage
Software defined storageSoftware defined storage
Software defined storage
 
Net App Syncsort Integrated Backup Solution Sheet
Net App Syncsort Integrated Backup Solution SheetNet App Syncsort Integrated Backup Solution Sheet
Net App Syncsort Integrated Backup Solution Sheet
 
OUTBOARD SERVERS
OUTBOARD SERVERSOUTBOARD SERVERS
OUTBOARD SERVERS
 
Archiving is a No-brainer - Bloor Analyst and RainStor Executive Discuss
Archiving is a No-brainer - Bloor Analyst and RainStor Executive DiscussArchiving is a No-brainer - Bloor Analyst and RainStor Executive Discuss
Archiving is a No-brainer - Bloor Analyst and RainStor Executive Discuss
 
Audax Group: CIO Perspectives - Managing The Copy Data Explosion
Audax Group: CIO Perspectives - Managing The Copy Data ExplosionAudax Group: CIO Perspectives - Managing The Copy Data Explosion
Audax Group: CIO Perspectives - Managing The Copy Data Explosion
 
Why 2015 is the Year of Copy Data - What are the requirements?
Why 2015 is the Year of Copy Data - What are the requirements?Why 2015 is the Year of Copy Data - What are the requirements?
Why 2015 is the Year of Copy Data - What are the requirements?
 
ClearSky - Value to Manged Service Providers
ClearSky - Value to Manged Service Providers ClearSky - Value to Manged Service Providers
ClearSky - Value to Manged Service Providers
 
5-16-13 Using the DuraCloud Service to archive content in Glacier Presentatio...
5-16-13 Using the DuraCloud Service to archive content in Glacier Presentatio...5-16-13 Using the DuraCloud Service to archive content in Glacier Presentatio...
5-16-13 Using the DuraCloud Service to archive content in Glacier Presentatio...
 
Storage Conference 08 V2
Storage Conference 08 V2Storage Conference 08 V2
Storage Conference 08 V2
 
IDC Whitepaper: Achieving the full Business Value of Virtualization
IDC Whitepaper: Achieving the full Business Value of VirtualizationIDC Whitepaper: Achieving the full Business Value of Virtualization
IDC Whitepaper: Achieving the full Business Value of Virtualization
 
SPONSORED WORKSHOP by Cleversafe from Structure:Data 2012
SPONSORED WORKSHOP by Cleversafe from Structure:Data 2012SPONSORED WORKSHOP by Cleversafe from Structure:Data 2012
SPONSORED WORKSHOP by Cleversafe from Structure:Data 2012
 
Scalability: Lenovo ThinkServer RD540 system and Lenovo ThinkServer SA120 sto...
Scalability: Lenovo ThinkServer RD540 system and Lenovo ThinkServer SA120 sto...Scalability: Lenovo ThinkServer RD540 system and Lenovo ThinkServer SA120 sto...
Scalability: Lenovo ThinkServer RD540 system and Lenovo ThinkServer SA120 sto...
 
Storage Virtualization: Towards an Efficient and Scalable Framework
Storage Virtualization: Towards an Efficient and Scalable FrameworkStorage Virtualization: Towards an Efficient and Scalable Framework
Storage Virtualization: Towards an Efficient and Scalable Framework
 

Similar to Data Storage in the Cloud - Can You Afford Not To

NetBackup CloudCatalyst: Efficient, Cost-Effective Deduplication to the Cloud
NetBackup CloudCatalyst: Efficient, Cost-Effective Deduplication to the CloudNetBackup CloudCatalyst: Efficient, Cost-Effective Deduplication to the Cloud
NetBackup CloudCatalyst: Efficient, Cost-Effective Deduplication to the CloudVeritas Technologies LLC
 
NetBackup CloudCatalyst – efficient, cost-effective deduplication to the cloud
NetBackup CloudCatalyst – efficient, cost-effective deduplication to the cloudNetBackup CloudCatalyst – efficient, cost-effective deduplication to the cloud
NetBackup CloudCatalyst – efficient, cost-effective deduplication to the cloudVeritas Technologies LLC
 
E newsletter promise_&_challenges_of_cloud storage-2
E newsletter promise_&_challenges_of_cloud storage-2E newsletter promise_&_challenges_of_cloud storage-2
E newsletter promise_&_challenges_of_cloud storage-2Anil Vasudeva
 
BackupRestoreInfographic.pdf
BackupRestoreInfographic.pdfBackupRestoreInfographic.pdf
BackupRestoreInfographic.pdfssuser4f79b8
 
Insider's Guide- Building a Virtualized Storage Service
Insider's Guide- Building a Virtualized Storage ServiceInsider's Guide- Building a Virtualized Storage Service
Insider's Guide- Building a Virtualized Storage ServiceDataCore Software
 
Backup and Recovery with Cloud-Native Deduplication and Use Cases from the Fi...
Backup and Recovery with Cloud-Native Deduplication and Use Cases from the Fi...Backup and Recovery with Cloud-Native Deduplication and Use Cases from the Fi...
Backup and Recovery with Cloud-Native Deduplication and Use Cases from the Fi...Amazon Web Services
 
Riverbed Whitewater Datasheet
Riverbed Whitewater DatasheetRiverbed Whitewater Datasheet
Riverbed Whitewater Datasheetlaurenfortune
 
IRJET- A Survey on Remote Data Possession Verification Protocol in Cloud Storage
IRJET- A Survey on Remote Data Possession Verification Protocol in Cloud StorageIRJET- A Survey on Remote Data Possession Verification Protocol in Cloud Storage
IRJET- A Survey on Remote Data Possession Verification Protocol in Cloud StorageIRJET Journal
 
Removing Storage Related Barriers to Server and Desktop Virtualization
Removing Storage Related Barriers to Server and Desktop VirtualizationRemoving Storage Related Barriers to Server and Desktop Virtualization
Removing Storage Related Barriers to Server and Desktop VirtualizationDataCore Software
 
Pros And Cons Of Cloud-Based Security Solutions.pptx
Pros And Cons Of Cloud-Based Security Solutions.pptxPros And Cons Of Cloud-Based Security Solutions.pptx
Pros And Cons Of Cloud-Based Security Solutions.pptxMetaorange
 
Data Back-Up and Recovery Techniques for Cloud Server Using Seed Block Algorithm
Data Back-Up and Recovery Techniques for Cloud Server Using Seed Block AlgorithmData Back-Up and Recovery Techniques for Cloud Server Using Seed Block Algorithm
Data Back-Up and Recovery Techniques for Cloud Server Using Seed Block AlgorithmIJERA Editor
 
Distributed Large Dataset Deployment with Improved Load Balancing and Perform...
Distributed Large Dataset Deployment with Improved Load Balancing and Perform...Distributed Large Dataset Deployment with Improved Load Balancing and Perform...
Distributed Large Dataset Deployment with Improved Load Balancing and Perform...IJERA Editor
 
DATASHEET▶ Enterprise Cloud Backup & Recovery with Symantec NetBackup
DATASHEET▶ Enterprise Cloud Backup & Recovery with Symantec NetBackupDATASHEET▶ Enterprise Cloud Backup & Recovery with Symantec NetBackup
DATASHEET▶ Enterprise Cloud Backup & Recovery with Symantec NetBackupSymantec
 

Similar to Data Storage in the Cloud - Can You Afford Not To (20)

NetBackup CloudCatalyst: Efficient, Cost-Effective Deduplication to the Cloud
NetBackup CloudCatalyst: Efficient, Cost-Effective Deduplication to the CloudNetBackup CloudCatalyst: Efficient, Cost-Effective Deduplication to the Cloud
NetBackup CloudCatalyst: Efficient, Cost-Effective Deduplication to the Cloud
 
NetBackup CloudCatalyst – efficient, cost-effective deduplication to the cloud
NetBackup CloudCatalyst – efficient, cost-effective deduplication to the cloudNetBackup CloudCatalyst – efficient, cost-effective deduplication to the cloud
NetBackup CloudCatalyst – efficient, cost-effective deduplication to the cloud
 
E newsletter promise_&_challenges_of_cloud storage-2
E newsletter promise_&_challenges_of_cloud storage-2E newsletter promise_&_challenges_of_cloud storage-2
E newsletter promise_&_challenges_of_cloud storage-2
 
BackupRestoreInfographic.pdf
BackupRestoreInfographic.pdfBackupRestoreInfographic.pdf
BackupRestoreInfographic.pdf
 
Insider's Guide- Building a Virtualized Storage Service
Insider's Guide- Building a Virtualized Storage ServiceInsider's Guide- Building a Virtualized Storage Service
Insider's Guide- Building a Virtualized Storage Service
 
Mis cloud computing
Mis cloud computingMis cloud computing
Mis cloud computing
 
Unit II.pdf
Unit II.pdfUnit II.pdf
Unit II.pdf
 
Cloud Storage for all
Cloud Storage for allCloud Storage for all
Cloud Storage for all
 
Backup and Recovery with Cloud-Native Deduplication and Use Cases from the Fi...
Backup and Recovery with Cloud-Native Deduplication and Use Cases from the Fi...Backup and Recovery with Cloud-Native Deduplication and Use Cases from the Fi...
Backup and Recovery with Cloud-Native Deduplication and Use Cases from the Fi...
 
Riverbed Whitewater Datasheet
Riverbed Whitewater DatasheetRiverbed Whitewater Datasheet
Riverbed Whitewater Datasheet
 
IRJET- A Survey on Remote Data Possession Verification Protocol in Cloud Storage
IRJET- A Survey on Remote Data Possession Verification Protocol in Cloud StorageIRJET- A Survey on Remote Data Possession Verification Protocol in Cloud Storage
IRJET- A Survey on Remote Data Possession Verification Protocol in Cloud Storage
 
Today's Need To Manage The Storage Polymorphism
Today's Need To Manage The Storage PolymorphismToday's Need To Manage The Storage Polymorphism
Today's Need To Manage The Storage Polymorphism
 
Removing Storage Related Barriers to Server and Desktop Virtualization
Removing Storage Related Barriers to Server and Desktop VirtualizationRemoving Storage Related Barriers to Server and Desktop Virtualization
Removing Storage Related Barriers to Server and Desktop Virtualization
 
Pros And Cons Of Cloud-Based Security Solutions.pptx
Pros And Cons Of Cloud-Based Security Solutions.pptxPros And Cons Of Cloud-Based Security Solutions.pptx
Pros And Cons Of Cloud-Based Security Solutions.pptx
 
Data Back-Up and Recovery Techniques for Cloud Server Using Seed Block Algorithm
Data Back-Up and Recovery Techniques for Cloud Server Using Seed Block AlgorithmData Back-Up and Recovery Techniques for Cloud Server Using Seed Block Algorithm
Data Back-Up and Recovery Techniques for Cloud Server Using Seed Block Algorithm
 
Disaster recovery toolkit final version
Disaster recovery toolkit final versionDisaster recovery toolkit final version
Disaster recovery toolkit final version
 
Distributed Large Dataset Deployment with Improved Load Balancing and Perform...
Distributed Large Dataset Deployment with Improved Load Balancing and Perform...Distributed Large Dataset Deployment with Improved Load Balancing and Perform...
Distributed Large Dataset Deployment with Improved Load Balancing and Perform...
 
DATASHEET▶ Enterprise Cloud Backup & Recovery with Symantec NetBackup
DATASHEET▶ Enterprise Cloud Backup & Recovery with Symantec NetBackupDATASHEET▶ Enterprise Cloud Backup & Recovery with Symantec NetBackup
DATASHEET▶ Enterprise Cloud Backup & Recovery with Symantec NetBackup
 
Group 3 (Finals)
Group 3 (Finals)Group 3 (Finals)
Group 3 (Finals)
 
Abstract
AbstractAbstract
Abstract
 

More from Accenture

Certify 2014trends-report
Certify 2014trends-reportCertify 2014trends-report
Certify 2014trends-reportAccenture
 
Calabrio analyze
Calabrio analyzeCalabrio analyze
Calabrio analyzeAccenture
 
Tier 2 net app baseline design standard revised nov 2011
Tier 2 net app baseline design standard   revised nov 2011Tier 2 net app baseline design standard   revised nov 2011
Tier 2 net app baseline design standard revised nov 2011Accenture
 
Perf stat windows
Perf stat windowsPerf stat windows
Perf stat windowsAccenture
 
Performance problems on ethernet networks when the e0m management interface i...
Performance problems on ethernet networks when the e0m management interface i...Performance problems on ethernet networks when the e0m management interface i...
Performance problems on ethernet networks when the e0m management interface i...Accenture
 
NetApp system installation workbook Spokane
NetApp system installation workbook SpokaneNetApp system installation workbook Spokane
NetApp system installation workbook SpokaneAccenture
 
Migrate volume in akfiler7
Migrate volume in akfiler7Migrate volume in akfiler7
Migrate volume in akfiler7Accenture
 
Migrate vol in akfiler7
Migrate vol in akfiler7Migrate vol in akfiler7
Migrate vol in akfiler7Accenture
 
Data storage requirements AK
Data storage requirements AKData storage requirements AK
Data storage requirements AKAccenture
 
C mode class
C mode classC mode class
C mode classAccenture
 
Akfiler upgrades providence july 2012
Akfiler upgrades providence july 2012Akfiler upgrades providence july 2012
Akfiler upgrades providence july 2012Accenture
 
Reporting demo
Reporting demoReporting demo
Reporting demoAccenture
 
Net app virtualization preso
Net app virtualization presoNet app virtualization preso
Net app virtualization presoAccenture
 
Providence net app upgrade plan PPMC
Providence net app upgrade plan PPMCProvidence net app upgrade plan PPMC
Providence net app upgrade plan PPMCAccenture
 
WSC Net App storage for windows challenges and solutions
WSC Net App storage for windows challenges and solutionsWSC Net App storage for windows challenges and solutions
WSC Net App storage for windows challenges and solutionsAccenture
 
50,000-seat_VMware_view_deployment
50,000-seat_VMware_view_deployment50,000-seat_VMware_view_deployment
50,000-seat_VMware_view_deploymentAccenture
 
Tr 3998 -deployment_guide_for_hosted_shared_desktops_and_on-demand_applicatio...
Tr 3998 -deployment_guide_for_hosted_shared_desktops_and_on-demand_applicatio...Tr 3998 -deployment_guide_for_hosted_shared_desktops_and_on-demand_applicatio...
Tr 3998 -deployment_guide_for_hosted_shared_desktops_and_on-demand_applicatio...Accenture
 
Tr 3749 -net_app_storage_best_practices_for_v_mware_vsphere,_dec_11
Tr 3749 -net_app_storage_best_practices_for_v_mware_vsphere,_dec_11Tr 3749 -net_app_storage_best_practices_for_v_mware_vsphere,_dec_11
Tr 3749 -net_app_storage_best_practices_for_v_mware_vsphere,_dec_11Accenture
 
Snap mirror source to tape to destination scenario
Snap mirror source to tape to destination scenarioSnap mirror source to tape to destination scenario
Snap mirror source to tape to destination scenarioAccenture
 

More from Accenture (20)

Certify 2014trends-report
Certify 2014trends-reportCertify 2014trends-report
Certify 2014trends-report
 
Calabrio analyze
Calabrio analyzeCalabrio analyze
Calabrio analyze
 
Tier 2 net app baseline design standard revised nov 2011
Tier 2 net app baseline design standard   revised nov 2011Tier 2 net app baseline design standard   revised nov 2011
Tier 2 net app baseline design standard revised nov 2011
 
Perf stat windows
Perf stat windowsPerf stat windows
Perf stat windows
 
Performance problems on ethernet networks when the e0m management interface i...
Performance problems on ethernet networks when the e0m management interface i...Performance problems on ethernet networks when the e0m management interface i...
Performance problems on ethernet networks when the e0m management interface i...
 
NetApp system installation workbook Spokane
NetApp system installation workbook SpokaneNetApp system installation workbook Spokane
NetApp system installation workbook Spokane
 
Migrate volume in akfiler7
Migrate volume in akfiler7Migrate volume in akfiler7
Migrate volume in akfiler7
 
Migrate vol in akfiler7
Migrate vol in akfiler7Migrate vol in akfiler7
Migrate vol in akfiler7
 
Data storage requirements AK
Data storage requirements AKData storage requirements AK
Data storage requirements AK
 
C mode class
C mode classC mode class
C mode class
 
Akfiler upgrades providence july 2012
Akfiler upgrades providence july 2012Akfiler upgrades providence july 2012
Akfiler upgrades providence july 2012
 
NA notes
NA notesNA notes
NA notes
 
Reporting demo
Reporting demoReporting demo
Reporting demo
 
Net app virtualization preso
Net app virtualization presoNet app virtualization preso
Net app virtualization preso
 
Providence net app upgrade plan PPMC
Providence net app upgrade plan PPMCProvidence net app upgrade plan PPMC
Providence net app upgrade plan PPMC
 
WSC Net App storage for windows challenges and solutions
WSC Net App storage for windows challenges and solutionsWSC Net App storage for windows challenges and solutions
WSC Net App storage for windows challenges and solutions
 
50,000-seat_VMware_view_deployment
50,000-seat_VMware_view_deployment50,000-seat_VMware_view_deployment
50,000-seat_VMware_view_deployment
 
Tr 3998 -deployment_guide_for_hosted_shared_desktops_and_on-demand_applicatio...
Tr 3998 -deployment_guide_for_hosted_shared_desktops_and_on-demand_applicatio...Tr 3998 -deployment_guide_for_hosted_shared_desktops_and_on-demand_applicatio...
Tr 3998 -deployment_guide_for_hosted_shared_desktops_and_on-demand_applicatio...
 
Tr 3749 -net_app_storage_best_practices_for_v_mware_vsphere,_dec_11
Tr 3749 -net_app_storage_best_practices_for_v_mware_vsphere,_dec_11Tr 3749 -net_app_storage_best_practices_for_v_mware_vsphere,_dec_11
Tr 3749 -net_app_storage_best_practices_for_v_mware_vsphere,_dec_11
 
Snap mirror source to tape to destination scenario
Snap mirror source to tape to destination scenarioSnap mirror source to tape to destination scenario
Snap mirror source to tape to destination scenario
 

Data Storage in the Cloud - Can You Afford Not To

  • 1. WHITE PAPER Data Storage in the Cloud – Can you Afford Not To?
  • 2. Data Storage in the Cloud – Can You Afford Not To? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Storing data in the cloud using a Whitewater™ cloud storage gateway from Riverbed Technology overcomes what is becoming a serious challenge for IT departments: how to manage the vast, and ever-growing, amount of data that must be protected. Whitewater eliminates concerns about data security, data transmission speeds over the Internet, and data availability, while providing great flexibility and a favorable return on investment. Moving data to the cloud replaces the high costs of tape and disk storage systems with a pay-as-you-go cloud storage tier. This paper makes the business case for cloud storage, outlining where capital and operational costs can be eliminated or avoided by using the cloud for backup and archive storage. Cloud storage offers advantages Cloud computing has a wide variety of definitions today. Simply put, in this paper, cloud computing refers to accessing servers or storage over the Internet for the purposes of running applications or storing data. This analysis looks at the viability of using the cloud for data storage, specifically pay-as-you-go data storage services from providers such as Amazon, AT&T, Nirvanix and EMC Atmos, including use for backup, recovery, replication and disaster recovery (DR) operations. (Some would call this as a “public” cloud since these providers open their services to all.) As a new delivery model for IT services, cloud computing is still being evaluated by most CIOs. Its primary advantage is the ability to increase IT capacity without investments in new infrastructure, personnel and software licenses. Common concerns include the fact that proprietary, critical data leaves the premises. This is addressed in Cloud storage concerns, and how they can be addressed, below. For data storage, cloud computing offers a safe, attractive and affordable solution to what is becoming a serious challenge for IT departments: how to manage the vast and ever-growing amount of data that must be backed up and maintained. Even organizations with an effective data storage process currently in place may find these processes overwhelmed by data volumes in the future. Riverbed customers report that their data increases by 40 to 60 percent annually, putting their storage systems on the fast track to full capacity and obsolescence. According to Riverbed customers, some of the advantages gained by using cloud storage include:  Pay-as-you go capacity costs  Data accessibility from anywhere  Automatic off-site copy of data for DR  Unprecedented flexibility and scalability  Low cost due to economies of scale of cloud storage providers  High availability due to the redundancy built into cloud storage Cloud storage concerns, and how they can be addressed Four key concerns dominate views today on storing an organization’s data in the public cloud. Of these, security is the greatest. Data must be safe during transmission to and from the cloud, as well as while it resides within the cloud. Slow data transmission speeds across the WAN are another concern. Moving terabytes of raw data to and from the cloud can be very time consuming, making it a significant problem. Third, data must be available when needed. Data inaccessibility can have a very significant business impact. Finally, the concern around the return on investment (ROI) that will be gained by use of cloud storage which is especially acute during times of shrinking IT budgets. Riverbed recently introduced cloud storage gateway technology that addresses each of these cloud storage concerns, making the public cloud a feasible storage tier for most organizations. Riverbed® Whitewater® cloud storage gateways, available in both hardware and virtual configurations, require no change to a company’s existing backup infrastructure. On the front-end, Whitewater appliances present themselves as CIFS shares or NFS mounts to the existing backup software and appears as a standard disk target to the backup software. At the back-end, they have built-in support for APIs from Amazon Web Services S3, AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service Microsoft Windows Azure, Nirvanix Cloud Storage Network, Rackspace Cloud Files, clouds based on EMC Atmos or OpenStack (Swift) object storage. These compatibilities allow Whitewater to be immediately deployed in most IT environments. © 2011 Riverbed Technology. All rights reserved. 1
  • 3. Data Storage in the Cloud – Can You Afford Not To? Whitewater cloud storage gateways address public cloud storage concerns in the following ways: Data security. Whitewater cloud storage gateways encrypt data in-flight to the cloud with SSL v3 and at rest using 256-bit AES encryption. This dual-level encryption ensures that any data moved into cloud storage will not be compromised and creates end- to-end security. Whitewater gateways leverage an innovative key management system that allows organizations to carefully manage data security. Encryption keys are kept safe by IT management. Transmission speed across the WAN. Whitewater cloud storage gateways leverage existing Riverbed data acceleration technology, including the industry-proven WAN optimization and deduplication functionality in the Steelhead® product line, to speed the transfer of data to and from the cloud. Whitewater appliances receive data from the backup application, deduplicate it, compress and encrypt it, store it in a local disk cache, translate it to cloud protocols, and then send to the cloud, minimizing transmission time to and from the cloud. The deduplication technology (inline, variable-length, byte-level) reduces the amount of data sent to the cloud by 10 to 30 times, on average. In addition, because cloud storage providers charge based on the amount of storage capacity, deduplication reduces the cost of using it as a storage tier. Data availability. Because Whitewater cloud storage gateways are often implemented as part of a DR solution, it is critical that companies can access data as quickly as possible, wherever it resides. Whitewater gateways use a local disk cache to store the most recent backups. Because most restores are from recent backups, typical data retrieval is from the local cache. In the uncommon case where the backup data needed is no longer within the local cache, the Whitewater appliance will supplement whatever data is no longer in the cache by pulling the required data from the cloud. The Whitewater appliance minimizes the amount of cloud-based data needed in order to satisfy this type of restore. The business case for cloud storage Compared to tape or disk backup, storing data in the public cloud has been shown to reduce costs and backup time in a number of ways. Listed below are some examples, along with estimates of avoided costs gathered from Whitewater users: Tape backup (assuming LTO-4 tape with 120 MB/sec throughput and 800 GB capacity)  LTO-4 drives ($10,000/drive)  LTO-4 tape library ($30,000 each)  LTO-4 tape ($30/tape)  Tape maintenance (18% to 23% of total cost of tape system)  Off-site tape vaulting ($200 - $500 per /month)  Power and cooling costs Disk backup  Storage array ($5,000 to $150,000, often $1,000 per TB for enterprise class storage)  Storage array maintenance (9% to18% of the price of the array)  Power and cooling costs The “set and forget” nature of the Whitewater cloud storage gateways compares favorably to the on-going labor involved with tape and disk storage. If labor cost is estimated at $80,000 per man-year, and with the assumption of one person needed for every 50 terabytes of stored data, labor cost savings from using Whitewater from labor alone can be substantial. Other advantages can be harder to quantify, but still increase the ROI from using Whitewater cloud storage gateways. Because backups are faster than tape due to the data being written to an appliance (rather than a tape drive), more frequent backups are possible, making the recovery point closer to the current time. Another advantage is that writing data to the Whitewater gateway generally improves the number of successful backup jobs by 5 to 10 percent by eliminating a number of tape-related issues that often cause backups to fail, saving labor and minimizing risk for the organization by reducing the amount of time a server is unprotected. © 2011 Riverbed Technology. All rights reserved. 2
  • 4. Data Storage in the Cloud – Can You Afford Not To? Another area where Whitewater has the potential for significant cost savings is legal compliance. Audits and legal action typically put a hold on all data, which means that companies using tape backup can no longer reuse these tapes. It is not unheard of that data can be on legal hold for several years, possibly representing tens of thousands of dollars worth of tape. During a legal action, using a Whitewater gateway and storing the data in the cloud replaces the enormous cost of tape infrastructure and vaulting with the per-use fee of the cloud storage provider. For companies currently using disk backup, switching to Whitewater allows them to reclaim disk-based storage for other uses and avoid buying disk to forward provision in anticipation of future needs. As part of a DR strategy, companies will often use a replication application to replicate their data to a second site and also back up to tape to provide recovery in the event that the replicated data is erased through human or software errors. With a Whitewater gateway writing data to the cloud, the tape system is unnecessary; the cloud is the replication backup. Results from Riverbed customers International Justice Mission International Justice Mission is a human rights agency that secures justice for victims of slavery, sexual exploitation and other forms of violent oppression. The agency’s mission encompasses victim relief, perpetrator accountability, victim aftercare, and structural transformation. IJM upgraded from a tape backup system to a Whitewater cloud storage gateway “Whitewater lets us do backups and restores as part of the agency’s transfer of critical systems from its Washington D.C. without anyone on site,” McPeek says. “And it headquarters to a lights-out data center. “One of the holdups was that we needed saves us from having to hire a backup a backup system that we could manage without having someone physically engineer to manage the system.” present, or having to hire additional staff,” explains Chris McPeek, manager of global systems and infrastructure at IJM. After getting Whitewater up and running – “one of the easiest installs ever,” according to McPeek – IJM was able to eliminate all of the labor associated with the previous tape backup system, such as rotating the tapes in the catalog and moving them off-site. “Whitewater lets us do backups and restores without anyone on site,” McPeek says. “And it saves us from having to hire a backup engineer to manage the system.” Costs avoided: salary for an entry-level engineer and tape transport and vaulting. Another significant cost savings involves the agency’s 15 field offices. Prior to deploying the Whitewater gateway, McPeek was planning to acquire tape backup systems or network attached storage (NAS) devices for each of those sites. Instead, a backup server running Symantec Backup Exec pulls data in from all of the field offices and writes it to the Whitewater gateway, which then sends it to the cloud. “Essentially we just point our backups at the Whitewater appliance and let it rip, and off it goes out into the Internet,” he adds. Costs avoided: backup systems for 15 offices. IJM’s data consists, in part, of crucial information related to the prosecutions of perpetrators. It must be retained for as long as necessary until the cases go to trial. The volume of data at IJM grows by about 40 to 60 percent per year. Currently the amount of data being backed up runs about 4.5 terabytes. It would not have taken too long before the previous tape backup system was overwhelmed. By going with Whitewater, which scales up easily, the company will avoid large capital expenses related to addition tape backup equipment. Costs avoided: tape system upgrade. For IJM, whose mission is saving lives, all these avoided costs represent more than a healthier balance sheet. Says McPeek, “We can almost measure per person how many lives are saved because of having Riverbed technology such as Whitewater in our network.” Mid-size Company The systems administrator at this company was just about to request approval of a 4x increase in physical data storage capacity when he learned about Whitewater. The company was using a tape backup system at the time, and the growing amount of data being backed up was going to exceed the system’s limit. Increasing the capacity was going to cost several hundred thousand dollars. That would be added to the acquisition and on-going costs of the tape system which, for this company, included: 48 tapes/week at a cost of $30 each, the 10-drive tape library ($100,000 for the ten drives and $30,000 to $40,000 for the library), off-site tape © 2011 Riverbed Technology. All rights reserved. 3
  • 5. Data Storage in the Cloud – Can You Afford Not To? storage (hundreds of dollars per month), and approximately one-half of one full-time employee’s salary to manage the process. Other costs included the off-site provider’s fee to deliver a tape for a restore ($400 to $1,000, depending on how quickly the company needed the tape) and new tape drives for those that needed to be replaced ($10,000/drive/every few years) due to constant use. Choosing to deploy Whitewater and cloud Choosing to deploy Whitewater and cloud storage instead of upgrading the tape storage instead of upgrading the tape system system was “a real game changer for us,” says the systems administrator. It took was “a real game changer for us,” says the him less than half an hour to set up the Whitewater appliance which, unlike the systems administrator. It took him less than tape system, requires no on-going labor to manage. The deduplication half an hour to set up the Whitewater performed by the Whitewater appliance greatly reduces the amount of data that appliance which, unlike the tape system, goes into cloud storage. The systems administrator reports an initial requires no on-going labor to manage. The deduplication factor of approximately five, meaning that of the 150 terabytes of deduplication performed by the Whitewater data backed up at that time, his company only paid to store about 30 terabytes in appliance greatly reduces the amount of data the cloud. They expect their deduplication rate should keep improving as the that goes into cloud storage. Whitewater appliance sees the same data over and over, so that 30 terabytes should grow very slowly over time. Pump Solutions Group Pump Solutions Group (PSG) is a global manufacturer of pumps with facilities in the U.S., Germany, China, India, and France. When PSG needed to unify the disparate networks of its subsidiaries and build a common DR framework for the organization, the company became an early adopter of a Whitewater, which the company deployed originally in its Wilden Pump subsidiary based in California. Before Whitewater was installed, the backup process at Wilden Pump began with disk-to-disk replication using either Dell EqualLogic or an HP SAN for disk storage. Data from the disk was then copied to tape. Jeff Rountree, global network manager at PSG, estimates the costs of the tape backup system at approximately $30,000 for the initial investment (tape libraries and tape media) and $5,600 in annual maintenance and upkeep. Part of the annual maintenance and upkeep included approximately two hours per week of someone’s time for managing the tapes. Those two hours a week have been freed up for higher value work. Cost savings: $5600 per year plus 100 hours annually. Rountree has found other areas where the Whitewater appliance saves money. One is in the amount the company pays to its cloud storage provider, AT&T, each month. Because Whitewater deduplicates and compresses the backup data before sending it to AT&T, the cost of cloud storage is much less than it would otherwise be. Explains Rountree: “The amount of data we back up is around 1.2 terabytes, but what we put out to cloud ends up being only 100 gigabytes.” At the rate they are paying for cloud storage (25 cents/gigabyte) that represents a savings of $275/month. Annual savings: $3,300. Another savings relates to the company’s SANs. Using SANs for long-term storage “I can do the same number now and do is expensive, and now that Wilden Pump is storing data in the cloud, the company them faster, and we are thinking about does not need to purchase additional SANs. “EqualLogic is fairly inefficient when doing full backups more frequently. With doing replication,” Rountree says. “Space is reserved on the target EqualLogic for Whitewater, more backup work gets the source volume on the source EqualLogic, so even if there is only 80 gigabytes, done in less time.” for example, used on a 500-gigabyte source volume, 500 gigabytes are reserved on the target EqualLogic that cannot be used.” In an example he related, 97 percent of delegated replication space on the SAN was empty but could not be used for anything else. “Considering an EqualLogic would cost $30,000 to $75,000 or more, purchasing a SAN for long-term storage is a significant investment, and it does not protect data as well as Whitewater does with off-site replication,” he adds. Costs avoided: $30,000 to $75,000. With Whitewater appliances, backups run faster, so full backups can be done more frequently. And it is now possible to perform multiple backups simultaneously. Rountree is evaluating how the company’s backup practices will change now that they have Whitewater. “We used to limit how many backups we did at one time,” he says. “I can do the same number now and do them faster, and we are thinking about doing full backups more frequently. With Whitewater, more backup work gets done in less time.” For Rountree, who knows that the ultimate purpose of backed-up data is to be able to restore it when necessary, Whitewater gives the company better protection for its data. “A huge advantage of Whitewater is how quickly we can restore data now,” he says. “With tape, you can lose part of a week’s data depending on when you last backed up, which means you would lose the most © 2011 Riverbed Technology. All rights reserved. 4
  • 6. Data Storage in the Cloud – Can You Afford Not To? recent information. With Whitewater, a full restore can be done within an hour or two, and can be done from any location”. (Value: the cost of lost data.) Whitewater Cloud Storage Gateway Overview Riverbed Whitewater cloud storage gateways allow organizations to eliminate tape, reduce costs, streamline administration and improve disaster recovery readiness by leveraging the scalability, flexibility and pay-for-use pricing of cloud storage. Disaster recovery capability is greatly improved by secure off-site storage within the public cloud without the expense of redundant hardware, power, cooling and hosting costs. Backup data stored in the cloud is available anywhere with an internet connection to provide fast, flexible recovery should the unexpected occur. Whitewater safeguards data during transmission and at rest using secure socket layer V3 (SSLv3) technology and strong AES 256 bit encryption. This dual layer of security ensures that sensitive data is protected end-to-end. Leveraging Riverbed’s industry leading deduplication, compression and optimization technologies, Whitewater gateways shrink data set sizes by 10 to 30x on average, substantially reducing cloud storage costs while accelerating data transfers. This massive reduction in data sets allows a single gateway to replace more than a petabyte of data stored on tape. Whitewater gateways secure, optimize and accelerate backup and recovery to the cloud without changes to the existing infrastructure. Whitewater acts as a broker to connect any of the following data protection applications to the following cloud storage providers: Data Protection Applications Cloud Storage Providers CA ARCserve, Commvault Simpana, EMC Networker, HP Amazon Web Services S3, AT&T Synaptic Storage as a DataProtector, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager, Quest vRanger, Service, Microsoft Windows Azure, Nirvanix Cloud Storage Symantec NetBackup and Backup Exec, Veeam Backup and Network, Rackspace Cloud Files, clouds based on EMC Replication Atmos or OpenStack (Swift) object storage. Conclusion The public cloud can offer a safe, attractive and affordable solution for the storage of backup data sets. Concerns around security, transmission speed, and accessibility exist but each can be overcome by the application of technologies that exist today from industry leading vendors such as Riverbed. From interviews with Riverbed Whitewater cloud storage gateway users, key benefits such as reduced system management requirements, avoidance of new tape and storage array purchases and the ability to safely store data off site provide a substantial return on investment. Cost savings continue to accrue by large reductions in data set size by use of deduplication and the resulting reduction in cloud storage costs. Customers leveraging Whitewater gateways are pleased that they have moved their backup data sets from tape technologies to the public cloud, for from their experience, they can no longer afford not to. About Riverbed Riverbed delivers performance for the globally connected enterprise. With Riverbed, enterprises can successfully and intelligently implement strategic initiatives such as virtualization, consolidation, cloud computing, and disaster recovery without fear of compromising performance. By giving enterprises the platform they need to understand, optimize and consolidate their IT, Riverbed helps enterprises to build a fast, fluid and dynamic IT architecture that aligns with the business needs of the organization. Additional information about Riverbed (NASDAQ: RVBD) is available at www.riverbed.com. Riverbed Technology, Inc. Riverbed Technology Ltd. Riverbed Technology Pte. Ltd. Riverbed Technology K.K. 199 Fremont Street One Thames Valley 391A Orchard Road #22-06/10 Shiba-Koen Plaza Building 9F San Francisco, CA 94105 Wokingham Road, Level 2 Ngee Ann City Tower A 3-6-9, Shiba, Minato-ku Tel: (415) 247-8800 Bracknell. RG42 1NG Singapore 238873 Tokyo, Japan 105-0014 www.riverbed.com United Kingdom Tel: +65 6508-7400 Tel: +81 3 5419 1990 Tel: +44 1344 401900 © 2011 Riverbed Technology. All rights reserved. 5