Semelhante a 5A_ 2_Developing a statistical methodology to improve classification and mapping of seabed type from deep water multi-beam echo sounder data
Semelhante a 5A_ 2_Developing a statistical methodology to improve classification and mapping of seabed type from deep water multi-beam echo sounder data (20)
8B_2_Using sound to represent uncertainty in address locations
5A_ 2_Developing a statistical methodology to improve classification and mapping of seabed type from deep water multi-beam echo sounder data
1. Developing a statistical methodology to improve classification and mapping of seabed type from deep water Multi-Beam Echo Sounder (MBES) data Helen Caughey, Kazi Ishtiak Ahmed, Paul Harris, Peter Hung, Urška Demšar, Sean McLoone, A Stewart Fotheringham, Xavier Monteys, Ronan O’Toole Presented by: Helen Caughey National Centre for Geocomputation National University of Ireland, Maynooth helen.m.caughey @ nuim.ie GISRUK 2010, University College London, 15th April 2010
2.
3.
4.
5. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible? Removal of pulse length 2000 from analysis
6. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible?
7. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible? Identification of spatially overlapping data subsets Removal of pulse length 2000 from analysis 6 overlapping, spatially diverse, areas identified from PL 5000 & 15000 (each overlap also has multiple sub areas)
8. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible?
9. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible? Identification of spatially overlapping data subsets Removal of pulse length 2000 from analysis 6 overlapping, spatially diverse, areas identified from PL 5000 & 15000 (each overlap also has multiple sub areas) “ Pseudo Pairwise” overlapping data subsets were then identified and refined automatically in the R statistical computing environment
10. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible?
11. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible? Summary Statistics and distributions
12. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible?
13. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible? Summary Statistics and distributions Classical hypothesis testing (F, t and K-S tests) Differences in Spatial Autocorrelation; investigated using estimated variograms ( M ethods o f M oments Variograms) and modelled variograms ( Re stricted M aximum L ikelihood Variograms) Correlation and error analyses; Scatterplots & weighted error diagnostics, Weighted correlations, Robust & weighted correlations
14. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible?
15. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible?
16. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible?
17. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible?
18.
19. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible? Focused scale investigations
20. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible?
21. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible?
22. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible?
23. Phase 1: Data integration based on spatial and statistical analysis; Is data integration possible?