Fukushima pranesimas

Fukušima, melas, valdţia ir referendumas
Saulius Lapienis
2012 lapkričio 13 d., Vilnius, Venclovų namai-muziejus

Statybų pradţia:
1967 liepos 25 d.
Veiklos pradţia:
1971 kovo 26 d.

Veiklos pabaiga:
2012 balandžio 20 d.

Fukušima

Dizaineris: Uţsakovas:

Reaktoriai:

GE pastatų architektas:
Ebasco

Statytojas:
Kajima

The reactors for Units 1, 2, and 6 were supplied by General Electric,
those for Units 3 and 5 by Toshiba, and Unit 4 byHitachi.

All six reactors were designed by General Electric.[5][6]

Architectural design for General Electric's units was done by Ebasco.

All construction was done by Kajima.[7]

Since September 2010, Unit 3 has been fueled by a small fraction 6%)
[8] of plutonium containing mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel, rather than the low

enriched uranium (LEU) used in the other reactors.[9][10]

Units 1–5 were built with Mark I type (light bulb torus)containment
structures.[11][12]

The Mark I containment structure was slightly increased in volume by
Japanese engineers.[13]

Fukushima Dai-ichi
(dai-ichi reiškia "numeris vienas")

2010 rugsėjis
6% Pu; MOX

1-5 reaktorių tipas – BWR MARK 1
6 reaktoriaus – BWR MARK 2

Pirmoji klaida:
statybų pradţia

Statant Fukušima-1 atominę elektrinę buvęs
35 m aukščio status vandenyno krantas buvo
“pažemintas” beveik 25 metrais.

One reason the bluff was lowered was so that the base of
the reactors could be constructed on solid bedrock to mitigate
the threat posed by earthquakes.

Another reason was the lowered height would keep the
running costs of the seawater pumps low.

TEPCO's analysis of the tsunami risk when planning the
site's construction determined that the lower elevation was safe
because the sea wall would provide adequate protection for the
maximum tsunami assumed by the design basis.

However, the lower site elevation did increase the
vulnerability for a tsunami larger than anticipated in design.

Avarija:
2011 kovo
11,12,14,15 d.

1) Unit 1: Explosion, roof blown off (12 March)
2) Unit 2: Explosion (15 March), Contaminated water in
underground trench, possible leak from suppression chamber
3) Unit 3: Explosion, most of concrete building destroyed (14
March), Possible plutonium leak
4) Unit 4: Fire (15 March), Water level in spent fuel pools partly
restored

5) Multiple trenches: probable source of contaminated water,
partly underground, leaked stopped (6 April)

2011-03-12

2011-03-15

2011-03-15 2011-03-14

2011 balandžio 6 d.

Type: BWR-3
Containment: Mark I
Construction: July 25, 1967
Criticality: October 10, 1970
Commercial Operation: March 26, 1971
Electric Power: 460 MW
Reactor Supplier: General Electric
Architecture: Ebasco
Construction: Kajima
Fuel: LEU
INES Disaster rating: 7

The first of the Fukushima Daiichi reactors to be built, unit one lost
power at 3:41pm JST in March 11 after the earthquake and suffered a
hydrogen at 3:36pm JST March 12th.

The isolation condenser valve was closed in the initial response to the
earthquake, technicians were unable to reopen it after power was
lost.

The building‘s older design featured a sheet metal upper level that blew
out during the explosion leaving the building‘s roof laying on the
refueling floor.

It is now estimated that the reactor core melted to the bottom of
the reactor vessel within 16 hours of the station black out (power loss).

The melted core is also likely melted through the vessel and is
somewhere within the containment structure.

Tepco started to inject seawater into the No. 1 reactor at 8:20 p.m.
March 12, but at 7:04 p.m. JST that day, stopped it at 7:25 p.m. JST
and resumed it at 8:20 p.m. JST

Reactor 1 had the shroud replaced in 2008

Type: BWR-4
Containment: Mark I
Construction: June 9, 1969
Criticality: May 10, 1973
Commercial Operation: July 18, 1974
Fuel: LEU
INES Disaster Rating: 7

The second of the Fukushima Daiichi reactors to be built, unit two lost
emergency cooling function of the ECCS at 4:36pm on March 11 after the
earthquake.
The pressure control function was lost at 5:32am JST on March 12th.
The reactor water level was found to be low at 1:24pm JST leading to the
conclusion that reactor cooling function had been lost.
On the morning of March 13 an attempt was made to manually open the
venting valve.
At Midnight March 14th, another attempt to open the venting valve was
tried. Sea water was injected into unit 2 in an attempt to establish cooling
functions at 4:34pm JST on March 14th.
It suffered a hydrogen explosion at 6:20am JST March 15th.
The hydrogen explosion blew holes in the suppression chamber. After this
incident radiation levels at the main gate spiked to doses reaching 11,930
microsieverts per hour from 73 microsieverts 3 hours earlier. The damage
led to leakage of the contaminated water into the rest of the building, then
into the ocean.
It is now estimated that the reactor core melted to the bottom of the
reactor vessel within 16 hours of the station black out (power loss). The
melted core is also likely melted through the vessel and is somewhere
within the containment structure. It is also likely that the lower
suppression chamber is damaged and causing radioactive water to leak out
of the containment.
Reactor 2 had the shroud replaced in 2001

Type: BWR-4
Containment: Mark I
Construction: December 28, 1970
Criticality: September 6, 1974
Commercial Operation: March 27, 1976
Reactor Supplier: Toshiba
Architecture: Toshiba
Fuel: LEU/MOX

The third of the Fukushima Daiichi reactors to be built, reactor 3 had the shroud
replaced in 1999. At the same time Fukushima Daiichi received it’s first shipment of
MOX (plutonium-uranium) fuel. Various issues and the rescinding of local government
approval to run MOX in unit 3 delayed the installation of MOX fuel until September of
2010. At the time of the earthquake unit 3 had a mixed load of MOX and LEU in the
reactor. It is unclear how many total MOX shipments were received at Daiichi and how
many total assemblies are stored or in use at the power plant. Records show unit 3 to be
the only one running MOX but MOX fuel must be stored in a spent fuel pool even if it is
unused due to volatility. Unit 3 lost all AC power at 3:42pm JST on March 11th. Loss of
the emergency core cooling function of the ECCS was reported to authorities at 5:58am
JST on March 13th. At 9:20am JST on March 13th the pressure relief valve for the
reactor was opened. At 1:12pm JST on March 13th sea water was injected into the
reactor. Pressure in the reactor reached 460 kPa beyond the design value at 6:10am
JST March 14th. Unit 3 suffered an intense hydrogen explosion at 11:01am on March
14th. At 8:32am JST an enormous amount of white smoke belched from unit 3. Self
Defense Forces attempted to drop water by helicopter at 4pm JST on March 16th but
was abandoned due to high radiation levels. At 9:48am JST Self Defense Forces
resumed helicopter water drops.
It is now estimated that the reactor core melted to the bottom of the reactor vessel within
16 hours of the station black out (power loss).
The melted core is also likely melted through the vessel and is somewhere within
the containment structure.

Type: BWR-4
Containment: Mark I
Construction: February 12, 1973
Criticality: January 28, 1978
Commercial Operation: Oct. 12, 1978
Reactor Supplier: Hitachi
Architecture: Hitachi
Fuel: LEU

The fourth of the Fukushima Daiichi reactors to be built. At the time of the earthquake
unit 4 was shut down for extensive maintenance. The rod assemblies were removed
from the core and stored in the spent fuel pool. Some of the extensive work to be done
was the replacement of the reactor vessel shroud. Unit 4 lost AC power along with the
other units at the plant. At 4:08am JST on March 14th, the spent fuel pool at unit 4 was
84 degrees celsius. At 6:20am JST on March 15th a part of a wall in the operation area
of Unit 4 of Fukushima Daiichi was damaged. TEPCO provided no further details on this
damage. At 9:38am JST on March 15th a fire broke out in the reactor building of unit
4, the fire was reported extinguished by 12:29pm JST. TEPCO has changed their story
on unit 4 multiple times but eventually admitted to a very obvious explosion occurring at
unit 4. No video of unit 4 exploding exists to date and it is assumed the explosion
took place before dawn. One of TEPCO’s later admissions regarding unit 4 is that they
think hydrogen leaked into unit 4 from unit 3 via the venting pipes and a faulty valve. No
reason was given as to why unit 4 did not then ignite when unit 3 exploded.
The blast at unit 4 did extensive damage to the structural integrity of the building.
TEPCO has admitted the blast ignited within both the lower floors and upper floors of the
building. A concrete entrance garage can be seen to have the wall panels blown out. An
inner staircase was identified as destroyed by TEPCO. There is extensive obvious
structural damage. The spent fuel pool has been identified as leaking and unstable.
Work cranes have been seen working around the building.

The IAEA reported that on May 9th work began to structurally support the floor of the
spent fuel pool at unit 4.

Type: BWR-4
Containment: Mark I
Construction: May 22, 1972
Criticality: August 26, 1977
Commercial Operation: April 18, 1978
Reactor Supplier: Toshiba
Architecture: Toshiba
Fuel: LEU

The fifth of the Fukushima Daiichi reactors to be built.
Unit 5 was in cold shutdown when the earthquake hit.
No known major damage occurred at unit 5 and it managed to
maintain a somewhat safe status until AC power could be restored.
Unit 5 has a slightly different construction than units 1-4 including
outside vertical structural beams that can be seen in the image.
Reactor 5 had the shroud replaced in 2000.

Type: BWR-5
Containment: Mark II
Construction: October 26, 1973
Criticality: March 9, 1979
Commercial Operation: October 24, 1979
Electric Power: 1,100 MW
Fuel: LEU

The sixth of the Fukushima Daiichi reactors to be built. Unit 6 is the only
Mark II unit at the plant and has a different outer containment system
than other units at Fukushima. This unit was also in cold shutdown mode
during the earthquake.
It has no known major damage but has had issues with
contaminated groundwater in the turbine building. This water
infiltration could risk the cooling system function if it should reach the
reactor building. Two meters of water was discovered in the turbine
building in mid-May.
Unit 6 has not had the shroud replaced to our knowledge.

World Nuclear News, here.
It reports:
Japanese authorities notified the International Atomic Energy Agency of
their decision to up the rating:
―As a result of re-evaluation, total amount of discharged iodine-131 is
estimated at 1.3 1017 becquerels, and caesium-137 is estimated at
6.1 1015 becquerels.

Hence the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency has concluded that
the rating of the accident would be equivalent of Level 7.‖

The INES (International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES)

What the INES-7 Rating at Fukushima Means

What are some of the similarities and differences between
Fukushima and Chernobyl?
Both have involved breeches of radiological barriers and controls,
overwhelming of defence-in-depth measures, and large-scale release of
radioactive isotopes into the environment. The causes and sequence of
the two events were, however, very different, in terms of reactor
designs, the nature of the triggering events, and time-scale for
resolution — this is a topic to be explored in more depth in some future
post.
The obviously big contrast is in the human toll and nature of the
radioactive release.

Barry Brook, Adelaidės
universitetas, Australija

Key points in nuclear disaster report

5 July 2012

A Japanese parliamentary panel has delivered a damning verdict after
investigating the accident at the Fukushima nuclear plant which followed an
earthquake and tsunami on 11 March 2011.

Disaster 'manmade' - chairman's message Chairman Kiyoshi Kurokawa
Collusion and lack of governance
Organisational problems within Tepco
Emergency response issues
Evacuation issues
Continuing public health and welfare issues
Regulator failures
Operator failures
Shortcomings in laws and regulations
No 'cosmetic solutions'

Japonijos parlamento komiteto
REKOMENDACIJOS
 Permanent committee in National Diet [parliament] to oversee the
regulators, with regular investigations and hearings
 Reform of the crisis management system, making boundaries
between responsibilities of local and national governments and the operators
clear, and establishing clear chain of command in emergency situations
 Establishment of system to deal with long-term public health effects,
including monitoring and decontaminating radiation-affected areas
 Dramatic corporate reform of Tepco and new relationships established
among the electric power companies built on safety issues, mutual
supervision and transparency
 New regulatory body established on independence, transparency,
professionalism, and consolidation of functions
 Reform of laws related to nuclear energy to meet global standards of
safety, public health and welfare
 Develop a system of independent investigation commissions

Japonijos parlamento komiteto išvados
(Lietuvoje paskelbta tik ne centrinėje spaudoje)

„nors nelaimė prasidėjo dėl gamtos stichijos, tačiau vėlesni incidentai
Fukušimos branduolinėje jėgainėje turi būti laikomi kaip žmonių
sukelti―.

Priduriama, kad „katastrofos padarinius efektyvesnis žmonių darbas
taip pat galėjo sušvelninti―.

Komisijos išvadose negailima kritikos tiek valstybės, tiek jėgainės
valdytojos „Tepco― padarinių likvidavimo darbų kokybei.

Išvadose taip pat pastebima, kad Japonijos kultūrinės tradicijos ir
nenoras prieštarauti autoritetui neigiamai prisidėjo prie
efektyvaus Fukušimos krizės sprendimo.

Skaitykite daugiau:
http://www.15min.lt/naujiena/aktualu/pasaulis/japonija-fukusimos-katastrofa-ivyko-del-zmogaus-
kaltes-57-231688#ixzz2Btmq4GsI

Japonijos parlamento komiteto išvados
(rusiška apţvalga)

Авария на АЭС "Фукусима-1" вызвала резко отрицательное
отношение к ядерной энергии в японском обществе.

Парламентский комитет в Японии по итогам расследования
заявил, что причиной аварии на АЭС "Фукусима-1" в марте
прошлого года были действия человека.

Авторы доклада заявляют, что аварию можно было спрогнозировать
и сделать все возможное для того, чтобы избежать катастрофического
развития событий.

"Авария на "Фукусиме-1" была не природной, а техногенной
катастрофой.

Атомная станция не была готова ни к удару сильного землетрясения, ни
к цунами", - говорится в докладе.

В докладе помимо прочего упоминается, что еще одной из причин
аварии были особенности японской культуры, в которой не
принято возражать вышестоящим.

Reaktorių
konstrukcija:
klaidos

BWR MARK 1 tipo reaktoriaus
konteinerio skerspjūvis: Advanced Boiling
DW = sausa erdvė, WW = drėgna Water Reactor (ABWR)
erdvė, SF = panaudoto kuro saugykla technology

Kas yra
atominė
energetika?

Nuclear Energy Information Service

"Atoms For Peace"
For as long as there has been federal control of nuclear research and
materials, there has been an interest in using commercial nuclear
reactors as a source of materials to make weapons.

In the early 1950's it was recognized that the weapons program would
require more plutonium than could be furnished by the Atomic
Energy Commission (AEC).

One suggestion, made by Dr. Charles A. Thomas, then executive vice-
president of Monsanto Chemical Company, was to create a dual
purpose plutonium reactor, on which could produce plutonium for
weapons, and electricity for commercial use.

http://www.neis.org/literature/Brochures/weapcon.htm

In a document from the Los Alamos National
Laboratory dated August, 1981, one finds this
statement:

"There is no technical demarcation between the
military and civilian reactor and there never was
one.

What has persisted over the decades is just the
misconception that such a linkage does not
exist.―
("Some Political Issues Related to Future Special Nuclear Fuels Production," LA- 8969-MS, UC-16).

TEN FACTS ABOUT NUCLEAR WEAPONS
1. There are still some 26,000 nuclear warheads in the world, enough to destroy
civilization many times over and destroy most life on earth. Nuclear weapons make
humans an endangered species.
2. More than 95% of all nuclear weapons are in the arsenals of the US and Russia.
3. The average nuclear weapon in the US arsenal is approximately eight times more
powerful than the nuclear bomb that destroyed Hiroshima, immediately killing some
90,000 people.
4. There are currently nine countries with nuclear weapons (US, Russia, UK, France,
China, Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea).
7. There are up to 2,000,000 kilograms of Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) in global
stockpiles, and it takes just 15-24 kilograms for a nuclear weapon. There are
28 countries with at least one bomb‘s worth of HEU and 12 countries with at least 20
bombs‘ worth.
8. Plutonium created in nuclear power reactors is another source of bomb material.
It takes as little as three to five kilograms of plutonium to create a nuclear
weapon.
There are now some 500,000 kilograms of separated plutonium in global
stockpiles. Plutonium stocks continue to increase due to civilian ‗spent‘ fuel
reprocessing.

https://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2009/09/facts_myths.pdf

Americans cannot afford from a security standpoint to have
Japan abandon nuclear power. It‘s too important to us.
John Hamre, president and CEO of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington

•―Nuclear power from the very beginning was (not only) a source of promise, but
(also) a source of great threat because nuclear power electric generation is
also the base for making nuclear weapons, and it‘s a great risk to the world to
have commercial nuclear power plants because there is a possibility of diverting the
material and turning it into weapons.‖
•―The countries that have given us the security system are going to diminish, and
who‘s going to replace them?‖
•―Americans cannot afford from a security standpoint to have Japan abandon
nuclear power. It‘s too important to us.‖
•―Citizens right now do not believe the government can protect them and they
don‟t have any confidence the government can provide safe nuclear
power‖
•―But if you‘re going to stay a rich and prosperous country, and if you‘re going to
help provide a global system of security, we‘ve got to rebuild confidence that
the government can indeed protect citizens and it can oversee this
industry and make sure that it‟s safe and reliable.”
•―There can‟t be any romanticism about alternative energy. If you‘re going
to be a modern, sophisticated economy, you have to address this question of
making nuclear power a legitimate source of energy.‖

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nb20121103d1.html

Atominiai ir
kariniai
ţemėlapiai

Galvosūkis:
―Skaidrumo testas‖

Tiesą apie
Pasaulio piliečių
sveikatos būklę
―reguliuoja‖
Tarptautinė
Atominės
Energijos
Agentūra !

Conflicting Mandates, Co-Opted Studies:
Atomic Energy Agency and the World Health Organization
Background: Conflicting Mandates
In 1959, the International Atomic Energy Agency(IAEA) and World
Health Organization(WHO) entered into an working agreement which is
out-of-date and conflicts with the research of the WHO to
determine the effects of ionizing radiation exposure on human
health. We are concerned that the language of this agreement (WHA
12.40 approved by the 12th World Health Assembly on 28 May 1959)
mingles promotion of nuclear technology, including nuclear power, with
the WHO‘s mandate to undertake international health research work on
people exposed to ionizing radiation-a product of this same nuclear
technology.
Specifically the WHO, as stated in its Constitution, has a mandate to
―promote and protect the health of all peoples.‖ Health is defined as ―not
merely the absence of disease or infirmity‖ but ―the enjoyment of the
highest attainable standard of health.‖ This highest attainable standard
―is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without
distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition.‖
In order to meet this objective, the WHO is ―to act as the directing and
co-ordinating authority on international health work… and to assist in
developing an informed public opinion among all peoples on matters of
health…‖
http://www.nirs.org/radiation/whoiaeastatment.pdf

No confidence in the International
Atomic Energy Agency June 3, 2011

Firstly, the IAEA needs to guard against the spreading of nuclear
weapons – among others by overseeing that no nuclear material from
the nuclear industry is diverted for military use.
You remember probably their missions to Iraq and Iran.
Secondly, the IAEA draws up nuclear safety standards. These are
used as benchmarks in virtually all nuclear countries.
In the European Union they are even enshrined in law.
Thirdly, it controls research on health issues surrounding radiation
that should then feed into its safety standards.
Fourthly, it promotes nuclear power. According to the statutes of the
agency, the objective of the IAEA is to ‗accelerate and enlarge the
contribution of atomic energy‟.

Can you begin to see the conflicts of interest here? An organisation
charged with promoting nuclear power around the world also controls
nuclear safety and health standards.
It‟s like expecting a tobacco company to prevent lung cancer.

http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/nuclear-reaction/no-
confidence-in-the-international-atomic-ene/blog/35120/

Greenpeace vs the United Nations.
The Chernobyl Body Count Controversy 18.04.2006
By Charles Hawley and Stefan Schmitt

In other words, coming up with a reliable estimate of the human costs of the
Chernobyl meltdown is politically loaded and extremely difficult. Everybody has a
guess, but they vary widely based on how a given study was designed and the
methodology used:
The IAEA says that 56 people died as a direct result of the
accident, including emergency workers sent in to fight the reactor fire
and nine children who died of thyroid cancer in the immediate vicinity.
The Ukraine Commission for Radiation Security claims that 34,499
emergency workers died as a result of having worked at the
disaster site.
An estimate by WHO from the year 2000 places the death toll among
emergency workers, radiation victims and suicide victims at
50,000.
The International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, a
group which won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985, says the death toll lies
between 50,000 and 100,000 among emergency workers and
those who helped in the clean up.
In a top secret report from mid-July, 1986, the Soviet communist
party put the toll at 26 dead.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/greenpeace-vs-the-united-nations-the-chernobyl-body-
count-controversy-a-411864.html

Kas tikrai
laukia mūsų
vaikų ir anūkų?

Kaţkada sūnau visa tai priklausys Tau!

Fušima
avarijos
pasekmės
Pasauliui?

http://www.amfir.com/AmFirstInst/NonToolbarTopics/Black_Ops/Japan_Quake-
Nuclear_Catastrophe_2011/Radiation_Forecasts/2011/03-20_03-26/Radiation_index.html

CNN:
We know contamination from Fukushima reactors is
still seeping into ocean -Researcher
Title: Radioactive levels staying high off Fukushima Daiichi in Japan
Source: CNN
By: Matt Smith
Date: October 25, 2012

―We can‘t say whether it‘s today‘s cooling water or from last April, but we
continue to see cesium in the ocean, directly at the plant, is
elevated,‖ he said.

But he added that those levels are ―not dangerously high — I don‘t think we
need to be alarmist about this.‖

[...] Tokyo Electric Power Company, has set up a system to absorb cesium
from reactor coolant water.
But not all that water is being recovered, Buesseler said. [...]

More US tuna contaminated — Study: Entire food web ―including
humans‖ may be affected as Fukushima radionuclides spread to
West Coast
Presented: Oct. 16, 2012 in Hiroshima, Japan
Title: Assessment and characterization of radionuclide concentrations from the Fukushima Reactor
release in the plankton and nekton communities of the Northern California Current
Delvan Neville (Oregon St. Univ.), Richard D. Brodeur (NOAA), A. Jason Phillips (OSU) and Kathryn Higley (OSU)

The incident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant released a substantial
radioactive contamination into the environment. With the predominant wind
and current flow in this part of the North Pacific, these radionuclides will
gradually spread to the US West Coast waters after a suitable period of
time, with the possibility of affecting food quality throughout the
food web (including humans). In addition to the passive transport by
currents and winds, the migratory pathways of large pelagic fish extend from
Japan to the Northern California Current. These organisms can serve as
transport vectors for these nuclides, especially given their capacity to
concentrate radionuclides from surrounding waters and prey. [...] By
predicting the radio-biologic stress (if any) for a managed species as more
Fukushima-related radionuclides are uptaken, appropriate action may be
taken before significant population effects have occurred.
Determination of natural background concentrations and high quality
transport models produced from these data also aid in management in the
event of a future accidental release, and in regulating safe activity releases.

Fukushima Radiation Concerns in Alaska:
No clams found in area — Salmon season canceled, population
too low — Large mammals with huge sores
Interview with Don Heckert, U.S. Air Force (Ret.)
Host: John B. Wells
Date Published: Oct. 23, 2012

Huge increase in tsunami debris for U.S. and
Canada on the way — Still over 100 times more to
reach coast over next few months
Title: 33,000 tons of debris to land in June The Environment Ministry
Source: Kyodo
projects that 33,000 tons of
Date: Nov. 11, 2012
tsunami debris will reach
[...] In April, it forecast that 41,300 tons North America by next June,
would reach North America by February. revising downward its earlier
The earlier study only predicted the amount estimates.
of debris that would reach waters within 10
km of the North American shoreline, but
the new calculations provide a more
accurate projection by also predicting how
many tons are likely to reach the
continent‘s shores.
Around 290 tons are expected to reach
North America by December, rising to 3,200
tons by February and 14,000 by April, the
latest analysis showed. But the new
estimates kept the total amount of debris
washed away from the three hardest-hit
prefectures -Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima -
unchanged at 1.33 million tons. [...]

TV: 200% as many radioactive products returned to
Japan this year than in 2011 says Russian report
Source: TBS/JNN
Date Aired: Oct 25, 2012
Date Published: Nov 6, 2012

According to the Russian news agency Prima Media, from January to
September in this year, the radiation dose exceeded of Russia standard
value was detected from 319 goods, such as used car, food, medical
supplies and others which were imported from Japan, to the Russian Far East
ports.

The Russia customhouse did not accept importing 284 goods, then, send
back to Japan.

145 goods send back to Japan in whole last year, due to the radiation
dose exceeded of standard value was detected in the Russian Far East area.

Augalai ir
gyvūnai
―kalba‖ apie
radiaciją

Gigantic mutated On 11/6/2012, On
sweet potato was deformed Japanese 11/7/2012, deforme
found in Yonezawa radish was found in d European pear (Le
city Yamagata as well. Yonezawa city Lectier) was found in
Five potatoes are Yamagata. Higashine city
connected to one It‘s 25cm long. Yamagata.
root. It weighs 15kg. It‘s 9cm high,
8cm wide.

KEDRAS
Extremely high radiation
levels of more than
250,000 becquerels per
kilogram of
radioactive cesium have
been detected in male
flowers of cedar trees in
the no-entry zone near the
damaged Fukushima
Daiichi nuclear power
plant.

http://enformable.com/2011/12/japan-male-cedar-flowers-found-with-more-than-
250000-bqkg-of-cesium/#ZAohCMoDSGtSZWUu.99

9/X/2011 Saulėgrąţa Sumidaku Tokyo

6/VI/2011 Baltoji roţė North Ibaraki

10/X/2011 Persimonas Tochici

30/IX/2011 Saldţioji bulvė Funabashi

Japoniškas ridikas Oshu Iwate

13/VII/2011 Pomidorai Saitama

Kyodo: Rice exceeds new cesium limit for first time
— 60 km from Fukushima plant
Title: Radioactive cesium level of Fukushima rice exceeds allowable limit
Source: Kyodo News
Date: Oct. 24, 2012

Ryţiai
Rice produced by a farmer in Sukagawa, Fukushima Prefecture, returned a
radioactive cesium reading of 110 becquerels per kilogram, exceeding the
regulatory maximum of 100, the prefectural government said Wednesday.

While it is the first time that the radiation level of Fukushima-produced
rice surpassed the current limits introduced in April, the rice produced by the
farmer has not been put on distribution channels, the local government said.

Of 320 bags of rice produced by the Sukagawa farmer, only a bag of the
Koshihikari brand of unpolished rice showed the excessive level of
radioactive cesium.

10 regions Drugeliai Fukushima

Two months after the Fukushima Daiichi
nuclear power plant accident
... much smaller wings and irregularly developed eyes ...

Elniavabalis

Mutated stag beetle of male head with female body,
―Probably the first case in Japan‖

Ţuvys
According to Tokyo
Electric Power Co. who
reported the disturbing
discovery, the fish
registered 25,800
becquerels of caesium
per kilo. That is 258
times the level the
government deems
safe for consumption.
What is even more
disturbing is that the
fish were caught 20
km away from the
plant, which raises all
sorts of questions
Read more: about what the effect
Japanese Fish Show Record Levels of Radiation on the region‘s wildlife
From Fukushima Nuclear Disaster has been.

Ţuvys

Japanese Fish Show Record Levels of Radiation From Fukushima Nuclear Disaster
Didesnis nei įprasta radioaktyvumo lygis žuvyse, pagaunamose prie Japonijos rytinių
krantų, galimai rodo, kad praėjus metams po Fukušimos atominės jėgainės katastrofos
į aplinką vis dar patenka pavojingų teršalų, sakoma naujo tyrimo išvadose.

2012 spalio 26d. 09:02

Ties Fukušimos atomine elektrine – nevalgomos, radiacijos paveiktos ţuvys
Ties Fukušimos atomine elektrine sugautų ţuvų radiacijos lygis vis dar išlieka aukštas.
JAV mokslininko teigimu, iš atominės jėgainės į vandenyną vis dar gali sklisti tarša.
„Didžioji dauguma Japonijoje sugautų žuvų nėra užterštos ir žmonėms nepavojingos―, – šią savaitę
žurnale „Science― skelbė Masačiusetse įsikūrusio okeonografijos instituto jūrų chemikas Kenas
Buesseleris.
Tiesa, tokios žuvys pagaunamos kituose regionuose, ties Fukušima jos paveiktos radiacijos.

Moliuskai (―suši‖)

Tokyo resident Namiko Murata had this to say to
Bloomberg:

"I'm really paying attention to food because of the
radiation problems," said Murata as she waited in line at
a Tokyo supermarket.

"We gave up eating fish even though my family likes it
very much. Now, for protein, we drink three cups of soy
milk a day."

Radioactive cesium level in fish off Fukushima not
declining

The requested article has expired,
and is no longer available. Any
related articles, and user
comments are shown below.

Radioactive beef over cesium limit from cow raised far outside
Fukushima… As Fukushima beef shipments to US resume this week
Title: Cesium above new limit in Miyagi beef
Source: Jiji
Date: Oct. 18, 2012

Jautiena
Radioactive cesium levels above the government‘s new limit have been found
in beef from Miyagi Prefecture, the prefectural government said.

Meat from a cow shipped by a farmer in Tome was found to contain more
than 150 becquerels of radioactive cesium per kilogram, the Miyagi
Prefectural Government said Wednesday.

The stricter limit of 150 becquerels for beef and rice took effect Oct. 1.
The previous limit was 500 becquerels per kilogram.
[...]

Miyagi Prefecture told the farmer not to ship any more cows until the
investigation is completed, and asked nearby ranchers to suspend
shipments voluntarily.

Apie radiaciją
―kalba‖ ir
vaikai

Fukušimos apylinkėse Japonijoje buvo ištirta 38
tūkst. vaikų sveikata. Paaiškėjo, kad praėjus
metams po branduolinės tragedijos daugiau nei
trečdalis (36 proc.) jų jau turi cistas ar gumbus
skydliaukėse, praneša „Fukushima Voice―.

Grėsmingus rezultatus paskelbė Fukušimos radioaktyvios taršos simptomų
tyrimų grupė.

Atkreipiamas dėmesys, kad Fukušimos tragedijos pasekmės
progresuoja žymiai greičiau nei Černobylio atveju.

Po avarijos Ukrainoje tyrimai parodė, kad auglius skydliaukėse turėjo vos
1,74 proc. 5-10 metų vaikų.
Skaitykite daugiau:
http://www.15min.lt/naujiena/aktualu/pasaulis/36-procentai-fukusimos-vaiku-jau-turi-
auglius-57-234880#ixzz2Btn6yoFU

Photographer: You can‘t fix what‘s happening in
Fukushima — Silence was something that I‘ve only
ever heard at Chernobyl (VIDEO)
Published: October 14th, 2012 at 2:13 am ET
Description: VICE accompanies photographer Donald Weber to the buffer zone at
Fukushima, Japan, where the eerie silence mirrors that at Chernobyl, and follow him as
he attempts to document the unfolding nuclear crisis.

In this silence, in the stillness
was something that I‟ve
only ever heard at
Chernobyl.[...]
I have a feeling that people
just don‟t really understand,
they‘re not grasping the whole
scope of the potentiality.
I think with the earthquake and
tsunami, yeah it was a
catastrophe, but it was an
engineering catastrophe, we
can fix this.
But you can‟t fix what‟s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bi3OA1tNFfo happening in Fukushima.

Atominė
elektrinė –
tai rizikos
sinonimas

North Anna, JAV -2011

5.8-magnitude
earthquake created a
state of emergency at
the North Anna
nuclear-power station
in central Virginia,
causing it to lose
electricity and
automatically shut
down, although
generators restored
power.

The North Anna Power Station declared an "alert" status, which is
the second lowest of four emergency situations.

August 24, 2011

Expert:
―There‘s another nuclear disaster‖ if operators
aren‘t able to connect temporary equipment in
flooding
Title: U.S. nuclear energy safety questioned
Source: UPI
Author: LINYI ZHANG
Date: Nov. 1, 2012

Tuesday‘s historic hurricane brought the issue into sharp focus as Oyster
Creek nuclear station — one of the oldest nuclear plants adjacent to the
Oyster Creek in New Jersey using Mark I boiling water reactor [identical to
the containment vessels used at Fukushima Daiichi] — declared an alert
because of high water levels.
The plant experienced power disruption but backup diesel fuel was able
to provide power for cooling.

But experts said if future events become more severe, under-designed
protections might fail. [...]

New Jersey, JAV - 2012

Uraganas Sandy
Salem Oyster Creek Indian Point

Tai kas
Lietuvoje
nebuvo
paskelbta

Russian Fires Scorch Forest Near Chernobyl

August 11, 2010

When wildfires swept Bryansk in 2002, the level of radioactive
contamination in the smoke reaching nearby regions was very low

Public-safety authorities in Germany, Lithuania, Sweden and Finland and
other nearby countries said the threat of smoke-borne radiation from
Russia was insignificant.

2002 metų rudenį kilo dideli gaisrai Briansko
srityje. Pakilo radiacija, vėjas pūtė Vilniaus
kryptimi. Tuo pat metu degė durpynai netoli
Vilniaus. Vilniuje buvo pranešta apie smogą, bet
apie 3 x 4 padidėjusią radiaciją – ne.
Rekomendacijos gyventojams, kaip elgtis padidinto
aplinkos oro užterštumo atvejais:

kuo daugiau laiko praleisti uţdarose patalpose;
vėdinant patalpas, langus ar orlaides uždengti
drėgna marška;
atsisakyti fizinio aktyvumo - sporto ir fizinio
darbo lauke, visuose švietimo - ugdymo įstaigose
nutraukti kūno kultūros pamokas lauke;
jei įmanoma, pasistengti išvykti iš didmiesčio,
ypač vyresnio amžiaus žmonėms ir mamoms su
kūdikiais bei asmenims, sergantiems bronchine
astma ir kitomis lėtinėmis kvėpavimo takų ligomis;
sergantiems lėtinėmis ligomis pasirūpinti vaistų
atsarga;
saugoti kvėpavimo takus, pridengiant juos
marlės kauke (raiščiu), marlės-vatos kauke(raiščiu)
ar respiratoriumi.

Ignalinos AE, 2010

Slepiama iki šiol. LIETUVA

Ar ţinote ką nustatė
EU
atlikę ―stress-test‖
Ignalinos atominėje
elektrinėje ?

Fukušimos
melo,
nutylėjimų ir
problemų
kaleidoskopas

Japonijos vyriausybė praėjus kelioms valandoms po pernai smogusio
galingo cunamio numatė, kad nuniokotos Fukušimos atominės jėgainės
reaktorių šerdys gali išsilydyti, tačiau praėjo daugiau nei
mėnuo, kol pareigūnai viešai pripažino šią grėsmę.

Vienas Prekybos ministerijos pareigūnas, atlikęs vyriausybės atstovo
vaidmenį po šios avarijos, buvo pakeistas, kai kovo 12 dieną užsiminė
apie reaktorių šerdžių išsilydymo galimybę.

Tik gegužę TEPCO pripažino, kad branduolinio kuro strypai
veikiausiai tikrai išsilydė, išprovokuodama kritikos bangą, jog
bendrovė ir pareigūnai stengiasi nuslėpti tikrąjį avarijos mastą.

BNS, 2012 kovo 9 d.

Fukushima radiation ‗underreported‘ —
Metal boxes in monitors are blocking radioactivity — Hundreds of
locations in multiple prefectures affected
Source: Kyodo
Date: Nov. 8, 2012

Tokyo Paper: Thick iron shielding placed below radiation monitoring
post — Dose was double 5 meters away
Journalist Shoji Ozawa reported that surface soil had been replaced and that
a thick iron shielding had been placed below a monitoring post in
Iitate that measured 1.2uSv.

He measured 2.4uSv when he walked 5m away from the post.
The Ministry of Education currently publishes less than 1uSv for Iitate.

Professor Imanaka of Kyoto University said that the current monitoring posts
are not usable at all.

Caldicott Live on TV as US Election Called:
―About half of Japan is contaminated‖ — Huge
censorship on what‘s happening with Fukushima…
Helen Caldicott Interview Democracy Now Election Special
Link TV
Nov. 6, 2012 at 11:00p ET

Dr. Helen Caldicott, Physician:
About half of Japan is contaminated. I‘m going there next week.
There‘s a huge, a very big press censorship on what‟s happening in
Japan with Fukushima.

Japanese receiving biased information — Hundreds
of thousands or more may die of cancer from
Fukushima disaster — It‘s all hidden from view
Dr Stephen Hickey, School of Biology, Chemistry and Health Science, Manchester
Metropolitan University, England; Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Technology,
Staffordshire University, England

And the information that they receive from the government and the
officials channels and the media is biased. Individuals in Japan and
anybody affected by the disaster have only one option and that is to take
responsiblity for themselves and their family. And to act as a rational human
being to take what measures are practicable and beneficial for themselves.
[...]

There are going to be at least tens of thousands and possibly hundreds
of thousand or more of people in the future dying of cancer or having
children with birth defects, but that once again is all hidden from view.

Fukushima reactor on track for cold shutdown by
year-end: TEPCO

Top Japan filmmaker dies after being hit by car — Interview: ―I was
planning to make something about the nuclear accident and
TEPCO‖… but changed my mind
Title: Japanese Director Koji Wakamatsu Dies at 76
Source: Hollywood Reporter
Author: Gavin J. Blair
Date: 10/17/2012
Japanese director Koji Wakamatsu died at 11 p.m. Wednesday from injuries
he sustained Oct. 12, when he was struck by a taxi while crossing a
busy road in central Tokyo. [...]
Earlier this month Wakamatsu had been to Busan International Film Festival
in Korea to receive the Asian Filmmaker of the Year Award for 2012.
Wakamatsu told The Hollywood Reporter in an interview on Friday, Sept. 28,
two weeks before the accident, that his left-wing, anti-authority political
views, which had got him harassed by the police in the 1960s and 1970s,
had never faltered.
[...]
Age had not diminished his passion or energy, having released three films
this year, he was talking about his next two projects weeks before his death,
an individualist to the end.
―I was planning to make something about the nuclear accident and
TEPCO, but everyone‘s doing stuff about that now, so I‘ve changed my
mind,‖ Wakamatsu told The Hollywood Reporter.

Japan Nuclear Expert: Humans must
‗decommission‘ Fukushima reactors — Robots can‘t
do anything basically
Interview with Hiroaki Koide
Filmed: Oct. 18, 2012
Published: Oct. 23, 2012
Translation: Fukushima Diary

Hiroaki Koide, Kyoto University Reactor Research Institute:
You should think robot can‘t do anything basically. It has nothing to do
with settling the situation.

[...] They can‟t be a help at all. [...]

Japan hasn‘t developed a robot for nuclear emergency at all on the
assumption that nuclear accident can never happen.

However, some European nations and US have such robots indeed, but their
capacity is very limited regardless of remote controlling technology.

After all, it must be done by human.

Report: 100,000 Tepco employees being sent to
Fukushima in 2013

Oct. 27 ,2012 report in Nikkei

In the mid-term administration plan, Tepco decided to send all of their
employees to Fukushima for decontamination from 2013.

They are sent to Fukushima for 2~3 times a year, about 100,000 people in
total will go to Fukushima annually.

This is not volunteer, this is obligation.

NHK: Concerns rising at Fukushima plant — 16,000
workers have quit, ‗severe working conditions‘
blamed

Title: TEPCO over-reports number of Fukushima workers
Source: NHK
Date: Nov. 5, 2012

[...] NHK found through an interview with TEPCO officials that only 8,000
workers are registered for the job, as of last month.

Earlier, the utility said there would be no manpower shortage as it had
secured about 24,000 workers.

But this figure represents the total number of people who have worked at the
crippled plant since the accident on March 11 last year.

16,000 workers have already quit the job. Many of them left due to severe
working conditions. [...]

ABC Footage of Anonymous Worker:
Radiation injuries after being at Fukushima plant

Title: Ex-Fukushima worker files lawsuit against TEPCO
Source: ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Author: North Asia correspondent Mark Willacy
Date: Nov 1, 2012 8:37pm AEDT

A former worker at the Fukushima nuclear plant has filed a lawsuit,
alleging the operator sent crews into highly radioactive areas without
proper protection

Asahi: Criminal charges for promoters of nuclear
power? Fukushima radiation victims want justice
Title: Second mass complaint coming over Fukushima disaster
Source: AJW by The Asahi Shimbun
Author: MASAKAZU HONDA
Date: November 02, 2012

More than 10,000 people from across Japan are seeking criminal
charges against officials of Japan‟s government and the utility that
operates the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant [...]

The group numbers about 10,850 individuals, from Hokkaido in the north to
Okinawa in the south. [...]

Complainants argued that a broadly backed complaint would show that the
general public is seeking criminal accountability for those who
promoted nuclear power—and hold them responsible for damage from the
disaster and for exposing victims to radiation. [...]

Japan Prince‘s Son:
No one died, no one got injured from Fukushima…
No one — No one is worried about radiation
Tsunekazu Takeda is the current President of the Japanese Olympic Committee [... He is] the third
son of Prince Tsuneyoshi Takeda. His great-grandfather was the Emperor Meiji

Title: INTERVIEW: Tokyo 2020 brushes aside Fukushima: ―No one died‖
Source: DPA
Author: By Sebastian Fest
Date: Nov. 1, 2012

[...] ―No one died, no one got injured from this event. No one,‖
Tsunekazu Takeda, president of the Japanese Olympic Committee (JOC) and
head of the bid, told dpa in an interview. [...]

Takeda, who was elected this year as a member of the International Olympic
Committe (IOC), stresses that Fukushima is no longer a problem.

―No one is worried about the tsunami or radiation. Last year we had
the 100th anniversary of the JOC, 34 IOC members including Jacques Rogge
visited us and they understood how is Tokyo now,‖ Takeda said. [...]

AP: ―Outrageous‖ — Japan nuclear engineer worries public
water supplies far beyond Fukushima plant could be at risk —
Contamination from below reactors may already be in
underground water system
Title: AP Interview: Japan Nuke Plant Water Worries Rise (PHOTOS)
Source: Associated Press
Author: MARI YAMAGUCHI (Malcolm Foster contributed to this report)

Japan Nuke Plant Water Worries Rise
[...] leaks in reactor facilities are allowing ground water pour in [at
Fukushima Daiichi] [...]
Nuclear engineer and college lecturer Masashi Goto said the contaminated
water buildup poses a long-term health and environmental threat. He worries
that the radioactive water in the basements may already be getting
into the underground water system, where it could reach far beyond the
plant, possibly the ocean or public water supplies.
―You never know where it‘s leaking out and once it‘s out you can never put it
back in place,‖ he said. ―It‘s just outrageous and shows how big a disaster
the accident is.‖ [...]
If it [radioactive water from Fukushima reactors] goes inland, Robert, I think
we‟re looking at a hundred years where people will not be able to
use that groundwater

Watch: Concern Japan gov‘t is manipulating
radiation readings — Levels nearby much higher
than some monitoring posts indicate
Follow-up to: Asahi Interview: Official radiation measurements are wrong -- Contaminated soil removed
near monitoring post -- Radioactivity now many times lower

Title: False hope: radiation monitoring in the Fukushima area
Source: Greenpeace International
Author: Greg McNevin
Date: Oct 23, 2012

Between October 16 and 19, Greenpeace checked 40 monitoring posts
throughout Fukushima city.

For 75% of them, the radiation readings close to the posts were lower than
readings for their immediate surroundings.

Contamination levels within 25 metres of the posts were up to six times
higher than at the posts themselves.

―We have found that in general the government monitoring stations
do not give a reliable indication of radiation risks‖ -Greenpeace
radiation expert
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b91VJ1KgwA

US Analysis: Fukushima released 200% as much radioactive iodine
as Chernobyl — Only includes Reactors 1 and 3
Title: March 13th, 2011 – NRC analysis shows Fukushima Daiichi worse than TMI and Chernobyl Accidents

Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Document Date: Mar. 13, 2011
Date Published: 10/17/2012

Red Cross labels Fukushima disaster ―ongoing humanitarian crisis‖ —
Physician: ―Difficult to reveal what potential health effects may
occur long term‖ — Official: ―It has not ended‖
Title: Red Cross labels Fukushima evacuations humanitarian crisis
Source: Asahi Shimbun
Author: HIROYUKI MAEGAWA

Last year‘s nuclear disaster is an ongoing “humanitarian crisis,‖
according to the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent
Societies (IFRC), which released its World Disasters Report 2012 on Oct. 16.

The report, subtitled ―Focus on forced migration and displacement,‖
described the March 2011 accident at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power
plant as a technological disaster leading to the ―evacuation and resettlement
of affected communities.‖

[...]
While the report said the radiation exposure doses in Fukushima Prefecture
are far lower than in Chernobyl, it quoted a physician as saying: ―It is
difficult to reveal what potential health effects may occur long term
stretching into the future.‖

Gov‘t Nuke Experts: Top part of Reactor 1
containment may have opened up before first
Fukushima explosion
Title: The Fukushima Accident: Research at the Service of Communication
Source: CIEMAT [Part of Spain's Ministry of Science and Technology])
Authors: Luis Enrique HERRANZ y Enrique GONZÁLEZ CIEMAT Nuclear Fission Division

Another plausible hypotheses is the loss of airtightness of the upper head
of the drywell which, according to studies performed in the 1990s,
under high pressure and temperature conditions, could lose its hermeticity
and allow gases to escape from the inside

Fukushima 3/11 Tapes: It‘s time to make a
―geezers‘ suicide squad‖ — ―We‘ve exhausted our
options‖ when discussing evacuation
Title: INSIDE FUKUSHIMA: How workers tried but failed to avert a nuclear disaster
Source: THE ASAHI SHIMBUN
Author: Toshihiro Okuyama, Hideaki Kimura and Takashi Sugimoto

[...] Personal radiation dosimeters worn by workers in the central control
room of the No. 3 and 4 reactors began to beep every three seconds. This
meant only one thing: Radiation levels were rising rapidly. [...]
―This is not good at all,‖ Yoshida muttered, 23 minutes later. ―This is
especially bad news for the No. 3 reactor, given what‘s been happening
there. And since we probably should anticipate a hydrogen explosion at the
No. 2 reactor, I‘ve ordered all workers to evacuate.‖

―The No. 2 reactor‘s seawater injection line is still not working,‖ he said. ―To
go there and get the line working again takes tremendous courage. But since
we now know that the safety-release valves can be opened, I was just
discussing with my people that it‘s time to put together a „geezers‟
suicide squad.‘‖

WSJ: Tepco in stunning reversal — Admits knowing
of problems before 3/11 and doing nothing… then
blames actions on anti-nuclear movement
Title: Japan Utility Says Nuclear Crisis Was Avoidable
Source: Wall St. Journal
Author: PHRED DVORAK
Date: October 12, 2012, 12:54 p.m. ET
In a stunning reversal, the operator of Japan‟s Fukushima Daiichi
power plant admitted for the first time Friday that it had made errors
of judgment that contributed to one of the world‘s worst nuclear accidents
last year.
[Tecpo] said in a report that the company failed to adequately prepare
for a disaster and that it knew it wasn‟t prepared, and yet it did
nothing, out of fear for the economic and social consequences.
―There was a worry that if the company were to implement a severe-accident
response plan, it would spur anxiety throughout the country and in the
community where the plant is sited, and lend momentum to the antinuclear
movement,‖ said the report, explaining what it described as the ―underlying
reasons‖ Tepco didn‟t have a good plan for such accidents. [...]
The report represents a shift in stance for Tepco, which had continued to
maintain it had done its best to prevent an accident from happening—despite
repeated criticism from government and private-sector panels that studied
events. [...]

Fukušimos
pasekmių
Ateities
scenarijai

Kinijos sindromas ?

http://fukushimaupdate.com/fukushima-update-day-280/

Top Nuclear Official: Japan in ―desperate, seemingly endless battle
with radiation‖ — ―Seemingly infinite damage to the daily life of
residents‖
Title: (1.7MB pdf) Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Stations of TEPCO
—Outline & lessons learned
Source: Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B; Vol. 88 (2012) No. 9 p. 471-484
Author: Shunichi Tanaka, Chairman Japan‘s Nuclear Regulation Authority
Date: Nov. 9, 2012

The severe accident that broke out at Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power
stations on March 11, 2011, caused seemingly infinite damage to the daily
life of residents. Serious and widespread contamination of the environment
occurred due to radioactive materials discharged from nuclear power stations
(NPSs). [...]

The accident has seriously contaminated the environment, such as houses,
farmland, forests and seacoasts, resulting in significant radiation exposure to
residents. After one year, there seems to be no concrete program to
recover from the damage to the environment and to nuclear power
applications, while the nation is forced to struggle with a desperate,
seemingly endless battle with radiation. [...]

NHK Documentary:
Recently deteriorating working conditions at Fukushima plant
causing workers to quit — Company hasn‘t been able to
recruit a single employee
Title: WANTED: Workers for
Fukushima Decommission
Source: NHK
Date: Nov 12, 2012

NHK Narrator: This company that manages and maintains nuclear plant
instruments hasn‟t been able to recruit a single worker for the plant
since the accident.

Yukiteru Naka, Chairman: If nothing changes there will be no young
workers at the plant in future. I think that‘s very clear.
[...]

NHK Reporter: Many workers in areas with high radiation levels are
quitting. They have to leave in around 3 months when their level of exposure
is at the safety limit.
Recently deteriorating working conditions are also making others leave.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=AdByg6RrcTc

Thousands protest against nuclear power in central
Tokyo
Source: Mainichi
Date: Nov 12, 2012

According to figures released by
demonstration organizer
Metropolitan Coalition Against
Nukes, roughly 100,000 people
took part in the protest. Police
put the figure at about 7,000.

"We don't need
nuclear power!"
chanted people

If you do not want to die, run away from Fukushima.

Title: Fukushima is not a city where people can live
Date: November 10, 2012

Sometimes, the nuclear victims of the
earlier nuclear escapades had children.

And those children often remember
precisely what happened to their parents,
and sometimes, to themselves,
as a result of nuclear ―mistakes‖.

The children of Fukushima will retain their
memories for a long time, and will perhaps
pass onto their children their recollections
of what some leaders calls an ―error‖.

Naujausios
―atominės‖
technologijos

―Fukušima lėkštė‖
"Fukushima Plate" Tells You If Your Sushi Is Radioactive

Radiacijos telefonas
New smartphone can measure radiation (but not its own)

You can finally put your radiation fears to rest and check your Twitter feed at
the same time.
Japanese cellphone carrier Softbank has unveiled a new smartphone that
can detect radiation levels with a built-in sensor, Wired is reporting.
Manufactured by Sharp, the Pantone 5 107SH has a built-in Geiger counter
that measures radiation within 20 percent accuracy.
Read more at http://venturebeat.com/2012/05/29/softban-pantone-5-with-geiger-
counter/#5z6HTQCfCBZXFbsX.99

Karščiausios
antiatominės
naujienos

The price of nuclear energy is going up and at the same time the
price of renewable energy is going down.

It makes more sense to move towards solar or wind energy.

Many delegates also raised the issue of ethical obligation of nuclear
waste disposal.

Trade Arabia reported that Bahrain has postponed its plans to adopt
nuclear energy as a source of power by 2017.

http://www.steelguru.com/middle_east_news/Bahrain_postpones_nuclear_energy_plans/288618.html

Energy
Power exports peak, despite nuclear phase-out

Date 11.11.2012
Author Günther Birkenstock

Renewable energy sources are booming in Germany, and electric
utilities exported more power in 2012 than ever before.

May 17th, 2011
Our group began out of a live blog run by Reuters about the Great East Japan
Earthquake and the related Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident.
We wanted the real news and a way to do something about this unprecedented
tragedy.
Our strength is in our diversity. People from around the globe, from varied
professions and industries came together to research, investigate, analyze and
educate about this ongoing incident.
Using the knowledge of the crowd for research and analysis of both the technical and
humanitarian aspects of complex incidents and concerns without focus on profit.

We have no affiliation or funding from any government, industry or university.

http://blog.imva.info/medicine/time-worry

Dr. Michio Kaku
Now he is weighing in with the threat from the spent-fuel pool in reactor
building No. 4 in focus saying, ―People don‘t realize that the Fukushima
reactor is on a knife‘s edge; it‘s near the tipping point.

A small earthquake, another pipe break, another explosion could
tip it over and we could have a disaster much worse, many times
worse than Chernobyl.

It‘s like a sleeping dragon.‖
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rrxmy6R3m90&feature=related

http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/Christopher_Busby

Christopher Busby
I have car air filters from Fukushima and Tokyo.

We have found high levels of radioactive particles in these.

In my March/April paper13 I predicted more than 200,000 additional
cancers in the next 10 years within a 200 KM radius of Fukushima.14

I have been hoping all along that I was wrong, and even now there may
be some good development that I had not expected or foreseen, but the
situation is bad and I am very sorry.

http://www.japanfocus.org/-Satoko-NORIMATSU2/3563

Dr. Helen Caldicott http://www.helencaldicott.com/

Fukushima Nuclear Disaster- You won't hear this
on the Main Stream News.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ITrXVJMKeQ

He served as an expert witness in the
investigation of the Three Mile Island
accident.[2]

Arnold "Arnie" Gundersen

Former nuclear industry senior vice president who has coordinated
projects at 70 nuclear power plants around the country.

Arnie provides independent testimony on nuclear and radiation issues
to the NRC, congressional and state legislatures, and government
agencies and officials in the U.S. and abroad.

He is the chief engineer at Fairewinds Associates.

Arnie co-wrote the new Greenpeace report, "Lessons from Fukushima."

http://www.democracynow.org/appearances/arnie_gundersen

He researches the safety
of nuclear reactors and
the radioactivity
measurement.

Assoc. prof. Hiroaki Koide
The accident level of INES (The International Nuclear Event Scale) at
the Fukushima First Nuclear Power Plant of Tokyo Electric Power
Company (TEPCO) was raised to 7 from 5 on 12th.

It‘s the same level of Chernobyl and the worst.

He has shifted his position of pro-nuke to anti-nuke, and then has
publicized the dangers of nuclear power generation for 40 years.

http://moshimoshimo.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/the-actual-condition-of-fukushima-first-nuclear-power-
plant-an-interview-with-hiroaki-koide-a-leader-of-antinuclear-power-movement/

Japanese engineer Masashi Goto, who helped
design the containment vessel for Fukushima's
reactor core

Masachi Goto

The engineer Masashi Goto says:
the design was not enough to withstand earthquakes or tsunamis and
the plant's builders, Toshiba, knew this.

He say:
that as the reactor uses mox (mixed oxide) fuel, the melting point is
lower than that of conventional fuel.

Should a meltdown and an explosion occur, he says, plutonium could be
spread over an area up to twice as far as estimated for a conventional
nuclear fuel explosion.

Iori Mochizuki

Living in Yokohama.
Occupation: Civil engineer
Occupation2: Exporting Japanese pop culture goods.

http://fukushima-diary.com/iori-mochizuki/

Секретно!
Масштабы катастрофы-ФУКУСИМЫ!

Истинные масштабы катастроф-ШОК!
Атомные электростанции выработанны,сроки эксплуатации вышли
во многих странах.
Жизнь всей планеты в опасности и все молчат.
Фукусима-взорвано 3 реактора,Чернобыль - 1 реактор.
Японцы молчат о истинных масштабах.
С Фукусимы радиация идет в океан уже почти 2 года -последствия
ужасающие!!!!

Так же в фильме рассказано о спутниках разведчиках с маленькими
атомными реакторами( 2 уже затопленно в Индийском океане).

Смотрите и передавайте всем !!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyHMdw0ARQ4&feature=youtu.be

―Atominės‖
lietuvių
valdţios mintys

D.Grybauskaitė: AE nauda abejoja maţiau nei
trečdalis balso teisę turinčių piliečių
www.DELFI.lt
2012 m. spalio 15 d. 11:09

D. Grybauskaitė
Naujos atominės jėgainės nauda abejoja mažiau nei trečdalis balso teisę
turinčių Lietuvos piliečių.

Nauja Vyriausybė ir Seimas turės atsižvelgti į dalies šalies gyventojų
nuomonę ir priimti Lietuvai naudingiausią sprendimą, - prezidentės nuomone
perdavė patarėja Daiva Ulbinaitė.

V.Adamkus patariamąjį referendumą dėl AE vadina
nesąmone
BNS
2012 m. rugpjūčio 7 d. 13:16

V. Adamkus
"Tokia nesąmonė skelbti referendumą apie elektrinės statymą ar nestatymą.

Tai pasityčiojimas iš tautos ir iš viso tokį klausimą kelti referendume
kaip rekomendacinį. O jeigu tauta nuspręs – nestatyti, o Vyriausybė
nuspręs – statyti?" - žurnalistams sakė V.Adamkus, antradienį parlamento
rūmuose sveikinęs Pasaulio lietuvių bendruomenės Seimą.

"Patys prieš save apsijuoksime", - tvirtino jis.

Kubilius: mums reikia naujos atominės elektrinės
2012-10-09 17:17 ELTA

A. Kubilius
Fukušima įvyko dėl cunamio, kurio mes čia, Baltijos šalyse, nesitikime.

I. Degutienė: Lietuvoje AE privalo būti pastatyta
Elta
2012-10-17 10:14

I. Degutienė
Nors dauguma balsavusiųjų sekmadienį referendume dėl planuojamos
Visagino atominės elektrinės pasisakė prieš naująją jėgainę, Seimo
Pirmininkė Irena Degutienė teigia, kad savą atominę Lietuva privalo
turėti.

... skalbimo mašinos gedimą bando palyginti su gedimais AE ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcwbSoB95HA

Būsimą Lietuvos atominę jėgainę drebina kritikų
strėlės
Gediminas Stanišauskas, „Valstiečių laikraštis―
2011 m. kovo 16 d. 13:29

R. Ţilinskas
„Įvykiai Japonijoje niekaip nepakoreguos mūsų planų statyti atominę
elektrinę, nes net ir nenaujausios branduolinės technologijos parodė,
kad jos yra saugios“, – tikino Rokas Žilinskas.

Reaktoriai Fukušimos AE buvo įrengti prieš 30–40 metų.
R.Žilinsko teigimu, Japonijoje sprogo ne reaktoriai.

„Mūsų reikalas yra formuoti visuomenės nuomonę, kad branduolinė
energetika net nelaimių akivaizdoje yra saugi―, – akcentavo R.Žilinskas.

A. Čekuolis: Rusijos sąjungininkas – kai kurių mūsų
ţmonių kvailumas
Mindaugas Jackevičius
2012 m. spalio 15 d.
Didžiausias Rusijos sąjungininkas –
žmonelių kvailumas

A. Čekuolis
Čekuolio tvirtinimu, šiuo metu pasaulyje dirba 500 atominių jėgainių,
dar 150 statoma.
Pasak jo, per maždaug 35 metus būta 6 sutrikimų ir avarijų –
tai daug rečiau, nei genda automobiliai ir garvežiai.

A. Čekuolis aiškina, kad Fukušimos atominėje žuvo tik du žmonės –
palyginimui Lietuvos keliuose per savaitę žūsta daugiau dviratininkų.
Atominės energetikos entuziastas taip pat primena, kad nuotraukose iš
kosmoso Lietuva atrodo juoda – esą kas gali investuoti į tokią šalį.

http://www.diena.lt/naujienos/ekonomika/a-cekuolis-rusijos-sajungininkas-kai-kuriu-musu-zmoniu-kvailumas-454805

B. Vėsaitė
Politikės B. Vėsaitės citata:
“Esu branduolinės energetikos entuziastė.
Dar daugiau.
Noriu pasakyti, kad tiek Europoje, tiek pasaulyje
vyksta branduolinės energetikos renesansas.
Europos šalys atnaujina savo branduolines jėgaines ir
stato naujas, nes tai efektyviausia priemonė pristabdyti
klimato kaitą planetoje ir mažinti anglies dvideginio
emisijas.

Be to, branduolinė elektros energija yra pigiausia po
hidroelektros energijos, įskaitant branduolinę saugą,
atliekų saugojimą bei laidojimą‖.

Hitachi― ţada Visagine statyti atominę elektrinę,
patobulintą pagal Fukušimos avarijos patirtį
Lietuvos Rytas, Andrius Sytas
2011-06-16 11:30

Balandį Japonijoje įvyko rimta avarija Fukušimos atominėje
elektrinėje.

Žemės drebėjimo metu ji išsijungė, tačiau dėl drebėjimo sukelto
cunamio neįsijungė atsarginiai siurbliai, turėję šaldyti reaktorius.

Įsiplieskus gaisrams reaktoriuose, į aplinką pateko radiacija, o patys
reaktoriai sugedo nebepataisomai.

Švieţiausios
―neAtominės‖
lietuvių
valdţios mintys

Atsisakius atominės energetikos, Lietuva grįţtų į
akmens anglies laikus
„Atsisakius atominės energetikos,
Lietuva grįţtų į akmens anglies laikus―
Sako premjero Andriaus Kubiliaus
patarėjas energetikos klausimams
Kęstutis Škiudas.
Kalbino: Rimantas Varnauskas, Alfa.lt

K. Škiudas
Tačiau praradimai bus ne tik finansiniai, o ir valstybės prestižo, nes kol kas nėra
pateikiami jokie aiškesni paaiškinimai, kodėl šis projektas netinka.
Dar šiek tiek dėl nuostolių. Šiuo metu visiškai neaišku, kaip ateityje Lietuva, atsisakiusi
atominės energetikos, gamins elektros energiją ir ar apskritai ją gamins.
Nes matosi, kad jokios realios alternatyvos neturima.

Kokia tai suma? Jei jis bus nutrauktas, ar reikės mokėti kaţkokias
netesybas?
Jokių netesybų nebus, nes jokių įpareigojančių sutarčių nėra. Tiek, kiek
partneriai investavo, tiek ir yra jų pačių atsakomybė.
Lietuva jau yra investavusi virš 100 mln. litų.

Tai dabar
pagalvokime
―Ką mums siūlo
―Hitachi‖?

Japanese tread radioactive water, attempt damage control
Haejin Song, Staff Writer
November 12, 2012
Filed under World & Nation

Currently, about 200,000 tons of radioactive water, enough to fill
more than 50 Olympic-sized swimming pools, are stored in gigantic
tanks built around the nuclear power plant, reported news source Al Jazeera.

The company predicts that the amount of water will triple within 3years.
―If you‘ve been exposed to Cesium because you‘re a nuclear power
worker, even after you‘re long dead and buried, your gravesite will be
radioactive,‖ said physicist Michio Kaku on CBS‘s ―60 Minutes.‖
Japan Nuclear Engineer:
―Mind-blowing… truly outrageous‖ — Many massive pools of
contaminated water are spread around Fukushima plant

―Your great grandkids can come with Geiger
counters and see that great granddaddy still has
radiation.‖

Fukušima – gyvai

http://www.youtube.com/user/tbsnewsi/featured

Fukushima pranesimas

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Similar to Fukushima pranesimas

Similar to Fukushima pranesimas (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Fukushima pranesimas

Editor's Notes