Scenario convergence 2013_2014

Inquiry-Based Science
Teaching Scenarios
FIP CO320 Course Introduction
S. Garlatti
JM. Gilliot
I. Rebai

Teaching V. 1

Inquiry Based Science Teaching: IBST V. 1


IBST features
• Authentic and problem-based learning activities which are illdefined and have several answers
• A certain amount of experimental procedures, experiments and
activities involving practical experience of equipment and
including searching for information;
• Self regulated learning sequences where student autonomy is
emphasized;
• Discursive argumentation and communication with peers
("talking science").

page 2

Convergences mobile, sémantique, ubiquitaire, pervasif - FIP CO320

 The

complete problem

• Problem 1: understand the industrial landscape in
the area of the bridge (Brest is a shipbuilding
arsenal for the Navy).
• Problem 2: understand what is the historical and
technological method of problem solving that led to
the construction of the swinging bridge.
• Problem 3: understand the rotating mechanism of
the swinging
http://plates-formes.iufm.fr/ressources-ehst/spip.php?rubrique17

page 3



page 4

Vestige


Prototypical Scenario
1. Problem analysis in small groups
2. Activation of prior knowledge
3. Elaboration of a strategy to find needed information

(define collaborative and cooperative activities)
4. Collaborative work and exploitation
5. Collaborative report writing

6. Institutionalization / discussion

page 5




Historical reading and understanding of an
industrial landscape (scenario stage 4)
• Photograph all elements of the current landscape with historical
aspects about cranes and bridges of the arsenal,

• Locate the different elements on a current map of Brest,
• Identify and photograph the actual bridges and cranes linked
existing bridges and cranes from previous: what continuities ?
What ruptures?
• Store and publish information on the corresponding tools.

page 6


Teaching V. 2

Web 1.0 – Web 2.0

Webmestre

Site Web

Utilisateur

Utilisateur

Utilisateur
page 8


Réseaux sociaux & nuages
Données
&
Traitements

•Self Generated content
•Blogs
•Wikis
•Balisage (tags)
•Gestion collective de liens
(social bookmarking)
page 9

Brouillage entre
formel et informel

•Recherche
•Fils de nouvelles
•Syndication
•Filtrage
•Recommandation

Visualisations variées
Identité
numérique

Mobilité et objets

•Localisation
•Identification
•Reconnaissance

Données
&
Traitements

Wikitude
6th sense
Ville augmentée

page 10


•Localisée
•Intégré dans
l’environnement
•Consolidée

•Partout
•Toujours
•Interconnecté ?
•Contextuel ?

Prototypical Scenario
1. Problem analysis in small groups
2. Activation of prior knowledge
3. Elaboration of a strategy to find needed information

(define collaborative and cooperative activities)
4. Collaborative work and exploitation
5. Collaborative report writing

6. Institutionalization / discussion

page 11


 Smartphones

• Camera,
• GPS
• Network access
 Three

groups

• Site visit

• Information seeking in navy museum
• Information seeking in local public records
page 12


 Recommend

suitable entities
Resources, activities, tools, persons, …
– Depending on the current situation without any human
interventions

 Push

mode

• Groups or individuals can be notified according to
the situation changes.

• The group/individual can select or not one of the
given recommendations.

page 13


 Three

Push modes

• Recommend information from Navy museum and
local public records retrieved by other group
members or subgroup according to the needed
domain concepts identified on the port and/or the
current activities
• Recommend and provide information from subgroup
visiting the port to other subgroups or group
members

• Recommend checking some domain concepts
missed by students or subgroups on the port.
page 14


 Pull

Mode

• A query filters concepts, resources, activities and
persons
• Write queries
- On relevant domain concepts like “crane”, “bridge”, etc.
according to the current context (activities and localization),
- On retrieved information from other group members or
subgroups according to activities and/or localization

page 15


 Is-it

possible to manage

• Context Awareness,
• Adaptation
• Seamless Learning
By Search engine like

page 16



We need a kind of

page 17


Activities

Tool families

Content produced

Searching
information

Search engines,
Social book-marking,
Blogs, Wikis, etc.

Shared bibliography
Annotations, Notes,
images, videos, etc.,
potentially geo-localised.

Site visit

Smart terminal with
Camera, GPS and
CMS

Group
Chat, Microblogging,
communication
Voice, Video, etc.

page 18

Geo-localised text, pictures,
videos.
Real-time information
sharing for work group
coordination.


Activities
Collaborative
Collected Data
analysis
Collaborative
Report writing

Tool families
Maps
Mind map tools.
Shared bibliography
Annotations, Notes,
Images, Videos, etc.
and Collaborative
Writing Tools

Peer assessment Collected Group work

page 19

Content produced
Knowledge restructuration

Final report : knowledge
construction

Quality analysis, Hints,
Rating based on an
assessment scheme


Conclusions
 Convergence

of

1. WEB 2.0 Tools
2. Ubiquitous & Mobile Computing
3. Semantic Web
Main Issue
How could we change our practices and/or activities to
enhance user’s experiences?

page 20


Google Glass
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vG9vfjdcmRw
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRrdeFh5-

io&list=PLyR4fvjGTgA47JSh5X4sVoUdigAbJiNo&index=4

page 23

Scenario convergence 2013_2014

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a Scenario convergence 2013_2014

Semelhante a Scenario convergence 2013_2014 (20)

Mais de Serge Garlatti

Mais de Serge Garlatti (20)

Último

Último (20)

Scenario convergence 2013_2014