2. IntroducciónAnatomía
Juicio, técnica y atención a los detalles
Incidencia:
• Abierta 0.1 a 0.2 %
• Laparoscopica 0.4 a 0.6 %
• 750 000 Colecistectomias laparoscopicas
• Trauma hepatico 0.5%
Iatrogenic Biliary Injuries: Classification, Identification, and Management Kenneth J. McPartland, MDa,b, James J.
Pomposelli, MD, PhD Clin N Am 88 (2008) 1329–1343
8. Impacto
Iatrogenic bile duct injury-a cost analysis ROLAND ANDERSSON, KARIN ERIKSSON, PER-JONAS BLIND &
BOBBY TINGSTEDT HPB, 2008; 10: 416-419
Costos segun el tipo de lesión
12. Factores de Riesgo
Factor OR
sexo masculino 1.92
hospital escuela 2.16
Pancreatitis 2.5
Colangiografia 0.5
Fletcher et al. annals of surgery 1999
13. Mecanismos
Mala interpretacion de las estructuras anatomicas
(97%)
errores tecnicos (3%)
Incapacidad o resistencia de realizar colangiografia
excesiva retraccion cefalica del fondo
Poca retraccion lateral del infindubulo
Prevention of Biliary Leaks. Nathaniel J. SopeJ Gastrointest Surg (2011) 15:1005–1006
Causes and Prevention of Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injuries Analysis of 252 Cases From a Human Factors and
Cognitive Psychology PerspectiveLawrence W. Way, MD,* Lygia Stewart, MD ANNALS OF SURGERY Vol. 237, No.
4, 460–469
14. Mecanismos
Uso excesivo del cauterio
excesiva retraccion lateral del infindibulo
radical derecho de insercion baja
Prevention of Biliary Leaks. Nathaniel J. SopeJ Gastrointest Surg (2011) 15:1005–1006
Causes and Prevention of Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injuries Analysis of 252 Cases From a Human Factors and
Cognitive Psychology PerspectiveLawrence W. Way, MD,* Lygia Stewart, MD ANNALS OF SURGERY Vol. 237, No.
4, 460–469
15. Esquema mental
Causes and Prevention of Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injuries Analysis of 252 Cases From a Human Factors and
Cognitive Psychology PerspectiveLawrence W. Way, MD,* Lygia Stewart, MD ANNALS OF SURGERY Vol. 237,
No. 4, 460–469
16. Visiones heuristica
Causes and Prevention of Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injuries Analysis of 252 Cases From a Human Factors and Cognitive
Psychology PerspectiveLawrence W. Way, MD,* Lygia Stewart, MD ANNALS OF SURGERY Vol. 237, No. 4, 460–469
■ Si no consigues entender un problema, dibuja un esquema.
■ Si no encuentras la solució n, haz como si ya la tuvieras y mira qué
puedes deducir de ella (razonando a la inversa).
■ Si el problema es abstracto, prueba a examinar un ejemplo concreto.
19. Prevencion
Maniobra critica
uso de lente angulado
mantenerse cerca a la vesicula
Minimizar el uso del cauterio
Ver las puntas de los clips
colangiografia transoperatoria?¿
22. Prevencion
Prevention of iatrogenic bile duct injuries in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies: is the naso-biliary drain the answer?
Chandika A. H. Liyanage Æ Yoshihiko
colangiografia por el dreanje nasobiliar
23. tecnicas visualizar estructuras
Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future
patient safety interventions K. Tim Buddingh • Vincent B. Nieuwenhuijs Surgical Endoscopy 2011
28. Clasificacion de Stewart-way
Class I refers to the incomplete sectionof
bile duct with no loss of tissue. It has a
prevalence rate of 7%. The first mechanism of injury
is a misleading recognition of the common hepatic
duct with the cystic duct but is rectified and results in
only a small loss of tissue with no complete section of
the bile duct. The second mecha- nism refers to the
lateral injury of the common hepatic duct which
results from the cystic duct opening extension during
cholangiography. The former represents 72% and the
latter 28% of class I cases.
Class I refers to the incomplete sectionof
bile duct with no loss of tissue. It has a
prevalence rate of 7%. The first mechanism of injury
is a misleading recognition of the common hepatic
duct with the cystic duct but is rectified and results in
only a small loss of tissue with no complete section of
the bile duct. The second mecha- nism refers to the
lateral injury of the common hepatic duct which
results from the cystic duct opening extension during
cholangiography. The former represents 72% and the
latter 28% of class I cases.
Class II is a lateral injury of the common hepatic duct
that leads to stenosis or bile leak. It is the
consequence of thermal damage and clamping the
duct with surgical
staples. It has a prevalence of 2% with a concomitant
he- patic artery injury in 18% of cases. T-tube related
injuries are included within this class.
Class II is a lateral injury of the common hepatic duct
that leads to stenosis or bile leak. It is the
consequence of thermal damage and clamping the
duct with surgical
staples. It has a prevalence of 2% with a concomitant
he- patic artery injury in 18% of cases. T-tube related
injuries are included within this class.
Class III is the most common (61% of cases) and rep-
resents the complete section of the common hepatic
duct. It is subdivided in to type IIIa, remnant
common hepatic duct; type IIIb, section at the
confluence; type IIIc, loss of confluence; and type
IIId, injuries higher than confluence with section of
secondary bile ducts. It occurs when the common
hepatic duct is confounded with the cystic duct,
leading to a complete section of the common hepatic
duct when resecting the gallbladder. A concomitant
injury of right hepatic artery occurs in 27% of cases
Class III is the most common (61% of cases) and rep-
resents the complete section of the common hepatic
duct. It is subdivided in to type IIIa, remnant
common hepatic duct; type IIIb, section at the
confluence; type IIIc, loss of confluence; and type
IIId, injuries higher than confluence with section of
secondary bile ducts. It occurs when the common
hepatic duct is confounded with the cystic duct,
leading to a complete section of the common hepatic
duct when resecting the gallbladder. A concomitant
injury of right hepatic artery occurs in 27% of cases
Class IV describes the right (68%) and accessory right
(28%) hepatic duct injuries with concomitant injury of
the right hepatic artery (60%). Occasionally it includes
the common hepatic duct injury at the confluence
(4%) besides the accessory right hepatic duct lesion.
Class IV has a prevalence of 10%[11,12].
Class IV describes the right (68%) and accessory right
(28%) hepatic duct injuries with concomitant injury of
the right hepatic artery (60%). Occasionally it includes
the common hepatic duct injury at the confluence
(4%) besides the accessory right hepatic duct lesion.
Class IV has a prevalence of 10%[11,12].
30. Diagnostico
Transoperatorio
salida de bilis del higado o porta hepatis
observar un segundo conducto o arteria cistica
USG Doppler estrechez de la via biliar
Salida de bilis de una estructura tubular u otro sitio
distinto a la vesicula
ecause 12% to 32% of patients who have laparoscopic
cholecystectomy– associated bile duct injury have a
concomitant arterial injury and vascular injury
significantly increases morbidity and mortality and may
increase the incidence of later stricture formation
ecause 12% to 32% of patients who have laparoscopic
cholecystectomy– associated bile duct injury have a
concomitant arterial injury and vascular injury
significantly increases morbidity and mortality and may
increase the incidence of later stricture formation
31. Diagnostico Trans-
operatorio
Tejido fibroso en la el lecho vesicular
linfaticos rodeando al conducto cistico
conducto cistico que no se puede ligar
un cistico que se va sin interrupcion hasta el duodeno
75% inadvertidas
22% tuvieron protocolos que expusieron la dificultad
Causes and Prevention of Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injuries Analysis of 252 Cases From a Human Factors and Cognitive
Psychology PerspectiveLawrence W. Way, MD,* Lygia Stewart, MD ANNALS OF SURGERY Vol. 237, No. 4, 460–469
32. Porcentaje de deteccion
intraoperatoria
Bile Duct Injury during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy : Risk Factors, Mechanisms, Type, Severity and Immediate Detection
J.-Fr. Gigot Acta chir belg, 2003, 103, 154-160
34. errores en
diagnostico
Ileo, distension y dolor abdominal
Falla en reconocer el drenaje bilioso persistente
Regreso al cuarto de urgencia
No realizar colangiografia previo a la LPE
no encontrar el sitio de lesion
Surgical manajement of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders. L bumgart 2nd edition
36. CPRE
Fuga del muñon del cistico vs lesion
intra/extrehepatica
Coledocolitiasis
Limitacion en oclusiones y ligaduras
e missed on ERCP (6). Aberrant right posterior
segmental duct injuries are often suspected in the
setting of clinical or imaging evidence of a bile leak
(perihepatic fluid collection on postcholecystectomy
cross-sectional imaging or copious bil- ious output
from surgical drains) but “normal” ERCP
e missed on ERCP (6). Aberrant right posterior
segmental duct injuries are often suspected in the
setting of clinical or imaging evidence of a bile leak
(perihepatic fluid collection on postcholecystectomy
cross-sectional imaging or copious bil- ious output
from surgical drains) but “normal” ERCP
37. Colangiografía Transhepática
identifacion de la anatomia
busqueda de fugas, estrecheces
tutor y drenaje
Cholangiography is used to distinguish between a
transected duct, a completely occluded duct, and a
duct that has been partially obstructed.
Cholangiography is used to distinguish between a
transected duct, a completely occluded duct, and a
duct that has been partially obstructed.
Accuracy of Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography in Predicting the Location and Nature of Major Bile Duct Injuries Nicholas Fidelman, MD, Robert K.
Kerlan, Jr., MD, Jeanne M. LaBerge, MD, and Roy L. Gordon, MDJ Vasc Interv Radiol 2011;10.1016/j.jvir.2011.02.007
45. Tratamiento
Reduccion de la presion
distal
Endoscopico o Tubo en T
fuga de alto y bajo grado
Strasberg A
Evaluation and Treatment of Biliary Leaks after Gastrointestinal Surgery
Gary C. Vitale & Brian R. DavisJ Gastrointest Surg DOI 10.1007/s11605-011-1513
46. Tratamiento
Manejo Conservador
Casos refractarios: drenaje
percutaneo resecciones
segmentarios
Strasberg b
Segmentary bile duct occlusion is the etiological factor
in this type of injury. If mild pain and elevation of
liver function tests are present with no clinical
impairment, conservative management is followed.
The presence of moderate and severe cholangitis
makes the drainage of the occluded liver segment
necessary.
Segmentary bile duct occlusion is the etiological factor
in this type of injury. If mild pain and elevation of
liver function tests are present with no clinical
impairment, conservative management is followed.
The presence of moderate and severe cholangitis
makes the drainage of the occluded liver segment
necessary.
49. Tratamiento
Manejo Conservador
Drenajes externos
Hepatectomia
Derivacion biliodigestiva/
Drenaje percutaneo
Strasberg c
As in Strasberg B injury, an accessory right duct is sec- tioned but the proximal
stump is not detected and oc- cluded, with an unnoticed bile leak as a
consequence. No continuity exists with the rest of the bile duct system, leaving
endoscopy out of the therapeutic options.
Subhepatic collections are frequent in the postopera- tive setting. These must be
drained in order to avoid bili- ary peritonitis and septic shock.
It is common that the bile leak is occluded spontane- ously with no other
intervention maintaining a controlled bile leak through external drains. If this does
not happen, therapeutic options are the same that Strasberg B injury, biliodigestive
derivation to segmentary ducts (also with poor long term prognosis), percutaneous
drainage and hepatectomy.
As in Strasberg B injury, an accessory right duct is sec- tioned but the proximal
stump is not detected and oc- cluded, with an unnoticed bile leak as a
consequence. No continuity exists with the rest of the bile duct system, leaving
endoscopy out of the therapeutic options.
Subhepatic collections are frequent in the postopera- tive setting. These must be
drained in order to avoid bili- ary peritonitis and septic shock.
It is common that the bile leak is occluded spontane- ously with no other
intervention maintaining a controlled bile leak through external drains. If this does
not happen, therapeutic options are the same that Strasberg B injury, biliodigestive
derivation to segmentary ducts (also with poor long term prognosis), percutaneous
drainage and hepatectomy.
50. Tratamiento
Rafia Primaria - Drenaje
percutanea - endoscopia
con Esfinterotomia/Protesis
Desvacularización
Tratamiento quirúrgico
ultima opción
Strasberg D
In the setting of a devascularized duct, even if small
5-0 absorbable stitches are used, a bile leak will develop during the first postoperative week
with concomitant bile collections. Management of these cases requires a mul- tidisciplinary
approach with endoscopy and radiological- guided drainage as the first therapeutic options.
Surgery is the last resource of treatment when a loss of bile duct tissue is present and migration
of a Strasberg D to E in- jury has taken place.
In the setting of a devascularized duct, even if small
5-0 absorbable stitches are used, a bile leak will develop during the first postoperative week
with concomitant bile collections. Management of these cases requires a mul- tidisciplinary
approach with endoscopy and radiological- guided drainage as the first therapeutic options.
Surgery is the last resource of treatment when a loss of bile duct tissue is present and migration
of a Strasberg D to E in- jury has taken place.
61. Claves anatomicas
Circulacion 3 y 9 horas
60% de la circulacion tiene
una direccion cefalocaudal
las anastomosis altas no
dependen de la arteria
hepatica derecha
62. Perlas del exitoerradicar la sepsis e
inflamacion
usar tejido viable
una capa mucosa-mucosa
monofilamento absorbible
sin tension
protesis no son mandatarias
cirujano con experiencia
63. Resumen del Cohorte de los tres
periodos
Classification and management of bile duct injuries Miguel Angel Mercado, Ismael Domínguez J
64. Recomendaciones
Lesion de via biliar laparoscopica
No convertir
dejar drenajes y referir
Hacer hemostasia
anastomosis Amplias
diferir procedimientos en casos de sepsis o falla
organica multipleClassification and management of bile duct injuries Miguel Angel Mercado, Ismael Domínguez J Gastrointest Surg 2011
April 27; 3(4): 43-48
67. Reparacion temprana vs Tardia
No hay estudios aleatorizados
strasberg recomienda esperar 12 semanas*
Mercado no hubo diferencias entre el manejo
temprano y tardio (75 pacientes)
*Strasberg SM, Picus DD, Drebin JA (2001) Results of a new strategy for reconstruction of
biliary injuries having an isolated right-sided component. J Gastrointest Surg 5: 266–274
68. Cirugía
Hepatectomía
Daño irreversible del radical
Daño de la arteria Hepatica
Classification and management of bile duct injuries Miguel Angel Mercado, Ismael Domínguez J Gastrointest Surg 2011 April
27; 3(4): 43-48
71. Contribución de los tratamientos al periodo
de enfermedad
Surgical manajement of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders. L bumgart 2nd
edition
72. Pronostico
43 % de morbilidad luego de una reconstruccion
6 a 22% desarrollan enfermedad hepatica cronica
1.7 a 9% de mortalidad
Dilataciones y Stents
33% de las lesiones proximales a confluencia
desarrollan estrecheces
90% de éxito
73. The Good Surgeon believes what he sees, The Bad Surgeon sees wha
he believes.
Richard I Cook Cognitive Technologies Laboratory Chicago
74. Bibliografia
1. Iatrogenic bile duct injury-a cost analysis ROLAND ANDERSSON, KARIN ERIKSSON, PER-JONAS BLIND &BOBBY TINGSTEDT HPB,
2008; 10: 416-419
2. Prevention of Biliary Leaks. Nathaniel J. SopeJ Gastrointest Surg (2011) 15:1005–1006r
3. Accuracy of Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography in Predicting the Location and Nature of Major Bile Duct Injuries
Nicholas Fidelman, MD, Robert K. Kerlan, Jr., MD, Jeanne M. LaBerge, MD, and Roy L. Gordon, MDJ Vasc Interv Radiol
2011;10.1016/j.jvir.2011.02.00
4. Evaluation and Treatment of Biliary Leaks after Gastrointestinal SurgeryGary C. Vitale & Brian R. DavisJ Gastrointest Surg DOI
10.1007/s11605-011-1513
5. Classification and management of bile duct injuries Miguel Angel Mercado, Ismael Domínguez J Gastrointest Surg 2011 April 27;
3(4): 43-4
6. Surgical manajement of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders. L bumgart 2nd editio
7. Strasberg SM, Picus DD, Drebin JA (2001) Results of a new strategy for reconstruction of biliary injuries having an isolated right-sided
component. J Gastrointest Surg 5: 266–274
75. Bibliografia
9. Bile Duct Injuries in the Era of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies Yuhsin V. Wu, MDa, David C. Linehan, MDb,* Clin N Am 90
(2010) 787–802
• Causes and Prevention of Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injuries Analysis of 252 Cases From a Human Factors and Cognitive
Psychology PerspectiveLawrence W. Way, MD,* Lygia Stewart, MD ANNALS OF SURGERY Vol. 237, No. 4, 460–469
• Prevention of iatrogenic bile duct injuries in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies: is the naso-biliary drain the answer?
• Chandika A. H. Liyanage Æ Yoshihiko J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg (2009) 16:458–462 Postoperative Bile Duct Injuries
Kourosh F. Ghassemi, MD, and Janak N. Shah, MDTech Gastrointest Endosc 8:81-91 2006
• Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety
interventions K. Tim Buddingh • Vincent B. Nieuwenhuijs Surgical Endoscopy 2011
• The Hepp-Couinaud Approachto StricturesoftheBileDucts AlbertusMyburgh. Annals of Surgery Vol 218 No 5 1993
• Lesiones de vias Biliares. Miguel Mercado. 2005
• Surgical manajement of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders. L bumgart 2nd edition
Notas do Editor
las diferencias entre lesiones ocurren antes de las 30 o 50 colecistectomia
1 lesion por cada mil colecistectomias
90% arteria cistica
areria hepatica derecha en 80%
los conductos biliares accesorio s 91% y arteria hepatica accesoria 95%
cistico angulado 70%, pararelos 15% y esperiales 8% 2.5 a 4 cm
sick leave licencia por enfermedad
Feller et al(Sydney) ␣ 12.5% of 154 ␣ 16 non anastomotic, 4 anastomotic
segmento derecho al coledoco
radical derecho aberrante de implantacion baja
1) misidentification of the anatomy of the biliary tract as being the dominant factor in around 70% of the injuries and (2) technical errors leading to bleeding and subsequent clipping of the bile duct/artery or leading to bile leakage by inadequate clipping or traction and sub- sequent lateral wall injuries. Prevention of injuries is most important and different measurements have been advo- cated as for example the use of routine operative cholan- giographyn class I, class III, and some class IV injuries the mistake involved misidentifying the common duct (or right hepatic duct) for the cystic duct, followed by deliberate cutting of the misidentified duct. In the class II and some class IV injuries, the mistake consisted of performing the dissection in the triangle of Calot unintentionally too close to the bordering common hepatic or right hepatic duct. The ducts
Operative cholangiogram demonstrating narrowing of the common bile duct. The cholangiocatheter is located in the common duct rather than the cystic duct. This patient went on to have a class III injury.
were not seen because they were covered by connective tissue or inflammation. The underlying nature of the error in either case was misperception.
se piensa q el resto de las estructuras son adheerencia o accesorios
la percepcion de agarre y del espacio manipulacion de los objetos
haptic informacion vs pasiva
heuristic information informacion probabilitica baja para resolver problemas poco comun son de subconsciente
recipiente con dx de PSC
colangio de rutina no es concluyente si mejora el porcentaje de prevencio,... sin embargo la detectan mas
elective • Timeandcost • RarityofBDI • Willnotpreventallinjury • Needtobecorrectlyinterpreted
Slater, Strong et al (Queensland) 2001
Table 3. RULES OF THUMB TO HELP PREVENT BILE DUCT INJURIES
Optimize Imaging Use high-quality imaging equipment.
Initial Steps and Objectives Before starting the dissection, use the triangle of Calot for
orientation; find the cystic duct starting at the triangle. Pull the gallbladder infundibulum laterally to open the triangle of
Calot. Clear the medial wall of the gallbladder infundibulum. Make sure the cystic duct can be traced uninterrupted into the
base of the gallbladder. Open any subtle tissue plane between the gallbladder and
presumed cystic duct; the real cystic duct may be hidden in
there. Factors that Suggest One May Be Dissecting the Common Duct
Instead of Cystic Duct The duct when clipped is not fully encompassed by a standard M/L
clip (9 mm). Any duct that can be traced without interruption to course behind
the duodenum is probably the CBD. The presence of another unexpected ductal structure. A large artery behind the duct—the right hepatic artery runs
posterior to the CBD. Extra lymphatic and vascular structures encountered in the
dissection. The proximal hepatic ducts fail to opacify on operative
cholangiograms. Obtain Operative Cholangiograms Liberally
Whenever the anatomy is confusing When inflammation and adhesions result in a difficult dissection Whenever a biliary anomaly is suspected; assume that what
appears to be anomalous anatomy is really normal and confusing
until proved otherwise by cholangiograms. Avoid Unintended Injury to Ductal Structures
Only place clips on structures that are fully mobilized; the tip of a closed clip should not contain tissue.
The need for more than eight clips suggests the operation may be bloody enough to warrant conversion to an open procedure.
Consideration of a need for blood transfusion suggests the operation should be converted to an open procedure.
Open when inflammation or bleeding obscures the anatomy. Illusions
Compelling anatomic illusions to which everyone is susceptible are the primary cause of bile duct injuries; experience, knowledge, and technical skill by themselves are insufficient protection against this complication.
fter the laparoscopic era. The Bismuth-Corlette classi- fication was introduced before laparoscopy. It is difficult to apply in laparoscopic cholecystectomy as most of the technical factors and lesion mechanisms are completely different to open surgery. It considers the complete sec- tion of the common bile duct and the length of the proximal bile duct stump[10]. Nevertheless, most cases have late stenosis or bile duct obstruction which may be included in this classification, representing a subtype Strasberg E and Stewart-Way III-IV lesions.
is based on the most distal level at which healthy biliary mucosa is available for anastomosis during repair of a stricture or leak. This system was intended to help the surgeon choose the appropriate site for repair, and the degree of injury on this scale has been shown to correlate with outcomes after surgical repair
arteria cistica es la la arteria hepatica derecha
el cistico un luchka un ducto abaarrente
Tejido fibroso es ceerca de la hepatico comun
lifnagicos es la porta
Neverthe- less, the injury was discovered in only six (18%) of these patients. durante la conversion
gallbladder, 6 class I injuries when bile was seen to be leaking from the CBD, and 26 by operative identification of injured hepatic ducts. In the other 33 cases, the biliary anatomy was misinterpreted. In three class II injuries, the surgeon concluded that the bile duct injury had occurred because the gallbladder was connected directly to the CBD without an intervening cystic duct. In 30 cases, bile leakage (5 cases) and accessory ducts were reported.
3 dias despues de colecistectomia
Bile leak – Jaundice
– Peritonitis – Biliary fistula
todo esto hace un dx retardado
la tendencia es pensar que es el muñon cistico y sutural 30%sin colangiografia . solo el 4% se repara exitosamente, el 30% no se realiza, y el 67% no es exitoso.
colangiografia incompleta solo es exitos en 31% y 69% no es exitosoa. c
Colangiografia completa se lleva a 84% exitoso
E1-E3
65% de las lesiones
Sandha et al.4 created a grading system for post- cholecystectomy bile leaks diagnosed by ERCP. Low-grade leaks were described as identification of a leak after opacification of intrahepatic radicals and high grade as leakage that was detected before radical opacification. Low- grade leaks were treated with sphincterotomy alone, while high-grade leaks mandated biliary stenting, with resolutionoccurring in 91% of low-grade leaks and 100% of high-grade leaks. Sphincterotomy alone for the treatment of bile leaks has been found to be less effective than stenting it, but reduces the overall number of ERCPs.
hepatectomia colangitis a repeticion
10 12 fr sello no floter
72 H DRENAJE GRACIAS
lesiones combinadas arteria hepatica derecha 50% This injury is defined by a complete loss of common and/or hepatic bile duct continuity. Devascularization and loss of bile duct tissue obliges the surgeon to per- form a high-quality hepatojejunal anastomosis. The lat- ter procedure guarantees well-perfused bile ducts and a low tension anastomosis. The opposite is obtained when choledoco-choledoco or hepato-duodenum anastomosis are performed as devascularized ducts are used for the reconstruction and the duodenum tends to move down- wards, increasing anastomotic tension, even if a Kocher maneuver is performed well in advance[17].
The best postoperative outcomes are obtained when
the hepatic confluence is preserved, allowing a high-
quality, wide, well vascularized hepatojejunal anastomosis.
Partial resection of IV and V segments facilitates iden-
tification of bile ducts and proper settling of the jejunal loop[17,18].
In the unfortunate situation of inadequate ducts to perform a hepatojejunoanastomosis, the jejunal loop must be sutured to the liver parenchyma including feru- lized bile ducts within the anastomosis similarly to a Ka- zai portoenterostomy[19]. Most of these cases are consid- ered for liver transplant as postoperative outcomes after portoenterostomy are disappointing
la dilatacion ayuda a diferir o evitar una segunda cirugia hecha por n cirujano con experiencia
en cirujanos expertos es de 80 a 99% de exito y menos expertos 60 a 70%
3mmde via biliar la y no es buena
la termino-terminal no va a funcionar si el muñon proximal es mayor de 3cm
este tipo de circulacion contribuye a isquemia dle aparte proximalRepairing these injuries can be difficult due to the loss of substance on the artery and the deep inflammatory reaction on the stumps. It has been shown that this accident has no repercussion in terms of biliary reconstruction results if the repair was done by an experienced surgeon [11]. This is the reason why no routine angiographic study is done by most groups in the preoperative period. Nevertheless, the surgeon must keep in mind that after a right arterial injury and caudocephalic loss of the ductÕs arterial circulation (secondary to the ablation and loss of substance of the duct), the ducts are dependent on only the left hepatic artery. This is why we do high repairs to guarantee a good-quality, nonischemic, bilioenteric anastomosis as a routine.
60 porciento de arterias mayores y el 38% viene de laarteria hepatica deeraca
a
60% d exitos si se usa esto
19% de exito en sirs
9% usa tejido sin debridar
17% de exito el cirujano que lesiona y 94% con cirujano distinto- especialitsta
The opportunity to obtain a wide, non ischemic anas- tomosis at the hilar level began to restrict the usage of
stents. A wide anastomosis allows free flow of the pro- ducing low duct pressure and less opportunity of leak. It also minimizes the risk of stricture and the need of sub- sequent instrumentation. Nevertheless, some cases with loss of confluence and complete destruction of the iso- lated right and left hepatic duct need a portoenterostomy, with no probability of obtaining a wide, tension free non ischemic anastomosis that need ferulization of the ducts, they obtain long term patency.
No optimal period of waiting for performance of an elective repair has been established, but Strasberg advises a wait of 3 months. Resolution of bilomas, collections, and concomitant inflammation is expected after this period. Once the injury has reached its maxi- mum level of ischemia, the lesion is set to be stable. Elective surgical treatment then is recommended.
Quality of life and cost (in some countries) are an obstacle to the delayed biliary repair. For this reason, it should be reserved for patients with complex injuries in which systemic and local repercussion is noticed. Stras- berg et al. [13] have shown excellent results for complex injuries by delaying the surgery and using temporary stents for percutaneous drainage. The long-term results reported for their series are excellent.
Falta de recursos