2. The Aim
To find two statements p and not p
●
Either in the same document or in two different
–
documents.
The statements concern proteinprotein interactions
–
(PPIs).
“Protein A interacts with protein B.” Author X
–
“Protein A doesn't interact with protein B.” Author Y
–
3. Explicit vs. Implicit Contradictions
Explicit contradictions
●
The paper clearly states the contradiction
–
“Although the activation of X by Y would contradict
●
previous observations...”
Implicit contradictions
●
In two different articles or in different sentences of
–
the same article.
4. Implicit Contradiction
Example:
●
Doc1: C2ceramide has no effect on PI 3kinase in
–
NIH3T3 fibroblasts or 3T3L1 adipocytes.
Doc2: C2ceramide potently inhibits PI 3kinase
–
activation.
Just potential contradiction.
●
The rest is done by curators.
●
5. Explicit Contradictions
They are used to tune and test a system to
●
detect the implicit ones.
They happen near words expressing
●
contradiction and findings.
They most often occur in Discussion and rarely
●
in the Abstract. Other sections lie in between.
7. Explicit – Clue Words
There is an explicit contradiction when
●
There's a CONTRAST word;
–
There's a FINDING word;
–
There's a PPI.
–
8. Method to Find Explicit C
Rather vague definitions of dependency parse
●
and some other concept.
There may be an explicit CPPI in a sentence if
–
there is a direct path Γ of a maximum length of 3
between a finding word and a contradiction word,
and a path Φ of a maximum length of 10 between
the contradiction word and the cue word denoting
a PPI (affirmative or negative cases).
9. Example of XC
“Although the activation of AMPK by insulin
●
would contradict previous observations (28,29),
AMPK activation is known to accelerate glucose
uptake and utilization in the heart.”
10. Example of XC
file:///home/farzaneh/Desktop/Screenshot-1.png
11. Evaluation
Sentences from 500 JBC articles with
●
contradiction and finding words
Analyse manually and automatically
●
Results
●
True positives 22 Recall 36.07%
–
False positives 2 Precision 91.67%
–
False negatives 39 Fscore 51.76%
–
12. Evaluation
Causes of errors
●
Wrong parsing
–
PPI recognition
–
Missing PPI due to anaphoric problems
–
13. Method to Find Implicit C
Map the sentences to their meanings
●
These should map to the same meaning
–
ATP inhibition of adenosine monophosphateactivated
●
protein kinase.
Inhibition of ATP by AMPK.
●
ATP inhibits AMPK.
●
14. Method to Find Implicit C
Map the sentences to their “meaning”s
●
These should map to the same “meaning”
–
ATP inhibition of adenosine monophosphateactivated
●
protein kinase.
Inhibition of ATP by AMPK.
●
ATP inhibits AMPK.
●
15. Syntax – Semantic Map (Example)
Semantic class Inactivate
cue word inhibit
P1 ATP
P2 AMPK
Auxiliar molecule –
Polarity Positive
Direction of cue word Negative
Certainty –
Manner (of the cue word) Neutral
Organism –
Location –
16. The Method
Map the semantic representation (“meaning”) to a numeric
●
value
State of a PPI
–
Tables of
●
Cue word
–
Manner word
–
Polarity, degree, direction,...
–