this is a IOFHGJIWjrgio

1. EXEQUEST

2. DEMOGRAPHICS

3. 2653 RESPONDENTS
20% INTERNATIONAL
60% FEMALE
10% ST LUKES
10% CORNWALL
32.6% HUMANITIES
FAIR MIX OF COLLEGES
CAN BE CONSIDERED INCLUSIVE

4. OVERVIEW

5. 58% 41% 1%
POSITIVE DIFFERENCE NO DIFFERENCE NEGATIVE

6. Chart 11 Chart 10
7% 8% 6% 7%
20%
23%
28% 29%
34% 38%
2011 2010
Very Good Good Some Limited None
HOW IS THE GUILD RUN

7. Chart 12
5%2% 10% 4%3% 9%
36% 36%
48% 48%
2011 2010
Very Good Good Ok Bad Very Bad
INFLUENCE POSITIVE CHANGE

8. 73% 41%
REFRESH CAMPAIGN YGYMYC

9. 2 - 6% DECREASE IN
RATING OF SERVICES

10. 61% 80% 41%
VOLUNTEERING SOCIETIES CAMPAIGNS

11. Chart 17
1,900
1,425
950
475
0
E-mail Google search University website SMS Social networking site Youtube
METHODS OF COMMUNICATION

12. 70% 52% 38%
IMPORTANT HAVE SAY KNEW SOMEONE

13. 41% 30% 22%
DIDN’T KNOW CANDIDATES TOO BUSY DIDN’T CARE

14. Chart 20
50.000%
37.500%
25.000%
12.500%
0%
There are no barriers Unapproachable Do not need the Guild
WHAT STOPS ENGAGEMENT

15. “THROUGH THE GUILD THERE IS
A WIDE RANGE OF SOCIETIES
AND CLUBS TO GET INVOLVED
WITH”
KEY PERCEPTION OF THE GUILD AS AN ORGANISATION

16. PRIORITY AREAS

17. 28% 26% 15%
REPRESENTATION TO UNI SOCIAL SPACE COMMUNICATION

18. 27%
THINK THE GUILD IS PART
OF THE UNIVERSITY

19. UNENGAGED STUDENTS

20. FOCUS ON STUDENT LIFESTYLE

21. IMPROVE SERVICE OFFERED
BY COMMERCIAL SERVICES

22. REFOCUS CORE
MEMBERSHIP SERVICES

23. IMPROVE SERVICE OFFERED TO
STUDENT’S ON SATELLITE CAMPIS