2. ENUM Theory and Implementation
§ Operator Business Challenges
§ ENUM Overview
§ ENUM Sample Use Cases
§ How Does ENUM Work?
§ ENUM Architecture
§ Implementation Considerations
§ Implementation Approaches &
Worldwide Deployment Status
2
3. Challenges of Converged Services
on User Identification
§ Telephone numbers remain a key
identification mechanism for users to find
each other
§ With convergence, there are more ways to
identify a user – email address, URL, IM
buddy name
• Can a user reaching another user with a Telephone Number
for these converged services?
• How can an Operator find an IP route to the destination user
served by another Operator using a Telephone Number?
3
4. ENUM = Electronic Telephone Number
Mapping - Key to Deliver Converged Services
ENUM Internet domain
Directory name addresses
Domain Name Service (DNS)
Enabled Applications
• VoIP
E.164 Numbers: Internet • Unified messaging
One number • Instant messaging
mapped to many • IP fax
applications or
• Personal web pages
services
Telephony
Networks
4
5. What Is ENUM?
§ ENUM is one of the enablers of circuit-switched &
packet network convergence
§ Defined by Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
§ Translates an E.164 number into Internet domain names
§ ENUM is about new service creation
§ Allows use of telephone numbers in various communication media,
e.g., e-mail, VoIP
§ Can easily facilitate penetration of applications into mass market
§ Defines use of DNS resource records to find optional:
§ E-mail addresses
§ Voice over IP SIP / H.323 servers
§ Voice mail servers
§ Fax machines
5
6. ENUM - Sample Use Case
IP-IP Service Interconnection (e.g., VoIP)
TN A calls TN C
Softswitch DNS/
A ENUM
2
PSTN
3 IP
A 1
4
Softswitch
B
C TN = Telephone
Number
6
7. ENUM - Sample Use Case
IP-PSTN Service Interconnection
TN A calls TN D
Softswitch DNS/
A ENUM D
PSTN
IP
A
Softswitch
B
7
8. ENUM - Sample Use Case
PSTN-IP Service Interconnection
TN D calls TN A
Softswitch DNS/
A ENUM D
A
PSTN
IP
A
Softswitch
B
8
9. ENUM – Sample Use Case
WAP Application Access using Telephone Numbers
WAP = Wireless
Application Protocol
DNS/
1 ENUM
IP
WAP
2 WAP
Gateway 3 Application
Example: Verisign’s WebNum Trial
Delta Airlines 18002211212 www.delta-air.com/servlet/wireless
Northwest Airlines 18002252525 wireless.nwa.com
Charles Schwab 18775238434 pb.schwab.com
MSN Entertainment 18004269400 mobile.msn.com/hdml/sports.asp
E*Trade 1800ETRADE1 www.etrade.com
Ebay 14085587400 catalyst.2roam.com/www.ebay.com
9
10. ENUM – Sample Use Case
Directory Assistance for Other Identifiers Using
TN
1 2
DNS/
ENUM
4 IP 3
PSTN
10
11. How Does ENUM Work?
Simple ENUM Example
1) Takes a phone number +1 732 699 3264
2) Turns into a domain name 4.6.2.3.9.9.6.2.3.7.1.e164.arpa.
3) Ask the DNS
mailto:grichena@telcordia.com
4) Returns a list of URIs
sip:gary.richenaker@carrier.net
URI: Uniform Resource Identifier
11
12. How Does ENUM Work?
Simple ENUM Example
DNS Server
Response
Query sip:gary.richenaker@carrier.net
4.6.2.3.9.9.6.2.3.7.1.e164.arpa.
Call Setup
Dial sip:gary.richenaker@carrier.net
+17326993264
Gateway SIP Server
12
13. How to Implement ENUM?
Architectural Considerations
§ ITU & ISOC working on global-tree ENUM implementation
§ Why is a unique top-level domain used in ENUM?
§ I have phone number: +1 973 829 4305
§ I can choose between a.com and b.com
§ I select b.com and get the DNS domain
5.0.3.4.9.2.8.3.7.9.1.b.com.
§ If someone who only knows my phone number wants to contact me
how will he/she know I have my data in b.com & not a.com?
§ ITU/ISOC global-tree is a top rooted, global DNS ENUM
implementation
13
14. How to Implement ENUM?
Tiered Architecture Approach
Registry
Directs DNS query to country’s Tier-1 registry(ies).
Tier-0 NS record* provided for each Tier-1 registry
International-RIPE-NCC & ITU-TSB
CC 1 CC 44 National Directs DNS query to customer’s Tier-2
Registry Registry providers. NS record provided for each
Tier-1 Tier-1 subscriber’s telephone number
Stores list of service-specific internet addresses in of
Provider URI’s in a DNS resource record called NAPTR for each
Tier-2 subscriber. Returns the full list of Internet addresses
associated with the E.164 number being queried.
*An NS record is an authoritative name server DNS record used to delegate to subordinates
14
15. Sample ENUM Architecture
Root arpa, com, edu, org, net
International Tier 0 e164.arpa
National
Tier 1 1.e164.arpa (country code)
Registry
Registrars
1…n
Tier 2 4.6.2.3.9.2.8.3.7.9.1.e164.arpa
Registry NAPTR Record
users sip:gary.richenaker@sipes.se
mailto:grichena@telcordia.com
15
16. Tier 0 Public ENUM
Delegations as of October 1, 2007
1 NANP 40 Romania
66 Thailand
246 Diego Garcia 41 Switzerland
81 Japan
247 Ascension 420 Czech Republic
82 Korea
290 Saint Helena 421 Slovak Republic
84 Vietnam
30 Greece 423 Liechtenstein
86 China
31 Netherlands 43 Austria
971 UAE
33 France 44 UK
350 Gilbraltar 46 Sweden
878 10 VISIONng
353 Ireland 47 Norway
882 34 Global Networks
354 Iceland 48 Poland Switzerland AG
358 Finland 49 Germany French Territories
359 Bulgaria 55 Brazil 262, 508, 590, 594, 596
36 Hungary 61 Australia
374 Armenia 62 Indonesia
39 Italy 63 Philippines
65 Singapore
16
17. Sample Flow to Provision ENUM
Records
Domain Name System
Validation of
telephone ENUM Tier-1 pointers
to name servers w/
number X ENUM record for
telephone number X
Telephone
2 Number X
End-user 3 ENUM Tier-2
ENUM NAPTR record for
registrant Registrar Telephone Number X 5 Service Calling
1 application
4 Party
? 6
LDAP ENUM Record
database
if needed Protocol Service Address
SIP sip:grichenaker@telcordia.com
Legend: SMTP smtp:grichena@telcordia.com
Provisioning flow
TEL tel:+17326993264
steps 1, 2, 3
HTTP http://telcordia.com
Resolution flow
TEL tel:+18005551234
steps 4, 5, 6
17
18. ENUM Implementation
Considerations: Privacy
§ Registrant opt-in choice is central to ENUM operation
§ Optional participation in ENUM
§ Registrants choose exact information included in naming
authority pointer records (NAPTR) & preferences for how
information is used
§ Registrants choosing ENUM should choose how information
disclosed is used
§ Key for privacy protection is using personally
identifiable information only how it was intended
§ Do existing regulations protect privacy rights relative
to ENUM?
18
19. ENUM Implementation Approaches
and Worldwide Deployment Status
Three ENUM Implementation Approaches:
§ Public ENUM (End User ENUM)
§ Carrier ENUM (Infrastructure ENUM)
§ Private ENUM
19
20. Public ENUM
§ Also known as End User ENUM
§ Records entered by end users to associate
Telephone Numbers with the URIs of their
devices
§ Implementation architecture widely discussed
in standards bodies and industry forums
§ Key concerns on data availability, validity and
privacy
20
21. Public ENUM Status
Countries that have trialed Public ENUM
§ Austria § Netherlands
§ Finland § Poland
§ France § Sweden
§ Germany § South Korea
§ Ireland § Switzerland
§ Japan § UK
§ US
21
22. Public ENUM Observations
§ Based on the trials the following observations can be made
§ ENUM is viewed as a potential enabler for future services and
therefore has general regulatory support
§ Privacy and data security issues are viewed as critical
§ The approach towards validation/authentication varies widely,
from very secure to almost non-existent
§ The implementation approach and interface requirements also
vary widely
§ There is currently no killer application for the initial launch, but
there is a strong focus on VoIP
§ There are differing views on the importance and potential role of
incumbent telco
§ Regulatory issues are important but are not THE key factor in the
rollout of ENUM services
22
23. Making Public ENUM Actually Work
§ How will carriers and enterprises provision ENUM?
§ In order for ENUM to work, Carriers and Enterprises will
have to exchange data on their TN-to-URI translations
§ Carrier Customer Management Systems will have to learn
how to provision ENUM
§ What is the business model?
§ What will be the model for how much the Registrar, Tier 1,
and Tier 2 ENUM providers get paid?
§ What is the end user willingness to pay?
§ Will there be Regulatory policies relating to security
and privacy?
23
24. ENUM Implementation
Approaches
Party to Data TN-URI Deployment
control data Accessibility Mapping Status
End user (opt- Public Full end-user Country-wide trials
in) (ENUM DNS entries TN to end- e.g., CC1 ENUM
Public
may exist only if the user URI LLC, with limited
ENUM number assignee commercial
opts in)
offerings
Carrier/
Infra
ENUM
Private
ENUM
24
25. Carrier ENUM: Database in the Sky
Routes
Routes
SP1 creates SP2 creates
DNS records in DNS records in
Carrier ENUM 2 3 Carrier ENUM
DNS ENUM
Query
Routes
Routes
Routes
Routes
DNS ENUM 4
Query
Access 5
Administrator CSCF CSCF
1 Network
Administrator
6
SP1 SP2
SIP Invite
Local
Local Local
Local
Routes
Routes Routes
Routes
MGW
MGW
25
26. Status of Carrier ENUM
§ Requirements work on draft RFCs & other related
standards are still progressing
§ No trial using a Carrier/Infrastructure ENUM
approach
§ Not clear carriers or operators would place their
numbers & entry points to their network in publicly
accessible DNS tree
26
27. ENUM Implementation
Approaches
Party to Data TN-URI Deployment
control data Accessibility Mapping Status
End user (opt- Public Full end-user Country-wide trials
in) (ENUM DNS entries TN to end- e.g., CC1 ENUM
Public
may exist only if the user URI LLC, with limited
ENUM number assignee commercial
opts in)
offerings
Carrier/ Operator Public Full End User Still being defined
Infra TN - Operator by Industry
ENUM Gateway URI
(End user info
not disclosed)
Private
ENUM
27
28. Private ENUM
§ Private ENUM is one or more technologies (including
DNS) permitting service providers to exchange TN to
URI data privately & securely
§ Use any mutually agreed upon domain
§ Private ENUM is assumed authoritative for all endpoints
for which service providers choose to exchange data (no
need to opt out)
§ Private ENUM actually means private; data not
accessible via general Internet. Current uses include:
§ Wireless carriers for MMS SMS routing
§ Federations, e.g., X-Connect and Stealth
§ MSO interconnection (Cable Labs RFI)
28
29. Private ENUM: Federation
ENUM
Database
Carrier 1 Carrier 3
Carrier 2 Carrier 4
§ Carriers optimize VoIP sessions by routing directly
between carriers
§ Private, secure shared database within “Federation”
29
30. Service Interconnection Registry:
Example Private ENUM Implementation
LDC PSTN PSTN
PSTN Network Network
Network
STP STP
Service Provider
Service Provider Service
B
A
PSTN Interconnection PSTN
Gateways Registry Gateways
IP Network
IP Any
Network IP Network
SIP
SIP
Proxies
Proxies
IP Device Associates TNs or number blocks IP Device
with Internet addresses (URIs)
30
31. ENUM Implementation Approaches
Party to Data TN-URI Deployment
control data Accessibility Mapping Status
End user (opt- Public Full end-user Country-wide trials
in) (ENUM DNS TN to end-user e.g., CC1 ENUM
Public entries may exist URI LLC, with limited
ENUM only if the number commercial
assignee opts in)
offerings
Carrier/ Operator Public Full End User Still being defined
Infra TN - Operator by Industry
ENUM Gateway URI
(End user info
not disclosed)
Private Operator Authorized Full End User Deployed
ENUM Parties TN - Operator
Gateway URI
31
32. Reality: Multiple Registries Will Co-Exist
Registry SP3
Provider 1
Administrator
Registry
Registry
SP2
Registry SP4
Provider N
Registry
Registry
Administrator
SP1
Other SP
Other SP
SP1 Routing
Routing
SP1 Registry
Registry
Routing Data
Data
Routing
Data
Data
Administrator
Public SP5
ENUM
Registry
Registry
CSCF
End User
32
33. However, ENUM Does NOT Solve Address
All Service Interconnection Challenges…
§ ENUM is a protocol
§ Simple concept: use DNS to resolve address based on telephone
number
§ ENUM provides destination domain
§ BUT it does not address end-to-end service delivery issues
§ What QoS rules apply?
§ SLA with the terminating carrier?
§ What protocol/variations are used
§ SIP vs. H323
§ G711?
§ What route to take?
§ Least cost route?
§ Different rates depending on the carrier selected?
§ What security policy/keys are needed?
33
34. Summary
§ ENUM is here now – start planning how to deploy as
part of VoIP interconnection planning
§ Different flavors of ENUM will co-exist and inter-work,
but traditional carriers will likely gravitate to Carrier and
Private ENUM implementations
§ Key ENUM Success Requirements Include:
§ Carrier-grade, secure system
§ Standards Compliance (e.g., ENUM, SIP, etc.)
§ Interoperability with other registries
§ Portability, PSTN integration
§ Extensible to other IP services
§ IMS compatibility and interoperability
§ Select a solution architecture that is robust and flexible
enough to support your VoIP/IP services strategy
34
35. When I’m online,
I want text to my mobile to come up
in Messenger …
and I want to click to reply.
That’d be cool.
35
36. I want to purchase music from the television,
and send it to my mobile.
Or store on my music library..
36
37. When we’re watching a movie,we want to
see who is calling when the phone rings.
on the television.
37
38. Great goal!
I’ll send that as a message to my friends
38
40. I’m on the train.
I saw the score
Joe Gonzales
Joe Gonzales change?
732-699-5555
732-699-5555 Was it a good goal?
Are you watching
Are you watching
the game?
the game?
Joe, Hi,
I sure am watching the Joe, that was a great
match! goal, I’ll send it to
your cell phone
40
41. Pretty neat.
How’s our fantasy
team doing?
Replay
Replay
Live
Live
Let me check.
41
42. That’s great. See
you tomorrow at
our match. Bye.
Final StandingsTSN
R Manager
1 Team 1855
k
2 Bicycle kickers P
1775
Woodersen 0
3 Basso F.C. 1768
0
4 Ginas Guys 1728
0
5 MaxMOJO 1722
0
6 blind luck 1716
0
7 Valderrama 1716
0
8 Soccer10 1703
0
9 Crew Brew 1697
5
1 Richton Park 1695
0
1
0 Marshall Plan
Fire 1688
0
1 Section One 1684
0
1
2 Wazirds 1682
5
1
3 Etcheverry 1680
5
1
4 McBride 1677
0
1
5 Pele is here!!! 1675
0
6 0
With that goal, they
moved up one spot.
42
44. What will it take to achieve the
vision?
§ A Broadband, IP Infrastructure
§ Convergent Services and Customer Bundles
§ Good Marketing and Communications
§ Rapid Introduction of Innovative New Services
§ Network and Service Quality and Security
§ Cost Efficient Operation
§ Business Transformation to a Service-Centric
Operation and Customer-Centric Organization
44
45. The Market Wants . . EASE-OF-USE
.
AVAILABILITY
§ Transparent to Users
§ … of services
§ Same Services / Same User Experience
§ In-building
§ At home § Network-Resident User Profile –
§ On the road ensures seamless services across
devices
USER EXPERIENCE
AFFORDABILITY
§ Quality
§ Best Price / Performance (for
§ Consistency consumers)
§ Personalized § Best Cost / Performance (for operators)
INTERWORKING § Take Advantage of Embedded Home /
Enterprise Networks
§ Circuit - Packet
§ Hand-offs DISTRIBUTED . . .
§ Virtual Home Environment § Networks
§ Fast & Easy Authorization § Operations (ownership)
§ Flexible Charging / Billing § Services
§ Data
For the last 100 years it was all about the network …
Now it’s all about the Customer Experience enabled by the network.
45
46. Put All This Together and You Get
Converged Communications
Convergence means “Integration” & “Simplicity ”:
• Integrating Services: voice, data, video
• Integrating Networks: fixed, Fixed Wireless and mobile
• Unifying services across networks and enterprises
• Universal devices that are network-independent
The Power of Convergence:
• Convergence will allow operators to cross traditional boundaries and
leverage their entire business and infrastructure to gain an “unfair
advantage”.
• Convergence will reduce operational and capital expenditures
• Convergence allows sharing of service enablers and applications that will
open their networks and allow others to pay for and provide services that
will differentiate your business !
46
47. Data Points on Sample Services –
Growing Subscription on Converged
$190.0B
Services
$101.4M
$24.2B
$61.0B
$39.1M
$7.0B
2004 2009 2004 2008 2004 2009
Source: In-Stat 2005 Source: Gartner Group 2004-2005 Source: Strategy Analytics
2005
Worldwide Worldwide Worldwide
Push To Talk Users VoIP Services Revenues Mobile Data Revenues
More converged and bundled services are
being introduced and adopted…..
47
48. Fast Response to Market Requires Operators to
be Agile – Silo Approach No Longer Works
Past Future
Wireless Wireline
Voice Voice Video Data
Guides / Directories
Wireless/Wireline
Operator Services
Internet Access
Operator Virus
Operator
Services
Entertainment
CPE
Applications
Services Scanning
Video
Voice
Video
Directory
Directory
Guide Email
CPE CPE
Content Routing
Vertical Vertical IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS)
Features (Middle Layer)
Features
Transport Transport
Transport Internet Protocol (IP)
Transport
Broadband Connection
48
49. Impacts of VoIP and Converged
Services on Numbering
§ Emergence of VoIP and Converged Services
§ Impacts on Operator Infrastructure
§ Regulatory Implications
§ Impacts on Numbering and Number
Portability
§ Impacts on Interconnection
49
50. Further Impacts on Operator
Infrastructure • Security
• Service quality and QoS
• Mandated services (E911,
• Reliability
CALEA, LNP) Ser
ed Qu vice
• Traffic engineering
• Advanced service offerings
vanc and a • Customer experience
• Feature interactions Ad ices ns Su lity
rv io ppo
• Service integration and reuse Se eract rt
Int Call Agent
Databases
ent
oym e
th
Applications
Infr
• Scalability
OS ructu
Wide porting
• Work center of the future
ast
• Evolution
S/B
• Service fulfillment
Depl
IP IP
• Service assurance • CO consolidation
SS e
Sup
• Network traffic management • Backbone IP
r
• Training network planning
Interconnection
and
Interoperability
Testing and interoperability • Interconnection architecture
• Conformance testing • Addressing & routing
• Interoperable across technologies • Interconnection agreements
• Across supplier implementations • Billing and settlements
50
51. Converged Services Also Change the
Game on Regulatory Mandates
§ Emergency services – location information
§ Calling Line Identity presentation (and
restriction)
§ Legal interception
§ Number portability
§ Quality of Service
§ Carrier selection and pre-selection
§ Directory services
§ Tariff legal requirements
§ Net Neutrality
§ Emerging mandates on selected converged
services; IP TV
51
52. Other Regulatory Concerns On
VoIP
§ PC-to-PC VoIP services (e.g., basic Skype) are
generally not considered telecom services as no
national resources (numbers) are used
§ Regulators are more concerned with substitution of
traditional PSTN services like PC-to-Phone or
Phone-to-PC VoIP applications (e.g., Skype-Out and
Skype-In services, Vonage, Yahoo!BB, etc)
§ Regulators are looking at the economic and social
issues surrounding VoIP
§ In numerous countries incumbents have significant
influence over regulatory agency.
52
53. Impacts of Converged Services on
Numbering
§ Numbering should be technology neutral
§ Choice of number ranges interacts with
operators commercial objectives
§ Possible number ranges:
§ Geographic
§ Mobile
§ Personal
§ Corporate
§ New
§ Shared cost & premium rate services excluded
from formal discussion at this time
53
54. Converged Services and
Number Allocation
§ Numbering assignments for converged services
(e.g., VoIP)
§ Assess the implications of the choice of different
numbering schemes for interoperability and
interconnection between PSTN and IP networks
§ Understanding the legislative and regulatory
issues around VoIP and the implications for
number portability
§ Nomadicity as it relates to number portability
54
55. Impacts of Converged Services On
Interconnection
§ Converged Services mostly likely require end-to-end IP
transport to enable value-added features
§ Today, most IP-enabled services are routed over PSTN
when the session needs to be terminated in another
Operator’s network
§ Implications
§ Inability to deliver enhanced services
§ Use telephony settlement model which has evolved over a
century and has a much difficult structure and traffic pattern
§ The US has models based on interstate, intrastate, and local
§ The European model is more straightforward
§ Strong need for direct service interconnection over IP
55
56. The new “Peering Model” and the
Impact on Interconnection
Transit
LEC LEC
Provider
$ $ $ $
Termination Earnings Long Distance Costs Termination Costs
Routing
Registries
LEC LEC
Settlement Free or low Termination Cost $
56
57. IP Service Interconnection or
“Peering” Impacts
§ Traditional carriers are moving to VoIP and other
IP-enabled services to met competition and
customer demand
§ With IP service interconnection, carriers can more
efficiently interconnect an settle traffic directly
among themselves
§ Consequently, IP transport will drive the cost of transport
out of termination rates
§ Minute and distance sensitive pricing will give way
to port and signaling transport fees
57
58. How are IP Service Sessions Routed?
§ ENUM will become the global standard to enable IP service
interconnection
§ Address-of-record URI (Uniform Resource Identifier)
§ Identity for user
§ Address easily remembered.
§ Used in To and From headers of SIP messages.
§ Not associated with any endpoint.
§ Hostname is usually a domain.
§ e.g. sip:joe.bloggs@example.org (just like ‘mailto:user@host’)
§ Routed by DNS lookup on example.org
§ Contact address URI
§ A URI specific to a particular device rather than a user.
§ Hostname is an IP address, or refers to a particular device.
§ Appears in contact header & sometimes request-URI of SIP messages.
§ e.g. sip:joe.bloggs@192.168.3.6;transport=tcp
§ Routed to 192.168.3.6 directly
58
59. SIP-Based VoIP Example Other
Network
74.16.189.202
Gateway/
ENUM Border Controller
IP E.164 Routing
Network (e.g. ENUM)
- Converts E.164 to URI
Domain Name Service
(e.g. DNS)
Router - Converts URI/URL into IP
address
Inter-network IP Routing
68.38.159.98 (e.g. BGP, etc)
- Finds path between two IP
68.38.159.98 addresses in different
DNS networks
SIP Intra-network IP Routing
Proxies (e.g. OSPF, RIP, etc)
- Finds path between two IP
IP Device addresses in same sub-
sip:gary@telcordia.com => 74.16.189.202
network 68.38.176.213
4.6.2.3.9.9.6.2.3.7.e164.arpa => sip:gary@telcordia.com
IP Device
59
60. Example Implementation:
Service Interconnection Registry
LDC
LDC PSTN
PSTN
Network
PSTN Network
Network
STP STP
Operator A Service Operator B
PSTN Interconnection PSTN
Gateways Registry Gateways
IP Network
IP Network Any
IP Network
SIP SIP
Proxies Associates E.164 TNs with Internet Proxies
addresses (URIs) based on Operator-
IP Device defined business relationships IP Device
60
61. Impacts of Converged Services on
Number Portability
Since Converged Services will likely leverage
ENUM to use Telephone Numbers as the key
user identifier, what is the impact on Number
Portability?
§ Will ENUM replace portability?
§ Is ENUM the ultimate technical solution to
portability?
§ Does ENUM signify the end of portability?
61
62. Fixed Mobile Convergence and the
Future of Porting
§ Number Portability not an issue when numbering
plan does not distinguish between landline and
mobile telephone numbers
§ In countries where numbers are specially
allocated to distinguish the difference between
mobile and landline traffic does the FMC require:
§ Numbering Plans to be changed?
§ Tariffs restructured
§ Customer education
62
63. Number Portability Challenges in an IP
Environment
§ PSTN/TDM & IP networks will co-exist
§ Synchronization of ported information is required
§ Push vs. pull
§ Push – number portability database drives deletion of old
registration & creation of new registration
§ Pull - ported to carrier responsible for change in number
portability environment
§ In some countries no central number portability
database exists
63
64. Number Portability in a PSTN and IP
Environment – Sample Architecture
Number Portability Clearinghouse
IP Master
Reference Routing
Database Server Operator
Operator B
A PSTN
PSTN PSTN
PSTN Network Device
Network
Device
STP STP
PSTN
PSTN Gateway
Gateway
ENUM ENUM ENUM
Edge Master Edge
Server
ENUM/ VoIP/IP
VoIP/IP ENUM/
Edge Device
Device Edge
64
65. Summary
§ Converged services are here now
§ Regulators need to re-examine existing mandates in
face of these innovative services
§ Operators require a flexible infrastructure such as
IMS to quickly adapt to market conditions
§ Converged Services require IP interconnection
among Operators – calling for a new approach to
consider architecture implementation and settlement
model
§ Number portability is here to stay – implementation
will need to adapt to converged services needs
65