![CREDENTIALING PROGRAM IN ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/resnaatpcertificationfinal2009-120228135410-phpapp02/85/Resna-atp-certification-1-320.jpg)
![What is Credentialing? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Semelhante a Resna atp certification
Semelhante a Resna atp certification (20)
Último
Último (20)
Resna atp certification
- 4. CERTIFICATION Process by which a non-governmental agency or association validates an individual’s qualifications and knowledge in a defined functional or clinical area
Notas do Editor
- Licensure always trumps certification
- Connotation of trust – to consumer, to employer, funding source, referrals, etc.
- Talk about history a bit – 30 years old org, etc.
- Practice in all areas of AT practice in various settings - research, academics, service delivery For internationalization – add relationships with other sister orgs
- Add the history – why and how of consolidation
- This equipment may include manual and power wheelchairs, alternate computer access, augmentative and alternative communication devices, and other technology to improve the function and quality of life for an individual with a disability *REWORK this definition*** This equipment may include manual and power wheelchairs, alternate computer access, augmentative and alternative communication devices, and other technology to improve the function and quality of life for an individual with a disability This equipment may include manual and power wheelchairs, alternate computer access, augmentative and alternative communication devices, and other technology to improve the function and quality of life for an individual with a disability This equipment may include manual and power wheelchairs, alternate computer access, augmentative and alternative communication devices, and other technology to improve the function and quality of life for an individual with a disability
- Direct Communication (i.e. greeting the consumer and caregivers) Written Communication (i.e. documentation) Advertising/Marketing (i.e. business cards, letterhead etc…)
- While many payers currently do not require the ATP to perform these functions in order to adhere to the RESNA Standards of Practice it is imperative as part of a best practices model for service delivery in any setting and with regard to any assistive technology recommendation. It is acceptable for the ATP to delegate some of these functions to another skilled/competent individual; however, if the ATP is receiving remuneration for the product and/or services rendered they are responsible for the task. It is also imperative for the ATP to document what was tried and failed as well as what was considered and ruled out during this process.
- Direct assessment may include teleconferencing or a face-to-face encounter; however, it is unlikely that a phone interview or questionnaire alone will provide sufficient information necessary to make an equipment recommendation.
- It is imperative for the ATP to use their skilled professional judgment when making equipment recommendations and NOT be caught up by what is a covered benefit or what will be paid for. The ATP must explain WHY they are making the particular recommendation, as well as the pros and cons related to the recommendation so that the consumer can make an informed choice as to how THEY want to spend their financial resources.
- When considering an AT recommendation the ATP must consider current need; however it is also essential for the ATP to understand a consumer’s diagnoses, prognosis and any contributing co-morbid conditions that may affect their future AT needs. Aging with a disability is just as important to consider as the consumer’s risk for secondary medical complications or anticipated change with a progressive condition. When, where and how the AT will be used must also be taken into consideration as the recommendation may be appropriate for one environmental setting but inappropriate for another. Remember: “over prescription” is as inappropriate as “under prescription”
- An ATP uses their skilled professional judgment to make AT equipment recommendations based on the features and benefits of the recommended item(s) and allows the consumer to make the financial decision as to how they want to proceed. It is the ATP’s responsibility to document the consumer’s decision relative to the AT technology recommendations they will proceed with, any AT technology recommendations they may add at a later date and any AT recommendations they elect not to pursue.
- Remember: If it isn’t documented it didn’t happen!
- The ATP must disclose all financial ties to the provision of AT products and services so that the consumer and public at large are aware of any potential conflict of interest.
- Increased access via CBT
- Re-validated every 5-7 years, update practice analysis, regularly update items – overseen regularly
- List the content – areas of AT practice
- Assistive Technology encompasses ANY enabling intervention from the very “low tech” curly cue shoe laces, canes, card holders and picture boards to very “high tech” wheelchairs, speech generating devices and brain interface computer access- and everything in between.
- Pending - The waiting period between the time the applicant signs and dates the application to sit for the exam until the time the individual is notified that he or she has passed the exam. During this time all individuals must be in good standing with the PSB and abide by the RESNA Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics. Active - The two year period following successful completion of the exam or recertification requirements. Inactive - This may be voluntary, on or before the recertification date with no time line required for reactivation or involuntary at the recommendation of the Complaint Panel and/or Appeal Panel or due to recertification requirements not being met prior to the recertification deadline. Probation, Suspension or Revocation - As a result of a sanction imposed by the CRC for a violation of the RESNA Standards of Practice or Code of Ethics. The length and terms of probation will be in accordance with the recommendation of the Complaint Panel and/or the Appeal Panel. A certificate that has been revoked may not be reinstated. Ineligible - An individual will be barred from becoming certified or recertified either indefinitely or for a specified duration in accordance with the Recertification Guidelines, the Reinstatement Guidelines and/or in accordance with the recommendation of the Complaint Panel and/or the Appeal Panel.
- Recertification requires that all five recertification requirements be met and that the individual is in good standing with the Professional Standards Board (PSB). The requirements are as follows: - The financial obligation to the RESNA certification program is paid in full. - The individual has submitted a signed and dated attestation statement to abide by the RESNA Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics - The individual has submitted documentation to verify the continuing education requirement is met. - The individual has submitted documentation to verify the work experience requirement is met. - The individual has updated or confirmed his or her employment contact information with RESNA. Update - Access to CEUs – what counts, in-person or online
- Reactivation following a voluntary inactivation The individual may chose one of the following options to be considered for reactivation: Satisfy recertification requirements as follows: Pay the recertification fee required. Submit a signed and dated attestation statement to abide by the Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics. Submit .25 continuing education units, or their equivalent, for each 90 days on inactive status. Pay a reactivation fee of $25.00; or Retake and pass the certification exam. Reactivation following a private or public letter of concern The individual must comply with any and all reactivation requirements outlined in the private or public notification of concern from the Complains Panel and/or Appeals Panel. Reactivation following a Recertification Violation The individual must comply with any and all reactivation requirements outlined in the private or public notification of concern and in compliance with the recertification requirement for the category of recertification violation. Reactivation following Suspension The individual must comply with any and all requirements outlined in the suspension notice. Reinstatement fee up to $1000
- The RESNA Professional Standards Board (PSB) has a separate Complaints Review Committee (CRC) responsible for processing and adjudicating complaints submitted against RESNA Certificants who may be in violation of the Standards of Practice or Code of Ethics. The CRC thoroughly investigates each complaint and conducts monthly meetings, via teleconference to discuss and adjudicate each complaint in a timely manner. The complaint may come from anyone with first-hand knowledge of a potential violation. To file a complaint the complainant should download, complete and submit the Complaint Form with any supporting documentation available. Complaints may not be anonymous so that the CRC is able to conduct their investigation during the adjudication process. Also, action cannot be taken by the CRC until any legal proceedings are completed. It is vital that certificants and others report any alleged violations, misrepresentations or misconduct so that the PSB can take the steps necessary to protect the public and the value of the certification.
- Beef this one up
- Add states requiring certification in some for
- Why is technology abandoned? List reasons here What is meant by quality outcome? What is technology abandonment