SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 3
EMPLOYEE value proposition/branding focus groups: 2007
During August and September 2007, Recruitment and Retention Innovations
team members conducted four focus groups: two in Raleigh, one in Greenville
and one in Greensboro, to discuss a statewide Employee Value Proposition
(EVP) and Branding. These focus groups were part of The Office of State
Personnel’s HR Performance Solutions initiative, a comprehensive program
designed to build and sustain a performance culture among its workforce.
Agencies and universities were asked to send participants using this suggestion:

Identify four employees in your agency or university who can participate in the
focus groups using the following guidelines:

   •   Top performers
   •   Length of service as follows:
              o Two new hires
              o Two employees with five or more years experience in state government
   •   One employee from each category
              o Manager/Supervisor
              o Professional/Technical
              o Paraprofessional/Office Support/Skilled Craft
              o Service/Maintenance


PARTICIPANTS
Participants totaled 97 employees representing 17 agencies and 9 universities.
Agencies represented multiple regions by sending to multiple focus groups.
Experience levels as state employees ranged from less than two weeks to thirty
years and one day. Anecdotally, there were many participants with 15 - 20 +
years of state government experience. Members of the Baby Boomer,
Generation X, Generation Y, and possibly a couple of Traditionalists seemed to
be present. Participants earnestly participated in the discussion, offering creative
input and expressing enthusiasm about state employment. The employee with
30 years and one day of state government service proudly declared, “I could
have retired yesterday, but I am sticking around because of job-interest
alignment.” Some employees gathered information from colleagues prior to the



Page 1 of 3                                                                  2/28/08
focus group. Another participant contributed research about recruiting and
retaining the emerging generation.

Participant totals:
                      8/27/2007   8/28/2007       9/19/2007       9/20/2007
                       Raleigh     Raleigh        Greenville     Greensboro
 Participants            32          29              17               19


Job titles and roles were diverse. Participants included administrative,
processing, executive and student services assistants; a Security Officer, an SBI
agent, a Special Deputy Attorney General, a Facility Maintenance Supervisor, a
Division Director of Structural Pest Control, and Managers of Store Supply,
Library Stacks, Research Operations, and Building and Environmental Service.
Additional job roles were: Carpenter, Administrative Officers, Construction
Engineer, Transportation Engineer, Maintenance Mechanic III, Housekeeper,
Environmental Program Supervisor, Administrative Secretary, Landscape
Architect, Marine and Shipyard Superintendent, Staff Development Specialist,
Facility Electrical Engineer, Facility Maintenance Engineer, Facility Maintenance
Supervisor, IT Director, Business and Technology Applications Specialist,
Forestry Supervisor, Technology Support Analyst, Technology Support
Specialist, Executive Assistant, Assistant State Librarian, Personnel Analyst,
Personnel Technician, Personnel Supervisor, Information and Communications
Division Director, Education Program Director III and a CIO.

METHOD
The focus groups began with PowerPoint guided reviews of EVP and branding.
Participants individually ranked from most to least important the top ten attributes
that attracted them to and kept them working in state government. The attribute
choices provided were based on Corporate Leadership Council (CLC) research.
Definitions of the attributes were provided for clarity. Working in groups of 5 or
6, guided by a facilitator, each group reached consensus about the top 3
attraction and top 3 retention attributes for their group. These top 3 attraction
and retention attributes became the basis for each group’s development of EVP
messages. A list of tag lines was distributed to inspire conversation. Next, each
group created their own taglines.

OUTCOMES
Job-interest alignment, benefits, (including retirement), work-life balance, career
development, future opportunities, organizational stability and manager quality
were discussed as primary attraction and retention attributes most valued by the
participants. Compensation (total compensation; not wages alone) and Job-
interest alignment were identified as consensus top one or top two attraction



Page 2 of 3                                                                  2/28/08
attributes at all four meetings.   Job-Interest alignment was identified as
consensus number one retention attribute at each focus group session. Other
consensus standouts for retention were development opportunities and future
career opportunities. Perhaps the most significant outcome of the focus groups
was an extensive list of recommended taglines tied to the State’s EVP.




www.performanceSolutions.nc.gov/staffingInitiatives/recruitment/EmploymentMarketing/Employm
entMarketing_Branding_2007ProjectSummaryReport.pdf



Page 3 of 3                                                                         2/28/08

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a Employment marketing branding_2007projectsummaryreport

Workplace and Workforce task force2009-eng
Workplace and Workforce task force2009-engWorkplace and Workforce task force2009-eng
Workplace and Workforce task force2009-engIrene Serry
 
Employees’ Career Growth and Development: Outlook and Challenges of a First-C...
Employees’ Career Growth and Development: Outlook and Challenges of a First-C...Employees’ Career Growth and Development: Outlook and Challenges of a First-C...
Employees’ Career Growth and Development: Outlook and Challenges of a First-C...AI Publications
 
DWRevsited_Final_ScreenResSINGLES (1)
DWRevsited_Final_ScreenResSINGLES (1)DWRevsited_Final_ScreenResSINGLES (1)
DWRevsited_Final_ScreenResSINGLES (1)Matt Corkery
 
BUS 303 Diversity and Leveraging Difference WorksheetCreate a WO
BUS 303 Diversity and Leveraging Difference WorksheetCreate a WOBUS 303 Diversity and Leveraging Difference WorksheetCreate a WO
BUS 303 Diversity and Leveraging Difference WorksheetCreate a WOChereCoble417
 
Physical Security Threats Case Study This case study builds upon y.docx
Physical Security Threats Case Study This case study builds upon y.docxPhysical Security Threats Case Study This case study builds upon y.docx
Physical Security Threats Case Study This case study builds upon y.docxkarlhennesey
 
Yvette R. Smith Resume ver 5
Yvette R. Smith Resume ver 5Yvette R. Smith Resume ver 5
Yvette R. Smith Resume ver 5Yvette Smith
 
Honorhealth Case Study
Honorhealth Case StudyHonorhealth Case Study
Honorhealth Case StudySonia Sanchez
 
TCE-Diversity-Audit-2013
TCE-Diversity-Audit-2013TCE-Diversity-Audit-2013
TCE-Diversity-Audit-2013Lydia Nash
 
The Resume of Liane H. Gould - Workforce Development Executive
The Resume of Liane H. Gould - Workforce Development ExecutiveThe Resume of Liane H. Gould - Workforce Development Executive
The Resume of Liane H. Gould - Workforce Development ExecutiveArlington County Employment Center
 
Running head Week 8 Assignment 2 International Assignments.docx
Running head Week 8 Assignment 2 International Assignments.docxRunning head Week 8 Assignment 2 International Assignments.docx
Running head Week 8 Assignment 2 International Assignments.docxagnesdcarey33086
 
Break Through to Diversity
Break Through to DiversityBreak Through to Diversity
Break Through to DiversityErin Stehlik
 
A Comparative Case Study Of Appreciative Inquiries In One Organization Impli...
A Comparative Case Study Of Appreciative Inquiries In One Organization  Impli...A Comparative Case Study Of Appreciative Inquiries In One Organization  Impli...
A Comparative Case Study Of Appreciative Inquiries In One Organization Impli...Becky Gilbert
 
New 1 introduction to a former federal it auditor
New 1   introduction to a former federal it auditorNew 1   introduction to a former federal it auditor
New 1 introduction to a former federal it auditorAlinaJohnson6
 
WIOA CONFERENCE AGENDA-Work Group Discussion Docs
WIOA CONFERENCE AGENDA-Work Group Discussion DocsWIOA CONFERENCE AGENDA-Work Group Discussion Docs
WIOA CONFERENCE AGENDA-Work Group Discussion DocsJanet Dunigan
 
Transformation of the Workforce Investment System
Transformation of the Workforce Investment SystemTransformation of the Workforce Investment System
Transformation of the Workforce Investment Systemcamaratas
 

Semelhante a Employment marketing branding_2007projectsummaryreport (20)

Workplace and Workforce task force2009-eng
Workplace and Workforce task force2009-engWorkplace and Workforce task force2009-eng
Workplace and Workforce task force2009-eng
 
Employees’ Career Growth and Development: Outlook and Challenges of a First-C...
Employees’ Career Growth and Development: Outlook and Challenges of a First-C...Employees’ Career Growth and Development: Outlook and Challenges of a First-C...
Employees’ Career Growth and Development: Outlook and Challenges of a First-C...
 
DWRevsited_Final_ScreenResSINGLES (1)
DWRevsited_Final_ScreenResSINGLES (1)DWRevsited_Final_ScreenResSINGLES (1)
DWRevsited_Final_ScreenResSINGLES (1)
 
BUS 303 Diversity and Leveraging Difference WorksheetCreate a WO
BUS 303 Diversity and Leveraging Difference WorksheetCreate a WOBUS 303 Diversity and Leveraging Difference WorksheetCreate a WO
BUS 303 Diversity and Leveraging Difference WorksheetCreate a WO
 
Physical Security Threats Case Study This case study builds upon y.docx
Physical Security Threats Case Study This case study builds upon y.docxPhysical Security Threats Case Study This case study builds upon y.docx
Physical Security Threats Case Study This case study builds upon y.docx
 
Yvette R. Smith Resume ver 5
Yvette R. Smith Resume ver 5Yvette R. Smith Resume ver 5
Yvette R. Smith Resume ver 5
 
Honorhealth Case Study
Honorhealth Case StudyHonorhealth Case Study
Honorhealth Case Study
 
TCE-Diversity-Audit-2013
TCE-Diversity-Audit-2013TCE-Diversity-Audit-2013
TCE-Diversity-Audit-2013
 
The Resume of Liane H. Gould - Workforce Development Executive
The Resume of Liane H. Gould - Workforce Development ExecutiveThe Resume of Liane H. Gould - Workforce Development Executive
The Resume of Liane H. Gould - Workforce Development Executive
 
Running head Week 8 Assignment 2 International Assignments.docx
Running head Week 8 Assignment 2 International Assignments.docxRunning head Week 8 Assignment 2 International Assignments.docx
Running head Week 8 Assignment 2 International Assignments.docx
 
The Resume of Liane H Gould
The Resume of Liane H GouldThe Resume of Liane H Gould
The Resume of Liane H Gould
 
The resume of liane gould
The resume of liane gouldThe resume of liane gould
The resume of liane gould
 
Redi roadmap
Redi roadmapRedi roadmap
Redi roadmap
 
Proposal
ProposalProposal
Proposal
 
Break Through to Diversity
Break Through to DiversityBreak Through to Diversity
Break Through to Diversity
 
Hrny May 2004
Hrny May 2004Hrny May 2004
Hrny May 2004
 
A Comparative Case Study Of Appreciative Inquiries In One Organization Impli...
A Comparative Case Study Of Appreciative Inquiries In One Organization  Impli...A Comparative Case Study Of Appreciative Inquiries In One Organization  Impli...
A Comparative Case Study Of Appreciative Inquiries In One Organization Impli...
 
New 1 introduction to a former federal it auditor
New 1   introduction to a former federal it auditorNew 1   introduction to a former federal it auditor
New 1 introduction to a former federal it auditor
 
WIOA CONFERENCE AGENDA-Work Group Discussion Docs
WIOA CONFERENCE AGENDA-Work Group Discussion DocsWIOA CONFERENCE AGENDA-Work Group Discussion Docs
WIOA CONFERENCE AGENDA-Work Group Discussion Docs
 
Transformation of the Workforce Investment System
Transformation of the Workforce Investment SystemTransformation of the Workforce Investment System
Transformation of the Workforce Investment System
 

Mais de IDEE JSC

Vietnam market size
Vietnam market sizeVietnam market size
Vietnam market sizeIDEE JSC
 
Vietnam 201105
Vietnam 201105Vietnam 201105
Vietnam 201105IDEE JSC
 
Tmca conceptualizing and_researching_employer_branding
Tmca conceptualizing and_researching_employer_brandingTmca conceptualizing and_researching_employer_branding
Tmca conceptualizing and_researching_employer_brandingIDEE JSC
 
Southwest employee branding
Southwest employee brandingSouthwest employee branding
Southwest employee brandingIDEE JSC
 
Internalbranding
InternalbrandingInternalbranding
InternalbrandingIDEE JSC
 
Iabc employee engagementreport2010final
Iabc employee engagementreport2010finalIabc employee engagementreport2010final
Iabc employee engagementreport2010finalIDEE JSC
 
Global local branding
Global local brandingGlobal local branding
Global local brandingIDEE JSC
 
Erm brochure emplyer_branding
Erm brochure emplyer_brandingErm brochure emplyer_branding
Erm brochure emplyer_brandingIDEE JSC
 
Employer branding in_the_e-world
Employer branding in_the_e-worldEmployer branding in_the_e-world
Employer branding in_the_e-worldIDEE JSC
 
Cause branding ls_apresentation042308
Cause branding ls_apresentation042308Cause branding ls_apresentation042308
Cause branding ls_apresentation042308IDEE JSC
 
Catalog new
Catalog newCatalog new
Catalog newIDEE JSC
 
Branding08
Branding08Branding08
Branding08IDEE JSC
 
Branding labour intensive_services
Branding labour intensive_servicesBranding labour intensive_services
Branding labour intensive_servicesIDEE JSC
 
Branding (1)
Branding (1)Branding (1)
Branding (1)IDEE JSC
 
09 0700 workplace panel trends-symp_final upd
09 0700 workplace panel trends-symp_final upd09 0700 workplace panel trends-symp_final upd
09 0700 workplace panel trends-symp_final updIDEE JSC
 

Mais de IDEE JSC (20)

Vietnam market size
Vietnam market sizeVietnam market size
Vietnam market size
 
Vietnam 201105
Vietnam 201105Vietnam 201105
Vietnam 201105
 
Vnmbfr
VnmbfrVnmbfr
Vnmbfr
 
Tmca conceptualizing and_researching_employer_branding
Tmca conceptualizing and_researching_employer_brandingTmca conceptualizing and_researching_employer_branding
Tmca conceptualizing and_researching_employer_branding
 
Southwest employee branding
Southwest employee brandingSouthwest employee branding
Southwest employee branding
 
Shrm
ShrmShrm
Shrm
 
Kit
KitKit
Kit
 
Internalbranding
InternalbrandingInternalbranding
Internalbranding
 
Iabc employee engagementreport2010final
Iabc employee engagementreport2010finalIabc employee engagementreport2010final
Iabc employee engagementreport2010final
 
Global local branding
Global local brandingGlobal local branding
Global local branding
 
Erm brochure emplyer_branding
Erm brochure emplyer_brandingErm brochure emplyer_branding
Erm brochure emplyer_branding
 
Employer branding in_the_e-world
Employer branding in_the_e-worldEmployer branding in_the_e-world
Employer branding in_the_e-world
 
Cci dfs
Cci dfsCci dfs
Cci dfs
 
Cause branding ls_apresentation042308
Cause branding ls_apresentation042308Cause branding ls_apresentation042308
Cause branding ls_apresentation042308
 
Catalog new
Catalog newCatalog new
Catalog new
 
Branding08
Branding08Branding08
Branding08
 
Branding labour intensive_services
Branding labour intensive_servicesBranding labour intensive_services
Branding labour intensive_services
 
Branding
BrandingBranding
Branding
 
Branding (1)
Branding (1)Branding (1)
Branding (1)
 
09 0700 workplace panel trends-symp_final upd
09 0700 workplace panel trends-symp_final upd09 0700 workplace panel trends-symp_final upd
09 0700 workplace panel trends-symp_final upd
 

Employment marketing branding_2007projectsummaryreport

  • 1. EMPLOYEE value proposition/branding focus groups: 2007 During August and September 2007, Recruitment and Retention Innovations team members conducted four focus groups: two in Raleigh, one in Greenville and one in Greensboro, to discuss a statewide Employee Value Proposition (EVP) and Branding. These focus groups were part of The Office of State Personnel’s HR Performance Solutions initiative, a comprehensive program designed to build and sustain a performance culture among its workforce. Agencies and universities were asked to send participants using this suggestion: Identify four employees in your agency or university who can participate in the focus groups using the following guidelines: • Top performers • Length of service as follows: o Two new hires o Two employees with five or more years experience in state government • One employee from each category o Manager/Supervisor o Professional/Technical o Paraprofessional/Office Support/Skilled Craft o Service/Maintenance PARTICIPANTS Participants totaled 97 employees representing 17 agencies and 9 universities. Agencies represented multiple regions by sending to multiple focus groups. Experience levels as state employees ranged from less than two weeks to thirty years and one day. Anecdotally, there were many participants with 15 - 20 + years of state government experience. Members of the Baby Boomer, Generation X, Generation Y, and possibly a couple of Traditionalists seemed to be present. Participants earnestly participated in the discussion, offering creative input and expressing enthusiasm about state employment. The employee with 30 years and one day of state government service proudly declared, “I could have retired yesterday, but I am sticking around because of job-interest alignment.” Some employees gathered information from colleagues prior to the Page 1 of 3 2/28/08
  • 2. focus group. Another participant contributed research about recruiting and retaining the emerging generation. Participant totals: 8/27/2007 8/28/2007 9/19/2007 9/20/2007 Raleigh Raleigh Greenville Greensboro Participants 32 29 17 19 Job titles and roles were diverse. Participants included administrative, processing, executive and student services assistants; a Security Officer, an SBI agent, a Special Deputy Attorney General, a Facility Maintenance Supervisor, a Division Director of Structural Pest Control, and Managers of Store Supply, Library Stacks, Research Operations, and Building and Environmental Service. Additional job roles were: Carpenter, Administrative Officers, Construction Engineer, Transportation Engineer, Maintenance Mechanic III, Housekeeper, Environmental Program Supervisor, Administrative Secretary, Landscape Architect, Marine and Shipyard Superintendent, Staff Development Specialist, Facility Electrical Engineer, Facility Maintenance Engineer, Facility Maintenance Supervisor, IT Director, Business and Technology Applications Specialist, Forestry Supervisor, Technology Support Analyst, Technology Support Specialist, Executive Assistant, Assistant State Librarian, Personnel Analyst, Personnel Technician, Personnel Supervisor, Information and Communications Division Director, Education Program Director III and a CIO. METHOD The focus groups began with PowerPoint guided reviews of EVP and branding. Participants individually ranked from most to least important the top ten attributes that attracted them to and kept them working in state government. The attribute choices provided were based on Corporate Leadership Council (CLC) research. Definitions of the attributes were provided for clarity. Working in groups of 5 or 6, guided by a facilitator, each group reached consensus about the top 3 attraction and top 3 retention attributes for their group. These top 3 attraction and retention attributes became the basis for each group’s development of EVP messages. A list of tag lines was distributed to inspire conversation. Next, each group created their own taglines. OUTCOMES Job-interest alignment, benefits, (including retirement), work-life balance, career development, future opportunities, organizational stability and manager quality were discussed as primary attraction and retention attributes most valued by the participants. Compensation (total compensation; not wages alone) and Job- interest alignment were identified as consensus top one or top two attraction Page 2 of 3 2/28/08
  • 3. attributes at all four meetings. Job-Interest alignment was identified as consensus number one retention attribute at each focus group session. Other consensus standouts for retention were development opportunities and future career opportunities. Perhaps the most significant outcome of the focus groups was an extensive list of recommended taglines tied to the State’s EVP. www.performanceSolutions.nc.gov/staffingInitiatives/recruitment/EmploymentMarketing/Employm entMarketing_Branding_2007ProjectSummaryReport.pdf Page 3 of 3 2/28/08