SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 150
The   Mexican American Civil
       Rights Movement
The   Chicano   Movement
The   Chicano   Movement
El   Movimiento
The Other Struggle For Equal Schools:
Mexican Americans During the Civil Rights
               Movement
The Other Struggle For Equal Schools:
Mexican Americans During the Civil Rights
               Movement
                                   Rubén Donato




                                   Presentation By
                                   Ellison Williams
                                  Melissa Rodriguez
                                    Amanda Tanti
                                   Vincent Narcia
                                    David Aponte
The Evolution of the Mexican
   American Community
The Evolution of the Mexican
   American Community
Mexican-American War (1846-1848)

  ‣   Mexico lost the war and half of its territory

  ‣   Approx. 6000 Mexicans had to move or become U.S. citizens
The Evolution of the Mexican
   American Community
Mexican-American War (1846-1848)

  ‣   Mexico lost the war and half of its territory

  ‣   Approx. 6000 Mexicans had to move or become U.S. citizens

California

  ‣   Mexico lost half its territory

  ‣   Approx. 6000 Mexicans had to move or become U.S. citizens
The Evolution of the Mexican
   American Community
Mexican-American War (1846-1848)

  ‣   Mexico lost the war and half of its territory

  ‣   Approx. 6000 Mexicans had to move or become U.S. citizens

California

  ‣   Mexico lost half its territory

  ‣   Approx. 6000 Mexicans had to move or become U.S. citizens

GOLD!

  ‣   1850 brought an influx of white settlers and made Mexicans a minority
      group. Gold depleted miners turned to farming and squatting.

  ‣   Encroached onto properties with rent and good faith payments.
The Evolution of the Mexican
   American Community
The Evolution of the Mexican
   American Community
 ‣   Settlers started to acquire positions in government and challenge land
     ownership of Mexican Americans/Californios
The Evolution of the Mexican
   American Community
  ‣   Settlers started to acquire positions in government and challenge land
      ownership of Mexican Americans/Californios

Land Act of 1851

  ‣   Called for land titles, which Mexicans did not have.

  ‣   Mexicans/Californios could not afford legal fees to fight for land.

  ‣   When legal matters would not take their land, armed squatters or lynchers
      would force them off their property.
The Evolution of the Mexican
   American Community
  ‣   Settlers started to acquire positions in government and challenge land
      ownership of Mexican Americans/Californios

Land Act of 1851

  ‣   Called for land titles, which Mexicans did not have.

  ‣   Mexicans/Californios could not afford legal fees to fight for land.

  ‣   When legal matters would not take their land, armed squatters or lynchers
      would force them off their property.

White settlers thought that the amount of land that Mexicans owned was
outrageous.

  ‣   It was impossible for the Mexicans to defend their property.
Northward Tide
Northward Tide
Immigrating Mexicans made up labor force.

 ‣   Even former middle class was forced to become unskilled or
     semiskilled laborers.

 ‣   Caused tensions with Americans due to employers hiring
     Mexicans for cheap labor.
Northward Tide
Immigrating Mexicans made up labor force.

 ‣   Even former middle class was forced to become unskilled or
     semiskilled laborers.

 ‣   Caused tensions with Americans due to employers hiring
     Mexicans for cheap labor.

Bracero Program

 ‣   US/Mexico deal in 1942 for temporary contracted labor.

 ‣   It ended up lasting for over 20 years.

 ‣   1946-1960, an average of 278, 800 Mexican Bracero were
     brought in each year
Brownfield, California
Brownfield, California
Tried to keep Mexican laborers out to
maintain higher wages for white laborers.
Brownfield, California
Tried to keep Mexican laborers out to
maintain higher wages for white laborers.

However, Mexican laborers became
necessary for the town’s economic survival.
Brownfield, California
Tried to keep Mexican laborers out to
maintain higher wages for white laborers.

However, Mexican laborers became
necessary for the town’s economic survival.

Mexican enrollment in high schools rose.
Consolidation
Consolidation
Restructured loosely constructed school systems into
efficient and unified districts.
Consolidation
Restructured loosely constructed school systems into
efficient and unified districts.

    “The idea behind the consolidation movement
    maintained that larger school districts would generate
    higher teacher salaries, bestow status on educators,
    yield administrative efficiency, and generate a tax base
    where minimum educational standards were met.”
Consolidation
Consolidation
Mexican American students caused local papers to point out
problems

 ‣   Poverty

 ‣   Academic failure

 ‣   Inability to speak English

 ‣   Isolation from White peers
Consolidation
Mexican American students caused local papers to point out
problems

 ‣   Poverty

 ‣   Academic failure

 ‣   Inability to speak English

 ‣   Isolation from White peers

Brownfield school officials were not giving much attention to the
problems of Mexican American students.
“Schooling in the Pre-Brown Era”
“Schooling in the Pre-Brown Era”
 When Progressive Education (1890s-1930s) came into
 play, policymakers forgot about issues of race in
 schools.
“Schooling in the Pre-Brown Era”
 When Progressive Education (1890s-1930s) came into
 play, policymakers forgot about issues of race in
 schools.

 Progressivism evolved into an era of bureaucratization,
 tracking testing, and vocational education.
“Schooling in the Pre-Brown Era”
 When Progressive Education (1890s-1930s) came into
 play, policymakers forgot about issues of race in
 schools.

 Progressivism evolved into an era of bureaucratization,
 tracking testing, and vocational education.

 Schools sought to Americanize immigrants.
Segregation
Segregation
Schools assimilated 35 million immigrants, but
“failed to integrate a significant portion of the U.S.
Population.”
Segregation
Schools assimilated 35 million immigrants, but
“failed to integrate a significant portion of the U.S.
Population.”

In 1930, 85% of Mexican Americans attended
segregated schools.
Segregation
Schools assimilated 35 million immigrants, but
“failed to integrate a significant portion of the U.S.
Population.”

In 1930, 85% of Mexican Americans attended
segregated schools.

Mexican Americans were segregated into separate
classrooms and schools with

 ‣ Inferior Buildings and Equipment

 ‣ Poorly paid teachers
Segregation
Segregation
School boards came up with strategies to avoid
segregation laws.

 ‣ They classified Mexican Americans as Whites to
    legally segregate them.

 ‣ Texas schools claimed that it would benefit
    Mexican American students.
Segregation
School boards came up with strategies to avoid
segregation laws.

 ‣ They classified Mexican Americans as Whites to
    legally segregate them.

 ‣ Texas schools claimed that it would benefit
    Mexican American students.

Parents threatened these school boards.
Milo Hogan
Milo Hogan
Hogan (a scholar of education) claimed that segregation would
“hinder the academic progress of white children.”
Milo Hogan
Hogan (a scholar of education) claimed that segregation would
“hinder the academic progress of white children.”

Hogan claimed that Mexican Americans would be happier with
their own kind.

  ‣ Claimed that they were not as “independent” as their
     White counterparts.

  ‣ Claimed that “Mexican contact with bright white children
     [would have] damaging effects on Mexican children’s
     psychological well-being. ”
Milo Hogan
Hogan (a scholar of education) claimed that segregation would
“hinder the academic progress of white children.”

Hogan claimed that Mexican Americans would be happier with
their own kind.

  ‣ Claimed that they were not as “independent” as their
     White counterparts.

  ‣ Claimed that “Mexican contact with bright white children
     [would have] damaging effects on Mexican children’s
     psychological well-being. ”

Hogan’s ideas were widely accepted by educators in California.
Discrimination
Discrimination
Charles Carpenter gave Mexican Americans terrible labels:

 ‣   “lawless,” “dirty,” “lazy,” and “violent.”

 ‣   Claimed that they had different “morals, standards, and
     hygiene.”
Discrimination
Charles Carpenter gave Mexican Americans terrible labels:

 ‣   “lawless,” “dirty,” “lazy,” and “violent.”

 ‣   Claimed that they had different “morals, standards, and
     hygiene.”

Mexican Americans were stigmatized as drunkards who were
inclined to fight.
Discrimination
Charles Carpenter gave Mexican Americans terrible labels:

 ‣   “lawless,” “dirty,” “lazy,” and “violent.”

 ‣   Claimed that they had different “morals, standards, and
     hygiene.”

Mexican Americans were stigmatized as drunkards who were
inclined to fight.

Were considered to be workers and domestic servants.
Discrimination
Charles Carpenter gave Mexican Americans terrible labels:

 ‣   “lawless,” “dirty,” “lazy,” and “violent.”

 ‣   Claimed that they had different “morals, standards, and
     hygiene.”

Mexican Americans were stigmatized as drunkards who were
inclined to fight.

Were considered to be workers and domestic servants.

Critics wanted Mexican Americans “Americanized” before
they integrated.
Vocational Education
Vocational Education
Mexican Americans were placed in vocational schools
because they were considered to have a “natural capacity
for the manual arts.”
Vocational Education
Mexican Americans were placed in vocational schools
because they were considered to have a “natural capacity
for the manual arts.”

They were considered an economic threat whose only
solution was manual labor.
Vocational Education
Mexican Americans were placed in vocational schools
because they were considered to have a “natural capacity
for the manual arts.”

They were considered an economic threat whose only
solution was manual labor.

They were placed in low level, vocational tracks.
Vocational Education
Mexican Americans were placed in vocational schools
because they were considered to have a “natural capacity
for the manual arts.”

They were considered an economic threat whose only
solution was manual labor.

They were placed in low level, vocational tracks.

Emphasis placed on “hard work,” not academic
preparation

 ‣ “Manual Training,” “Domestic Science,” “Hygiene,”
     “Home-Making Skills”
IQ Testing
IQ Testing

Mexican Americans were considered low scorers
compared to Blacks and Whites.
IQ Testing

Mexican Americans were considered low scorers
compared to Blacks and Whites.

Whites were considered to be the highest achievers.

 ‣ The average Mexican American child was
    considered to be 14 months behind the regular
    White child in public schools.
Sleeping Giant: “Emergence of
     Grassroots Activism”
Sleeping Giant: “Emergence of
     Grassroots Activism”
Mexican Americans were almost invisible when it came to civil rights and
education issues.
Sleeping Giant: “Emergence of
     Grassroots Activism”
Mexican Americans were almost invisible when it came to civil rights and
education issues.

1963 - The Mexican American Education Committee was formed.

  ‣   Called for education in Spanish language and the history of Mexico.

  ‣   Parents pushed for unbiased testing instruments.

  ‣   Lyndon B Johnson started to focus on the Mexican American.
Sleeping Giant: “Emergence of
     Grassroots Activism”
Mexican Americans were almost invisible when it came to civil rights and
education issues.

1963 - The Mexican American Education Committee was formed.

  ‣   Called for education in Spanish language and the history of Mexico.

  ‣   Parents pushed for unbiased testing instruments.

  ‣   Lyndon B Johnson started to focus on the Mexican American.

Office of Education created a Mexican American Affairs Unit to
investigate how Mexican American students were doing in public schools.
Findings
Findings

             Texas                               California
‣ 50% dropped out by 10th and 11th
 grade.
                                         ‣ 80% fell 2 grades behind white
‣ Made up 14% of school enrollment,       students.
 but represented 40% of enrollments in
 “mentally handicapped” classes.         ‣ Most left school in junior high. 89%
                                          were not completing high school.
‣ Made up less than 0.5% of University
 of California campus.
Findings
                           Mexican American
                                                          White Students
                               Students

Years Completed                        8.6                         21.1

                                    76%


Population in East L.A.       (7%
had
no
formal

                          schooling
and
9%
had
only

                             one
year
of
college.)

                          47.5-58.3% in Garfield and    2.6-3.1% in Monroe and
Dropout Rate              Roosevelt High (East         Palisades High (West
                          Side)                        Side)

       ‣ Parents and activists attributed these findings to negative
         teacher attitudes towards Mexican American children.
Mobilization of Dissent
Mobilization of Dissent
1965 - Brownfield schools were not serving needs of Mexican
American students and they were ignoring the problem.
Mobilization of Dissent
1965 - Brownfield schools were not serving needs of Mexican
American students and they were ignoring the problem.

Social Discrimination

  ‣   Housing discrimination - above market rent for substandard
      conditions or refusal to rent to Mexican families

  ‣   Mexican students automatically went to vocational programs
      and white students went to college.

  ‣   Educators expected them to act a certain way because they were
      Mexican.
Mexican American Communities
       Start to Rumble
Mexican American Communities
       Start to Rumble
Silence was common for Mexican American rights.
Mexican American Communities
       Start to Rumble
Silence was common for Mexican American rights.

1968 - Mexican American parents formed the
Communidad Organizada Para Educacion (COPE)

 ‣ COPE sought reforms in education.

 ‣ They found out that Brownfield schools had received
    Title 1 funding, but couldn’t show how it was being
    used to help their children.
Mexican American Communities
       Start to Rumble
Mexican American Communities
       Start to Rumble
COPE and school officials obtained a half-million dollar
grant to set up bilingual-bicultural elementary school in
Brownfield. The small victory led to inclusion in decision
making process for schools.

Mexican Americans still lacked representation on school
boards and held almost no position of power. They saw
forming a cohesive ethnic group would help bring about
favorable changes.
Mobilization of Mexican
American Parents in Brownfield
Mobilization of Mexican
American Parents in Brownfield
In Southwest, scholars linked Mexican American struggle
w/ bilingual education and community control of schools

Rarely ever linked Mexican American education with year
round schooling
Mobilization of Mexican
American Parents in Brownfield
In Southwest, scholars linked Mexican American struggle
w/ bilingual education and community control of schools

Rarely ever linked Mexican American education with year
round schooling

Focused mainly on education for white middle class
students in urban and suburban areas.
Mobilization of Mexican
American Parents in Brownfield
In Southwest, scholars linked Mexican American struggle
w/ bilingual education and community control of schools

Rarely ever linked Mexican American education with year
round schooling

Focused mainly on education for white middle class
students in urban and suburban areas.

Few studies were done to focus on Mexican Americans.
The Evolution of Year-Round
          Schools
The Evolution of Year-Round
            Schools
Very controversial
The Evolution of Year-Round
            Schools
Very controversial

In 1904-1915 in Buffton, Indiana the school system first experimented with the concept.

  ‣    However the idea of year round schooling usually was rejected because of
       intense public criticism.
The Evolution of Year-Round
            Schools
Very controversial

In 1904-1915 in Buffton, Indiana the school system first experimented with the concept.

  ‣    However the idea of year round schooling usually was rejected because of
       intense public criticism.

Early 20th century

  ‣    Newark, New Jersey wanted to serve non-English speaking immigrant children
       throughout the year.

  ‣    Omaha, Nebraska wanted to offer vocational training on a year-round basis.

  ‣    Buffton, Indiana wanted to institute curricular reforms.
National Resistance
National Resistance
Conflicted with athletes, extracurricular activities, summer camps, social
activities
National Resistance
Conflicted with athletes, extracurricular activities, summer camps, social
activities

Timing was bad for year-round reform, due to space and cost
National Resistance
Conflicted with athletes, extracurricular activities, summer camps, social
activities

Timing was bad for year-round reform, due to space and cost

Government support, public confidence, established cultural traditions
prevented the year-round movement to be reformed
National Resistance
Conflicted with athletes, extracurricular activities, summer camps, social
activities

Timing was bad for year-round reform, due to space and cost

Government support, public confidence, established cultural traditions
prevented the year-round movement to be reformed

In the 1960s dramatic change to US schools due to, postwar increase in
births, enrollments soared, school financial difficulties
National Resistance
Conflicted with athletes, extracurricular activities, summer camps, social
activities

Timing was bad for year-round reform, due to space and cost

Government support, public confidence, established cultural traditions
prevented the year-round movement to be reformed

In the 1960s dramatic change to US schools due to, postwar increase in
births, enrollments soared, school financial difficulties

Consequence:

  ‣   Tried to find mew solutions other then building new schools
National Resistance
National Resistance
Argued the that the traditional calendar “was established
when america was largely and agrarian society and
youngsters were needed at home during planting and
harvesting time.”
National Resistance
Argued the that the traditional calendar “was established
when america was largely and agrarian society and
youngsters were needed at home during planting and
harvesting time.”

School systems argued that a nine month schooling and a
3-month summer was failing education.
National Resistance
Argued the that the traditional calendar “was established
when america was largely and agrarian society and
youngsters were needed at home during planting and
harvesting time.”

School systems argued that a nine month schooling and a
3-month summer was failing education.

Year round school reform became more successful after
1960 but it did not have a major impact.
“[T]he long, hot summer is a period of retrogression through idleness
and boredom...[the] manner in which the traditional school calendar was
structured was an open invitation to mischief and vandalism.”

                                                         George Jensen

                       President of the Minneapolis Board of Education

                                                    The Supreme Court
“[T]he long, hot summer is a period of retrogression through idleness
and boredom...[the] manner in which the traditional school calendar was
structured was an open invitation to mischief and vandalism.”

                                                         George Jensen

                       President of the Minneapolis Board of Education

                                                    The Supreme Court
Year-Round Education Comes to
            Town
Year-Round Education Comes to
            Town
Brownfield was a very nice place to live and go to school but soon it became over
crowded.

  ‣   Every bond increase and tax increase was rejected between 1966 and 1971

  ‣   Believed year round schooling would be a solution to there problem late
      1960s

  ‣   Formed ad hoc advisory committee to study the extended school year and
      its effects
Year-Round Education Comes to
            Town
Brownfield was a very nice place to live and go to school but soon it became over
crowded.

  ‣   Every bond increase and tax increase was rejected between 1966 and 1971

  ‣   Believed year round schooling would be a solution to there problem late
      1960s

  ‣   Formed ad hoc advisory committee to study the extended school year and
      its effects	

School officials appeared to be operating under status congruent power model.

  ‣   Depended “on a thorough investigation of relevant facts before reaching
      important decisions

  ‣   Claimed to be open to new ideas
Year-Round Education Comes to
            Town
Year-Round Education Comes to
            Town
Had a large Mexican American population and served more then
1,200 Mexican immigrant students

 ‣   Believed they would benefit from the nontraditional
     calendar of schooling	

 ‣   Based on the hypothesis would improve the mexican
     migrant attendance record because they would attend
     school during the summer months.

 ‣   School officials said it was the only solution to overcrowding.
Year-Round Education Comes to
            Town
Had a large Mexican American population and served more then
1,200 Mexican immigrant students

 ‣   Believed they would benefit from the nontraditional
     calendar of schooling	

 ‣   Based on the hypothesis would improve the mexican
     migrant attendance record because they would attend
     school during the summer months.

 ‣   School officials said it was the only solution to overcrowding.

1960s early 1970s school systems were able to choose from over
thirty extended school years patterns.
“Mandated Bilingual Education
     Comes to Town”
“Mandated Bilingual Education
     Comes to Town”
Controversial because it provided curriculum and pedagogy in Spanish
for Mexican American Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students
“Mandated Bilingual Education
     Comes to Town”
Controversial because it provided curriculum and pedagogy in Spanish
for Mexican American Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students

Raised issues concerning

  ‣ Immigration

  ‣ Language Policy

  ‣ Patriotism

  ‣ Demographic Changes

  ‣ Ethnocentrism
National Debate
National Debate
Bilingualism debate arose in the 1960s and 1970s
National Debate
Bilingualism debate arose in the 1960s and 1970s

Became a Civil Rights issue that entailed

  ‣   A means for Mexican Americans to obtain mainstream respect
      for their cultural

  ‣   An instrument to fight discrimination against the non-English-
      speaking

  ‣   A device for Mexican Americans to integrate themselves into the
      education profession
Bilingualism and the Law
Bilingualism and the Law
1968 - President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the
Bilingual Education Act
Bilingualism and the Law
1968 - President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the
Bilingual Education Act

1970 - U.S. Government enters a debate
Bilingualism and the Law
1968 - President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the
Bilingual Education Act

1970 - U.S. Government enters a debate

Lau v. Nichols (1974)

 ‣ Argued that federally funded school districts had
    to provide students of foreign origin with limited
    English proficiency the services that would give
    them equal access to schools.
“[Bilingual education is going to]
tempt the infestation of
[Brownfield] with more people
from Mexico [and] aid in the
deterioration of our society as we
know it.”
                                                J. Crawlings


                               Resident of Brownfield, Texas
“[Bilingual education is going to]
tempt the infestation of
[Brownfield] with more people
from Mexico [and] aid in the
deterioration of our society as we
know it.”
                                                J. Crawlings


                               Resident of Brownfield, Texas
Opposition to Bilingualism
Opposition to Bilingualism
White teachers became frustrated with bilingual education
because they lacked the skills to work with non-English-
speaking students.
Opposition to Bilingualism
White teachers became frustrated with bilingual education
because they lacked the skills to work with non-English-
speaking students.

As the district drew closer to a Bilingual Master Plan draft,
a group of white parents and teachers, calling themselves
Concerned Citizens for Education (CCFE), sought to
defeat the expansion of bilingual education in their
district.

 ‣   They believed that it was harmful to their children.
Opposition to Bilingualism
Opposition to Bilingualism
Opposition to Bilingualism

If Brownfield did not follow the law, their would be
legal ramifications
Opposition to Bilingualism

If Brownfield did not follow the law, their would be
legal ramifications

Opponents of the bill felt that it was “foreign and un-
American.”
Opposition to Bilingualism

If Brownfield did not follow the law, their would be
legal ramifications

Opponents of the bill felt that it was “foreign and un-
American.”

Support of the bill was crucial for Mexican American
students.
Where Mexican Americans Stood
      in Desegregation
Where Mexican Americans Stood
      in Desegregation
  Mexican Americans were generally left out of the
  desegregation rhetoric until the 1970s.
Where Mexican Americans Stood
      in Desegregation
  Mexican Americans were generally left out of the
  desegregation rhetoric until the 1970s.

  Policymakers saw Mexican American students’ integration as
  a “political nightmare” because they

  ‣   Had different “linguistic needs”

  ‣   Did not fit into a “Black White context”
Where Mexican Americans Stood
      in Desegregation
  Mexican Americans were generally left out of the
  desegregation rhetoric until the 1970s.

  Policymakers saw Mexican American students’ integration as
  a “political nightmare” because they

  ‣   Had different “linguistic needs”

  ‣   Did not fit into a “Black White context”

  In the 1970s, policymakers questioned the “ethnic status” of
  Mexican Americans.
Where Mexican Americans Stood
      in Desegregation
  Mexican Americans were generally left out of the
  desegregation rhetoric until the 1970s.

  Policymakers saw Mexican American students’ integration as
  a “political nightmare” because they

  ‣   Had different “linguistic needs”

  ‣   Did not fit into a “Black White context”

  In the 1970s, policymakers questioned the “ethnic status” of
  Mexican Americans.

  The Keyes v. School District No. 1 decision determined that
  Mexican Americans were a “protected minority group.”
Indeed, the District Court
recognized this in classifying
predominantly Hispano schools as
"segregated" schools in their own
right. But there is also much
evidence that, in the Southwest,
Hispanos and Negroes have a great
many things in common.
                          SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


           Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colorado (1973)
Indeed, the District Court
recognized this in classifying
predominantly Hispano schools as
"segregated" schools in their own
right. But there is also much
evidence that, in the Southwest,
Hispanos and Negroes have a great
many things in common.
                          SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


           Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colorado (1973)
Ethnic Isolation
Ethnic Isolation
In the mid-1970s, Mexican American students were
slightly more isolated, ethnically, than African
American students.
Ethnic Isolation
In the mid-1970s, Mexican American students were
slightly more isolated, ethnically, than African
American students.
Ethnic Isolation
In the mid-1970s, Mexican American students were
slightly more isolation, ethnically, than African
American students.
Ethnic Isolation
In the mid-1970s, Mexican American students were
slightly more isolation, ethnically, than African
American students.
Ethnic Isolation
In the mid-1970s, Mexican American students were
slightly more isolation, ethnically, than African
American students.

These ethnically isolated schools were
inferior.

 ‣ “‘Inadeqaute Resources, poor equipment,
    and unfit building construction”
Segregation Within
Desegregated Schools
Segregation Within
Desegregated Schools
Segregation Within
      Desegregated Schools
Mexican Americans were placed into low track courses
because they were English Language Learners.
Segregation Within
      Desegregated Schools
Mexican Americans were placed into low track courses
because they were English Language Learners.

   Educators believed that ELL should “improve their
   competency in English before mixing with white
   children.”
Segregation Within
      Desegregated Schools
Mexican Americans were placed into low track courses
because they were English Language Learners.

   Educators believed that ELL should “improve their
   competency in English before mixing with white
   children.”

Became over-represented in lower tracks
Segregation Within
      Desegregated Schools
Mexican Americans were placed into low track courses
because they were English Language Learners.

   Educators believed that ELL should “improve their
   competency in English before mixing with white
   children.”

Became over-represented in lower tracks

  1 in 3 Mexican American students was in a low-ability
  class (1 in 7 for White students)
Segregation Within
      Desegregated Schools
Mexican Americans were placed into low track courses
because they were English Language Learners.

   Educators believed that ELL should “improve their
   competency in English before mixing with white
   children.”

Became over-represented in lower tracks

  1 in 3 Mexican American students was in a low-ability
  class (1 in 7 for White students)

  1 in 7 Mexican American students were in high-ability
  classes (1 in 4 for White studentsMexican Americans were
  generally left out of the desegregation rhetoric until the
Segregation Within
Desegregated Schools
Segregation Within
      Desegregated Schools
In the 1970s policymakers realized that separating

language-minority students was segregation.


 ‣   Some felt that bilingual education and integration

     contradicted each other.
Segregation Within
      Desegregated Schools
In the 1970s policymakers realized that separating

language-minority students was segregation.


 ‣   Some felt that bilingual education and integration

     contradicted each other.


Integration and bilingual education were “pitt[ed]”

against each other.
Continued Struggle For Equitable
        Desegregation
Continued Struggle For Equitable
        Desegregation
 Policymakers in the 1970s attempted to “prevent and
 eliminate...racial imbalance.”
Continued Struggle For Equitable
        Desegregation
 Policymakers in the 1970s attempted to “prevent and
 eliminate...racial imbalance.”
 Minority students in Brownfield were “bused” to the
 White school (Atherton) to achieve integration.
Continued Struggle For Equitable
        Desegregation
 Policymakers in the 1970s attempted to “prevent and
 eliminate...racial imbalance.”
 Minority students in Brownfield were “bused” to the
 White school (Atherton) to achieve integration.
 Busing had proved unsuccessful by the 1980s.
Continued Struggle For Equitable
        Desegregation
 Policymakers in the 1970s attempted to “prevent and
 eliminate...racial imbalance.”
 Minority students in Brownfield were “bused” to the
 White school (Atherton) to achieve integration.
 Busing had proved unsuccessful by the 1980s.
 Mexican American and White families both opposed
 busing to achieve integration.
TheOtherStrugglePresentation
TheOtherStrugglePresentation

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

American Civ Chapter two: A Land of Immigrants
American Civ Chapter two: A Land of Immigrants American Civ Chapter two: A Land of Immigrants
American Civ Chapter two: A Land of Immigrants Elhem Chniti
 
Lecture 1 freedom and the american dream
Lecture 1 freedom and the american dreamLecture 1 freedom and the american dream
Lecture 1 freedom and the american dreamElhem Chniti
 
Reparations Presentation, 2/13/2022
Reparations Presentation,  2/13/2022Reparations Presentation,  2/13/2022
Reparations Presentation, 2/13/2022Phill Briscoe
 
Mexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power point
Mexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power pointMexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power point
Mexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power pointkayteeb61
 
African Americans by Airton Fortes & Felisberto Oiveira
African Americans by Airton Fortes & Felisberto OiveiraAfrican Americans by Airton Fortes & Felisberto Oiveira
African Americans by Airton Fortes & Felisberto OiveiraAirton Fortes
 
History group project
History group projectHistory group project
History group projectswainc
 
Basic Principles of African Internationalism
Basic Principles of African InternationalismBasic Principles of African Internationalism
Basic Principles of African Internationalismapscuhuru
 
Stop the War Against the African Community
Stop the War Against the African CommunityStop the War Against the African Community
Stop the War Against the African Communityapscuhuru
 
Cubans Paper Dr Pendry-Lauren Harris
Cubans Paper Dr Pendry-Lauren HarrisCubans Paper Dr Pendry-Lauren Harris
Cubans Paper Dr Pendry-Lauren HarrisLauren Harris
 
A land of immigrants
A land of immigrants A land of immigrants
A land of immigrants Elhem Chniti
 
Understanding The State
Understanding The StateUnderstanding The State
Understanding The Stateapscuhuru
 
Zapatistas: The Struggle for Justice in Chiapas
Zapatistas: The Struggle for Justice in ChiapasZapatistas: The Struggle for Justice in Chiapas
Zapatistas: The Struggle for Justice in ChiapasCraig Collins, Ph.D.
 
Assignment 7- Modern Latin America
Assignment 7- Modern Latin AmericaAssignment 7- Modern Latin America
Assignment 7- Modern Latin AmericaTSkarnas
 

Mais procurados (20)

American Civ Chapter two: A Land of Immigrants
American Civ Chapter two: A Land of Immigrants American Civ Chapter two: A Land of Immigrants
American Civ Chapter two: A Land of Immigrants
 
Latino Heritage Month
Latino Heritage MonthLatino Heritage Month
Latino Heritage Month
 
Lecture 1 freedom and the american dream
Lecture 1 freedom and the american dreamLecture 1 freedom and the american dream
Lecture 1 freedom and the american dream
 
Reparations Presentation, 2/13/2022
Reparations Presentation,  2/13/2022Reparations Presentation,  2/13/2022
Reparations Presentation, 2/13/2022
 
Mexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power point
Mexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power pointMexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power point
Mexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power point
 
Latin america
Latin americaLatin america
Latin america
 
African Americans by Airton Fortes & Felisberto Oiveira
African Americans by Airton Fortes & Felisberto OiveiraAfrican Americans by Airton Fortes & Felisberto Oiveira
African Americans by Airton Fortes & Felisberto Oiveira
 
History group project
History group projectHistory group project
History group project
 
Basic Principles of African Internationalism
Basic Principles of African InternationalismBasic Principles of African Internationalism
Basic Principles of African Internationalism
 
Stop the War Against the African Community
Stop the War Against the African CommunityStop the War Against the African Community
Stop the War Against the African Community
 
Cubans Paper Dr Pendry-Lauren Harris
Cubans Paper Dr Pendry-Lauren HarrisCubans Paper Dr Pendry-Lauren Harris
Cubans Paper Dr Pendry-Lauren Harris
 
Mexicanos
MexicanosMexicanos
Mexicanos
 
Multiracial America
Multiracial AmericaMultiracial America
Multiracial America
 
Zapatistas
ZapatistasZapatistas
Zapatistas
 
A land of immigrants
A land of immigrants A land of immigrants
A land of immigrants
 
Understanding The State
Understanding The StateUnderstanding The State
Understanding The State
 
Zapatistas: The Struggle for Justice in Chiapas
Zapatistas: The Struggle for Justice in ChiapasZapatistas: The Struggle for Justice in Chiapas
Zapatistas: The Struggle for Justice in Chiapas
 
Who are the Zapatistas?
Who are the Zapatistas?Who are the Zapatistas?
Who are the Zapatistas?
 
Assignment 7- Modern Latin America
Assignment 7- Modern Latin AmericaAssignment 7- Modern Latin America
Assignment 7- Modern Latin America
 
4 race in_colonial_america
4 race in_colonial_america4 race in_colonial_america
4 race in_colonial_america
 

Semelhante a TheOtherStrugglePresentation

Mexican American Women
Mexican American WomenMexican American Women
Mexican American WomenRobin Anderson
 
Mexicanos
MexicanosMexicanos
Mexicanosbjt223
 
The Chicano Movement By Frank Romero
The Chicano Movement By Frank RomeroThe Chicano Movement By Frank Romero
The Chicano Movement By Frank RomeroJessica Lopez
 
Hispanic Culture And Mexican-Americans
Hispanic Culture And Mexican-AmericansHispanic Culture And Mexican-Americans
Hispanic Culture And Mexican-AmericansAshley Jean
 
Mexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power point
Mexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power pointMexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power point
Mexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power pointkayteeb61
 
What People Think About Illegal Mexicans
What People Think About Illegal MexicansWhat People Think About Illegal Mexicans
What People Think About Illegal MexicansStephanie Williams
 
Dr. Natalia Molina's slides
Dr. Natalia Molina's slidesDr. Natalia Molina's slides
Dr. Natalia Molina's slidesMary Hendra
 
Assignment 9 part 1
Assignment 9 part 1Assignment 9 part 1
Assignment 9 part 1mhernandez29
 

Semelhante a TheOtherStrugglePresentation (10)

Mexican American Women
Mexican American WomenMexican American Women
Mexican American Women
 
Mexicanos
MexicanosMexicanos
Mexicanos
 
The Chicano Movement By Frank Romero
The Chicano Movement By Frank RomeroThe Chicano Movement By Frank Romero
The Chicano Movement By Frank Romero
 
Hispanic Culture And Mexican-Americans
Hispanic Culture And Mexican-AmericansHispanic Culture And Mexican-Americans
Hispanic Culture And Mexican-Americans
 
Mexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power point
Mexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power pointMexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power point
Mexicanos by manuel e gonzalez power point
 
What People Think About Illegal Mexicans
What People Think About Illegal MexicansWhat People Think About Illegal Mexicans
What People Think About Illegal Mexicans
 
Mexicanos
MexicanosMexicanos
Mexicanos
 
Dr. Natalia Molina's slides
Dr. Natalia Molina's slidesDr. Natalia Molina's slides
Dr. Natalia Molina's slides
 
Assignment 9 part 1
Assignment 9 part 1Assignment 9 part 1
Assignment 9 part 1
 
Mexican Immigration In America
Mexican Immigration In AmericaMexican Immigration In America
Mexican Immigration In America
 

TheOtherStrugglePresentation

  • 1.
  • 2. The Mexican American Civil Rights Movement
  • 3. The Chicano Movement
  • 4. The Chicano Movement
  • 5. El Movimiento
  • 6. The Other Struggle For Equal Schools: Mexican Americans During the Civil Rights Movement
  • 7. The Other Struggle For Equal Schools: Mexican Americans During the Civil Rights Movement Rubén Donato Presentation By Ellison Williams Melissa Rodriguez Amanda Tanti Vincent Narcia David Aponte
  • 8. The Evolution of the Mexican American Community
  • 9. The Evolution of the Mexican American Community Mexican-American War (1846-1848) ‣ Mexico lost the war and half of its territory ‣ Approx. 6000 Mexicans had to move or become U.S. citizens
  • 10. The Evolution of the Mexican American Community Mexican-American War (1846-1848) ‣ Mexico lost the war and half of its territory ‣ Approx. 6000 Mexicans had to move or become U.S. citizens California ‣ Mexico lost half its territory ‣ Approx. 6000 Mexicans had to move or become U.S. citizens
  • 11. The Evolution of the Mexican American Community Mexican-American War (1846-1848) ‣ Mexico lost the war and half of its territory ‣ Approx. 6000 Mexicans had to move or become U.S. citizens California ‣ Mexico lost half its territory ‣ Approx. 6000 Mexicans had to move or become U.S. citizens GOLD! ‣ 1850 brought an influx of white settlers and made Mexicans a minority group. Gold depleted miners turned to farming and squatting. ‣ Encroached onto properties with rent and good faith payments.
  • 12. The Evolution of the Mexican American Community
  • 13. The Evolution of the Mexican American Community ‣ Settlers started to acquire positions in government and challenge land ownership of Mexican Americans/Californios
  • 14. The Evolution of the Mexican American Community ‣ Settlers started to acquire positions in government and challenge land ownership of Mexican Americans/Californios Land Act of 1851 ‣ Called for land titles, which Mexicans did not have. ‣ Mexicans/Californios could not afford legal fees to fight for land. ‣ When legal matters would not take their land, armed squatters or lynchers would force them off their property.
  • 15. The Evolution of the Mexican American Community ‣ Settlers started to acquire positions in government and challenge land ownership of Mexican Americans/Californios Land Act of 1851 ‣ Called for land titles, which Mexicans did not have. ‣ Mexicans/Californios could not afford legal fees to fight for land. ‣ When legal matters would not take their land, armed squatters or lynchers would force them off their property. White settlers thought that the amount of land that Mexicans owned was outrageous. ‣ It was impossible for the Mexicans to defend their property.
  • 17. Northward Tide Immigrating Mexicans made up labor force. ‣ Even former middle class was forced to become unskilled or semiskilled laborers. ‣ Caused tensions with Americans due to employers hiring Mexicans for cheap labor.
  • 18. Northward Tide Immigrating Mexicans made up labor force. ‣ Even former middle class was forced to become unskilled or semiskilled laborers. ‣ Caused tensions with Americans due to employers hiring Mexicans for cheap labor. Bracero Program ‣ US/Mexico deal in 1942 for temporary contracted labor. ‣ It ended up lasting for over 20 years. ‣ 1946-1960, an average of 278, 800 Mexican Bracero were brought in each year
  • 20. Brownfield, California Tried to keep Mexican laborers out to maintain higher wages for white laborers.
  • 21. Brownfield, California Tried to keep Mexican laborers out to maintain higher wages for white laborers. However, Mexican laborers became necessary for the town’s economic survival.
  • 22. Brownfield, California Tried to keep Mexican laborers out to maintain higher wages for white laborers. However, Mexican laborers became necessary for the town’s economic survival. Mexican enrollment in high schools rose.
  • 24. Consolidation Restructured loosely constructed school systems into efficient and unified districts.
  • 25. Consolidation Restructured loosely constructed school systems into efficient and unified districts. “The idea behind the consolidation movement maintained that larger school districts would generate higher teacher salaries, bestow status on educators, yield administrative efficiency, and generate a tax base where minimum educational standards were met.”
  • 27. Consolidation Mexican American students caused local papers to point out problems ‣ Poverty ‣ Academic failure ‣ Inability to speak English ‣ Isolation from White peers
  • 28. Consolidation Mexican American students caused local papers to point out problems ‣ Poverty ‣ Academic failure ‣ Inability to speak English ‣ Isolation from White peers Brownfield school officials were not giving much attention to the problems of Mexican American students.
  • 29. “Schooling in the Pre-Brown Era”
  • 30. “Schooling in the Pre-Brown Era” When Progressive Education (1890s-1930s) came into play, policymakers forgot about issues of race in schools.
  • 31. “Schooling in the Pre-Brown Era” When Progressive Education (1890s-1930s) came into play, policymakers forgot about issues of race in schools. Progressivism evolved into an era of bureaucratization, tracking testing, and vocational education.
  • 32. “Schooling in the Pre-Brown Era” When Progressive Education (1890s-1930s) came into play, policymakers forgot about issues of race in schools. Progressivism evolved into an era of bureaucratization, tracking testing, and vocational education. Schools sought to Americanize immigrants.
  • 34. Segregation Schools assimilated 35 million immigrants, but “failed to integrate a significant portion of the U.S. Population.”
  • 35. Segregation Schools assimilated 35 million immigrants, but “failed to integrate a significant portion of the U.S. Population.” In 1930, 85% of Mexican Americans attended segregated schools.
  • 36. Segregation Schools assimilated 35 million immigrants, but “failed to integrate a significant portion of the U.S. Population.” In 1930, 85% of Mexican Americans attended segregated schools. Mexican Americans were segregated into separate classrooms and schools with ‣ Inferior Buildings and Equipment ‣ Poorly paid teachers
  • 38. Segregation School boards came up with strategies to avoid segregation laws. ‣ They classified Mexican Americans as Whites to legally segregate them. ‣ Texas schools claimed that it would benefit Mexican American students.
  • 39. Segregation School boards came up with strategies to avoid segregation laws. ‣ They classified Mexican Americans as Whites to legally segregate them. ‣ Texas schools claimed that it would benefit Mexican American students. Parents threatened these school boards.
  • 41. Milo Hogan Hogan (a scholar of education) claimed that segregation would “hinder the academic progress of white children.”
  • 42. Milo Hogan Hogan (a scholar of education) claimed that segregation would “hinder the academic progress of white children.” Hogan claimed that Mexican Americans would be happier with their own kind. ‣ Claimed that they were not as “independent” as their White counterparts. ‣ Claimed that “Mexican contact with bright white children [would have] damaging effects on Mexican children’s psychological well-being. ”
  • 43. Milo Hogan Hogan (a scholar of education) claimed that segregation would “hinder the academic progress of white children.” Hogan claimed that Mexican Americans would be happier with their own kind. ‣ Claimed that they were not as “independent” as their White counterparts. ‣ Claimed that “Mexican contact with bright white children [would have] damaging effects on Mexican children’s psychological well-being. ” Hogan’s ideas were widely accepted by educators in California.
  • 44.
  • 45.
  • 47. Discrimination Charles Carpenter gave Mexican Americans terrible labels: ‣ “lawless,” “dirty,” “lazy,” and “violent.” ‣ Claimed that they had different “morals, standards, and hygiene.”
  • 48. Discrimination Charles Carpenter gave Mexican Americans terrible labels: ‣ “lawless,” “dirty,” “lazy,” and “violent.” ‣ Claimed that they had different “morals, standards, and hygiene.” Mexican Americans were stigmatized as drunkards who were inclined to fight.
  • 49. Discrimination Charles Carpenter gave Mexican Americans terrible labels: ‣ “lawless,” “dirty,” “lazy,” and “violent.” ‣ Claimed that they had different “morals, standards, and hygiene.” Mexican Americans were stigmatized as drunkards who were inclined to fight. Were considered to be workers and domestic servants.
  • 50. Discrimination Charles Carpenter gave Mexican Americans terrible labels: ‣ “lawless,” “dirty,” “lazy,” and “violent.” ‣ Claimed that they had different “morals, standards, and hygiene.” Mexican Americans were stigmatized as drunkards who were inclined to fight. Were considered to be workers and domestic servants. Critics wanted Mexican Americans “Americanized” before they integrated.
  • 52. Vocational Education Mexican Americans were placed in vocational schools because they were considered to have a “natural capacity for the manual arts.”
  • 53. Vocational Education Mexican Americans were placed in vocational schools because they were considered to have a “natural capacity for the manual arts.” They were considered an economic threat whose only solution was manual labor.
  • 54. Vocational Education Mexican Americans were placed in vocational schools because they were considered to have a “natural capacity for the manual arts.” They were considered an economic threat whose only solution was manual labor. They were placed in low level, vocational tracks.
  • 55. Vocational Education Mexican Americans were placed in vocational schools because they were considered to have a “natural capacity for the manual arts.” They were considered an economic threat whose only solution was manual labor. They were placed in low level, vocational tracks. Emphasis placed on “hard work,” not academic preparation ‣ “Manual Training,” “Domestic Science,” “Hygiene,” “Home-Making Skills”
  • 57. IQ Testing Mexican Americans were considered low scorers compared to Blacks and Whites.
  • 58. IQ Testing Mexican Americans were considered low scorers compared to Blacks and Whites. Whites were considered to be the highest achievers. ‣ The average Mexican American child was considered to be 14 months behind the regular White child in public schools.
  • 59. Sleeping Giant: “Emergence of Grassroots Activism”
  • 60. Sleeping Giant: “Emergence of Grassroots Activism” Mexican Americans were almost invisible when it came to civil rights and education issues.
  • 61. Sleeping Giant: “Emergence of Grassroots Activism” Mexican Americans were almost invisible when it came to civil rights and education issues. 1963 - The Mexican American Education Committee was formed. ‣ Called for education in Spanish language and the history of Mexico. ‣ Parents pushed for unbiased testing instruments. ‣ Lyndon B Johnson started to focus on the Mexican American.
  • 62. Sleeping Giant: “Emergence of Grassroots Activism” Mexican Americans were almost invisible when it came to civil rights and education issues. 1963 - The Mexican American Education Committee was formed. ‣ Called for education in Spanish language and the history of Mexico. ‣ Parents pushed for unbiased testing instruments. ‣ Lyndon B Johnson started to focus on the Mexican American. Office of Education created a Mexican American Affairs Unit to investigate how Mexican American students were doing in public schools.
  • 64. Findings Texas California ‣ 50% dropped out by 10th and 11th grade. ‣ 80% fell 2 grades behind white ‣ Made up 14% of school enrollment, students. but represented 40% of enrollments in “mentally handicapped” classes. ‣ Most left school in junior high. 89% were not completing high school. ‣ Made up less than 0.5% of University of California campus.
  • 65. Findings Mexican American White Students Students Years Completed 8.6 21.1 76%
 Population in East L.A. (7%
had
no
formal
 schooling
and
9%
had
only
 one
year
of
college.) 47.5-58.3% in Garfield and 2.6-3.1% in Monroe and Dropout Rate Roosevelt High (East Palisades High (West Side) Side) ‣ Parents and activists attributed these findings to negative teacher attitudes towards Mexican American children.
  • 67. Mobilization of Dissent 1965 - Brownfield schools were not serving needs of Mexican American students and they were ignoring the problem.
  • 68. Mobilization of Dissent 1965 - Brownfield schools were not serving needs of Mexican American students and they were ignoring the problem. Social Discrimination ‣ Housing discrimination - above market rent for substandard conditions or refusal to rent to Mexican families ‣ Mexican students automatically went to vocational programs and white students went to college. ‣ Educators expected them to act a certain way because they were Mexican.
  • 69. Mexican American Communities Start to Rumble
  • 70. Mexican American Communities Start to Rumble Silence was common for Mexican American rights.
  • 71. Mexican American Communities Start to Rumble Silence was common for Mexican American rights. 1968 - Mexican American parents formed the Communidad Organizada Para Educacion (COPE) ‣ COPE sought reforms in education. ‣ They found out that Brownfield schools had received Title 1 funding, but couldn’t show how it was being used to help their children.
  • 72. Mexican American Communities Start to Rumble
  • 73. Mexican American Communities Start to Rumble COPE and school officials obtained a half-million dollar grant to set up bilingual-bicultural elementary school in Brownfield. The small victory led to inclusion in decision making process for schools. Mexican Americans still lacked representation on school boards and held almost no position of power. They saw forming a cohesive ethnic group would help bring about favorable changes.
  • 74. Mobilization of Mexican American Parents in Brownfield
  • 75. Mobilization of Mexican American Parents in Brownfield In Southwest, scholars linked Mexican American struggle w/ bilingual education and community control of schools Rarely ever linked Mexican American education with year round schooling
  • 76. Mobilization of Mexican American Parents in Brownfield In Southwest, scholars linked Mexican American struggle w/ bilingual education and community control of schools Rarely ever linked Mexican American education with year round schooling Focused mainly on education for white middle class students in urban and suburban areas.
  • 77. Mobilization of Mexican American Parents in Brownfield In Southwest, scholars linked Mexican American struggle w/ bilingual education and community control of schools Rarely ever linked Mexican American education with year round schooling Focused mainly on education for white middle class students in urban and suburban areas. Few studies were done to focus on Mexican Americans.
  • 78. The Evolution of Year-Round Schools
  • 79. The Evolution of Year-Round Schools Very controversial
  • 80. The Evolution of Year-Round Schools Very controversial In 1904-1915 in Buffton, Indiana the school system first experimented with the concept. ‣ However the idea of year round schooling usually was rejected because of intense public criticism.
  • 81. The Evolution of Year-Round Schools Very controversial In 1904-1915 in Buffton, Indiana the school system first experimented with the concept. ‣ However the idea of year round schooling usually was rejected because of intense public criticism. Early 20th century ‣ Newark, New Jersey wanted to serve non-English speaking immigrant children throughout the year. ‣ Omaha, Nebraska wanted to offer vocational training on a year-round basis. ‣ Buffton, Indiana wanted to institute curricular reforms.
  • 83. National Resistance Conflicted with athletes, extracurricular activities, summer camps, social activities
  • 84. National Resistance Conflicted with athletes, extracurricular activities, summer camps, social activities Timing was bad for year-round reform, due to space and cost
  • 85. National Resistance Conflicted with athletes, extracurricular activities, summer camps, social activities Timing was bad for year-round reform, due to space and cost Government support, public confidence, established cultural traditions prevented the year-round movement to be reformed
  • 86. National Resistance Conflicted with athletes, extracurricular activities, summer camps, social activities Timing was bad for year-round reform, due to space and cost Government support, public confidence, established cultural traditions prevented the year-round movement to be reformed In the 1960s dramatic change to US schools due to, postwar increase in births, enrollments soared, school financial difficulties
  • 87. National Resistance Conflicted with athletes, extracurricular activities, summer camps, social activities Timing was bad for year-round reform, due to space and cost Government support, public confidence, established cultural traditions prevented the year-round movement to be reformed In the 1960s dramatic change to US schools due to, postwar increase in births, enrollments soared, school financial difficulties Consequence: ‣ Tried to find mew solutions other then building new schools
  • 89. National Resistance Argued the that the traditional calendar “was established when america was largely and agrarian society and youngsters were needed at home during planting and harvesting time.”
  • 90. National Resistance Argued the that the traditional calendar “was established when america was largely and agrarian society and youngsters were needed at home during planting and harvesting time.” School systems argued that a nine month schooling and a 3-month summer was failing education.
  • 91. National Resistance Argued the that the traditional calendar “was established when america was largely and agrarian society and youngsters were needed at home during planting and harvesting time.” School systems argued that a nine month schooling and a 3-month summer was failing education. Year round school reform became more successful after 1960 but it did not have a major impact.
  • 92. “[T]he long, hot summer is a period of retrogression through idleness and boredom...[the] manner in which the traditional school calendar was structured was an open invitation to mischief and vandalism.” George Jensen President of the Minneapolis Board of Education The Supreme Court
  • 93. “[T]he long, hot summer is a period of retrogression through idleness and boredom...[the] manner in which the traditional school calendar was structured was an open invitation to mischief and vandalism.” George Jensen President of the Minneapolis Board of Education The Supreme Court
  • 95. Year-Round Education Comes to Town Brownfield was a very nice place to live and go to school but soon it became over crowded. ‣ Every bond increase and tax increase was rejected between 1966 and 1971 ‣ Believed year round schooling would be a solution to there problem late 1960s ‣ Formed ad hoc advisory committee to study the extended school year and its effects
  • 96. Year-Round Education Comes to Town Brownfield was a very nice place to live and go to school but soon it became over crowded. ‣ Every bond increase and tax increase was rejected between 1966 and 1971 ‣ Believed year round schooling would be a solution to there problem late 1960s ‣ Formed ad hoc advisory committee to study the extended school year and its effects School officials appeared to be operating under status congruent power model. ‣ Depended “on a thorough investigation of relevant facts before reaching important decisions ‣ Claimed to be open to new ideas
  • 98. Year-Round Education Comes to Town Had a large Mexican American population and served more then 1,200 Mexican immigrant students ‣ Believed they would benefit from the nontraditional calendar of schooling ‣ Based on the hypothesis would improve the mexican migrant attendance record because they would attend school during the summer months. ‣ School officials said it was the only solution to overcrowding.
  • 99. Year-Round Education Comes to Town Had a large Mexican American population and served more then 1,200 Mexican immigrant students ‣ Believed they would benefit from the nontraditional calendar of schooling ‣ Based on the hypothesis would improve the mexican migrant attendance record because they would attend school during the summer months. ‣ School officials said it was the only solution to overcrowding. 1960s early 1970s school systems were able to choose from over thirty extended school years patterns.
  • 100. “Mandated Bilingual Education Comes to Town”
  • 101. “Mandated Bilingual Education Comes to Town” Controversial because it provided curriculum and pedagogy in Spanish for Mexican American Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students
  • 102. “Mandated Bilingual Education Comes to Town” Controversial because it provided curriculum and pedagogy in Spanish for Mexican American Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students Raised issues concerning ‣ Immigration ‣ Language Policy ‣ Patriotism ‣ Demographic Changes ‣ Ethnocentrism
  • 104. National Debate Bilingualism debate arose in the 1960s and 1970s
  • 105. National Debate Bilingualism debate arose in the 1960s and 1970s Became a Civil Rights issue that entailed ‣ A means for Mexican Americans to obtain mainstream respect for their cultural ‣ An instrument to fight discrimination against the non-English- speaking ‣ A device for Mexican Americans to integrate themselves into the education profession
  • 107. Bilingualism and the Law 1968 - President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Bilingual Education Act
  • 108. Bilingualism and the Law 1968 - President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Bilingual Education Act 1970 - U.S. Government enters a debate
  • 109. Bilingualism and the Law 1968 - President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Bilingual Education Act 1970 - U.S. Government enters a debate Lau v. Nichols (1974) ‣ Argued that federally funded school districts had to provide students of foreign origin with limited English proficiency the services that would give them equal access to schools.
  • 110. “[Bilingual education is going to] tempt the infestation of [Brownfield] with more people from Mexico [and] aid in the deterioration of our society as we know it.” J. Crawlings Resident of Brownfield, Texas
  • 111. “[Bilingual education is going to] tempt the infestation of [Brownfield] with more people from Mexico [and] aid in the deterioration of our society as we know it.” J. Crawlings Resident of Brownfield, Texas
  • 113. Opposition to Bilingualism White teachers became frustrated with bilingual education because they lacked the skills to work with non-English- speaking students.
  • 114. Opposition to Bilingualism White teachers became frustrated with bilingual education because they lacked the skills to work with non-English- speaking students. As the district drew closer to a Bilingual Master Plan draft, a group of white parents and teachers, calling themselves Concerned Citizens for Education (CCFE), sought to defeat the expansion of bilingual education in their district. ‣ They believed that it was harmful to their children.
  • 117. Opposition to Bilingualism If Brownfield did not follow the law, their would be legal ramifications
  • 118. Opposition to Bilingualism If Brownfield did not follow the law, their would be legal ramifications Opponents of the bill felt that it was “foreign and un- American.”
  • 119. Opposition to Bilingualism If Brownfield did not follow the law, their would be legal ramifications Opponents of the bill felt that it was “foreign and un- American.” Support of the bill was crucial for Mexican American students.
  • 120. Where Mexican Americans Stood in Desegregation
  • 121. Where Mexican Americans Stood in Desegregation Mexican Americans were generally left out of the desegregation rhetoric until the 1970s.
  • 122. Where Mexican Americans Stood in Desegregation Mexican Americans were generally left out of the desegregation rhetoric until the 1970s. Policymakers saw Mexican American students’ integration as a “political nightmare” because they ‣ Had different “linguistic needs” ‣ Did not fit into a “Black White context”
  • 123. Where Mexican Americans Stood in Desegregation Mexican Americans were generally left out of the desegregation rhetoric until the 1970s. Policymakers saw Mexican American students’ integration as a “political nightmare” because they ‣ Had different “linguistic needs” ‣ Did not fit into a “Black White context” In the 1970s, policymakers questioned the “ethnic status” of Mexican Americans.
  • 124. Where Mexican Americans Stood in Desegregation Mexican Americans were generally left out of the desegregation rhetoric until the 1970s. Policymakers saw Mexican American students’ integration as a “political nightmare” because they ‣ Had different “linguistic needs” ‣ Did not fit into a “Black White context” In the 1970s, policymakers questioned the “ethnic status” of Mexican Americans. The Keyes v. School District No. 1 decision determined that Mexican Americans were a “protected minority group.”
  • 125. Indeed, the District Court recognized this in classifying predominantly Hispano schools as "segregated" schools in their own right. But there is also much evidence that, in the Southwest, Hispanos and Negroes have a great many things in common. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colorado (1973)
  • 126. Indeed, the District Court recognized this in classifying predominantly Hispano schools as "segregated" schools in their own right. But there is also much evidence that, in the Southwest, Hispanos and Negroes have a great many things in common. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colorado (1973)
  • 128. Ethnic Isolation In the mid-1970s, Mexican American students were slightly more isolated, ethnically, than African American students.
  • 129. Ethnic Isolation In the mid-1970s, Mexican American students were slightly more isolated, ethnically, than African American students.
  • 130.
  • 131. Ethnic Isolation In the mid-1970s, Mexican American students were slightly more isolation, ethnically, than African American students.
  • 132. Ethnic Isolation In the mid-1970s, Mexican American students were slightly more isolation, ethnically, than African American students.
  • 133. Ethnic Isolation In the mid-1970s, Mexican American students were slightly more isolation, ethnically, than African American students. These ethnically isolated schools were inferior. ‣ “‘Inadeqaute Resources, poor equipment, and unfit building construction”
  • 136. Segregation Within Desegregated Schools Mexican Americans were placed into low track courses because they were English Language Learners.
  • 137. Segregation Within Desegregated Schools Mexican Americans were placed into low track courses because they were English Language Learners. Educators believed that ELL should “improve their competency in English before mixing with white children.”
  • 138. Segregation Within Desegregated Schools Mexican Americans were placed into low track courses because they were English Language Learners. Educators believed that ELL should “improve their competency in English before mixing with white children.” Became over-represented in lower tracks
  • 139. Segregation Within Desegregated Schools Mexican Americans were placed into low track courses because they were English Language Learners. Educators believed that ELL should “improve their competency in English before mixing with white children.” Became over-represented in lower tracks 1 in 3 Mexican American students was in a low-ability class (1 in 7 for White students)
  • 140. Segregation Within Desegregated Schools Mexican Americans were placed into low track courses because they were English Language Learners. Educators believed that ELL should “improve their competency in English before mixing with white children.” Became over-represented in lower tracks 1 in 3 Mexican American students was in a low-ability class (1 in 7 for White students) 1 in 7 Mexican American students were in high-ability classes (1 in 4 for White studentsMexican Americans were generally left out of the desegregation rhetoric until the
  • 142. Segregation Within Desegregated Schools In the 1970s policymakers realized that separating language-minority students was segregation. ‣ Some felt that bilingual education and integration contradicted each other.
  • 143. Segregation Within Desegregated Schools In the 1970s policymakers realized that separating language-minority students was segregation. ‣ Some felt that bilingual education and integration contradicted each other. Integration and bilingual education were “pitt[ed]” against each other.
  • 144. Continued Struggle For Equitable Desegregation
  • 145. Continued Struggle For Equitable Desegregation Policymakers in the 1970s attempted to “prevent and eliminate...racial imbalance.”
  • 146. Continued Struggle For Equitable Desegregation Policymakers in the 1970s attempted to “prevent and eliminate...racial imbalance.” Minority students in Brownfield were “bused” to the White school (Atherton) to achieve integration.
  • 147. Continued Struggle For Equitable Desegregation Policymakers in the 1970s attempted to “prevent and eliminate...racial imbalance.” Minority students in Brownfield were “bused” to the White school (Atherton) to achieve integration. Busing had proved unsuccessful by the 1980s.
  • 148. Continued Struggle For Equitable Desegregation Policymakers in the 1970s attempted to “prevent and eliminate...racial imbalance.” Minority students in Brownfield were “bused” to the White school (Atherton) to achieve integration. Busing had proved unsuccessful by the 1980s. Mexican American and White families both opposed busing to achieve integration.

Notas do Editor

  1. \n
  2. \n
  3. \n
  4. \n
  5. \n
  6. \n
  7. \n
  8. \n
  9. \n
  10. \n
  11. \n
  12. \n
  13. \n
  14. \n
  15. \n
  16. \n
  17. \n
  18. \n
  19. \n
  20. \n
  21. \n
  22. \n
  23. \n
  24. \n
  25. \n
  26. \n
  27. \n
  28. \n
  29. \n
  30. \n
  31. \n
  32. \n
  33. \n
  34. \n
  35. \n
  36. \n
  37. \n
  38. \n
  39. \n
  40. \n
  41. \n
  42. \n
  43. \n
  44. \n
  45. \n
  46. \n
  47. \n
  48. \n
  49. \n
  50. \n
  51. \n
  52. \n
  53. \n
  54. \n
  55. \n
  56. \n
  57. \n
  58. \n
  59. \n
  60. \n
  61. \n
  62. \n
  63. \n
  64. \n
  65. \n
  66. \n
  67. \n
  68. \n
  69. \n
  70. \n
  71. \n
  72. \n
  73. \n
  74. \n
  75. \n
  76. \n
  77. \n
  78. \n
  79. \n
  80. \n
  81. \n
  82. \n
  83. \n
  84. \n
  85. \n
  86. \n
  87. \n
  88. \n
  89. \n
  90. \n
  91. \n
  92. \n
  93. \n
  94. \n
  95. \n
  96. \n
  97. \n
  98. \n
  99. \n
  100. \n
  101. \n
  102. \n
  103. \n
  104. \n
  105. \n
  106. \n
  107. \n
  108. \n
  109. \n
  110. \n
  111. \n
  112. \n
  113. \n
  114. \n
  115. \n
  116. \n
  117. \n
  118. \n
  119. \n
  120. \n
  121. \n
  122. \n
  123. \n
  124. \n
  125. \n
  126. \n
  127. \n
  128. \n
  129. \n
  130. \n
  131. \n
  132. \n
  133. \n
  134. \n
  135. \n
  136. \n
  137. \n
  138. \n
  139. \n
  140. \n
  141. \n
  142. \n
  143. \n
  144. \n
  145. \n
  146. \n
  147. \n
  148. \n
  149. \n
  150. \n
  151. \n
  152. \n
  153. \n
  154. \n
  155. \n
  156. \n
  157. \n
  158. \n
  159. \n
  160. \n
  161. \n
  162. \n
  163. \n
  164. \n
  165. \n
  166. \n
  167. \n
  168. \n
  169. \n
  170. \n
  171. \n
  172. \n
  173. \n
  174. \n
  175. \n
  176. \n
  177. \n
  178. \n
  179. \n
  180. \n
  181. \n
  182. \n
  183. \n
  184. \n
  185. \n
  186. \n
  187. \n
  188. \n
  189. \n
  190. \n
  191. \n
  192. \n