Medicine 2.0'10: Factors influencing the long-term use of a web-based disease management program for self-care support of patients with diabetes type 2
Factors influencing the long-term use of a web-based disease management program for self-care support of patients with diabetes type 2 as presented at Medicine 2.0'10
Medicine 2.0'10: Factors influencing the long-term use of a web-based disease management program for self-care support of patients with diabetes type 2
1. Factors influencing the long-term use
of a web-based disease management program for self-care
support of patients with diabetes type 2
Nicol Nijland, PhD, University of Twente
Bart Brandenburg, MD, Medicinfo
Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen, PhD, University of Twente
Medicine 2.0’10, 29-30 Nov, Maastricht, the Netherlands
5. The “Who”
Characteristics n (%)
Education (n = 43) Low 5 (12)
Medium 22 (51)
High 16 (37)
Health status (n = 43) Excellent 0 (0)
Very good 6 (14)
Good 25 (58)
Fair 12 (28)
Poor 0 (0)
Diabetes duration (n = 42) 0-2 year 12 (29)
3-6 years 16 (38)
>7 years 14 (33)
Diabetes treatment (n = 43) No treatment 2 (5)
Diet 4 (9)
Diet & tablets 37 (86)
Diet, tablets & insulin 0 (0)
Diet & insulin 0 (0)
6. Statement 1: Motivate the unmotivated
eHealth technologies (eHts) will have most effect on
unmotivated & unhealthy care consumers
We need to find ways to reach people who need eHts
the most; those with the greatest need for care
7. The “What”
Main features of the web application
Online monitoring
35,2%
Personal data
26,2%
E-mail contact
23,2%
Online education
7,5%
Calendar
5,3%
Personal lifestyle coach
2,5%
Printing feature
1,7%
Total hits (n = 6289)
9. Patients’ messages
monitoring My blood sugar has been a bit higher these days. Do
you think we should do something?
affective At least I am relieved that it has nothing to do with
my diabetes!
administrative
I would like to reschedule our appointment
10. Nurses’ messages
administrative Unfortunately, I will not be present at the practice
next week.
monitoring
Weight and blood pressure look great! Keep going
on!
affective
How are you? Take care
11. Statement 2: Dialogue support
Technology use (adherence) will be enhanced through
dialogue support
More research is needed on which type of dialogue support
works best for whom…
- patients with short-term vs. long-term care needs
- purpose of the communication: task-focused vs. affective
12. Long-term use
60 Barriers to long-term use:
Mean number of hits
§ Lack of push factors
50
§ Usability problems
§ Ceiling effect
40
30
20
10
0
07/07
08/07
09/07
10/07
11/07
12/07
01/08
02/08
03/08
04/08
05/08
06/08
07/08
08/08
09/08
10/08
11/08
12/08
01/09
02/09
03/09
04/09
05/09
06/09
Practice 1 (n=19) Practice 2 (n=24) Practice 3 (n=7) Average practices (n=50)
13. Statement 3: Fixed vs. free use
The effects of technology use will be stronger…
….on patients who log-in every month (fixed use)
….than on patients who log on only once in a while (free use)
14.
15. Usage profiles
Highly active
Freq. log-ins: 45-191
Low active
Freq. log-ins: 10-96
Inactive
Freq. log-ins: 0-56
17. Statement 4: Methods
Most attrition measures perform survival analysis, like Kaplan
Meier (cut-off measure). However, such measures could not be
used in our study because they only provide insights into…
the drop in usage and not in the pattern of usage
Cut-off measures are not adequate with free-to-use technologies