2. Preamble
• Twitter: @mpedson,
• Slides and other good stuff at slideshare.net/edsonm
• Join us at http://smithsonian-webstrategy.wikispaces.com
• Beware…The opinions in this presentation are mine,
not the official policy/strategy of the Smithsonian…
• We’re a little bird
• How is this good for you as…
– A technologist? (How can you help us do this?)
– An enthusiast? A re-user? A citizen?
3. • Annotated text of "Imagining a Smithsonian Commons" on slideshare
• PowerPoint slides of "Imagining a Smithsonian Commons" on slideshare
• Video of the talk at Computers in Libraries, 2009
[video available upon request]
4. The Case for Change
The next 20 slides (15
minutes) lay out the
case for change and
“urgency”
Then, we’ll talk
about the
strategy/change
process Then we’ll talk about
what the strategy
might look like
15. The Un-Common Institution
• Search and findability
• Usability and branding
• Web 2.0 patterns
• Platform development/maintenance
• Duplication of effort
Nobody would design a world-class institution like this!
25. Vexatious Phenomena
The Demographic Tsunami
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Ages 12-
17
Ages 18-
29
Ages 30-
38
Ages 39-
48
Ages 49-
60
Ages 61-
69
Ages 70+
Percentage
Online Content Creation by Age
Internet users
November 2007 data: Pew Internet and American Life Project
26. Vexatious Phenomena
The Demographic Tsunami
“Everything we hear from people we interview is
that today’s consumers draw no distinctions
between an organization’s Web site and their
traditional bricks-and-mortar presence: both
must be excellent for either to be excellent.”
Lee Rainie
Pew Internet and American Life Project
31. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
Strategy
Execution
Strategy
Process
32. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
33. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
Pockets of excellence, but…
34. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
How Many Succeed?
How many times have you
seen one used as a tool that
does work?
Often Ineffective for
prioritizing short-term
opportunities
Not actionable
35. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
Innovation at the Edges:
A Commons in the Middle
See “Imagining a Smithsonian Commons
on slideshare.net/edsonm
Flickr Commons, Creative
Commons, MIT OCW
Where do the smartest
people work? (for someone
else)-- Where will innovation
take place? In 100k garages!
36. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
Stratified water temperature
acts as a barrier
37. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
Knowledge, communication,
action models are different
Management
Practitioners
38. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
Messages get distorted, lost
39. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
Messages get distorted, lost
40. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
The model of
“enduring wisdom”
vs
“the wisdom of crowds”
41. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
Example of DIY knowledge
creation: The Shadow Divers
42. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
The Shadow Divers
43. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
Richie Kohler and John Chatterton
See slide notes for extended quote about
knowledge advanced by “amateurs”
44. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
My neighbor JG has a small
business giving hands-on
science talks to elementary
school classrooms.
…The Smithsonian isn’t
helping her, and it should.
45. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
Capability Maturity Model
Framework for understanding what
projects you’re capable of doing
More at http://slideshare.net/edsonm
46. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
Generally low process
maturity across the org
More at http://slideshare.net/edsonm
47. SI Position
Past Strategies
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Learning Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
Strategy
Execution
Strategy
Process
50. Strategy
Execution
Strategy
Process
• Faster than traditional committee-
driven process
• Increase size of brain trust
• Improve the odds for change
• Improve odds for execution (public
promises not easily forgotten)
• Outside champions more likely to
support “commons” goals than status-
quo insiders
• Walking the Talk vis-à-vis
crowdsourcing and innovation model
• “You get what you practice”
The advantages of public,
fast, and transparent
This is THE most important slide
(OK, I’m burying my lead, but the context is important)
51. Strategy
Execution
Strategy
Process
October 2008
“What I Heard and What I’ll
Tell Senior Management”
posted to Internal Blog
Blessing and advice from
practitioners:
Fast, transparent, public
GOVERNANCE!
SUPPORT
ACTIONABLE
…last chance dude
58. Steering Committee
• Breakthrough! A FAQ on a Wiki instead of a charter!!!
Q: How is the committee going to make good decisions about leading-edge
technologies and the inherent positive and negative of internet trends when
they are not themselves internet experts?
A: It’s not going to be easy. We recognize that we aren’t experts and we may
take missteps along the way. That’s why we will be seeking advice from many
sources including internal practitioners and external leaders. We will also work
to expand knowledge of our audiences and what actual users think of the
Institution’s web and new media initiatives. The committee also recognizes the
need to establish pan-Institutional working groups to address specific issues and
opportunities, in much the same way as OCIO has established collaborative
Technical Working Groups (TWGs) to make hardware and software decisions in
recent years.
63. Deliverables/Success Factors/Risks
• Deliverables
– Vibrant productive wiki that demonstrates
– Capture current 2.0-esque activities
– 10-page exec summary
• Success (how we measure it)
– Deliver clear, actionable recommendations
– Recommendations include viable options for moving forward with no budget increase (as well as
creating opportunities for outside funding)
– Recommendations are approved
– Recommendations incorporated into pan-SI strategic plan
– Internal staff report high satisfaction with process (via workshop assessment survey, buzz)
– Workshops fully subscribed
– > 10 VIP external contributors to the wiki
– > 5 SI 2.0 external participants contribute via blog/wiki
– Smooth connection with pan-SI strategy process
64. Deliverables/Success Factors/Risks
• Risks (and mitigation)
– Audience
– BOGSAT (Bunch of Guys/Gals Sitting Around Talking)
– Fixated on "Web 2.0“
– Loss of control
– Hidden agendas, inaccuracies and falsehoods
– Sensitive or proprietary information is exposed to the
public
66. Process: Workshops to Wiki
Process at-a-glance
“The main intent of the workshops is to move relevant
information to the wiki where it can be openly
evaluated, sifted, weighed, and considered by all.”
85. Transparency—don’t blink!
Draft Strategy was out in the
open May 12th… Then it
disappeared into a committee
process. I was hoping to avoid
this, I blinked, and it’s a slow,
patient task to open it up again.
(But… should strategy-creation
be confidential, slow and
patient…? Probably yes,
sometimes)
This is the SECOND most important slide (OK, I’m burying my lead again)
92. Strategy
Execution
Strategy
Process
54 Recommendations
… with 5 “do next” items
1. Post doc to wiki
2. Synchronize with other
strategy efforts
3. Appoint a leader
4. Develop a tactical road
map
5. Embrace the Smithsonian
Commons
Preliminary
DRAFT
94. Strategy
Execution
Strategy
Process
54 Recommendations
The Smithsonian Commons as
the centerpiece of the
strategy: “Facilitate learning,
creativity, innovation through
open access to Smithsonian
collections, resources, and
communities.”
Preliminary
DRAFT
See http://smithsonian-
webstrategy.wikispaces.com
in coming weeks for Strategy
version 1.0
97. Past Strategies
SI Position
Edge Innovation/
Commons
Thermocline
Innovation Model
Shadow Divers & JG
Process Maturity
Local Conditions
Strategy
Execution
Strategy
Process
Notas do Editor
Photo, CC licensed from Representative Virginia Fox (R – N.C.), http://flickr.com/photos/repvirginiafoxx/2298030037/
““Over the last half century, various assessors had ascribed three fates to U-879: they first pronounced her lost without a trace; then sunk off Halifax in Canadian waters; then sunk of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. As the Divers studied further, they recognized that the current assessment by German naval historian Axel Niestlé—that U-879 had been sunk off Cape Hatteras—was correct. But the lesson was stark and by now familiar: written history was fallible. Sloppy and erroneous assessments had been rushed into the official record, only to be presumed accurate by historians, who then published elegant reference works echoing the mistakes. Unless a person was willing, as Chatterton and Kohler were, to ditch work and sneak off to Washington, chisel away at mountains of opaque original documents, sleep in fleabag motels, eat street-vendor hot dogs, and runoutside every two hours to shovel quarters into a parking meter, he would presume the history books to be correct. As they left Washington for New Jersey that night, Chatterton and Kohler celebrated their detective work—original research that virtually proved that the [vessel they found] was U-857. Along the way each marveled at how easy it was to get an incomplete picture of the world if one relied solely on experts, and how important it would be to further rely on oneself.” P229
““Over the last half century, various assessors had ascribed three fates to U-879: they first pronounced her lost without a trace; then sunk off Halifax in Canadian waters; then sunk of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. As the Divers studied further, they recognized that the current assessment by German naval historian Axel Niestlé—that U-879 had been sunk off Cape Hatteras—was correct. But the lesson was stark and by now familiar: written history was fallible. Sloppy and erroneous assessments had been rushed into the official record, only to be presumed accurate by historians, who then published elegant reference works echoing the mistakes. Unless a person was willing, as Chatterton and Kohler were, to ditch work and sneak off to Washington, chisel away at mountains of opaque original documents, sleep in fleabag motels, eat street-vendor hot dogs, and runoutside every two hours to shovel quarters into a parking meter, he would presume the history books to be correct. As they left Washington for New Jersey that night, Chatterton and Kohler celebrated their detective work—original research that virtually proved that the [vessel they found] was U-857. Along the way each marveled at how easy it was to get an incomplete picture of the world if one relied solely on experts, and how important it would be to further rely on oneself.” P229