The Keepers Registry: Enabling Trust in E-Journal Preservation
•Transferir como PPT, PDF•
1 gostou•1,155 visualizações
Presentation given by Peter Burnhill of EDINA, at the Digital Preservation Coalition's "Trust and E-journals" event on 31 January 2012 at the Wellcome Collection Conference Centre, Euston Road, London, UK.
![Re-thinking Trust [New Zealand Archives] ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais procurados
Mais procurados (20)
Destaque
Destaque (20)
Semelhante a The Keepers Registry: Enabling Trust in E-Journal Preservation
Semelhante a The Keepers Registry: Enabling Trust in E-Journal Preservation (20)
Mais de EDINA, University of Edinburgh
Mais de EDINA, University of Edinburgh (20)
Último
Último (20)
The Keepers Registry: Enabling Trust in E-Journal Preservation
- 1. The Keepers Registry: Enabling Trust in e-Journal Preservation Peter Burnhill EDINA, University of Edinburgh 31 January 2012 Wellcome Collection Conference Centre, London Digital Preservation Coalition: Trust and E-journals
- 8. Also acting as showcase for the activity of archiving organisations The Keepers Registry allows you to search on title or ISSN http://thekeepers.org
- 9. Soon to add activity of National Science Library of China + 3 others waiting: from Canada, UK and USA http://thekeepers.org Can also search on publisher
- 10. Royal Society of Chemistry: 74 serials being archived by the Keepers. 3 have ISSN for Online & Print; 2 ISSN for Print only. 3 agencies appear: some content ‘Preserved’, others ‘in progress’.
- 11. ‘ Wiley’: 1381 serials being archived by the Keepers. This page highlights significance of change in publisher, co-incident with change in Keeper. But this is only 1 of 139 pages of record …
- 13. 2008: JISC Journals WG, London; ISSN National Directors Meeting 2009: NASIG Annual Conference, Ashville NC, USA; Lib. of Academy of Science, Beijing; ISSN Directors, Beijing; PARSE.Insight, Germany; Knowledge Exchange, Edinburgh 2010: E-journals are Forever Workshop, JISC/DPC, London; IFLA 2010 Gothenburg; RLUK Conference, Edinburgh; Columbia Univ., NYC 2011: UKSG; ISSN Governing Body; ARL, Montreal; ALA; UNESCO; JISC Archiving Implementation Group (JARVIG) … 2012: Digital Preservation Coalition; P.Burnhill, F.Pelle, P.Godefroy, F.Guy, M.Macgregor, A.Rusbridge & C.Rees Piloting an e-journals preservation registry service. Serials 22(1) March 2009. [UK Serials Group] We have been busy building international support…
- 15. ISSN Register E-J Preservation Registry Service E-Journal Preservation Registry SERVICES: user requirements (a) (b) Data dependency P iloting an E -journals P reservation R egistry S ervice METADATA on extant e-journals METADATA on preservation action Abstract Data Model: Figure 1 in reference paper in Serials , March 2009 Digital Preservation Agencies e.g. CLOCKSS, Portico; BL, KB; UK LOCKSS Alliance etc.
- 18. lessons from the Keepers Registry (2) An example: HathiTrust
- 22. Licence Ensuring researchers, students and their teachers have ease and continuing access to online scholarly resources “ ease ” “ continuing ” P.Burnhill, Edinburgh 2009 open restricted Classic use case: article–length work as journal content access to content & services usability back content preservation Building Infrastructure for UK Digital Library
- 23. Licence Ensuring ease and continuing access “ ease ” “ continuing ” open restricted access to content & services usability back content preservation who/WAYF authentication licence registry entitlement history content registry archiving registry UKAMF registry P.Burnhill, Edinburgh 2009 Building Infrastructure for UK Digital Library
- 24. Licence Ensuring researchers, students and their teachers have ease and continuing access to online scholarly resources “ ease ” “ continuing ” P.Burnhill, Edinburgh 2012 open restricted access to content & services usability back content preservation curation A broader view of Digital Library f (digital preservation, data curation) f ( “ document tradition & computation tradition ” ), M.Buckland, 1998
- 25. Licence Ensuring researchers, students and their teachers have ease and continuing access to online scholarly resources “ ease ” “ continuing ” P.Burnhill, Edinburgh 2012 open restricted access to content & services usability back content preservation curation who/WAYF authentication licence registry entitlement history content registry archiving registry UKAMF registry Building Infrastructure for UK Digital Library
- 26. Licence Ensuring researchers, students and their teachers have ease and continuing access to online scholarly resources “ ease ” “ continuing ” open restricted access to content & services usability back content preservation curation content registry archiving registry Keepers Registry
Notas do Editor
- 02/08/12
- 02/08/12
- 02/08/12
- 02/08/12
- 02/08/12
- 02/08/12
- 02/08/12
- The priority task for librarians and academic support, locally and ‘ at the network-level ’ , is to ensure that researchers, students and their teachers have ease and continuing access to online scholarly resources. Presented here is a framework and analysis that might assist understanding of that task. Particular attention is given to article-length work published in e-journals, available in digital format, online under some form of licence - either by subscription or to be observed by the user (as is the case with Creative Commons licensing). Ease of access is regarded here as to do with usability and with licence conditions and management of authorisation. Continuity of access is regarded here as including both long-term preservation and continuing access to back copy, regardless of current subscription status. There is also reminder that we all seek ease of access to back content as well as current content, for what is online in digital format as well as what has long been on-shelf as bound paper: ease and continuity of access to content on the digital shelf. The challenge is to reason what are the cost-effective points of service for that content, and identify the required infrastructure, typically as authoritative network-level registries - above the level of the institution, potentially of international as well as national character. This is about access; not considered here are the additional, although related tasks of ‘ search & discovery ’ and ‘ sharing ’ , meaning the formal issue (or publication) of such material. Accordingly, only passing reference is made to rhe open access agend: journals registered in the DOAJ, or articles (most often the authors ’ final copy) deposited in Institutional Repositories (IRs), and to the network-level role played by the Depot for that purpose.
- The priority task for librarians and academic support, locally and ‘ at the network-level ’ , is to ensure that researchers, students and their teachers have ease and continuing access to online scholarly resources. Presented here is a framework and analysis that might assist understanding of that task. Particular attention is given to article-length work published in e-journals, available in digital format, online under some form of licence - either by subscription or to be observed by the user (as is the case with Creative Commons licensing). Ease of access is regarded here as to do with usability and with licence conditions and management of authorisation. Continuity of access is regarded here as including both long-term preservation and continuing access to back copy, regardless of current subscription status. There is also reminder that we all seek ease of access to back content as well as current content, for what is online in digital format as well as what has long been on-shelf as bound paper: ease and continuity of access to content on the digital shelf. The challenge is to reason what are the cost-effective points of service for that content, and identify the required infrastructure, typically as authoritative network-level registries - above the level of the institution, potentially of international as well as national character. This is about access; not considered here are the additional, although related tasks of ‘ search & discovery ’ and ‘ sharing ’ , meaning the formal issue (or publication) of such material. Accordingly, only passing reference is made to rhe open access agend: journals registered in the DOAJ, or articles (most often the authors ’ final copy) deposited in Institutional Repositories (IRs), and to the network-level role played by the Depot for that purpose.
- The priority task for librarians and academic support, locally and ‘ at the network-level ’ , is to ensure that researchers, students and their teachers have ease and continuing access to online scholarly resources. Presented here is a framework and analysis that might assist understanding of that task. Particular attention is given to article-length work published in e-journals, available in digital format, online under some form of licence - either by subscription or to be observed by the user (as is the case with Creative Commons licensing). Ease of access is regarded here as to do with usability and with licence conditions and management of authorisation. Continuity of access is regarded here as including both long-term preservation and continuing access to back copy, regardless of current subscription status. There is also reminder that we all seek ease of access to back content as well as current content, for what is online in digital format as well as what has long been on-shelf as bound paper: ease and continuity of access to content on the digital shelf. The challenge is to reason what are the cost-effective points of service for that content, and identify the required infrastructure, typically as authoritative network-level registries - above the level of the institution, potentially of international as well as national character. This is about access; not considered here are the additional, although related tasks of ‘ search & discovery ’ and ‘ sharing ’ , meaning the formal issue (or publication) of such material. Accordingly, only passing reference is made to rhe open access agend: journals registered in the DOAJ, or articles (most often the authors ’ final copy) deposited in Institutional Repositories (IRs), and to the network-level role played by the Depot for that purpose.
- The priority task for librarians and academic support, locally and ‘ at the network-level ’ , is to ensure that researchers, students and their teachers have ease and continuing access to online scholarly resources. Presented here is a framework and analysis that might assist understanding of that task. Particular attention is given to article-length work published in e-journals, available in digital format, online under some form of licence - either by subscription or to be observed by the user (as is the case with Creative Commons licensing). Ease of access is regarded here as to do with usability and with licence conditions and management of authorisation. Continuity of access is regarded here as including both long-term preservation and continuing access to back copy, regardless of current subscription status. There is also reminder that we all seek ease of access to back content as well as current content, for what is online in digital format as well as what has long been on-shelf as bound paper: ease and continuity of access to content on the digital shelf. The challenge is to reason what are the cost-effective points of service for that content, and identify the required infrastructure, typically as authoritative network-level registries - above the level of the institution, potentially of international as well as national character. This is about access; not considered here are the additional, although related tasks of ‘ search & discovery ’ and ‘ sharing ’ , meaning the formal issue (or publication) of such material. Accordingly, only passing reference is made to rhe open access agend: journals registered in the DOAJ, or articles (most often the authors ’ final copy) deposited in Institutional Repositories (IRs), and to the network-level role played by the Depot for that purpose.
- The priority task for librarians and academic support, locally and ‘ at the network-level ’ , is to ensure that researchers, students and their teachers have ease and continuing access to online scholarly resources. Presented here is a framework and analysis that might assist understanding of that task. Particular attention is given to article-length work published in e-journals, available in digital format, online under some form of licence - either by subscription or to be observed by the user (as is the case with Creative Commons licensing). Ease of access is regarded here as to do with usability and with licence conditions and management of authorisation. Continuity of access is regarded here as including both long-term preservation and continuing access to back copy, regardless of current subscription status. There is also reminder that we all seek ease of access to back content as well as current content, for what is online in digital format as well as what has long been on-shelf as bound paper: ease and continuity of access to content on the digital shelf. The challenge is to reason what are the cost-effective points of service for that content, and identify the required infrastructure, typically as authoritative network-level registries - above the level of the institution, potentially of international as well as national character. This is about access; not considered here are the additional, although related tasks of ‘ search & discovery ’ and ‘ sharing ’ , meaning the formal issue (or publication) of such material. Accordingly, only passing reference is made to rhe open access agend: journals registered in the DOAJ, or articles (most often the authors ’ final copy) deposited in Institutional Repositories (IRs), and to the network-level role played by the Depot for that purpose.