This document discusses engaging the private sector for development. It outlines three related but distinct agendas: private sector development, private sector finance for development, and private sector investment for development. It also discusses the various actors that make up "the private sector", instruments and tools used to engage the private sector, and ongoing debates and questions around balancing private sector interests with developmental goals.
The EIB’s innovative role in the ACP under Cotonou: Options Beyond 2020
Engaging the Private Sector for Development
1. Engaging the Private Sector for
Development
European Centre for Development and Policy
Management (ECDPM)
Dr Bruce Byiers
Helsinki February 2013
2. Overview
• Policy Context
• The “private sector”
• 3 agendas in 1
• Instruments and issues
• Implications
ECDPM Page 2
3. In the beginning…growth & the
private sector
• Until at least the mid-1990s, Africa had
“inclusive, sustainable, pro-poor, shared
stagnation”.
• Growth is necessary but not sufficient for
poverty reduction
• The elusive quest for growth…
• aid for investment
• education
• health & population
• conditional loans…
• debt relief… Incentives matter!!
• Need jobs, and therefore investment – need
private sector!
ECDPM Page 3
6. “We want to engage the private
sector…”
ECDPM Page 6
7. “...and help our own…”
• UK: “bring private sector ideas, innovation
and investment into the heart of what we
do...”
• NL: “Dutch interests first, more so than in
the past....PPPs, business instruments and
economic diplomacy can lead to gains in
both commercial profit and poverty
reduction.”
• DK: ”… strategic priority in Danish
development cooperation to work for a
strong private sector…important that Danish
business participates actively...”
• FL…
ECDPM Page 7
14. “Many ways to skin a cat”
Business level: Sectors:
International Agricultural smallholders
Large domestic Large-scale agricultural producer
SMEs Manufacturers/processors
Micro-household based Export-led industries
Multinational enterprises Extractive sector firms
State-owned enterprises Service providers
National monopolies
Market structure
Informal traders
Domestic/export
Associations competitive/oligopolistic
New entrants/incumbents
Business models: Business constraints:
"Raw" capitalism Credit access
Shared value Infrastructure
Core business models
Capacity and education level
Base of pyramid/social businesses
Fair Trade Business linkages
Corporate Social Responsibility Labour regulations
People-centered business Market exclusion
Cooperatives Business climate
ECDPM Page 14
15. Three related but distinct
agendas :
• Private sector development
Old agenda: domestic, enterprise growth,
value-addition, exports, access to credit,
business climate, firm-level skills, industrial
policy etc
• Private sector finance for development
Input side – promote and leverage private
sector finance
• Private sector investment for development
New agenda: international, partnering with
developed country firms, offset risk, link
producers & suppliers
ECDPM Page 15
16. Assumptions – development
would happen if only…..
Private Sector Development
… developing country businesses were able to
startup and expand
Private Finance for Development
…there was a way to bring in more finance for
public investments (and the private sector)
Private Investment for Development
… there was a way to encourage more inwards
investment to link with the local private sector
ECDPM Page 16
17. 1. Private Sector Development:
Issues
• How to promote structural transformation?
• How prioritise & implement reg. reforms?
• How to increase credit access?
• What role for FDI and industrial policy?
• How to promote innovation?
• How to make it “inclusive” – SME linkages?
• Big firms, better jobs?
• How to build “capabilities”
ECDPM Page 17
18. PSD Instruments
• TA for regulatory reform
• Value-chain development
• Business development services
• Making markets work for the poor
• Industrial policy
• Innovation policy
• Access to finance
• Management skills – vocational training etc
Mixed results
• Endogenous and exogenous firm conditions
• The PE of economic reforms
ECDPM Page 18
19. 2. Private Sector finance for
Development
• About inputs – private finance for development
ends
• Foundations, investment/pension funds
• Blending grants, loans & private finance
• Various purposes e.g. infrastructures, equity
funds
• Challenges
- Need to be profitable
- Risk management and balancing
- Legal environment
- Capacity to use effectively
- Primarily a lack of finance?
ECDPM Page 19
20. 3. Private Sector Investment for
Development
• Less clarity on agenda and processes
• Different underlying approaches/ideology
• From CSR to "core business model”
• Partnerships - public-private cooperation
models and CSO-business
• DFIs, ODA, non-ODA
• Promoting outwards FDI?
• What best value-added of donors here?
ECDPM Page 20
22. Debates: Common interests(?)
• Private Sector: Image and reputation, CSR,
risk absorption, high entrance costs to new
markets, unfair competition from
subsidised firms
• Donors: financial crisis and decreasing
ODA, new positive grand narrative,
financial sustainability
• Partner governments: employment
creation, raised productivity, inclusive
growth, growing capabiities, improved
business climate, new types of investment,
debt burden, interest groups, rents(?)
• NGOs and CSOs: people centred
business….
ECDPM Page 22
23. Debate: Conflicting interests
• Profitability vs optimal developmental
outcome (or people vs profits!)
• Risk-sharing balance
• Opportunity costs of finance
• National ownership
• National vs local conflicts
• Impact assessments
• Eligibility criteria or corp. track record?
• Tied aid, subsidies, PCD!
ECDPM • Tax revenues! Page 23
24. Ongoing questions…
• To what degree does the new agenda
promote structural change?
• What roles for aid and non-aid in working
with the private sector?
• What approaches for working with MNEs to
promote linkages with SMEs?
• What factors for successful
public/private/CSO partnerships?
ECDPM
• Organisational settings and institutional Page 24
factors for donor engagement with PS?
25. On-going questions…
• How to link donor agenda with local
industrial policy and country ownership?
• What about beyond global value-chains?
Especially informal trade and women?
• Focus on impacts – is this the key?
• Data availability and analysis of levels of
donor PS engagement?
• Role/usefulness of international
ECDPM
commitments (e.g. UN Global Compact etc)? 25
Page
26. In sum…
If development is the ultimate goal, then:
• Potential to find synergies – but also need
care
• Need to identify the trade-offs
• Agree on how to identify & measure impact
• Regulate expectations and understand the
mandate and capacity of the other
• Improve PS-donor-gov-CSO communication
and mutual understanding
• Focus on how to boost transformation, no
matter the financing!
ECDPM Page 26
27. Thank you
www.ecdpm.org
Bruce Byiers bby@ecdpm.org
www.slideshare.net/ecdpm
Page 27
Notas do Editor
Purpose: "The private sector and development - best practices," for TEAM FINLAND - innovation and entrepreneurship to stimulate development seminar: 1) The need to focus on Finnish added value: what is needed in the emerging markets and on specific know-how Finland can offer?; 2) Increased co-operation between academic, business and non-governmental organizations; 3) Development Financing in Social development cooperation and business in the emerging markets - check DAC peer review doc of Finland
Motivation for paper- lack of clarity among stakeholders, discussion at cross-purposes, overlapping areas of interests, analysis etc., “common or conflicting interests’ captures dome of the main concerns/debates Paper not the final word and not presenting any new analysis- more a reorganisation of existing knowledge Changing context familiar to most but worth summarising- may have implication for how the PS4D agenda is approached Need clarity given lots of actors, interests and challenges for development policy (& opportunities)
Suddenly it’s all about the private sectorSeoul Development Consensus for Shared GrowthUN Millennium Summit in 2010, 11 bilateral donorsxvii issued the Bilateral Don␣␣␣␣␣ Statement in Support of Private Sector Partnerships for Development at the UN Private Sector ForumUN Millennium Summit in 2010, 11 bilateral donorsxvii issued the Bilateral Don␣␣␣␣␣ Statement in Support of Private Sector Partnerships for Development at the UN Private Sector Forum
So this isn’t necessairly a new story, just one of donors trying to fit into something that is happening anywayAlthough mut also say that in general this is highly focused on resource-rich countries…
So, when we are talking about engaging with the private sector, who do we mean?
Also, incumbents and newcomers
The latter two can feed the first but not necessairly for finance…
Germany’s develoPPP.de, the US Global Development Alliance Program (GDA), and Sweden’s␣IAP program, all of which seek to leverage private sector funding and innovation, are open to firms from any country. The Netherlands Programme for Cooperating with Emerging Markets (PSOM) followed a similar model. The Private Sector Investment programme, which replaced PSOM in 2009, includes a list of tied countries for which only Dutch firms can apply. Denmark’s␣DANIDA Business Partnerships program and the United Kingdom’s Food Industry Retail Challenge Fund are only open to national firms.