SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 9
Sec: 2-3:
Modern Ethical Theory:
  Utilitarian Ethics
• Utilitarianism: especially influential in shaping politics, economics, and
  public policy.

• Roots of utilitarian thinking: Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), David Hume
  (1711-1776) and Adam Smith ((1723-1790), but classic formulations are
  found in Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)

• Utilitarianism: we can determine the ethical significance of any action by
  looking the consequences of the act.

• Utilitarianism: policy of maximizing the overall good or producing the
  greatest good for the greatest number.

• Utilitarianism: strong support for democratic institutions and policies.
  (Government and social institutions exist for the well-being of all, not to
  further the interest of the monarch, the nobility, or some small minorities.
  The economy exists to provide the highest standard of living for the
  greatest number of people, not to create wealth for a privileged few.
• Utilitarianism: consequential ethics
   – Good and bad acts are determined by their consequences
   – Utilitarians tend to be pragmatic: no act is ever right or
     wrong in all cases in every situation, depend on the
     consequences.
      • Example: lying is neither right or wrong, depends on the situation
        in which lying will produce greater overall good than telling the
        truth ( in such situation lying is ethical)
      • Example Case Study: Should US government pass a law that limits
        the amount of money corporate CEO’s can be paid (that can
        credited as tax-deductible)? Utilitarian approach will consider
        both alternatives. Limiting the amount of executive salary that can
        be deducted from taxes should provide a disincentive to
        corporations to pay such large salaries. As a result this world
        increase the average pay for other workers. On the other hand,
        low salaries would make it difficult to attract highly qualifies
        executives to US firms and could result in less competitive US
        companies. (both decisions are a function of what happens after
        the fact)
• Utilitarian thinkers hold that we should
  maximize the overall good, but among
  utilitarians there are different interpretations
  of what this “good” involves.
• Utilitarian position: happiness is the ultimate
  good
  – only thing that is and can be valued is happiness
  – Is the goal of ethics, both individually and as a
    matter of public policy, should be to maximize the
    overall happiness?
  – What is happiness?
• Jeremy Bentham: p.30
   – only pleasure and the absence of pain is happiness
   – Unhappiness is pain or deprivation of pleasure
   – “ Nature has place mankind under the governance of
     two sovereign master, ……..in all we think.”
• Maximizing pleasure (the utilitarian principle) is
  the fundamental, objective and indisputable
  ethical principle.
   – Maximizing pleasure is not egoistic according to the
     utilitarian principle.
      • Egoism focuses on the happiness of individual
      • Utilitarian acts are judged by the consequences for the
        general and overall good. The general good includes the
        well-being of each individual affected by the action.
• John Stuart Mill:
   – Humans are capable of enjoying a variety of experiences
     that produce happiness
   – Human happiness is not mere hedonism
   – Beside the pleasures of sensation that Bentham mentions,
     humans also experience social and intellectual pleasure
     that are different and superior to feelings.
   – Which pleasures and what type of happiness is better?
     Experienced and competent judges are the best test for
     determining the highest happiness.
      • “Of two pleasures, if there be one to which all or almost all who
        have experience of both give a decided preference, … that is the
        more desirable pleasure.”
      • “From the veredict of the only competent judeges, I apprehend
        there can be no appeal. The judgment of those who are qualified
        by t knowledge of both, of if they differ, that of the majority
        among them, must be admitted as final.”
• Mill’s Utilitarianism:
   – Does not support an uncritical majority rule in which
     every opinion what is good is treated as equally valid.
   – People need to be educated and experienced in a
     variety of pleasure before they age competent to
     judge. Once they are experienced, then majority-rule
     democracy is the best way to made decisions.
   – Ethical principle arranging society in such a way that
     we maximize the happiness for the greatest number
     of people.
      • This is attained through an educated citizenry making
        decisions through a majority rule democracy.
      • Educated citizenry is attained by allowing individuals the
        freedom of choice to pursue their own ends. Even when
        those choices are unwise, individuals are gaining the
        experience needed to distinguish between good and band,
        higher and lower, pleasures.
• Utilitarianism greatest contribution to social and
  political thought : its influence in economics
• The ethics of 20th century neoclassical
  economics-essentially what we think of as free
  market capitalism- is utilitarianism.
• Under free market economies: economic
  activities aims to satisfy consumer demand
   – The law of supply and demand: healthy economies
     produce (supply) goods and services that consumers
     want (demand)
   – Goal of free markets: allowing individual to decide for
     themselves what they want most and then bargain for
     these goods in a free and competitive marketplace.
     This process over time and under the right conditions
     guarantee the optimal satisfaction of wants.
• Free market economics fit utilitarian framework
   – End goal of economic activity (utility or welfare): maximum
     satisfaction of consumer demand
   – We do the most good for the greatest number when we get as many
     as possible as much of what they want as possible.
   – The good is defined in satisfying one’s wants.
   – The most efficient mean to attain this goal: structure economy
     according to the principles of free market capitalism.
       • Allow individuals the freedom to bargain for themselves in an open, free, and
         competitive marketplace.
       • Self-interested will always be seeking ways to improve their own position.
       • Agreements (contracts) will occur only in those situations where both parties
         believe that a transaction will improve their own position.
       • Competition among rational and self-interested individuals will continuously
         work to promote the greatest overall good.
       • Whenever this occurs in which one or more individuals can attain an
         improvement in their own happiness without a net loss in others’ happiness,
         market forces will guarantee that his occurs.
       • the market: most efficient means to the utilitarian end of maximizing
         happiness.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Utilitarianism bentham mill
Utilitarianism bentham millUtilitarianism bentham mill
Utilitarianism bentham millt0nywilliams
 
Utilitarianism Revision (RS Review Online)
Utilitarianism Revision (RS Review Online)Utilitarianism Revision (RS Review Online)
Utilitarianism Revision (RS Review Online)RobinHH
 
Utilitarianism and Doing the Right Thing
Utilitarianism and Doing the Right ThingUtilitarianism and Doing the Right Thing
Utilitarianism and Doing the Right ThingDaryl Bambic
 
Utilitarian
UtilitarianUtilitarian
Utilitariandev
 
J.S. Mill Utilitarianism and two formula of utilitarianism
J.S. Mill Utilitarianism and two formula of utilitarianismJ.S. Mill Utilitarianism and two formula of utilitarianism
J.S. Mill Utilitarianism and two formula of utilitarianismNotra Dame of Marbel University
 
Utilitarianism
UtilitarianismUtilitarianism
Utilitarianismjcklp1
 
Utiliteriansim chapter 5 lecture
Utiliteriansim chapter 5 lectureUtiliteriansim chapter 5 lecture
Utiliteriansim chapter 5 lectureMut Somoeun
 
Utilitarianism
UtilitarianismUtilitarianism
Utilitarianismbrianbelen
 
2. utilitarianism explored
2. utilitarianism explored2. utilitarianism explored
2. utilitarianism exploredt0nywilliams
 
L10 the utilitarians
L10 the utilitariansL10 the utilitarians
L10 the utilitariansArnel Rivera
 
Benthamite Approach to Aggregate Welfare
Benthamite Approach to Aggregate Welfare  Benthamite Approach to Aggregate Welfare
Benthamite Approach to Aggregate Welfare jaheermuktharkp
 

Mais procurados (18)

Utilitarianism
UtilitarianismUtilitarianism
Utilitarianism
 
Utilitarianism by Jeremy-Bentham
Utilitarianism by Jeremy-BenthamUtilitarianism by Jeremy-Bentham
Utilitarianism by Jeremy-Bentham
 
Utilitarianism bentham mill
Utilitarianism bentham millUtilitarianism bentham mill
Utilitarianism bentham mill
 
JS Mill's Utilitarianism
JS Mill's UtilitarianismJS Mill's Utilitarianism
JS Mill's Utilitarianism
 
Unit 4 Utilitarian Ethics
Unit 4   Utilitarian EthicsUnit 4   Utilitarian Ethics
Unit 4 Utilitarian Ethics
 
Utilitarianism Revision (RS Review Online)
Utilitarianism Revision (RS Review Online)Utilitarianism Revision (RS Review Online)
Utilitarianism Revision (RS Review Online)
 
Utilitarianism
UtilitarianismUtilitarianism
Utilitarianism
 
Utilitarianism and Doing the Right Thing
Utilitarianism and Doing the Right ThingUtilitarianism and Doing the Right Thing
Utilitarianism and Doing the Right Thing
 
J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism
J.S. Mill, UtilitarianismJ.S. Mill, Utilitarianism
J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism
 
Utilitarian
UtilitarianUtilitarian
Utilitarian
 
J.S. Mill Utilitarianism and two formula of utilitarianism
J.S. Mill Utilitarianism and two formula of utilitarianismJ.S. Mill Utilitarianism and two formula of utilitarianism
J.S. Mill Utilitarianism and two formula of utilitarianism
 
Utilitarianism
UtilitarianismUtilitarianism
Utilitarianism
 
Utilitarianism
UtilitarianismUtilitarianism
Utilitarianism
 
Utiliteriansim chapter 5 lecture
Utiliteriansim chapter 5 lectureUtiliteriansim chapter 5 lecture
Utiliteriansim chapter 5 lecture
 
Utilitarianism
UtilitarianismUtilitarianism
Utilitarianism
 
2. utilitarianism explored
2. utilitarianism explored2. utilitarianism explored
2. utilitarianism explored
 
L10 the utilitarians
L10 the utilitariansL10 the utilitarians
L10 the utilitarians
 
Benthamite Approach to Aggregate Welfare
Benthamite Approach to Aggregate Welfare  Benthamite Approach to Aggregate Welfare
Benthamite Approach to Aggregate Welfare
 

Destaque

November 29 2009 A Comparison Of Utilitarian Theory And Retributive Justice 1 1
November 29 2009 A Comparison Of Utilitarian Theory And Retributive Justice 1 1November 29 2009 A Comparison Of Utilitarian Theory And Retributive Justice 1 1
November 29 2009 A Comparison Of Utilitarian Theory And Retributive Justice 1 1Austin Cohen
 
Ch 2 sec 2 1 and 2-2
Ch 2 sec 2 1 and 2-2Ch 2 sec 2 1 and 2-2
Ch 2 sec 2 1 and 2-2dzhasbun
 
Chapter 5 case study
Chapter 5 case studyChapter 5 case study
Chapter 5 case studydzhasbun
 
Mod 1 notes
Mod 1 notesMod 1 notes
Mod 1 notesmverm1
 
Sec 3 1 and 3-2
Sec 3 1 and 3-2Sec 3 1 and 3-2
Sec 3 1 and 3-2dzhasbun
 
Social and ethical responsibility of management
Social and ethical responsibility of managementSocial and ethical responsibility of management
Social and ethical responsibility of managementBabasab Patil
 

Destaque (20)

November 29 2009 A Comparison Of Utilitarian Theory And Retributive Justice 1 1
November 29 2009 A Comparison Of Utilitarian Theory And Retributive Justice 1 1November 29 2009 A Comparison Of Utilitarian Theory And Retributive Justice 1 1
November 29 2009 A Comparison Of Utilitarian Theory And Retributive Justice 1 1
 
Ch 2 sec 2 1 and 2-2
Ch 2 sec 2 1 and 2-2Ch 2 sec 2 1 and 2-2
Ch 2 sec 2 1 and 2-2
 
Sec 2 6
Sec 2 6Sec 2 6
Sec 2 6
 
Sec 2 5
Sec 2 5Sec 2 5
Sec 2 5
 
Sec 2 4
Sec 2 4Sec 2 4
Sec 2 4
 
Sec 5 1
Sec 5 1Sec 5 1
Sec 5 1
 
Sec 5 3
Sec 5 3Sec 5 3
Sec 5 3
 
Sec 5 2
Sec 5 2Sec 5 2
Sec 5 2
 
Sec 5 5
Sec 5 5Sec 5 5
Sec 5 5
 
Chapter 5 case study
Chapter 5 case studyChapter 5 case study
Chapter 5 case study
 
Sec 3 6
Sec 3 6Sec 3 6
Sec 3 6
 
Sec 3 4
Sec 3  4Sec 3  4
Sec 3 4
 
Sec 3 3
Sec 3 3Sec 3 3
Sec 3 3
 
Sec 3 5
Sec 3 5Sec 3 5
Sec 3 5
 
Mod 1 notes
Mod 1 notesMod 1 notes
Mod 1 notes
 
Sec 3 1 and 3-2
Sec 3 1 and 3-2Sec 3 1 and 3-2
Sec 3 1 and 3-2
 
Sec 3 8
Sec 3 8Sec 3 8
Sec 3 8
 
Sec 5 6
Sec 5 6Sec 5 6
Sec 5 6
 
Sec 3 7
Sec 3 7Sec 3 7
Sec 3 7
 
Social and ethical responsibility of management
Social and ethical responsibility of managementSocial and ethical responsibility of management
Social and ethical responsibility of management
 

Semelhante a Sec 2 3

Econ systems
Econ systemsEcon systems
Econ systemsmrgibbs
 
Utilitarianism.pptx
Utilitarianism.pptxUtilitarianism.pptx
Utilitarianism.pptxzuhazahid3
 
capitalismsocialismmixedeconomy-110903012113-phpapp02.pptx
capitalismsocialismmixedeconomy-110903012113-phpapp02.pptxcapitalismsocialismmixedeconomy-110903012113-phpapp02.pptx
capitalismsocialismmixedeconomy-110903012113-phpapp02.pptxShruti Mittal
 
OCEE Capitalism Presentation PPT
OCEE Capitalism Presentation PPTOCEE Capitalism Presentation PPT
OCEE Capitalism Presentation PPTJames Davenport
 
Management EthicsEthics, Diversity and Organizational .docx
Management EthicsEthics, Diversity and Organizational .docxManagement EthicsEthics, Diversity and Organizational .docx
Management EthicsEthics, Diversity and Organizational .docxtienboileau
 
Global Business Lecture Slides.pptx
Global Business Lecture Slides.pptxGlobal Business Lecture Slides.pptx
Global Business Lecture Slides.pptxbecc3c
 
Adam smith and modern economics
Adam smith and modern economicsAdam smith and modern economics
Adam smith and modern economicsGlenn Rivera
 
Lesson #3: The Political Economy
Lesson #3:  The Political EconomyLesson #3:  The Political Economy
Lesson #3: The Political Economygravy503
 
Free A Billion: The Constitution is Broken
Free A Billion: The Constitution is BrokenFree A Billion: The Constitution is Broken
Free A Billion: The Constitution is BrokenFAB2020
 
Document #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesC
Document #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesCDocument #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesC
Document #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesCDustiBuckner14
 
GEC 8- ETHICS wEEK 2 - Utilitarianism.pptx
GEC 8- ETHICS wEEK  2 - Utilitarianism.pptxGEC 8- ETHICS wEEK  2 - Utilitarianism.pptx
GEC 8- ETHICS wEEK 2 - Utilitarianism.pptxrodeldbriones
 
Business Ethics Concepts & Cases .Business Ethics Concepts & Cases
Business Ethics  Concepts & Cases .Business Ethics  Concepts & Cases Business Ethics  Concepts & Cases .Business Ethics  Concepts & Cases
Business Ethics Concepts & Cases .Business Ethics Concepts & Cases Jubayer Alam Shoikat
 
PS 240 Liberalism Fall 2008
PS 240 Liberalism Fall 2008PS 240 Liberalism Fall 2008
PS 240 Liberalism Fall 2008Christopher Rice
 

Semelhante a Sec 2 3 (20)

pol4_103958.pptx
pol4_103958.pptxpol4_103958.pptx
pol4_103958.pptx
 
Econ systems
Econ systemsEcon systems
Econ systems
 
Utilitarianism.pptx
Utilitarianism.pptxUtilitarianism.pptx
Utilitarianism.pptx
 
capitalismsocialismmixedeconomy-110903012113-phpapp02.pptx
capitalismsocialismmixedeconomy-110903012113-phpapp02.pptxcapitalismsocialismmixedeconomy-110903012113-phpapp02.pptx
capitalismsocialismmixedeconomy-110903012113-phpapp02.pptx
 
Economic system
Economic systemEconomic system
Economic system
 
OCEE Capitalism Presentation PPT
OCEE Capitalism Presentation PPTOCEE Capitalism Presentation PPT
OCEE Capitalism Presentation PPT
 
Management EthicsEthics, Diversity and Organizational .docx
Management EthicsEthics, Diversity and Organizational .docxManagement EthicsEthics, Diversity and Organizational .docx
Management EthicsEthics, Diversity and Organizational .docx
 
Socialism
SocialismSocialism
Socialism
 
Socialism PPT
Socialism PPTSocialism PPT
Socialism PPT
 
Global Business Lecture Slides.pptx
Global Business Lecture Slides.pptxGlobal Business Lecture Slides.pptx
Global Business Lecture Slides.pptx
 
Adam smith and modern economics
Adam smith and modern economicsAdam smith and modern economics
Adam smith and modern economics
 
Lesson #3: The Political Economy
Lesson #3:  The Political EconomyLesson #3:  The Political Economy
Lesson #3: The Political Economy
 
Political Economy Primer.pptx
Political Economy Primer.pptxPolitical Economy Primer.pptx
Political Economy Primer.pptx
 
Free A Billion: The Constitution is Broken
Free A Billion: The Constitution is BrokenFree A Billion: The Constitution is Broken
Free A Billion: The Constitution is Broken
 
Economic system
Economic system Economic system
Economic system
 
Document #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesC
Document #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesCDocument #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesC
Document #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesC
 
GEC 8- ETHICS wEEK 2 - Utilitarianism.pptx
GEC 8- ETHICS wEEK  2 - Utilitarianism.pptxGEC 8- ETHICS wEEK  2 - Utilitarianism.pptx
GEC 8- ETHICS wEEK 2 - Utilitarianism.pptx
 
chapter03
 chapter03 chapter03
chapter03
 
Business Ethics Concepts & Cases .Business Ethics Concepts & Cases
Business Ethics  Concepts & Cases .Business Ethics  Concepts & Cases Business Ethics  Concepts & Cases .Business Ethics  Concepts & Cases
Business Ethics Concepts & Cases .Business Ethics Concepts & Cases
 
PS 240 Liberalism Fall 2008
PS 240 Liberalism Fall 2008PS 240 Liberalism Fall 2008
PS 240 Liberalism Fall 2008
 

Mais de dzhasbun

Ch. 1 Sec 1-7 and 1-8
Ch. 1 Sec 1-7 and 1-8Ch. 1 Sec 1-7 and 1-8
Ch. 1 Sec 1-7 and 1-8dzhasbun
 
Ch 1 sec 1 6
Ch 1 sec 1 6Ch 1 sec 1 6
Ch 1 sec 1 6dzhasbun
 
Ch. 1 sec 1- 5
Ch. 1 sec 1- 5Ch. 1 sec 1- 5
Ch. 1 sec 1- 5dzhasbun
 
Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4
Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4
Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4dzhasbun
 
Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4
Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4
Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4dzhasbun
 
Ch.1 sec 1 2
Ch.1 sec 1 2Ch.1 sec 1 2
Ch.1 sec 1 2dzhasbun
 
Ch. 1 sec 1 1
Ch. 1 sec 1 1Ch. 1 sec 1 1
Ch. 1 sec 1 1dzhasbun
 

Mais de dzhasbun (7)

Ch. 1 Sec 1-7 and 1-8
Ch. 1 Sec 1-7 and 1-8Ch. 1 Sec 1-7 and 1-8
Ch. 1 Sec 1-7 and 1-8
 
Ch 1 sec 1 6
Ch 1 sec 1 6Ch 1 sec 1 6
Ch 1 sec 1 6
 
Ch. 1 sec 1- 5
Ch. 1 sec 1- 5Ch. 1 sec 1- 5
Ch. 1 sec 1- 5
 
Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4
Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4
Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4
 
Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4
Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4
Ch. 1 sec 1 3 and 1-4
 
Ch.1 sec 1 2
Ch.1 sec 1 2Ch.1 sec 1 2
Ch.1 sec 1 2
 
Ch. 1 sec 1 1
Ch. 1 sec 1 1Ch. 1 sec 1 1
Ch. 1 sec 1 1
 

Sec 2 3

  • 1. Sec: 2-3: Modern Ethical Theory: Utilitarian Ethics
  • 2. • Utilitarianism: especially influential in shaping politics, economics, and public policy. • Roots of utilitarian thinking: Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), David Hume (1711-1776) and Adam Smith ((1723-1790), but classic formulations are found in Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) • Utilitarianism: we can determine the ethical significance of any action by looking the consequences of the act. • Utilitarianism: policy of maximizing the overall good or producing the greatest good for the greatest number. • Utilitarianism: strong support for democratic institutions and policies. (Government and social institutions exist for the well-being of all, not to further the interest of the monarch, the nobility, or some small minorities. The economy exists to provide the highest standard of living for the greatest number of people, not to create wealth for a privileged few.
  • 3. • Utilitarianism: consequential ethics – Good and bad acts are determined by their consequences – Utilitarians tend to be pragmatic: no act is ever right or wrong in all cases in every situation, depend on the consequences. • Example: lying is neither right or wrong, depends on the situation in which lying will produce greater overall good than telling the truth ( in such situation lying is ethical) • Example Case Study: Should US government pass a law that limits the amount of money corporate CEO’s can be paid (that can credited as tax-deductible)? Utilitarian approach will consider both alternatives. Limiting the amount of executive salary that can be deducted from taxes should provide a disincentive to corporations to pay such large salaries. As a result this world increase the average pay for other workers. On the other hand, low salaries would make it difficult to attract highly qualifies executives to US firms and could result in less competitive US companies. (both decisions are a function of what happens after the fact)
  • 4. • Utilitarian thinkers hold that we should maximize the overall good, but among utilitarians there are different interpretations of what this “good” involves. • Utilitarian position: happiness is the ultimate good – only thing that is and can be valued is happiness – Is the goal of ethics, both individually and as a matter of public policy, should be to maximize the overall happiness? – What is happiness?
  • 5. • Jeremy Bentham: p.30 – only pleasure and the absence of pain is happiness – Unhappiness is pain or deprivation of pleasure – “ Nature has place mankind under the governance of two sovereign master, ……..in all we think.” • Maximizing pleasure (the utilitarian principle) is the fundamental, objective and indisputable ethical principle. – Maximizing pleasure is not egoistic according to the utilitarian principle. • Egoism focuses on the happiness of individual • Utilitarian acts are judged by the consequences for the general and overall good. The general good includes the well-being of each individual affected by the action.
  • 6. • John Stuart Mill: – Humans are capable of enjoying a variety of experiences that produce happiness – Human happiness is not mere hedonism – Beside the pleasures of sensation that Bentham mentions, humans also experience social and intellectual pleasure that are different and superior to feelings. – Which pleasures and what type of happiness is better? Experienced and competent judges are the best test for determining the highest happiness. • “Of two pleasures, if there be one to which all or almost all who have experience of both give a decided preference, … that is the more desirable pleasure.” • “From the veredict of the only competent judeges, I apprehend there can be no appeal. The judgment of those who are qualified by t knowledge of both, of if they differ, that of the majority among them, must be admitted as final.”
  • 7. • Mill’s Utilitarianism: – Does not support an uncritical majority rule in which every opinion what is good is treated as equally valid. – People need to be educated and experienced in a variety of pleasure before they age competent to judge. Once they are experienced, then majority-rule democracy is the best way to made decisions. – Ethical principle arranging society in such a way that we maximize the happiness for the greatest number of people. • This is attained through an educated citizenry making decisions through a majority rule democracy. • Educated citizenry is attained by allowing individuals the freedom of choice to pursue their own ends. Even when those choices are unwise, individuals are gaining the experience needed to distinguish between good and band, higher and lower, pleasures.
  • 8. • Utilitarianism greatest contribution to social and political thought : its influence in economics • The ethics of 20th century neoclassical economics-essentially what we think of as free market capitalism- is utilitarianism. • Under free market economies: economic activities aims to satisfy consumer demand – The law of supply and demand: healthy economies produce (supply) goods and services that consumers want (demand) – Goal of free markets: allowing individual to decide for themselves what they want most and then bargain for these goods in a free and competitive marketplace. This process over time and under the right conditions guarantee the optimal satisfaction of wants.
  • 9. • Free market economics fit utilitarian framework – End goal of economic activity (utility or welfare): maximum satisfaction of consumer demand – We do the most good for the greatest number when we get as many as possible as much of what they want as possible. – The good is defined in satisfying one’s wants. – The most efficient mean to attain this goal: structure economy according to the principles of free market capitalism. • Allow individuals the freedom to bargain for themselves in an open, free, and competitive marketplace. • Self-interested will always be seeking ways to improve their own position. • Agreements (contracts) will occur only in those situations where both parties believe that a transaction will improve their own position. • Competition among rational and self-interested individuals will continuously work to promote the greatest overall good. • Whenever this occurs in which one or more individuals can attain an improvement in their own happiness without a net loss in others’ happiness, market forces will guarantee that his occurs. • the market: most efficient means to the utilitarian end of maximizing happiness.