SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 21
Baixar para ler offline
Method for Predicting Enzyme Storage
  Stability in Liquid Surfactant Systems




Debbie Winetzky,
Louise Wallace &
Douglas Dale

99th Annual AOCS
Meeting,
Seattle, WA
19 May 2008



                                           1
Background


  Need a quick method for predicting the storage stability
  of enzymes in liquid detergents
  • Screen a higher number variations faster
  • Faster feedback than storage stability study
  • Reduction in time


  Under utilized Differential Scanning Calorimeter in-house




                                                              2
Definitions

      DSC: Differential Scanning Calorimetry
       • Measures the heat changes that occur during the controlled increase
         (or decrease) in temperature
       • It is ideal for evaluating the effects of formulation changes on enzyme
         stability
         • pH
         • Surfactant systems
         • Builder or buffering systems
         • Minor ingredients
      Tm: Thermal transition temperature
       • The temperature in which 50% of the molecules are in their native, folded
         state and 50% of the molecules are in a denatured, unfolded state
       • Changes that increase the Tm lead to improved thermal stability of the
         enzyme in the formulation

http://www.microcal.com/index.php?id=16
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c5/Protein_folding_schematic.png
                                                                                     3
DSC is Used in the Pharmaceutical Industry to
Develop Formulations for Protein Therapeutics




    DSC has been shown to be a valuable predictor of liquid formulation stability
    for proteins and other biological macromolecules (Remmele and Gombotz,
    Biopharm, June 2000, pp 36-46; Remmele et al, 1998).
    • Excipients, preservatives, and other additives in the formulation can stabilize or
      destabilize proteins.
    • Stabilizing additives increase the Tm of proteins while destabilizing materials have
      the opposite effect.
    • DSC is used to determine the stabilizing effects of different solution conditions
      and additives.
    Heat capacity changes associated with protein unfolding are primarily due to
    changes in hydration of side chains that were buried in the native state, but
    become solvent exposed in the denatured state.




  http://www.microcal.com/index.php?id=16
                                                                                             4
Why Use DSC Instead of Other
Instruments?


   Pros
   • In-solution method
   • No purification, separation, or special preparation needed
   • Useful with turbid, colored or viscous solutions
     • Not dependent on optical measurements


   Cons
   • Low through-put due to the difficultly in loading neat detergents
     into the cells
   • Does not measure changes due to other degradation mechanisms
      • Proteolytic cleavage


                                                                         5
Adiabatic-type DSC

       How much more heat needs to be supplied to the sample
       cell to keep it at the same temp as the reference cell?




 From MicroCal MC-2 User’s Manual
                                                                 6
Pan-type DSC

 Cylindrical    How much more heat needs to be supplied to the sample   Cylindrical
  furnace       pan to keep it at the same temp as the reference pan?    furnace
                       Reference Pan                  Sample Pan
                         Base HDL                    HDL w/ enzyme




                                     Thermoelectric Disc

                               Measurement Thermocouples



http://hekabe.kt.dtu.dk/~vigild/2005_04_melitek/dsc.htm                               7
Ideal DSC Curve




                  8
Thermal Measurements Have Little
Dependence on Protein Concentration



                                                                                                    Effect of Protein
             0.00050
                         Protein concentration dependence
                                                                  72.33306
                                                                                                  Concentration on Tm
             0.00045     10 mM HEPES, pH 8.0; 0.1 - 4 mg/ml
                             o
                         200 C/hr
             0.00040
             0.00035
                                                                                                80.0
             0.00030
Cp(cal/ C)




                                buffer                            72.01371
             0.00025
o




                                0.1 mg/ml
             0.00020
                                0.2 mg/ml
                                0.5 mg/ml
                                                                                                60.0
                                1 mg/ml




                                                                                       Tm, °C
             0.00015            2 mg/ml                        71.5644
             0.00010            4 mg/ml

             0.00005
                                                               71.73301
                                                               71.66466
                                                                                                40.0
                                                              71.06292
             0.00000
             -0.00005                                                                           20.0
             -0.00010
             -0.00015

                        40            50             60        70            80   90
                                                                                                 0.0
                                             Temperature ( C)
                                                              o
                                                                                                       0.0      2.0    4.0      6.0
                                                                                                             [Protein], mg/mL

       Note: A decreasing Tm with increasing protein
       concentration would indicate aggregation
                                                                                                                                      9
DSC Will Rapidly Distinguish Whether A Protein Is
Stabilized Or Destabilized Relative To A Control



             0.00030                                                                 • Loss in enzyme stability =
                                                                       74.5332         unfolding
                                                                 69.20858 79.34625
             0.00025
                                                                                     • Some factors that may
             0.00020         Wild-type Protein A                                       influence enzyme
                             Stable variant of Protein A
                             Destabilized variant of Protein A                         stability:
Cp(cal/ C)




             0.00015
                                                                                         • pH
o




                                                                                         • Ionic strength
             0.00010
                                                                                         • Chemical interactions
             0.00005                                                                     • Oxidation

             0.00000


             -0.00005                                      Decreased        Increased
                                                            Stability        Stability
             -0.00010
                        40         50                 60            70        80         90
                                                                     o
                                               Temperature ( C)

                                                                                                                    10
Enzymes Stored in HDL Are Less Thermostable
Than Enzymes Stored in Buffer


                      Effect of detergent on protein stability compared with buffer system (pH 8.0)

                      0.0008
                                             50.3 C
                                                    o
                                                                         69.2 oC

                      0.0006
        Cp (cal/ C)




                      0.0004
        o




                      0.0002




                      0.0000




                      -0.0002
                                  40          50              60               70      80

                                                    temperature (oC)

                                           Protein in detergent 1hr incubation
                                           Protein in detergent overnight incubation
                                           Protein control in buffer

                                                                                                      11
DSC: Whole Detergent Effects

   The Tm of two different enzymes were measured in two detergent bases and
   buffer to determine if there were stability differences
   Both enzymes have poorer stability in HDL #2 than in HDL #1


                           HDL #2            HDL #1




        Protease Y                                    Protease X
                             Enzyme in buffer

                                                                              12
Whole Detergent Effects

 Sample                  Tm in              Tm in              Tm in
                      Buffer, °C         HDL #1, °C         HDL #2, °C
 Protease X              77.7               72.3               68.7
  Alt. Form. A           75.4               71.9               66.9
  Alt. Form. B           76.5               71.8               67.3
  Alt. Form. C           75.3               71.3               64.7
 Protease Y              72.5               66.7               63.2

   There are slight differences between the enzyme formulations within
   a given HDL base
   The more dramatic effect for all formulations is the difference
   between the two HDL bases


                                                                         13
DSC: Component Effects


  Single component changes were made in HDL #2 to help determine
  which may be causing instability
  Increasing the hydrotrope concentration decreases stability:
                Increasing                           Increasing
               [hydrotrope]                         [hydrotrope]




            Protease X                           Protease Y
                                                                   14
Component Effects

  Component            Prot X Tm   Δ Tm   Prot Y Tm   Δ Tm
  HDL #1, pH 9           69.3       -       65.2       -
  HDL #1, pH 8.4         69.3       0       65.1      -0.1
  Alt. Surfactant        67.9      -1.4     64.0      -1.2
  Buffer                 77.3       -       69.7       -
  1.6% Hydrotrope        75.8      -1.5     67.4      -2.3
  4.0% Hydrotrope        73.4      -3.9     65.1      -4.6
  8.0% Hydrotrope        69.6      -7.7     62.0      -7.7

  Results show that changing the surfactant type or
  increasing the hydrotrope concentration cause a
  decrease in stability
  pH is not a factor
                                                             15
Delta Tm (°C)
                                       B




                                            -1.0
                                                     -0.5
                                                             0.0
                                                                   0.5
                                                                         1.0
                                                                               1.5
                                                                                     2.0
                                                                                           2.5
                                                                                                 3.0
                                                                                                       3.5
                                                                                                             4.0
                                           as                                                                      4.5
                                              e
                                                   HD
                                                        L
                                        0.
                                          05
                                             %
                                                     C
                                                         a
               0.
                 05                         0.
                    %                         1%
                           C
                                                                                           Protease #4
                                                                                           Protease #3
                                                                                           Protease #2
                                                                                           Protease #1




                               a;                    Ca
              0.                  0   .7
                05                      %
                   %                        B
                       C                        or
                           a,                     at
                                                    e
                                                                                                                         on Protease Stability in HDL




                              0.
                                 7%
                                        Fo
                     0.                      rm
                       05
                          %                         at
                                                       e
              0.                 C
                05                    a,
 0.                %                     1.
                                            4%
   05                  C
      %                    a,                       PG
          C                   1.
                                 4%
              a,
                                                                                                                         Effect of Known Stabilizing Components




                 0.                     G
                    7%                      ly
                         B                     c   er
     0.                      or                      ol
       05
          %                    at
                                 e,
                C                       1.
                    a,                    4%
                       0.
                          7%                       PG
                                 B
                                     or
                                       at
                                         e,
                                                G
                                                    ly
                                                       c
16
Effect of pH and Ions on
Thermostability


            80.0
            78.0                                            No Ca 2+
            76.0                                            w/ Ca 2+
            74.0
  Tm (°C)




            72.0
            70.0
            68.0
            66.0
            64.0
                   3.0   4.0   5.0   6.0        7.0   8.0    9.0       10.0
                                           pH



                                                                              17
Evaluation of the Thermal Stability of a Protease in
Mixtures of Known Stabilizers: Formulations


              %          %           %          %
  Run #    Glycerol    Betaine    Formate      Water   pH     Tm (°C)
     1       10.0        10.0        0.0        80.0   5.72    72.3
     2        0.0        0.0         2.0        98.0   5.74    73.4
     3        7.5        7.5         1.5        83.5   5.96    76.8
     4       10.0        0.0         1.0        89.0   5.47    75.0
     5        2.5        2.5         0.5        94.5   5.59    73.7
     6        5.0        5.0         1.0        89.0   5.53    75.6
     7        2.5        7.5         1.5        88.5   5.85    76.0
     8        0.0        10.0        0.0        90.0   5.70    69.9
     9        5.0        5.0         1.0        89.0   5.54    75.6
    10       10.0        10.0        2.0        78.0   5.92    79.0
    11        7.5        2.5         0.5        89.5   5.49    74.6
    12        0.0        0.0         2.0        98.0   5.55    73.4
    13        0.0        10.0        0.0        90.0   5.86    69.9
    14       10.0        10.0        1.0        79.0   5.72    78.5
                                                                        18
Evaluation of the Stability of a Protease in Mixtures of
Known Stabilizers: Correlation Between Tm and
Storage Stability

                                                                       Correlation Coefficients:
                                                                       1 wk r = 0.9569
                           120.0%                                      2 wks r = 0.9597
                                         1 wk @ 40°C                   5 wks r = 0.9228
                           100.0%
    % Activity Remaining




                                         2 wk @ 40°C
                           80.0%         5 wk @ 40°C
                           60.0%

                           40.0%

                           20.0%

                            0.0%
                                    68     70          72     74      76       78        80
                           -20.0%
                                                            Tm (°C)



                                                                                                   19
Conclusion


  DSC provides a rapid method for assessing
  • The influence of formulation changes on the thermal stability of an
    enzyme
  • The influence of enzyme stabilizers on the thermal stability of an
    enzyme
  • The optimum conditions for storage stability
  Good correlation between Tm and stability measurements
  Useful method for screening enzyme formulations and
  detergent formulations for thermal effects that may be
  indicative of long-term stability



                                                                          20
More Information


  Microcal: http://www.microcal.com/
  TA Instruments: http://www.tainstruments.com/
  Setaram: http://www.setaram.com/
  General info: http://www.ThermalCal.com/




                                                  21

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Destaque

Spacecraft attitude magnetic controller
Spacecraft attitude magnetic controllerSpacecraft attitude magnetic controller
Spacecraft attitude magnetic controllerfaraagahmad
 
Aocs Intro
Aocs IntroAocs Intro
Aocs Introhome
 
Bsf08 Spacecraft Attitude Determination And Control V1 0
Bsf08 Spacecraft Attitude Determination And Control V1 0Bsf08 Spacecraft Attitude Determination And Control V1 0
Bsf08 Spacecraft Attitude Determination And Control V1 0abi3
 
Satellite dynamic and control
Satellite dynamic and controlSatellite dynamic and control
Satellite dynamic and controlZuliana Ismail
 
Profile of High Stability Oils | AOCS 2015
Profile of High Stability Oils | AOCS 2015Profile of High Stability Oils | AOCS 2015
Profile of High Stability Oils | AOCS 2015QUALISOY
 

Destaque (6)

Spacecraft attitude magnetic controller
Spacecraft attitude magnetic controllerSpacecraft attitude magnetic controller
Spacecraft attitude magnetic controller
 
Adcs
AdcsAdcs
Adcs
 
Aocs Intro
Aocs IntroAocs Intro
Aocs Intro
 
Bsf08 Spacecraft Attitude Determination And Control V1 0
Bsf08 Spacecraft Attitude Determination And Control V1 0Bsf08 Spacecraft Attitude Determination And Control V1 0
Bsf08 Spacecraft Attitude Determination And Control V1 0
 
Satellite dynamic and control
Satellite dynamic and controlSatellite dynamic and control
Satellite dynamic and control
 
Profile of High Stability Oils | AOCS 2015
Profile of High Stability Oils | AOCS 2015Profile of High Stability Oils | AOCS 2015
Profile of High Stability Oils | AOCS 2015
 

Semelhante a Dsc Presentation (Aocs)

21 quantitative lc-msms analysis of 15 estrogens and estrogen metabolites in ...
21 quantitative lc-msms analysis of 15 estrogens and estrogen metabolites in ...21 quantitative lc-msms analysis of 15 estrogens and estrogen metabolites in ...
21 quantitative lc-msms analysis of 15 estrogens and estrogen metabolites in ...CPSA-2012_5-Minutes-Fame
 
Measuring Comparability of Conformation, Heterogeneity and Aggregation with C...
Measuring Comparability of Conformation, Heterogeneity and Aggregation with C...Measuring Comparability of Conformation, Heterogeneity and Aggregation with C...
Measuring Comparability of Conformation, Heterogeneity and Aggregation with C...KBI Biopharma
 
Enzymes in detail can be taught a part of it
Enzymes in detail can be taught a part of itEnzymes in detail can be taught a part of it
Enzymes in detail can be taught a part of itVedpal Yadav
 
2.1 2.4 presentation
2.1 2.4 presentation2.1 2.4 presentation
2.1 2.4 presentationdinomtruck
 
36 qingyu wu_en
36 qingyu wu_en36 qingyu wu_en
36 qingyu wu_enTet Ho
 
3. 정병화식약청 사업단_심포지움_2011
3. 정병화식약청 사업단_심포지움_20113. 정병화식약청 사업단_심포지움_2011
3. 정병화식약청 사업단_심포지움_2011drugmetabol
 
Topic 18 multiple regression
Topic 18 multiple regressionTopic 18 multiple regression
Topic 18 multiple regressionSizwan Ahammed
 
QTA Analysis of Biodiesel Capabilities And Benefits
QTA Analysis of Biodiesel Capabilities And BenefitsQTA Analysis of Biodiesel Capabilities And Benefits
QTA Analysis of Biodiesel Capabilities And Benefitsguest584f763
 
QTA Analysis of Biodiesel: Capabilities And Benefits
QTA Analysis of Biodiesel: Capabilities And BenefitsQTA Analysis of Biodiesel: Capabilities And Benefits
QTA Analysis of Biodiesel: Capabilities And Benefitshalle441
 
Cell Culture Techniques and Best Practices
Cell Culture Techniques and Best PracticesCell Culture Techniques and Best Practices
Cell Culture Techniques and Best PracticesThermo Fisher Scientific
 
Thesis presentation gm dt480.4 p
Thesis presentation gm dt480.4 pThesis presentation gm dt480.4 p
Thesis presentation gm dt480.4 pGavinMDublin
 

Semelhante a Dsc Presentation (Aocs) (13)

21 quantitative lc-msms analysis of 15 estrogens and estrogen metabolites in ...
21 quantitative lc-msms analysis of 15 estrogens and estrogen metabolites in ...21 quantitative lc-msms analysis of 15 estrogens and estrogen metabolites in ...
21 quantitative lc-msms analysis of 15 estrogens and estrogen metabolites in ...
 
Dmt g pday_oct12
Dmt g pday_oct12Dmt g pday_oct12
Dmt g pday_oct12
 
Measuring Comparability of Conformation, Heterogeneity and Aggregation with C...
Measuring Comparability of Conformation, Heterogeneity and Aggregation with C...Measuring Comparability of Conformation, Heterogeneity and Aggregation with C...
Measuring Comparability of Conformation, Heterogeneity and Aggregation with C...
 
PROJECT PHARMACEUTICS
 PROJECT PHARMACEUTICS PROJECT PHARMACEUTICS
PROJECT PHARMACEUTICS
 
Enzymes in detail can be taught a part of it
Enzymes in detail can be taught a part of itEnzymes in detail can be taught a part of it
Enzymes in detail can be taught a part of it
 
2.1 2.4 presentation
2.1 2.4 presentation2.1 2.4 presentation
2.1 2.4 presentation
 
36 qingyu wu_en
36 qingyu wu_en36 qingyu wu_en
36 qingyu wu_en
 
3. 정병화식약청 사업단_심포지움_2011
3. 정병화식약청 사업단_심포지움_20113. 정병화식약청 사업단_심포지움_2011
3. 정병화식약청 사업단_심포지움_2011
 
Topic 18 multiple regression
Topic 18 multiple regressionTopic 18 multiple regression
Topic 18 multiple regression
 
QTA Analysis of Biodiesel Capabilities And Benefits
QTA Analysis of Biodiesel Capabilities And BenefitsQTA Analysis of Biodiesel Capabilities And Benefits
QTA Analysis of Biodiesel Capabilities And Benefits
 
QTA Analysis of Biodiesel: Capabilities And Benefits
QTA Analysis of Biodiesel: Capabilities And BenefitsQTA Analysis of Biodiesel: Capabilities And Benefits
QTA Analysis of Biodiesel: Capabilities And Benefits
 
Cell Culture Techniques and Best Practices
Cell Culture Techniques and Best PracticesCell Culture Techniques and Best Practices
Cell Culture Techniques and Best Practices
 
Thesis presentation gm dt480.4 p
Thesis presentation gm dt480.4 pThesis presentation gm dt480.4 p
Thesis presentation gm dt480.4 p
 

Dsc Presentation (Aocs)

  • 1. Method for Predicting Enzyme Storage Stability in Liquid Surfactant Systems Debbie Winetzky, Louise Wallace & Douglas Dale 99th Annual AOCS Meeting, Seattle, WA 19 May 2008 1
  • 2. Background Need a quick method for predicting the storage stability of enzymes in liquid detergents • Screen a higher number variations faster • Faster feedback than storage stability study • Reduction in time Under utilized Differential Scanning Calorimeter in-house 2
  • 3. Definitions DSC: Differential Scanning Calorimetry • Measures the heat changes that occur during the controlled increase (or decrease) in temperature • It is ideal for evaluating the effects of formulation changes on enzyme stability • pH • Surfactant systems • Builder or buffering systems • Minor ingredients Tm: Thermal transition temperature • The temperature in which 50% of the molecules are in their native, folded state and 50% of the molecules are in a denatured, unfolded state • Changes that increase the Tm lead to improved thermal stability of the enzyme in the formulation http://www.microcal.com/index.php?id=16 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c5/Protein_folding_schematic.png 3
  • 4. DSC is Used in the Pharmaceutical Industry to Develop Formulations for Protein Therapeutics DSC has been shown to be a valuable predictor of liquid formulation stability for proteins and other biological macromolecules (Remmele and Gombotz, Biopharm, June 2000, pp 36-46; Remmele et al, 1998). • Excipients, preservatives, and other additives in the formulation can stabilize or destabilize proteins. • Stabilizing additives increase the Tm of proteins while destabilizing materials have the opposite effect. • DSC is used to determine the stabilizing effects of different solution conditions and additives. Heat capacity changes associated with protein unfolding are primarily due to changes in hydration of side chains that were buried in the native state, but become solvent exposed in the denatured state. http://www.microcal.com/index.php?id=16 4
  • 5. Why Use DSC Instead of Other Instruments? Pros • In-solution method • No purification, separation, or special preparation needed • Useful with turbid, colored or viscous solutions • Not dependent on optical measurements Cons • Low through-put due to the difficultly in loading neat detergents into the cells • Does not measure changes due to other degradation mechanisms • Proteolytic cleavage 5
  • 6. Adiabatic-type DSC How much more heat needs to be supplied to the sample cell to keep it at the same temp as the reference cell? From MicroCal MC-2 User’s Manual 6
  • 7. Pan-type DSC Cylindrical How much more heat needs to be supplied to the sample Cylindrical furnace pan to keep it at the same temp as the reference pan? furnace Reference Pan Sample Pan Base HDL HDL w/ enzyme Thermoelectric Disc Measurement Thermocouples http://hekabe.kt.dtu.dk/~vigild/2005_04_melitek/dsc.htm 7
  • 9. Thermal Measurements Have Little Dependence on Protein Concentration Effect of Protein 0.00050 Protein concentration dependence 72.33306 Concentration on Tm 0.00045 10 mM HEPES, pH 8.0; 0.1 - 4 mg/ml o 200 C/hr 0.00040 0.00035 80.0 0.00030 Cp(cal/ C) buffer 72.01371 0.00025 o 0.1 mg/ml 0.00020 0.2 mg/ml 0.5 mg/ml 60.0 1 mg/ml Tm, °C 0.00015 2 mg/ml 71.5644 0.00010 4 mg/ml 0.00005 71.73301 71.66466 40.0 71.06292 0.00000 -0.00005 20.0 -0.00010 -0.00015 40 50 60 70 80 90 0.0 Temperature ( C) o 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 [Protein], mg/mL Note: A decreasing Tm with increasing protein concentration would indicate aggregation 9
  • 10. DSC Will Rapidly Distinguish Whether A Protein Is Stabilized Or Destabilized Relative To A Control 0.00030 • Loss in enzyme stability = 74.5332 unfolding 69.20858 79.34625 0.00025 • Some factors that may 0.00020 Wild-type Protein A influence enzyme Stable variant of Protein A Destabilized variant of Protein A stability: Cp(cal/ C) 0.00015 • pH o • Ionic strength 0.00010 • Chemical interactions 0.00005 • Oxidation 0.00000 -0.00005 Decreased Increased Stability Stability -0.00010 40 50 60 70 80 90 o Temperature ( C) 10
  • 11. Enzymes Stored in HDL Are Less Thermostable Than Enzymes Stored in Buffer Effect of detergent on protein stability compared with buffer system (pH 8.0) 0.0008 50.3 C o 69.2 oC 0.0006 Cp (cal/ C) 0.0004 o 0.0002 0.0000 -0.0002 40 50 60 70 80 temperature (oC) Protein in detergent 1hr incubation Protein in detergent overnight incubation Protein control in buffer 11
  • 12. DSC: Whole Detergent Effects The Tm of two different enzymes were measured in two detergent bases and buffer to determine if there were stability differences Both enzymes have poorer stability in HDL #2 than in HDL #1 HDL #2 HDL #1 Protease Y Protease X Enzyme in buffer 12
  • 13. Whole Detergent Effects Sample Tm in Tm in Tm in Buffer, °C HDL #1, °C HDL #2, °C Protease X 77.7 72.3 68.7 Alt. Form. A 75.4 71.9 66.9 Alt. Form. B 76.5 71.8 67.3 Alt. Form. C 75.3 71.3 64.7 Protease Y 72.5 66.7 63.2 There are slight differences between the enzyme formulations within a given HDL base The more dramatic effect for all formulations is the difference between the two HDL bases 13
  • 14. DSC: Component Effects Single component changes were made in HDL #2 to help determine which may be causing instability Increasing the hydrotrope concentration decreases stability: Increasing Increasing [hydrotrope] [hydrotrope] Protease X Protease Y 14
  • 15. Component Effects Component Prot X Tm Δ Tm Prot Y Tm Δ Tm HDL #1, pH 9 69.3 - 65.2 - HDL #1, pH 8.4 69.3 0 65.1 -0.1 Alt. Surfactant 67.9 -1.4 64.0 -1.2 Buffer 77.3 - 69.7 - 1.6% Hydrotrope 75.8 -1.5 67.4 -2.3 4.0% Hydrotrope 73.4 -3.9 65.1 -4.6 8.0% Hydrotrope 69.6 -7.7 62.0 -7.7 Results show that changing the surfactant type or increasing the hydrotrope concentration cause a decrease in stability pH is not a factor 15
  • 16. Delta Tm (°C) B -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 as 4.5 e HD L 0. 05 % C a 0. 05 0. % 1% C Protease #4 Protease #3 Protease #2 Protease #1 a; Ca 0. 0 .7 05 % % B C or a, at e on Protease Stability in HDL 0. 7% Fo 0. rm 05 % at e 0. C 05 a, 0. % 1. 4% 05 C % a, PG C 1. 4% a, Effect of Known Stabilizing Components 0. G 7% ly B c er 0. or ol 05 % at e, C 1. a, 4% 0. 7% PG B or at e, G ly c 16
  • 17. Effect of pH and Ions on Thermostability 80.0 78.0 No Ca 2+ 76.0 w/ Ca 2+ 74.0 Tm (°C) 72.0 70.0 68.0 66.0 64.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 pH 17
  • 18. Evaluation of the Thermal Stability of a Protease in Mixtures of Known Stabilizers: Formulations % % % % Run # Glycerol Betaine Formate Water pH Tm (°C) 1 10.0 10.0 0.0 80.0 5.72 72.3 2 0.0 0.0 2.0 98.0 5.74 73.4 3 7.5 7.5 1.5 83.5 5.96 76.8 4 10.0 0.0 1.0 89.0 5.47 75.0 5 2.5 2.5 0.5 94.5 5.59 73.7 6 5.0 5.0 1.0 89.0 5.53 75.6 7 2.5 7.5 1.5 88.5 5.85 76.0 8 0.0 10.0 0.0 90.0 5.70 69.9 9 5.0 5.0 1.0 89.0 5.54 75.6 10 10.0 10.0 2.0 78.0 5.92 79.0 11 7.5 2.5 0.5 89.5 5.49 74.6 12 0.0 0.0 2.0 98.0 5.55 73.4 13 0.0 10.0 0.0 90.0 5.86 69.9 14 10.0 10.0 1.0 79.0 5.72 78.5 18
  • 19. Evaluation of the Stability of a Protease in Mixtures of Known Stabilizers: Correlation Between Tm and Storage Stability Correlation Coefficients: 1 wk r = 0.9569 120.0% 2 wks r = 0.9597 1 wk @ 40°C 5 wks r = 0.9228 100.0% % Activity Remaining 2 wk @ 40°C 80.0% 5 wk @ 40°C 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 -20.0% Tm (°C) 19
  • 20. Conclusion DSC provides a rapid method for assessing • The influence of formulation changes on the thermal stability of an enzyme • The influence of enzyme stabilizers on the thermal stability of an enzyme • The optimum conditions for storage stability Good correlation between Tm and stability measurements Useful method for screening enzyme formulations and detergent formulations for thermal effects that may be indicative of long-term stability 20
  • 21. More Information Microcal: http://www.microcal.com/ TA Instruments: http://www.tainstruments.com/ Setaram: http://www.setaram.com/ General info: http://www.ThermalCal.com/ 21