This document summarizes a research paper exploring the variation in economic recovery rates following displacement-inducing conflicts in different countries. It begins by defining key terms and variables. It then identifies Sierra Leone and Burundi as examples of countries with strong and weak economic recovery, respectively, and examines factors like land tenure that affected their variation. The document also examines northern Uganda's experience after displacement and the role of market development in recovery. It concludes by discussing future research opportunities in better understanding recovery patterns and the impact of policies like market interventions.
2. “We used to have community structures…but all that has died down. Different cultures..when people came together in a camp, mixed up. No one is interested bringing back old strong community structures, and we’re stuck in subsistence farming … Government says the GDP has grown, GNP is doing well, the GTP is doing well. In the commands of some few. The rural people are still in sh--… People have returned, fine…but they’ve just taken their corpses for burial. Most people have lost hope, they cannot live a productive life…that is the big sh-- we’re in [after coming back from the camps].” - Interview, UNICEF-Lira employee, July 2008 Is recovery possible?
3. Despite overall losses, displacement throws up “winners” and “losers” in terms of growth recovery… Research question What causes variation in the rate of growth recovery after displacement- inducing conflict?
4. Part 1: Defining variables Displacement-inducing conflict ● conflict vs. post-conflict ● refugee ● IDP ● durable solutions ● growth recovery Part 2: Identifying and analyzing variation Methodology Strong growth recovery vs. weak growth recovery: Sierra Leone (SGR) and Burundi (WGR) Land tenure and growth Part 3: Developing out of displacement in northern Uganda Part 4: Market development after displacement-inducing conflict To redistribute or not redistribute: Can you address inequality and poverty reduction while promoting economic growth after conflict? Land tenure and market development—in the short run and long run Developing out of displacement
6. Displacement-inducing agents: conflict (political violence), development projects, disasters, environmental* Causes of displacement-inducing conflict: Breaches in local, personal security: government terror, dissident violence, civil wars, and international wars on a territory (Moore and Shellman 2004) Voluntary and involuntary migrants: who’s forced? UNHCR, national governments and international community determine and define their constituency, despite problematic nature of distinction History of the refugee (1945-); IDPs (2000-) Durable solutions to displacement: return, resettlement, and reintegration (refugee flows and IDPs) Definitions and identities Conflict, displacement, and durable solutions
7. From conflict to “post-conflict”: developing a typology for indicating transition to “post-conflict” scenario UNDP 2008 Report on Post-Conflict Growth Recovery Criteria: Post-war annual GDP per capita growth averages of 2% or higher Higher average post-conflict growth rate than pre-conflict growth rate Strong growth recovery (SGR) countries: Weak growth recovery (WGR) countries: Micro-foundations of human migration and conflict, complemented with macro-level analysis Defining Growth Recovery
9. Economic and historical analysis of a SGR and WGR country during and after conflict Michael Cernea’s Implementation Risks and Reconstruction (IRR) Model – understanding the effects of displacement Qualitative analysis Variation of rate of growth recovery in country case studies Variation in growth recovery across post-camp northern Uganda Independent variables: Methodology
10. Information from Doyle and Sambanis (2000) dataset on civil wars; UNDP 2008 Report – SGR and WGR; World Bank DDP Query; IMF DataMapper®; UNHCR Statistical Yearbooks 1994-2007 Dataset Country cases entering into post-conflict “transition” after 1990 Average GDP per capita annual percent growth rate Stock number of UNHCR-assisted displaced persons (refugees and IDPs) from 1990-2008 (per thousand population) Case selection
14. History – Economic Conflict History Disp. History IRR Analysis Sierra Leone
15. Camp Displacement and Demographic Composition of Resettled Communities – Ex-combatants and DDR Natural, physical, human, and social capital recovery—land tenure systems Variation in Growth Recovery
16. Part Three:Developing out of displacement in northern Uganda History, displacement, and growth Land tenure reform? Recommendations for Ugandan government and NGOs 1. Macro-level, deductive observations by international, nonstate actors must be complemented with adequate ___ of micro-level foundations of displacement-inducing conflict. How organizations define people and places must more closelyt describe how things are; affects how Lira, Uganda, outside of Sankofa CafeDecember 2010
17. History Conflict Patterns 1 Conflict Patterns 2 Conflict Patterns 3 Displacement Patterns of conflict and displacement
18. Camp closure and phaseout Economic profile of Lira, northern Uganda in general Land tenure reform? Addressing inequality and growth Heading toward SGR or WGR?
19. Part Four:MarketDevelopment after displacement-inducingconflict To redistribute or not redistribute? Growth recovery and market development—toward “peace economies” Frameworks for market development Land tenure and market development Summary Future Research Kampala, Uganda, outside of IOM’s headoffice | December 2010
20. Basic macroeconomics: developing countries must focus on growth first, and then mechanisms for redistribution Increasing the pie increase individual slices Commitment issues Effects of displacement and conflict: loss of assets, skills, and productivity; damage of infrastructure and former market networks Is it possible to address inequality while promoting economic growth? Northern Uganda and Southern Uganda Addressing inequality and Growth
21. Growth important in order to have any peace: Market development to promote peace—towards “peace economies” Peacebuilding and economic recovery Framework for developing market development programmes that do not aggravate causes of conflict: Value Chain Framework: Understanding national supply and demand between suppliers and buyers and determining governance structures Making Markets Work for the Poor (M4P): Increasing incomes and enabling scale, sustainability and systemic market change Bottom of the Pyramid (BoP): Developing scalable products and services that work for the poor Social Enterprise: Inserting social enterprises into critical gaps in the market Growth Recovery and market development
22. Land tenure reform functions in Value Chain Framework Short-term effects in Sierra Leone, possible solutions to landlessness in northern Uganda and variation in growth recovery Tailoring market development strategies to peacebuilding initiatives Political economy of each conflict, identities of actors involved, and pre- and post-conflict market analyses matter Ultimately, increased growth will only occur with changes in incentives (Easterly) Land Tenure Reform and market Development: Panacea?
23.
24. Definitions are necessary, but can both ameliorate and suffocate.
32. Fiscal policy and government interventions are necessary.
33.
34. Professor David Abernethy and Jeremy Weinstein Professor Stephen Stedman (International Policy Studies/CISAC), GiliDrori (Sociology), Jennifer Wolf (Human Biology), Eric Morris (International Policy Studies), Ian Robertson (Archaeology) Professor Larry Diamond and Kathryn Stoner-Weiss (CDDRL Honors Program) Refugee Law Project (Moses Okello) Samaritan’s Purse Uganda Nic Cheeseman (Oxford Center on African Studies) Acknowledgements
35. Organizations: Yumiko Takashima/UNHCR, UNICEF, UN-OHCHR, IOM, Save the Children Uganda, UNDP, UN OCHA, World Food Programme, WHO, UNDP, Uganda Bureau of Statistics Daniel Othieno, Office of the Prime Minister, Lira District Funding: Chappell-Lougee, UAR Major Grant, Haas Center Program on Philanthropy and Civil Society (PACS), CDDRL Brian and Susan Davis, Chris and Jodi Blackham, Dale and Marika Christy, Ben and Holly Porter Michael Wilkerson, Jeff Love, Melina Platas All of my friends (and Meyer Library) who helped me endure until the end (CDDRL Honors Program, Bertram Ang, Jason Brown, Sidney Le, Sabrina Pol, Adrian Bonifacio, etc.) Acknowledgements
Editor's Notes
Ultimately, all migrants are motivated by a mixture of economic and political factors, and therefore the definition of forced migration rests not on a unique quality of the experiences of “forced” migrants, but rather on an external determination and acknowledgment of rights originating from the collection of humanitarian state and international non-state actors (or the international humanitarian system). The distinction between voluntary and involuntary migrants reflects categories of people whose basic rights states or non-state actors are either willing or unwilling to provide; in a struggling developing economy, the proliferation of migrants threatened by structural constraints and in search of a more secure future may prove either too much for actors to respond to or too excessive for public actors such as NGOs to support “private ventures” and continue to receive funding from their donors. External actors in the international humanitarian system therefore determine and define their constituency in accordance to their individual mandates, despite the “problematic nature of the distinction” created. These definitions may not be reflective of their actual experiences or identities, and may limit our understanding of actual dynamics of displacement and its effects.
Another issue involving definitions: conflict vs. post-conflict in econometric studies on civil war and other studiesUltimately, post-conflict economic recovery can be more accurately regarded as complete “when the main features of an economy no longer stem from the war but from the normal conditions of the economy,” which includes both phases of recession and expansion. As an international organization, UNHCR largely observes forced migration as a "macro-structural" issue, as opposed to "one highlighting the micro-foundations of the individual decisions that produced refugees [and other displaced persons]." At the macro-level, displaced persons are essentially "stimulus-responded mechanisms"; at the micro-level, these persons retain a choice to stay and understanding micro-foundations are important in understanding both displacement and its effects. While the latter is often invisible in the literature's descriptions of "flows" and "streams" of displaced persons and, argued by Davenport et al. (2003), should complement macro-level definitions and research. While Davenport et. al (2003) do not contend that all scholarship "embrace methodological individualism," they argue that "developing a theory with micro-foundations is important in this area of inquiry." This study attempts to incorporate both macro- and micro-foundations, utilizing a macro-level analysis related to displacement and growth recovery across country cases, as well as incorporating micro-level analysis that produces “hypotheses about macro-level observables.”Davenport et al, "Sometimes You Just Have to Leave: Domestic Threats and Forced Migration, 1964-1989," p30.
Land as an asset; displacement caused a combination of natural, physical, human, and social capital loss
From the previous points above, it would seem probable that countries with high stock numbers of displaced persons would be strongly correlated with low growth, with relatively little variation across countries; in addition to human rights abuses, civil war, and other displacement-inducing factors from Shellman’s analysis, the displacement of refugees into and out of a country has been strongly evidenced to correlate with low growth, and these countries often do not recover to pre-conflict levels. Sierra Leone and Burundi: most similar casesAfrican continent continues to be the main theater for displacement in the 21st century. Similar range of conflict, extent of human rights abuses (child soldiers, mutilation, etc.), and threshold of displacement