This document provides guidance for analyzing sources and drafting a paper. It begins by establishing the goal of developing expertise as a reading teacher and writer. It then outlines the components of a successful paper, including an introduction with a clear thesis, objective synthesis using third person and citations, and headings to aid organization. Guidance is given on writing techniques like varying phrasing when citing multiple sources and using minimal direct quotes. Strict rules are outlined for formatting references and incorporating citations within the paper. Deadlines are established for drafts, peer reviews, revisions, and final submission.
6. Analyze the Matrix
• Consistencies, inconsistencies, and patterns
• What should your reader know about your
topic? Tell your reader what your articles say.
Be an expert!
• Navigation article sample coded matrix
9. Introduction
• Get your reader on the “right planet.” What
are you talking about?
• Usually one or two paragraphs.
• Include a thesis/purpose statement in the
introduction.
• Tell your reader what is coming next.
10. First or Third Person?
• SYNTHESIS: THIRD person
– Report what is “out there” on your topic – you’re
not part of this portion of your paper.
– Objective
– They, educators, teachers, them, he, she, etc.
• REFLECTION: FIRST person.
– This is about YOU!
– Subjective
– I, we, me, us, etc.
11. Headings
• Use headings to help your reader understand
the organization of the paper and follow your
writing.
• http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/
560/16/
12. How to write in APA about what other people
have written about.
• Butcher (2006) stated…
• Smith and Jones (2009) posit…
• Keeting (2008) found…
• Billings (1999) and Yinley (2001) recommend…
• Miles, Yinley, and Zhang (1999) suggest…
13. Change it Up
• Many researchers posit … (Geurney, 2009; Smith &
Roberston, 2006; Yang & Zhang, 1999).
• Research has demonstrated … (Kuhn & Stahl, 2003;
Rasinski & Hoffman, 2003)
• Some researchers recommend … (Billings,1999; Yinley,
2001).
• Research suggests … (Rasinski, 2006; Samuels, 2007).
15. • Butcher (2006) stated…
– The author said something
• Smith and Jones (2009) posit…
– The authors said something or theorize something
• Keeting (2008) found…
– Results from the author’s study are…
• Billings (1999) and Yinley (2001) recommend…
– These authors recommend something based on the
findings of their study.
• Miles, Yinley, and Zhang (1999) suggest…
16. Change it Up
• Many researchers posit … (Geurney, 2009; Smith &
Roberston, 2006; Yang & Zhang, 1999).
– These researchers claim that …
• Research has demonstrated … (Kuhn & Stahl, 2003;
Rasinski & Hoffman, 2003)
– Results from several studies show …
• Some researchers recommend … (Billings,1999; Yinley,
2001).
– These authors recommend something based on the
findings of their study.
• Research suggests … (Rasinski, 2006; Samuels, 2007).
– These research studies suggest these implications …
17. Direct Quotes
Use a Minimum amount of direct
quotes; better to paraphrase
If you do use quotes:
Swaggerty (2013) explains that “snow skiing is super-
dee-duper fun” (p. X).
Snow skiing is “super-dee-duper fun” (Swaggerty, 2013,
p. X).
If your quote is more than 40 words,
there are special rules to follow:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/
560/02/
18. References
• Ref list starts on a separate page.
• All references in your ref list should be cited
within your paper, and vice-versa.
• Make sure ref list is in ABC order. Don’t
change order of authors for an article, though.
• USE THESE LINKS (notice the links on the left
related to references):
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/10/
21. • March 26: Draft Due; Peer Conference #1
• April 2: Revise and Complete Draft; Peer
Conference #2 ; Writing Center Consultation
Due on April 4th
• April 9: Final Paper and Project Link Due
• April 16: Project Presentations
• April 23: Project Presentations
• May 5: Final Exam (8-10:30)
If you’ve done a good job on the matrix, you’re ready to look for consistencices, inconsistencies, and patterns in your articles. First, though, you’ve got to think about the type of article – is the article sharing findings or advice? Make sure you’re looking through the right lens. If several of your articles seem to say the same thing, look closer! What are the details/intricacies? Remember, you are becoming an expert on this topic. Show theme indentification for navigation article. ACTIVITY: SORT LEGOS!!!!!!
Caitlin’s ideas about switching modes … from computer to paper and pencil.
Develop a working thesis statement: a rough idea of your topic and the important point you want to make about that topic. Write it at the top of a rough draft or outline and look at it often to keep you focused throughout the essay. NOTE: the thesis statement that you begin with is not set in stone. If you find that your essay shifts topic slightly, you can change your thesis in later drafts so that it matches your new focus.
In your paper, include a statement or two in the first paragraph that make it obvious what the paper is about.
What do you notice about all of these sentences pulled from synthesis papers?
-last names only
-pub year in parentheses
-there can be more than one article saying the same thing
Verbs?
Researcher names aren’t in the sentence, but in the parenthetical citations.
Youi can put more than one in parentheses.
Punctuation
Ampersand instead of “and.”