1. Sustainable Development of SEZ’S Tanmay Tathagat & Sachin Rastogi Environmental Design Soultions Environmental Design Solutions

2. Integrated Design Approach 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions Sustainable Development Partners Building Owners Builders/Contractors Manufacturers Architects/Engineers Building Users

3. Integrated Design for Sustainability 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions

14. 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions CASE STUDY 2: MAYTAS HILL COUNTY Electrical End-use Totals (kWh) The Proposed case building incorporating various energy efficiency measures shows 55.8 % energy savings per year or 22,696,140 KWh per year over the Typical building. Table : Electrical Use Summary-Typical Case and Proposed Case buildings Alternative Lights Equip. Heating Cooling Tower Pumps Fans Ext. Lights Ext. Equip. Total % savings over Typical Bldg Typical Bldg 7,295,505 5,531,316 581,694 8,734,920 2,964,039 525,416 12,417,600 21,076 2,595,888 40,667,460 Optimized Bldg 4,615,356 5,531,316 32,422 2,834,260 1,094,936 365,516 880,552 21,076 2,595,888 17,971,320 55.8%

15. 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions The proposed case showed an energy saving of 22.34 % over the ASHRAE Budget building The proposed building is able to achieve 39.39% gas savings over the ASHRAE Budget building. CASE STUDY 3: METROVALLEY S. No. Energy Conservation Measure Lighting Equipment Cooling Tower Secondary Pumps Fans Total Energy Use (kWh/Yr) Saving over typical base building 1 Typical Base Case 4,755,598 7,133,508 7,264,992 4,168,708 15,192 1,059,655 24,397,650 2 Proposed Case 3,804,644 7,133,508 4,830,557 2,216,965 7,067 952,824 18,945,560 22.34% Alternative Heating Hot Water Total Ashrae Base Case - Natural Gas (Therm) 62,986 432 63,418 Proposed case - Natural Gas (Therm) 38,003 432 38,435 Savings Over Base Case 39.30%

16. Thanks www.edsglobal.com 15 June 09 Environmental Design Solutions