Enviar pesquisa
Carregar
Bs 8100 3-1999
•
17 gostaram
•
5,078 visualizações
D
dominated_2008
Seguir
Negócios
Tecnologia
Denunciar
Compartilhar
Denunciar
Compartilhar
1 de 32
Recomendados
Surface Structures, including SAP2000
Surface Structures, including SAP2000
Wolfgang Schueller
Tower design using etabs- Nada Zarrak
Tower design using etabs- Nada Zarrak
Nada Zarrak
CSI ETABS & SAFE MANUAL: Slab Analysis and Design to EC2
CSI ETABS & SAFE MANUAL: Slab Analysis and Design to EC2
Eur Ing Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc, CEng MICE
ETABS manual - Seismic design of steel buildings according to Eurocode 3 & 8
ETABS manual - Seismic design of steel buildings according to Eurocode 3 & 8
Eur Ing Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc, CEng MICE
EC3 MANUAL FOR SAP2000
EC3 MANUAL FOR SAP2000
Muhammad Wazim Akram
Lec09 Shear in RC Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Abdelhamid Charif)
Lec09 Shear in RC Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Abdelhamid Charif)
Hossam Shafiq II
Deep beam
Deep beam
Vikas Mehta
Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS - Rahul Leslie
Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS - Rahul Leslie
Rahul Leslie
Recomendados
Surface Structures, including SAP2000
Surface Structures, including SAP2000
Wolfgang Schueller
Tower design using etabs- Nada Zarrak
Tower design using etabs- Nada Zarrak
Nada Zarrak
CSI ETABS & SAFE MANUAL: Slab Analysis and Design to EC2
CSI ETABS & SAFE MANUAL: Slab Analysis and Design to EC2
Eur Ing Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc, CEng MICE
ETABS manual - Seismic design of steel buildings according to Eurocode 3 & 8
ETABS manual - Seismic design of steel buildings according to Eurocode 3 & 8
Eur Ing Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc, CEng MICE
EC3 MANUAL FOR SAP2000
EC3 MANUAL FOR SAP2000
Muhammad Wazim Akram
Lec09 Shear in RC Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Abdelhamid Charif)
Lec09 Shear in RC Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Abdelhamid Charif)
Hossam Shafiq II
Deep beam
Deep beam
Vikas Mehta
Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS - Rahul Leslie
Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS - Rahul Leslie
Rahul Leslie
Design methods for torsional buckling of steel structures
Design methods for torsional buckling of steel structures
Begum Emte Ajom
Guide for the design of crane supporting steel structures
Guide for the design of crane supporting steel structures
Timóteo Rocha
STAAD.Pro_Trg_Course_Material
STAAD.Pro_Trg_Course_Material
VAIBHAV JAIN
Part 3 Guy Tower Structure
Part 3 Guy Tower Structure
Fred Teichman
transmission line tower design
transmission line tower design
kunalbhattgecd
Etabs modeling - Design of slab according to EC2
Etabs modeling - Design of slab according to EC2
Eur Ing Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc, CEng MICE
Chapter02.structural design using staad pro
Chapter02.structural design using staad pro
devaraj pavan kumar
Tower design-Chapter 2-pile caps design
Tower design-Chapter 2-pile caps design
Nada Zarrak
CE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column Design
CE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column Design
Fawad Najam
CE 72.52 - Lecture 7 - Strut and Tie Models
CE 72.52 - Lecture 7 - Strut and Tie Models
Fawad Najam
Book for Beginners, RCC Design by ETABS
Book for Beginners, RCC Design by ETABS
Yousuf Dinar
Deep beams
Deep beams
Vikas Mehta
Eurocode 2 design of composite concrete
Eurocode 2 design of composite concrete
Jo Gijbels
CE 72.52 Lecture 4 - Ductility of Cross-sections
CE 72.52 Lecture 4 - Ductility of Cross-sections
Fawad Najam
Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode II
Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode II
ijtsrd
analysis and design of telecommunication tower
analysis and design of telecommunication tower
Rohithasangaraju
Etabs (atkins)
Etabs (atkins)
Albert deGuzman
AITC Coupling Beam Design Procedure (20151106)
AITC Coupling Beam Design Procedure (20151106)
Fawad Najam
TRUSS ANALYSIS (TERM PAPER REPORT)
TRUSS ANALYSIS (TERM PAPER REPORT)
Sunil Kumar
T beam TYPES
T beam TYPES
babji syed
Value Proposition canvas- Customer needs and pains
Value Proposition canvas- Customer needs and pains
P&CO
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
anilsa9823
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais procurados
Design methods for torsional buckling of steel structures
Design methods for torsional buckling of steel structures
Begum Emte Ajom
Guide for the design of crane supporting steel structures
Guide for the design of crane supporting steel structures
Timóteo Rocha
STAAD.Pro_Trg_Course_Material
STAAD.Pro_Trg_Course_Material
VAIBHAV JAIN
Part 3 Guy Tower Structure
Part 3 Guy Tower Structure
Fred Teichman
transmission line tower design
transmission line tower design
kunalbhattgecd
Etabs modeling - Design of slab according to EC2
Etabs modeling - Design of slab according to EC2
Eur Ing Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc, CEng MICE
Chapter02.structural design using staad pro
Chapter02.structural design using staad pro
devaraj pavan kumar
Tower design-Chapter 2-pile caps design
Tower design-Chapter 2-pile caps design
Nada Zarrak
CE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column Design
CE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column Design
Fawad Najam
CE 72.52 - Lecture 7 - Strut and Tie Models
CE 72.52 - Lecture 7 - Strut and Tie Models
Fawad Najam
Book for Beginners, RCC Design by ETABS
Book for Beginners, RCC Design by ETABS
Yousuf Dinar
Deep beams
Deep beams
Vikas Mehta
Eurocode 2 design of composite concrete
Eurocode 2 design of composite concrete
Jo Gijbels
CE 72.52 Lecture 4 - Ductility of Cross-sections
CE 72.52 Lecture 4 - Ductility of Cross-sections
Fawad Najam
Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode II
Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode II
ijtsrd
analysis and design of telecommunication tower
analysis and design of telecommunication tower
Rohithasangaraju
Etabs (atkins)
Etabs (atkins)
Albert deGuzman
AITC Coupling Beam Design Procedure (20151106)
AITC Coupling Beam Design Procedure (20151106)
Fawad Najam
TRUSS ANALYSIS (TERM PAPER REPORT)
TRUSS ANALYSIS (TERM PAPER REPORT)
Sunil Kumar
T beam TYPES
T beam TYPES
babji syed
Mais procurados
(20)
Design methods for torsional buckling of steel structures
Design methods for torsional buckling of steel structures
Guide for the design of crane supporting steel structures
Guide for the design of crane supporting steel structures
STAAD.Pro_Trg_Course_Material
STAAD.Pro_Trg_Course_Material
Part 3 Guy Tower Structure
Part 3 Guy Tower Structure
transmission line tower design
transmission line tower design
Etabs modeling - Design of slab according to EC2
Etabs modeling - Design of slab according to EC2
Chapter02.structural design using staad pro
Chapter02.structural design using staad pro
Tower design-Chapter 2-pile caps design
Tower design-Chapter 2-pile caps design
CE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column Design
CE 72.52 - Lecture 5 - Column Design
CE 72.52 - Lecture 7 - Strut and Tie Models
CE 72.52 - Lecture 7 - Strut and Tie Models
Book for Beginners, RCC Design by ETABS
Book for Beginners, RCC Design by ETABS
Deep beams
Deep beams
Eurocode 2 design of composite concrete
Eurocode 2 design of composite concrete
CE 72.52 Lecture 4 - Ductility of Cross-sections
CE 72.52 Lecture 4 - Ductility of Cross-sections
Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode II
Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode II
analysis and design of telecommunication tower
analysis and design of telecommunication tower
Etabs (atkins)
Etabs (atkins)
AITC Coupling Beam Design Procedure (20151106)
AITC Coupling Beam Design Procedure (20151106)
TRUSS ANALYSIS (TERM PAPER REPORT)
TRUSS ANALYSIS (TERM PAPER REPORT)
T beam TYPES
T beam TYPES
Último
Value Proposition canvas- Customer needs and pains
Value Proposition canvas- Customer needs and pains
P&CO
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
anilsa9823
unwanted pregnancy Kit [+918133066128] Abortion Pills IN Dubai UAE Abudhabi
unwanted pregnancy Kit [+918133066128] Abortion Pills IN Dubai UAE Abudhabi
Abortion pills in Kuwait Cytotec pills in Kuwait
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Mahipalpur Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Mahipalpur Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
dollysharma2066
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
ritikaroy0888
RSA Conference Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
RSA Conference Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
Exhibitors Data
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Dipal Arora
Monthly Social Media Update April 2024 pptx.pptx
Monthly Social Media Update April 2024 pptx.pptx
Andy Lambert
Organizational Transformation Lead with Culture
Organizational Transformation Lead with Culture
Seta Wicaksana
Famous Olympic Siblings from the 21st Century
Famous Olympic Siblings from the 21st Century
rwgiffor
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.
Aaiza Hassan
MONA 98765-12871 CALL GIRLS IN LUDHIANA LUDHIANA CALL GIRL
MONA 98765-12871 CALL GIRLS IN LUDHIANA LUDHIANA CALL GIRL
Seo
Yaroslav Rozhankivskyy: Три складові і три передумови максимальної продуктивн...
Yaroslav Rozhankivskyy: Три складові і три передумови максимальної продуктивн...
Lviv Startup Club
John Halpern sued for sexual assault.pdf
John Halpern sued for sexual assault.pdf
AmzadHosen3
VIP Call Girls In Saharaganj ( Lucknow ) 🔝 8923113531 🔝 Cash Payment (COD) 👒
VIP Call Girls In Saharaganj ( Lucknow ) 🔝 8923113531 🔝 Cash Payment (COD) 👒
anilsa9823
HONOR Veterans Event Keynote by Michael Hawkins
HONOR Veterans Event Keynote by Michael Hawkins
Michael W. Hawkins
B.COM Unit – 4 ( CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ( CSR ).pptx
B.COM Unit – 4 ( CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ( CSR ).pptx
priyanshujha201
👉Chandigarh Call Girls 👉9878799926👉Just Call👉Chandigarh Call Girl In Chandiga...
👉Chandigarh Call Girls 👉9878799926👉Just Call👉Chandigarh Call Girl In Chandiga...
rajveerescorts2022
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Servi...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Servi...
amitlee9823
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Ravindra Nath Shukla
Último
(20)
Value Proposition canvas- Customer needs and pains
Value Proposition canvas- Customer needs and pains
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
unwanted pregnancy Kit [+918133066128] Abortion Pills IN Dubai UAE Abudhabi
unwanted pregnancy Kit [+918133066128] Abortion Pills IN Dubai UAE Abudhabi
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Mahipalpur Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Mahipalpur Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
RSA Conference Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
RSA Conference Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Monthly Social Media Update April 2024 pptx.pptx
Monthly Social Media Update April 2024 pptx.pptx
Organizational Transformation Lead with Culture
Organizational Transformation Lead with Culture
Famous Olympic Siblings from the 21st Century
Famous Olympic Siblings from the 21st Century
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.
MONA 98765-12871 CALL GIRLS IN LUDHIANA LUDHIANA CALL GIRL
MONA 98765-12871 CALL GIRLS IN LUDHIANA LUDHIANA CALL GIRL
Yaroslav Rozhankivskyy: Три складові і три передумови максимальної продуктивн...
Yaroslav Rozhankivskyy: Три складові і три передумови максимальної продуктивн...
John Halpern sued for sexual assault.pdf
John Halpern sued for sexual assault.pdf
VIP Call Girls In Saharaganj ( Lucknow ) 🔝 8923113531 🔝 Cash Payment (COD) 👒
VIP Call Girls In Saharaganj ( Lucknow ) 🔝 8923113531 🔝 Cash Payment (COD) 👒
HONOR Veterans Event Keynote by Michael Hawkins
HONOR Veterans Event Keynote by Michael Hawkins
B.COM Unit – 4 ( CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ( CSR ).pptx
B.COM Unit – 4 ( CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ( CSR ).pptx
👉Chandigarh Call Girls 👉9878799926👉Just Call👉Chandigarh Call Girl In Chandiga...
👉Chandigarh Call Girls 👉9878799926👉Just Call👉Chandigarh Call Girl In Chandiga...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Servi...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Servi...
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Bs 8100 3-1999
1.
| BS 8100-3:1999 BRITISH
STANDARD | | | | Incorporating | | Corrigendum No. 1 | | | | | | | | | | | Lattice towers and | | | | | | masts Ð | | | | | | | | | Part 3: Code of practice for strength | | | assessment of members of lattice towers | | | and masts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ICS 91.080.10 | | | | | | | | | NO COPYING WITHOUT BSI PERMISSION EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW | | | |
2.
BS 8100-3:1999
Committees responsible for this British Standard The preparation of this British Standard was entrusted by Technical Committee B/525, Building and civil enginnering structures, to Subcommittee B/525/32, Towers and masts, upon which the following bodies were represented: British Telecommunications plc Department of Trade and Industry (Electricity Department) Institution of Civil Engineers Meteorological Office Ministry of Defence National Transcommunications Ltd Steel Construction Institute UK Steel Association This British Standard, having been prepared under the direction of the Building and Civil Amendments issued since publication Engineering Sector Committee, was published under the Amd. No. Date Comments authority of the Standards Committee and comes into effect on 15 September 1999 12097 March 2001 Indicated by a sideline Corrigendum © BSI 03-2001 No. 1 The following BSI references relate to the work on this standard: Committee reference B/525/32 Draft for comment 97/10168 DC ISBN 0 580 33033 8
3.
BS 8100-3:1999
Contents Page Committees responsible Inside front cover Foreword ii Introduction 1 1 Scope 1 2 Normative references 1 3 Definitions and symbols 1 4 Axes of members 3 5 Structural configurations, system length and effective slenderness 3 6 Calculation of design strength for members in compression 15 7 Calculation of resistance of members in tension 17 8 Bolted connections 17 9 Mast guy assemblies 20 Annex A (informative) Design of battens 24 Annex B (informative) Terminations commonly used for guys 24 Annex C (informative) Erection tolerances for guyed masts 25 Bibliography 26 Figure 1 Ð Typical cable construction 2 Figure 2 Ð Dimensions and axes of sections 4 Figure 3 Ð Cruciform angle sections 5 Figure 4 Ð Typical bracing patterns 6 Figure 5 Ð Use of secondary bracing systems 7 Figure 6 Ð Typical plan bracing 9 Figure 7 Ð K bracing horizontals without plan bracing 9 Figure 8 Ð Cranked K bracing 10 Figure 9 Ð Portal frame 10 Figure 10 Ð Location of bolts 19 Table 1 Ð Applied force as percentage of leg load, F 11 Table 2 Ð Effective slenderness factor K for leg members 13 Table 3 Ð Effective slenderness factor K for bracing members 14 Table 4 Ð Factor K1 for horizontal of K brace (without plan bracing) 15 Table 5 Ð Imperfection factors 15 Table 6 Ð Reduction factors x 16 Table 7 Ð Selection of buckling curve for a cross-section 18 Table 8 Ð Relationships between flange, tube and bolts 19 Table 9 Ð Range of modulus of elasticity for steel wire guys 21 Table B.1 Ð Static tensile efficiencies of terminations 25 © BSI 03-2001 i
4.
BS 8100-3:1999
Foreword This part of BS 8100 has been prepared under the direction of Technical Committee B/525, Building and civil engineering structures. BS 8100 is a series of standards combining codes of practice with a guide covering the loading and design of lattice towers and masts of metallic construction. It comprises the following parts: Ð Part 1: Code of practice for loading; Ð Part 2: Guide to the background and use of Part 1: ªCode of practice for loadingº; Ð Part 3: Code of practice for strength assessment of members of lattice towers and masts; Ð Part 4: Code of practice for loading of guyed masts. This part of BS 8100 incorporates clauses to complement BS 8100-4. The need for this code of practice to give guidance on the determination of the strength of lattice towers and masts arises out of the difficulty in applying consistently the general structural strength codes to these often tall, slender three dimensional lattice structures. The document is based upon DD 133:1986, which in turn brought together the collective experience of the European transmission line tower industry, where each new design of structure was subjected to full-scale ªtypeº testing. It was considered invaluable to have such relatively unique data built into a code as well as enabling the limit state loading rules to be accurately calibrated. The additional clauses dealing with the special aspects of guyed masts represent the collective extensive experience of the drafting committee. It is considered that they will provide efficient solutions to the strength assessment problem, whilst avoiding some of the causes of problems which have occurred on this type of structure. By liaison with the relevant Eurocode drafting team, the rules drafted into this code of practice have been based upon a common approach and should result in the minimum amount of variation when the National Application Document is prepared following the issue of the ENV. This part of BS 8100 does not apply to other metallic structures. Other British Standards exist for some of those structures. It has been assumed in the drafting of this British Standard that the execution of its provisions will be entrusted to appropriately qualified and experienced people. As a code of practice, this British Standard takes the form of guidance and recommendations. It should not be quoted as if it were a specification and particular care should be taken to ensure that claims of compliance are not misleading. Annex A, annex B and annex C are informative. A British Standard does not purport to include all the necessary provisions of a contract. Users of British Standards are responsible for their correct application. Compliance with a British Standard does not of itself confer immunity from legal obligations. Summary of pages This document comprises a front cover, an inside front cover, pages i and ii, pages 1 to 26, an inside back cover and a back cover. The BSI copyright notice displayed in this document indicates when the document was last issued. Sidelining in this document indicates the most recent changes by amendment. ii © BSI 03-2001
5.
BS 8100-3:1999 Introduction
BS 4429, Specification for rigging screws and turnbuckles for general engineering, lifting purposes The strengths given in this part of BS 8100 are and pipe hanger applications. characteristic (95 % probability) values for use with BS 8100-1 and -4. The design strengths are obtained BS 5950-1:1990, Structural use of steelwork in by dividing the characteristic strengths by the building Ð Part 1: Code of practice for design in appropriate partial factor gm defined in this part. simple and continuous construction: hot rolled sections. Connection eccentricities assumed in this part of BS 8100 are those that are traditionally applied to BS 6994, Specification for steel shackles for lifting lattice masts and towers in the UK. and general engineering purposes: grade M(4). BS 7035, Code of practice for socketing of stranded steel wire ropes. 1 Scope This part of BS 8100 provides guidance on the 3 Definitions and symbols assessment of the strength of members and connections for masts and towers of lattice 3.1 Definitions construction consisting mainly of bolted, rivetted or For the purposes of this part of BS 8100 the welded steel angle or tubular or solid round sections. following definitions apply. The recommendations given are valid for both equal 3.1.1 and unequal angles, either rolled or cold formed, compound members fabricated from these sections, leg members tubular members and solid rounds. members forming the main load bearing chords of The specific components covered in this part of the structure BS 8100 are: 3.1.2 a) compression members and bolted and/or primary bracing members welded connections which are specific to typical members other than legs carrying the shear force mast and tower configurations and which are not due to imposed loads on the structure comprehensively covered in general strength 3.1.3 codes; secondary members b) mast guys, their fittings and assemblies. For such components their strength is closely related members used to reduce the effective length of the to practical considerations, and such guidance is main legs and sometimes that of the bracing. They included where relevant. are normally considered unstressed and are only loaded due to deformation of the structure (see 5.4.) NOTE 1 Information on all other aspects of strength assessment can be obtained from BS 5950-1. Information for fatigue NOTE Secondary members are sometimes referred to as assessment can be obtained from BS 7608. redundant members. 3.1.4 2 Normative references system length The following normative documents contain taken as the geometric length of a member between provisions which, through reference in this text, intersection points providing restraint in the relevant constitute provisions of this part of this British plane Standard. For dated references, subsequent 3.1.5 mast guy assemblies amendments to, or revisions of, any of these 3.1.5.1 publications do not apply. For undated references, the latest edition of the publication referred to guy applies. tension only member which provides horizontal BS 302 (all parts), Stranded steel wire ropes. support to the mast column at discrete levels. The lower end of the guy assembly is anchored to the BS 443, Specification for testing zinc coatings on ground and normally incorporates a means of steel wire and for quality requirements. adjusting the tension in the guy BS 463, Specification for sockets for steel wire ropes. NOTE The terms ªstayº and ªguyº are interchangeable but in this BS 643, Specification for white metal ingots for British Standard the word ªguyº has been used throughout. capping steel wire ropes. 3.1.5.2 BS 1554, Specification for stainless and wire heat-resisting steel round wire. individual filament of steel, forming the smallest BS 2763, Specification for round carbon steel wire single tension component in a cable, usually circular for wire ropes. in cross section with a diameter between 3 mm and 8 mm, with a high strength that is usually obtained by cold drawing or cold rolling © BSI 03-2001 1
6.
BS 8100-3:1999 3.1.5.3
3.1.5.7 spiral strand parallel wire strand assembly of round wires formed helically around a assembly of wires laid side by side in parallel and centre wire in one or more symmetrical layers either bound tightly together or with the spaces NOTE Each successive layer is wound in alternate directions between the wires held constant by spacer elements [see Figure 1a)]. 3.1.5.4 3.1.5.8 wire rope core assembly of spiral strands wound helically around a central foundation for the strands, providing support centre core, normally in the opposite direction to the and keeping them in their proper position outer layer of the strands [see Figure 1b)] throughout the life of the rope 3.1.5.5 NOTE Fibre cores impregnated with grease are used to provide internal lubrication of moving ropes. However, only steel wire cable cores should be used for mast guys. assembly of one or more strands or ropes of the 3.1.5.9 types described in 3.1.5.3 and 3.1.5.4 NOTE The strands may be bound in tight contact or kept apart termination by spacers. [See Figure 1c).] device fixed to the ends of a cable, strand or wire to 3.1.5.6 enable the loads to be transferred between it and the locked coil mast column or the steelwork attached to the guy strand comprising a central core of round wires, foundation spirally bound with layers of shaped wires NOTE The inner layers of shaped wires are sometimes of a trapezoidal cross section, but more usually all layers are of Z section wires which overlap and provide a relatively watertight envelope. Each successive layer is wound in alternate directions. [See Figure 1d).] a) Spiral-strand b) Wire ropes c) Cables d) Locked-coil Figure 1 Ð Typical cable construction 2 © BSI 03-2001
7.
BS 8100-3:1999 3.2 Symbols
4 Axes of members For the purposes of this part of BS 8100 the For the purposes of this part of BS 8100 the axes of following symbols apply. members are shown in Figure 2. NOTE They are based on those given in BS 8100-1 and -4 but it has not been possible to follow those conventions in all cases. 5 Structural configurations, system A cross-sectional area of the member length and effective slenderness As cross-sectional area of bolt in shear plane 5.1 General (shank or threaded section as relevant) There are a number of different configurations that (in mm2) are commonly used in lattice towers and masts. Each B leg length of angle, i.e. breadth requires separate consideration. Some popular arrangements are dealt with in 5.2 and 5.3. C length of individual angle between stitch In order to determine the buckling resistance of a bolts lattice member it is necessary first to derive the D bolt, solid round or tube diameter; depth of appropriate geometric length of the member between section intersection points providing restraint, defined as the E modulus of elasticity of steel ªsystemº length. The relevant slenderness ratio based F leg load on the system length and appropriate radius of gyration is calculated and the effective slenderness j reduction factor determined appropriate to the end conditions of the K effective slenderness factor member (see 5.5). NOTE KL is effective slenderness and Kl is effective 5.2 Leg members slenderness ratio. 5.2.1 Single members L length Single angles, tubular sections or solid rounds may Ld system length of diagonal member be used for leg sections. The capacity of the leg will Lh system length of horizontal member be dependent on the pattern and connections of N the design buckling resistance of a member bracings used to stabilize the leg. For legs or chords P1 compressive force in horizontal of K brace with axial compression load braced symmetrically in two normal planes or planes 608 apart, for example P2 tensile force in horizontal of K brace in the case of triangular structures, the slenderness Qu ultimate resistance of bolt should be determined from the system length rvv radius of gyration about axis vv between nodes, i.e. intersections of bracings. Effective slenderness factors are given in Table 2. rxx radius of gyration about axis xx When this bracing is staggered in two normal planes ryy radius of gyration about axis yy or planes 608 apart in the case of triangular t thickness of angle leg, thickness of tube wall structures, the system length should be taken as the x distance from centre line of bolt to end of length between nodes on one face. Modified effective member slenderness parameters are given for angle legs in y distance from centre line of bolt to edge of Table 2 to allow for their torsional instability in such member cases. NOTE A maximum effective slenderness ratio of 120 for leg z spacing between bolts members is good practice. a imperfection factor 5.2.2 Compound members b ratio of effective to gross area Compound members for legs may be built up with l slenderness ratio, i.e. system length divided two angles in cruciform section and then taken as by radius of gyration fully composite if welded continuously [see Figure 3a)]. When intermittently connected [see L relative slenderness (l/l1) Figure 3b)] the possible additional deformations due Leff effective slenderness (non- dimensional to shear should be taken into account by modifying parameter incorporating K) the slenderness ratio, l, in accordance with the sb specified minimum yield strength of bolt following: steel l2 = l02 + l12 sr reference stress of member where st specified minimum tensile strength of bolt l0 is the slenderness ratio of the full member; sy specified minimum yield strength of steel l1 is the slenderness ratio of one component member angle (C/rvv). su specified minimum tensile strength of steel NOTE It is good practice to have l0 $ l1 and l1 # 50 member A method for determining the size of battens is given x reduction factor for relevant buckling mode in annex A. © BSI 03-2001 3
8.
BS 8100-3:1999
t t y y y y u v v u v v u u B B B B x x x x x x x x u t t y u v v y v u u v B y y B Note: See 6.3(a) for value of B for angles connected through one leg only at both ends of the element under consideration y y y t B x x x x x x y y y Note: B is taken as the D D longest length of the individual angle, if unequal angles are used (see 6.3(a) ) Commonly used sections y y y tf tw tf y y t x x x x x x x x x x tw tw tw y y y y y tf tf Other sections Figure 2 Ð Dimensions and axes of sections 4 © BSI 03-2001
9.
BS 8100-3:1999
,, y ,,, y x ,, ,, x ,, ,,, ,,, x x ,, y y C a) b) Figure 3 Ð Cruciform angle sections 5.3 Primary bracing members When the load is not equally split into tension and compression and provided both members are 5.3.1 General continuous, the compression members should be Typical primary bracing patterns are shown in checked for the worst compressive load. In addition, Figure 4. it should be checked that the sum of the load Secondary bracings can be used to subdivide the carrying capacities of both members in compression primary bracing or main leg members as shown, for is at least equal to the algebraic sum of the loads in example, in Figures 4 and 5. the two members. For the calculations of these load NOTE A maximum effectiveness slenderness ratio of 180 for carrying capacities, the system length is the whole primary bracing members is good practice. length Ld and the radius of gyration is that about the rectangular axis parallel to the plane of the bracing. 5.3.2 Single lattice The value of the slenderness ratio, l, should be A single lattice is commonly used where the loads taken as one of the following: are light and the length relatively short, as for instance near the top of towers or in light guyed l = Ld/rxx or l = Ld/ryy for angles; masts [see Figure 4a) and g)]. The slenderness ratio, l, should be taken as: l = Ld/rxx for tubes or solid rounds. l = Ld/rvv for angles; 5.3.3.2 Cross bracing with secondary members l = Ld/rxx for tubes or solid rounds. Where secondary members are inserted [see Figure 4h) and Figure 5a) and b)], they reduce the 5.3.3 Cross bracing systems system length of the bracing member on the minimum axis to Ld1. The slenderness ratio, l, 5.3.3.1 Cross bracing without secondary members should be taken as: Provided that: a) the load is equally split into tension and l = Ld1/rvv for angles; compression; and l = Ld1/rxx for tubes or solid rounds b) both members are continuous [see Figure 4b)]; (normally not critical). and c) the members are adequately connected where Buckling should also be checked over the system they cross, then the centre of the connection may length Ld2 on the rectangular axis for buckling be considered as a point of restraint both transverse to the bracing and, when the load is not transverse to and in the plane of the bracing and equally split into tension and compression, over the the critical system length becomes length Ld2 on system length Ld for the algebraic sum of the loads the minimum axis. The slenderness ratio, l, should (see 5.3.3.1). be taken as: l = Ld2/rvv for angles; l = Ld2/rxx for tubes. NOTE Where either member is not continuous, the centre of the connection may only be considered as a restraint in the transverse direction if the detailing of the centre connection is such that the effective lateral stiffness of both members is maintained through the connection and the longitudinal axial stiffness is similar in both members. © BSI 03-2001 5
10.
BS 8100-3:1999
Figure 4 Ð Typical bracing patterns 6 © BSI 03-2001
11.
BS 8100-3:1999
Ld Ld2 Ld1 Ld2 Ld3 Ld Ld4 Ld1 Corner stay (of limited effect if both braces are in compression) a) b) Ld3 Ld3 Lh Ld2 Ld4 Ld1 Fully triangulated hip bracing c) Figure 5 Ð Use of secondary bracing systems [See also patterns g) to k) in Figure 4] © BSI 03-2001 7
12.
BS 8100-3:1999 5.3.3.3 Discontinuous
cross bracing with Buckling over system length Ld2 of the face bracing continuous horizontal at centre intersection on the rectangular axis should also be checked if The diagonal members should be designed in secondary bracing, but no hip bracing, has been accordance with 5.3.3.2. The horizontal member provided. Thus the slenderness ratio, l, should be should be sufficiently stiff in the transverse direction taken as: to provide restraints for the load cases where the compression in one member exceeds the tension in l = Ld2/rxx or Ld2/ryy as appropriate, for all the other or both members are in compression [see sections. Figure 4d) and k)]. This criterion will be satisfied by ensuring that the horizontal member without plan Where triangulated hip bracing has been provided, bracing withstands (as a strut over its full length Lh then the appropriate length between such hip on the rectangular axis) the algebraic sum of the members Ld4 should be used for checking buckling load in the two members of the cross brace resolved transverse to the face bracing on the appropriate in the horizontal direction. rectangular axis. Thus the slenderness ratio, l, NOTE A maximum effective slenderness ratio for the horizontal should be taken as: of 180 is good practice (as a strut over its full length on the rectangular axis). l = Ld4/rxx or Ld4/ryy for all sections. 5.3.3.4 Cross bracing with diagonal corner stays 5.3.4.2 Horizontal members with plan bracing In some patterns of cross bracing a corner stay is Where the length of the horizontal edge members inserted to reduce the system length transverse to becomes large, it is normal to subdivide them as part the plane of bracing [see Figure 5b)]. A similar of the plan bracing which provides a convenient procedure to that used for 5.3.3.1 may be used to basis to do this. (See 5.3.5.) determine whether the members are adequate with this restraint. The system length of the horizontal members is taken between intersection points in the plan bracing In this case five buckling checks should be carried for buckling transverse to the face of the structure, out, related to the appropriate system length: and between supports in plane for buckling in the a) buckling of member against the maximum load plane of the frame. over Ld1 on the minimum axis; Care is needed in the choice of the vv or rectangular b) buckling of member against the maximum load axes for single angle members. The vv axis should over Ld2 on the transverse rectangular axis; be used unless suitable restraint by bracing is c) buckling of two members in cross brace against provided in one plane at or about the mid-point of the algebraic sum of loads in cross brace over Ld3 the system length. In this case buckling should be on the transverse axis; checked about the vv axis over the intermediate d) buckling of two members (one in each of two length and about the appropriate rectangular axis adjacent faces) against the algebraic sum of the over the full length between restraints on that axis. loads in the two members connected by the 5.3.4.3 Horizontal members without plan bracing diagonal corner brace over Ld4 on the transverse For small widths of towers and for masts, plan axis; bracing may sometimes be omitted. [See also 5.5.1d) e) buckling of four members (each member of for reduction factor K1.] cross brace in two adjacent faces) against the The rectangular radius of gyration should be used algebraic sum of loads in all four members over Ld for buckling transverse to the frame over system on the transverse axis. length Lh (see Figure 7). In addition for single angle 5.3.4 K bracing systems [see Figure 4c), j) and 5c)] members, the radius of gyration about the vv axis should be used over Lh2 [see Figure 7a)] unless 5.3.4.1 Diagonal members restraint by secondary bracing at intervals along the The critical system length without secondary length is provided in which case the system length is members is Ld2 on the minimum axis and the Lh1 [see Figure 7b)]. However, buckling about the slenderness ratio, l, should be taken as: rectangular axis will be critical except in the case of an unequal angle. l = Ld2/rvv for angles; Additional allowance should be made for the l = Ld2/rxx for tubes and solid rounds. bending stresses induced in the edge members by loads transverse to the frame, e.g. wind which can If secondary members are used then the system produce significant point loads. length is Ld1 on the minimum axis, and the slenderness ratio, l, should be taken as: l = Ld1/rvv 8 © BSI 03-2001
13.
BS 8100-3:1999
If both ways, ties may be used Triangulated Not fully triangulated (not recommended for design unless careful attention is given to bending effects) Figure 6 Ð Typical plan bracing Lh Lh L h2 L h1 a) b) Figure 7 Ð K bracing horizontals without plan bracing © BSI 03-2001 9
14.
BS 8100-3:1999 5.3.4.4 Cranked
K bracing Where the plan is not fully triangulated, additional For large tower widths, a crank or bend may be allowance should be made for the bending stresses introduced into the main diagonals (see Figure 8). induced in the edge members by loads, e.g. wind, This has the effect of reducing the length and size of transverse to the frame whereby the main diagonal the redundant members but produces high stresses can impose a point load arising from the summation in the members meeting at the bend and necessitates of the distributed loading on the various face fully triangulated transverse support at the joint. members. Diagonals and horizontals should be designed as Attention should be given to vertical bending due to for K bracing, with the system lengths for diagonals the self weight of plan bracing. Support from hip based on their lengths to the knee joint. bracing can be used to reduce long spans. The design should be detailed to eliminate any face slope 5.3.4.5 Portal frame effect which promotes downward displacement of A horizontal member is sometimes introduced at the inner plan brace members. bend to turn the panel into a portal frame (see Figure 9). The main disadvantage of this is the lack 5.3.6 Multiple lattice bracing of articulation present in the K brace. This system is Multiple lattice bracing members should be designed sensitive to foundation settlement or movement and under the applied load on the minimum system Ld1 special consideration should be given to this for the slenderness ratio l = Ld1/rvv. The angle possibility. bracing members of a multiple lattice configuration This example also shows special secondary bracing should be checked on a system length from leg to which is less sensitive to loads resulting from such leg with the appropriate radius of gyration rxx or ryy movement. [see Figure 4e)] such that the overall effective slenderness ratio is limited to 350. For the stability of the panel rxx/rvv should be greater than 1.50, where rxx is the radius of gyration about the axis parallel to the plane of the lattice. 5.3.7 Tie systems Great care is needed with the use of tie systems particularly if used on large masts or towers, on masts or towers with sloping legs or in conjunction with secondary members. Each diagonal member of a pair of cross bracing members [see Figure 4f)] Figure 8 Ð Cranked K bracing should be capable of carrying the full bracing shear load in tension. Detailing to give an initial tension within the bracing and to provide mutual support at the central cross will be required to minimize deflection. It will also be necessary to pay special attention to possible fatigue problems. The horizontal members should be designed as horizontal strut members with or without plan bracing as appropriate for compression along their whole length. NOTE 1 Tension systems are very sensitive to methods of erection and to modification or relative movements. Special attention should be paid to possible excessive deflections and fatigue. To ensure their effectiveness measures should be taken to Figure 9 Ð Portal frame ensure that these matters are carefully considered. NOTE 2 A maximum effective slenderness ratio of 350 for tension members is good practice. 5.3.5 Plan bracing Plan bracings are required at bend lines of the leg, to provide lateral restraint to long horizontal members and to distribute local loads from ancillaries, etc. Plan bracing is also required to maintain the shape of square towers, particularly where K bracing is used, and to distribute eccentric loads. The non-triangulated systems shown in Figure 6 do not satisfy the first requirement. 10 © BSI 03-2001
15.
BS 8100-3:1999 5.3.8 Compound
members a) Values of this percentage of the leg load for 5.3.8.1 Double angles various values of the slenderness of the leg should Compound members consisting of a pair of identical be taken from Table 1. The slenderness ratio to be angles back to back (forming a T), separated by a used should be that of the restrained member, small distance and connected at intervals by spacers which will normally be L/rvv, where L is the length and stitch bolts, may be used for bracing. They between nodes and rvv is the minimum radius of should be checked for buckling about both gyration. rectangular axes as follows. (See also 5.5.1.) The effect of applying this force in the plane of the a) For buckling about the xx axis (see Figure 2) bracing at each node in turn should be calculated. the two angles should be assumed to act b) When there is more than one intermediate node compositely for the purpose of calculating stiffness in a panel then the secondary bracing systems and radius of gyration. should be checked separately for 2.5 % of the leg b) For buckling about the yy axis (see Figure 2) load shared equally between all the intermediate the additional deformation due to shear should be node points. These loads should be assumed to act taken into account by modifying the slenderness together and in the same direction, i.e. at right ratio, l, in accordance with the following: angles to the leg and in the plane of the bracing system. l2 = l02 +l12 taking a maximum value of In both cases a) and b) the distribution of forces l1 = 0.75l0 within the triangulated secondary bracing panel where should then be determined by stress diagrams or linear elastic analysis. l0 is the slenderness ratio of the full compound member; Table 1 Ð Applied force as percentage of leg l1 is the slenderness ratio of one component load, F angle (l1 = C/rvv). Slenderness ratio, l Applied force (percentage of leg load, F) In order to keep the effect of this interaction to a % minimum, the spacing between stitch bolts should be 0 to 40 1.02 limited to give a maximum value l1 of 90. 45 1.15 When only stitch bolts and packs are used, composite section properties should be based on 50 1.28 either: 55 1.42 1) the actual space between the individual angle 60 1.52 members, or 65 1.60 2) a space taken as 1.5 times the thickness of one 70 1.65 of the angle members, 75 1.70 whichever is the smaller. If batten plates are used, 80 1.75 composite section properties may always be used 85 1.80 based on the actual space between the individual 90 1.85 angle members. 95 1.92 5.3.8.2 Other compound members 100 2.00 For other compound member configurations and the 105 2.08 sizing of battens and stitch bolts or welds, refer 110 2.16 to 5.2.2. 115 2.23 5.4 Secondary members 120 2.30 Typical secondary bracing arrangements are shown 125 2.38 in Figures 4 to 9. 130 2.46 NOTE A maximum effective slenderness ratio of 240 for >132 2.50 secondary bracing members is good practice. The use of high slenderness can lead to the possibility of individual members NOTE 1 The tabulated values assume minimum axis restraint of vibrating, and can make them vulnerable to damage due to the leg by two such forces each in the plane of the bracing. bending from local loads. Where the critical direction is in the plane of the bracing In order to design secondary members it is necessary (e.g. round or cruciform sections) the values should be multiplied by a factor of √2. to apply a hypothetical force acting transverse to the leg member (or other chord if not a leg) being NOTE 2 These loads are not additive to the existing forces on the tower or mast. If the main member is eccentrically loaded or stabilized at the node point of the attachment of the the angle between the main diagonal of a K brace and the leg is secondary member. This force varies with the less than 258 then this figure may be unsafe and a more refined slenderness of the leg member being stabilized and is value should be obtained by taking into account the eccentricity expressed as a percentage of the leg load, F for moment and secondary stresses arising from leg deformation. which the following two checks should be carried NOTE 3 In general if the bracing strength requirements are met, out. the stiffness requirements should be sufficient. © BSI 03-2001 11
16.
BS 8100-3:1999
5.5 Calculation of effective slenderness Leff c) Compound bracing members buckling 5.5.1 General about the yy axis of the compound member In order to calculate the design buckling resistance of the member, the effective slenderness Leff should K is taken as 1.0. be determined. d) Horizontal bracing members in K The effective slenderness Leff should be derived bracing without plan bracing from: Horizontal members of K bracing without Leff = KL plan bracing (see 5.3.4.3) usually have compression in one half of their length where and tension in the other. In such cases the L is the relative slenderness of the member effective slenderness factor K of the about the appropriate axis for which the horizontal normal to the plane of the strength is required and is given by: frame, determined from Table 3 ignoring continuity, should be multiplied by the L = l/l1 factor K1 given in Table 4, depending on where the ratio of tension load P2 to the l is the slenderness ratio obtained compression load P1. from 5.3; E 0.5 | l1 = p sr 2750.5 | = 85.8 when E = 205 000 Mpa sr | sr is a reference stress given in 6.3; K is an effective slenderness factor depending on the structural configurations and is given as follows. a) Leg members K is given in Table 2. b) All bracing members except where c) and d) below are applicable K is dependent on both the bracing pattern (see Figures 4 and 5) and the connections of the bracing to the legs. K is dependent on the relative stiffness of the adjoining members, of the bolt or weld group and of the connecting gusset plate if relevant. Values of K for typical configurations are given in Table 3. For welded connections in particular, the factors depend on continuity of the weld all round the joined member(s). 12 © BSI 03-2001
17.
BS 8100-3:1999
Table 2 Ð Effective slenderness factor K for leg members © BSI 03-2001 13
18.
BS 8100-3:1999
Table 3 Ð Effective slenderness factor K for bracing members 14 © BSI 03-2001
19.
BS 8100-3:1999 Table
4 Ð Factor K1 for horizontal of K brace For hot rolled steel members with the types of (without plan bracing) cross-section commonly used for compression members, the relevant buckling mode is general Ratio P2/P1 Factor K1 ªflexuralº buckling. 0.00 0.73 In some cases the ªtorsionalº or ªflexural-torsionalº 0.20 0.67 modes may govern. For information on the design buckling resistance of compression members for 0.40 0.62 those sections not covered in this part of BS 8100, 0.60 0.57 reference may be made to BS 5950-5. 0.80 0.53 6.2 Reduction factor x 1.00 0.50 For constant axial compression in members of constant cross-section, the value of x for the appropriate effective slenderness Leff, should be 6 Calculation of design strength for determined from: members in compression 1 x= 2 2 L 2]0.5 6.1 General f + [f eff The design buckling resistance, N, of a compression where member should be taken as: N = jxAsr/gm f is 0.5 [1 + a (Leff 2 0.2) + Leff2]; where a is an imperfection factor; Leff is obtained from 5.5.1. j is 0.8 for single angle members connected by one bolt at each end, 0.9 for single angle and where members connected by one bolt at one end x#1 and continuous at the other end and 1.0 in all other cases; The imperfection factor a corresponding to the appropriate buckling curve should be obtained from A is the cross-sectional area of the member; Table 5. x is the reduction factor for the relevant buckling mode, given in 6.2; Table 5 Ð Imperfection factors sr is a reference stress given in 6.3; Buckling curve Imperfection factor a gm is the partial factor on strength, as given in a 0.21 BS 8100-1 and -4, appropriate to the quality b 0.34 class of the structure, subject to the following. c 0.49 a)For untested structures: d 0.76 gm is 1.1 for Class A structures; Values of the reduction factor x for the appropriate gm is 1.2 for Class B structures; effective slenderness Leff may be obtained from Table 6. gm varies from about 1.3 to 1.45 for Class C structures depending on the 6.3 Calculation of reference stress performance requirements. The reference stress sr required to derive the ultimate stress of a member depends on the b)For angle section towers which have slenderness of the section. Most hot rolled sections successfully been subjected to fullscale are at least semi-compact. Values of m and the tests under the equivalent factored loading limiting B/t and D/t ratios are given below, together or where similar configurations have been with formulae for the reference stress sr which is type tested: used in place of the yield stress sy for the design of slender sections. gm is 1.0 for Class A structures; a) Hot rolled angle sections gm is 1.1 for Class B structures; gm varies from about 1.2 to 1.35 for sr = sy if B/t # m Class C structures depending on the sr = sy(2 2 B/mt) if m < B/t < 1.33m performance requirements. sr = π2E/(5.1B/t)2 if B/t $ 1.33m © BSI 03-2001 15
20.
BS 8100-3:1999
Table 6 Ð Reduction factors x Leff Buckling curve a b c d 0.2 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.3 0.9775 0.9641 0.9491 0.9235 0.4 0.9528 0.9261 0.8973 0.8504 0.5 0.9243 0.8842 0.8430 0.7793 0.6 0.8900 0.8371 0.7854 0.7100 0.7 0.8477 0.7837 0.7247 0.6431 0.8 0.7957 0.7245 0.6622 0.5797 0.9 0.7339 0.6612 0.5998 0.5208 1.0 0.6656 0.5970 0.5399 0.4671 1.1 0.5960 0.5352 0.4842 0.4189 1.2 0.5300 0.4781 0.4338 0.3762 1.3 0.4703 0.4269 0.3888 0.3385 1.4 0.4179 0.3817 0.3492 0.3055 1.5 0.3724 0.3422 0.3145 0.2766 1.6 0.3332 0.3079 0.2842 0.2512 1.7 0.2994 0.2781 0.2577 0.2289 1.8 0.2702 0.2521 0.2345 0.2093 1.9 0.2449 0.2294 0,2141 0.1920 2.0 0.2229 0.2095 0,1962 0.1766 2.1 0.2036 0,1920 0,1803 0,1630 2.2 0.1867 0.1765 0.1662 0.1508 2.3 0.1717 0.1628 0.1537 0.1399 2.4 0.1585 0.1506 0.1425 0.1302 2.5 0.1467 0.1397 0.1325 0.1214 2.6 0.1362 0.1299 0.1234 0.1134 2.7 0.1267 0.1211 0.1153 0.1062 2.8 0.1182 0.1132 0.1079 0.0997 2.9 0.1105 0.1060 0.1012 0.0937 3.0 0.1036 0.0994 0.0951 0.0882 where b) Hot rolled tubular sections sy is the specified minimum yield stress of sr = sy if D/t # m material of member; E if D/t > m sr = 0.10 B is the leg length of the angle. For unequal D/t angles and compound angles, B is the longer length, except for single angles connected by where bolts or welding through one leg only at both ends of the element under consideration for sy is the specified minimum yield stress of which B should be taken as the length of the material of member; connected leg; D is the diameter of tubular section; t is the thickness of angle leg; t is the wall thickness of tubular section; E √ m is 0.10 ; E m is 0.567 ; sy sy E is the modulus of elasticity. E is the modulus of elasticity. 16 © BSI 03-2001
21.
BS 8100-3:1999
c) Cold formed angle sections 8 Bolted connections sr = sy if B/T # m 8.1 Angle bolted connections 5 2 2 B/mt if m < B/t < 1.5m Bolted connections should be designed in sr = sy accordance with BS 5950-1 but with the 3 3 modifications that the design resistance of a bolt Qu, sr = π2E/(5.1 B/t)2 if B/t $ 1.5m should be the least of the following (see Figure 10). In 8.1a) to 8.1f) the partial factor on strength gm for where both tested and untested structures should be taken as given in 6.1a) for untested structures (i.e. no sy is the specified minimum yield stress of advantage can be taken for structures which have material of member after forming; been tested). B is the leg length of the angle as defined a) Design shear resistance in 6.3a). For ultimate loads this is related to the minimum t is the thickness of angle leg; tensile strength st or the yield strength of the bolt √ E steel sb and the relevant cross-sectional area As: m is 0.503 ; sy Qu = 0.65stAs/gm or 0.95sbAs/gm whichever is E is the modulus of elasticity. the lesser. b) Design bearing resistance d) Cold formed tubular sections The design bearing resistance is normally related to the acceptable amount of deformation in the sr = sy if D/t # m hole and whilst values up to three times yield can E if D/t > m be used without failure, it is recommended that sr = 0.10 the stress is limited to twice the yield strength of D/t the member steel, sy, to reduce the deformation to where acceptable limits, i.e: Qu = 2.0Dtsy/gm sy is the specified minimum yield stress of c) Design tensile resistance material of member; When prying is ignored: D is the diameter of tubular section; Qu = 0.56stAs/gm but not greater than 0.8sbAs/gm t is the wall thickness of tubular section; When prying is taken into account in accordance m is 0.10 ; E with Table 8: sy Qu = 0.7stAs/gm but not greater than sbAs/gm E is the modulus of elasticity. d) End distance of bolt x 6.4 Selection of buckling curves Qu = 1.33 sy xt/gm for x > 1.5D For flexural buckling the appropriate buckling Qu = 2.0 sy (x 2 D/2) t/gm for x # 1.5D curves should be determined from Table 7. e) Centres of bolts for multiple bolt connections 7 Calculation of resistance of members Qu = sy (z 2 D/2) t/gm in tension f) Edge distance of bolt The resistance of a member in tension is the product Qu = 2.67 sy (y 2 D/2) t/gm of the yield strength and the net sectional area. NOTE 1 To utilize a design bearing resistance of 2.0 Dtsy requires x $ 1.5D and y $ 1.25D and z $ 2.5D. This is after allowance has The net sectional area of an angle connected through been made for fabrication tolerances in sizes. one leg should be taken as the net area of the NOTE 2 The design bearing resistance given in b) above may also connected leg, i.e. gross area minus holes, plus half be used when the thread is in bearing. the area of the unconnected leg. The net sectional area of an angle suitably connected through both legs should be taken as the sum of the net areas of both legs, i.e. gross area minus holes. © BSI 03-2001 17
22.
BS 8100-3:1999
Table 7 Ð Selection of buckling curve for a cross-section Buckling Buckling Cross section Limits about axis curve Angle sections hot rolled any b cold rolled any c - using fyb (See NOTE 1) cold formed any c - using fya (See NOTE 1) Commonly used sections ,, C, T, and solid sections any c Hollow sections hot rolled any a cold rolled any b - using fyb (See NOTE 1) cold formed any c - using fya (See NOTE 1) Rolled 'I' sections x-x a D/B ≤ 1.2: y-y b tf t f ≤ 40 mm y x-x b 40 mm < t f ≤ 100 mm y-y c x x Other sections D D/B ≤ 1.2: b y x-x B t f ≤ 100 mm y-y c t f > 100 mm x-x d y-y d NOTE 1 fyb is the basic yield of the material before cold forming ; fya is the average yield stress of the material after cold forming as calculated using BS 5950-5 18 © BSI 03-2001
23.
BS 8100-3:1999
D = bolt diameter x z t y Figure 10 Ð Location of bolts Table 8 Ð Relationships between flange, tube and bolts Ratio of flange to tube wall thickness b for Blank flanges 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 Ring flanges 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 Ratio of tensile design strength Increase in direct tension to allow for prying in the flange required to maximum tensile bolts (bolts prying factor) capacity of tubea 1.0 1.2 Do not use in 0.9 1.1 1.2 shaded zone 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 a The relationship between flange thickness ratio and bolt prying factor is a function of the extent to which the tube is loaded in tension. In permissible stress terms this is ft /pt or Fγ m /Aσy in accordance with this part of BS 8100. b Where different grades of steel are used in the tube and flange, the minimum ratio of flange to tube wall thickness should be varied in accordance with the ratio of the square root of their respective yields, within the range shown in the table. 8.2 Tubular and solid round bolted a) The relationships between flange thickness connections expressed as a ratio of tube wall thickness, bolt Where connections are formed with gusset plates prying factor, and extent to which the tube is and bolts in shear, the rules in 8.1 should be used. loaded in tension are shown in Table 8. Details which are not covered in 8.1 should be For the required tube design tensile strength designed in accordance with BS 5950-1. expressed as a proportion of its maximum tensile Where round flange joints are used on tubular capacity, the combination of bolt prying factor members, the following design recommendations along the line in the table, and flange thickness should be followed. ratio above this value should be provided as a minimum. © BSI 03-2001 19