SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 20
We will start in just a moment
Exercises Aimed to Help You Ace
the Viva
www.doctoralnet.com
How to Ace
Final Defense
or Viva Voce’
http://doctoralnet.com
Let’s figure out
whose in the room
Raise your hand if you go to
the following school….
• Business School
• Engineering & Computing
– School of Computing
– School of Electronic Engineering
– School of Mechanical &
Manufacturing Engineering
• Humanities & Social Sciences
– School of Applied Language &
Intercultural Studies
– School of Communications
– School of Education Studies
– School of Law & Government
– Fiontar
• Science & HealthSchool of
Biotechnology
• Chemical Sciences
• Health & Human Performance
• Mathematical Sciences
• Nursing & Human Sciences
• Physical Sciences
• Oscail - DCU Online Education
Let’s figure out
whose in the room
Raise your hand for all
the ones that are
true….
1. You have already submitted your
“final” full draft thesis to:
1. Your supervisor,
2. You examiners are approved
3. Your soft bound copy has been
accepted by registry (they send it to
examiners)
4. You’re in the stage of waiting 6 weeks
5. Perhaps the university has set up a
final defense or viva
6. if not then have you asked your
supervisor who will set up your date?
How long have you been on this journey?
1. You were successful in getting to this
point in: a) 2 years? b) 3 years? c) 4
years? d) More?
How prepared do you feel?
1. You: a) feel you have a good
understanding of the “endgame”? b) are
confused a bit about the “endgame”? c)
Have heard all sorts of stories and are
concerned about “endgame.”
Remember your examination is the
schools responsibility! This is a
process you go through but you don’t
need to manage it.
Steps/Agenda
1. The range of
questions you might
expect to hear when
defending”
2. Questions you may
want to ask before the
day
3. How are theses/
dissertations
evaluated?
4. What can you do to
make sure yours
meets these criteria?
INTERVAL
The range you
might expect
when defending”
Range of Experiences
Manage the expectations of your family & friends – the question
most likely is how much work will still be required?
1. DCU has 6 possible outcomes:
1. Award recommended no corrections needed
2. Award recommended: corrections revisions required
1. Some will require another layer of validation
3. No award now pending another viva after revisions
4. Recommended to withdraw for another masters OR major
revisions for another viva
5. Strong recommendation for Masters
6. No degree should be awarded (very rare).
2. It is YOUR responsibility not to leave confused about what is
next to be expected of you.
3. Questions can be mild to in depth, from knowledgeable to
“where did that come from?”
4. Examiners can be polite, encouraging to strict or hostile feeling.
Range of Questions
Value-added and originality
1. What are the most original (or value-added) parts of your thesis?
2. Which propositions or findings would you say are distinctively your own?
3. How do you think your work takes forward or develops the literature in this field?
4. What are the ‘bottom line’ conclusions of your research? How innovative or valuable are they? What
does your work tell us that we did not know before?
5. Origins and the scope of the research
6. Can you explain how you came to choose this topic for your doctorate What was it that first interested
you about it? How did the research focus change over time?
7. Why have you defined the final topic in the way you did? What were some of the difficulties you
encountered and how did they influence how the topic was framed? What main problems or issues did
you have in deciding what was in-scope and out-of-scope?
Methods
1. What are the core methods used in this thesis? Why did you choose this approach? In an ideal world,
are there different techniques or other forms of data and evidence that you’d have liked to use?
2. Data or information
3. What are the main sources or kinds of evidence? Are they strong enough in terms of their quantity and
quality to sustain the conclusions that you draw? Do the data or information you consider appropriately
measure or relate to the theoretical concepts, or underlying social or physical phenomena, that you are
interested in?
Dunleavey, P. (2013). Top ten questions for the PhD oral exam. Retrieved from https://medium.com/advice-
and-help-in-authoring-a-phd-or-non-fiction/c3687cc75962
Range of Questions.2
Findings
How do your findings fit with or contradict the rest of the literature in this field? How do you explain the
differences of findings, or estimation, or interpretation between your work and that of other authors?
What next?
What are the main implications or lessons of your research for the future development of work in this specific
sub-field? Are there any wider implications for other parts of the discipline? Do you have ‘next step’ or follow-
on research projects in mind?
James, E. A. (2014). Writing your doctoral dissertation or thesis faster : A proven map to success (H.
Salmon Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publishing.
Be prepared to discuss your empirical work – is it verifiable?
Have you delimited your scope?
What are the assumptions you made before you started and how did they influence your outcomes?
Are these assumptions acceptable within your field? Can you give an example of who else has worked with
or mentioned them?
What scales operationalize your variables? How do you know they are valid?
What are your findings in terms of effect size?
For quantitative evidence – take us through your test(s) of power.
For qualitative evidence – take us through the process through which you developed/triangulated your
themes.
Questions you
may want to ask
before the day
Answers You’ll Need
1. What guidelines are you writing to and how strict will the examiners be?
2. Who/ How Many Examiners Will There Be? 2+ Chair + supervisor with
their permission – useful to take notes
3. Will they expect a presentation or overview or will they just jump in?
4. Can you make changes or work at improving your document after you
turn it in?
5. Will you hear the results at the end? Will known recommendation –
required changes will follow in 7 day
6. If you have required revisions – how long do you have to complete
them? 6 week, 6 months or 1 year Prioritize these
7. What is the endgame if you have to turn in revisions? Who judges
them? How long before you hear results.2?
8. What are the steps for publication afterwards?
9. No copyediting – corrections back to examiner for sign off
10. Hardcopy to registry – Softcopy/digital to supervisor and
for Doras- open repository
Lovitts, B. E. (2005). How to grade a dissertation. Academe, 91(6), 18-23.
How are theses/
dissertations
evaluated?
http://doctoralnet.com
Evaluation
What Makes for Outstanding?
• Original and significant, ambitious, brilliant, clear, clever, coherent,
compelling, concise, creative, elegant, engaging, exciting, interesting,
insightful, persuasive, sophisticated, surprising, and thoughtful
• Very well written and organized
• Synthetic and interdisciplinary
• Connects components in a seamless way
• Exhibits mature, independent thinking
• Has a point of view and a strong, confident, independent, and
authoritative voice
• Asks new questions or addresses an important question or problem
• Clearly states the problem and why it is important
• Displays a deep understanding of a massive amount of complicated
literature
• Exhibits command and authority over the material
• Argument is focused, logical, rigorous, and sustained
• Is theoretically sophisticated and shows a deep understanding of
theory
• Has a brilliant research design
• Uses or develops new tools, methods, approaches, or types of
analyses
• Is thoroughly researched
• Has rich data from multiple sources
• Analysis is comprehensive, complete, sophisticated, and convincing
• Results are significant
• Conclusion ties the whole thing together
• Is publishable in top-tier journals
• Is of interest to a larger community and changes the way people think
• Pushes the discipline's boundaries and opens new areas for research
•General quality – pass
at the outstanding, very
good or acceptable
level.
•Has internal
consistency
•Meet the benchmarks
What is Acceptable?
• Is workmanlike
• Demonstrates technical competence
• Shows the ability to do research
• Is not very original or significant
• Is not interesting, exciting, or surprising
• Displays little creativity, imagination, or insight
• Writing is pedestrian and plodding
• Has a weak structure and organization
• Is narrow in scope
• Has a question or problem that is not exciting--is often
highly derivative or an extension of the adviser's work
• Displays a narrow understanding of the field
• Reviews the literature adequately--knows the literature but
is not critical of it or does not discuss what is important
• Can sustain an argument, but the argument is not
imaginative complex, or convincing
• Demonstrates understanding of theory at a simple level,
and theory is minimally to competently applied to the
problem
• Uses standard methods
• Has an unsophisticated analysis--does not explore all
possibilities and misses connections
• Has predictable results that are not exciting
• Makes a small contribution
What is Unacceptable?
• Is poorly written
• Has spelling and grammatical errors
• Has a sloppy presentation
• Contains errors or mistakes
• Plagiarizes or deliberately misreads or misuses sources
• Does not understand basic concepts, processes, or
conventions of the discipline
• Lacks careful thought
• Looks at a question or problem that is trivial weak,
unoriginal, or already solved
• Does not understand or misses relevant literature
• Has a weak, inconsistent, self-contradictory, unconvincing,
or invalid argument
• Does not handle theory well, or theory is missing or
wrong
• Relies on inappropriate or incorrect methods
• Has data that are flawed, wrong, false, fudged, or
misinterpreted
• Has wrong, inappropriate, incoherent, or confused
analysis
• Includes results that are obvious already known,
unexplained, or misinterpreted
• Has unsupported or exaggerated interpretation
• Does not make a contribution
•
Methods (con’t)
• In alignment with the question addressed and the
theory used In addition, the author demonstrates
• An understanding of the methods' advantages
and disadvantages
• How to use the methods
Component 5: Results or Analysis
The analysis
• Is appropriate
• Aligns with the question and hypotheses raised
• Shows sophistication
• Is iterative
Amount and quality of data or information is
• Sufficient
• Well presented
• Intelligently interpreted
The author also cogently expresses
• The insights gained from the study
• The study's limitations
Component 6: Discussion or Conclusion
The conclusion
• Summarizes the findings
• Provides perspective on them
• Refers back to the introduction
• Ties everything together
• Discusses the study's strengths and weaknesses
• Discusses implications and applications for the
discipline
• Discusses future directions for research
Component 1: Introduction
•The introduction
•Includes a problem statement
•Makes clear the research question to be addressed
•Describes the motivation for the study
•Describes the context in which the question arises
•Summarizes the dissertation's findings
•Discusses the importance of the findings
•Provides a roadmap for readers
Component 2: Literature Review
•The review
•Is comprehensive and up to date
•Shows a command of the literature
•Contextualizes the problem
•Includes a discussion of the literature that is selective,
synthetic, analytical, and thematic
Component 3: Theory
The theory that is applied or developed
Is appropriate
• Is logically interpreted
• Is well understood
• Aligns with the question at hand
In addition, the author shows comprehension of the
theory's
• Strengths
• Limitations
Component 4: Methods
The methods applied or developed are
• Appropriate
• Described in detail
Where to go for help
Lovitts, B. E. (2005).
How to grade a
dissertation. Academe,
91(6), 18-23.
http://doctoralnet.com
Exercise:
Turn to your neighbour and
give them three ways
according to this list that you
feel your thesis will make
the outstanding mark.
What can you do to
make sure yours
meets these criteria?
Thomson, P. (2014). Preparing for the PhD oral exam. Retrieved from
http://patthomson.wordpress.com/2014/04/17/preparing-for-the-phd-oral-exam/
Tests and Trials
•Read it all out loud!
Listen for your voice.
•Analyse for areas of
strength and
weakness
•Read up on the
questions most
frequently asked
•Practice so you are
assured you will be:
•Confident
•Non defensive
•Have skills
breathing when
stressed
Now its your turn to share…
What questions still lurk in your brain?
What are your “take aways” from today’s session?
Links of interest:
Examiner report form is available
at: http://www.dcu.ie/sites/default/files/registry/word/PGR6
.pdf
institutional repository is at : http://doras.dcu.ie/
alana@doctoralnet.com

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Remedial model
Remedial modelRemedial model
Remedial model
Poon Kwan
 
Training Manual on Human Rights and Local Governance
Training Manual on Human Rights and Local GovernanceTraining Manual on Human Rights and Local Governance
Training Manual on Human Rights and Local Governance
Shankor Paul
 
Appreciative inquiry
Appreciative inquiryAppreciative inquiry
Appreciative inquiry
Mercedes Viola
 
Class session 4 program ideas and needs assessment
Class session 4   program ideas and needs assessmentClass session 4   program ideas and needs assessment
Class session 4 program ideas and needs assessment
tjcarter
 

Mais procurados (20)

Community Learning Programme (CLP): Innovative content development and dissem...
Community Learning Programme (CLP): Innovative content development and dissem...Community Learning Programme (CLP): Innovative content development and dissem...
Community Learning Programme (CLP): Innovative content development and dissem...
 
Strengths Based Approaches
Strengths Based ApproachesStrengths Based Approaches
Strengths Based Approaches
 
The Agile Approach to Patient Journey Marketing
The Agile Approach to Patient Journey Marketing The Agile Approach to Patient Journey Marketing
The Agile Approach to Patient Journey Marketing
 
Collaboration
CollaborationCollaboration
Collaboration
 
We live in a VUCA world
We live in a VUCA worldWe live in a VUCA world
We live in a VUCA world
 
Perezramirez almabelen m23_s2_fase3
Perezramirez almabelen m23_s2_fase3Perezramirez almabelen m23_s2_fase3
Perezramirez almabelen m23_s2_fase3
 
The Four Horseman of Toxic Behaviour
The Four Horseman of Toxic BehaviourThe Four Horseman of Toxic Behaviour
The Four Horseman of Toxic Behaviour
 
Collaborative leadership
Collaborative leadershipCollaborative leadership
Collaborative leadership
 
Remedial model
Remedial modelRemedial model
Remedial model
 
Appreciative inquiry
Appreciative inquiryAppreciative inquiry
Appreciative inquiry
 
Personalysis summary report
Personalysis summary reportPersonalysis summary report
Personalysis summary report
 
Training Manual on Human Rights and Local Governance
Training Manual on Human Rights and Local GovernanceTraining Manual on Human Rights and Local Governance
Training Manual on Human Rights and Local Governance
 
Appreciative inquiry
Appreciative inquiryAppreciative inquiry
Appreciative inquiry
 
Digital Leadership
Digital LeadershipDigital Leadership
Digital Leadership
 
Gender mainstreaming ppt
Gender mainstreaming pptGender mainstreaming ppt
Gender mainstreaming ppt
 
Community Engagement: principles and best practices
Community Engagement: principles and best practicesCommunity Engagement: principles and best practices
Community Engagement: principles and best practices
 
GENDER BIAS AT WORKPLACE
GENDER BIAS AT WORKPLACEGENDER BIAS AT WORKPLACE
GENDER BIAS AT WORKPLACE
 
Class session 4 program ideas and needs assessment
Class session 4   program ideas and needs assessmentClass session 4   program ideas and needs assessment
Class session 4 program ideas and needs assessment
 
Function of social welfare administration
Function of social welfare administrationFunction of social welfare administration
Function of social welfare administration
 
Good Boards Presentation Basics
Good Boards Presentation  BasicsGood Boards Presentation  Basics
Good Boards Presentation Basics
 

Destaque

Data Analysis, Presentation and Interpretation of Data
Data Analysis, Presentation and Interpretation of DataData Analysis, Presentation and Interpretation of Data
Data Analysis, Presentation and Interpretation of Data
Roqui Malijan
 
Quantitative And Qualitative Research
Quantitative And Qualitative ResearchQuantitative And Qualitative Research
Quantitative And Qualitative Research
doha07
 
Qualitative and quantitative methods of research
Qualitative and quantitative methods of researchQualitative and quantitative methods of research
Qualitative and quantitative methods of research
Jordan Cruz
 

Destaque (7)

What You Can Do to Write Your Thesis/Dissertation Consistently
What You Can Do to Write Your Thesis/Dissertation ConsistentlyWhat You Can Do to Write Your Thesis/Dissertation Consistently
What You Can Do to Write Your Thesis/Dissertation Consistently
 
Are You Ready to Write Up Your Quantitative Data?
 Are You Ready to Write Up Your Quantitative Data? Are You Ready to Write Up Your Quantitative Data?
Are You Ready to Write Up Your Quantitative Data?
 
Results chapter conducting, interpreting, and writing
Results chapter conducting, interpreting, and writingResults chapter conducting, interpreting, and writing
Results chapter conducting, interpreting, and writing
 
Quantitative Analysis: Conducting, Interpreting, & Writing
Quantitative Analysis: Conducting, Interpreting, & WritingQuantitative Analysis: Conducting, Interpreting, & Writing
Quantitative Analysis: Conducting, Interpreting, & Writing
 
Data Analysis, Presentation and Interpretation of Data
Data Analysis, Presentation and Interpretation of DataData Analysis, Presentation and Interpretation of Data
Data Analysis, Presentation and Interpretation of Data
 
Quantitative And Qualitative Research
Quantitative And Qualitative ResearchQuantitative And Qualitative Research
Quantitative And Qualitative Research
 
Qualitative and quantitative methods of research
Qualitative and quantitative methods of researchQualitative and quantitative methods of research
Qualitative and quantitative methods of research
 

Semelhante a How to ace the viva dcu

How to be a successful research assistant
How to be a successful research assistantHow to be a successful research assistant
How to be a successful research assistant
Xiao Qin
 

Semelhante a How to ace the viva dcu (20)

How to ace Phd/Doctoral final oral defense or viva voce'
How to ace Phd/Doctoral final oral defense or viva voce'How to ace Phd/Doctoral final oral defense or viva voce'
How to ace Phd/Doctoral final oral defense or viva voce'
 
Part 2 surviving viva 2017
Part 2 surviving viva 2017Part 2 surviving viva 2017
Part 2 surviving viva 2017
 
Surviving Your Viva or Dissertation Defense
Surviving Your Viva or Dissertation DefenseSurviving Your Viva or Dissertation Defense
Surviving Your Viva or Dissertation Defense
 
Survive your PhD Final Defense or Viva - 2017
Survive your PhD Final Defense or Viva - 2017Survive your PhD Final Defense or Viva - 2017
Survive your PhD Final Defense or Viva - 2017
 
Top questions asked during ph
Top questions asked during phTop questions asked during ph
Top questions asked during ph
 
Thesis & viva student version 2013 [compatibility mode]
Thesis & viva student version 2013 [compatibility mode]Thesis & viva student version 2013 [compatibility mode]
Thesis & viva student version 2013 [compatibility mode]
 
What is Critical Thinking, and How to Teach It?
What is Critical Thinking, and How to Teach It?What is Critical Thinking, and How to Teach It?
What is Critical Thinking, and How to Teach It?
 
PhD Support: Handling Criticism and Peer Review
PhD Support: Handling Criticism and Peer ReviewPhD Support: Handling Criticism and Peer Review
PhD Support: Handling Criticism and Peer Review
 
Research in healthcare
Research in healthcareResearch in healthcare
Research in healthcare
 
Research process by Dr.T.V.Rao MD
Research process by Dr.T.V.Rao MDResearch process by Dr.T.V.Rao MD
Research process by Dr.T.V.Rao MD
 
6_2019_10_31!10_52_47_PM.PPT
6_2019_10_31!10_52_47_PM.PPT6_2019_10_31!10_52_47_PM.PPT
6_2019_10_31!10_52_47_PM.PPT
 
Questionnaire design for beginners (Bart Rienties)
Questionnaire design for beginners (Bart Rienties)Questionnaire design for beginners (Bart Rienties)
Questionnaire design for beginners (Bart Rienties)
 
Tips and tricks in hand surgery research
Tips and tricks in hand surgery researchTips and tricks in hand surgery research
Tips and tricks in hand surgery research
 
2012 Ethics Workshop Presentation
2012 Ethics Workshop Presentation2012 Ethics Workshop Presentation
2012 Ethics Workshop Presentation
 
06 Research Proposal
06 Research Proposal06 Research Proposal
06 Research Proposal
 
How to be a successful research assistant
How to be a successful research assistantHow to be a successful research assistant
How to be a successful research assistant
 
Preparing for your viva
Preparing for your vivaPreparing for your viva
Preparing for your viva
 
Writing a Successful Paper (Academic Writing Engineering)
Writing a Successful Paper (Academic Writing Engineering)Writing a Successful Paper (Academic Writing Engineering)
Writing a Successful Paper (Academic Writing Engineering)
 
Finding a research topic
Finding a research topicFinding a research topic
Finding a research topic
 
Presentation Teaching Evidence-Based Management NYU Wagner 2014
Presentation Teaching Evidence-Based Management NYU Wagner 2014Presentation Teaching Evidence-Based Management NYU Wagner 2014
Presentation Teaching Evidence-Based Management NYU Wagner 2014
 

Mais de DoctoralNet Limited

Mais de DoctoralNet Limited (20)

DoctoralNet case studies tools for phds through the whole journey-output-co...
DoctoralNet case studies   tools for phds through the whole journey-output-co...DoctoralNet case studies   tools for phds through the whole journey-output-co...
DoctoralNet case studies tools for phds through the whole journey-output-co...
 
MastersNet tools for getting the most out of your masters
MastersNet tools for getting the most out of your masters MastersNet tools for getting the most out of your masters
MastersNet tools for getting the most out of your masters
 
Grit and the 7 habits of those who are highly successful
Grit and the 7 habits of those who are highly successfulGrit and the 7 habits of those who are highly successful
Grit and the 7 habits of those who are highly successful
 
How to plan so that your graduate work blends easily with your life.compressed
How to plan so that your graduate work blends easily with your life.compressedHow to plan so that your graduate work blends easily with your life.compressed
How to plan so that your graduate work blends easily with your life.compressed
 
How to find your Topic, with resources & processes
How to find your Topic, with resources & processesHow to find your Topic, with resources & processes
How to find your Topic, with resources & processes
 
Literature + Results = Findings/Argument for ABDs
Literature + Results = Findings/Argument for ABDsLiterature + Results = Findings/Argument for ABDs
Literature + Results = Findings/Argument for ABDs
 
Kick Start for ABDs
Kick Start for ABDsKick Start for ABDs
Kick Start for ABDs
 
Model dissertations What makes these good? part 1
Model dissertations   What makes these good? part 1Model dissertations   What makes these good? part 1
Model dissertations What makes these good? part 1
 
Model dissertations What makes these good part 2
Model dissertations   What makes these good part 2Model dissertations   What makes these good part 2
Model dissertations What makes these good part 2
 
Critical Thinking for PhD Lingerers
Critical Thinking for PhD LingerersCritical Thinking for PhD Lingerers
Critical Thinking for PhD Lingerers
 
Ethical review 2017
Ethical review 2017Ethical review 2017
Ethical review 2017
 
From data to endgame for dissertation and theses: what does it take
From data to endgame for dissertation and theses: what does it takeFrom data to endgame for dissertation and theses: what does it take
From data to endgame for dissertation and theses: what does it take
 
Designing research part 1 with exercise
Designing research part 1 with exerciseDesigning research part 1 with exercise
Designing research part 1 with exercise
 
Independence in Graduate School: How to develop and enhance yours
Independence in Graduate School: How to develop and enhance yoursIndependence in Graduate School: How to develop and enhance yours
Independence in Graduate School: How to develop and enhance yours
 
The Process to Write a Doctoral Lit Review 2017 part two
The Process to Write a Doctoral Lit Review 2017 part twoThe Process to Write a Doctoral Lit Review 2017 part two
The Process to Write a Doctoral Lit Review 2017 part two
 
Endgame2 backwards mapping
Endgame2 backwards mappingEndgame2 backwards mapping
Endgame2 backwards mapping
 
Work life balance for Graduate Students
Work life balance for Graduate StudentsWork life balance for Graduate Students
Work life balance for Graduate Students
 
Weaving together the end game
Weaving together the end gameWeaving together the end game
Weaving together the end game
 
Organization for 2017 for Doctoral Students: part one considering all the li...
Organization for 2017 for Doctoral Students: part one  considering all the li...Organization for 2017 for Doctoral Students: part one  considering all the li...
Organization for 2017 for Doctoral Students: part one considering all the li...
 
Theoretical or conceptual frameworks for dissertations or theses 2016
Theoretical or conceptual frameworks for dissertations or theses 2016Theoretical or conceptual frameworks for dissertations or theses 2016
Theoretical or conceptual frameworks for dissertations or theses 2016
 

Último

The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functionsSalient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
KarakKing
 

Último (20)

TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
 
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptxTowards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
 
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POSHow to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptxExploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
 
Interdisciplinary_Insights_Data_Collection_Methods.pptx
Interdisciplinary_Insights_Data_Collection_Methods.pptxInterdisciplinary_Insights_Data_Collection_Methods.pptx
Interdisciplinary_Insights_Data_Collection_Methods.pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functionsSalient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
 
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdfFood safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
 
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptxWellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptxREMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
 
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
 
Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)
Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)
Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)
 
NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...
NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...
NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...
 
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
 
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - EnglishGraduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
 

How to ace the viva dcu

  • 1. We will start in just a moment Exercises Aimed to Help You Ace the Viva www.doctoralnet.com
  • 2. How to Ace Final Defense or Viva Voce’ http://doctoralnet.com
  • 3. Let’s figure out whose in the room Raise your hand if you go to the following school…. • Business School • Engineering & Computing – School of Computing – School of Electronic Engineering – School of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering • Humanities & Social Sciences – School of Applied Language & Intercultural Studies – School of Communications – School of Education Studies – School of Law & Government – Fiontar • Science & HealthSchool of Biotechnology • Chemical Sciences • Health & Human Performance • Mathematical Sciences • Nursing & Human Sciences • Physical Sciences • Oscail - DCU Online Education
  • 4. Let’s figure out whose in the room Raise your hand for all the ones that are true…. 1. You have already submitted your “final” full draft thesis to: 1. Your supervisor, 2. You examiners are approved 3. Your soft bound copy has been accepted by registry (they send it to examiners) 4. You’re in the stage of waiting 6 weeks 5. Perhaps the university has set up a final defense or viva 6. if not then have you asked your supervisor who will set up your date? How long have you been on this journey? 1. You were successful in getting to this point in: a) 2 years? b) 3 years? c) 4 years? d) More? How prepared do you feel? 1. You: a) feel you have a good understanding of the “endgame”? b) are confused a bit about the “endgame”? c) Have heard all sorts of stories and are concerned about “endgame.” Remember your examination is the schools responsibility! This is a process you go through but you don’t need to manage it.
  • 5. Steps/Agenda 1. The range of questions you might expect to hear when defending” 2. Questions you may want to ask before the day 3. How are theses/ dissertations evaluated? 4. What can you do to make sure yours meets these criteria? INTERVAL
  • 6. The range you might expect when defending”
  • 7. Range of Experiences Manage the expectations of your family & friends – the question most likely is how much work will still be required? 1. DCU has 6 possible outcomes: 1. Award recommended no corrections needed 2. Award recommended: corrections revisions required 1. Some will require another layer of validation 3. No award now pending another viva after revisions 4. Recommended to withdraw for another masters OR major revisions for another viva 5. Strong recommendation for Masters 6. No degree should be awarded (very rare). 2. It is YOUR responsibility not to leave confused about what is next to be expected of you. 3. Questions can be mild to in depth, from knowledgeable to “where did that come from?” 4. Examiners can be polite, encouraging to strict or hostile feeling.
  • 8. Range of Questions Value-added and originality 1. What are the most original (or value-added) parts of your thesis? 2. Which propositions or findings would you say are distinctively your own? 3. How do you think your work takes forward or develops the literature in this field? 4. What are the ‘bottom line’ conclusions of your research? How innovative or valuable are they? What does your work tell us that we did not know before? 5. Origins and the scope of the research 6. Can you explain how you came to choose this topic for your doctorate What was it that first interested you about it? How did the research focus change over time? 7. Why have you defined the final topic in the way you did? What were some of the difficulties you encountered and how did they influence how the topic was framed? What main problems or issues did you have in deciding what was in-scope and out-of-scope? Methods 1. What are the core methods used in this thesis? Why did you choose this approach? In an ideal world, are there different techniques or other forms of data and evidence that you’d have liked to use? 2. Data or information 3. What are the main sources or kinds of evidence? Are they strong enough in terms of their quantity and quality to sustain the conclusions that you draw? Do the data or information you consider appropriately measure or relate to the theoretical concepts, or underlying social or physical phenomena, that you are interested in? Dunleavey, P. (2013). Top ten questions for the PhD oral exam. Retrieved from https://medium.com/advice- and-help-in-authoring-a-phd-or-non-fiction/c3687cc75962
  • 9. Range of Questions.2 Findings How do your findings fit with or contradict the rest of the literature in this field? How do you explain the differences of findings, or estimation, or interpretation between your work and that of other authors? What next? What are the main implications or lessons of your research for the future development of work in this specific sub-field? Are there any wider implications for other parts of the discipline? Do you have ‘next step’ or follow- on research projects in mind? James, E. A. (2014). Writing your doctoral dissertation or thesis faster : A proven map to success (H. Salmon Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publishing. Be prepared to discuss your empirical work – is it verifiable? Have you delimited your scope? What are the assumptions you made before you started and how did they influence your outcomes? Are these assumptions acceptable within your field? Can you give an example of who else has worked with or mentioned them? What scales operationalize your variables? How do you know they are valid? What are your findings in terms of effect size? For quantitative evidence – take us through your test(s) of power. For qualitative evidence – take us through the process through which you developed/triangulated your themes.
  • 10. Questions you may want to ask before the day
  • 11. Answers You’ll Need 1. What guidelines are you writing to and how strict will the examiners be? 2. Who/ How Many Examiners Will There Be? 2+ Chair + supervisor with their permission – useful to take notes 3. Will they expect a presentation or overview or will they just jump in? 4. Can you make changes or work at improving your document after you turn it in? 5. Will you hear the results at the end? Will known recommendation – required changes will follow in 7 day 6. If you have required revisions – how long do you have to complete them? 6 week, 6 months or 1 year Prioritize these 7. What is the endgame if you have to turn in revisions? Who judges them? How long before you hear results.2? 8. What are the steps for publication afterwards? 9. No copyediting – corrections back to examiner for sign off 10. Hardcopy to registry – Softcopy/digital to supervisor and for Doras- open repository
  • 12. Lovitts, B. E. (2005). How to grade a dissertation. Academe, 91(6), 18-23. How are theses/ dissertations evaluated? http://doctoralnet.com
  • 13. Evaluation What Makes for Outstanding? • Original and significant, ambitious, brilliant, clear, clever, coherent, compelling, concise, creative, elegant, engaging, exciting, interesting, insightful, persuasive, sophisticated, surprising, and thoughtful • Very well written and organized • Synthetic and interdisciplinary • Connects components in a seamless way • Exhibits mature, independent thinking • Has a point of view and a strong, confident, independent, and authoritative voice • Asks new questions or addresses an important question or problem • Clearly states the problem and why it is important • Displays a deep understanding of a massive amount of complicated literature • Exhibits command and authority over the material • Argument is focused, logical, rigorous, and sustained • Is theoretically sophisticated and shows a deep understanding of theory • Has a brilliant research design • Uses or develops new tools, methods, approaches, or types of analyses • Is thoroughly researched • Has rich data from multiple sources • Analysis is comprehensive, complete, sophisticated, and convincing • Results are significant • Conclusion ties the whole thing together • Is publishable in top-tier journals • Is of interest to a larger community and changes the way people think • Pushes the discipline's boundaries and opens new areas for research •General quality – pass at the outstanding, very good or acceptable level. •Has internal consistency •Meet the benchmarks
  • 14. What is Acceptable? • Is workmanlike • Demonstrates technical competence • Shows the ability to do research • Is not very original or significant • Is not interesting, exciting, or surprising • Displays little creativity, imagination, or insight • Writing is pedestrian and plodding • Has a weak structure and organization • Is narrow in scope • Has a question or problem that is not exciting--is often highly derivative or an extension of the adviser's work • Displays a narrow understanding of the field • Reviews the literature adequately--knows the literature but is not critical of it or does not discuss what is important • Can sustain an argument, but the argument is not imaginative complex, or convincing • Demonstrates understanding of theory at a simple level, and theory is minimally to competently applied to the problem • Uses standard methods • Has an unsophisticated analysis--does not explore all possibilities and misses connections • Has predictable results that are not exciting • Makes a small contribution
  • 15. What is Unacceptable? • Is poorly written • Has spelling and grammatical errors • Has a sloppy presentation • Contains errors or mistakes • Plagiarizes or deliberately misreads or misuses sources • Does not understand basic concepts, processes, or conventions of the discipline • Lacks careful thought • Looks at a question or problem that is trivial weak, unoriginal, or already solved • Does not understand or misses relevant literature • Has a weak, inconsistent, self-contradictory, unconvincing, or invalid argument • Does not handle theory well, or theory is missing or wrong • Relies on inappropriate or incorrect methods • Has data that are flawed, wrong, false, fudged, or misinterpreted • Has wrong, inappropriate, incoherent, or confused analysis • Includes results that are obvious already known, unexplained, or misinterpreted • Has unsupported or exaggerated interpretation • Does not make a contribution •
  • 16. Methods (con’t) • In alignment with the question addressed and the theory used In addition, the author demonstrates • An understanding of the methods' advantages and disadvantages • How to use the methods Component 5: Results or Analysis The analysis • Is appropriate • Aligns with the question and hypotheses raised • Shows sophistication • Is iterative Amount and quality of data or information is • Sufficient • Well presented • Intelligently interpreted The author also cogently expresses • The insights gained from the study • The study's limitations Component 6: Discussion or Conclusion The conclusion • Summarizes the findings • Provides perspective on them • Refers back to the introduction • Ties everything together • Discusses the study's strengths and weaknesses • Discusses implications and applications for the discipline • Discusses future directions for research Component 1: Introduction •The introduction •Includes a problem statement •Makes clear the research question to be addressed •Describes the motivation for the study •Describes the context in which the question arises •Summarizes the dissertation's findings •Discusses the importance of the findings •Provides a roadmap for readers Component 2: Literature Review •The review •Is comprehensive and up to date •Shows a command of the literature •Contextualizes the problem •Includes a discussion of the literature that is selective, synthetic, analytical, and thematic Component 3: Theory The theory that is applied or developed Is appropriate • Is logically interpreted • Is well understood • Aligns with the question at hand In addition, the author shows comprehension of the theory's • Strengths • Limitations Component 4: Methods The methods applied or developed are • Appropriate • Described in detail
  • 17. Where to go for help Lovitts, B. E. (2005). How to grade a dissertation. Academe, 91(6), 18-23. http://doctoralnet.com Exercise: Turn to your neighbour and give them three ways according to this list that you feel your thesis will make the outstanding mark.
  • 18. What can you do to make sure yours meets these criteria? Thomson, P. (2014). Preparing for the PhD oral exam. Retrieved from http://patthomson.wordpress.com/2014/04/17/preparing-for-the-phd-oral-exam/
  • 19. Tests and Trials •Read it all out loud! Listen for your voice. •Analyse for areas of strength and weakness •Read up on the questions most frequently asked •Practice so you are assured you will be: •Confident •Non defensive •Have skills breathing when stressed
  • 20. Now its your turn to share… What questions still lurk in your brain? What are your “take aways” from today’s session? Links of interest: Examiner report form is available at: http://www.dcu.ie/sites/default/files/registry/word/PGR6 .pdf institutional repository is at : http://doras.dcu.ie/ alana@doctoralnet.com