What is Rapid Innovation
•Transferir como PPT, PDF•
2 gostaram•2,175 visualizações
Presentation given to JISC Innovation Group on 22 July 2010.
![[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Semelhante a What is Rapid Innovation
Semelhante a What is Rapid Innovation (20)
Mais de David F. Flanders
Mais de David F. Flanders (11)
Último
Último (20)
What is Rapid Innovation
- 5. Part 1 (Top Down) – The Strategic Significance of Rapid Innovation
- 6. DEGREE OF CHANGE in Technology / Software DEGREE OF CHANGE in Practice / Process 2 1 4 3
- 7. % of CHANGE in Technology / Software % of CHANGE in Practice / Processes 2 1 3 Project Outputs: a.) YES process changed b.) YES tools changed 4 Programme
- 8. % of CHANGE in Technology / Software % of CHANGE in Practice / Processes 2 1 4 3 Project Output: a.) Use of a new process within a community Project Output: a.) Use of a new technology in a community Programme
- 9. % of CHANGE in Technology / Software % of CHANGE in Practice / Processes 2 1 4 3 Project Output: a.) Develop and use a new technology i.e. jiscRI, vreRI, distribVLE, fsdRI, etc. Programme
- 11. Part 2 (Bottom-up) - Pragmatics of Implementing an RI Programme
- 17. “ If you want to succeed, double your failure rate” - Tom Watson (IBM) -
- 18. % of CHANGE in Technology / Software % of CHANGE in Practice / Processes 2 1 3 ? Programme 4 Programme
- 19. COMMUNITY RI ? RI ? Process Change Tool Change Q4
Notas do Editor
- Aka I’m looking for censure! What are your guiding principles, what are your emergent properties?
- Incremental Innovation = low risk / low gain Semi-Radical Innovation = implementing new practices: change the ways in which humans do things Semi Radical Innovation = New technology: change the tools with which humans work Radical Innovation = Change both practice and tools (high risk / high gain) The innovation lifecycle Innovation (or positive change) within the education sector operates through numerous lifecycles through an innovation lifecycle. Each institution takes its own approach to deciding how best to invest and at what point in its funding cycles. This may be a long process; five years of planning and investment may be required to change institutional systems and processes in order to make best use of the potential that technology has to offer. JISC reflects this cycle of change. Its activities operate through a lifecycle of innovation. As the JISC funds both programmes and services, it is able to work with the education sector to look for trends and key influences that may affect the way that education and research are carried out, and respond to these through its activities. The JISC will capture the most relevant trends in technology, in institutional infrastructure, in learner, teacher and researcher behaviour and requirements. This happens at a macro level, in response to a large change in research assessment, for example, and at a micro level, for example to explore whether the JISC Services should adopt web 2.0 technologies. JISC takes a balanced approach to promoting innovation. Innovation takes place in two areas – the JISC’s services and infrastructure and innovation within the sector. JISC Innovation programmes sometimes introduce new services and products, including advice and guidance. They also fund enhancements to existing services, as well as identifying needs for new services through interaction with the sector. Many of the innovation programmes that it delivers aims to enhance systems, processes and practices in the sector. A distinction is also often drawn between incremental and radical innovation. Incremental innovation involves small improvements, which if engaged in continuously may result in significant changes. However each step is characterised by low risk and small gain. Radical innovation by contrast usually involves a break with the past, as for example advocated by business process reengineering. This carries higher risk, but with potentially greater gain. In practice these are combined in different ways and can be set out in a four quadrant matrix.
- Diagram: Systems/ Practice/Process vs. Software/Service Innovation In general, innovation investment has a balanced spread across this matrix. However, JISC’s emphasises “taking the risks that institutions would not normally take themselves” while institutions tend to be responsible for low risk incremental innovation. Overall, JISC Innovation seeks to balance its investment portfolio largely in the remaining three quadrants of semi-radical and radical innovation, with some activities attempting to support good practices and processes without significant change to existing software and services, while others seek to introduce innovative new services and software that fit into existing practices and processes without demanding significant change, although the majority of innovation efforts will require both in varying degrees. JISC is in the unique position of being funded by and embedded within the adoption community it serves. This puts it in a position where it is more easily able to: Identify current and future needs of the community Study the current situation in which issues and concerns arise Survey and study emerging technologies, filtered by community needs Iteratively work with the community through the innovation development cycle with stakeholder input and feedback Pilot outputs and address identified barriers to adoption All of these help to mitigate the risks associated with innovation. To take full advantage of JISC’s unique position, it needs to increase the balance of its resources that it puts into these activities, correspondingly reducing the number of projects that it funds. This will enable it to still cover the full range of risk in its portfolio, while increasing the likelihood of successfully realising benefits. The time to invest in innovation is during a recession so as to be well placed to make the most of the upswing when it arrives. So, while the appetite for innovation in the sector may be lower at the present, within a few years, it should be increasing again. This suggests that as far as possible JISC Innovation activities should maintain its risk profile.
- Typical JISC projects (12-18 Months / £100-200K) usually (due to a competitive bid process) promise the world by claiming they will change both the processes within the institution and the tools used by end users. The irony in this is the orthoganol nature of these two activities in UK HEIs. Changing process usually requires a political activity from a project, especially a project manager (e.g. sitting on committees, meeting with other heads of departments, organising activities, etc). On the other hand changing tool sets usually requires working with developers and end users (organising usability groups, testing tool use, surveying the adoption of the tool, writing instruction documentation and training end users, etc.). These two activities are not a natural skills set for a project to have under one budget line. In short, JISC projects that attempt to achieve both usually fail (though this is the very nature of risk management), and often learning from failures is the path to achieving success in changing both process and tools.
- So we’ve started to experiment in the area of RI for changing the way tools and technology are used with end users (the successful RI projects base themselves off of a known end user need, where the process is not the primary thing that needs changing).
- 40 projects funded NN amount of money Success rate of %% No of projects went on to find further funding... WHAT DOES SMT CARE ABOUT? SP/RB Million Plus Mission Group: “'in HEIs without access to substantial research funding streams, even sums of £30,000 can have a profound impact on project activity and individual careers”
- “ It’s like this: engineering is all about constraint... But these days, there’s not much traditional constraint. I’ve got the engineer’s most dangerous luxury: plenty.”
- See “The Agile Manifesto” and My Presentation on “Agile in Academia” [2] End User (Client) Centric User preference, over architectural style Speed of delivery, over perfection of system Scratching an itch, over creating a solution Intimate Team based = iterative + reflective Daily stand up, over quarterly meetings Fortnightly delivery deadlines over end of project deadlines Progress measured by user feedback over self assessment.
- The programme is just another project, not a parent node (...well, a meta-project) =>code.google.com/p/jiscri Projects can not market themselves until they have a product to market, =>projectTag.wordpress.com The lessons learned from the projects are as valuable as the products they produce, =>tags+feeds The most significant thing projects are doing is being part of a larger problem solving community, =>devCSI
- http://code.google.com/p/jiscri/ http://code.google.com/p/jisclms/ http://code.google.com/p/jiscexpo/ http://code.google.com/p/jiscdepo/ Freddie’s VRERI programme notebook: http://code.google.com/p/vreri/
- Immediate solutions over defining a problem space (low hanging fruit / disruptive innovation) = “ short iterative projects” Skills of the project team over comprehensive stakeholder input= embrace the small motivated team * effort of Providing products that end users can interact with over producing documentation = developing solutions End user engagement over comprehensive strategic engagement hand-in-hand * with the end user *.
- Incremental Innovation = low risk / low gain Semi-Radical Innovation = implementing new practices: change the ways in which humans do things Semi Radical Innovation = New technology: change the tools with which humans work Radical Innovation = Change both practice and tools (high risk / high gain) A = Exploratory projects examining how things could change. B = Strategic projects implementing new technologies based on exploratory findings. A+B = Expose and Discover C = Deposit i = expert briefing papers and community guidance The innovation lifecycle Innovation (or positive change) within the education sector operates through numerous lifecycles through an innovation lifecycle. Each institution takes its own approach to deciding how best to invest and at what point in its funding cycles. This may be a long process; five years of planning and investment may be required to change institutional systems and processes in order to make best use of the potential that technology has to offer. JISC reflects this cycle of change. Its activities operate through a lifecycle of innovation. As the JISC funds both programmes and services, it is able to work with the education sector to look for trends and key influences that may affect the way that education and research are carried out, and respond to these through its activities. The JISC will capture the most relevant trends in technology, in institutional infrastructure, in learner, teacher and researcher behaviour and requirements. This happens at a macro level, in response to a large change in research assessment, for example, and at a micro level, for example to explore whether the JISC Services should adopt web 2.0 technologies. JISC takes a balanced approach to promoting innovation. Innovation takes place in two areas – the JISC’s services and infrastructure and innovation within the sector. JISC Innovation programmes sometimes introduce new services and products, including advice and guidance. They also fund enhancements to existing services, as well as identifying needs for new services through interaction with the sector. Many of the innovation programmes that it delivers aims to enhance systems, processes and practices in the sector. A distinction is also often drawn between incremental and radical innovation. Incremental innovation involves small improvements, which if engaged in continuously may result in significant changes. However each step is characterised by low risk and small gain. Radical innovation by contrast usually involves a break with the past, as for example advocated by business process reengineering. This carries higher risk, but with potentially greater gain. In practice these are combined in different ways and can be set out in a four quadrant matrix Software/Services Diagram: Systems/ Practice/Process vs. Software/Service Innovation In general, innovation investment has a balanced spread across this matrix. However, JISC’s emphasises “taking the risks that institutions would not normally take themselves” while institutions tend to be responsible for low risk incremental innovation. Overall, JISC Innovation seeks to balance its investment portfolio largely in the remaining three quadrants of semi-radical and radical innovation, with some activities attempting to support good practices and processes without significant change to existing software and services, while others seek to introduce innovative new services and software that fit into existing practices and processes without demanding significant change, although the majority of innovation efforts will require both in varying degrees. JISC is in the unique position of being funded by and embedded within the adoption community it serves. This puts it in a position where it is more easily able to: Identify current and future needs of the community Study the current situation in which issues and concerns arise Survey and study emerging technologies, filtered by community needs Iteratively work with the community through the innovation development cycle with stakeholder input and feedback Pilot outputs and address identified barriers to adoption All of these help to mitigate the risks associated with innovation. To take full advantage of JISC’s unique position, it needs to increase the balance of its resources that it puts into these activities, correspondingly reducing the number of projects that it funds. This will enable it to still cover the full range of risk in its portfolio, while increasing the likelihood of successfully realising benefits. The time to invest in innovation is during a recession so as to be well placed to make the most of the upswing when it arrives. So, while the appetite for innovation in the sector may be lower at the present, within a few years, it should be increasing again. This suggests that as far as possible JISC Innovation activities should maintain its risk profile.