Microsoft has changed its perspective on open source software and now supports open source models and ecosystems. It competes with open source products as it does any other competing products. Microsoft promotes customer choice by participating in ecosystems that include both open source and proprietary software. Microsoft engages with the open source community through partnerships, communities, technology research, and commitments to transparency and innovation. However, open source software is not always the best solution and different types of software and different stakeholder needs must be considered to determine what solution provides the best value.
9. Microsoft’s Open Source Engagements partnerships communities technology research 5,000,000 developers 75,000 partners 18,000,000 visits to Port25 75% Firefox 20% Linux/Unix 4,500,000 Channel9 visitors 5,000 Microsoft bloggers 40,000 Codeplex users hypervisor collaboration PHP optimization MySQLConnector to Visual Studio Linux / Windows interoperability System Center X-Plat OpenPegasus 3,800+ CodePlex projects 170,000+ Sourceforge projects 77K Windows 17K Windows-only 5K+ .NET 1,000,000 LoC on MSDN & TechNet 588 Shared Source license projects AIDS vaccine research tools usability / HCI research multi-year funded academic projects
10. Microsoft’s Open Source Engagements partnerships communities technology research 5,000,000 developers 75,000 partners 18,000,000 visits to Port25 75% Firefox 20% Linux/Unix 4,500,000 Channel9 visitors 5,000 Microsoft bloggers 40,000 Codeplex users hypervisor collaboration PHP optimization MySQLConnector to Visual Studio Linux / Windows interoperability System Center X-Plat OpenPegasus 3,800+ CodePlex projects 170,000+ Sourceforge projects 77K Windows 17K Windows-only 5K+ .NET 1,000,000 LoC on MSDN & TechNet 588 Shared Source license projects AIDS vaccine research tools usability / HCI research multi-year funded academic projects
11. Microsoft’s Open Source Commitments policy participation transparency innovation Open Source Interoperability Initiative Open Source ISV Forum Interoperability Forum Interoperability Vendor Alliance Windows Academic Program Microsoft Partner Program microsoft.com /opensource Patent Pledge for Open Source developers Interoperability Principles Open Specification Promise Port25 CodePlex SourceForge open protocol specifications standards support data portability Shared Source programs Open Source Software Lab Technology Visual Studio Express Visual Web Developer Express SQL Server Express, Compact Windows Server SE (DreamSpark) Office Live, Live Workspaces Popfly XNA Game Studio Robotics Studio (non-commercial) .NET Framework SharePoint Learning Kit ASP.NET AJAX IronPython, IronRuby ODF/OXML Translators Windows Installer XML Toolset Research PhotoSynth Haskell Programming Language Health Design Tools Machine Learning & Appl. Stat. Windows Research Kernel (WRK)
19. Open Source… audience philosophy model free!? OSS – Open Source Software FOSS – Free/Open Source Software FLOSS – Free/Libre/Open Source Software available source freeware / shareware etc. end user business executive architect manager developer system administrator etc. development approach licensing marketing monetization support services etc.
22. zero cost good enough lower complexity security more open cross-platform no vendor lock-in co mmunity-dr iv en de velopment Unclear trade-offs lower ongoing cost more complete features backwards compatibility more secure open standards interoperability commitment on support managed developm e nt open source software vendors proprietary software vendors
23. total cost feature set security open standards interoperability manageability reliability scalability etc. Rational, analytical decision
24. initial costs acquisition and deployment ongoing costs maintenance and end user costs benefits benefits to the organization It’s about VALUE
25. Open Source Microsoft Office? development model licensing model business model free for end-users? alternative revenue models such as services contracts, advertising, hardware OEM cost-shifting, fee-by-feature, etc.? how to ensure strategic direction alignment across a complex set of software projects and components? community-driven distributed collaboration vs. centrally coordinated and orchestrated development and maintenance how to maintain a centralized and specialized team of developers? e.g., ~2000 developers contributed to a year’s worth of Linux kernel releases (2.6.16 to 2.6.20), and the majority of developers are paid for this work (+60%) similarly (% paid), Eclipse: 86.9% MySql: 92.8%