SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 5
Historical MonographHitler’s Empire: How the Nazis ruled Europeby Mark Mazower Danielle Barrington Professor Arguello History 5 13 August 2010
A General Uncertainty Prior to reading this historical monograph, I had the impression of Hitler as a leader with his end goal in sight from the very beginning. However, this book showed me that Hitler really had no plans as to the future of his empire; he made decisions only when he absolutely needed to.   Even the decision to kill what he believed to be “lower races” of people, such as Jews, came about slowly and in a disorganized state.  While Hitler knew that he wanted his perfect empire that would rival that of Rome, he didn’t know how he would achieve it. Murdering millions of people was a solution thrown together somewhat haphazardly.
The Third Reich Despite this uncertainty, Hitler’s massive military could accomplish virtually anything.  The Third Reich, as it came to be known, was an authoritarian overflow.  There were army men, SS men, party bosses, civil servants, businessmen, ideologues, institutions, and individuals with power under Hitler’s rule, and they caused quite a bit of rivalry within the Reich.  They fought for a racially defined Germany with the help of international collaborators who sided with the Germans mostly because of self-interest. When Germany began losing the war, this support died until there was nobody left to offer help; all those on the extreme side of the Nazis ended up as casualties of the war.
The Use of Terror All of these different branches of the regime were able to come to such power because of one major force: fear. By exercising extreme brutality and fearlessness with absolutely no hesitation, any resistance that considered standing up to Hitler’s army were immediately silenced out of fear.  It is possible that the brutal means of killing those races that Hitler believed were below the status of Aryan races was done as a means of deterring any resistance. It is also probable to say that this worked, as the United States and other countries around the world refused to get involved in the Nazi military’s business despite knowing the severity of the actions.
The Silver Lining The Nazi regime’s brutality is what eventually forced the rest of the world to get involved and put an end to a horrific rule like that of Hitler.  Without such a terrible precedent, it could have been possible for other dictators to gain control and abuse their power in other countries without fear of intervention.   The United States was able to play an important role and establish itself as a superpower of the world. As the author writes, “the war was the end of Europe as the maker of norms and world policeman… Henceforth, international order would emerge on a different basis, guided by different hands.”   In this sense, the war was necessary because it shows the world the importance of acting justly, rather than avoiding action because of fear.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Cold War
Cold WarCold War
Cold Warjaloisi
 
Outbreak of the Cold War
Outbreak of the Cold WarOutbreak of the Cold War
Outbreak of the Cold Warlennyambrosini
 
Top 20 significant characters of the civil war
Top 20 significant characters of the civil warTop 20 significant characters of the civil war
Top 20 significant characters of the civil warEujene Yum
 
The American Revolution by Cierra
The American Revolution by CierraThe American Revolution by Cierra
The American Revolution by Cierralfelts2011
 
Der fuhrerprinzip , adolf hitler leadership style ( michael toney , mike toney )
Der fuhrerprinzip , adolf hitler leadership style ( michael toney , mike toney )Der fuhrerprinzip , adolf hitler leadership style ( michael toney , mike toney )
Der fuhrerprinzip , adolf hitler leadership style ( michael toney , mike toney )Mike Toney, MBA
 
English History
English HistoryEnglish History
English HistoryPAULA
 
Monroe Doctrine
Monroe DoctrineMonroe Doctrine
Monroe Doctrineajlevings
 
The United States and declaring war
The United States and declaring warThe United States and declaring war
The United States and declaring warBob Mayer
 
McCarthyism & The Crucible
McCarthyism & The CrucibleMcCarthyism & The Crucible
McCarthyism & The CrucibleMichael Maslak
 
The revolutionary war
The revolutionary warThe revolutionary war
The revolutionary warbadfart123
 

Mais procurados (18)

Cold War
Cold WarCold War
Cold War
 
Outbreak of the Cold War
Outbreak of the Cold WarOutbreak of the Cold War
Outbreak of the Cold War
 
Top 20 significant characters of the civil war
Top 20 significant characters of the civil warTop 20 significant characters of the civil war
Top 20 significant characters of the civil war
 
PPT - Monroe Doctrine - IIB1
PPT - Monroe Doctrine - IIB1PPT - Monroe Doctrine - IIB1
PPT - Monroe Doctrine - IIB1
 
Cold war
Cold warCold war
Cold war
 
Monroe Doctrin
Monroe DoctrinMonroe Doctrin
Monroe Doctrin
 
Agent carter
Agent carterAgent carter
Agent carter
 
The American Revolution by Cierra
The American Revolution by CierraThe American Revolution by Cierra
The American Revolution by Cierra
 
Der fuhrerprinzip , adolf hitler leadership style ( michael toney , mike toney )
Der fuhrerprinzip , adolf hitler leadership style ( michael toney , mike toney )Der fuhrerprinzip , adolf hitler leadership style ( michael toney , mike toney )
Der fuhrerprinzip , adolf hitler leadership style ( michael toney , mike toney )
 
Monroe Doctrine
Monroe DoctrineMonroe Doctrine
Monroe Doctrine
 
English History
English HistoryEnglish History
English History
 
7.5
7.57.5
7.5
 
Cold War
Cold WarCold War
Cold War
 
Monroe Doctrine
Monroe DoctrineMonroe Doctrine
Monroe Doctrine
 
The United States and declaring war
The United States and declaring warThe United States and declaring war
The United States and declaring war
 
McCarthyism & The Crucible
McCarthyism & The CrucibleMcCarthyism & The Crucible
McCarthyism & The Crucible
 
The revolutionary war
The revolutionary warThe revolutionary war
The revolutionary war
 
Monroe doctrine
Monroe doctrineMonroe doctrine
Monroe doctrine
 

Semelhante a Historical monograph

Hitler’s aims and aspirations
Hitler’s aims and aspirationsHitler’s aims and aspirations
Hitler’s aims and aspirationsElizabeth Lugones
 
Mein Kampf
Mein KampfMein Kampf
Mein Kampfbigmalc
 
Mein Kampf
Mein KampfMein Kampf
Mein Kampfbigmalc
 
Essay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docx
Essay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docxEssay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docx
Essay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docxelbanglis
 
Essay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docx
Essay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docxEssay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docx
Essay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docxrusselldayna
 
Rise New Leaders & Ideas - Europe 1930s
Rise New Leaders & Ideas - Europe 1930sRise New Leaders & Ideas - Europe 1930s
Rise New Leaders & Ideas - Europe 1930smrbjwalters
 
Charismatic leadership
Charismatic leadershipCharismatic leadership
Charismatic leadershipPhilip Aligwe
 

Semelhante a Historical monograph (12)

Fuhrerprinzip
FuhrerprinzipFuhrerprinzip
Fuhrerprinzip
 
Hitler’s aims and aspirations
Hitler’s aims and aspirationsHitler’s aims and aspirations
Hitler’s aims and aspirations
 
Mein Kampf
Mein KampfMein Kampf
Mein Kampf
 
Mein Kampf
Mein KampfMein Kampf
Mein Kampf
 
Essay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docx
Essay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docxEssay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docx
Essay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docx
 
Essay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docx
Essay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docxEssay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docx
Essay 1 400 – 700 wordsOn July 27, 1936, President Franklin Roo.docx
 
Hitler and totalitarianism
Hitler and totalitarianismHitler and totalitarianism
Hitler and totalitarianism
 
Holocaust Essay
Holocaust EssayHolocaust Essay
Holocaust Essay
 
Essay On Hitler Vs. Stalin
Essay On Hitler Vs. StalinEssay On Hitler Vs. Stalin
Essay On Hitler Vs. Stalin
 
Rise New Leaders & Ideas - Europe 1930s
Rise New Leaders & Ideas - Europe 1930sRise New Leaders & Ideas - Europe 1930s
Rise New Leaders & Ideas - Europe 1930s
 
Charismatic leadership
Charismatic leadershipCharismatic leadership
Charismatic leadership
 
Essay About The Holocaust
Essay About The HolocaustEssay About The Holocaust
Essay About The Holocaust
 

Historical monograph

  • 1. Historical MonographHitler’s Empire: How the Nazis ruled Europeby Mark Mazower Danielle Barrington Professor Arguello History 5 13 August 2010
  • 2. A General Uncertainty Prior to reading this historical monograph, I had the impression of Hitler as a leader with his end goal in sight from the very beginning. However, this book showed me that Hitler really had no plans as to the future of his empire; he made decisions only when he absolutely needed to. Even the decision to kill what he believed to be “lower races” of people, such as Jews, came about slowly and in a disorganized state. While Hitler knew that he wanted his perfect empire that would rival that of Rome, he didn’t know how he would achieve it. Murdering millions of people was a solution thrown together somewhat haphazardly.
  • 3. The Third Reich Despite this uncertainty, Hitler’s massive military could accomplish virtually anything. The Third Reich, as it came to be known, was an authoritarian overflow. There were army men, SS men, party bosses, civil servants, businessmen, ideologues, institutions, and individuals with power under Hitler’s rule, and they caused quite a bit of rivalry within the Reich. They fought for a racially defined Germany with the help of international collaborators who sided with the Germans mostly because of self-interest. When Germany began losing the war, this support died until there was nobody left to offer help; all those on the extreme side of the Nazis ended up as casualties of the war.
  • 4. The Use of Terror All of these different branches of the regime were able to come to such power because of one major force: fear. By exercising extreme brutality and fearlessness with absolutely no hesitation, any resistance that considered standing up to Hitler’s army were immediately silenced out of fear. It is possible that the brutal means of killing those races that Hitler believed were below the status of Aryan races was done as a means of deterring any resistance. It is also probable to say that this worked, as the United States and other countries around the world refused to get involved in the Nazi military’s business despite knowing the severity of the actions.
  • 5. The Silver Lining The Nazi regime’s brutality is what eventually forced the rest of the world to get involved and put an end to a horrific rule like that of Hitler. Without such a terrible precedent, it could have been possible for other dictators to gain control and abuse their power in other countries without fear of intervention. The United States was able to play an important role and establish itself as a superpower of the world. As the author writes, “the war was the end of Europe as the maker of norms and world policeman… Henceforth, international order would emerge on a different basis, guided by different hands.” In this sense, the war was necessary because it shows the world the importance of acting justly, rather than avoiding action because of fear.