Margaret ledwith northampton lecture 3 6 dec 2011 (7)
1. Community Development: Placatory
practice or transformative practice?
Margaret Ledwith
Emeritus Professor of Community
Development and Social Justice
University of Cumbria, UK
2. Community development
The practice of social justice
Contextualised in political times
Poverty analyses
Human rights analyses
3. CD Praxis: a contested space
between top-down and bottom-up
CD principles: social/environmental justice
CD vision: just and sustainable world
CD process: popular education for
participatory democracy
CD theory: analyses of power
CD values: ideology of equality
4. Values frame the quality and
purpose of CD
Ideology of equality
Trust
Dignity
Respect
Reciprocity
Mutuality
Cooperative not competitive worldview
5. 1995: National Occupational
Standards for CD
Based on structural analysis:
Equality and Anti-discrimination
Social Justice
Collective Action
Community Empowerment
Working and Learning Together – questioning
answers not answering questions
6. Placatory practice is
decontextualised practice!
Bailout of banks
Global recession
Countries in crisis: USA, Eurozone
Austerity measures hit poor hardest
TUC ‘women and cuts toolkit’
7. Poverty
Is UK poverty a human rights issue? (Killeen, 2008)
Strong on empowerment, weak on equality
No structural analysis of poverty
Charity not redistribution of wealth
Responsibility over rights
2020: absolute poverty for 800,000 more children
CPAG: Big Society unlawful re Child Poverty Act,
2010
8. Human rights
Dignity and worth of every individual
Regardless of race, gender, language,
religion, opinions, wealth or ability
Apply to every human being everywhere
1989 UN Convention on Rights of the Child
What a child needs to survive, grow,
participate and fulfil their potential
Every child, regardless of who or where
9. August Riots:
Criminalising children
UNICEF criticised UK judicial system for
locking up children
Breach international law on children’s rights
Children in custody most disadvantaged
Cuts in youth services
10. CHILD POVERTY:
A yardstick for social justice
z ‘The true measure of a
nation’s standing is how
well it attends to its
children – their health
and safety, their material
security, their education
and socialization, and
their sense of being
loved, valued, and
included in the families
and societies into which
they are born’
(UNICEF, 2007: 1).
11. Poverty discriminates
Lone-parent households
Low paid households
Households without an adult in paid work
Minority ethnic families
‘Dis’abled children or those with a
‘dis’abled parent
Looked after children
12. EQUALITY:
Does every child matter?
27% of children from white families
36% Indian
41% Black Caribbean
47% Black non-Caribbean
69% Pakistani and Bangladeshi
Source: Child Poverty Action Group (2008) Child Poverty: The stats, London:CPAG
13. POVERTY KILLS:
Making critical connections!
Low birthweight, infant death, childhood
accidents
Underachievement at school, truancy or
exclusion
Low self esteem, low expectations
Teenage pregnancy
Youth suicide
Malnutrition
Unemployment and low wages
Homelessness
Long-term illness (morbidity)
Premature death (mortality)
14. Reflection and dialogue
What does the statement ‘placatory
practice is decontextualised practice’
mean to you?
How do you see this in relation to your
own practice?
26. Reflection and dialogue
What theory underpins your practice?
How do you see the potential for
collective action in your practice?
Share your thoughts with the person next
to you.
27. 2: Community profiling
Working with not on people!
People researching their own
community
Working with CD values
Giving voice to local people
30. Presenting the profile
Life-changing experience – proud and empowered
Owned by the community
A community launch
Provokes wider critical thought
Weaves a unity of theory and practice
Involves more people in CD
Determines next stage
31. Reflection and dialogue
How does community profiling offer an
opportunity to develop transformative
practice rather than placatory practice?