This document outlines the criteria for selecting the best performing cooperative development councils. It lists eligibility requirements including being in operation for at least 3 years and having relevant cooperative programs. Councils must submit documentation like development plans and reports. Selection is based on an evaluation across 5 categories relating to organization, programs, networking, social responsibility, and recognition. Organization and programs each account for 30-50 points, while networking, social responsibility, and recognition make up the remaining 20 points. Criteria within each category assess factors such as membership levels, elections, meetings, activities conducted, partnerships, and community involvement. The council that receives the highest total points following this evaluation process will be selected as best performing.

1. Best Performing
Cooperative
Development
Council

2. CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT
COUNCILS
Eligibility criteria • Must come from the region
• Existing for at least 3 years
• Active for the last 3 years
• With relevant cooperative development programs
• Must be endorsed/ nominated by government
organizations, Non- government organizations, or
cooperative in the area;
• Adhere to the provisions of MC for CDCs;
Documentary
Requirements
• 3- year Development Plan;
• Manual of Operation
• Policies and Procedures
• List of Officers
• Accomplishment reports (2012-2013)
• Certificate of recognition from different
organizations

3. SUMMARY OF CRITERIA/ POINTS FOR EVALUATION
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
I. Organization, Leadership and
Management
30
II. Program Implementation 50
III. Network and Linkaging 10
IV. Social Responsibility 5
V. Recognition/Citation received 5

4. CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
I. Organization, Leadership and Management 30
1. Composition of councils
total no. of existing members
--------------------------------- x 100
total no. of members per MC
above 90%
75% below 90%
50% - below 75
below 50%
5
5
3
2
1
2. Conduct of election as scheduled in the MC 2013- 01 5
• conduct on the scheduled date
• Not conducted on the scheduled dare
• No election
5
5
0

5. CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
3. Conduct of Meetings 5
total no. of meetings conducted
--------------------------------- x 100
total no. of meetings per MC
90% - 100%
75% below 90%
50% - below 75
below 50%
5
4
3
2
4. Presence of Development or Action
Plan with:
• with development or action plan
• no action plan
5
5
0

6. CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
6. Implementation
• Full Implementation
• Partial Implementation
• no Implementation
5
5
3
0
7. Resource Generation and Utilization
• with resource generated & utilized for program
implementation
• no resource generated & utilized for program
implementation
Resource generated:
% of utilization:
Source:
5
5
0

7. CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
II. Program Implementation 50
1. No. of activities conducted/ Implemented to
coordinate/ monitor the different programs of the
government
5 activities & above
4 Activities
3 activities
2 activities
1 activity
8
6
4
2
1
2. no. of activities conducted to operational and monitor
the Phil. Medium Term Cooperative Development Plan
5 activities & above
4 Activities
3 activities
2 activities
1 activity
8
6
4
2
1

8. CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
3. No. of consultations conducted to review the PCMTDP
2 or more consultations
1 consultations
6
6
3
4. Participation in the review/ assessment of the PCMTDP
3 and above activities
2 activities
1 activity
6
6
4
2
5. Sharing of resource towards the implementation of
development plans and programs
6
a. Presence of policies on resource sharing among the
membership of the council
with policy/ies
no policy
2
2
0
b. No. of members- agencies shared their resources to the council
above 5
2-4
1
4
4
2
0

9. CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
6. Assistance and participation in the holding of
cooperative activities such as but not limited to the
celebration of cooperative month, coordination of
scheduled cooperative congress trainings and summits,
etc.
6
a. No. of activities assisted
above 5
2-4
1
3
3
2
1
b. No. of activities participated in
above 5
2- 4
1
3
3
2
1

10. CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
7. Promotional and Development of Coops/ movement 10
• Provisions of assistance in the organization of
cooperatives
•Promotion of membership in cooperatives (e.g. effort,
strategies to promote coops, newsletter)
• Issuance and resolutions on cooperative development
• Advocacy/ participation to the local and international
conferences, summits, conventions, etc.
• organizations/ reactivation of CDCs at the
Provincial/Municipal/City level
2
2
2
2
2

11. CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
III. Network and Linkaging 10
1. no. of organizations with formal partnership/ forged
MOA
3 and above organizations
2 organizations
1 organization
3
3
2
1
2. No. of international partnership established on coop
development
3 and above organizations
2 organizations
1 organization
3
3
2
1
3. No. of programs/ activities conducted along partnership
established
3 and above organizations
2 organizations
1 organization
4
4
3
2

12. CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
IV. Social responsibility 5
Social responsibility to community (i.e. calamity
assistance, medical mission, feeding program,
environmental protection)
5 and above activities participated
4 activities participated
3 activities participated
2 activities participated
1 activities participated
No activity participated
5
4
3
2
1
0

13. CRITERIA FOR BEST PERFORMING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS
EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHT/ POINTS
V. Recognition/ citation 5
Awards/ recognition/ citation/
commendation received for the past
three years
International awards received
Local awards received
3
2

14. For Information and Dissemination
Josefina B. Bitonio
OIC Director
Encoder
Eric Justine R. Ancheta
OJT – University of Luzon
Summer 2014