SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 13
Experimental Research: Where cause meets effect
Characteristics of an experiment
• IV is the variable selected and tested by the researcher to assess
  effects on the DV (i.e participants responses)
• It is assumed that changes in the DV will result after exposure to the
  IV.
• IV and potential unwanted variables (e.g extranious variables) are
  controlled
• Use of random allocation of participants to different conditions
  (groups) ensures uniform distributed participant characteristics
  that can affect the DV.
Variables
Independent variable – the variable that is changed by the
 experimenter, interested in its effect. We want to see the effect of
 the IV on the DV



             Dependent Variable – measures the effect of the
             IV, see if the IV has effected the DV
Activity
Experimental group and Control group


Experimental group: Participants
exposed to the treatment condition, i.e
the IV manipulation.


                     Control group: Participants not
                     exposed to the IV manipulation.
The Research Hypothesis
Hypothesis – a testable prediction relating to the outcome of the
research being conducted, a prediction that one variable (IV) will
effect another variable (DV) in a certain way.
Example
Research Question: Does smoking marijuana effect driving
performance?

 Independent Variable - smoking marijuana

 Dependent Variable - driving performance


It is hypothesised that participants who smoke marijuana
will perform worse on a driving test as compared to
participants who have not smoked marijuana
The Operational Hypothesis
Variables that need to be operationalised
Smoking Marijuana
Driving Performance
The population – who we are testing
Operational Definitions
Smoking Marijuana – smoking one joint containing 500
milligrams of pure marijuana (not mixed with tobacco) 20
minutes before taking a driving test
Driving Performance -% score on VIC Roads, “Are you Road
Ready?”driving simulator
Population - Victorian drivers aged 18 – 25
The Operational Hypothesis

It is hypothesized that Victorian drivers aged 18 – 25 who
have smoked marijuana (smoking one joint containing
500 milligrams of pure marijuana 20 minutes before
taking a driving test) will perform worse on a driving test
(obtain a lower % score on the VIC Roads “Are you Road
Ready?” driving simulator) compared to participants who
have not smoked marijuana.
Activity
Extraneous and Confounding Variables
Extraneous Variable: Any variable, other than the IV, that can
cause a change in the DV and therefore affect the results of an
experiment in an unwanted way. An extraneous variable may
become a confounding variable.



                            Confounding variable: Any variable,
                            other than the IV, that is uncontrolled
                            and allowed to change together with
                            the IV, thereby having an unwanted
                            effect on the DV
Activity

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais de coburgpsych

Brain function – the evidence from brain damage
Brain function – the evidence from brain damageBrain function – the evidence from brain damage
Brain function – the evidence from brain damage
coburgpsych
 

Mais de coburgpsych (20)

Values
ValuesValues
Values
 
Strenghts defining moments
Strenghts defining moments Strenghts defining moments
Strenghts defining moments
 
Purpose
PurposePurpose
Purpose
 
Labeling
LabelingLabeling
Labeling
 
Lesson 2 judgement of flavours
Lesson 2   judgement of flavoursLesson 2   judgement of flavours
Lesson 2 judgement of flavours
 
Lesson 1 visual illusion
Lesson 1   visual illusionLesson 1   visual illusion
Lesson 1 visual illusion
 
Lesson 6 influences on tate perception
Lesson 6   influences on tate perceptionLesson 6   influences on tate perception
Lesson 6 influences on tate perception
 
Lesson 5 taste perception - mouth to brain
Lesson 5   taste perception - mouth to brainLesson 5   taste perception - mouth to brain
Lesson 5 taste perception - mouth to brain
 
Perceptual constancy and set
Perceptual constancy and setPerceptual constancy and set
Perceptual constancy and set
 
Gestalt rules 20016
Gestalt rules 20016Gestalt rules 20016
Gestalt rules 20016
 
Lesson 1 physiological and psychological charactertistics of responses to s...
Lesson 1   physiological and psychological charactertistics of responses to s...Lesson 1   physiological and psychological charactertistics of responses to s...
Lesson 1 physiological and psychological charactertistics of responses to s...
 
Gestalt rules
Gestalt rulesGestalt rules
Gestalt rules
 
Depth cues
Depth cuesDepth cues
Depth cues
 
From the eye to the brain
From the eye to the brainFrom the eye to the brain
From the eye to the brain
 
Sensation and perception
Sensation and perceptionSensation and perception
Sensation and perception
 
Lesson 3 attachment and emotional development
Lesson 3   attachment and emotional developmentLesson 3   attachment and emotional development
Lesson 3 attachment and emotional development
 
Lesson 2 sensitive and critical periods
Lesson 2   sensitive and critical periodsLesson 2   sensitive and critical periods
Lesson 2 sensitive and critical periods
 
Lesson 1 life span development
Lesson 1   life span developmentLesson 1   life span development
Lesson 1 life span development
 
Brain function – the evidence from brain damage
Brain function – the evidence from brain damageBrain function – the evidence from brain damage
Brain function – the evidence from brain damage
 
Lesson 1 plasticity
Lesson 1   plasticityLesson 1   plasticity
Lesson 1 plasticity
 

The experimental research where cause meets effect

  • 1. Experimental Research: Where cause meets effect
  • 2. Characteristics of an experiment • IV is the variable selected and tested by the researcher to assess effects on the DV (i.e participants responses) • It is assumed that changes in the DV will result after exposure to the IV. • IV and potential unwanted variables (e.g extranious variables) are controlled • Use of random allocation of participants to different conditions (groups) ensures uniform distributed participant characteristics that can affect the DV.
  • 3. Variables Independent variable – the variable that is changed by the experimenter, interested in its effect. We want to see the effect of the IV on the DV Dependent Variable – measures the effect of the IV, see if the IV has effected the DV
  • 5. Experimental group and Control group Experimental group: Participants exposed to the treatment condition, i.e the IV manipulation. Control group: Participants not exposed to the IV manipulation.
  • 6. The Research Hypothesis Hypothesis – a testable prediction relating to the outcome of the research being conducted, a prediction that one variable (IV) will effect another variable (DV) in a certain way.
  • 7. Example Research Question: Does smoking marijuana effect driving performance? Independent Variable - smoking marijuana Dependent Variable - driving performance It is hypothesised that participants who smoke marijuana will perform worse on a driving test as compared to participants who have not smoked marijuana
  • 8. The Operational Hypothesis Variables that need to be operationalised Smoking Marijuana Driving Performance The population – who we are testing Operational Definitions Smoking Marijuana – smoking one joint containing 500 milligrams of pure marijuana (not mixed with tobacco) 20 minutes before taking a driving test Driving Performance -% score on VIC Roads, “Are you Road Ready?”driving simulator Population - Victorian drivers aged 18 – 25
  • 9. The Operational Hypothesis It is hypothesized that Victorian drivers aged 18 – 25 who have smoked marijuana (smoking one joint containing 500 milligrams of pure marijuana 20 minutes before taking a driving test) will perform worse on a driving test (obtain a lower % score on the VIC Roads “Are you Road Ready?” driving simulator) compared to participants who have not smoked marijuana.
  • 11. Extraneous and Confounding Variables Extraneous Variable: Any variable, other than the IV, that can cause a change in the DV and therefore affect the results of an experiment in an unwanted way. An extraneous variable may become a confounding variable. Confounding variable: Any variable, other than the IV, that is uncontrolled and allowed to change together with the IV, thereby having an unwanted effect on the DV
  • 12.

Notas do Editor

  1. \n
  2. \n
  3. \n
  4. \n
  5. \n
  6. \n
  7. \n
  8. \n
  9. \n
  10. \n
  11. \n
  12. \n
  13. \n