SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 26
Innovation & Entrepreneurship:
    Some Facts & Figures

            Jay Rao
           Professor
            Babson
Role of Entrepreneurs in the U.S.

• In the U.S. typically 600,000 new businesses are formed
  each year (one every minute). This number has been
  consistent for the last 30 years.
• Historically through the last seven recessions it's been
  entrepreneurs who essentially restarted the U.S. economy
• Today 1/3 of the current GDP is created by firms that did
  not exist in 1980
• 75 percent of most firms’ startup capital is made up in equal
  parts of owner equity and bank loans and/or credit card
  debt

                                                Source: Kauffman Foundation
Survival of Startups

• First year: 85%
  Second: 70%
  Third:      62%
  Fourth:     55%
  Fifth:      50%
  Sixth:      47%
  Seventh: 44%
  Eighth:     41%
  Ninth:      38%
  Tenth:      35%
• "Once you've hit five years, your odds of survival go way up,
  only two to three percent of businesses older than five shut
  down each year.“ – David Birch
                                                  Source: David Birch, U.S. DoL
The structure of the U.S. economy

• More than 50% of all businesses are home-based and over
  72% are sole-operator (as of 2006). The average business
  bring in $45,000 per year.

• Only 6% of firms had revenues of more than $1 million.

• SBA defines “big business” as firms over 500 employees. By
  definition 99% of all businesses in the U.S. are small
  businesses.


                                            Source: Invisible Capital, Chris Rabb
The structure of the U.S. Economy (cont’d)

• More than 6 million businesses in the U.S. only 18,000 (less
  than 1%) of them are classified as “big business” (more than
  500 employees).

• 49% of the U.S. workforce approximately (120 million) was
  employed by less than 1% of all employers.

• Firms over 2,500 employees account for 64% of the U.S.
  workforce, even though they make up less than 1% of all
  firms.
Some Global Data on Midmarket

•   Typically businesses with < 999 employees
•   65% of Global GDP
•   90% of Global workforce
•   90% of all businesses across the globe are SMBs
•   Midmarket generates 13x more patents per employee vs.
    Enterprise segment




                                             Source: VP, GMU Mid Market, IBM
U.S. Firms, Labor & Employment


Employment by Firm Size     # of Firms     % of Firms # of Employees % of Employees

Non-Employers (zero FTEs)    21,708,021       78.21%      21,708,021        15.25%

1-4 FTEs                       3,705,275      13.35%       6,139,463         4.31%

5-9 FTEs                       1,705,092       6.14%      15,630,773        10.98%

20-99 FTEs                      532,391        1.92%      20,922,960        14.70%

100-499 FTEs                     88,586        0.32%      17,173,728        12.07%

500+ FTEs                        18,311        0.07%      60,737,341        42.68%

Total                        27,757,676        100%     142,312,286       100.00%

Source: 2007 County Business Patters and 2007 Economic Census
2009 Study of 550 high-growth founders




                           Source: Kauffman Foundation
High Growth Entrepreneurs: Not the
        brightest in college
High Growth Entrepreneurs: Don’t come
          from great wealth
High Growth Entrepreneurs: Better
    educated than their parents
High Growth Entrepreneurs: Didn’t come
         from family business
High Growth Entrepreneurs: Not Young!
High Growth Entrepreneurs: Had
 significant industry experience!
Where do high-growth entrepreneurs come
                                from?
• HP turned down Steve Wozniak’s initial designs for the personal
  computer and was not given a chance to work on the team at HP
  (1976)
   – The same design becomes Apple 1
• Arthur Blank and Bernard Marcus (founders of Home Depot) fired
  from Handy Dan Home Improvement chain (1979)
• Texas Instruments rejects Rod Canion’s designs for PC clones, he
  leaves with two of his colleagues to start Compaq (1982)
• John Lasseter left Disney to join George Lucas (1984)
   – Steve Jobs bought it for $10 million to become known as Pixar
• Judy George got fired from Scandinavian Design (1985)
   – Created Domain Home Furnishings
• Jeffrey Katzenberg left Disney to team with Steven Spielberg to from
  Dreamworks (1994)

                                                                     15
Where do high-growth entrepreneurs come
                            from? (cont’d)
• SVP Thomas Watson leaves National Cash Register (NCR) to
  form IBM
• Robert Ryan, a rising star at Digital leaves to form Ascend
• Sabeer Bhatia leaves Apple to form Hotmail, later sold to
  Microsoft
• Dr. William Shockley leaves Bell Labs and moves to California
  to start Shockley Semiconductors
   – 8 key people leave Shockley to form Fairchild Semiconductor
   – 3 key people leave Fairchild to form Intel (1968)
   – In total Shockley Semiconductors was a catalyst for forming 30 Silicon
     Valley ventures
       • Intel, National Semiconductor, AMD, Teledyne, Rheem, LSI Logic, Kleiner
         Perkins

                                                                       16
Where do high-growth entrepreneurs come
                             from? (cont’d)
1954    Shockley moves to CA
1957    Shockley Semiconductor has 50 employees
1965    14 Semiconductor spinoff firms
1970    35 Semiconductor firms
1975    54 Semiconductor firms
1980    63 Semiconductor firms
1986    102 Semiconductor firms

Between 1947 and 1986,
129 Semiconductor firms
Were launched in Silicon Valley




                                                  17
•    Founded by Ken Olsen in 1967
•    First Firm to be funded by venture capital
•    DEC’s PDP-8 is considered the first mini-computer
•    1972 revenues = $6.5 billion
•    1989 revenues = $14 billion



                                                APOLLO
                              WANG             COMPUTER,          WAYNE
                                                  INC.




                                                           Source: Christensen
    19
All Firms Die!
                       Number of Firms in the U.S. Typewriter Industry                                              Number of Firms in the U.S. Automobile Industry
                  90
                  80
                                                                        Entry                                  75
                  70
Number of Firms




                                                                        Exit                                   70
                  60
                                                                        Total                                                                      50% of U.S. products in
                  50
                                                                                                               65                                  all-steel closed body
                  40                                                                                                                               80% of U.S. products in
                                                                                                               60
                  30                                                                                                                               all-steel closed body
                  20                                                                                           55
                  10
                                                                                                               50
                  0
                       74 77 80 83 86 89 92 95 98 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 36 38                       45                                                       Entry




                                                                                             Number of Firms
                                           Years (1874 to 1936)                                                                                                         Exit
                                                                                                               40
                                                                                                                                                                        Total
                  Number of Firms in the U.S. Picture Tube Producers                                           35
                  90
                  80                                                                                           30

                  70                                                    Entry
                                                                                                               25
Number of Firms




                                                                        Exit
                  60
                                                                        Total                                  20
                  50
                  40                                                                                           15

                  30                                                                                           10
                  20
                                                                                                               5
                  10
                  0                                                                                            0
                       49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70                       1900      1910    1920      1930      1940        1950           1960
                                            Years (1949 to 1970)                                                                   Years (1900 to 1960)

                                                                                Source: Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Uttberback                    20
Corporate Mortality is also very high!

• Average life expectancy of all firms, regardless of size, measured in Japan
  and much of Europe, is only 12.5 years
• The average life span of a multinational organization – Fortune 500 or
  equivalent – is around 45 years
• Only 16% of firms listed on the 1957 S&P 500 remained on the 2007 list.
• One third of the companies listed in the Fortune 500 in 1970 for example,
  had disappeared by 1983 – acquired, merged or broken to pieces
• Of the top 500 firms in the U.S. in 1980, only 202 had survived by the year
  2000.
• The first S&P index of 90 major U.S. firms was created in the 1920s. The
  firms on that original list stayed there for an average of 65 years. By 1998,
  the average tenure of a firm on the expanded S&P 500 was 10 years.
Like human beings, firms are constantly being born that cannot
  live. Others may meet…death from accident or illness. Still
  others die a “natural” death, as men die of old age. And the
“natural” cause, in the case of firms, is precisely their inability to
keep up the pace in innovating which they themselves had been
        instrumental in setting in the time of their vigor.

         Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical,
         and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process (New York: McGraw-Hill)
23
24
Year    Age (in                            Year        Age (in                              Year        Age (in
Company Name

3M                          1902
                                     What can we learn from “The Old
                         Started 2007)
                                              Company Name

                                      105 Eaton
                                                                    Started
                                                                         1911
                                                                                2007)
                                                                                               Company Name

                                                                                          96Northrop Grumman
                                                                                                                     Started
                                                                                                                          1939
                                                                                                                                 2007)
                                                                                                                                           68
Abbott Laboratories
Alcoa
                            1888
                            1886
                                               Masters”?
                                      119 Eli Lilly
                                      121 Exxon Mobil
                                                                         1876
                                                                         1882
                                                                                      131Owens Corning
                                                                                      125Owens-Illinois
                                                                                                                          1938
                                                                                                                          1929
                                                                                                                                           69
                                                                                                                                           78
Altria Group                1847      160 Fortune Brands                 1890         117Paccar                           1905         102
American Standard           1875      132 General Dynamics               1952             55PepsiCo                       1898         109
Anheuser-Busch              1852      155 General Electric               1890         117Pfizer                           1849         158
Archer Daniels Midland      1902      105 General Mills                  1928             79Phelps Dodge                  1834         173
Ashland                     1924           83 General Motors             1908             99PPG Industries                1883         124
Avon Products               1886      121 Georgia-Pacific                1927             80Procter & Gamble              1837         170
Boeing                      1910           97 Gillette                   1901         104Raytheon                         1922             85
Bristol-Myers Squibb        1887      120 Goodyear Tire & Rubber         1898         109Rockwell Automation              1903         104
Campbell Soup               1869      138 Heinz (H.J.)                   1869         138Rohm & Haas                      1907         100
Caterpillar                 1925           82 Hershey Foods              1894         113Sunoco                           1886         121
Chevron Texaco              1879      128 International Paper            1898         109Textron                          1923             84
Coca-Cola                   1886      121 Intl. Business Machines        1889         118Unisys                           1873         134
Colgate-Palmolive           1806      201 Johnson & Johnson              1887         120United Technologies              1853         154
ConocoPhillips              1875      132 Kellogg                        1906         101Unocal                           1890         117
Crown Holdings              1892      115 Kimberly-Clark                 1872         135USG                              1902         105
Cummins                     1919           88 Lockheed Martin            1912             95Weyerhaeuser                  1900         107
Dana                        1904      103 Marathon Oil                   1887         120Whirlpool                        1911             96
Deere                       1838      169 McGraw-Hill                    1909             98Wyeth                         1860         147
Dow Chemical                1897      110 Merck                          1891         116 AVERAGE                                      115
DuPont                      1802      205 Motorola                       1928             79
Eastman Kodak               1888      119 Navistar International         1902         105
                                                                                                               Source:25
                                                                                                                       Fortune, April 5, 2004
Some empirical findings about Innovations

• More than 90% of all innovations that ultimately become
  successful started off in the wrong direction.
• Given more money and time, firms are known to pursue the
  wrong strategies for a longer period of time.
• Most new innovations are started without access to credit in
  good times and bad.
• Most of the great businesses today started without a lot of
  VC funding or with any bank lending until 5-6 years after
  they were up and running.


                                                 Source: Innosight

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a U.S. Entrepreneurship Stats & Survival Rates

Presentación TechBa - Csoftmty
Presentación TechBa - CsoftmtyPresentación TechBa - Csoftmty
Presentación TechBa - CsoftmtyCsoftmty Monterrey
 
Business plan presentation v10.0
Business plan presentation v10.0Business plan presentation v10.0
Business plan presentation v10.0Darshan Shah
 
Government Role in supporting small business in South Africa
Government Role in supporting small business in South AfricaGovernment Role in supporting small business in South Africa
Government Role in supporting small business in South AfricaZapreneur
 
Pilot presentation 071812
Pilot presentation 071812Pilot presentation 071812
Pilot presentation 071812Jim Gavigan
 
Pilot presentation 071812
Pilot presentation 071812Pilot presentation 071812
Pilot presentation 071812Generic Logical
 
Pilot presentation 071812
Pilot presentation 071812Pilot presentation 071812
Pilot presentation 071812Jim Gavigan
 
Global Corporate Reputation Index
Global Corporate Reputation IndexGlobal Corporate Reputation Index
Global Corporate Reputation IndexBurson-Marsteller
 
Value Creation through Networks
Value Creation through NetworksValue Creation through Networks
Value Creation through NetworksRobin Teigland
 
Us policy economic_sfif_pres_jun_9_ver2
Us policy economic_sfif_pres_jun_9_ver2Us policy economic_sfif_pres_jun_9_ver2
Us policy economic_sfif_pres_jun_9_ver2tapask7889
 
Characteristics of the Vietnamese Business Environment: Evidence from a SME S...
Characteristics of the Vietnamese Business Environment: Evidence from a SME S...Characteristics of the Vietnamese Business Environment: Evidence from a SME S...
Characteristics of the Vietnamese Business Environment: Evidence from a SME S...UNU-WIDER
 
AKT Construction: New day new strategy June 2, 2011 FMI presentation
AKT Construction: New day new strategy June 2, 2011 FMI presentationAKT Construction: New day new strategy June 2, 2011 FMI presentation
AKT Construction: New day new strategy June 2, 2011 FMI presentationpeggykitzmiller
 
Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity
Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, AusterityCanadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity
Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, AusterityLeft Streamed
 
Lednovation
LednovationLednovation
Lednovationasorce
 
Lednovation
LednovationLednovation
Lednovationasorce
 

Semelhante a U.S. Entrepreneurship Stats & Survival Rates (20)

Matsushita3
Matsushita3Matsushita3
Matsushita3
 
Presentación TechBa - Csoftmty
Presentación TechBa - CsoftmtyPresentación TechBa - Csoftmty
Presentación TechBa - Csoftmty
 
Business plan presentation v10.0
Business plan presentation v10.0Business plan presentation v10.0
Business plan presentation v10.0
 
Government Role in supporting small business in South Africa
Government Role in supporting small business in South AfricaGovernment Role in supporting small business in South Africa
Government Role in supporting small business in South Africa
 
What is the BIG Idea? by Paul Ahlstrom
What is the BIG Idea? by Paul AhlstromWhat is the BIG Idea? by Paul Ahlstrom
What is the BIG Idea? by Paul Ahlstrom
 
Pilot presentation 071812
Pilot presentation 071812Pilot presentation 071812
Pilot presentation 071812
 
Pilot presentation 071812
Pilot presentation 071812Pilot presentation 071812
Pilot presentation 071812
 
Pilot presentation 071812
Pilot presentation 071812Pilot presentation 071812
Pilot presentation 071812
 
Global Corporate Reputation Index
Global Corporate Reputation IndexGlobal Corporate Reputation Index
Global Corporate Reputation Index
 
Value Creation through Networks
Value Creation through NetworksValue Creation through Networks
Value Creation through Networks
 
Us policy economic_sfif_pres_jun_9_ver2
Us policy economic_sfif_pres_jun_9_ver2Us policy economic_sfif_pres_jun_9_ver2
Us policy economic_sfif_pres_jun_9_ver2
 
Explaining the Great Recession and Anemic Job Recovery: The Role of Falterin...
Explaining the Great Recession and Anemic  Job Recovery: The Role of Falterin...Explaining the Great Recession and Anemic  Job Recovery: The Role of Falterin...
Explaining the Great Recession and Anemic Job Recovery: The Role of Falterin...
 
The Xcelerator Effect
The Xcelerator EffectThe Xcelerator Effect
The Xcelerator Effect
 
Characteristics of the Vietnamese Business Environment: Evidence from a SME S...
Characteristics of the Vietnamese Business Environment: Evidence from a SME S...Characteristics of the Vietnamese Business Environment: Evidence from a SME S...
Characteristics of the Vietnamese Business Environment: Evidence from a SME S...
 
AKT Construction: New day new strategy June 2, 2011 FMI presentation
AKT Construction: New day new strategy June 2, 2011 FMI presentationAKT Construction: New day new strategy June 2, 2011 FMI presentation
AKT Construction: New day new strategy June 2, 2011 FMI presentation
 
Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity
Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, AusterityCanadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity
Canadian (Non)Exceptionalism: Crisis, Recovery, Austerity
 
Lednovation
LednovationLednovation
Lednovation
 
Lednovation
LednovationLednovation
Lednovation
 
MtB Italy Tour 2010, Torino
MtB Italy Tour 2010, TorinoMtB Italy Tour 2010, Torino
MtB Italy Tour 2010, Torino
 
Eventyret Apple Haugesund
Eventyret Apple HaugesundEventyret Apple Haugesund
Eventyret Apple Haugesund
 

Último

8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptxThe-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptxmbikashkanyari
 
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdfDigital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdfJos Voskuil
 
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMMemorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMVoces Mineras
 
Organizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful BusinessOrganizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful BusinessSeta Wicaksana
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Chapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal audit
Chapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal auditChapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal audit
Chapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal auditNhtLNguyn9
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Anamaria Contreras
 
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...Americas Got Grants
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchirictsugar
 
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfAPRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfRbc Rbcua
 
PSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement PresentationPSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement PresentationAnamaria Contreras
 
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...ssuserf63bd7
 
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdfDarshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdfShashank Mehta
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?Olivia Kresic
 
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Riya Pathan
 

Último (20)

8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
 
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptxThe-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
 
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdfDigital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
Digital Transformation in the PLM domain - distrib.pdf
 
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMMemorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
 
Organizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful BusinessOrganizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful Business
 
No-1 Call Girls In Goa 93193 VIP 73153 Escort service In North Goa Panaji, Ca...
No-1 Call Girls In Goa 93193 VIP 73153 Escort service In North Goa Panaji, Ca...No-1 Call Girls In Goa 93193 VIP 73153 Escort service In North Goa Panaji, Ca...
No-1 Call Girls In Goa 93193 VIP 73153 Escort service In North Goa Panaji, Ca...
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
 
Enjoy ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida Escorts Delhi NCR
Enjoy ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida Escorts Delhi NCREnjoy ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida Escorts Delhi NCR
Enjoy ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida Escorts Delhi NCR
 
Chapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal audit
Chapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal auditChapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal audit
Chapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal audit
 
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North GoaCall Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
 
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
 
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfAPRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
 
PSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement PresentationPSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
 
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
 
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdfDarshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
 
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
 
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
 

U.S. Entrepreneurship Stats & Survival Rates

  • 1. Innovation & Entrepreneurship: Some Facts & Figures Jay Rao Professor Babson
  • 2. Role of Entrepreneurs in the U.S. • In the U.S. typically 600,000 new businesses are formed each year (one every minute). This number has been consistent for the last 30 years. • Historically through the last seven recessions it's been entrepreneurs who essentially restarted the U.S. economy • Today 1/3 of the current GDP is created by firms that did not exist in 1980 • 75 percent of most firms’ startup capital is made up in equal parts of owner equity and bank loans and/or credit card debt Source: Kauffman Foundation
  • 3. Survival of Startups • First year: 85% Second: 70% Third: 62% Fourth: 55% Fifth: 50% Sixth: 47% Seventh: 44% Eighth: 41% Ninth: 38% Tenth: 35% • "Once you've hit five years, your odds of survival go way up, only two to three percent of businesses older than five shut down each year.“ – David Birch Source: David Birch, U.S. DoL
  • 4. The structure of the U.S. economy • More than 50% of all businesses are home-based and over 72% are sole-operator (as of 2006). The average business bring in $45,000 per year. • Only 6% of firms had revenues of more than $1 million. • SBA defines “big business” as firms over 500 employees. By definition 99% of all businesses in the U.S. are small businesses. Source: Invisible Capital, Chris Rabb
  • 5. The structure of the U.S. Economy (cont’d) • More than 6 million businesses in the U.S. only 18,000 (less than 1%) of them are classified as “big business” (more than 500 employees). • 49% of the U.S. workforce approximately (120 million) was employed by less than 1% of all employers. • Firms over 2,500 employees account for 64% of the U.S. workforce, even though they make up less than 1% of all firms.
  • 6. Some Global Data on Midmarket • Typically businesses with < 999 employees • 65% of Global GDP • 90% of Global workforce • 90% of all businesses across the globe are SMBs • Midmarket generates 13x more patents per employee vs. Enterprise segment Source: VP, GMU Mid Market, IBM
  • 7. U.S. Firms, Labor & Employment Employment by Firm Size # of Firms % of Firms # of Employees % of Employees Non-Employers (zero FTEs) 21,708,021 78.21% 21,708,021 15.25% 1-4 FTEs 3,705,275 13.35% 6,139,463 4.31% 5-9 FTEs 1,705,092 6.14% 15,630,773 10.98% 20-99 FTEs 532,391 1.92% 20,922,960 14.70% 100-499 FTEs 88,586 0.32% 17,173,728 12.07% 500+ FTEs 18,311 0.07% 60,737,341 42.68% Total 27,757,676 100% 142,312,286 100.00% Source: 2007 County Business Patters and 2007 Economic Census
  • 8. 2009 Study of 550 high-growth founders Source: Kauffman Foundation
  • 9. High Growth Entrepreneurs: Not the brightest in college
  • 10. High Growth Entrepreneurs: Don’t come from great wealth
  • 11. High Growth Entrepreneurs: Better educated than their parents
  • 12. High Growth Entrepreneurs: Didn’t come from family business
  • 14. High Growth Entrepreneurs: Had significant industry experience!
  • 15. Where do high-growth entrepreneurs come from? • HP turned down Steve Wozniak’s initial designs for the personal computer and was not given a chance to work on the team at HP (1976) – The same design becomes Apple 1 • Arthur Blank and Bernard Marcus (founders of Home Depot) fired from Handy Dan Home Improvement chain (1979) • Texas Instruments rejects Rod Canion’s designs for PC clones, he leaves with two of his colleagues to start Compaq (1982) • John Lasseter left Disney to join George Lucas (1984) – Steve Jobs bought it for $10 million to become known as Pixar • Judy George got fired from Scandinavian Design (1985) – Created Domain Home Furnishings • Jeffrey Katzenberg left Disney to team with Steven Spielberg to from Dreamworks (1994) 15
  • 16. Where do high-growth entrepreneurs come from? (cont’d) • SVP Thomas Watson leaves National Cash Register (NCR) to form IBM • Robert Ryan, a rising star at Digital leaves to form Ascend • Sabeer Bhatia leaves Apple to form Hotmail, later sold to Microsoft • Dr. William Shockley leaves Bell Labs and moves to California to start Shockley Semiconductors – 8 key people leave Shockley to form Fairchild Semiconductor – 3 key people leave Fairchild to form Intel (1968) – In total Shockley Semiconductors was a catalyst for forming 30 Silicon Valley ventures • Intel, National Semiconductor, AMD, Teledyne, Rheem, LSI Logic, Kleiner Perkins 16
  • 17. Where do high-growth entrepreneurs come from? (cont’d) 1954 Shockley moves to CA 1957 Shockley Semiconductor has 50 employees 1965 14 Semiconductor spinoff firms 1970 35 Semiconductor firms 1975 54 Semiconductor firms 1980 63 Semiconductor firms 1986 102 Semiconductor firms Between 1947 and 1986, 129 Semiconductor firms Were launched in Silicon Valley 17
  • 18.
  • 19. Founded by Ken Olsen in 1967 • First Firm to be funded by venture capital • DEC’s PDP-8 is considered the first mini-computer • 1972 revenues = $6.5 billion • 1989 revenues = $14 billion APOLLO WANG COMPUTER, WAYNE INC. Source: Christensen 19
  • 20. All Firms Die! Number of Firms in the U.S. Typewriter Industry Number of Firms in the U.S. Automobile Industry 90 80 Entry 75 70 Number of Firms Exit 70 60 Total 50% of U.S. products in 50 65 all-steel closed body 40 80% of U.S. products in 60 30 all-steel closed body 20 55 10 50 0 74 77 80 83 86 89 92 95 98 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 36 38 45 Entry Number of Firms Years (1874 to 1936) Exit 40 Total Number of Firms in the U.S. Picture Tube Producers 35 90 80 30 70 Entry 25 Number of Firms Exit 60 Total 20 50 40 15 30 10 20 5 10 0 0 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 Years (1949 to 1970) Years (1900 to 1960) Source: Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Uttberback 20
  • 21. Corporate Mortality is also very high! • Average life expectancy of all firms, regardless of size, measured in Japan and much of Europe, is only 12.5 years • The average life span of a multinational organization – Fortune 500 or equivalent – is around 45 years • Only 16% of firms listed on the 1957 S&P 500 remained on the 2007 list. • One third of the companies listed in the Fortune 500 in 1970 for example, had disappeared by 1983 – acquired, merged or broken to pieces • Of the top 500 firms in the U.S. in 1980, only 202 had survived by the year 2000. • The first S&P index of 90 major U.S. firms was created in the 1920s. The firms on that original list stayed there for an average of 65 years. By 1998, the average tenure of a firm on the expanded S&P 500 was 10 years.
  • 22. Like human beings, firms are constantly being born that cannot live. Others may meet…death from accident or illness. Still others die a “natural” death, as men die of old age. And the “natural” cause, in the case of firms, is precisely their inability to keep up the pace in innovating which they themselves had been instrumental in setting in the time of their vigor. Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process (New York: McGraw-Hill)
  • 23. 23
  • 24. 24
  • 25. Year Age (in Year Age (in Year Age (in Company Name 3M 1902 What can we learn from “The Old Started 2007) Company Name 105 Eaton Started 1911 2007) Company Name 96Northrop Grumman Started 1939 2007) 68 Abbott Laboratories Alcoa 1888 1886 Masters”? 119 Eli Lilly 121 Exxon Mobil 1876 1882 131Owens Corning 125Owens-Illinois 1938 1929 69 78 Altria Group 1847 160 Fortune Brands 1890 117Paccar 1905 102 American Standard 1875 132 General Dynamics 1952 55PepsiCo 1898 109 Anheuser-Busch 1852 155 General Electric 1890 117Pfizer 1849 158 Archer Daniels Midland 1902 105 General Mills 1928 79Phelps Dodge 1834 173 Ashland 1924 83 General Motors 1908 99PPG Industries 1883 124 Avon Products 1886 121 Georgia-Pacific 1927 80Procter & Gamble 1837 170 Boeing 1910 97 Gillette 1901 104Raytheon 1922 85 Bristol-Myers Squibb 1887 120 Goodyear Tire & Rubber 1898 109Rockwell Automation 1903 104 Campbell Soup 1869 138 Heinz (H.J.) 1869 138Rohm & Haas 1907 100 Caterpillar 1925 82 Hershey Foods 1894 113Sunoco 1886 121 Chevron Texaco 1879 128 International Paper 1898 109Textron 1923 84 Coca-Cola 1886 121 Intl. Business Machines 1889 118Unisys 1873 134 Colgate-Palmolive 1806 201 Johnson & Johnson 1887 120United Technologies 1853 154 ConocoPhillips 1875 132 Kellogg 1906 101Unocal 1890 117 Crown Holdings 1892 115 Kimberly-Clark 1872 135USG 1902 105 Cummins 1919 88 Lockheed Martin 1912 95Weyerhaeuser 1900 107 Dana 1904 103 Marathon Oil 1887 120Whirlpool 1911 96 Deere 1838 169 McGraw-Hill 1909 98Wyeth 1860 147 Dow Chemical 1897 110 Merck 1891 116 AVERAGE 115 DuPont 1802 205 Motorola 1928 79 Eastman Kodak 1888 119 Navistar International 1902 105 Source:25 Fortune, April 5, 2004
  • 26. Some empirical findings about Innovations • More than 90% of all innovations that ultimately become successful started off in the wrong direction. • Given more money and time, firms are known to pursue the wrong strategies for a longer period of time. • Most new innovations are started without access to credit in good times and bad. • Most of the great businesses today started without a lot of VC funding or with any bank lending until 5-6 years after they were up and running. Source: Innosight

Notas do Editor

  1. Statistically,; the probability that you&apos;ll get it right the first time out of the gate is very low. So,. In an environment where you&apos;ve got to push innovations out the door fast and keep the cost of innovation low, the probability that you&apos;ll be successful is actually much higher.If you give people a lot of money, it gives them the privilege of pursuing the wrong strategy for a very long time.