SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 12
JOB MATCHING REPORT

               PSYCHOLOGIST




   Personal details

Name and surname:
Date of birth:
Sex : female
Training : highschool
Occupational status: student
Address :
County : Dolj
Telephone number :


                Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM
CANDIDATE PROFILE


                                   Ability requirements

     Percentage of ability requirements match: 65, 63 %


    General learning ability

Description: The ability to assimilate new information, regroup them and operate with them
in order to solve problems. It includes focusing one’s attention and resisting interference;
ability to organize the information in one’s memory, cognitive inhibition and short-term
memory; there is also an operational component, consisting of: analytical judgment,
analogical transfer, work memory and flexible categorizing abilities.
Required level: 5 (very high learning abilities)
Acquired level: 4 (high learning abilities)




Results of the tests used to assess dimension: The general learning ability

                                              th
   Test: Analytical judgment (date of test: 10 of October 2012)
Test description: This test is used to measure the ability to discover new rules and use them in order to solve
reasoning problems.
Raw score: 15
Acquired level: 4 (good)




                                             th
   Test: Analogical transfer (date of test: 10 of October 2012)
Test description: This test measures the ability to determine the connections between various pairs of verbal
or figural elements and to apply them to other pairs.
Raw score: 26
Acquired level: 3 (medium)




   Test: Work memory (the test has not been submitted)
Test description: This test measures the ability to carry out several tasks at the same time.

Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM                                                                                      1
CANDIDATE PROFILE

   Test: Cognitive inhibition (the test has not been submitted)
Test description: This test measures the ability to focus.


    Verbal ability

Description: Understanding the meaning of the words and using them the right way, the
ability to combine them starting from certain set rules for combining words to make up
sentences and for combining sentences to make up phrases, the ability to read and
understand verbal or written information.
Required level: 4 (good verbal ability)
Acquired level: 3 (medium verbal ability)




Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Verbal ability

                                     th
   Test: Vocabulary (date of test: 10 of October 2012)
Test description: This test measures vocabulary-related knowledge.
Raw score: 11
Acquired level: 3 (medium)




    Numerical ability

Description: The ability to understand and use numerical contents, the speed and
correctness in doing basic mathematical calculations. The ability to analyze a problem and
use the appropriate method to solve it.
Required level: 3 (medium-high numerical ability)
Acquired level: 4 (high numerical ability)




Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Numerical ability



Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM                                                                   2
CANDIDATE PROFILE
                                                  th
   Test: Mathematical reasoning (date of test: 10 of October 2012)
Test description: This test measures the ability to perform mathematical reasoning.
Raw score: 8
Acquired level: 3 (medium)




    Spatial ability

Description: The ability to generate, remember and manage abstract visual images, the
ability to manipulate and organize spatial information.
Required level: 2 (low spatial ability)
Acquired level: 3 (medium spatial ability)




Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Spatial ability

                                            th
   Test: Spatial orientation (date of test: 10 of October 2012)
Test description: This test measures the ability to get spatially oriented.
Raw score: 13
Acquired level: 4 (good)




    Form perception ability

Description: The ability to acquire and organize visual information: discriminating a
background object, identifying the spatial position of objects (stimuli), the ability to detect form
constants and to perceive details.
Required level: 2 (low form perception ability)
Acquired level: 2 (low form perception ability)




Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM                                                                        3
CANDIDATE PROFILE
Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Form perception ability

                                                        th
   Test: Complex perceptual analysis (date of test: 10 of October 2012)
Test description: This test measures the ability to detect objects in complex graphical contexts.
Raw score: 6
Acquired level: 3 (medium)




    Clerical abilities

Description: The ability to identify significant details and mistakes in written materials and
tables.
Required level: 3 (medium clerical abilities)
Acquired level: 3 (medium clerical abilities)




Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Clerical abilities

                                          th
   Test: Clerical abilities (date of test: 11 of October 2012)
Test description: This test measures the ability to identify significant details and mistakes in written materials
and tables.
Raw score: 10
Acquired level: 3 (medium)




    Motor coordination

Description: The ability to have a quick reaction (with one’s hand, finger or leg) to a nerve
stimulus (light, sound, image), when the latter occurs. It indicates both motor coordination
and processing speed.
Required level: 4 (high motor coordination)
Acquired level: 3 (medium motor coodination)




Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM                                                                                           4
CANDIDATE PROFILE




Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Motor coordination

                                              th
   Test: Simple reaction test (date of test: 11 of October 2012)
Test description: This test measures the ability to have a quick reaction to the occurrence of a visual stimulus.
Raw score: 283
Acquired level: 3 (medium)




    Decision-making ability

Description: The rationality of the deciding person, their ability to choose the most
reasonable option out of a set of available options.
Required level: 4 (high decision-making ability)
Acquired level: 3 (medium decision-making ability)




Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Decision-making ability

                                                   th
   Test: Decision-making ability (date of test: 11 of October 2012)
Test description: This test measures the ability to make decisions.
Raw score: 4
Acquired level: 3 (medium)




Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM                                                                                     5
CANDIDATE PROFILE


                              Personality requirements

     Percentage of personality requirements match: 0,00 %


    Extraversion

Description: High psychological penchant towards things outside one’s own entity, focus on
the social and physical environment (objects, people). Intense desire to act over the
environment, action-orientation, communication ease, sociability, permanent need to
experiment.
Required level: 2 (extraversion level over the population average)
Acquired level: cannot be calculated




Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Extraversion


   Test: the CP5F personality questionnaire (test not submitted)
Test description: This questionnaire assesses the over factors of the Big Five model: Extraversion (E),
Amiability (A), Diligence (D), Emotional stability (S) and Autonomy (A).


    Amiability

Description: The ability to behave. Good will, amiable attitude, politeness, grace.
Required level: 3 (amiability level over the population average)
Acquired level: cannot be calculated




Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Amiability


   Test: The CP5F personality test (test not submitted)
Test description: This questionnaire assesses the over factors of the Big Five model: Extraversion (E),
Amiability (A), Diligence (D), Emotional stability (S) and Autonomy (A).

Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM                                                                                6
CANDIDATE PROFILE
    Diligence

Description: Being diligent; correctness, seriousness, scrupulousness. Purpose-oriented
behavior, exigency, meticulousness, rigor in achieving the set tasks by being aware of the
applicable rules
Required level: 2 (diligence level over the population average)
Acquired level: cannot be calculated




Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Diligence


   Test: The CP5F personality test (test not submitted)
Test description: This questionnaire assesses the over factors of the Big Five model: Extraversion (E),
Amiability (A), Diligence (D), Emotional stability (S) and Autonomy (A).


    Emotional stability

Description: The ability to maintain one’s emotional balance in stressful situations with no
extreme manifestations that may be unsuitable for the given situation.
Required level: 3 (emotional stability level over the population average)
Acquired level: cannot be calculated




Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Emotional stability


   Test: The CP5F personality test (test not submitted)
Test description: This questionnaire assesses the over factors of the Big Five model: Extraversion (E),
Amiability (A), Diligence (D), Emotional stability (S) and Autonomy (A).

    Autonomy-independence

Description: The ability to judge things and act independently, with no influence from other
people, in complete freedom.
Required level: 3 (autonomy-independence level over the population average)

Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM                                                                                7
CANDIDATE PROFILE
Acquired level: cannot be calculated




Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Diligence


   Test: The CP5F personality test (test not submitted)
Test description: This questionnaire assesses the over factors of the Big Five model: Extraversion (E),
Amiability (A), Diligence (D), Emotional stability (S) and Autonomy (A).



                   Occupational interests requirements

     Percentage of occupational interests requirements match: 33,33 %

                                                                    th
   Test : Interest assessment questionnaire (IAQ) (date of test: 11 of October 2012)
Test description: This questionnaire assesses the candidate’s occupational interests (preferences for certain
fields of knowledge or types of activities).

Results as compared to the questionnaire scales:


     Social interests

Scale description: It involves being oriented towards activities which require interpersonal
interaction– teaching preference or problem-solving preference.
Raw score: 17 (0 - 20)
Acquired level: 85%




     Conventional interests

Scale description: They involve a preference for those activities which involve a systematic,
orderly manipulation of data or objects in a well defined and well organized environment.
Raw score: 14 (0 - 20)
Acquired level: 70%




Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM                                                                                      8
CANDIDATE PROFILE
    Entrepreneurship interests

Scale description: They consist of a preference for those activities which allow for a sense
of initiative and of coordinating one’s own activities or a group’s activities.
Raw score: 14 (0 - 20)
Acquired level: 70%




    Artistic interests

Scale description: They take the form of an attraction towards less structured activities,
which involve a creative solution and allows for self-expression.
Raw score: 9 (0 - 20)
Acquired level: 45%




    Investigative interests

Scale description: They involve an attraction towards research and investigation, they can
take various forms and occur in various fields.
Raw score: 5 (0 - 20)
Acquired level: 25%




    Realistic interests

Scale description: They consist of a tendency to focus on those activities which involve the
use of objects, hands and tools.
Raw score: 4 (0 - 20)
Acquired level: 20%




Summary of the results of assessing occupational interests:



Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM                                                                     9
CANDIDATE PROFILE




A PSYCHOLOGIST’s job is a(n) (relevant interests):

    Investigative job
Description: Investigative occupations frequently imply working with ideas and require a
great deal of thinking. These occupations may include information research and mental
problem-solving. They involve research and investigation activities which take various forms
and occur in various fields (biology, physics, society, culture etc.). They usually require
mathematical and scientific abilities and work is most frequently individual (doctor, chemist,
mathematician, biologist, etc).


    Social job
Description: Social occupations often involve working and relating to people and teaching
them. They often require helping and providing support to others. They require interpersonal
interaction (teacher, counselor, therapist, etc).


    Entrepreneur’s job
Description: Such occupations frequently imply initiating and completing projects, leading
people and making decisions. Sometimes they involve taking chances and are often
business-related. They require team work, coordination and speaking and managing abilities
(manager, sales agent, etc).

A PSYCHOLOGIST’s job is a (n) (less relevant interests):

    Realistic job
Description: Realistic occupations often involve practical problems and solutions, handling
objects and instruments. They require physical, mechanical or technical abilities and they
most frequently occur in those professional environments which require an optimal level of
these abilities (driver, pilot, operator, farmer, etc).

Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM                                                                       10
CANDIDATE PROFILE


    Artistic job
Description: They involve working with shapes, sketches and plans (models). They often
require self expression and work can often be performed without complying with any sets of
strict rules. They are less structured jobs; they imply a creative solution to problems and
allow for self expression (musician, sculptor, writer, etc).


    Conventional job
Description: Conventional occupations often imply routines and following a set of
procedures. They can include working with details more than working with ideas. In these
occupations the coordinating authority is very clearly set. They are characterized by
administrative activities, involving the systematic and orderly manipulation of objects in a well
organized and well defined environment (secretary, librarian, clerk, etc).




                                                                                       Examiner,
                                                                             BALAN GEORGETA




Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM                                                                     11

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

38105795 standardized-tools
38105795 standardized-tools38105795 standardized-tools
38105795 standardized-toolshariom gangwar
 
Uses of language by Brown 1990
Uses of language by Brown 1990Uses of language by Brown 1990
Uses of language by Brown 1990Mahsa Farahanynia
 
Chapter 4( standardized testing)
Chapter 4( standardized testing)Chapter 4( standardized testing)
Chapter 4( standardized testing)Kheang Sokheng
 
Fulcher and Davidson Unit a5
Fulcher and Davidson Unit a5Fulcher and Davidson Unit a5
Fulcher and Davidson Unit a5Farzaneh Hamidi
 
History of aptitude
History of aptitudeHistory of aptitude
History of aptitudeKhim Cunanan
 
The differential aptitude test (dat)
The differential aptitude test (dat)The differential aptitude test (dat)
The differential aptitude test (dat)Muhammad Musawar Ali
 
Testing for Language Teachers
Testing for Language TeachersTesting for Language Teachers
Testing for Language Teachersmpazhou
 
Introduction to standard setting (cutscores)
Introduction to standard setting (cutscores)Introduction to standard setting (cutscores)
Introduction to standard setting (cutscores)Nathan Thompson
 
2016-04-13 research seminar presentation
2016-04-13 research seminar presentation2016-04-13 research seminar presentation
2016-04-13 research seminar presentationifi8106tlu
 
13research design
13research design 13research design
13research design tjhotman
 

Mais procurados (16)

38105795 standardized-tools
38105795 standardized-tools38105795 standardized-tools
38105795 standardized-tools
 
Uses of language by Brown 1990
Uses of language by Brown 1990Uses of language by Brown 1990
Uses of language by Brown 1990
 
Chapter 4( standardized testing)
Chapter 4( standardized testing)Chapter 4( standardized testing)
Chapter 4( standardized testing)
 
Malhotra05
Malhotra05Malhotra05
Malhotra05
 
Fulcher and Davidson Unit a5
Fulcher and Davidson Unit a5Fulcher and Davidson Unit a5
Fulcher and Davidson Unit a5
 
Chap5
Chap5Chap5
Chap5
 
History of aptitude
History of aptitudeHistory of aptitude
History of aptitude
 
The differential aptitude test (dat)
The differential aptitude test (dat)The differential aptitude test (dat)
The differential aptitude test (dat)
 
Testing for Language Teachers
Testing for Language TeachersTesting for Language Teachers
Testing for Language Teachers
 
tools of research
tools of researchtools of research
tools of research
 
Assessment
AssessmentAssessment
Assessment
 
Introduction to standard setting (cutscores)
Introduction to standard setting (cutscores)Introduction to standard setting (cutscores)
Introduction to standard setting (cutscores)
 
Testing
TestingTesting
Testing
 
2016-04-13 research seminar presentation
2016-04-13 research seminar presentation2016-04-13 research seminar presentation
2016-04-13 research seminar presentation
 
13research design
13research design 13research design
13research design
 
Acc guide
Acc guideAcc guide
Acc guide
 

Destaque

Prezentare curs lucrator comercial
Prezentare curs lucrator comercialPrezentare curs lucrator comercial
Prezentare curs lucrator comercialFpimm BV Ong
 
Dacia tanase daniela stop violentei
Dacia tanase daniela stop violenteiDacia tanase daniela stop violentei
Dacia tanase daniela stop violenteiGeorgeta Manafu
 
Givet newsletter n. 5-RO
Givet   newsletter n. 5-ROGivet   newsletter n. 5-RO
Givet newsletter n. 5-ROGeorgeta Manafu
 
Raport evaluare intrunire bulgaria-35 raspunsuri
Raport evaluare intrunire bulgaria-35 raspunsuriRaport evaluare intrunire bulgaria-35 raspunsuri
Raport evaluare intrunire bulgaria-35 raspunsuriGeorgeta Manafu
 
Presentation about malatya
Presentation about malatyaPresentation about malatya
Presentation about malatyaGeorgeta Manafu
 
The second transnational project meeting in vienna
The second transnational project meeting in viennaThe second transnational project meeting in vienna
The second transnational project meeting in viennaGeorgeta Manafu
 
The protection of nature
The protection of nature The protection of nature
The protection of nature Georgeta Manafu
 
Activities dedicated to the 9th of may,
Activities dedicated to the 9th of may,Activities dedicated to the 9th of may,
Activities dedicated to the 9th of may,Georgeta Manafu
 
Toleranta zuica si iagaru
Toleranta zuica si iagaruToleranta zuica si iagaru
Toleranta zuica si iagaruGeorgeta Manafu
 
Prof. dumitrache cristina liceul tehnologic dacia pitesti toleranta este pe p...
Prof. dumitrache cristina liceul tehnologic dacia pitesti toleranta este pe p...Prof. dumitrache cristina liceul tehnologic dacia pitesti toleranta este pe p...
Prof. dumitrache cristina liceul tehnologic dacia pitesti toleranta este pe p...Georgeta Manafu
 

Destaque (20)

Suport de curs
Suport de curs Suport de curs
Suport de curs
 
Presentation
PresentationPresentation
Presentation
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
 
Prezentare curs lucrator comercial
Prezentare curs lucrator comercialPrezentare curs lucrator comercial
Prezentare curs lucrator comercial
 
Toleranta 2014
Toleranta 2014Toleranta 2014
Toleranta 2014
 
Dacia tanase daniela stop violentei
Dacia tanase daniela stop violenteiDacia tanase daniela stop violentei
Dacia tanase daniela stop violentei
 
Diseminari ldv complet
Diseminari ldv completDiseminari ldv complet
Diseminari ldv complet
 
Craiova romania-1
Craiova romania-1Craiova romania-1
Craiova romania-1
 
Toleranta(4)
Toleranta(4)Toleranta(4)
Toleranta(4)
 
Newsletter 6 en
Newsletter 6 enNewsletter 6 en
Newsletter 6 en
 
Students’ survey
Students’ surveyStudents’ survey
Students’ survey
 
Givet newsletter n. 5-RO
Givet   newsletter n. 5-ROGivet   newsletter n. 5-RO
Givet newsletter n. 5-RO
 
Vet guidance spain
Vet guidance spainVet guidance spain
Vet guidance spain
 
Raport evaluare intrunire bulgaria-35 raspunsuri
Raport evaluare intrunire bulgaria-35 raspunsuriRaport evaluare intrunire bulgaria-35 raspunsuri
Raport evaluare intrunire bulgaria-35 raspunsuri
 
Presentation about malatya
Presentation about malatyaPresentation about malatya
Presentation about malatya
 
The second transnational project meeting in vienna
The second transnational project meeting in viennaThe second transnational project meeting in vienna
The second transnational project meeting in vienna
 
The protection of nature
The protection of nature The protection of nature
The protection of nature
 
Activities dedicated to the 9th of may,
Activities dedicated to the 9th of may,Activities dedicated to the 9th of may,
Activities dedicated to the 9th of may,
 
Toleranta zuica si iagaru
Toleranta zuica si iagaruToleranta zuica si iagaru
Toleranta zuica si iagaru
 
Prof. dumitrache cristina liceul tehnologic dacia pitesti toleranta este pe p...
Prof. dumitrache cristina liceul tehnologic dacia pitesti toleranta este pe p...Prof. dumitrache cristina liceul tehnologic dacia pitesti toleranta este pe p...
Prof. dumitrache cristina liceul tehnologic dacia pitesti toleranta este pe p...
 

Semelhante a Raport en

CHAPTER ONE pyschometrics new.pptx
CHAPTER ONE pyschometrics new.pptxCHAPTER ONE pyschometrics new.pptx
CHAPTER ONE pyschometrics new.pptxDejeneDay
 
psychometrics chapter one.pptx
psychometrics chapter one.pptxpsychometrics chapter one.pptx
psychometrics chapter one.pptxDejeneDay
 
LENGUAGE TESTING (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)
LENGUAGE TESTING (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)LENGUAGE TESTING (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)
LENGUAGE TESTING (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)Videoconferencias UTPL
 
Practical Language Testing by Fulcher (2010)
Practical Language Testing by Fulcher (2010)Practical Language Testing by Fulcher (2010)
Practical Language Testing by Fulcher (2010)Mahsa Farahanynia
 
The CTONI-2: Comprehensive Tests of Nonverbal Intelligence Second Edition
The CTONI-2: Comprehensive Tests of Nonverbal Intelligence Second EditionThe CTONI-2: Comprehensive Tests of Nonverbal Intelligence Second Edition
The CTONI-2: Comprehensive Tests of Nonverbal Intelligence Second EditionTanya Maria Geritsidou (Tantz Aerine)
 
Exciting Strategies for GED Test Preparation Instruction
Exciting Strategies for GED Test Preparation InstructionExciting Strategies for GED Test Preparation Instruction
Exciting Strategies for GED Test Preparation InstructionMeagen Farrell
 
Carp presentation
Carp   presentationCarp   presentation
Carp presentationMsMatthew
 
Administering,scoring and reporting a test ppt
Administering,scoring and reporting a test pptAdministering,scoring and reporting a test ppt
Administering,scoring and reporting a test pptManali Solanki
 
STANDARDIZED TESTS - JORGE YANZA.pdf
STANDARDIZED TESTS - JORGE YANZA.pdfSTANDARDIZED TESTS - JORGE YANZA.pdf
STANDARDIZED TESTS - JORGE YANZA.pdfjlyanza
 
Technological Problem Solving Seminar
Technological Problem Solving SeminarTechnological Problem Solving Seminar
Technological Problem Solving SeminarDavid Morrison-Love
 
Writing measurable objectives
Writing measurable objectivesWriting measurable objectives
Writing measurable objectivesrlii722
 
marketing - MK102_Session 4_2023_Final.pdf
marketing - MK102_Session 4_2023_Final.pdfmarketing - MK102_Session 4_2023_Final.pdf
marketing - MK102_Session 4_2023_Final.pdff20180184h
 
Mb0050 research methodology
Mb0050   research methodologyMb0050   research methodology
Mb0050 research methodologysmumbahelp
 
Factors affecting test scores and test evaluation in class
Factors affecting test scores and test evaluation in classFactors affecting test scores and test evaluation in class
Factors affecting test scores and test evaluation in classsteadyfalcon
 
Know how of question bank development
Know how of question bank developmentKnow how of question bank development
Know how of question bank developmentManoj Bhatt
 

Semelhante a Raport en (20)

CHAPTER ONE pyschometrics new.pptx
CHAPTER ONE pyschometrics new.pptxCHAPTER ONE pyschometrics new.pptx
CHAPTER ONE pyschometrics new.pptx
 
psychometrics chapter one.pptx
psychometrics chapter one.pptxpsychometrics chapter one.pptx
psychometrics chapter one.pptx
 
LENGUAGE TESTING (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)
LENGUAGE TESTING (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)LENGUAGE TESTING (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)
LENGUAGE TESTING (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)
 
Practical Language Testing by Fulcher (2010)
Practical Language Testing by Fulcher (2010)Practical Language Testing by Fulcher (2010)
Practical Language Testing by Fulcher (2010)
 
The CTONI-2: Comprehensive Tests of Nonverbal Intelligence Second Edition
The CTONI-2: Comprehensive Tests of Nonverbal Intelligence Second EditionThe CTONI-2: Comprehensive Tests of Nonverbal Intelligence Second Edition
The CTONI-2: Comprehensive Tests of Nonverbal Intelligence Second Edition
 
Exciting Strategies for GED Test Preparation Instruction
Exciting Strategies for GED Test Preparation InstructionExciting Strategies for GED Test Preparation Instruction
Exciting Strategies for GED Test Preparation Instruction
 
CARP
CARPCARP
CARP
 
Carp presentation
Carp   presentationCarp   presentation
Carp presentation
 
Administering,scoring and reporting a test ppt
Administering,scoring and reporting a test pptAdministering,scoring and reporting a test ppt
Administering,scoring and reporting a test ppt
 
STANDARDIZED TESTS - JORGE YANZA.pdf
STANDARDIZED TESTS - JORGE YANZA.pdfSTANDARDIZED TESTS - JORGE YANZA.pdf
STANDARDIZED TESTS - JORGE YANZA.pdf
 
Technological Problem Solving Seminar
Technological Problem Solving SeminarTechnological Problem Solving Seminar
Technological Problem Solving Seminar
 
PSYCHOLOGICAL GESTING.ppt
PSYCHOLOGICAL GESTING.pptPSYCHOLOGICAL GESTING.ppt
PSYCHOLOGICAL GESTING.ppt
 
Writing measurable objectives
Writing measurable objectivesWriting measurable objectives
Writing measurable objectives
 
marketing - MK102_Session 4_2023_Final.pdf
marketing - MK102_Session 4_2023_Final.pdfmarketing - MK102_Session 4_2023_Final.pdf
marketing - MK102_Session 4_2023_Final.pdf
 
Standardized test
Standardized testStandardized test
Standardized test
 
Mb0050 research methodology
Mb0050   research methodologyMb0050   research methodology
Mb0050 research methodology
 
Factors affecting test scores and test evaluation in class
Factors affecting test scores and test evaluation in classFactors affecting test scores and test evaluation in class
Factors affecting test scores and test evaluation in class
 
Know how of question bank development
Know how of question bank developmentKnow how of question bank development
Know how of question bank development
 
C11
C11C11
C11
 
C11
C11C11
C11
 

Mais de Georgeta Manafu (20)

Formular sel Tr Ankara
Formular sel  Tr AnkaraFormular sel  Tr Ankara
Formular sel Tr Ankara
 
Formular sel Mk
Formular sel MkFormular sel Mk
Formular sel Mk
 
Linkommunity C3
Linkommunity C3Linkommunity C3
Linkommunity C3
 
Gantt MY CODE SIBLING - MYCODESIB
Gantt MY CODE SIBLING - MYCODESIBGantt MY CODE SIBLING - MYCODESIB
Gantt MY CODE SIBLING - MYCODESIB
 
Ppt new werd - en
Ppt   new werd - enPpt   new werd - en
Ppt new werd - en
 
newWERD
newWERDnewWERD
newWERD
 
Ppt newWERD
Ppt   newWERDPpt   newWERD
Ppt newWERD
 
Linkommunity poster
Linkommunity posterLinkommunity poster
Linkommunity poster
 
Activ martie mai 2019-en
Activ martie mai 2019-enActiv martie mai 2019-en
Activ martie mai 2019-en
 
Formular draft
Formular   draftFormular   draft
Formular draft
 
Bb11ee109(1)
Bb11ee109(1)Bb11ee109(1)
Bb11ee109(1)
 
B9ae6301
B9ae6301B9ae6301
B9ae6301
 
Report on the monitoring of student safety and security in school
Report on the monitoring of student safety and security in schoolReport on the monitoring of student safety and security in school
Report on the monitoring of student safety and security in school
 
Formular C1
Formular   C1Formular   C1
Formular C1
 
Turbine eoliene ilie tradus
Turbine eoliene ilie tradusTurbine eoliene ilie tradus
Turbine eoliene ilie tradus
 
Razele x tradus
Razele x tradusRazele x tradus
Razele x tradus
 
Radiatii nucleare-padureanu tradus
Radiatii nucleare-padureanu  tradusRadiatii nucleare-padureanu  tradus
Radiatii nucleare-padureanu tradus
 
Panouri solare tradus
Panouri solare tradusPanouri solare tradus
Panouri solare tradus
 
Dozimetrul(1)
Dozimetrul(1)Dozimetrul(1)
Dozimetrul(1)
 
Dozimetrul en
Dozimetrul enDozimetrul en
Dozimetrul en
 

Raport en

  • 1. JOB MATCHING REPORT PSYCHOLOGIST Personal details Name and surname: Date of birth: Sex : female Training : highschool Occupational status: student Address : County : Dolj Telephone number : Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM
  • 2. CANDIDATE PROFILE Ability requirements Percentage of ability requirements match: 65, 63 % General learning ability Description: The ability to assimilate new information, regroup them and operate with them in order to solve problems. It includes focusing one’s attention and resisting interference; ability to organize the information in one’s memory, cognitive inhibition and short-term memory; there is also an operational component, consisting of: analytical judgment, analogical transfer, work memory and flexible categorizing abilities. Required level: 5 (very high learning abilities) Acquired level: 4 (high learning abilities) Results of the tests used to assess dimension: The general learning ability th Test: Analytical judgment (date of test: 10 of October 2012) Test description: This test is used to measure the ability to discover new rules and use them in order to solve reasoning problems. Raw score: 15 Acquired level: 4 (good) th Test: Analogical transfer (date of test: 10 of October 2012) Test description: This test measures the ability to determine the connections between various pairs of verbal or figural elements and to apply them to other pairs. Raw score: 26 Acquired level: 3 (medium) Test: Work memory (the test has not been submitted) Test description: This test measures the ability to carry out several tasks at the same time. Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM 1
  • 3. CANDIDATE PROFILE Test: Cognitive inhibition (the test has not been submitted) Test description: This test measures the ability to focus. Verbal ability Description: Understanding the meaning of the words and using them the right way, the ability to combine them starting from certain set rules for combining words to make up sentences and for combining sentences to make up phrases, the ability to read and understand verbal or written information. Required level: 4 (good verbal ability) Acquired level: 3 (medium verbal ability) Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Verbal ability th Test: Vocabulary (date of test: 10 of October 2012) Test description: This test measures vocabulary-related knowledge. Raw score: 11 Acquired level: 3 (medium) Numerical ability Description: The ability to understand and use numerical contents, the speed and correctness in doing basic mathematical calculations. The ability to analyze a problem and use the appropriate method to solve it. Required level: 3 (medium-high numerical ability) Acquired level: 4 (high numerical ability) Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Numerical ability Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM 2
  • 4. CANDIDATE PROFILE th Test: Mathematical reasoning (date of test: 10 of October 2012) Test description: This test measures the ability to perform mathematical reasoning. Raw score: 8 Acquired level: 3 (medium) Spatial ability Description: The ability to generate, remember and manage abstract visual images, the ability to manipulate and organize spatial information. Required level: 2 (low spatial ability) Acquired level: 3 (medium spatial ability) Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Spatial ability th Test: Spatial orientation (date of test: 10 of October 2012) Test description: This test measures the ability to get spatially oriented. Raw score: 13 Acquired level: 4 (good) Form perception ability Description: The ability to acquire and organize visual information: discriminating a background object, identifying the spatial position of objects (stimuli), the ability to detect form constants and to perceive details. Required level: 2 (low form perception ability) Acquired level: 2 (low form perception ability) Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM 3
  • 5. CANDIDATE PROFILE Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Form perception ability th Test: Complex perceptual analysis (date of test: 10 of October 2012) Test description: This test measures the ability to detect objects in complex graphical contexts. Raw score: 6 Acquired level: 3 (medium) Clerical abilities Description: The ability to identify significant details and mistakes in written materials and tables. Required level: 3 (medium clerical abilities) Acquired level: 3 (medium clerical abilities) Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Clerical abilities th Test: Clerical abilities (date of test: 11 of October 2012) Test description: This test measures the ability to identify significant details and mistakes in written materials and tables. Raw score: 10 Acquired level: 3 (medium) Motor coordination Description: The ability to have a quick reaction (with one’s hand, finger or leg) to a nerve stimulus (light, sound, image), when the latter occurs. It indicates both motor coordination and processing speed. Required level: 4 (high motor coordination) Acquired level: 3 (medium motor coodination) Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM 4
  • 6. CANDIDATE PROFILE Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Motor coordination th Test: Simple reaction test (date of test: 11 of October 2012) Test description: This test measures the ability to have a quick reaction to the occurrence of a visual stimulus. Raw score: 283 Acquired level: 3 (medium) Decision-making ability Description: The rationality of the deciding person, their ability to choose the most reasonable option out of a set of available options. Required level: 4 (high decision-making ability) Acquired level: 3 (medium decision-making ability) Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Decision-making ability th Test: Decision-making ability (date of test: 11 of October 2012) Test description: This test measures the ability to make decisions. Raw score: 4 Acquired level: 3 (medium) Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM 5
  • 7. CANDIDATE PROFILE Personality requirements Percentage of personality requirements match: 0,00 % Extraversion Description: High psychological penchant towards things outside one’s own entity, focus on the social and physical environment (objects, people). Intense desire to act over the environment, action-orientation, communication ease, sociability, permanent need to experiment. Required level: 2 (extraversion level over the population average) Acquired level: cannot be calculated Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Extraversion Test: the CP5F personality questionnaire (test not submitted) Test description: This questionnaire assesses the over factors of the Big Five model: Extraversion (E), Amiability (A), Diligence (D), Emotional stability (S) and Autonomy (A). Amiability Description: The ability to behave. Good will, amiable attitude, politeness, grace. Required level: 3 (amiability level over the population average) Acquired level: cannot be calculated Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Amiability Test: The CP5F personality test (test not submitted) Test description: This questionnaire assesses the over factors of the Big Five model: Extraversion (E), Amiability (A), Diligence (D), Emotional stability (S) and Autonomy (A). Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM 6
  • 8. CANDIDATE PROFILE Diligence Description: Being diligent; correctness, seriousness, scrupulousness. Purpose-oriented behavior, exigency, meticulousness, rigor in achieving the set tasks by being aware of the applicable rules Required level: 2 (diligence level over the population average) Acquired level: cannot be calculated Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Diligence Test: The CP5F personality test (test not submitted) Test description: This questionnaire assesses the over factors of the Big Five model: Extraversion (E), Amiability (A), Diligence (D), Emotional stability (S) and Autonomy (A). Emotional stability Description: The ability to maintain one’s emotional balance in stressful situations with no extreme manifestations that may be unsuitable for the given situation. Required level: 3 (emotional stability level over the population average) Acquired level: cannot be calculated Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Emotional stability Test: The CP5F personality test (test not submitted) Test description: This questionnaire assesses the over factors of the Big Five model: Extraversion (E), Amiability (A), Diligence (D), Emotional stability (S) and Autonomy (A). Autonomy-independence Description: The ability to judge things and act independently, with no influence from other people, in complete freedom. Required level: 3 (autonomy-independence level over the population average) Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM 7
  • 9. CANDIDATE PROFILE Acquired level: cannot be calculated Results of the tests used to assess dimension: Diligence Test: The CP5F personality test (test not submitted) Test description: This questionnaire assesses the over factors of the Big Five model: Extraversion (E), Amiability (A), Diligence (D), Emotional stability (S) and Autonomy (A). Occupational interests requirements Percentage of occupational interests requirements match: 33,33 % th Test : Interest assessment questionnaire (IAQ) (date of test: 11 of October 2012) Test description: This questionnaire assesses the candidate’s occupational interests (preferences for certain fields of knowledge or types of activities). Results as compared to the questionnaire scales: Social interests Scale description: It involves being oriented towards activities which require interpersonal interaction– teaching preference or problem-solving preference. Raw score: 17 (0 - 20) Acquired level: 85% Conventional interests Scale description: They involve a preference for those activities which involve a systematic, orderly manipulation of data or objects in a well defined and well organized environment. Raw score: 14 (0 - 20) Acquired level: 70% Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM 8
  • 10. CANDIDATE PROFILE Entrepreneurship interests Scale description: They consist of a preference for those activities which allow for a sense of initiative and of coordinating one’s own activities or a group’s activities. Raw score: 14 (0 - 20) Acquired level: 70% Artistic interests Scale description: They take the form of an attraction towards less structured activities, which involve a creative solution and allows for self-expression. Raw score: 9 (0 - 20) Acquired level: 45% Investigative interests Scale description: They involve an attraction towards research and investigation, they can take various forms and occur in various fields. Raw score: 5 (0 - 20) Acquired level: 25% Realistic interests Scale description: They consist of a tendency to focus on those activities which involve the use of objects, hands and tools. Raw score: 4 (0 - 20) Acquired level: 20% Summary of the results of assessing occupational interests: Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM 9
  • 11. CANDIDATE PROFILE A PSYCHOLOGIST’s job is a(n) (relevant interests): Investigative job Description: Investigative occupations frequently imply working with ideas and require a great deal of thinking. These occupations may include information research and mental problem-solving. They involve research and investigation activities which take various forms and occur in various fields (biology, physics, society, culture etc.). They usually require mathematical and scientific abilities and work is most frequently individual (doctor, chemist, mathematician, biologist, etc). Social job Description: Social occupations often involve working and relating to people and teaching them. They often require helping and providing support to others. They require interpersonal interaction (teacher, counselor, therapist, etc). Entrepreneur’s job Description: Such occupations frequently imply initiating and completing projects, leading people and making decisions. Sometimes they involve taking chances and are often business-related. They require team work, coordination and speaking and managing abilities (manager, sales agent, etc). A PSYCHOLOGIST’s job is a (n) (less relevant interests): Realistic job Description: Realistic occupations often involve practical problems and solutions, handling objects and instruments. They require physical, mechanical or technical abilities and they most frequently occur in those professional environments which require an optimal level of these abilities (driver, pilot, operator, farmer, etc). Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM 10
  • 12. CANDIDATE PROFILE Artistic job Description: They involve working with shapes, sketches and plans (models). They often require self expression and work can often be performed without complying with any sets of strict rules. They are less structured jobs; they imply a creative solution to problems and allow for self expression (musician, sculptor, writer, etc). Conventional job Description: Conventional occupations often imply routines and following a set of procedures. They can include working with details more than working with ideas. In these occupations the coordinating authority is very clearly set. They are characterized by administrative activities, involving the systematic and orderly manipulation of objects in a well organized and well defined environment (secretary, librarian, clerk, etc). Examiner, BALAN GEORGETA Copyright © 2009 COGNITROM 11