This document discusses challenges in valuing trees and renewable energy assets. It provides an overview of several methods for valuing trees, including CAVAT, Helliwell, and CTLA. These methods use factors like tree size and condition to determine a value. The document also discusses challenges in valuing renewable energy installations using methods like investment, profits, and discounted cash flow. New requirements are emerging for valuing ecosystem services, which presents challenges for valuation professionals.
Ebullient Investments Limited specializes in Building contractor
Ā
Rural Jigsaw: conventional and unconventional valuations of amenity trees, renewable energy and new challenges for land agents
1. A Rural Jigsaw:
Traditional and new
challenges to valuation
and estate management:
trees, energy and
ecosystem services
Charles Cowap
Llandrindod Wells
4 December 2012
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
2. Valuation of trees for
amenity and related
non-timber uses
ā¢ RICS Guidance Note
ā¢ Part of the Red Book suite
ā¢ Guidance on the valuation of:
ā Trees
ā Groups of trees
ā As part of property
ā As separate asset
ā¢ Scope: UK
ā¢ Interest: worldwide!
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
3. The Red Book
ā¢ RICS Valuation Standards
ā¢ Suite of:
ā Practice Statements
ā Guidance Notes
ā Information Papers
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
4. Why?
ā¢ The need to value trees
for various
requirements
ā¢ Emergence of various
methods
ā¢ Need for guidance on
their relationship to Red
Book concepts like
Market Value
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
5. How?
Valuation Basics:
ā¢ Methods
ā¢ Skills and knowledge
ā¢ Terms of engagement
ā¢ Specific information which
may be needed
ā¢ Valuation Basis
ā Market Value
ā Worth
ā Fair Value
ā Existing Use Value
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
6. How?
The Facts
ā¢ Site and legal interest
ā¢ Statutory designation and
other forms of protection
ā¢ Current and proposed site
uses
ā¢ Health and condition, signs of
stress
ā¢ Liability issues
ā¢ Assumptions and special
assumptions
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
10. CAVAT
Capital Asset Value for Amenity
Trees
ā¢ Basic value: unit value x size
ā¢ Community Tree Index Value: population, use,
accessibility
ā¢ Functional value
ā¢ Adjusted value/amenity factors (+/-)
ā¢ Full value/safe life expectancy
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS10
FAAV
11. How CAVAT (probably) worked:
Tree Diameter of 184 cm x Unit Value Factor of Ā£13.18 Ā£350,285
Community Tree Index Factor based on pop density of 2
84.4/ha and relative accessibility of 200% x 100%
Functionality based on crown size and condition of 1
100%
Amenity and appropriateness based on 1.4
Townscape and visual importance + 10%
Local Designation + 10%
Veteran status + 30% (but total limit of +40%)
Safe useful life expectancy of 20 to 40 years: 80% .8
Total Tree Value Ā£750,000
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS11
FAAV
13. Helliwell
Unit value per individual tree, 1.6.08 Ā£25
Size of crown, 200 sq m: score 8 (max) 8
Safe useful life expectancy, 40 ā 100 yrs, (max score 4) 3
Importance in landscape: score 4 (max) 4
Presence of other trees: some (max score 2) 2
Suitability to setting: score 4 (max) 4
Form (thick stem): score 2 (max) 2
Total tree value (compared to a maximum Helliwell value Ā£38,400
of Ā£57,600)
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS13
FAAV
14. 3. Guide for Plant
Appraisal
CTLA
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
15. CTLA is not a method, but a body
Publishing guidance on both Replacement Cost Methodsā¦
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
16. ā¦and Cost of Cure methods
Value may be optimised without full replacement (cf Macklin)
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
18. Species
X
Condition
X Location
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS18
FAAV
19. CTLA
Installed cost for 184 cm diameter tree @ Ā£12.55/sq Ā£333,541
cm (unit rate)
Environmental adaptability: v suitable @ 100% 1.0
Growth characteristics: an average of scores for size, 1.0
longevity and maintenance: 100, 50 and 70%
respectively
Pest and disease susceptibility 0.9 0.96
Condition (90%) and Age / Asset Life (70%) 0.6
Location, based on site rating (100%) x frequency 0.4
(65%) x dominance (65%) x placement (100%)
Value Ā£75,000
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS19
FAAV
20. One Tree
ā¢ 3 Values?
ā¢ Ā£38,400
ā¢ Ā£75,000
ā¢ Ā£750,000
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS20
FAAV
21. ā¢ Helliwell: Visual Amenity Valuation
ā¢ CAVAT: Management of trees as public assets
rather than liabilities, value directly related to
public benefits
ā¢ CTLA: Depreciated Replacement Cost: asset
valuation ā amenity value
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS21
FAAV
22. COMPARISON
ā¢ A standard unit is weighted (multiplied) for various factors
ā¢ Nil value is possible
ā¢ Negative value is impossible without further deductions
ā¢ All are intrinsically capped
ā¢ Scope for substantially different figures
ā¢ No, or little, explicit recognition of land value itself
ā See Lindsay and Lindsay
ā¢ No Basis of Valuation in terms easily reconciled with Red
Book
ā¢ DRC approaches
ā Do the assumptions really work with trees?
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
23. APPLICATION?
ā¢ Assessment of Worth (investment value)
ā¢ Compensation claims
ā Damages
ā Compensation on compulsory purchase
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
24. FORMING A VIEW
ā¢ The need to āstand backā and judge āreasonablenessā
ā¢ Bryant and Macklin (2005)
ā Cost of replacement (DRC): Ā£190,000
ā Diminution of freehold value: Ā£25,000
ā Cost of replacement with young whips: Ā£44,500
ā¢ With regard to:
ā Likely behaviour of property owner
ā Overall context of property market value
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
25. Renewable Energy
Valuation
ā¢ RICS Information Paper
ā¢ Part of the Red Book suite
ā¢ Guidance on the valuation of
Renewable Energy
Installations:
ā Wholesale
ā Own Use
ā Domestic
ā Electricity
ā Heat
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
26. Scope
ā¢ Landlordās Interest
ā¢ Owner-operatorās interest
ā¢ Separately identified asset
ā¢ As part of a larger asset, eg
rural estate or farm
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
28. Investment Method
ā¢ Assessment of Rent Levels
ā¢ Reversionary Aspects
ā¢ Layered Rents
ā¢ Choice of All Risk Yield(s?)
ā¢ Choice of capitalisation
period
ā¢ A role for sensitivity analysis?
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
29. Layered Rents
Layered Rent
Different Risk
Rates?
What happens
here?
Reversion
Term
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
30. Profits Method
ā¢ Identify a separate rental
income stream for separate
capitalisation?
ā¢ Armsā length?
ā¢ Veracity of estimated or
stated profits
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
31. Depreciated
Replacement Cost
ā¢ Extreme caution!!
ā¢ Depreciation rates?
ā¢ Relationship to market or
other basis of value?
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
32. Residual Method
ā¢ All the previous problems ā¦
ā¢ Plus Developerās Profit
ā¢ Uncertainties over planning,
grid connections etc
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
33. DCF Methods
ā¢ In practice widely undertaken
for larger developments
ā¢ Market Value??
ā¢ Appraisal of worth to investor
ā¢ Would the market make
same assumptions?
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
34. BACK TO BASICS
ā¢ Purpose of Valuation
ā¢ Scope of investigations to be undertaken
ā¢ Assumptions and Special Assumptions
ā¢ Preliminary Information
ā¢ Capacity and assumed duration
ā¢ After uses, continuation, redevelopment
ā¢ Reporting Requirements
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
35. Clients Purposes Valuation Methodology
(in no particular order)
Site owners Loan finance Discounted cash flow
Site developers Sale and purchase Investment
Site occupiers Option agreements Profits
Finance providers Development appraisals Comparable
Statutory Asset distribution, e.g. probate, estate Residual
reorganisation, succession, divorce, administration
Depreciated
and winding-up procedures
replacement cost
Taxation, e.g. inheritance tax, capital gains tax,
rating
Business reorganisation
Financial statements
Compensation for compulsory purchase
Compensation to other interests, e.g. tenants, etc.
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
36. REPORTING
ā¢ Rationale for chosen method(s)
ā¢ Detailed consideration of instructions,
assumptions, sources and reliability, extent of
independent verification
ā¢ Sensitivity
ā¢ Commentary on Risk?
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
37. Some Common Issues
ā¢ Development Proposals for
new Sites
ā¢ Hope Value
ā¢ Operator Risk
ā¢ Complex lease or agreement
terms
ā¢ Performance data
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
38. Some Common Issues
ā¢ Reporting Requirements
ā¢ Detailed instructions
ā¢ Market evidence
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
39. Investment Example
10 ha site for 7 wind turbines on 28 year lease, 3 years expired
Turbines: 7 x 2.3 MW x 27% capacity. Output (Elec + ROC) =
Ā£83/MWh
Basic Rent: Ā£7,000 + RPI for 14 years; Ā£12,000 + RPI thereafter
Turnover Rent: 5% of gross income for 14 years; 9% thereafter
Lease is taken from a larger site , rough grazing, of 100 ha in total
Let to a large well established generator
See Estates Gazette 18 August 2012
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
40. BASIC RENT
Term: 11 years remaining
Rent 7,000
YP for 11 yrs @ 8% 7.139 49,973
Reversion:
Rent 12,000
YP for 14 yrs @ 10% 7.367
PV Ā£1 in 11 yrs @ 10% 0.351 31,030
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
41. TURNOVER RENT
Turbines 7
Installed capacity 2.3
Capacity Factor 0.27
Ā£/MWh 83
Gross Income 3,160,617
Term: Turnover 11 yrs remaining
Rent @ 5% of turnover 158,031
YP for 11 yrs @ 10% 6.495 1,026,410
Reversion
Rent @ 9% of turnover 284,456
YP for 14 yrs @ 13% 6.303
PV Ā£1 in 11 yrs @ 13% 0.261 467,953
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
42. REVERSION TO FARMLAND
10 ha @ Ā£2,000 20,000
PV of Ā£1 in 25 yrs @ 3% 0.478 9,560
Ā£1,584,926
REMAINDER OF SITE, FH VP
90 ha @ Ā£2,000 Ā£180,000
GRAND TOTAL Ā£1,764,926
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
43. SUMMARY
Base Rent
Term 49,973 3%
Reversion 31,030 2%
81,003 5%
Turnover Rent
Term 1,026,410 65%
Reversion 467,953 30%
1,494,363 94%
Reversion to Ag Use 9,560 1%
Total 1,584,926 100%
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
44. WIDER VALUATION ISSUES .....
ā¢ Worth and Value in Use v Market Value and Value in Exchange v
Fair Value
ā¢ Valuation and other appraisal methods
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
45. Find out more ā¦..
www.rics.org
Rural e-news
Farmland Market, Autumn 2011
edn.
Estates Gazette
18 August 2012
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
49. Wimbleball Resr &
Context: Exmoor example R Haddeo
R Exe
Exmoor
R Barle
Replenishment
Exebridge Pumping
Pumping Approx 5 miles,
Station lifting water from
120 to 240 m
CO 2 AOD
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
50. Top 10 Business Opportunities
1= Biodiversity Offsetting (BDO) and
Conservation Banking
ā¢ Estimated size of market Ā£50 ā 300 million
pa from housing, plus other sectors
ā¢ Brokerage, certification and registration
ā¢ Additional costs to builders/developers
deducted from land value
1= Peatland Carbon Code and Carbon Credits
ā¢ Peat restoration for carbon storage
ā¢ Management schemes and incentives
ā¢ Certification and brokerage
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
51. 2. Woodfuel and Woodburning Stoves
3. UK ecosystem knowledge economy
4. Layered PES
ā Different Environmental Services
to different buyers
ā Eg ļ
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
52. 6. Carbon sequestration
7. Sustainability certification
ā Opportunities for
intermediaries
8. Sustainable tourism
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
53. 9= Global centre of excellence in
ESS certification
9= Water re-use technology
11 Reducing insurance risk
through green infrastructure
12 Environmental bonds
http://www.valuing-nature.net/opportunities-uk-business-
protect-and-value-natures-services-report-published-
today [accessed 19 July 2012]
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
71. Key Questions for RICS
ā¢ Is this anything to do with us?
ā¢ Our Public Interest Function
in this area?
ā¢ Our Member Services
Function in this area?
ā¢ Our Global Positioning?
ā¢ What, if anything, needs to be
done?
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
72. Thinkpiece
ā¢ Royal Charter
ā Promote the usefulness
of the profession to public
advantage
ā¢ New opportunities in land
management
ā¢ New ways of working in
development
ā¢ New points to reflect in
conventional valuations
ā¢ New types of valuation
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
73. And we should offer:
ā¢ Our expertise
ā¢ In Land Tenure and its
relationship to land
management and
development
ā¢ Our experience of valuation in
challenging commercial
markets
ā¢ Our expertise in brokerage
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
74. Keeping up with latest RICS Developments
Renewables
Valuations
Community
Farm Infrastructure
Business Levy
Tenancies
Charles Cowap
MBA MRICS FAAV
Introduce concept of RICS Guidance Note and stress relationship to Red BookCoverage of valuation of trees and groups of trees.Although the scope of the published guidance is the UK, it has attracted interest from abroad, notably USA.
Reminder of what the Red Book is
RICS has prepared new guidance note because trees have to be considered in relation to property value in a variety of situations.Against this background, various methods have emerged in recent years.But the relationship between these methods and long-established principles and methods of property valuation is far from clear. The Guidance Note therefore seeks to bridge this gap.
Guidance note addresses some basic points that apply to all property valuations, as listed.In particular, the need to establish the purpose and BASIS of valuation.Also note the comments in the guidance on skills and knowledge. Red Book PS 1.5 requires valuer to have the necessary skills and knowledge.These would cover knowledge of tree spp, habitat preferences, growth characteristics, timber characteristics, longevity, structural integrity, landscape character, industry standard methods of measurement.Terms of engagement will also have to be considered carefully where trees are a significant component for consideration in the valuation, including for example: identify the trees concerned, purpose of valuation, information to be made available to the valuer, specific research which the valuer may need to undertake, assumptions and special assumptions which might be applicable ā see PS 2.1 and 2.2 for special assumptions.Reminder of the need to agree acceptable basis of valuation.
Three methods have come into prominence in UK recently.Will be explained by reference to a particular tree valuation which had caught the headlines at the start of this project.
CAVAT was the method used to arrive at the high valuation reported for the Berkeley Square plane tree.It has been developed by members of the London Tree Officers Association and its main focus has been on asset management considerations and in particular claims which arise against local authorities when trees are blamed for subsidence in nearby buildings. There is some evidence from practice that CAVAT is being accepted by insurers as the basis for settlements in such cases.
This is how a CAVAT valuation is built up. The following example should make it clearer.
Published guidance from CAVAT shows how these factors are built up.The Berkeley Square plane tree is large, so its initial value is large. Essentially, this is a replacement cost, factored for the size of the existing tree.Community Tree Index reflects population density and accessibility ā both factors are high for this central London site.Functionality is based on crown size and condition, both good in this case.Various āadd onsā follow for amenity value. Although the total available for each of the three points is 50%, the maximum add on allowed is 40%.As an older tree, the Plane has a limited life expectancy and this has reduced the value slightly, to 80%.Hence the total valuation of Ā£750,000.CAVAT has been criticised for not adequately reflecting depreciation.
Helliwell method was one of first to be used in UK.
Taking the same tree, Helliwell would look like this.Again it starts with a unit value per individual tree and adjustments are made.The adjustments are all on a fixed scale. In this case, the maximum of the scale has been used for each factor except life expectancy ā 3 rather than 4.The maximum Helliwell valuation would therefore be Ā£57,600, but in this case is Ā£38,400.Much lower than CAVAT ā but are they valuing the same thing in our terms?
3rd and final method: CTLA an American based organisation which leads the publication of plant appraisal methodologies. The US Guidance has recently been adapted/developed for use in UK conditions.
CTLA publishes guidance on a range of methods, but Replacement Cost Methods are the ones which have crossed the Atlantic.
CTLA also considers a number of other approaches, eg cost of cure, or remedy.
Adam Hollis has prepared guidance notes on the use of DRC for amenity tree valuation, adapting the US guidance to UK conditions.
The basic approach is Species x Condition x Location
The DRC approach to the Plane Tree would have looked like this.Adjustments are then made for environmental suitability, growth characteristics and pest and disease susceptibility.Further adjustements are made for condition and age, site, frequency, dominance and placement.Total: Ā£75,000 ā again quite different from the previous valuations!
This shows the different emphases of the methods. CAVAT specifically excludes any measure of exteranl liability associated with a tree, which would need to be a āspecial assumptionā in Red Book terms.
Standard unit is a cost for two of the methods and a simple unit for the other (Helliwell).Lindsay v Lindsay: LT case. Claim included separate items for land value and the trees upon it (Helliwell). LT considered that the figures used for the land value already reflected the present of trees and rejected the separate claim for their value. Underlines the importance of correct identification and categorisation of assets under consideration, and importance of handling and analysing transactional evidence.
Leads to question of circumstances in which these methods might be worth considering.Assessment of Worth is basically worth to the individual client and, provided the client understands the basis on which the valuation has been prepared, one or other of these methods may be helpful.The methods have also been used in compensation claims, both general and on CP&C, successfully despite Lindsay v Lindsay.
Bryant and Macklin: CA case.Wilful destruction of trees by neighbour.Reasonableness:āThe judge must stand back, when he has done his arithmetic, and ask himself whether the figure achieved by his findings is fair both to the plaintiff and to the defendantsā (Chadwick LJ quoting Russell LJ in Farmer Giles Ltd v Wessex Water Authority and another.Ā£44,500 awarded. Per Chadwick LJāThat represents less than ten percent of the value of the property in question. In my view it is impossible to say that a reasonable person with ample funds at his disposal would not think it reasonable to lay out that sum in restoring an amenity to his home; provided, of course, that the expenditure would lead to a benefit worth having. Mr Gilbert thought it would; and the judge made no finding that it would not. It is important to keep in mind that Mr and Mrs Bryant want to continue living in their property. They do not want to sell up and move on. I find it difficult to accept that they would not think that the prospect of restoring trees to their boundaries ā even if that would take some time ā was not a benefit worth having. The alternative ā to do nothing ā would, I think, be rightly rejected as unacceptable.ā Emphasising the need to stand back, have regard to the value of trees in the context of the property as a whole and with regard to the likely actions and motivations of real owners.