I’m Claire Major, and may talk today is about learning theories and online learning.
Central to this talk is the following question: What is learning?
Many scholars agree that learning is a process
They also agree that the result of the process of learning leads to some kind of change
The underlying question then is this:What kind of change does learning cause?
The answer depends upon whom you ask.
There are many different theories of learning, that attempt to describe what learning is, how it happens, and what change results.
Some of these theories describe learning as a change that happens within an individual’s mind.
These theories tend to come from the field of psychology, and there are three main psychological theories of learning…..
Behaviorism is the earliest of these theories
Famous behaviorists include
Skinner and Pavlov, with their ideas about classical conditioning.
Think about Skinner’s rats…
And Pavlov’s dog.
Thorndike is another famous behaviorists, with his notion of operant conditioning.
Think Thorndike’s cat in the puzzle box
Bandura is sometimes thought of as a bahaviorist, although he represents a bridge to cognitivist learning theory….
Particiularly with his conception of personal determinants, which include an individuals knowledge, prior experiences, and attitudes.
According to behavorists…
Acquiring knowledge through experience is the goal of learning is the goal of learning.
Stimulus and response is the mechanism for learning
Rewards and punishmentsare factors that influence learning.
Cognitivism is another pscyhological theory of learning
Cognitivists hold that learning is a relatively permanent change in a learner’s schemata or in the way the brain processes.
Famous cognitivists include
Wrtheimer, with his notion of Gestalt psychology
Which holds that the brian is holistic, with self organizing principles, such as multistabliity in which ambiguous images pop back and forth in our perception.
Atkinson and Shiffrin and their ideas about information processing
Which suggest that the mind works like a computer, as information is temporarily held in short term memory before moving to long term memory.
And Anderson, with his notion of schema theory is another famous cognitivist.
Which canbe described as a mental structure or a system for organizing and perceiving new information.
Cognitivists believe that
Changing mental processes (e.g. problem-solving) is the goal of learning.
Duplication of knowledge constructs of knower who organizes information for the learner is how learning occurs.
Existing schemata and prior experiences are factors that influence learning.
The thirdpschological theory of learning is constructivism.
Constructivists believe that learning is a process in which the learner constructs or builds new ideas or concepts based upon current and past knowledge.
Learning is a personal endeavor, whereby internalized concepts, rules, and general principles may consequently be applied in a practical real-world context.
Famous constructovists include
Piaget, with his notion of congnitive constructivism
Who says that knowing reality means constructing systems of transofrmations that correspond, more or less adequately, to reality
Vygotsky, with his notion of social constructivism
Wy says that through others, we become ourselves
Pappert who extended Vygotsky’s notion to a new form, which he called social constructionism.
Papert says that the role of the teacher is to create conditions for invention rathern than provide ready-made knowledge.
Constructivists believe that
Constructing new knowledge (e.g. a new internal reality) is the goal of learning.
Experience of an individual acting and engaging with others is how learning occurs.
Prior experiences are the key factors that influence learning.
These theories are interesting, and they have good evidence to support their efficacy.
Are starting to think about learning a bit differently…this shift is in part enabled because of technology
Thus a new camp of learning theories and theorists has developed…
Are coming from a range of fields, including sociology, anthropology, philosophy, education
These are at times called social learning theories, at times called realtional learning theories, and occasionally called contextual learning theoreis.
They set forth a view of learning that holds that all learning is a change in connections to other people and tools.
Learning, then, does not belong to an individual but to many, evidenced through the conversations amongst individuals.
Hutchings and Perry and their ideas about distributed learning theory
Which suggest that learning exists outside of the mind and resides with people and tools
Lave and Wenger and Seely brown and their ideas about situated learning theory
Which suggests that learning is contextually bound.
And Siemens and Downs and tehir notion of Connectivism
Which isuggests that learning is represented in nodes and ties between indivdiuals and artifacts.
According to social relational theorists:
A group of individuals building a networked intelligence is a goal of learning.
Resources are shared within a community, in which members interact with each other and with technological tools is the way in which learning happens.
Is a factor that Influences learning.
We can create online courses from an individualists perspective, developing them to support behaviorial, cognitive or social constructivist perspectives.
online learning can also support a social relational view of learning
In an online course, knowledge resides amongst individuals and their technological objects and tools
In online courses, students interact with each other and with technology.
Online, students engage in joint activity and have shared tools.
Their interactions with technology are by nature social ones.
Students use their objects and tools and they think and learn with them
They construct a common language and shared understanding while they are simultaneously engaged in the pursuit of individual and collective objectives.
STudents learn as they construct a network of both human and non-human actors, including technical tools.
Thus they are active agents in a socio-cultural and socio-technological environment.
Why is any of this important?
Because our beliefs about learning drive our pedagogical decisions and ultimately our teaching acts…
Whether they do so on a conscious or subconscious level.
We should ask ourselves the following questions:
Who am I theoretically speaking? What is my stance on learning?Am IA behavorists?A cognitivistA constructivist?
Can reside outside the mind of an individual?
Technological tools and artifacts in the process of learning?
Being aware of our stances toward learning can help us make better, more informed decisions.
Being more aware of what we see as the goal and process of learning can help us to create better learning environments and activities.
Being aware of and owning our stances can help us help students learn.
That is, after all, the point.
I plan to use an extended version of this information in a book that I’m currently writing…
Please comment if you have suggestions for improving this content!
The permalink to this presentation is at clairemajor.net