SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 31
Baixar para ler offline
BENCHMARKING TO DRIVE
        ADVANCEMENT STRATEGIES:
        L E A R N I N G F R O M N AT I O N A L G I V I N G T R E N D S


        Brian Kish
        Senior Vice President for Central Development,
        University of Arizona Foundation
              &
        Annual Giving Consultant,
        Campbell and Company




08/10/2011    Footer                                     1
BENEFITS OF BENCHMARKING
       Benchmarking helps institutions:
       • Identify strengths and weaknesses
       • Consider new methods, ideas and tools to improve effectiveness
       • Crack through resistance to change
       • Set higher standards
       • Accelerate learning
       • Make better decisions
       • Improve allocation of scarce resources
       • Justify fundraising investments
       • Demonstrate efficiency to stakeholders/donors
       • Preserve institutional memory through staff transitions
                      Raise more money for your school!




08/10/2011   Footer                      2
HIGHER EDUCATION INDEX METHODOLOGY
       •     Index is published annually – reviews past three fiscal years
       •     36 public and 35 private institutions
       •     Actual donor transactions, not survey responses
       •     Cash payment basis, not pledges
       •     Does not include:
             - Soft credits
             - Matching gift payments




08/10/2011      Footer                         3
MEDIAN CHANGE IN REVENUE


                                     2008          2009            2010




             6.9%
                              4.9%                          4.9%          4.9%             4.9%
                                            3.0%




                                                   -12.7%
                    -14.8%                                                       -14.4%


                    Private                        Public                        Overall




08/10/2011      Footer                             4
MEDIAN REVENUE PER DONOR


                                      2008          2009        2010




             $723
                               $687

                        $610
                                                                       $512
                                                                                        $479
                                                                               $450
                                             $384             $385
                                                      $348




                    Private                          Public                   Overall



08/10/2011     Footer                                5
MEDIAN CHANGE IN DONOR COUNTS



                                      2008            2009            2010




                               0.1%

                                                                                               -0.8%
             -1.9%                                            -2.3%          -2.5%
                                             -2.6%
                     -4.1%                                                           -4.6%
                                                     -7.1%

                     Private                         Public                          Overall



08/10/2011     Footer                                6
ACQUISITION




08/10/2011   Footer   7
MEDIAN CHANGE IN NEW DONORS


                                     2008       2009           2010


                              2.9%
             2.0%



                    -0.4%
                                                                                        -1.9%

                                                                      -4.1%
                                                             -4.7%

                                            -6.6%
                                                                              -7.7%



                                                    -12.1%

                    Private                         Public                    Overall




08/10/2011     Footer                                8
MEDIAN NEW DONOR RETENTION RATE



                                   2008     2009         2010




             30%             30%          27%
                    30%                                         27%             27%
                                                24%      25%           25%




                   Private                      Public                Overall




08/10/2011     Footer                           9
RETENTION




08/10/2011   Footer   10
MEDIAN DONOR RETENTION RATES


                                    2008         2009        2010




             68%
                        67%   67%                                   63%
                                           58%              58%            62%      62%
                                                   56%




                   Private                         Public                 Overall


08/10/2011     Footer                              11
MEDIAN CHANGE IN RETAINED DONOR REVENUE

                                     2008          2009        2010




             8.5%
                                                                      6.1%
                              4.5%          3.8%
                                                             2.6%                      3.2%




                                                    -12.5%                   -13.0%
                    -14.8%

                    Private                        Public                    Overall


08/10/2011     Footer                              12
MEDIAN MULTI-YEAR DONOR RETENTION RATES


                                    2008              2009         2010




             71%              71%
                        70%                                               67%             67%
                                           63%               63%                 65%
                                                  60%




                   Private                       Public                         Overall


08/10/2011     Footer                            13
R E A C T I VAT I O N




08/10/2011   Footer            14
MEDIAN DONOR REACTIVATION RATES



                                    2008         2009             2010




             20%
                              18%                                        17%
                        18%                16%                                 16%       16%
                                                      14%   14%




                   Private                       Public                        Overall



08/10/2011     Footer                            15
MEDIAN CHANGE IN REACTIVATED DONOR REVENUE



                                       2008      2009          2010



                               21.0%
                                                              16.0%                     17.0%



                                              0.1%


             -4.4%
                                                                      -0.2%
                     -13.5%                          -16.5%                   -15.5%




                     Private                         Public                   Overall



08/10/2011     Footer                                16
INDUSTRY COMPARISON: NATIONAL INDEX




08/10/2011   Footer         17
YOUNG ALUMNI




08/10/2011   Footer   18
CLOSER LOOK – YOUNG ALUMNI
       • Metrics shown are based on data gathered in the following
         donorCentrics benchmarking groups:
             - Big 10/Big 12 Benchmarking group consists of institutions in the Big 10 and
               Big 12 athletic conference (Undergraduate and Graduate Alumni Giving)
             - Private College Consortium consists of private colleges that are reunion-
               focused (Undergraduate Alumni Giving)
             - Business School group consists of top-ranked graduate business schools
             - Law School group consists of top-ranked law schools




08/10/2011      Footer                            19
FY2010 PARTICIPATION RATE – 90’S AND 00’S

       50.0%

       45.0%                            Class of 1990-1999           Class of 2000-2009

       40.0%

       35.0%

       30.0%

       25.0%
                                                                           20.7%
       20.0%                                 18.8%                   18%
                                                     17.0%
       15.0%                                                                              12.3% 12.5%

       10.0%
                        6.3%
        5.0%                   4.1%


        0.0%
                        Big 10/Big 12   Private College Consortium    Business                Law




08/10/2011     Footer                                        20
5 YEAR PARTICIPATION RATE – 90’S AND 00’S
       100%

        90%                                      1990-1999                2000-2009

        80%

        70%

        60%                                              56%
                                                                              52%
        50%
                                                 40%                    39%
        40%

                                                                                      29%   31%
        30%

        20%                18%
                                   13%
        10%

             0%
                           Big 10/Big 12   Private College Consortium    Business       Law




08/10/2011        Footer                                        21
RETENTION RATES – 90’S AND 00’S
       100%

        90%                                      1990-1999                2000-2009

        80%

        70%                                      66%                    65%
                                                                                      59%
        60%
                           54%
                                                                              51%
                                                         48%                                49%
        50%
                                   42%
        40%

        30%

        20%

        10%

             0%
                           Big 10/Big 12   Private College Consortium    Business       Law




08/10/2011        Footer                                        22
ON-LINE GIVING




08/10/2011   Footer     23
INTERNET GIVING – HIGHER EDUCATION FY10

                        % of Gifts via        % of Revenue   Revenue per
                        Online                Online         Online Gift
      Big 10 /Big 12          6%                   6%             $270
      Private College
      Consortium              17%                  11%            $265

      Business                29%                  18%            $290

      Law                     15%                  10%            $430




08/10/2011   Footer                      24
INDUSTRY COMPARISON: ONLINE GIVING FROM
       NATIONAL INDEX




08/10/2011   Footer         25
HIGH-END GIVING




08/10/2011   Footer      26
HIGH END GIVING
       • Data from 12 large public schools, gifts of $1,000-$50,000 in a given
         year
       • On average, it took 13.2 years for a donor to make his/her first
         $1,000+ gift.
       • Those who gave $1,000+ in FY2009, gave about 73% of the years
         that they were on file
       • 57% of them made a first gift less than $100
       • However, the higher the first gift, the quicker they became one of
         these donors.
       • Of those that eventually gave $1,000+, a $100 first time donor did so
         at about a 30% faster rate than a $1-24 dollars donor




08/10/2011   Footer                      27
!




                           !




08/10/2011   Footer   28
GIVING BY LEVEL FOR SMALL PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS

                                                                Donors                    Revenue
                    35%


                    30%


                    25%


                    20%
       % or Total




                    15%


                    10%


                    5%


                    0%
                             $1-24   $25-49   $50-99   $100-   $250-   $500-    $1000-   $1500-   $2500-   $5000- $10000- $25000- $50000+
                                                        249     499     999      1499     2499     4999     9999   24999 49999




08/10/2011                Footer                                           29
GIVING BY LEVEL FOR LARGE PUBLIC


                    30%                                             Donors           Revenue



                    25%



                    20%
       % of Total




                    15%



                    10%



                    5%



                    0%
                            $1-24   $25-49 $50-99   $100-   $250-   $500-    $1000- $1500- $2500- $5000- $10000- $25000- $50000+
                                                     249     499     999      1499   2499   4999   9999   24999 49999




08/10/2011                Footer                                       30
QUESTIONS & COMMENTS




08/10/2011   Footer            31

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Profarma 2Q10
Profarma 2Q10Profarma 2Q10
Profarma 2Q10
Profarma
 
Profarma 3Q10
Profarma 3Q10Profarma 3Q10
Profarma 3Q10
Profarma
 
ApresentaçãO 1 Q07
ApresentaçãO 1 Q07ApresentaçãO 1 Q07
ApresentaçãO 1 Q07
Localiza
 
Profarma apresentação 2 q10 final
Profarma apresentação 2 q10 finalProfarma apresentação 2 q10 final
Profarma apresentação 2 q10 final
Profarma
 
omnicom group Q2 2008 Investor Presentation
omnicom group  Q2 2008 Investor Presentation omnicom group  Q2 2008 Investor Presentation
omnicom group Q2 2008 Investor Presentation
finance22
 
centex UBS /11 /11/08
centex  UBS /11 /11/08centex  UBS /11 /11/08
centex UBS /11 /11/08
finance18
 
Apres call 2_q10_v2
Apres call 2_q10_v2Apres call 2_q10_v2
Apres call 2_q10_v2
Arteris S.A.
 
Apresentação call 1 q12_eng
Apresentação call 1 q12_engApresentação call 1 q12_eng
Apresentação call 1 q12_eng
Arteris S.A.
 
2012 Investment Review (Us)
2012 Investment Review (Us)2012 Investment Review (Us)
2012 Investment Review (Us)
andrewyoungkofc
 
The Uk Civil Society Almanac 2010
The Uk Civil Society Almanac 2010The Uk Civil Society Almanac 2010
The Uk Civil Society Almanac 2010
Karl Wilding
 
atmos enerrgy 120705pres
atmos enerrgy 120705presatmos enerrgy 120705pres
atmos enerrgy 120705pres
finance35
 
terex Jefferies081308
terex Jefferies081308terex Jefferies081308
terex Jefferies081308
finance42
 

Mais procurados (19)

European Leveraged Loan Market Analysis - Year-end 2010
European Leveraged Loan Market Analysis - Year-end 2010European Leveraged Loan Market Analysis - Year-end 2010
European Leveraged Loan Market Analysis - Year-end 2010
 
Profarma 2Q10
Profarma 2Q10Profarma 2Q10
Profarma 2Q10
 
Profarma 3Q10
Profarma 3Q10Profarma 3Q10
Profarma 3Q10
 
3Q08 Earnings Release Presentation
3Q08 Earnings Release Presentation3Q08 Earnings Release Presentation
3Q08 Earnings Release Presentation
 
ApresentaçãO 1 Q07
ApresentaçãO 1 Q07ApresentaçãO 1 Q07
ApresentaçãO 1 Q07
 
Profarma apresentação 2 q10 final
Profarma apresentação 2 q10 finalProfarma apresentação 2 q10 final
Profarma apresentação 2 q10 final
 
Korea fund4q presentation
Korea fund4q presentationKorea fund4q presentation
Korea fund4q presentation
 
2005 Shareholders Meeting
	2005 Shareholders Meeting	2005 Shareholders Meeting
2005 Shareholders Meeting
 
omnicom group Q2 2008 Investor Presentation
omnicom group  Q2 2008 Investor Presentation omnicom group  Q2 2008 Investor Presentation
omnicom group Q2 2008 Investor Presentation
 
Feb 20 2012 - Nestlé 2011 Full-year roadshow presentation
Feb 20 2012 - Nestlé 2011 Full-year roadshow presentationFeb 20 2012 - Nestlé 2011 Full-year roadshow presentation
Feb 20 2012 - Nestlé 2011 Full-year roadshow presentation
 
centex UBS /11 /11/08
centex  UBS /11 /11/08centex  UBS /11 /11/08
centex UBS /11 /11/08
 
Apres call 2_q10_v2
Apres call 2_q10_v2Apres call 2_q10_v2
Apres call 2_q10_v2
 
Apresentação call 1 q12_eng
Apresentação call 1 q12_engApresentação call 1 q12_eng
Apresentação call 1 q12_eng
 
Q2 2011 financial_highlights
Q2 2011 financial_highlightsQ2 2011 financial_highlights
Q2 2011 financial_highlights
 
4Q12 Presentation
4Q12 Presentation4Q12 Presentation
4Q12 Presentation
 
2012 Investment Review (Us)
2012 Investment Review (Us)2012 Investment Review (Us)
2012 Investment Review (Us)
 
The Uk Civil Society Almanac 2010
The Uk Civil Society Almanac 2010The Uk Civil Society Almanac 2010
The Uk Civil Society Almanac 2010
 
atmos enerrgy 120705pres
atmos enerrgy 120705presatmos enerrgy 120705pres
atmos enerrgy 120705pres
 
terex Jefferies081308
terex Jefferies081308terex Jefferies081308
terex Jefferies081308
 

Semelhante a Benchmarking todriveadvancementstrategy

Why you should Invest in Chile?
Why you should Invest in Chile?Why you should Invest in Chile?
Why you should Invest in Chile?
Sebastian Landgren
 
What is the future of instore brand performance consumer behaviour
What is the future of instore brand performance  consumer behaviourWhat is the future of instore brand performance  consumer behaviour
What is the future of instore brand performance consumer behaviour
LindaSidia
 
Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009
Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009
Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009
Erick Caniso
 
The labor market surprises
The labor market surprisesThe labor market surprises
The labor market surprises
Banco Pine
 
Media landscape updater i 2012
Media landscape updater i 2012Media landscape updater i 2012
Media landscape updater i 2012
MediaDirectionOMD
 
4Q 2012 Earnings Presentation
4Q 2012 Earnings Presentation4Q 2012 Earnings Presentation
4Q 2012 Earnings Presentation
irbgcpartners
 
Earnings Release 4Q08 Presentation
Earnings Release 4Q08 PresentationEarnings Release 4Q08 Presentation
Earnings Release 4Q08 Presentation
Profarma
 

Semelhante a Benchmarking todriveadvancementstrategy (20)

2011 CMA Compensation Survey
2011 CMA Compensation Survey2011 CMA Compensation Survey
2011 CMA Compensation Survey
 
India Market Reflections (2008-12)
India Market Reflections (2008-12)India Market Reflections (2008-12)
India Market Reflections (2008-12)
 
Why chile?
Why chile?Why chile?
Why chile?
 
The Economy and Financial Markets: Crawling Out of Recession - David Wyss, Br...
The Economy and Financial Markets: Crawling Out of Recession - David Wyss, Br...The Economy and Financial Markets: Crawling Out of Recession - David Wyss, Br...
The Economy and Financial Markets: Crawling Out of Recession - David Wyss, Br...
 
Why you should Invest in Chile?
Why you should Invest in Chile?Why you should Invest in Chile?
Why you should Invest in Chile?
 
Reward trends - Aon Hewitt
Reward trends - Aon HewittReward trends - Aon Hewitt
Reward trends - Aon Hewitt
 
What is the future of instore brand performance consumer behaviour
What is the future of instore brand performance  consumer behaviourWhat is the future of instore brand performance  consumer behaviour
What is the future of instore brand performance consumer behaviour
 
Think Latin America: Live Positively
Think Latin America: Live PositivelyThink Latin America: Live Positively
Think Latin America: Live Positively
 
Ebi.ferrier.2011 sdep
Ebi.ferrier.2011 sdepEbi.ferrier.2011 sdep
Ebi.ferrier.2011 sdep
 
Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009
Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009
Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009
 
The labor market surprises
The labor market surprisesThe labor market surprises
The labor market surprises
 
Media landscape updater i 2012
Media landscape updater i 2012Media landscape updater i 2012
Media landscape updater i 2012
 
E-Updates_Apr12—Indian & Global Economic Indicators
E-Updates_Apr12—Indian & Global Economic IndicatorsE-Updates_Apr12—Indian & Global Economic Indicators
E-Updates_Apr12—Indian & Global Economic Indicators
 
4Q 2012 Earnings Presentation
4Q 2012 Earnings Presentation4Q 2012 Earnings Presentation
4Q 2012 Earnings Presentation
 
2013 aspe presentation
2013 aspe presentation2013 aspe presentation
2013 aspe presentation
 
Earnings Release 4Q08 Presentation
Earnings Release 4Q08 PresentationEarnings Release 4Q08 Presentation
Earnings Release 4Q08 Presentation
 
Nestle 2008 Q3 earnings results
Nestle 2008 Q3 earnings resultsNestle 2008 Q3 earnings results
Nestle 2008 Q3 earnings results
 
enterpriseSeattle Forecast 2012 - Dick Conway
enterpriseSeattle Forecast 2012 - Dick ConwayenterpriseSeattle Forecast 2012 - Dick Conway
enterpriseSeattle Forecast 2012 - Dick Conway
 
E-mail marketing benchmark_apac_2012
E-mail marketing benchmark_apac_2012E-mail marketing benchmark_apac_2012
E-mail marketing benchmark_apac_2012
 
Apresen
ApresenApresen
Apresen
 

Mais de carolinestallings

Unlv user forum_jennifermercer_theraisersedge
Unlv user forum_jennifermercer_theraisersedgeUnlv user forum_jennifermercer_theraisersedge
Unlv user forum_jennifermercer_theraisersedge
carolinestallings
 
Unlv user forum_annual appeal support
Unlv user forum_annual appeal supportUnlv user forum_annual appeal support
Unlv user forum_annual appeal support
carolinestallings
 
Unlv user forum_hollycondon_goingpaperless
Unlv user forum_hollycondon_goingpaperlessUnlv user forum_hollycondon_goingpaperless
Unlv user forum_hollycondon_goingpaperless
carolinestallings
 
Unlv user forum_briankish_benchmarking
Unlv user forum_briankish_benchmarkingUnlv user forum_briankish_benchmarking
Unlv user forum_briankish_benchmarking
carolinestallings
 
Unlv user forum_innovativewaystofundraise)
Unlv user forum_innovativewaystofundraise)Unlv user forum_innovativewaystofundraise)
Unlv user forum_innovativewaystofundraise)
carolinestallings
 
Engaging interaction part two
Engaging interaction part twoEngaging interaction part two
Engaging interaction part two
carolinestallings
 
Engaging interaction part one
Engaging interaction part oneEngaging interaction part one
Engaging interaction part one
carolinestallings
 
Benchmarking todriveadvancementstrategy sonoma
Benchmarking todriveadvancementstrategy sonomaBenchmarking todriveadvancementstrategy sonoma
Benchmarking todriveadvancementstrategy sonoma
carolinestallings
 

Mais de carolinestallings (10)

Unlv user forum_jennifermercer_theraisersedge
Unlv user forum_jennifermercer_theraisersedgeUnlv user forum_jennifermercer_theraisersedge
Unlv user forum_jennifermercer_theraisersedge
 
Unlv user forum_annual appeal support
Unlv user forum_annual appeal supportUnlv user forum_annual appeal support
Unlv user forum_annual appeal support
 
Unlv user forum_hollycondon_goingpaperless
Unlv user forum_hollycondon_goingpaperlessUnlv user forum_hollycondon_goingpaperless
Unlv user forum_hollycondon_goingpaperless
 
Unlv user forum_briankish_benchmarking
Unlv user forum_briankish_benchmarkingUnlv user forum_briankish_benchmarking
Unlv user forum_briankish_benchmarking
 
Unlv user forum_innovativewaystofundraise)
Unlv user forum_innovativewaystofundraise)Unlv user forum_innovativewaystofundraise)
Unlv user forum_innovativewaystofundraise)
 
Engaging interaction part two
Engaging interaction part twoEngaging interaction part two
Engaging interaction part two
 
Engaging interaction part one
Engaging interaction part oneEngaging interaction part one
Engaging interaction part one
 
Benchmarking todriveadvancementstrategy sonoma
Benchmarking todriveadvancementstrategy sonomaBenchmarking todriveadvancementstrategy sonoma
Benchmarking todriveadvancementstrategy sonoma
 
Import o matic_higher_ed
Import o matic_higher_edImport o matic_higher_ed
Import o matic_higher_ed
 
Tricks and tips_re
Tricks and tips_reTricks and tips_re
Tricks and tips_re
 

Último

Mckinsey foundation level Handbook for Viewing
Mckinsey foundation level Handbook for ViewingMckinsey foundation level Handbook for Viewing
Mckinsey foundation level Handbook for Viewing
Nauman Safdar
 
Al Mizhar Dubai Escorts +971561403006 Escorts Service In Al Mizhar
Al Mizhar Dubai Escorts +971561403006 Escorts Service In Al MizharAl Mizhar Dubai Escorts +971561403006 Escorts Service In Al Mizhar
Al Mizhar Dubai Escorts +971561403006 Escorts Service In Al Mizhar
allensay1
 

Último (20)

Pre Engineered Building Manufacturers Hyderabad.pptx
Pre Engineered  Building Manufacturers Hyderabad.pptxPre Engineered  Building Manufacturers Hyderabad.pptx
Pre Engineered Building Manufacturers Hyderabad.pptx
 
Uneak White's Personal Brand Exploration Presentation
Uneak White's Personal Brand Exploration PresentationUneak White's Personal Brand Exploration Presentation
Uneak White's Personal Brand Exploration Presentation
 
How to Get Started in Social Media for Art League City
How to Get Started in Social Media for Art League CityHow to Get Started in Social Media for Art League City
How to Get Started in Social Media for Art League City
 
Lucknow Housewife Escorts by Sexy Bhabhi Service 8250092165
Lucknow Housewife Escorts  by Sexy Bhabhi Service 8250092165Lucknow Housewife Escorts  by Sexy Bhabhi Service 8250092165
Lucknow Housewife Escorts by Sexy Bhabhi Service 8250092165
 
Chennai Call Gril 80022//12248 Only For Sex And High Profile Best Gril Sex Av...
Chennai Call Gril 80022//12248 Only For Sex And High Profile Best Gril Sex Av...Chennai Call Gril 80022//12248 Only For Sex And High Profile Best Gril Sex Av...
Chennai Call Gril 80022//12248 Only For Sex And High Profile Best Gril Sex Av...
 
Mckinsey foundation level Handbook for Viewing
Mckinsey foundation level Handbook for ViewingMckinsey foundation level Handbook for Viewing
Mckinsey foundation level Handbook for Viewing
 
Cannabis Legalization World Map: 2024 Updated
Cannabis Legalization World Map: 2024 UpdatedCannabis Legalization World Map: 2024 Updated
Cannabis Legalization World Map: 2024 Updated
 
Berhampur 70918*19311 CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Berhampur 70918*19311 CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDINGBerhampur 70918*19311 CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Berhampur 70918*19311 CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
 
Organizational Transformation Lead with Culture
Organizational Transformation Lead with CultureOrganizational Transformation Lead with Culture
Organizational Transformation Lead with Culture
 
QSM Chap 10 Service Culture in Tourism and Hospitality Industry.pptx
QSM Chap 10 Service Culture in Tourism and Hospitality Industry.pptxQSM Chap 10 Service Culture in Tourism and Hospitality Industry.pptx
QSM Chap 10 Service Culture in Tourism and Hospitality Industry.pptx
 
Paradip CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Paradip CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDINGParadip CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Paradip CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
 
Berhampur CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Berhampur CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDINGBerhampur CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Berhampur CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
 
Al Mizhar Dubai Escorts +971561403006 Escorts Service In Al Mizhar
Al Mizhar Dubai Escorts +971561403006 Escorts Service In Al MizharAl Mizhar Dubai Escorts +971561403006 Escorts Service In Al Mizhar
Al Mizhar Dubai Escorts +971561403006 Escorts Service In Al Mizhar
 
Unveiling Falcon Invoice Discounting: Leading the Way as India's Premier Bill...
Unveiling Falcon Invoice Discounting: Leading the Way as India's Premier Bill...Unveiling Falcon Invoice Discounting: Leading the Way as India's Premier Bill...
Unveiling Falcon Invoice Discounting: Leading the Way as India's Premier Bill...
 
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptx
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptxPutting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptx
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptx
 
Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024
Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024
Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024
 
Dr. Admir Softic_ presentation_Green Club_ENG.pdf
Dr. Admir Softic_ presentation_Green Club_ENG.pdfDr. Admir Softic_ presentation_Green Club_ENG.pdf
Dr. Admir Softic_ presentation_Green Club_ENG.pdf
 
UAE Bur Dubai Call Girls ☏ 0564401582 Call Girl in Bur Dubai
UAE Bur Dubai Call Girls ☏ 0564401582 Call Girl in Bur DubaiUAE Bur Dubai Call Girls ☏ 0564401582 Call Girl in Bur Dubai
UAE Bur Dubai Call Girls ☏ 0564401582 Call Girl in Bur Dubai
 
PARK STREET 💋 Call Girl 9827461493 Call Girls in Escort service book now
PARK STREET 💋 Call Girl 9827461493 Call Girls in  Escort service book nowPARK STREET 💋 Call Girl 9827461493 Call Girls in  Escort service book now
PARK STREET 💋 Call Girl 9827461493 Call Girls in Escort service book now
 
Kalyan Call Girl 98350*37198 Call Girls in Escort service book now
Kalyan Call Girl 98350*37198 Call Girls in Escort service book nowKalyan Call Girl 98350*37198 Call Girls in Escort service book now
Kalyan Call Girl 98350*37198 Call Girls in Escort service book now
 

Benchmarking todriveadvancementstrategy

  • 1. BENCHMARKING TO DRIVE ADVANCEMENT STRATEGIES: L E A R N I N G F R O M N AT I O N A L G I V I N G T R E N D S Brian Kish Senior Vice President for Central Development, University of Arizona Foundation & Annual Giving Consultant, Campbell and Company 08/10/2011 Footer 1
  • 2. BENEFITS OF BENCHMARKING Benchmarking helps institutions: • Identify strengths and weaknesses • Consider new methods, ideas and tools to improve effectiveness • Crack through resistance to change • Set higher standards • Accelerate learning • Make better decisions • Improve allocation of scarce resources • Justify fundraising investments • Demonstrate efficiency to stakeholders/donors • Preserve institutional memory through staff transitions Raise more money for your school! 08/10/2011 Footer 2
  • 3. HIGHER EDUCATION INDEX METHODOLOGY • Index is published annually – reviews past three fiscal years • 36 public and 35 private institutions • Actual donor transactions, not survey responses • Cash payment basis, not pledges • Does not include: - Soft credits - Matching gift payments 08/10/2011 Footer 3
  • 4. MEDIAN CHANGE IN REVENUE 2008 2009 2010 6.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 3.0% -12.7% -14.8% -14.4% Private Public Overall 08/10/2011 Footer 4
  • 5. MEDIAN REVENUE PER DONOR 2008 2009 2010 $723 $687 $610 $512 $479 $450 $384 $385 $348 Private Public Overall 08/10/2011 Footer 5
  • 6. MEDIAN CHANGE IN DONOR COUNTS 2008 2009 2010 0.1% -0.8% -1.9% -2.3% -2.5% -2.6% -4.1% -4.6% -7.1% Private Public Overall 08/10/2011 Footer 6
  • 8. MEDIAN CHANGE IN NEW DONORS 2008 2009 2010 2.9% 2.0% -0.4% -1.9% -4.1% -4.7% -6.6% -7.7% -12.1% Private Public Overall 08/10/2011 Footer 8
  • 9. MEDIAN NEW DONOR RETENTION RATE 2008 2009 2010 30% 30% 27% 30% 27% 27% 24% 25% 25% Private Public Overall 08/10/2011 Footer 9
  • 10. RETENTION 08/10/2011 Footer 10
  • 11. MEDIAN DONOR RETENTION RATES 2008 2009 2010 68% 67% 67% 63% 58% 58% 62% 62% 56% Private Public Overall 08/10/2011 Footer 11
  • 12. MEDIAN CHANGE IN RETAINED DONOR REVENUE 2008 2009 2010 8.5% 6.1% 4.5% 3.8% 2.6% 3.2% -12.5% -13.0% -14.8% Private Public Overall 08/10/2011 Footer 12
  • 13. MEDIAN MULTI-YEAR DONOR RETENTION RATES 2008 2009 2010 71% 71% 70% 67% 67% 63% 63% 65% 60% Private Public Overall 08/10/2011 Footer 13
  • 14. R E A C T I VAT I O N 08/10/2011 Footer 14
  • 15. MEDIAN DONOR REACTIVATION RATES 2008 2009 2010 20% 18% 17% 18% 16% 16% 16% 14% 14% Private Public Overall 08/10/2011 Footer 15
  • 16. MEDIAN CHANGE IN REACTIVATED DONOR REVENUE 2008 2009 2010 21.0% 16.0% 17.0% 0.1% -4.4% -0.2% -13.5% -16.5% -15.5% Private Public Overall 08/10/2011 Footer 16
  • 17. INDUSTRY COMPARISON: NATIONAL INDEX 08/10/2011 Footer 17
  • 19. CLOSER LOOK – YOUNG ALUMNI • Metrics shown are based on data gathered in the following donorCentrics benchmarking groups: - Big 10/Big 12 Benchmarking group consists of institutions in the Big 10 and Big 12 athletic conference (Undergraduate and Graduate Alumni Giving) - Private College Consortium consists of private colleges that are reunion- focused (Undergraduate Alumni Giving) - Business School group consists of top-ranked graduate business schools - Law School group consists of top-ranked law schools 08/10/2011 Footer 19
  • 20. FY2010 PARTICIPATION RATE – 90’S AND 00’S 50.0% 45.0% Class of 1990-1999 Class of 2000-2009 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.7% 20.0% 18.8% 18% 17.0% 15.0% 12.3% 12.5% 10.0% 6.3% 5.0% 4.1% 0.0% Big 10/Big 12 Private College Consortium Business Law 08/10/2011 Footer 20
  • 21. 5 YEAR PARTICIPATION RATE – 90’S AND 00’S 100% 90% 1990-1999 2000-2009 80% 70% 60% 56% 52% 50% 40% 39% 40% 29% 31% 30% 20% 18% 13% 10% 0% Big 10/Big 12 Private College Consortium Business Law 08/10/2011 Footer 21
  • 22. RETENTION RATES – 90’S AND 00’S 100% 90% 1990-1999 2000-2009 80% 70% 66% 65% 59% 60% 54% 51% 48% 49% 50% 42% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Big 10/Big 12 Private College Consortium Business Law 08/10/2011 Footer 22
  • 24. INTERNET GIVING – HIGHER EDUCATION FY10 % of Gifts via % of Revenue Revenue per Online Online Online Gift Big 10 /Big 12 6% 6% $270 Private College Consortium 17% 11% $265 Business 29% 18% $290 Law 15% 10% $430 08/10/2011 Footer 24
  • 25. INDUSTRY COMPARISON: ONLINE GIVING FROM NATIONAL INDEX 08/10/2011 Footer 25
  • 27. HIGH END GIVING • Data from 12 large public schools, gifts of $1,000-$50,000 in a given year • On average, it took 13.2 years for a donor to make his/her first $1,000+ gift. • Those who gave $1,000+ in FY2009, gave about 73% of the years that they were on file • 57% of them made a first gift less than $100 • However, the higher the first gift, the quicker they became one of these donors. • Of those that eventually gave $1,000+, a $100 first time donor did so at about a 30% faster rate than a $1-24 dollars donor 08/10/2011 Footer 27
  • 28. ! ! 08/10/2011 Footer 28
  • 29. GIVING BY LEVEL FOR SMALL PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS Donors Revenue 35% 30% 25% 20% % or Total 15% 10% 5% 0% $1-24 $25-49 $50-99 $100- $250- $500- $1000- $1500- $2500- $5000- $10000- $25000- $50000+ 249 499 999 1499 2499 4999 9999 24999 49999 08/10/2011 Footer 29
  • 30. GIVING BY LEVEL FOR LARGE PUBLIC 30% Donors Revenue 25% 20% % of Total 15% 10% 5% 0% $1-24 $25-49 $50-99 $100- $250- $500- $1000- $1500- $2500- $5000- $10000- $25000- $50000+ 249 499 999 1499 2499 4999 9999 24999 49999 08/10/2011 Footer 30