SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 13
Baixar para ler offline
How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books                                                21/10/11 21:15




                                                                                                                         Font Size: A A A



     How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care
     OCTOBER 27, 2011


     Arnold Relman




                                                                                                                     Ed Kashi/VII
                                A nurse consulting a doctor via Mr. Rounder the Robot, Hackensack University Medical Center,
                                                                Hackensack, New Jersey, 2005


     1.
     The US is facing a major crisis in the cost of health care. Corrected for
     inflation, health expenditures in the public sector are nearly doubling each
     decade, and those in the private sector are increasing even more rapidly.
     According to virtually all economists, this financial burden, which is now
     consuming about 17 percent of our entire economic output (far more than in
     any other country), cannot be sustained much longer. The federal share,
     including payments for Medicare and Medicaid, was 23 percent of the
     national budget in 2009 and is a prime cause of the deficit. 1
     There is no current prospect of raising taxes. If the federal long-term debt is
     to be reduced, government health expenditures on Medicare and Medicaid
     must be controlled. However, there is no agreement in Washington on how
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true           Pagina 1 di 13
How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books                                         21/10/11 21:15



     that can or should be done. Both parties claim to have the answer but, as I
     will make clear, no initiatives proposed by either party have much chance of
     significantly slowing the rise in federal health costs without reducing access
     to needed services. Major reform will be required, but that is not even under
     consideration. In any case, health legislation is currently stalled by a bitter
     political deadlock. No initiatives to improve health care will come out of
     Congress until after the 2012 elections and, unless the results are
     unexpectedly decisive, probably not even then. Still, as I will explain here,
     there is a chance that new developments in the way physicians are
     organizing themselves to deliver care might improve the currently dismal
     prospects for action on major reform and cost control.
     2.
     In his September 8 address to Congress, the President spoke of the urgent
     need to control the costs of Medicare. To do this he is relying principally on
     the Affordable Care Act, passed by Democrats in March 2010. The Act
     expands insurance coverage but, as already explained in these pages, 2 it is
     not likely to slow the rise of costs significantly. Republicans in Congress are
     seeking to stop it from being implemented and their potential candidates for
     president are demanding its repeal, while state governments that are
     controlled by Republicans are challenging its constitutionality in federal
     courts. They question the Act’s mandate that all citizens not covered by
     public or private insurance plans be required to purchase private insurance
     or incur a tax penalty. The Republican legal challenge has so far received a
     divided reception in lower courts and will probably reach the Supreme Court
     next year. The mandate is a critical part of the Act because private insurers
     will not offer coverage at affordable prices to all applicants, as the Act
     assumes, unless everyone—young and healthy included—is required to be
     insured. Whatever the Court’s decision, it will not have much effect on
     health costs because the law does very little or nothing to address some of
     the most important causes of the high cost of care and its rapid inflation. 3
     First, the Act does not replace—but expands—the investor-owned private
     health insurance industry. According to the actuary for the government’s
     Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), this industry’s overhead
     and profits currently add over $152 billion to the cost of care. 4
     Second, the Act does not change the method of payment for most medical

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true    Pagina 2 di 13
How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books                                         21/10/11 21:15



     care, which is based on fees for each procedure and therefore encourages
     specialists to use expensive procedures excessively, while giving all
     physicians strong financial incentives to provide more services than needed.
     Third, it does nothing to change the current fragmentation of medical care.
     This allows specialists to practice in isolation without restraints on cost,
     causes duplication and disorganization of services, and discourages the use
     of primary care physicians. The latter are essential to cost-effective care
     because they help patients avoid unnecessary, expensive procedures. But
     with specialists earning much higher incomes per unit of working time,
     primary care doctors are disappearing. The Act addresses this problem, but
     only by providing minimal financial incentives to primary care doctors; they
     are unlikely to make much difference.
     In the absence of effective general solutions for these causes of rising costs,
     there is little chance that the Act will “bend the curve” of medical inflation
     as Democrats hope. The law does, however, propose to cover the cost of
     adding millions of beneficiaries to Medicaid and to private plans over ten
     years. It does this by cutting payments to the private “Medicare Advantage”
     plans now chosen by some 12 million Medicare beneficiaries, and by
     eliminating tax exemptions for expensive insurance coverage offered by
     employers to favored employees. Apart from two ill-conceived and probably
     unworkable exceptions, the Act offers no other broad initiatives directly
     aimed at reducing costs.
     The first exception, in Section 3022 of the Act, proposes to share any
     Medicare savings with so-called accountable care organizations (ACOs).
     ACOs are defined as federally certified multispecialty groups of physicians
     that collaborate with one or more hospitals and contract with Medicare to
     provide comprehensive care to a designated group of patients on a fee-for-
     service basis. ACOs would in principle have incentives to control costs
     because the government would give them a share of any savings they
     produced by using fewer resources in delivering good care. But the 126
     pages of regulations proposed to govern this program, published by the
     Department of Health and Human Services on April 7, 2011, 5 threaten to
     undermine it. The regulations were considered so onerous and impractical,
     and the benefits to participating ACOs so dubious, that almost all
     multispecialty medical groups have indicated they would not participate. 6


http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true    Pagina 3 di 13
How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books                                         21/10/11 21:15



     Even if the regulations are substantially modified before they are fully
     adopted, the CMS, which would administer the program, probably could not
     handle the extra work required to manage more than a relatively small
     number of participating ACOs. This program is therefore not likely to have
     much effect on health care costs.
     Section 3403 of the Act is often cited as a powerful tool for controlling
     costs, but there is much reason to be skeptical. It establishes an Independent
     Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), a presidentially appointed independent
     committee of fifteen full-time members. If government spending rises too
     rapidly, the IPAB must offer proposals for cost control, and Congress must
     act on them or enact its own measures for equivalent savings. However, the
     law stipulates that the IPAB cannot reduce Medicare benefits or increase
     Medicare premiums, and it defers any proposed reductions in payments to
     hospitals for a few years. The IPAB would thus be limited to suggesting cuts
     in payments to physicians, payments for some ambulatory services such as
     emergency room visits, and payments for Medicare Advantage plans and
     Medicare Part D prescription drugs.
     Unless the IPAB were to recommend some limitation to their total income,
     physicians could easily respond to reduced fee schedules by providing more
     services, such as performing more diagnostic tests. Physicians’ average
     incomes have not kept pace with the rising costs of managing an office, and
     there is widespread unhappiness among the profession over the threat of cuts
     in payment that have been mandated by past legislation. Some physicians
     are now refusing to see new Medicare patients for this reason, so I doubt
     there would be support in Congress for much further reduction in fee
     schedules.
     Moreover, payments to physicians account for only about a fifth of total
     health expenditures. The other four fifths consist largely of costs of hospital
     and nursing home care as well as payments for drugs and other medical
     products, and the overhead costs of private insurers. A realistic reduction of
     payments to doctors could at most save one or two percent of total costs, and
     wouldn’t necessarily slow inflation. The other cost-saving options left open
     to the IPAB are also limited in scope and would have relatively little effect
     on “bending the curve.” Furthermore, and most importantly, there will
     probably be fierce Republican opposition in Congress to IPAB appointments
     and funding, which will hamstring its function. The IPAB’s prospects for
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true    Pagina 4 di 13
How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books                                         21/10/11 21:15



     success are therefore dim.
     3.
     Republicans in Congress have pretty much limited their health policy to an
     unyielding opposition to “Obamacare,” to calls for reform of malpractice
     litigation, and to their traditional reliance on “market forces.” Their latest
     initiative is the proposal by Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin to
     privatize Medicare and change federal support of Medicaid by substituting
     fixed grants for its current open-ended commitment to paying a large share
     of costs to the states. Under his proposal the Medicare system covering most
     of the medical costs of elderly citizens would be gradually replaced by a
     federal voucher system. Starting in 2022 each new Medicare beneficiary
     would choose a private insurance plan and the government would give
     participants in the plan a voucher to help pay for coverage. The voucher
     would start at $8,000, which would grow only according to the Consumer
     Price Index, but with some undefined adjustment for people who are older
     and sicker.
     However, actuarial experts predict a near doubling of total Medicare costs
     within a decade; so Ryan’s proposed vouchers would fall far behind actual
     costs, and beneficiaries would have an increasing financial burden. The
     Ryan plan reduces federal outlays for Medicare by shifting costs to patients.
     It has been passed by the Republican majority in the House, but not by the
     Senate, and the President strongly opposes it.
     Defending Ryan’s plan, Republicans say that under current policies
     Medicare will soon be bankrupt. They are correct that rising Medicare costs
     are unsustainable, but the fact remains that the Ryan voucher plan puts an
     intolerable burden on the elderly and would undoubtedly reduce their access
     to needed care. We can predict, for example, that patients would make fewer
     visits to physicians for checkups and reduce their compliance with
     expensive drug regimens.
     As for Ryan’s proposal to reduce Medicaid outlays by making fixed grants
     to states, the states would have considerable discretion in spending these
     grants, and their deficits would almost certainly force them to curtail
     Medicaid services in order to meet other budgetary needs. The grant idea,
     although favored by some state governors, has provoked wide opposition

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true    Pagina 5 di 13
How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books                                         21/10/11 21:15



     because it threatens the medical services needed by low-income citizens, and
     because Medicaid money now also supports nursing home care for the
     elderly.
     4.
     If neither party is proposing effective solutions to the cost crisis, and
     political deadlock in Washington is preventing the consideration of new
     ideas, are we doomed to witness a slowly collapsing health care system that
     eventually will provide adequate care only to those who can afford to pay?
     In his latest book on health care, 7 the Princeton sociologist Paul Starr, who
     worked on the ill-fated Clinton Health Security Plan, despairs of any
     political action that could bring about major reform. However, a new
     movement in the medical profession might help to start such reform by
     reconfiguring the way medicine will be practiced.
     Traditionally, physicians have practiced either alone or in small partnerships
     with a single specialty, such as cardiology. Now a big shift to large groups
     containing many specialties is taking place. These multispecialty practices
     vary in size, but include physicians in almost all fields. Primary care
     physicians usually make up almost half the medical staff. They counsel
     patients and coordinate care by the specialists. Groups usually share
     common facilities, medical records, scheduling, and billing, and their
     physicians cooperate in the care of patients.
     Many multispecialty groups pay doctors at least in part with base salaries,
     with the rest of their compensation derived from each physician’s collected
     fees. Only a few pay entirely by salary, but that may change. Most groups
     are owned by physicians, but many are now being organized and managed
     by hospitals. Well-established large groups owned by physicians include the
     Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Permanente Medical Group, Intermountain
     Healthcare, Scott & White, Marshfield Clinic, Geisinger Health System,
     Lahey Clinic, and Harvard Vanguard. Many smaller physician-owned
     groups now exist throughout the country (though there are only a few in the
     Southeast), and their number is growing rapidly. So are groups owned by
     hospitals, including academic medical centers as well as large community
     hospitals. An unknown, but probably substantial, proportion of these groups
     are not for profit; i.e., they have no investors and use any net income to
     maintain and improve facilities and services.

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true    Pagina 6 di 13
How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books                                         21/10/11 21:15



     The American Medical Group Association (AMGA) is the trade
     organization that represents most multispecialty physician-owned groups.
     The American Hospital Association (AHA) is the trade organization for
     almost all general hospitals. In recent communications with senior officials
     at the AMGA and the AHA, I learned that membership in the AMGA now
     stands at about four hundred groups, the highest ever, and is increasing at an
     unprecedented rate of about 10 percent annually. These four hundred
     multispecialty groups employ about 117,000 full-time medical doctors, but
     since many of their physicians work less than full-time, the total number of
     doctors now employed by such groups is probably close to 140,000, not
     counting the unknown number in physician-owned groups that are not
     members of the AMGA.
     The AHA says that a 2010 survey of its member hospitals reveals that they
     employed roughly 120,000 practicing physicians, but the survey did not
     disclose how many were in multispecialty group practices. Allowing for this
     incomplete reporting, the total number of physicians now practicing in
     multispecialty groups could be close to 200,000, or about a quarter of all
     practicing physicians, and this number is increasing rapidly.
     There are many reasons for this change. Young doctors now finish their
     training with substantial debt, often in the range of $150,000 or more. The
     prospect of assuming even more debt to start their own practice is daunting.
     Joining a multispecialty group means less financial risk and provides ready-
     made facilities and a staff to schedule patients and bill for services. Groups
     usually offer an income fully competitive with that to be expected in
     independent private practice. They often pay better fringe benefits than solo
     practitioners could provide for themselves.
     Half of all medical students are now women, and soon they will represent
     nearly half of all practicing physicians. Women are more likely than men to
     choose some type of primary care practice, and I and others have found that
     many of them particularly appreciate the opportunity afforded by group
     practice to share responsibilities and to limit their working time. Many
     young male physicians are also glad to be working in a less competitive and
     more collegial environment, with opportunities to choose limited working
     hours.
     In short, physicians are increasingly looking for arrangements that allow

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true    Pagina 7 di 13
How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books                                         21/10/11 21:15



     them to focus more on the practice of medicine and less on managing a
     business. They also want at least a little more time for personal and family
     life. Practice in multispecialty groups is the obvious answer. Single-specialty
     groups offer some similar advantages, but are not as attractive. They are
     smaller, have fewer resources, and will not be able to adapt as well to the
     new payment methods that government and private payers intend to employ.
     Meanwhile, evidence has been accumulating that organized care by multi-
     specialty groups provides good medical service and has the potential of
     saving much money. 8 This is because, as most clearly shown by John
     Wennberg and his colleagues at Dartmouth, 9 much of the care prescribed
     and provided by independent specialists is unnecessary. Physician-owned
     not-for-profit groups, particularly those that pay their doctors at least partly
     by salaries, are not as likely to provide unnecessary services or to
     recommend hospitalization when it is optional. Their physicians have few
     financial incentives to do so, and the services of their specialists are
     coordinated with their primary care doctors, who usually recommend the
     simplest and least expensive choices consistent with good medical care.
     However, today’s competitive health care market, with its private health
     insurance companies and fee-for-service payment system, severely limits the
     potential cost savings of a delivery system based on not-for-profit group
     practice. Private insurers contribute to high costs not only because of their
     profits and overhead, as already noted, but because doctors and hospitals
     have to pay the considerable costs of billing the insurance companies and
     collecting money from them. I favor a much less expensive single public
     payer system supported by a universal, progressive, designated health care
     tax. Fee-for-service payment gives doctors incentives to provide more
     services than needed and allows for fraudulent billing. It should be replaced
     by an advance payment to physicians for comprehensive care on a per capita
     basis.
     To receive such payment, group practices would have to reimburse their
     physicians largely by salary. Regulations would require open enrollment of
     patients; to limit the risk of fixed payment for comprehensive care, groups
     would need public reinsurance or other financial guarantee to protect against
     the possibility that some patients might need expensive services.
     There is much reason to believe that such a reformed system could deliver

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true    Pagina 8 di 13
How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books                                         21/10/11 21:15



     good care for all at considerably less cost and could also control cost
     inflation 10 —although such a system does not have the remotest chance of
     being legislated by our national government anytime soon. But what if, as
     seems likely, the rapid trend toward group practice that I have described
     were to continue, and almost all medical care were ultimately to be provided
     through multispecialty group practices? Despite the limitations imposed by
     the existing health care market, the advantages of organized care might
     become obvious not only to patients but to business employers and even to
     legislators and policymakers in Washington.
     The question would then arise: If restructuring the delivery of medical care
     is so helpful, why not reform the insurance and payment of care as well?
     Supported by most of the medical profession and by most voters, major
     reform might finally be seriously discussed. It might become easier to pass
     legislation that created a system based on a tax-supported single-payer
     system, with prepaid comprehensive care for all. Obviously, there is no
     guarantee this would happen. Indeed, the odds would still be against it. But
     if most physicians were to be employed in multispecialty groups, the
     growing number of practitioners now supporting major reform would
     probably become a strong majority. This could well change the climate of
     opinion enough to influence legislation.
     Dr. Francis J. Crosson, former executive director of the Kaiser-Permanente
     physicians’ organization and a prominent advocate for physician-managed
     groups becoming federally certified ACOs, believes that they will be
     essential for the future control of health costs. 11 But unlike the broad
     reforms I favor, in the system he envisions these group practices would
     function in a competitive marketplace, in which public and private insurers
     would offer them financial incentives to improve care, and market forces
     would be expected to control prices. However, I am convinced that good
     affordable universal care will require major reform of all parts of the system
     because market forces and the current system have clearly encouraged
     excessive medical treatment and diagnostic testing. Insurance coverage will
     need to be replaced by tax-supported universal access to medical care, which
     should change from a competitive market to a not-for-profit social
     service. 12
     Hospitals, as we have seen, are now hiring more physicians to work in
     groups. As hospital employees, these physicians inevitably feel pressure to
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true    Pagina 9 di 13
How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books                                         21/10/11 21:15



     protect their employers’ income by filling beds and using hospital facilities
     for tests and procedures. They are less likely to control costs than physicians
     in independent not-for-profit groups. It is not yet clear which type of group
     will dominate, but those owned by physicians would probably be more
     supportive of reform.
     The greatest resistance to reform would come from the private insurance
     industry. But with the savings that a reformed health system would generate,
     it should be possible for whatever agency collects the health care tax to buy
     out the industry’s investors. Some current employees of insurance
     companies might be usefully employed in a new single-payer system.
     Moreover, it seems likely that the jobs lost in health insurance companies
     would be offset by new jobs created through the expansion of an economy
     relieved of unsustainable health costs.
     I do not underestimate the complexity of the task or the strength of
     opposition to reform by vested interests, and by conservatives who rail
     against a “government takeover” of health care. Reform could be delayed
     for years, or indefinitely. However, the status quo will soon no longer be
     tenable because of rising costs. New thinking about major reform and
     private health insurance will be necessary.
     Private investor-owned health insurance appeared quite suddenly in the final
     few decades of the last century, reaping the profits from the health coverage
     that employers were offering to their employees. But except for a brief and
     unpopular era of cost control by “managed care” in the 1990s, the private
     insurance industry has not contributed anything to the health care system
     nearly comparable in value to the costs it has added.
     In some European countries, private insurance companies are an integral
     part of popular and less expensive health care systems, but they are usually
     not-for-profit and are closely regulated by government. In Switzerland, for
     example, the government mandates universal not-for-profit private insurance
     coverage for most medical services; it also requires uniform benefits and
     controls costs by regulating insurance premiums and the fees paid to
     physicians. The government also owns most of the major hospitals. In view
     of our distinctive political and economic traditions, and cultural diversity,
     we could not easily adopt this or any other foreign system. We will have to
     find our own health care solutions.

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true   Pagina 10 di 13
How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books                                         21/10/11 21:15



     Health reform might begin in the states. Vermont has recently approved a
     single-payer system that includes a public board to develop a global health
     budget and new reimbursement methods to replace fee-for-service payment.
     The board will help physicians to form multispecialty groups that can accept
     prior payments for comprehensive care of patients. Many other details
     remain to be worked out. Federal permission for the state to pool all
     government health care funds will be needed before the plan can become
     operative, which is estimated for 2017. 13 Similar initiatives may be
     introduced in other states; if successful, state plans would encourage
     Congress to enact national reforms.
     5.
     The net effect of the reformed system I have described here on the
     government’s costs can only be guessed at, but savings would be very large.
     Any initial increases in expenditures owing to expanded coverage would
     certainly be more than balanced by savings later on. However, government
     would hold the ultimate cost-controlling weapon because it would determine
     the rates at which it reimbursed groups for prepaid, comprehensive care, and
     would thereby have full control of health care expenditures. If everyone
     (including politicians and government officials) were in the system, there
     would be little chance that the government would underfund it, or allow its
     services to deteriorate.
     Such reforms are the best—perhaps the only—hope of preserving the
     benefits of Medicare and Medicaid and achieving affordable universal
     access to care. In today’s political climate these reforms have no chance, but
     this could change if physicians continue to join groups and transform the
     organization of medical care. If encouraged by public opinion and by
     physicians, the members of Congress might see the clear advantages of the
     group practice model. They might then legislate the broad reforms in
     insurance and payment that would make this model much more effective. If
     that were to happen, the medical profession would have made an important,
     although unplanned, contribution to the rescue of the US health care system.



1. 1
   Lisa Potetz and Juliette Cubanski, A Primer on Medicare Financing , Henry

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true   Pagina 11 di 13
How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books                                         21/10/11 21:15




      Kaiser Family Foundation, July 2009, Exhibit 2. ↩
 2. 2
    Jonathan Oberlander and Theodore R. Marmor, "The Health Bill Explained
    at Last," The New York Review , August 19, 2010. ↩
 3. 3
    Arnold Relman, "Health Care: The Disquieting Truth," The New York
    Review , September 30, 2010. ↩
 4. 4
    Sean P. Keehan et al., "National Health Spending Projections Through 2020:
    Economic Recovery and Reform Drive Faster Spending Growth,"
    HealthAffairs , Vol. 30, No. 8 (August 2011). ↩
 5. 5
    Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Register , Part II, Vol.
    76, No. 67 (April 7, 2011). ↩
 6. 6
    Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, "Medical Group Pans Key Element of Obama
    Health Plan," The Boston Globe , May 12, 2011. ↩
 7. 7
    Remedy and Reaction: The Peculiar American Struggle Over Health Care
    Reform (Yale University Press, 2011.) ↩
 8. 8
    Kenneth H. Chuang, Harold S. Luft, and R. Adams Dudley, "The Clinical
    and Economic Performance of Prepaid Group Practice," Toward a 21st
    Century Health System , edited by Alain C. Enthoven and Laura A. Tollen
    (Jossey-Bass, 2004); and Brent C. James and Lucy A. Savitz, "How
    Intermountain Trimmed Health Care Costs Through Robust Quality
    Improvement Efforts," HealthAffairs , Vol. 30, No. 6 (June 2011). ↩
 9. 9
    John E. Wennberg, Tracking Medicine: A Researcher's Quest to Understand
    Health Care (Oxford University Press, 2010). ↩
10. 10

 http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true   Pagina 12 di 13
How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books                                         21/10/11 21:15



      Arnold Relman, A Second Opinion: Rescuing America's Health Care
      (PublicAffairs, 2010). ↩
11. 11
    Francis J. Crosson, "The Accountable Care Organization: Whatever Its
    Growing Pains, the Concept Is Too Vitally Important to Fail," HealthAffairs
    , Vol. 30, No. 7 (July 2011). ↩
12. 12
    Relman, A Second Opinion . ↩
13. 13
    Anya Rader Wallack, "Single Payer Ahead—Cost Control and the Evolving
    Vermont Model," The New England Journal of Medicine , Vol. 365 (August
    18, 2011). ↩



      Copyright © 1963-2011 NYREV, Inc. All rights reserved.




 http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true   Pagina 13 di 13

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Update on National Health Reform: A Moving Target
Update on National Health Reform:  A Moving TargetUpdate on National Health Reform:  A Moving Target
Update on National Health Reform: A Moving Targetsoder145
 
Obamacare - The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - ACA
Obamacare - The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - ACAObamacare - The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - ACA
Obamacare - The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - ACAAndrew F. Bennett
 
The Affordable Care Act And Its Effect On American Healthcare (3)
The Affordable Care Act And Its Effect On American Healthcare (3)The Affordable Care Act And Its Effect On American Healthcare (3)
The Affordable Care Act And Its Effect On American Healthcare (3)amande1
 
TEXT: Protecting Texas' Liability Reforms (PIAA 2014)
TEXT: Protecting Texas' Liability Reforms (PIAA 2014)TEXT: Protecting Texas' Liability Reforms (PIAA 2014)
TEXT: Protecting Texas' Liability Reforms (PIAA 2014)Steve Levine
 
State Medicaid Impact Report
State Medicaid Impact ReportState Medicaid Impact Report
State Medicaid Impact ReportPeter Ho
 
Healthcare slide show
Healthcare slide showHealthcare slide show
Healthcare slide showgeoffb48
 
GWAHU: Health Reform -- Where Are We Now?
GWAHU: Health Reform -- Where Are We Now?GWAHU: Health Reform -- Where Are We Now?
GWAHU: Health Reform -- Where Are We Now?Galen Institute
 
The macro trends in healthcare and the associated career
The macro trends in healthcare and the associated careerThe macro trends in healthcare and the associated career
The macro trends in healthcare and the associated careershivani rana
 
Please Help Me Understand the Affordable Care Act....No Politics Please!!!!
Please Help Me Understand the Affordable Care Act....No Politics Please!!!!Please Help Me Understand the Affordable Care Act....No Politics Please!!!!
Please Help Me Understand the Affordable Care Act....No Politics Please!!!!HRBIMS
 
US health care system overview 1
US health care system  overview 1US health care system  overview 1
US health care system overview 1nithinmohantk
 
Universal Health Insurance Coverage in the United States
Universal Health Insurance Coverage in the United StatesUniversal Health Insurance Coverage in the United States
Universal Health Insurance Coverage in the United StatesBrian Wells, MD, MS, MPH
 
Obamacare in Pictures: Visualizing the Effects of the Patient Protection and ...
Obamacare in Pictures: Visualizing the Effects of the Patient Protection and ...Obamacare in Pictures: Visualizing the Effects of the Patient Protection and ...
Obamacare in Pictures: Visualizing the Effects of the Patient Protection and ...The Heritage Foundation
 

Mais procurados (20)

Do-it-Yourself Health Care –The Health Savings Account
Do-it-Yourself Health Care –The Health Savings AccountDo-it-Yourself Health Care –The Health Savings Account
Do-it-Yourself Health Care –The Health Savings Account
 
Health system in USA
Health system in USAHealth system in USA
Health system in USA
 
National Health Care Reform 2009
National Health Care Reform 2009National Health Care Reform 2009
National Health Care Reform 2009
 
Health Reform, Past and Present
Health Reform, Past and PresentHealth Reform, Past and Present
Health Reform, Past and Present
 
Update on National Health Reform: A Moving Target
Update on National Health Reform:  A Moving TargetUpdate on National Health Reform:  A Moving Target
Update on National Health Reform: A Moving Target
 
Health Care Economics and Financing 2009
Health Care Economics and Financing 2009Health Care Economics and Financing 2009
Health Care Economics and Financing 2009
 
Obamacare - The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - ACA
Obamacare - The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - ACAObamacare - The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - ACA
Obamacare - The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - ACA
 
The Affordable Care Act And Its Effect On American Healthcare (3)
The Affordable Care Act And Its Effect On American Healthcare (3)The Affordable Care Act And Its Effect On American Healthcare (3)
The Affordable Care Act And Its Effect On American Healthcare (3)
 
TEXT: Protecting Texas' Liability Reforms (PIAA 2014)
TEXT: Protecting Texas' Liability Reforms (PIAA 2014)TEXT: Protecting Texas' Liability Reforms (PIAA 2014)
TEXT: Protecting Texas' Liability Reforms (PIAA 2014)
 
State Medicaid Impact Report
State Medicaid Impact ReportState Medicaid Impact Report
State Medicaid Impact Report
 
Healthcare slide show
Healthcare slide showHealthcare slide show
Healthcare slide show
 
GWAHU: Health Reform -- Where Are We Now?
GWAHU: Health Reform -- Where Are We Now?GWAHU: Health Reform -- Where Are We Now?
GWAHU: Health Reform -- Where Are We Now?
 
SAC410 chapters 9 and 10
SAC410 chapters 9 and 10SAC410 chapters 9 and 10
SAC410 chapters 9 and 10
 
The macro trends in healthcare and the associated career
The macro trends in healthcare and the associated careerThe macro trends in healthcare and the associated career
The macro trends in healthcare and the associated career
 
Please Help Me Understand the Affordable Care Act....No Politics Please!!!!
Please Help Me Understand the Affordable Care Act....No Politics Please!!!!Please Help Me Understand the Affordable Care Act....No Politics Please!!!!
Please Help Me Understand the Affordable Care Act....No Politics Please!!!!
 
US health care system overview 1
US health care system  overview 1US health care system  overview 1
US health care system overview 1
 
Ojchd.000523
Ojchd.000523Ojchd.000523
Ojchd.000523
 
Universal Health Insurance Coverage in the United States
Universal Health Insurance Coverage in the United StatesUniversal Health Insurance Coverage in the United States
Universal Health Insurance Coverage in the United States
 
Obamacare in Pictures: Visualizing the Effects of the Patient Protection and ...
Obamacare in Pictures: Visualizing the Effects of the Patient Protection and ...Obamacare in Pictures: Visualizing the Effects of the Patient Protection and ...
Obamacare in Pictures: Visualizing the Effects of the Patient Protection and ...
 
SAC410 chapters 11 and 12
SAC410 chapters 11 and 12SAC410 chapters 11 and 12
SAC410 chapters 11 and 12
 

Destaque

Favaretti hph in italia 2011
Favaretti hph in italia 2011Favaretti hph in italia 2011
Favaretti hph in italia 2011Carlo Favaretti
 
High value cost conscious copia
High value cost conscious copiaHigh value cost conscious copia
High value cost conscious copiaCarlo Favaretti
 
Patient organizations funding
Patient organizations fundingPatient organizations funding
Patient organizations fundingCarlo Favaretti
 
Inequalities quadratic, fractional & irrational form
Inequalities   quadratic, fractional & irrational formInequalities   quadratic, fractional & irrational form
Inequalities quadratic, fractional & irrational formLily Maryati
 

Destaque (7)

Favaretti hph in italia 2011
Favaretti hph in italia 2011Favaretti hph in italia 2011
Favaretti hph in italia 2011
 
High value cost conscious copia
High value cost conscious copiaHigh value cost conscious copia
High value cost conscious copia
 
Summer activities
Summer activitiesSummer activities
Summer activities
 
Patient organizations funding
Patient organizations fundingPatient organizations funding
Patient organizations funding
 
01 ballard
01 ballard01 ballard
01 ballard
 
Rapporto frenk
Rapporto frenk Rapporto frenk
Rapporto frenk
 
Inequalities quadratic, fractional & irrational form
Inequalities   quadratic, fractional & irrational formInequalities   quadratic, fractional & irrational form
Inequalities quadratic, fractional & irrational form
 

Semelhante a How doctors could rescue health care by arnold relman | the new york review of books

HCS 410 ACA.edited final copy
HCS 410 ACA.edited final copyHCS 410 ACA.edited final copy
HCS 410 ACA.edited final copyGina Leymeister
 
Medicare Spending Report
Medicare Spending ReportMedicare Spending Report
Medicare Spending ReportDenise Enriquez
 
Us Healthcare Reform
Us Healthcare ReformUs Healthcare Reform
Us Healthcare ReformAndrea Turner
 
STR 403 Medicare Paper
STR 403 Medicare PaperSTR 403 Medicare Paper
STR 403 Medicare PaperNishant Saboo
 
Primary Care And Health Care
Primary Care And Health CarePrimary Care And Health Care
Primary Care And Health CareLindsey Williams
 
Essay On Hospital Revenue
Essay On Hospital RevenueEssay On Hospital Revenue
Essay On Hospital RevenueJessica Howard
 
Economic Impact Of Affordable Care Act Essay
Economic Impact Of Affordable Care Act EssayEconomic Impact Of Affordable Care Act Essay
Economic Impact Of Affordable Care Act EssayPaper Writers UK
 
Pharmacare Reforms In Canada
Pharmacare Reforms In CanadaPharmacare Reforms In Canada
Pharmacare Reforms In CanadaErica Wright
 
The Federal Perspective on Coverage of Medications to Treat Obesity: Consider...
The Federal Perspective on Coverage of Medications to Treat Obesity: Consider...The Federal Perspective on Coverage of Medications to Treat Obesity: Consider...
The Federal Perspective on Coverage of Medications to Treat Obesity: Consider...Congressional Budget Office
 
Literarture Review Map
Literarture Review MapLiterarture Review Map
Literarture Review MapMichael Rendon
 
Connor Maser Annual RBM Seminar Essay Word
Connor Maser Annual RBM Seminar Essay WordConnor Maser Annual RBM Seminar Essay Word
Connor Maser Annual RBM Seminar Essay WordConnor Maser
 
North Oakland Tea Party Presentation 8.23.12
North Oakland Tea Party Presentation 8.23.12North Oakland Tea Party Presentation 8.23.12
North Oakland Tea Party Presentation 8.23.12MattMcCord
 
US Healthcare Reform Landscape - Addendum to June 2018 Presentation to the Ch...
US Healthcare Reform Landscape - Addendum to June 2018 Presentation to the Ch...US Healthcare Reform Landscape - Addendum to June 2018 Presentation to the Ch...
US Healthcare Reform Landscape - Addendum to June 2018 Presentation to the Ch...Dan Wellisch
 
The Health Care Marketplace
The Health Care MarketplaceThe Health Care Marketplace
The Health Care Marketplacecebyrne
 
Second essayTopic Monopoly in the united state of America.docx
Second essayTopic Monopoly in the united state of America.docxSecond essayTopic Monopoly in the united state of America.docx
Second essayTopic Monopoly in the united state of America.docxrtodd280
 
Health Care and Medicare Corporate Culture and the Three-Legged Stool
Health Care and Medicare Corporate Culture and the Three-Legged StoolHealth Care and Medicare Corporate Culture and the Three-Legged Stool
Health Care and Medicare Corporate Culture and the Three-Legged StoolLillian Rosenthal
 

Semelhante a How doctors could rescue health care by arnold relman | the new york review of books (20)

HCS 410 ACA.edited final copy
HCS 410 ACA.edited final copyHCS 410 ACA.edited final copy
HCS 410 ACA.edited final copy
 
Medicare Spending Report
Medicare Spending ReportMedicare Spending Report
Medicare Spending Report
 
HOSPITAL DOWNSIZING
HOSPITAL DOWNSIZING HOSPITAL DOWNSIZING
HOSPITAL DOWNSIZING
 
Us Healthcare Reform
Us Healthcare ReformUs Healthcare Reform
Us Healthcare Reform
 
STR 403 Medicare Paper
STR 403 Medicare PaperSTR 403 Medicare Paper
STR 403 Medicare Paper
 
Primary Care And Health Care
Primary Care And Health CarePrimary Care And Health Care
Primary Care And Health Care
 
Essay On Hospital Revenue
Essay On Hospital RevenueEssay On Hospital Revenue
Essay On Hospital Revenue
 
Economic Impact Of Affordable Care Act Essay
Economic Impact Of Affordable Care Act EssayEconomic Impact Of Affordable Care Act Essay
Economic Impact Of Affordable Care Act Essay
 
Health Care Reform Essay
Health Care Reform EssayHealth Care Reform Essay
Health Care Reform Essay
 
Pharmacare Reforms In Canada
Pharmacare Reforms In CanadaPharmacare Reforms In Canada
Pharmacare Reforms In Canada
 
The Federal Perspective on Coverage of Medications to Treat Obesity: Consider...
The Federal Perspective on Coverage of Medications to Treat Obesity: Consider...The Federal Perspective on Coverage of Medications to Treat Obesity: Consider...
The Federal Perspective on Coverage of Medications to Treat Obesity: Consider...
 
Literarture Review Map
Literarture Review MapLiterarture Review Map
Literarture Review Map
 
Connor Maser Annual RBM Seminar Essay Word
Connor Maser Annual RBM Seminar Essay WordConnor Maser Annual RBM Seminar Essay Word
Connor Maser Annual RBM Seminar Essay Word
 
North Oakland Tea Party Presentation 8.23.12
North Oakland Tea Party Presentation 8.23.12North Oakland Tea Party Presentation 8.23.12
North Oakland Tea Party Presentation 8.23.12
 
US Healthcare Reform Landscape - Addendum to June 2018 Presentation to the Ch...
US Healthcare Reform Landscape - Addendum to June 2018 Presentation to the Ch...US Healthcare Reform Landscape - Addendum to June 2018 Presentation to the Ch...
US Healthcare Reform Landscape - Addendum to June 2018 Presentation to the Ch...
 
Affordable Care Act Literature Review
Affordable Care Act Literature ReviewAffordable Care Act Literature Review
Affordable Care Act Literature Review
 
The Health Care Marketplace
The Health Care MarketplaceThe Health Care Marketplace
The Health Care Marketplace
 
Second essayTopic Monopoly in the united state of America.docx
Second essayTopic Monopoly in the united state of America.docxSecond essayTopic Monopoly in the united state of America.docx
Second essayTopic Monopoly in the united state of America.docx
 
Health Care and Medicare Corporate Culture and the Three-Legged Stool
Health Care and Medicare Corporate Culture and the Three-Legged StoolHealth Care and Medicare Corporate Culture and the Three-Legged Stool
Health Care and Medicare Corporate Culture and the Three-Legged Stool
 
Mechanisms used by managed care
Mechanisms used by managed careMechanisms used by managed care
Mechanisms used by managed care
 

Mais de Carlo Favaretti

Tackling wasteful-spending-on-health-highlights-revised OECD
Tackling wasteful-spending-on-health-highlights-revised OECDTackling wasteful-spending-on-health-highlights-revised OECD
Tackling wasteful-spending-on-health-highlights-revised OECDCarlo Favaretti
 
Fuffa questa? svegliatevi gentiluomini garantisti! il foglio
Fuffa questa? svegliatevi gentiluomini garantisti!   il foglioFuffa questa? svegliatevi gentiluomini garantisti!   il foglio
Fuffa questa? svegliatevi gentiluomini garantisti! il foglioCarlo Favaretti
 
Governo m5s lega, previsioni (con flaubert) sul governo vattelappesca - il fo...
Governo m5s lega, previsioni (con flaubert) sul governo vattelappesca - il fo...Governo m5s lega, previsioni (con flaubert) sul governo vattelappesca - il fo...
Governo m5s lega, previsioni (con flaubert) sul governo vattelappesca - il fo...Carlo Favaretti
 
La spoon river della sinistra l'espresso
La spoon river della sinistra   l'espressoLa spoon river della sinistra   l'espresso
La spoon river della sinistra l'espressoCarlo Favaretti
 
Tutti i problemi giornalistici e scientifici del libro sui vaccini di giulia ...
Tutti i problemi giornalistici e scientifici del libro sui vaccini di giulia ...Tutti i problemi giornalistici e scientifici del libro sui vaccini di giulia ...
Tutti i problemi giornalistici e scientifici del libro sui vaccini di giulia ...Carlo Favaretti
 
I migranti di tito boeri il foglio
I migranti di tito boeri   il foglioI migranti di tito boeri   il foglio
I migranti di tito boeri il foglioCarlo Favaretti
 
Vaccini cattaneo in senato
Vaccini cattaneo in senatoVaccini cattaneo in senato
Vaccini cattaneo in senatoCarlo Favaretti
 
Decreto vaccinazioni 2017 20commenti
Decreto vaccinazioni 2017   20commentiDecreto vaccinazioni 2017   20commenti
Decreto vaccinazioni 2017 20commentiCarlo Favaretti
 
Festival trento salute_disuguale_programma
Festival trento salute_disuguale_programmaFestival trento salute_disuguale_programma
Festival trento salute_disuguale_programmaCarlo Favaretti
 
Guida al grande romanzo epico dell’europa il foglio
Guida al grande romanzo epico dell’europa   il foglioGuida al grande romanzo epico dell’europa   il foglio
Guida al grande romanzo epico dell’europa il foglioCarlo Favaretti
 
Chi ha trasformato l’appello al popolo in una mozione di sfiducia alla democr...
Chi ha trasformato l’appello al popolo in una mozione di sfiducia alla democr...Chi ha trasformato l’appello al popolo in una mozione di sfiducia alla democr...
Chi ha trasformato l’appello al popolo in una mozione di sfiducia alla democr...Carlo Favaretti
 
Trump’s pox americana | foreign policy
Trump’s pox americana | foreign policyTrump’s pox americana | foreign policy
Trump’s pox americana | foreign policyCarlo Favaretti
 
Come distinguere l'innovazione dal nuovo? | sanità24 il sole 24 ore
Come distinguere l'innovazione dal nuovo? | sanità24   il sole 24 oreCome distinguere l'innovazione dal nuovo? | sanità24   il sole 24 ore
Come distinguere l'innovazione dal nuovo? | sanità24 il sole 24 oreCarlo Favaretti
 
Tar fvg punto nascita h latisana
Tar fvg punto nascita h latisanaTar fvg punto nascita h latisana
Tar fvg punto nascita h latisanaCarlo Favaretti
 
Raggi e il vertice farsa con beppe grillo. qualcuno chiami i carabinieri il...
Raggi e il vertice farsa con beppe grillo. qualcuno chiami i carabinieri   il...Raggi e il vertice farsa con beppe grillo. qualcuno chiami i carabinieri   il...
Raggi e il vertice farsa con beppe grillo. qualcuno chiami i carabinieri il...Carlo Favaretti
 

Mais de Carlo Favaretti (20)

Bill gates investimenti
Bill gates investimentiBill gates investimenti
Bill gates investimenti
 
Tackling wasteful-spending-on-health-highlights-revised OECD
Tackling wasteful-spending-on-health-highlights-revised OECDTackling wasteful-spending-on-health-highlights-revised OECD
Tackling wasteful-spending-on-health-highlights-revised OECD
 
Ottimismo cerasa
Ottimismo cerasaOttimismo cerasa
Ottimismo cerasa
 
Fuffa questa? svegliatevi gentiluomini garantisti! il foglio
Fuffa questa? svegliatevi gentiluomini garantisti!   il foglioFuffa questa? svegliatevi gentiluomini garantisti!   il foglio
Fuffa questa? svegliatevi gentiluomini garantisti! il foglio
 
Governo m5s lega, previsioni (con flaubert) sul governo vattelappesca - il fo...
Governo m5s lega, previsioni (con flaubert) sul governo vattelappesca - il fo...Governo m5s lega, previsioni (con flaubert) sul governo vattelappesca - il fo...
Governo m5s lega, previsioni (con flaubert) sul governo vattelappesca - il fo...
 
La spoon river della sinistra l'espresso
La spoon river della sinistra   l'espressoLa spoon river della sinistra   l'espresso
La spoon river della sinistra l'espresso
 
Tutti i problemi giornalistici e scientifici del libro sui vaccini di giulia ...
Tutti i problemi giornalistici e scientifici del libro sui vaccini di giulia ...Tutti i problemi giornalistici e scientifici del libro sui vaccini di giulia ...
Tutti i problemi giornalistici e scientifici del libro sui vaccini di giulia ...
 
Tarallo privacy
Tarallo privacyTarallo privacy
Tarallo privacy
 
I migranti di tito boeri il foglio
I migranti di tito boeri   il foglioI migranti di tito boeri   il foglio
I migranti di tito boeri il foglio
 
Vaccini cattaneo in senato
Vaccini cattaneo in senatoVaccini cattaneo in senato
Vaccini cattaneo in senato
 
Vaccini opuscolo
Vaccini opuscoloVaccini opuscolo
Vaccini opuscolo
 
Progr 10°cong sihta
Progr 10°cong sihtaProgr 10°cong sihta
Progr 10°cong sihta
 
Decreto vaccinazioni 2017 20commenti
Decreto vaccinazioni 2017   20commentiDecreto vaccinazioni 2017   20commenti
Decreto vaccinazioni 2017 20commenti
 
Festival trento salute_disuguale_programma
Festival trento salute_disuguale_programmaFestival trento salute_disuguale_programma
Festival trento salute_disuguale_programma
 
Guida al grande romanzo epico dell’europa il foglio
Guida al grande romanzo epico dell’europa   il foglioGuida al grande romanzo epico dell’europa   il foglio
Guida al grande romanzo epico dell’europa il foglio
 
Chi ha trasformato l’appello al popolo in una mozione di sfiducia alla democr...
Chi ha trasformato l’appello al popolo in una mozione di sfiducia alla democr...Chi ha trasformato l’appello al popolo in una mozione di sfiducia alla democr...
Chi ha trasformato l’appello al popolo in una mozione di sfiducia alla democr...
 
Trump’s pox americana | foreign policy
Trump’s pox americana | foreign policyTrump’s pox americana | foreign policy
Trump’s pox americana | foreign policy
 
Come distinguere l'innovazione dal nuovo? | sanità24 il sole 24 ore
Come distinguere l'innovazione dal nuovo? | sanità24   il sole 24 oreCome distinguere l'innovazione dal nuovo? | sanità24   il sole 24 ore
Come distinguere l'innovazione dal nuovo? | sanità24 il sole 24 ore
 
Tar fvg punto nascita h latisana
Tar fvg punto nascita h latisanaTar fvg punto nascita h latisana
Tar fvg punto nascita h latisana
 
Raggi e il vertice farsa con beppe grillo. qualcuno chiami i carabinieri il...
Raggi e il vertice farsa con beppe grillo. qualcuno chiami i carabinieri   il...Raggi e il vertice farsa con beppe grillo. qualcuno chiami i carabinieri   il...
Raggi e il vertice farsa con beppe grillo. qualcuno chiami i carabinieri il...
 

Último

DNA nucleotides Blast in NCBI and Phylogeny using MEGA Xi.pptx
DNA nucleotides Blast in NCBI and Phylogeny using MEGA Xi.pptxDNA nucleotides Blast in NCBI and Phylogeny using MEGA Xi.pptx
DNA nucleotides Blast in NCBI and Phylogeny using MEGA Xi.pptxMAsifAhmad
 
Unit I herbs as raw materials, biodynamic agriculture.ppt
Unit I herbs as raw materials, biodynamic agriculture.pptUnit I herbs as raw materials, biodynamic agriculture.ppt
Unit I herbs as raw materials, biodynamic agriculture.pptPradnya Wadekar
 
cerebrovasular disease(ischemic, ICH & SAH).pptx
cerebrovasular disease(ischemic, ICH & SAH).pptxcerebrovasular disease(ischemic, ICH & SAH).pptx
cerebrovasular disease(ischemic, ICH & SAH).pptxMohamed Rizk Khodair
 
Breast cancer -ONCO IN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL NURSING.pptx
Breast cancer -ONCO IN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL NURSING.pptxBreast cancer -ONCO IN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL NURSING.pptx
Breast cancer -ONCO IN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL NURSING.pptxNaveenkumar267201
 
SAI DEEPAK CASE STUDY ON CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE
SAI DEEPAK CASE STUDY ON CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASESAI DEEPAK CASE STUDY ON CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE
SAI DEEPAK CASE STUDY ON CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASESaiDeepakS1
 
Dr. Brij Rana MD - "Urgent Medical Care" FL, USA
Dr. Brij Rana MD - "Urgent Medical Care" FL, USADr. Brij Rana MD - "Urgent Medical Care" FL, USA
Dr. Brij Rana MD - "Urgent Medical Care" FL, USADr. Brij Rana MD
 
Clinical Research Informatics Year-in-Review 2024
Clinical Research Informatics Year-in-Review 2024Clinical Research Informatics Year-in-Review 2024
Clinical Research Informatics Year-in-Review 2024Peter Embi
 
HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM (intractable nausea and vomiting during pregnancy typi...
HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM (intractable nausea and vomiting during pregnancy typi...HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM (intractable nausea and vomiting during pregnancy typi...
HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM (intractable nausea and vomiting during pregnancy typi...ambreenabatool110
 
Female Reproductive Physiology Before Pregnancy
Female Reproductive Physiology Before PregnancyFemale Reproductive Physiology Before Pregnancy
Female Reproductive Physiology Before PregnancyMedicoseAcademics
 
nuclear medicine 3 marks questions and answers.pdf
nuclear medicine 3 marks questions and answers.pdfnuclear medicine 3 marks questions and answers.pdf
nuclear medicine 3 marks questions and answers.pdfGanesan Yogananthem
 
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE, RADIATIONBIOLOGY& RADIATION HAZARD...
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE, RADIATIONBIOLOGY& RADIATION HAZARD...QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE, RADIATIONBIOLOGY& RADIATION HAZARD...
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE, RADIATIONBIOLOGY& RADIATION HAZARD...Ganesan Yogananthem
 
Physiotherapy Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Physiotherapy Management of Rheumatoid ArthritisPhysiotherapy Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Physiotherapy Management of Rheumatoid ArthritisNilofarRasheed1
 
Is It Time To Consider A Hearing Aid Look For These Signs
Is It Time To Consider A Hearing Aid Look For These SignsIs It Time To Consider A Hearing Aid Look For These Signs
Is It Time To Consider A Hearing Aid Look For These SignsSoundak
 
Etiology and neurobiology of obsessive compulsive disorder
Etiology and neurobiology of obsessive compulsive disorderEtiology and neurobiology of obsessive compulsive disorder
Etiology and neurobiology of obsessive compulsive disorderSimranSandhu673667
 
PTH & Calcitonin for MBBS, BDS, Lab. Med..pptx
PTH & Calcitonin for MBBS, BDS, Lab. Med..pptxPTH & Calcitonin for MBBS, BDS, Lab. Med..pptx
PTH & Calcitonin for MBBS, BDS, Lab. Med..pptxRajendra Dev Bhatt
 
Introduction to basic Molecular Biology.pptx
Introduction to basic Molecular Biology.pptxIntroduction to basic Molecular Biology.pptx
Introduction to basic Molecular Biology.pptxseeratefatima
 
Trustworthiness of AI based predictions Aachen 2024
Trustworthiness of AI based predictions Aachen 2024Trustworthiness of AI based predictions Aachen 2024
Trustworthiness of AI based predictions Aachen 2024EwoutSteyerberg1
 

Último (20)

DNA nucleotides Blast in NCBI and Phylogeny using MEGA Xi.pptx
DNA nucleotides Blast in NCBI and Phylogeny using MEGA Xi.pptxDNA nucleotides Blast in NCBI and Phylogeny using MEGA Xi.pptx
DNA nucleotides Blast in NCBI and Phylogeny using MEGA Xi.pptx
 
Unit I herbs as raw materials, biodynamic agriculture.ppt
Unit I herbs as raw materials, biodynamic agriculture.pptUnit I herbs as raw materials, biodynamic agriculture.ppt
Unit I herbs as raw materials, biodynamic agriculture.ppt
 
cerebrovasular disease(ischemic, ICH & SAH).pptx
cerebrovasular disease(ischemic, ICH & SAH).pptxcerebrovasular disease(ischemic, ICH & SAH).pptx
cerebrovasular disease(ischemic, ICH & SAH).pptx
 
Breast cancer -ONCO IN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL NURSING.pptx
Breast cancer -ONCO IN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL NURSING.pptxBreast cancer -ONCO IN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL NURSING.pptx
Breast cancer -ONCO IN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL NURSING.pptx
 
Black Spots on Legs: Symptoms, Causes and Treatment.pptx
Black Spots on Legs: Symptoms, Causes and Treatment.pptxBlack Spots on Legs: Symptoms, Causes and Treatment.pptx
Black Spots on Legs: Symptoms, Causes and Treatment.pptx
 
SAI DEEPAK CASE STUDY ON CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE
SAI DEEPAK CASE STUDY ON CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASESAI DEEPAK CASE STUDY ON CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE
SAI DEEPAK CASE STUDY ON CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE
 
Conversations With Peers About T2DM: Best Practices for Optimizing Treatment ...
Conversations With Peers About T2DM: Best Practices for Optimizing Treatment ...Conversations With Peers About T2DM: Best Practices for Optimizing Treatment ...
Conversations With Peers About T2DM: Best Practices for Optimizing Treatment ...
 
Dr. Brij Rana MD - "Urgent Medical Care" FL, USA
Dr. Brij Rana MD - "Urgent Medical Care" FL, USADr. Brij Rana MD - "Urgent Medical Care" FL, USA
Dr. Brij Rana MD - "Urgent Medical Care" FL, USA
 
Clinical Research Informatics Year-in-Review 2024
Clinical Research Informatics Year-in-Review 2024Clinical Research Informatics Year-in-Review 2024
Clinical Research Informatics Year-in-Review 2024
 
HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM (intractable nausea and vomiting during pregnancy typi...
HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM (intractable nausea and vomiting during pregnancy typi...HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM (intractable nausea and vomiting during pregnancy typi...
HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM (intractable nausea and vomiting during pregnancy typi...
 
Female Reproductive Physiology Before Pregnancy
Female Reproductive Physiology Before PregnancyFemale Reproductive Physiology Before Pregnancy
Female Reproductive Physiology Before Pregnancy
 
nuclear medicine 3 marks questions and answers.pdf
nuclear medicine 3 marks questions and answers.pdfnuclear medicine 3 marks questions and answers.pdf
nuclear medicine 3 marks questions and answers.pdf
 
Cone beam CT: concepts and applications.pptx
Cone beam CT: concepts and applications.pptxCone beam CT: concepts and applications.pptx
Cone beam CT: concepts and applications.pptx
 
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE, RADIATIONBIOLOGY& RADIATION HAZARD...
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE, RADIATIONBIOLOGY& RADIATION HAZARD...QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE, RADIATIONBIOLOGY& RADIATION HAZARD...
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE, RADIATIONBIOLOGY& RADIATION HAZARD...
 
Physiotherapy Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Physiotherapy Management of Rheumatoid ArthritisPhysiotherapy Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Physiotherapy Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis
 
Is It Time To Consider A Hearing Aid Look For These Signs
Is It Time To Consider A Hearing Aid Look For These SignsIs It Time To Consider A Hearing Aid Look For These Signs
Is It Time To Consider A Hearing Aid Look For These Signs
 
Etiology and neurobiology of obsessive compulsive disorder
Etiology and neurobiology of obsessive compulsive disorderEtiology and neurobiology of obsessive compulsive disorder
Etiology and neurobiology of obsessive compulsive disorder
 
PTH & Calcitonin for MBBS, BDS, Lab. Med..pptx
PTH & Calcitonin for MBBS, BDS, Lab. Med..pptxPTH & Calcitonin for MBBS, BDS, Lab. Med..pptx
PTH & Calcitonin for MBBS, BDS, Lab. Med..pptx
 
Introduction to basic Molecular Biology.pptx
Introduction to basic Molecular Biology.pptxIntroduction to basic Molecular Biology.pptx
Introduction to basic Molecular Biology.pptx
 
Trustworthiness of AI based predictions Aachen 2024
Trustworthiness of AI based predictions Aachen 2024Trustworthiness of AI based predictions Aachen 2024
Trustworthiness of AI based predictions Aachen 2024
 

How doctors could rescue health care by arnold relman | the new york review of books

  • 1. How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books 21/10/11 21:15 Font Size: A A A How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care OCTOBER 27, 2011 Arnold Relman Ed Kashi/VII A nurse consulting a doctor via Mr. Rounder the Robot, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, 2005 1. The US is facing a major crisis in the cost of health care. Corrected for inflation, health expenditures in the public sector are nearly doubling each decade, and those in the private sector are increasing even more rapidly. According to virtually all economists, this financial burden, which is now consuming about 17 percent of our entire economic output (far more than in any other country), cannot be sustained much longer. The federal share, including payments for Medicare and Medicaid, was 23 percent of the national budget in 2009 and is a prime cause of the deficit. 1 There is no current prospect of raising taxes. If the federal long-term debt is to be reduced, government health expenditures on Medicare and Medicaid must be controlled. However, there is no agreement in Washington on how http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true Pagina 1 di 13
  • 2. How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books 21/10/11 21:15 that can or should be done. Both parties claim to have the answer but, as I will make clear, no initiatives proposed by either party have much chance of significantly slowing the rise in federal health costs without reducing access to needed services. Major reform will be required, but that is not even under consideration. In any case, health legislation is currently stalled by a bitter political deadlock. No initiatives to improve health care will come out of Congress until after the 2012 elections and, unless the results are unexpectedly decisive, probably not even then. Still, as I will explain here, there is a chance that new developments in the way physicians are organizing themselves to deliver care might improve the currently dismal prospects for action on major reform and cost control. 2. In his September 8 address to Congress, the President spoke of the urgent need to control the costs of Medicare. To do this he is relying principally on the Affordable Care Act, passed by Democrats in March 2010. The Act expands insurance coverage but, as already explained in these pages, 2 it is not likely to slow the rise of costs significantly. Republicans in Congress are seeking to stop it from being implemented and their potential candidates for president are demanding its repeal, while state governments that are controlled by Republicans are challenging its constitutionality in federal courts. They question the Act’s mandate that all citizens not covered by public or private insurance plans be required to purchase private insurance or incur a tax penalty. The Republican legal challenge has so far received a divided reception in lower courts and will probably reach the Supreme Court next year. The mandate is a critical part of the Act because private insurers will not offer coverage at affordable prices to all applicants, as the Act assumes, unless everyone—young and healthy included—is required to be insured. Whatever the Court’s decision, it will not have much effect on health costs because the law does very little or nothing to address some of the most important causes of the high cost of care and its rapid inflation. 3 First, the Act does not replace—but expands—the investor-owned private health insurance industry. According to the actuary for the government’s Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), this industry’s overhead and profits currently add over $152 billion to the cost of care. 4 Second, the Act does not change the method of payment for most medical http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true Pagina 2 di 13
  • 3. How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books 21/10/11 21:15 care, which is based on fees for each procedure and therefore encourages specialists to use expensive procedures excessively, while giving all physicians strong financial incentives to provide more services than needed. Third, it does nothing to change the current fragmentation of medical care. This allows specialists to practice in isolation without restraints on cost, causes duplication and disorganization of services, and discourages the use of primary care physicians. The latter are essential to cost-effective care because they help patients avoid unnecessary, expensive procedures. But with specialists earning much higher incomes per unit of working time, primary care doctors are disappearing. The Act addresses this problem, but only by providing minimal financial incentives to primary care doctors; they are unlikely to make much difference. In the absence of effective general solutions for these causes of rising costs, there is little chance that the Act will “bend the curve” of medical inflation as Democrats hope. The law does, however, propose to cover the cost of adding millions of beneficiaries to Medicaid and to private plans over ten years. It does this by cutting payments to the private “Medicare Advantage” plans now chosen by some 12 million Medicare beneficiaries, and by eliminating tax exemptions for expensive insurance coverage offered by employers to favored employees. Apart from two ill-conceived and probably unworkable exceptions, the Act offers no other broad initiatives directly aimed at reducing costs. The first exception, in Section 3022 of the Act, proposes to share any Medicare savings with so-called accountable care organizations (ACOs). ACOs are defined as federally certified multispecialty groups of physicians that collaborate with one or more hospitals and contract with Medicare to provide comprehensive care to a designated group of patients on a fee-for- service basis. ACOs would in principle have incentives to control costs because the government would give them a share of any savings they produced by using fewer resources in delivering good care. But the 126 pages of regulations proposed to govern this program, published by the Department of Health and Human Services on April 7, 2011, 5 threaten to undermine it. The regulations were considered so onerous and impractical, and the benefits to participating ACOs so dubious, that almost all multispecialty medical groups have indicated they would not participate. 6 http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true Pagina 3 di 13
  • 4. How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books 21/10/11 21:15 Even if the regulations are substantially modified before they are fully adopted, the CMS, which would administer the program, probably could not handle the extra work required to manage more than a relatively small number of participating ACOs. This program is therefore not likely to have much effect on health care costs. Section 3403 of the Act is often cited as a powerful tool for controlling costs, but there is much reason to be skeptical. It establishes an Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), a presidentially appointed independent committee of fifteen full-time members. If government spending rises too rapidly, the IPAB must offer proposals for cost control, and Congress must act on them or enact its own measures for equivalent savings. However, the law stipulates that the IPAB cannot reduce Medicare benefits or increase Medicare premiums, and it defers any proposed reductions in payments to hospitals for a few years. The IPAB would thus be limited to suggesting cuts in payments to physicians, payments for some ambulatory services such as emergency room visits, and payments for Medicare Advantage plans and Medicare Part D prescription drugs. Unless the IPAB were to recommend some limitation to their total income, physicians could easily respond to reduced fee schedules by providing more services, such as performing more diagnostic tests. Physicians’ average incomes have not kept pace with the rising costs of managing an office, and there is widespread unhappiness among the profession over the threat of cuts in payment that have been mandated by past legislation. Some physicians are now refusing to see new Medicare patients for this reason, so I doubt there would be support in Congress for much further reduction in fee schedules. Moreover, payments to physicians account for only about a fifth of total health expenditures. The other four fifths consist largely of costs of hospital and nursing home care as well as payments for drugs and other medical products, and the overhead costs of private insurers. A realistic reduction of payments to doctors could at most save one or two percent of total costs, and wouldn’t necessarily slow inflation. The other cost-saving options left open to the IPAB are also limited in scope and would have relatively little effect on “bending the curve.” Furthermore, and most importantly, there will probably be fierce Republican opposition in Congress to IPAB appointments and funding, which will hamstring its function. The IPAB’s prospects for http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true Pagina 4 di 13
  • 5. How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books 21/10/11 21:15 success are therefore dim. 3. Republicans in Congress have pretty much limited their health policy to an unyielding opposition to “Obamacare,” to calls for reform of malpractice litigation, and to their traditional reliance on “market forces.” Their latest initiative is the proposal by Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin to privatize Medicare and change federal support of Medicaid by substituting fixed grants for its current open-ended commitment to paying a large share of costs to the states. Under his proposal the Medicare system covering most of the medical costs of elderly citizens would be gradually replaced by a federal voucher system. Starting in 2022 each new Medicare beneficiary would choose a private insurance plan and the government would give participants in the plan a voucher to help pay for coverage. The voucher would start at $8,000, which would grow only according to the Consumer Price Index, but with some undefined adjustment for people who are older and sicker. However, actuarial experts predict a near doubling of total Medicare costs within a decade; so Ryan’s proposed vouchers would fall far behind actual costs, and beneficiaries would have an increasing financial burden. The Ryan plan reduces federal outlays for Medicare by shifting costs to patients. It has been passed by the Republican majority in the House, but not by the Senate, and the President strongly opposes it. Defending Ryan’s plan, Republicans say that under current policies Medicare will soon be bankrupt. They are correct that rising Medicare costs are unsustainable, but the fact remains that the Ryan voucher plan puts an intolerable burden on the elderly and would undoubtedly reduce their access to needed care. We can predict, for example, that patients would make fewer visits to physicians for checkups and reduce their compliance with expensive drug regimens. As for Ryan’s proposal to reduce Medicaid outlays by making fixed grants to states, the states would have considerable discretion in spending these grants, and their deficits would almost certainly force them to curtail Medicaid services in order to meet other budgetary needs. The grant idea, although favored by some state governors, has provoked wide opposition http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true Pagina 5 di 13
  • 6. How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books 21/10/11 21:15 because it threatens the medical services needed by low-income citizens, and because Medicaid money now also supports nursing home care for the elderly. 4. If neither party is proposing effective solutions to the cost crisis, and political deadlock in Washington is preventing the consideration of new ideas, are we doomed to witness a slowly collapsing health care system that eventually will provide adequate care only to those who can afford to pay? In his latest book on health care, 7 the Princeton sociologist Paul Starr, who worked on the ill-fated Clinton Health Security Plan, despairs of any political action that could bring about major reform. However, a new movement in the medical profession might help to start such reform by reconfiguring the way medicine will be practiced. Traditionally, physicians have practiced either alone or in small partnerships with a single specialty, such as cardiology. Now a big shift to large groups containing many specialties is taking place. These multispecialty practices vary in size, but include physicians in almost all fields. Primary care physicians usually make up almost half the medical staff. They counsel patients and coordinate care by the specialists. Groups usually share common facilities, medical records, scheduling, and billing, and their physicians cooperate in the care of patients. Many multispecialty groups pay doctors at least in part with base salaries, with the rest of their compensation derived from each physician’s collected fees. Only a few pay entirely by salary, but that may change. Most groups are owned by physicians, but many are now being organized and managed by hospitals. Well-established large groups owned by physicians include the Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Permanente Medical Group, Intermountain Healthcare, Scott & White, Marshfield Clinic, Geisinger Health System, Lahey Clinic, and Harvard Vanguard. Many smaller physician-owned groups now exist throughout the country (though there are only a few in the Southeast), and their number is growing rapidly. So are groups owned by hospitals, including academic medical centers as well as large community hospitals. An unknown, but probably substantial, proportion of these groups are not for profit; i.e., they have no investors and use any net income to maintain and improve facilities and services. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true Pagina 6 di 13
  • 7. How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books 21/10/11 21:15 The American Medical Group Association (AMGA) is the trade organization that represents most multispecialty physician-owned groups. The American Hospital Association (AHA) is the trade organization for almost all general hospitals. In recent communications with senior officials at the AMGA and the AHA, I learned that membership in the AMGA now stands at about four hundred groups, the highest ever, and is increasing at an unprecedented rate of about 10 percent annually. These four hundred multispecialty groups employ about 117,000 full-time medical doctors, but since many of their physicians work less than full-time, the total number of doctors now employed by such groups is probably close to 140,000, not counting the unknown number in physician-owned groups that are not members of the AMGA. The AHA says that a 2010 survey of its member hospitals reveals that they employed roughly 120,000 practicing physicians, but the survey did not disclose how many were in multispecialty group practices. Allowing for this incomplete reporting, the total number of physicians now practicing in multispecialty groups could be close to 200,000, or about a quarter of all practicing physicians, and this number is increasing rapidly. There are many reasons for this change. Young doctors now finish their training with substantial debt, often in the range of $150,000 or more. The prospect of assuming even more debt to start their own practice is daunting. Joining a multispecialty group means less financial risk and provides ready- made facilities and a staff to schedule patients and bill for services. Groups usually offer an income fully competitive with that to be expected in independent private practice. They often pay better fringe benefits than solo practitioners could provide for themselves. Half of all medical students are now women, and soon they will represent nearly half of all practicing physicians. Women are more likely than men to choose some type of primary care practice, and I and others have found that many of them particularly appreciate the opportunity afforded by group practice to share responsibilities and to limit their working time. Many young male physicians are also glad to be working in a less competitive and more collegial environment, with opportunities to choose limited working hours. In short, physicians are increasingly looking for arrangements that allow http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true Pagina 7 di 13
  • 8. How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books 21/10/11 21:15 them to focus more on the practice of medicine and less on managing a business. They also want at least a little more time for personal and family life. Practice in multispecialty groups is the obvious answer. Single-specialty groups offer some similar advantages, but are not as attractive. They are smaller, have fewer resources, and will not be able to adapt as well to the new payment methods that government and private payers intend to employ. Meanwhile, evidence has been accumulating that organized care by multi- specialty groups provides good medical service and has the potential of saving much money. 8 This is because, as most clearly shown by John Wennberg and his colleagues at Dartmouth, 9 much of the care prescribed and provided by independent specialists is unnecessary. Physician-owned not-for-profit groups, particularly those that pay their doctors at least partly by salaries, are not as likely to provide unnecessary services or to recommend hospitalization when it is optional. Their physicians have few financial incentives to do so, and the services of their specialists are coordinated with their primary care doctors, who usually recommend the simplest and least expensive choices consistent with good medical care. However, today’s competitive health care market, with its private health insurance companies and fee-for-service payment system, severely limits the potential cost savings of a delivery system based on not-for-profit group practice. Private insurers contribute to high costs not only because of their profits and overhead, as already noted, but because doctors and hospitals have to pay the considerable costs of billing the insurance companies and collecting money from them. I favor a much less expensive single public payer system supported by a universal, progressive, designated health care tax. Fee-for-service payment gives doctors incentives to provide more services than needed and allows for fraudulent billing. It should be replaced by an advance payment to physicians for comprehensive care on a per capita basis. To receive such payment, group practices would have to reimburse their physicians largely by salary. Regulations would require open enrollment of patients; to limit the risk of fixed payment for comprehensive care, groups would need public reinsurance or other financial guarantee to protect against the possibility that some patients might need expensive services. There is much reason to believe that such a reformed system could deliver http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true Pagina 8 di 13
  • 9. How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books 21/10/11 21:15 good care for all at considerably less cost and could also control cost inflation 10 —although such a system does not have the remotest chance of being legislated by our national government anytime soon. But what if, as seems likely, the rapid trend toward group practice that I have described were to continue, and almost all medical care were ultimately to be provided through multispecialty group practices? Despite the limitations imposed by the existing health care market, the advantages of organized care might become obvious not only to patients but to business employers and even to legislators and policymakers in Washington. The question would then arise: If restructuring the delivery of medical care is so helpful, why not reform the insurance and payment of care as well? Supported by most of the medical profession and by most voters, major reform might finally be seriously discussed. It might become easier to pass legislation that created a system based on a tax-supported single-payer system, with prepaid comprehensive care for all. Obviously, there is no guarantee this would happen. Indeed, the odds would still be against it. But if most physicians were to be employed in multispecialty groups, the growing number of practitioners now supporting major reform would probably become a strong majority. This could well change the climate of opinion enough to influence legislation. Dr. Francis J. Crosson, former executive director of the Kaiser-Permanente physicians’ organization and a prominent advocate for physician-managed groups becoming federally certified ACOs, believes that they will be essential for the future control of health costs. 11 But unlike the broad reforms I favor, in the system he envisions these group practices would function in a competitive marketplace, in which public and private insurers would offer them financial incentives to improve care, and market forces would be expected to control prices. However, I am convinced that good affordable universal care will require major reform of all parts of the system because market forces and the current system have clearly encouraged excessive medical treatment and diagnostic testing. Insurance coverage will need to be replaced by tax-supported universal access to medical care, which should change from a competitive market to a not-for-profit social service. 12 Hospitals, as we have seen, are now hiring more physicians to work in groups. As hospital employees, these physicians inevitably feel pressure to http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true Pagina 9 di 13
  • 10. How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books 21/10/11 21:15 protect their employers’ income by filling beds and using hospital facilities for tests and procedures. They are less likely to control costs than physicians in independent not-for-profit groups. It is not yet clear which type of group will dominate, but those owned by physicians would probably be more supportive of reform. The greatest resistance to reform would come from the private insurance industry. But with the savings that a reformed health system would generate, it should be possible for whatever agency collects the health care tax to buy out the industry’s investors. Some current employees of insurance companies might be usefully employed in a new single-payer system. Moreover, it seems likely that the jobs lost in health insurance companies would be offset by new jobs created through the expansion of an economy relieved of unsustainable health costs. I do not underestimate the complexity of the task or the strength of opposition to reform by vested interests, and by conservatives who rail against a “government takeover” of health care. Reform could be delayed for years, or indefinitely. However, the status quo will soon no longer be tenable because of rising costs. New thinking about major reform and private health insurance will be necessary. Private investor-owned health insurance appeared quite suddenly in the final few decades of the last century, reaping the profits from the health coverage that employers were offering to their employees. But except for a brief and unpopular era of cost control by “managed care” in the 1990s, the private insurance industry has not contributed anything to the health care system nearly comparable in value to the costs it has added. In some European countries, private insurance companies are an integral part of popular and less expensive health care systems, but they are usually not-for-profit and are closely regulated by government. In Switzerland, for example, the government mandates universal not-for-profit private insurance coverage for most medical services; it also requires uniform benefits and controls costs by regulating insurance premiums and the fees paid to physicians. The government also owns most of the major hospitals. In view of our distinctive political and economic traditions, and cultural diversity, we could not easily adopt this or any other foreign system. We will have to find our own health care solutions. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true Pagina 10 di 13
  • 11. How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books 21/10/11 21:15 Health reform might begin in the states. Vermont has recently approved a single-payer system that includes a public board to develop a global health budget and new reimbursement methods to replace fee-for-service payment. The board will help physicians to form multispecialty groups that can accept prior payments for comprehensive care of patients. Many other details remain to be worked out. Federal permission for the state to pool all government health care funds will be needed before the plan can become operative, which is estimated for 2017. 13 Similar initiatives may be introduced in other states; if successful, state plans would encourage Congress to enact national reforms. 5. The net effect of the reformed system I have described here on the government’s costs can only be guessed at, but savings would be very large. Any initial increases in expenditures owing to expanded coverage would certainly be more than balanced by savings later on. However, government would hold the ultimate cost-controlling weapon because it would determine the rates at which it reimbursed groups for prepaid, comprehensive care, and would thereby have full control of health care expenditures. If everyone (including politicians and government officials) were in the system, there would be little chance that the government would underfund it, or allow its services to deteriorate. Such reforms are the best—perhaps the only—hope of preserving the benefits of Medicare and Medicaid and achieving affordable universal access to care. In today’s political climate these reforms have no chance, but this could change if physicians continue to join groups and transform the organization of medical care. If encouraged by public opinion and by physicians, the members of Congress might see the clear advantages of the group practice model. They might then legislate the broad reforms in insurance and payment that would make this model much more effective. If that were to happen, the medical profession would have made an important, although unplanned, contribution to the rescue of the US health care system. 1. 1 Lisa Potetz and Juliette Cubanski, A Primer on Medicare Financing , Henry http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true Pagina 11 di 13
  • 12. How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books 21/10/11 21:15 Kaiser Family Foundation, July 2009, Exhibit 2. ↩ 2. 2 Jonathan Oberlander and Theodore R. Marmor, "The Health Bill Explained at Last," The New York Review , August 19, 2010. ↩ 3. 3 Arnold Relman, "Health Care: The Disquieting Truth," The New York Review , September 30, 2010. ↩ 4. 4 Sean P. Keehan et al., "National Health Spending Projections Through 2020: Economic Recovery and Reform Drive Faster Spending Growth," HealthAffairs , Vol. 30, No. 8 (August 2011). ↩ 5. 5 Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Register , Part II, Vol. 76, No. 67 (April 7, 2011). ↩ 6. 6 Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, "Medical Group Pans Key Element of Obama Health Plan," The Boston Globe , May 12, 2011. ↩ 7. 7 Remedy and Reaction: The Peculiar American Struggle Over Health Care Reform (Yale University Press, 2011.) ↩ 8. 8 Kenneth H. Chuang, Harold S. Luft, and R. Adams Dudley, "The Clinical and Economic Performance of Prepaid Group Practice," Toward a 21st Century Health System , edited by Alain C. Enthoven and Laura A. Tollen (Jossey-Bass, 2004); and Brent C. James and Lucy A. Savitz, "How Intermountain Trimmed Health Care Costs Through Robust Quality Improvement Efforts," HealthAffairs , Vol. 30, No. 6 (June 2011). ↩ 9. 9 John E. Wennberg, Tracking Medicine: A Researcher's Quest to Understand Health Care (Oxford University Press, 2010). ↩ 10. 10 http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true Pagina 12 di 13
  • 13. How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care by Arnold Relman | The New York Review of Books 21/10/11 21:15 Arnold Relman, A Second Opinion: Rescuing America's Health Care (PublicAffairs, 2010). ↩ 11. 11 Francis J. Crosson, "The Accountable Care Organization: Whatever Its Growing Pains, the Concept Is Too Vitally Important to Fail," HealthAffairs , Vol. 30, No. 7 (July 2011). ↩ 12. 12 Relman, A Second Opinion . ↩ 13. 13 Anya Rader Wallack, "Single Payer Ahead—Cost Control and the Evolving Vermont Model," The New England Journal of Medicine , Vol. 365 (August 18, 2011). ↩ Copyright © 1963-2011 NYREV, Inc. All rights reserved. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/how-doctors-could-rescue-health-care/?pagination=false&printpage=true Pagina 13 di 13