18. Adaptive Target Value Transformation Observations: 1. Relevance gain (DCG5 ~ 2%) is visible. 2. Regularization is needed. 3. Different query types gain differently from aTVT.
19.
20.
21.
22. Multi-Language MLR Distribution of Text Score Legend: JP, CN, DE, UK, KR Perf+Excellent urls Bad urls
23. Multi-Language MLR Distribution of Spam Score Legend: JP, CN, DE, UK, KR Perf+Excellent urls Bad urls JP, KR similar DE, UK similar
24. Multi-Language MLR Training and Testing on Different Languages Train Language Test Language % DCG improvement over base function 7.47 2.50 0.29 -3.53 1.91 CN 1.30 4.48 -0.30 -3.79 -1.25 JP 3.86 4.49 5.69 -0.55 1.50 KR 3.94 6.05 6.25 13.1 6.96 DE 0.32 2.96 -0.21 2.29 6.22 UK CN JP KR DE UK
25.
26.
27.
28. Multi-Language MLR Query Region Feature: Experiment results % DCG-5 improvement over base function 6.83% 5.79% KR 10.51% 9.86% DE 5.92% 4.34% UK 7.02% 6.24% CN 3.53% 3.07% JP Combined Model With Query Region Feature Combined Model Language
29. Multi-Language MLR Query Region Feature: Experiment results CJK and UK,DE Models All models include query region feature 6.83% 10.51% 5.92% 7.02% 3.53% All Language Model 6.14% 7.17% 4.39% CJK Model KR 12.5% DE 5.93% UK CN JP UK, DE Model Test Language
41. Multi-Language MLR Evaluation of Language Neutral Queries on CN-simplified dataset (2,753 queries). 5.83 5.85 Japanese 5.50(+6%) 5.19 Korean 5.79(+2.7%) dcg5 = 5.64 CN-Traditional Language-Neutral queries only (top ~500 queries ) All the queries