Presentation shared at Governors State University on June 6, 2011. Examines how participating in digital media compelled me to transform my online and face to face classes through podcasts, VoiceThreads, a collaborative wiki activity, and more.
Faculty Profile prashantha K EEE dept Sri Sairam college of Engineering
Teaching in the Age of Participation: Governors State University
1. Teaching in the
Age of Participation
Michelle Pacansky-Brock
@brocansky
image credit: Laurie Burruss
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
2. ONLINE LEARNING IS A
DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION
“At first [online learning] was most often used for
distance learning. Increasingly, however, online learning
is being implemented in brick-and-mortar schools in
what is called blended learning; the content is
becoming more and more robust for individual learners
so that it motivates students to engage in deeper
learning, and the communication technology is
enhancing the ability of teachers and students to
interact.” (emphasis added)
Clayton M. Christensen,
Professor, Harvard Business School
Author of Disrupting Class
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
3. HOW DO
WE GET THERE?
by Asma on Flickr
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
10. image credit: John Scott Haydon
•500 million users (70% outside the US)
• 250 million users access FB through mobile
years old
• used by 95% of 18-24 college students in US (70% daily)*
*Source: Smith and Caruso. ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and IT, 2010.
http://www.educause.edu/Resources/ECARStudyofUndergraduateStuden/217333
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
11. •More video uploaded in 60 days than created by the 3
major US TV networks in 60 years.
years old
•More than 50% of videos are rated by other users.
•2010: 700 billion playbacks
•YouTube mobile: 100 million views per day
Source: YouTube, http://www.youtube.com/t/press_statistics
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
12. •Average of 450,000 new accounts per day
•One billion tweets sent per week
years in last year
•Twitter mobile: 182% increase
old
Source: Twitter, http://blog.twitter.com/2011/03/numbers.html
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
13. “THE ERA OF PARTICIPATION”
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
14. “THE ERA OF PARTICIPATION”
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
15. Visualization of Tweets including #Jan25
sent on: Feb 11, 2011
by André Panisson using Gephi
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
16. PARTICIPATORY LEARNING IS
COMMONPLACE
“Since the current generation of
college students has no memory of
the historical moment before the
advent of the Internet, we are
suggesting that participatory learning
as a practice is no longer exotic or
new but a commonplace way of
socializing and learning. For many, it
seems entirely unremarkable.”
The Future of Thinking: Learning Institutions in a Digital Age by Cathy N. Davidson and David Theo Goldberg with
Zoë Marie Jones. From the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning.
MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2009.
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
22. O n l i n e C l a s s Tr a n s fo r m a t i o n
“The best part of the class was seeing your face
pop up and start speaking to us each week.”
-Online Student
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
23. Lectures: Learning with a Choice
O n l i n e C l a s s Tr a n s fo r m a t i o n
listen or read
(pause, rewind, replay)
Taminator on Flickr
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
24. O n l i n e C l a s s Tr a n s fo r m a t i o n
peer-to-peer, participatory learning
web-based application
no cost to student
provides conversations around media
comments in voice, video or text
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
25. O n l i n e C l a s s Tr a n s fo r m a t i o n
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
26. Audio & Video Feedback
Prompt: Select one image and analyze its FORM or its CONTENT.
O n l i n e C l a s s Tr a n s fo r m a t i o n
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
28. Instruction Paradigm Learning Paradigm
Transfer knowledge from Elicit students’ discovery and
faculty to students construction of knowledge
Identify your Achieve specified learning results
Cover material paradigm.
Faculty role is designer of learning
Faculty role is “lecturer”
methods and environments
Achieve access for diverse Achieve learning success for
student groups diverse student groups
Barr & Tagg, From Teaching to Learning: A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education, Change,
Nov/Dec 1995, 13-25. Table graphic is an adapted from the work of Jim Julius.
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
30. creating
g
nin
ear
evaluating Increase F2F
L
ep time spent
De
on fostering
analyzing these skills.
applying
ion
understanding Reduce F2F
zat
time spent
mori
on fostering
remembering
Me
these skills.
te
Ro
Cognitive Domain
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
36. pre- and post-class
Online Formative Assessments
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
37. pre-class
Online Formative Assessments
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
38. post-class
Online Formative Assessments
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
39. F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
Course Outcome:
Identify significant achievements
made by women artists.
My Problem: How can I encourage
students to construct this knowledge
together, rather than have tell them?
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
40. The Wiki Challenge:
A creative, fun activity fostering collaborative
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
construction of information
1. In class, one student “contestant” is assigned to each artist
covered in the current learning unit.
2. In class, each “contestant” leads a small group through
information discovery, as they use books and smartphones to
identify key ideas about the artist’s life and accomplishments.
3. After class, each “contestant” writes summary of the key ideas
on their respective wiki page (which is set up by the professor).
4. In next class, each “contestant” presents their page to the
class. Professor approves or suggests revisions.
5. At end of term, the professor uses the content on the wiki
create the exam. Students study the student-generated wiki.
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
45. USE THEM!
•“Call a Friend” Surveys
Flickr
•Poll Everywhere
r on
(free, texting turns phones into clickers)
Ferre
Jofre
• Have students participate in a
e by
imag
Twitter backchannel.
cloud
• Send scheduled tweets during class
(ask questions for students to reply to)
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
46. Student Comments:
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
evidence of deep learning
“The material presented in this class
prompted me to evaluate my experiences as
a female in terms of my connections to
females who have lived before me, females
now and those who will soon arrive on the
scene.”
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
47. Student Comments:
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
evidence of deep learning
“[The class] made me look at the images I
see every day in a new way. I also liked the
way that the class was set up. I think that
more classes should be taught this way.”
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
48. Student Comments:
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
evidence of deep learning
“I really enjoyed the class and I understood
the content a lot better than I would have in
just a traditional classroom setting.”
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
49. Student Comments:
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
evidence of deep learning
“I learned more than I ever thought I
would. ... I will take some of the lessons I
learned here with me for the rest of my life.”
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
50. Student Comments:
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
evidence of deep learning
“I have to admit it did take a little getting use
to, and did require you to become a little
more organized, BUT the richness in the
information was a wonderful trade off. I feel
as though I walked through the 1920's in
Paris and was able to breathe in the
atmosphere...”
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
51. Student Comments:
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
evidence of deep learning
“In traditional lecture classes you feel like
you are being forcefed the information, but
in this class you felt like you were living the
history in each of the learning units and
truly connecting to the material.”
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
52. F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
STUDENT SURVEY
RESULTS
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
53. HAVING THE OPTION TO READ OR LISTEN TO A
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
LECTURE INCREASED MY ABILITY TO ACHIEVE THE
LEARNING OBJECTIVES.
92.5% = strongly agreed/agreed
(Pacansky-Brock, 2008)
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
54. WHEN GIVEN THE OPTION TO READ OR LISTEN TO
A LECTURE, WHICH OPTION DID YOU CHOOSE?
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
0.500
40%
0.375
30%
0.250
15%
15% 0.125
read
listened
both 0
sometimes
read, sometimes neither
listened (Pacansky-Brock, 2008)
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
55. WHY DID YOU CHOOSE THIS
LECTURE FORMAT?
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
0.700
67%
0.525
0.350
22% 0.175
Meets
my learning Most 11% 0
style convenient It’s what I’m
for me used to Didn’t want
doing to deal with
more
technology
(Pacansky-Brock, 2008)
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
56. BY COMPLETING THE LECTURES OUTSIDE THE
CLASSROOM, THE TIME WE SPENT IN CLASS WAS
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
MORE RELEVANT TO MY OWN LEARNING.
0.500
41% 40% 0.375
0.250
15% 0.125
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral 4% 0
Disagree 81% = strongly
Strongly Disagree agree/agree
(Pacansky-Brock, 2008)
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
57. F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
Effect on Success and
Retention?
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
58. 10% INCREASE IN SUCCESS
12% INCREASE IN RETENTION
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
0.900
90%
83%
83% “flipped” classroom
0.675
67% traditional classroom
0.450
0.225 Success: # enrolled at census
divided by the number of students
who end with an A, B, or C
Success 0
Retention Retention: # enrolled at census
divided by the number enrolled at
end of term.
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
59. THE VARIETY OF LEARNING MATERIALS PLAYED
A ROLE IN HELPING ME REACH THE COURSE
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
LEARNING OBJECTIVES.
0.900
0.675
0.450
0.225
Strongly Agree
Agree 0
Neutral
Disagree
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
60. THIS CLASS HELPED ME UNDERSTAND
HOW I LEARN BEST.
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
81% = strongly
agreed/agreed
0.500
41% 40% 0.375
0.250
0.125
15%
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral 0
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
61. Student Interview
F2F Class Tr ansfor mation
Listen to the full 20-minute interview at:
http://bit.ly/mpbshare
Tuesday, June 7, 2011