SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 105
Baixar para ler offline
Election 2012
Administrative Overview for BOCC
    Committee of the Whole




                        Brian D. Newby
                        Election Commissioner
                        Johnson County, Kansas
                        www.jocoelection.org
                        http://my.jocopolo.com
                        September 8, 2011
Session Objectives
 Today’s meeting is intended to:
 • Provide a general update to issues impacting Johnson County
   elections.
 • Highlight specific administrative areas of note for 2012.
 • Assess readiness.
 • Be interactive and strategic—if we have great discussion but
   don’t get past this slide, the meeting likely would be more
   successful than if we complete the deck but don’t have that
   engagement.




Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                              2
Johnson County Election Office By The Numbers

                                        Staff Members:             Voters: 
                                        16 Full‐time               358,000 +
                                        Employees, up to 
                                        250 part‐time


                                                                   Voting 
                                    Precincts: 447
                                                                   Locations: varies
                                                                   150 Spring ‐
                                                      Voting       285 Presidential
                                                      Machines: 
                                                      2,407
                                                                            Ballot 
                            Advance Voting 
                                                                            Styles: 
                            Locations: 4
                                                                            Up to 
                                                                            1,461


Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                               3
Johnson County

        Potential
   800,000                           Benefits                    Potential Drawbacks
                                                                               744,059
   700,000                                                                 644,559
   600,000                                                     550,904

   500,000                                         451,086

   400,000                               355,054                                       463,333
                                                                           411,191
                           270,269
   300,000                                                     360,000
                                                   312,788
   200,000
   100,000                 155,769       173,570

                 0
                             1980         1990      2000        2010        2020        2030

                                           Population      Active Voter Registration

 Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Johnson County Election Office, Mid-America Regional Council

 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                               4
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011   5
Johnson County Elections, 2009

            JAN         FEB           MAR        APR    MAY     JUN   JUL   AUG        SEP     OCT           NOV    DEC




 25   Spring Primary


 26          Spring General

                                            27    Roeland Pk Ward 4

                                                                                  28          Fairway



                                                                                                   29          Merriam




                                                                                                        30     2010 Spring Primary

                                                                                                        31     2010 Spring General

                  Regularly Scheduled Elections                                            Special Elections

                 Primary                    General                          Mail Ballot           Polls           Recall



  Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                                              6
Johnson County Elections, 2010

                JAN         FEB       MAR      APR      MAY    JUN   JUL   AUG      SEP         OCT         NOV       DEC


      29     Merriam




 30        Spring Primary


 31    Gardner Recall I

 32 Gardner Recall II

 33              Spring General


                34                          Primary Partisan


                                                               35          2010 General

                                                                                                      36           City of De Soto

                                                                                                      37        2011 Spring Primary

                                                                                                      38        2011 Spring General

                       Regularly Scheduled Elections                                        Special Elections

                     Primary                General                           Mail Ballot           Polls           Recall



  Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                                                  7
Johnson County Elections, 2011

           JAN         FEB           MAR      APR       MAY       JUN    JUL   AUG    SEP         OCT         NOV      DEC

   36     City of De Soto

   37   2011 Spring Primary

   38          2011 Spring General

                                     39    Spring Hill School District


                                                                   40            City of Mission




                                                                                                      41   Blue Valley School District


                                                                                                      42      Gardner School District



                                                                                                      43          Roeland Park?



                 Regularly Scheduled Elections                                                Special Elections

                Primary                    General                              Mail Ballot           Polls          Recall



 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                                                      8
Johnson County Elections, 2012

                 JAN        FEB           MAR      APR      MAY    JUN   JUL   AUG     SEP         OCT         NOV    DEC

41        BV Schools


42        Gardner Sch



43         Roeland Park?


44          Spring Primary


     45          Spring General


                 46                             Primary Partisan


                                                                   47           2012 Presidential




                                                                                                          48
                                                                                                                Spring General


                        Regularly Scheduled Elections                                          Special Elections

                      Primary                   General                          Mail Ballot           Polls         Recall



      Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                                          9
Johnson County, Kansas
Est. Population 550,000               Registered Voters 358,592
Registered Voters 350,000




                                      New Internet Party “Americans Elect” = 0

  Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                              10
Johnson County Voting Statistics
                                                 Registered Voters            Total Voted            Turnout %

 Year         JoCoPop                Growth%   November     Growth%       November    Growth%     November    Trend
 1960              143,792                        77,420                     65,033                    84%

 1964              177,137               23%      84,059             9%      72,483         11%        86%            2%

 1968              212,245               20%     100,610         20%         88,314         22%        88%            2%

 1972              231,933                9%     120,407         20%        104,136         18%        86%        -1%

 1976              243,953                5%     140,956         17%        117,040         12%        83%        -3%

 1980              266,489                9%     155,769         11%        125,637         7%         81%        -2%

 1984              283,666                6%     169,773             9%     141,715         13%        83%            3%

 1988              328,537               16%     185,727             9%     155,267         10%        84%            1%

 1992              374,801               14%     222,815         20%        197,265         27%        89%            5%

 1996              411,635               10%     246,497         11%        192,202         -3%       78.0%      -11%

 2000              451,086               10%     312,788         27%        218,486         14%        70%        -8%

 2004              496,691               10%     348,552         11%        259,599         19%        75%            5%

 2008              532,215                7%     364,441             5%     285,001         10%       78.2%           3%

 2012 e            551,529                4%     390,000             7%     292,500         3%         75%        -3%


 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                               11
Voting is Local




 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011   12
Legislative Changes Since 2008
•         Secure And Fair Elections (SAFE) Act
•         Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act
•         Full ballot for overseas voters
•         Changes in Canvass dates




Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                              13
Key Legislative Outcomes:
1.     There will be no presidential preference primary in 2012. Parties will conduct
       caucuses.
2.     Beginning in 2012, every voter must show photo identification each time they vote.
3.     By-mail advance voters who ask other people to mail or deliver their ballots must
       designate the delivery persons in writing.
4.     Beginning in 2013, individuals must provide proof of U.S. citizenship when they
       register to vote for the first time in Kansas.
5.     The candidate filing deadline in even-year elections is moved from noon on June
       10 to noon on June 1.
6.     In the redistricting year of 2012, the candidate filing deadline may be June 1, June
       10 or, if there is litigation, a date set by a court.
7.     The voter registration deadline for all elections is moved from the 15th day to the
       21st day before the election.
8.     The county canvass is held either on Monday or the second Thursday following the
       election, rather than Friday or Monday.
9.     The deadline to request a single-district recount in a specific county is 5:00 pm the
       day following the county canvass. Once requested, recounts must be completed in
       5 calendar days.
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                    14
Even More Legislative Outcomes:
1. Uniformed and Overseas Citizen Access Voting Abroad
   (UOCAVA) voters now vote a complete ballot, with all the races
   and issues that regular ballots contain.
2. UOCAVA voters must submit ballot applications annually instead
   of once every two years.
3. In local elections held in the spring of odd-numbered years, a
   primary is held if more than 3 candidates file for an office, and the
   two candidates receiving the most votes in the primary move on to
   the general election.
4. Candidates for state offices file their campaign finance reports only
   with the Secretary of State, not with the county election officer.
5. Candidates may not appear in advertisements or public service
   announcements within 60 days of a primary election, extending
   until the general election is over.

Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                    15
Federal Service Voters
                                      Growth in Federal Service Ballots 
                                      2000
                     Ballots Issued

                                      1500                                        1515
                                                                1165
                                      1000
                                                  530
                                       500
                                         0
                                                2000
                                                              2004
                                                                                 2008
                                                        Presidential Elections

   Literally, each of these voters (who vote using procedures from the Uniformed and
  Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act—UOCAVA) requires the involvement of a staff
  member to ensure ballots are received and returned. It would be the equivalent of one
                   sales person managing the Fortune 1500 companies.
 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                        16
Census Impacts
The Chief Election Officer is each county’s point person for the
census:
•          Redistricting will move voters from different congressional,
           senate, and state legislative districts.
•          This redistricting may not be completed until late spring,
           leaving a crunch mode to move voters, create new maps, and
           process candidate filings in early June.
•          Potential for Spanish ballots comes from the census and we
           should know the outcome of that within a month:
                Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 mandates that a state or
                political subdivision must provide language assistance to voters if more
                than 5 percent of the voting age citizens are members of a single-
                language minority group or if more than 10,000 of the voting age
                citizens are members of a single-language minority group.

Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                    17
Area Closings Will Impact 2012
More than 50,000 voters cast ballots by mail in 2008. 40,000
ballots were mailed out 20 days before election day, the first
day they could be mailed by law.
  •        In 2012, the downtown Olathe Post Office will be closed,
           adding more complexity to our mail processing.
  •        Further, the U.S. Postal Service is nearing default on its
           financial obligations, which will trigger Congressional
           action. It’s possible service on one or more days will
           eventually end, making voting by mail, potentially,
           unviable in the long-term.
  •        Similarly, the election office now has only one newspaper
           for the many statutorily required publications following
           the closing of the Johnson County Sun.

Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                       18
Other Uncertainties
The Election Office is required to serve as an advance voting
location.
 • Others used in 2008 may not be available (Metcalf South or Shawnee) or
   viable (Northeast Offices) in 2012.
 • It’s too early to negotiate with landlords for alternate sites because there is
   optimism on their part that space will be filled. Negotiations are resource-
   intensive.
 • We’ve had a civic-minded lease with Metcalf South but other locations cost
   $5,000 per month or more. Leases are for 5 months.
 • Similarly, polling places must be assigned this fall and polling places are
   difficult to obtain, making advance voting vital. Without advance voting, we
   would need 450 polling locations and at least 800 more voting machines.
 • Like all Johnson County employees, election workers have felt the economy’s
   impacts. They have not had an increase since 2006, although they will work a
   15-hour day in November 2012. (Polls are open an hour longer in presidential
   elections). By law, election worker pay is set by the BOCC.
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                               19
Advance Voting—2008 Presidential
 50 percent of voters voted in advance. The distribution results in
 three distinct elections—in person advance, advance by mail,
 and in-person at the polls.            In-Person Advance    86,020
                                        By-Mail Advance                        55,585
                                        In-Person Election Day                143,396
                                        Total                                 285,001*

                                        *--provisional votes distributed proportionately
                                           to election night totals


                                               (In-Person Election Day)
                                               (In-Person Advance)
                                               (By-Mail Advance)




 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                  20
Advance Voting
 Almost half of Johnson County’s in-person advance totals were
 from non-county owned locations.




                               In-Person Johnson County Election Office    29,695
                               In-Person Metcalf South                     22,883
                               In-Person Shawnee                           18,025
                               In-Person Johnson County Northeast Office   15,417
                               Total                                       86,020

 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                  21
Polling Place Layout and Flow
                                                                                              Perfect Voter
                                                                                              votes and exits
                                                                                              machine            Voting
              Provisional                                                                                        machine
              booth




                                                                                                                Voting
                                                                                                                machine
            Perfect Voter returns deactivated
            Voter Card to container and receives                                          Election worker
   EW                                                                                     admits Perfect
            “I Voted” sticker
                                                                                          Voter to voting
                                                                                       EW machine and
                                                        Perfect Voter receives            confirms precinct
Voter                                                   plastic Voter Card                split & party
                                    Perfect Voter                                         affiliation (in
enters here                                             encoded according to                                    Voting
                                    receives Voter                                        partisan election)
                                    Receipt             receipt
                                                                                                                machine
              Voter checks in

                                                             Encoder
                                                             machine

                                                                                                                Voting
                                                                                                                machine
 Advance voting is similar, except that computers are connected to the statewide voter registration system.
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                                          22
Citizen Satisfaction
Even with the same number of full-time staff as in 1996, Elections
ranks well in the county’s citizen survey.




    Satisfaction
    levels have
    been similar in
    the 2005,
    2007, and 2009
    surveys.




Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                              23
Human Capital Issues
                  Johnson-Wyandotte Election Office Comparison
  Registered Voters 2011             Voters served per staff          Average Salary (2008)

                                      National average of voters
                                      served per full-time employee
                                      is 6,000, according to the
                                      National Association of
                                      Election Officials                          Wyandotte 
                                                                                   County
                                         Johnson County 22,412                     $53,824
                                                                      Johnson 
                Johnson County                                        County
                     358k                                             $47,063




                                        Wyandotte County 11,497



 Wyandotte County
      80k



 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                             24
Election Workers
Johnson County Election Workers
•         Minimum of 3 per polling location by law.
•         Average of 6 per polling place in 2012.
•         Must, if possible, have one representative from each party.
•         Must be a registered voter in the county and, if possible, live in the precinct.
•         Requests are made to each party for workers.
•         Students (less than 18 but 16 or older) can work as election workers, one per polling location.
•         10 percent of our workers are high-school students.
•         Average age of election workers is 68.
•         Average tenure of election workers in the 2012 election will be six years.
•         Workers are generally needed in the outlying areas—Gardner, Edgerton, De Soto, Spring Hill,
          and Stilwell.
•         County employees from 19 departments have served as election workers.
•         Workers train for 3 hours before each election; supervising judges receive a second training just
          for that function.
•         Workers provide their own transportation and meals.
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                   25
Freedom Isn’t Free…
…But In Johnson County, It Almost Is
 Of the 284 polling places Johnson County utilized in 2008:
                                                 Total polling place rent, Aug. and Nov.
                                      50 Paid    2008, estimated: $5,000




                                      234 Free




 • Johnson County’s Election Office was able to negotiate $2,000
   in total rent at Metcalf South for advance voting in August
   and November 2006.
 • 2008 rent for two sites was $30,000.
  Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                        26
Polling Places by the Numbers
                               Johnson County Polling Places and Registered Voters
                                        Presidential Elections 1996 - 2008

                         350                                                                    400,000
                                                                                 360,000
                                                                 348,552
                         300                                                                    350,000
                                                  312,788

                                                                                                300,000
                         250
                                 246,497                                        1,267




                                                                                                          Registered Voters
                                                                1,219           Voters per      250,000
        Polling Places




                                                1,208           Voters per      Polling Place
                         200
                                1,086           Voters per      Polling Place
                                Voters per      Polling Place                                   200,000
                                Polling Place
                         150
                                                                                                150,000

                         100
                                                                                                100,000

                          50                                                                    50,000

                                   227              259             286             284
                           0                                                                    0
                                   1996             2000           2004            2008
Brian D. Newby, November 29, 2007                                                                         27
Voting Technology
Johnson County has used voting machines for
more than 40 years, since 1966.
•   Voters authorized the county to purchase voting
    machines.
•   For most under the age of 65, voting on machine,
    rather than paper, has been the method of voting the
    entire time they have voted in Johnson County.
                                                                             2001
•   Johnson County moved to touch-screen voting                 First
                                                                             Version,
                                                                generation
    machines in 2001 and implemented them in 2002.              machine      Diebold TS


•   These machines were bought from Global Election Systems, a company
    acquired by Diebold shortly after Johnson County’s 2001 equipment
    purchase.
•   Essentially, these machines are using 1990s touch-screen technology (four-
    wire resistive): Smartphones and tablet computers like iPhones and iPads
    weren’t invented yet when these machines were designed. These new
    devices use much more advanced touch-screen technology.
    Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                             28
History of Voting Technology
Johnson County is utilizing its second generation of DRE
Touch-Screen Machines.
• Older TS machines were replaced by TSX machines.
• 300 TS machines were retained as encoders (one per polling
  place, prepares ballot on voter card) until 2008.
• TSx machines utilized as encoders beginning in 2008.
• Diebold renamed election division “Premier” in 2007 and sold
  Premier to Election Systems and Software (ES&S) in 2009.
• Department of Justice sued Election Systems and Software in
  2010, resulting in divestiture of intellectual property of
  Premier’s recently certified software to Dominion Voting
  Systems.

Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                              29
History of Voting Technology
  What this means to Johnson County:
  • TSx machines are no longer being manufactured.
  • Johnson County does not pay the $100,000 annual
    maintenance contract on the TSx machines.
  • Johnson County is in a unique position where it could be
    supported by ES&S or Dominion. However, because much of
    what we do is autonomous, without vendor involvement, this
    position is less impactful than it could be. If we move to the
    new certified software on these machines, however, we must
    do that with Dominion.
  • In 2012, machines will be 9 years old, with estimated life of 7
    to 10 years. (TS machine parts began failing within 5 years).

Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                30
Touch-Screen Voting Timeline

  2001                               • TS Units put into 
                                       service
                                     • Express Polls 
•Johnson County                        delivered, but not yet 
 Purchases 860 TS Units                certified for use
 and 300 Express Polls 
 (electronic poll 
 books/encoders)                     2002                        TS Unit




                              2004
 •California Decertifies voting machines without Voter 
  Verifiable Paper Audit Trail

 •Johnson County trades up, replacing its 860 machines 
  for new and used TSX machines (from California), 
  bringing the fleet to 1,305
                                                                     Express Poll

Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                   31
Touch-Screen Voting Timeline

  2005                              • Johnson County 
                                      orders 576 additional 
                                      TSx machines with 
•Express Polls certified              dollars from the Help 
•Boxes opened; order not              America Vote Act. 
 complete
•Statewide voter 
 registration/election 
 management system is 
                                    2006                             TSx Unit



 successfully implemented

                                     2007
           •Express Polls not accepted because the technology is outdated.
           •300 TS machines returned to Diebold
           •576 TSx machines ordered in 2006 delivered and accepted (there was no 
            warehouse space for the new machines until the TS machines were sent back)



Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                        32
Touch-Screen Voting Timeline

                              2008
 •125 machines are purchased from Diebold/Premier.  TSx machines used as encoders.



                               2011
  •400 purchased from ES&S, putting fleet at 2406.
  •Election office does not have the capability to store or power additional machines.
  •Table retrofit is underway to allow space for these new units in our warehouse



                              2017
 •Spring election would be the absolute drop‐dead date for the lifespan of this system to 
  be exhausted.


Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                            33
Voting Technology
During the next election cycle, the Election Office will post
videos on YouTube to demonstrate the method of calibrating
and testing voting machines. This sign also appears at our
polling locations.

                                                 Please Note
                                        Touch screens on voting machines are
                                         sensitive.

                                        You must retouch a wrong selection to
                                         cancel it before making another
                                         selection.

                                        Carefully review your choices on the
                                         summary page prior to casting your
                                         ballot.

 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                               34
Audit Trail
     Johnson County’s voting machines have an audit trail consistent with the
     Help America Vote Act, as well as Kansas Secretary of State and voluntary
     voting guidelines.

• Do they have a paper trail?
             Yes. Ballots cast can be and have been printed for recounts. Ballots are stored,
             with voter privacy, on the machine’s hard drive and on a removable drive.

• Do they have a paper trail with a printer on the side?
             No. This is often referred to as a Voter Verifiable Paper Audit
             Trail (VVPAT). This capability was invented after Johnson
             County’s machines were built. The lack of VVPAT was why the
             machines were de-certified in California. Kansas Secretary of
             State Kris Kobach would prefer all systems have a formal paper
             trail (VVPAT or paper ballots). Upgrading to VVPAT capability
             with Johnson County’s current system is not an option. The
             machines could be upgraded with new software, from Dominion,
             at a cost estimate of approximately $1.8 million.
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                         35
Machine Security
The Johnson County Election Office is staffed by 16 sworn election
professionals who adhere to The Election Center’s Code of Ethics,
which was adopted by our office in 1997.
        • The Election Office full-time staff manages all aspects of elections for residents of Johnson County.
        • The staff is responsible for programming, verifying, tabulating, and controlling every election.
        • We utilize seasoned election workers to conduct all of our pre-election testing.
        • The vendor has never programmed our elections and does not have remote access to our
          election software.
        • We control our own elections—no outside entity is involved in programming or election-day support.

Our office building, located at 2101 E. Kansas City Road in Olathe, has
controlled access and is secured through an alarm system with a numbered
lock and password-protected entrance keypad.
       • Within the building there are numerous rooms with different levels of controlled access.
       • The election computer room and the ballot storage vault are monitored by security cameras 24 hours a
         day, 7 days a week.
       • Combination lock passwords are changed after each election cycle.




Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                           36
Machine Security (cont.)
The election software computer is freestanding. It is not networked within
the office or connected to the Internet.
       1. Physically, the vendor’s election software and each individual election database are
          secured on a computer that is accessible by few members of our office staff only.
       2. This computer is installed in a secure room with controlled access. One staff member
          has a key to enter the room, but the room requires a code as well from another staff
          member. Thus, 2 persons are in the room, at a minimum, at any time.
       3. A video camera also records all activity in this room.
       4. The computer requires a password, which only one employee knows. The specific
          election requires a different password, again known by only one employee.
       5. Individual election database files are backed up at designated milestones and secured in
          the tabulation room and in off-site storage.
       6. All voting machine keys, voter cards, and storage media are secured in a controlled
          access room. Staff maintains a detailed inventory control of these supplies.
       7. Keys and combinations are assigned so that any election-centric procedure requires at
          least two persons.
       8. On Election Night, our election results are hand-carried by election judges to election
          headquarters.
       9. We do not use modems to transmit results.


Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                              37
7:30
                                                                      11:30
             Polling Place
                 (285)
                                                                              Results   11:00

                 PC Card                                                       Server


                                                         Results
          8:00
            Drop-
            Off Site
             (20)                                                             Upload
PC Card                      PC Card
             PC Card
                                                                              (2,200)
                                                                    8:40


                                               Election Office
                                              PC CardPC Card
                                                          PC Card


Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                        38
Election Setup
The Johnson County Election Office may use only voting systems, equipment and
software certified through the Kansas Secretary of State’s Office.

A voting system must pass three levels of tests before it can be used in Kansas - Federal
Qualification Tests, State Certification Tests, and local Acceptance Tests. Our policy has
been to receive software updates directly from the Independent Testing Authority that
certified the software.
       1.    Before each election our office conducts a Systems Diagnostic Test on each voting machine to ensure that it is
             operating properly.
       2.    Logic and Accuracy (L&A) Tests are performed on each election data card. In addition, an L&A is done to
             test the integration of the voting machine data cards with the paper ballot system.
       3.    This L&A assures the accuracy of the entire process for every election – merging of paper ballot and machine
             votes to expected hand-calculated outcomes, including a review of all reports.
       4.    Throughout the entire testing process there is an internal separation of duties and dual sign-off accountability
             on all processes—maintaining an extensive audit trail, including all proofing documentation.
       5.    Tabulation effectiveness is demonstrated through a public test, with notice published by law and verified
             again post-election.
       6.    Each voting machine is secured with a unique padlock and key combination.
       7.    Data cards for the voting machines are secured at the Election Office until the afternoon before the election,
             when they are picked up in a numbered, sealed pouch by the Supervising Judge of each polling place.
       8.    On Election Day, poll workers confirm the seal numbers on PC card pouches and voting machines, then
             verify protective counters before inserting PC cards into voting machines to activate the election. This
             validation is signed by all sworn election workers.



Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                                      39
Election Day
 Each polling place in our county is staffed by sworn election
 workers, who have attended a mandatory training session during
 each election cycle.
          1.  The Supervising Judge is responsible for balancing the number of voters processed to votes collected
              periodically throughout the day. On election day, the Supervising Judge maintains control of all machine
              keys.
          2. There are numerous checks and balances in place, including separation of duties as each voter moves
              through the polling place.
          3. A beginning “zero proof” printout from each voting machine validates that there are no votes stored on the
              results cartridges. This printout is signed by all sworn election workers.
          4. An individual voter receipt is issued to each voter at check-in. A voter must present a voter receipt in order
              to be issued a voting machine activation card.
          5. An activation card is not issued until a voting machine is available for use.
          6. Each voter is escorted to a voting machine by a Machine Attendant. The Machine Attendant used the voter
              receipt to validate that the correct ballot is displayed for the voter.
          7. The voter receipt is deposited in an envelope at the voting machine, providing a paper audit trail for the
              number of votes collected in each voting machine. The voter receipt is comparable to a paper ballot stub.
          8. The voter cards are collected at the exit door by an election worker.
          9. An end-of-day tally includes balancing voters processed to votes collected, and validating that the numbers
              of voter cards issued to the polling place are being returned to the Election Office.
          10. A closing printout from each voting machine confirms the total number of votes collected in each machine.
              This printout is again signed by all sworn election workers.
          11. The election results data cards, again secured in a numbered, sealed pouch, are hand-carried by election
              judges to the Election Office, where the votes are tabulated.

Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                                     40
Further Security Concerns
 Despite the focus on security, more investment could be made:
          1. We have outsourced a security audit and received a proposal that we are reviewing
             internally and with facilities, which has, itself, conducted a security audit.
          2. Likely, proposals will be brought to the BOCC for additional spending on cameras
             and fencing.
          3. Aside from election security, a risk exists from the hacking industry—not of
             voting machines but of other county systems that could impact voter confidence:
              1. For instance, a hacker who could reach the elections website—stored at the
                 county—could cause voters to wonder if others systems were impacted.
              2. Four election office websites have been hacked since July 2011.
              3. Election and website systems are unrelated and unassociated, and the ITS group
                 understands the concern, but this is a security issue outside of the control of the
                 Election Office.
              4. Any issue “outside of the control of the Election Office,” could still cause
                 voters to wonder how much control our office actually has over voting security.
              5. While we have great control over election security, mitigating effects of any
                 unrelated outside force is something of which we are continually mindful.



Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                               41
These individuals have become celebrated election hactivists,
      having hacked a District of Columbia Internet election trial
      (by invitation). They have obtained a TSx machine and
      sponsored a hacking election on the machine at a national
      conference.




Example of a high-profile
    hactivist, 2006
Next Generation Voting
     Certification to the 2012 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines
     (under development) requires the use of paper:
               • Machines with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail
               • Paper ballots
               • Devices which print paper


       $13 million is considered the high side for the most expensive
       solution—Machines with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail.
       Johnson County will need to consider a total cost solution
       (capital and operating costs) when developing and evaluating
       its Request for Proposal.

Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                   43
History of Voting Technology
New systems must:
        • Be federally certified by the Election Assistance Commission
          (EAC)
        • Comply with the EAC’s 2008 Voluntary Voting Systems
          Guidelines
        • Be certified in the state of Kansas
         Currently, no system meets this criteria.
  Internet voting likewise does not meet this criteria. Internet voting has security risks but is the
  centerpiece of the MOVE Act. If Internet voting becomes successful with military voters, the industry
  likely will be pulled to this technology.

  Another backdrop to these issues is the role of the EAC, empowered by the Help America Vote Act.
  Many--including the National Association of Secretaries of State, the current Kansas Secretary of State,
  and the Johnson County Election Commissioner—believe the EAC has outlived its role and should be
  abolished or blended into other agencies. This would place more emphasis on Kansas certification and
  may allow for more innovation and, definitely, reduced costs. A bill to abolish the EAC was introduced
  in the House of Representatives but did not gain the votes needed to advance to the Senate.
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                   44
Elections as Public Policy
       The equipment issues facing Johnson County are not solely
                   Retrofit Fleet of 1,881 TSx Machines
       election issues. They are public policy issues that require the
       same consideration by the Board of County Commissioners as
       other service levels with other agencies.

      Considerations of any equipment decisions
      • How will service levels be changed now?
      • Will any change limit our service level options in the future?
                       Put Machines on Ice, Go Paper
      • What is the possibility of stranded investment?
      • What is the possibility of federal or state funding?
      • Will action now limit or prevent cost recovery from federal
        or state sources?



Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                     45
So Why Not Go Back to Paper?
     This question is often asked by voters. “Back to Paper” has an
     impractical romantic quality.
     Perception                                            Reality
       •     Less susceptible to fraud.                •    The potential for fraud is what drove the use
                                                            of voting machines. Voter intent questions
                                                            come to the forefront, leaving more elections
                                                            decided by courts and governing bodies.
       •     Elections are cheaper.                    •    Few ballot printing vendors, use of natural
                                                            resources, and transportation costs of heavy
                                                            items, along with human resources, make this
                                                            significantly more operationally expensive.
       •     We can hand-count the votes.              •    In a small recount, hand-counting is accurate,
                                                            but in large elections with several races, hand-
                                                            counting is not accurate, and it is very time-
                                                            intensive.


       •     People can wait a few days for results.   •    We live in a 10 o’clock news society. Voter
                                                            and candidate expectations are that most or
                                                            all results will be available by the nightly
                                                            news.


Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                       46
So Why Not Go Back to Paper?
• Johnson County prints ballots in each ballot style to prepare for
  power outages, provisional voters, advance voting by mail, and
  persons who request paper. Ballot orders are placed months
  before an election with our ballot printer in Washington state—
  few vendors, and none locally, exist that can meet our printing
  needs.
• A large number of unused ballots, because of the myriad of
  styles printed, are destroyed, leading to a waste of money but
  perhaps a chance to repurpose dollars towards ballot-on-
  demand printing and back-up power capabilities at the Election
  Office, reducing the chance for a large number of provisional
  ballots if power were lost during a mandatory advance voting
  period.


Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                               47
Paper Use Since 2004
                       Printed       Used        Blank Ballots Disposed Cost*


2004                   692,485      247,071               435,414                    $174,166
2006                   387,965       46,555               341,410                    $136,564
2008                   426,860       90,481               336,379                    $134,552
2010                   316,570       72,026               244,544                    $ 97,818
 Notes:
 *--assumes $0.40 printing costs per ballot, numbers are rounded
 •    Each year represents August and November elections only. Ballots are printed for each election.
 •    2004’s presidential election was a 2-page ballot.
 •    While the current election ballot delivery model requires the printing of more ballots than
      necessary, these dollars represent a strategic opportunity to perhaps repurpose dollars towards
      another model, such as ballot on demand printing or vote centers.
 •    These costs represent printing only—other costs include storage and labor
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                               48
Vote Center Defined
• Colorado was the first to implement Vote
  Centers, in 2003.
   • A Vote Center is very much like an Advance Voting
     site – the voter can live anywhere within the county
     and vote at any voting center.
   • Difference is that it can be done on Election Day, too,
     rather than just Early Voting period.
   • A single Vote Center does not have the same
     operational efficiency of an Advance Voting site,
     simply because the Vote Center is generally a Super
     Polling Place on Election Day only, although
     Advance Voting sites could be used as Vote Centers.
  Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                            49
Vote Center Considerations
                Drivers                                     Restrainers
•   Polling locations are easier to locate.   •   Fewer locations available that meet the
                                                  requirements (large parking, available
•   Any registered voter within the               space, etc.).
    county can vote at any center without
    having to return to their own             •   Significant (unbudgeted) staff
    neighborhood polling place.                   resources needed to negotiate leases.
                                              •   Sites must be networked together.
•   Fewer provisional ballots because
    voters can vote anywhere in the           •   All paper ballots would have to be sent
    county.                                       to each site (as many as 1,500 types in
                                                  Johnson County) for provisional and
•   Fewer additional voting machines              paper voters or printed on demand.
    needed as the community grows.
                                              •   Physical security of locations.
•   Fewer election workers needed,
    approximately 25 percent less.            •   Greater chance of voter receiving the
                                                  incorrect ballot.
•   Fewer locations need to be obtained.
                                              •   Voter complaints that the local site has
•   Sites could be open through the               closed, making it harder for them to
    weekend before, blending advance              vote.
    voting with Vote Centers.                 •   Rent cost could be prohibitive.
Advance Voting Benefits
  In-person advance voting creates a better voting experience
  that could be leveraged in the Vote Center concept:
• Voter convenience—allows voters to vote on their terms.
• Election workers are more seasoned—working daily instead
  of two or three times a year.
• Voting machine utilization reduces the county’s overall capital
  investment.
       November 2008
       Machine Utilization
       Percentage
          Each advance voting site
          reduced the need for 40
           polling places and 200
             voting machines.
  Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                 51
2008 Physical Capital Issues
                                                   Overhangs to the dock
                                                 doors were never replaced;
                                                  equipment becomes wet
                                                  when loaded in the rain.



                                                       Employees park in the
                                                           grass and mud,
                                                        arriving and leaving
                                                             in the dark.




                                     This is the secure ballot
                                       drop box that was
                                      inadequate in 2008.


                                                      One of many areas in
                                                      need of repair in the
                                                          parking lot.



 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                             52
Further Building Issues
• Likely, the Election Office facility will be
  completely out of space by 2014.
   • The office must be open, by law, for advance voting.
   • One way or another, more equipment will be needed by 2016,
     even if the additional equipment obtained are laptops to check-in
     voters and extend the life of the voting machines.
   • There is no room to store and fulfill the additional paper ballots
     expected because of new precincts and parties.
   • Warehouse restrooms are not ADA-compliant.
   • The facility is extremely vulnerable in the event of power failure,
     which could delay election results or result in thousands of
     provisional ballots.


  Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                   53
Election Laws/Regulations

                                     Elections fall under federal and
                                     state oversight:
                                        • National Voter Registration Act (NVRA)
                                          governs list maintenance activities
                                        • Help America Vote Act (HAVA) governs
                                          election administration
                                        • State statutes detail election
                                          requirements
                                        • Secretary of State Standards clarify and
                                          enhance state requirements



 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                             54
Voter Registration Requirements
Current Requirements to register to vote:
     United States Citizen
     Resident of the State of Kansas and the County listed
      on the registration
     18 years of age or older by the date of the next
      election




 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                        55
Election Office Responsibilities
 The Election Office is responsible for conducting a program that
 makes a reasonable effort to remove names of registrants who have:
   Died
   Moved to another County or State
   Inactive voters removed for failure to vote in two consecutive
    federal general elections
   Requested to be removed
   Are no longer eligible to vote




                                                                56
Election Office Responsibilities

 1) Mail two notices non-forwardable first class mail
 2) Transfer of voters to “inactive” status
        -         Maintain for two full federal election cycles (4 years)
        -         Or through the second general election for federal office
                  following the date the voter was transferred to inactive.

                                     When we conduct a full voter mailing we
                                     get thousands of mail pieces to verify.




 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                             57
Voter Registration Process

               Complete = Registered                                                     Incomplete information = Rejected



                                                     Incomplete 
                                                    Information= 
                                                      Suspense




                         Registrant is sent a letter requesting the additional information that is 
                         necessary to complete their registration. 




    If the registrant                                                                                 If the registrant does 
    provides that                                                                                     not provide that 
    information=                                                                                      information
    Registered.                                                                                       Not Registered.
Mass Mailing Process                                                                         OFFICE OF THE KANSAS SECRETARY OF STATE
                                                                                      NCOA / MASS MAILING / CROSSCHECK 
                                                                                                  RESULTS


1. Receive evidence of a              2. Receive evidence of a             3. Receive response from post 
move within the county.               move out of the county.              office saying “undeliverable” or “no 
                                                                           forwarding address”.




                                                                                                         Send forwardable confirmation 
                                      Send forwardable                                                   mailing to address on file and 
Update the registrant’s               confirmation mailing to                                            make voter record “Inactive”. 
record with the new                   new address and make 
address.                              voter record “Inactive”. Do 
                                      not update the 
                                      registrant’s record yet.

                                                                                                     Response from voter.




Send forwardable                      No response – Must fail to 
confirmation mailing to new           vote and have no contact 
address.                              until after second 
                                      consecutive federal            Voter responds with        Voter responds with        Voter confirms 
                                      general election, then         no change to record.       move in county,            move out of 
                                      cancel voter registration.     Remove “Inactive”          update address and         county, cancel 
                                                                     designation.               remove “Inactive”          voter’s 
                                                                                                designation.               registration.



  Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                                                    59
Poll Books and Voter History

                                     •When a voter signs in the 
                                     Signature Roster on Election Day, 
                                     voting history is updated.  
                                     •The poll books are scanned in the 
                                     days following the election to 
                                     update that the voter voted. 
                                     •If the voter is inactive this will 
                                     restore the registration and the 
                                     voter will become an active voter.
                                     •If the inactive voter does not 
                                     vote, then the voter is removed 
                                     from the voter file after the proper 
                                     time has elapsed. 




 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                60
Registration Systems
•         Johnson County co-developed and purchased a voter registration and election management
          system in 1997.
•         This system was selected as the same system to be used for the statewide voter registration
          system, required by the Help America Vote Act.
•         Before implementation, in early 2005, the vendor of this system and the Secretary of
          State’s office terminated these plans, leading to a new selection process and a new vendor,
          ES&S. ES&S is contracted with the Secretary of State’s office.
•         Johnson County pays approximately $40,000 annually for user security tokens to the
          Secretary of State’s office. The system’s primary missive is to securely process and
          maintain Kansas voter registration records.
•         The system was envisioned as an election management system (ballot design, reporting,
          and scheduling of workers and supplies) but it hasn’t yet fulfilled this vision, leaving
          Johnson County to operate two systems (including the now-unsupported legacy 1997
          system).
•         Replacement of this legacy system would cost approximately $100,000 likely will be
          necessary unless the state system capabilities are enhanced. While there are plans to
          enhance the system, there are limitations that have delayed this expectation.

Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                             61
Voter Investment Issues
• Johnson County has arguably the most
  engaged voters in the nation. These
  voters have high expectations and their
  utilization of the Election Office
  supports those expectations be met.
• In 2008, the BOCC approved nearly
  $230,000 of an approximate $320,000
  request for outreach. The Election
  Office recognized this was the highest
  amount ever allocated for any outreach
  project (not just elections) by the
  BOCC.
• Outreach efforts contributed to a
  reduction in provisional ballots in
  2008.
 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011          62
Key Metrics



         2/3 of Johnson County 
       Voters Would Have a 
     Different Polling Place in 
        2008 Than in 2004

 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011   63
Key Metrics
 2004                                               2008
                                       Polling
    286                                             284
                                       Places

 11,301                              Provisional
                                       Ballots
                                     “Lost Voter”
                                     Provisionals
 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                         64
Key Metrics
 2004                                               2008
                                       Polling
    286                                             284
                                       Places

 11,301                              Provisional
                                       Ballots
                                     “Lost Voter”
  4,267
                                     Provisionals
 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                         65
Key Metrics
 2004                                              2008

    286                              These would be
                                        Polling
                                                    284
                                        Places
                                       expected to
 11,301                               Provisional
                                        increase as
                                        Ballots
                                     “Lostturnout
                                           Voter”
  4,267
                                     Provisionals
                                         increased.
 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                        66
Key Metrics
 2004                                             2008

 74.5%                                Turnout

 37.8%                                Advance
                                     Percentage



 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                       67
Key Metrics
 2004                                             2008

 74.5%                                Turnout     78.3%

 37.8%                                Advance
                                     Percentage



 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                       68
Key Metrics
 2004                                             2008

 74.5%                                Turnout     78.3%

 37.8%                                Advance     49.3%
                                     Percentage



 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                       69
Key Metrics
 2004                                               2008
                                       Polling
    286                                             284
                                       Places

 11,301                              Provisional
                                       Ballots
                                     “Lost Voter”
                                     Provisionals
 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                         70
Key Metrics
 2004                                               2008
                                       Polling
    286                                             284
                                       Places

 11,301                              Provisional    8,198
                                       Ballots
                                     “Lost Voter”
                                     Provisionals
 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                         71
Key Metrics
 2004                                               2008
                                       Polling
    286                                              284
                                       Places

 11,301                              Provisional    8,198
                                       Ballots
                                     “Lost Voter”
  4,267
                                     Provisionals
 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                          72
Key Metrics
 2004                                               2008
                                       Polling
    286                                              284
                                       Places

 11,301                              Provisional    8,198
                                       Ballots
                                     “Lost Voter”
  4,267
                                     Provisionals
 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                          73
Key Metrics
 2004                                               2008
                                       Polling
    286                                              284
                                       Places

 11,301                              Provisional    8,198
                                       Ballots
                                     “Lost Voter”
  4,267                                             668
                                     Provisionals
 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                          74
Communications Components
The Election Office had an exhaustive campaign involving the following
components, with an initial push focused on the August election.

                                                 Engage Local Business
           Develop Baseline Materials
                                                 Partnerships

                                                 Utilize Public Relations
         Leverage County Resources
                                                 Opportunities

         Leverage City/Civic Resources           Utilize Strategic Media
                                                 Placement

         •      Approved dollars by the BOCC for $229,725 came to 64 cents per voter.
         •      There is no similar effort budgeted for 2012. Without a campaign,
                provisional ballots are likely to move back towards 2004 levels.




                                                                                    75
Brian D. Newby, November 29, 2007
Message
  Johnson County voters were consistently be reminded that:
  • Advance voting is more convenient than ever and can be done
    in person or by mail.
  • Polling places change for each election.
  • Voters should check their location before heading to the polls.
  • There will be lines at the polling places throughout the day,
    especially first thing in the morning. THIS IS STILL THE
    PRIMARY MESSAGE.
          Outreach efforts in this document are focused on these
          specific messages. Other messages and targets (such as
          encouraging young adults to register) are important but
          beyond the scope of this particular campaign.

Brian D. Newby, November 29, 2007                                   76
2008 Outreach Approach




                                   JoCoPoLo and “Express Lane”
                                   Public Awareness Campaign
                                   and Outreach Program to promote
                                   Election Day polling locations and
                                   Early Voting Options.




Brian D. Newby September 8, 2011                                64
Jo-Co Po-Lo



                                   www.jocopolo.com




  Johnson County Election Office
Jo-Co Po-Lo



                                   www.jocopolo.com




  Johnson County Election Office
Jo-Co Po-Lo



                                   www.jocopolo.com




  Johnson County Election Office
Website/Phone Calls
October phone call volume
was similar in 2008 and 2004,
but phone calls on election
day in 2008 were 3,600 less
than in 2004, suggesting an
impact from advance voting
and outreach efforts.




                                      The two websites had more
                                    than one million unique visits,
                                            Oct. 3-Nov. 6

Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011
                                                                  70
Components of Outreach
                                                   JoCoPoLo van, Democracy Posse, and “JP”



                          Voter types in
                           VOTEKS and
                         address to short
                              code




                          Response
                        Received within
                         60 Seconds




                                            Democracy
                                              Posse

  Johnson County Election Office                                                        4    4
Canvass
Board of County Canvassers conduct the canvass based on BOCC policy.
•             Election Commissioner is the facilitator of the process.
•             Provisional ballots are determined by the Special Elections Board,
              appointed by the Election Commissioner but not staff members. These
              persons represent a similar composition to a polling place election board
              or advance voting board.
•             Elections staff research and categorize provisional ballots for the canvass
              meeting.
•             Board of Canvassers in some counties actually adjudicate each provisional
              ballot—and could in Johnson County, but it would require an extensive
              time commitment by the BOCC members over a period of several days
              beginning the Wednesday after the election.
•             In November 2012, Board of Canvassers, or their alternates, should
              prepare to be available the full week after the election.


Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                    85
Provisional Timeline
                                                               Ballots received after
                                                               7 p.m. are considered 
                                                               late and not 
      Provisional 
                                                               provisional.  They are 
      ballots can be 
                                                               stored separately for 
      mailed. 
                                                               review if necessary.



 20 Days before Election Day     19 Days before Election Day      Tuesday, Election Day       Tuesday, 11 p.m.



                                 Research of                                    Election night provisional ballot 
                                 voted ballots as                               bags are checked in to confirm 
                                 they are received                              all have been accounted for and 
                                 in the mail begins                             locked in secure room.  Ballot 
                                 by staff.                                      bags remain sealed overnight.




Brian D. Newby, April 28, 2011                                                                             86
Provisional Timeline
                                                                             Provisional envelopes begin to 
                                                                             be sorted by general categories 
    Ballot bags are opened and                                               for research.  Research follows 
    emptied.  Ballots in each bag                                            a checklist to determine if the 
    are counted and reconciled                                               voter is eligible to vote and if 
    against the green sign‐in                                                the voter has already cast a 
    sheet.                                                                   ballot.




              Wednesday,  8 a.m.                   Wednesday,  9 a.m.                Wednesday, 11 a.m.




                                 Provisional envelopes are moved to the “E” Room.  
                                 Counts by EP Code, if necessary to know the number of 
                                 provisional ballots in close races, are recorded. 




Brian D. Newby, April 28, 2011                                                                            87
Provisional Timeline


              Researching of 
              envelopes                                                                         Research 
              continues.                                                                        continues on 
                                                                                                envelopes.



                Thursday, 8 a.m.                           Thursday, 2 p.m.                     Friday, 8 a.m.



                                 Canvass summary sheets are drafted.  Sheets summarize categories 
                                 that by law ballots are recommended to be counted and 
                                 recommended not to be counted.  Envelopes simply containing ballots 
                                 that were cast on paper, but not provisional, are reviewed and held to 
                                 be tabulated during the canvass recess the following Monday.




Brian D. Newby, April 28, 2011                                                                                   88
Provisional Timeline
                                 Research continues on envelopes. 

                                 Envelopes recommended to be processed and those 
                                 recommended not to be processed are stored separately and 
                                 tagged appropriately.

                                 Canvass summary sheets are completed and totals are 
                                 proofed.



               Saturday,  8 a.m.                         Sunday, 8 a.m.                      Monday, 9 a.m.




                 Research                                  Board of County Canvassers convene.  The Board recesses 
                 continues on                              while those envelopes recommended to be processed are 
                 envelopes.                                taken to the E Room and are worked by the Special Board.  
                                                           Results are tabulated for final results and certification by 
                                                           the Board of County Canvassers.




Brian D. Newby, April 28, 2011                                                                                  89
Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted”
                                               2004                 2006                 2008
                                    Nov.    Percentage   Nov.    Percentage   Nov.    Percentage
                                    2004     of Total    2006     of Total    2008     of Total
                                             Counted              Counted              Counted

 Name, Address                       360      4.7%       1,740     45.6%      2,117     40.1%
 Change, Correct
 Polling Place
 Name, Address                      4,267     55.1%       432      11.3%        668     12.7%
 Change, Incorrect
 Polling Place
 Mailed Advance                      585      7.6%        539      14.2%      1,836     34.8%
 Ballot, Voted at the
 Polls


 Total Counted                      7,738                3,810                5,280
 Percentage                         3.0                  2.0                  1.9
 of Total Votes
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                           90
Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted”
                                               2010                2012                2014
                                    Nov.    Percentage   Nov.   Percentage   Nov.   Percentage
                                    2010     of Total    2012    of Total    2014    of Total
                                             Counted             Counted             Counted

 Name, Address                      1,101     45.6%
 Change, Correct
 Polling Place
 Name, Address                       224      9.3%
 Change, Incorrect
 Polling Place
 Mailed Advance                      932      38.6%
 Ballot, Voted at the
 Polls


 Total Counted                      2,416
 Percentage                         1.3
 of Total Votes
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                         91
Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted”
                                               2004                 2006                 2008
                                    Nov.    Percentage   Nov.    Percentage   Nov.    Percentage
                                    2004     of Total    2006     of Total    2008     of Total
                                             Counted              Counted              Counted

 Name, Address                       360      4.7%       1,740     45.6%      2,117     40.1%
 Change, Correct
 Polling Place
 Name, Address                      4,267     55.1%       432      11.3%        668     12.7%
 Change, Incorrect
 Polling Place
 Mailed Advance                      585      7.6%        539      14.2%      1,836     34.8%
 Ballot, Voted at the
 Polls


 Total Counted                      7,738                3,810                5,280
 Percentage                         3.0                  2.0                  1.9
 of Total Votes
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                           92
Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted”
                                               2004                 2006                 2008
                                    Nov.    Percentage   Nov.    Percentage   Nov.    Percentage
                                    2004     of Total    2006     of Total    2008     of Total
                                             Counted              Counted              Counted

 Name, Address                       360      4.7%       1,740     45.6%      2,117     40.1%
 Change, Correct
 Polling Place
 Name, Address                      4,267     55.1%       432      11.3%        668     12.7%
 Change, Incorrect
 Polling Place
 Mailed Advance                      585      7.6%        539      14.2%      1,836     34.8%
 Ballot, Voted at the
 Polls


 Total Counted                      7,738                3,810                5,280
 Percentage                         3.0                  2.0                  1.9
 of Total Votes
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                           93
Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted”
                                               2004                 2006                 2008
                                    Nov.    Percentage   Nov.    Percentage   Nov.    Percentage
                                    2004     of Total    2006     of Total    2008     of Total
                                             Counted              Counted              Counted

 Name, Address                       360      4.7%       1,740     45.6%      2,117    40.1%
 Change, Correct
 Polling Place
 Name, Address                      4,267    55.1%        432      11.3%        668    12.7%
 Change, Incorrect
 Polling Place
 Mailed Advance                      585      7.6%        539      14.2%      1,836     34.8%
 Ballot, Voted at the
 Polls


 Total Counted                      7,738                3,810                5,280
 Percentage                         3.0                  2.0                  1.9
 of Total Votes
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                           94
Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted”
                                               2004                 2006                 2008
                                    Nov.    Percentage   Nov.    Percentage   Nov.    Percentage
                                    2004     of Total    2006     of Total    2008     of Total
                                             Counted              Counted              Counted

 Name, Address                       360      4.7%       1,740     45.6%      2,117    40.1%
 Change, Correct
 Polling Place
 Name, Address                      4,267    55.1%        432      11.3%        668    12.7%
 Change, Incorrect
 Polling Place
 Mailed Advance                      585      7.6%        539      14.2%      1,836     34.8%
 Ballot, Voted at the
 Polls


 Total Counted                      7,738                3,810                5,280
 Percentage                         3.0                  2.0                  1.9
 of Total Votes
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                           95
Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted”
                                               2004                 2006                 2008
                                    Nov.    Percentage   Nov.    Percentage   Nov.    Percentage
                                    2004     of Total    2006     of Total    2008     of Total
                                             Counted              Counted              Counted

 Name, Address                       360      4.7%       1,740     45.6%      2,117    40.1%
 Change, Correct
 Polling Place
 Name, Address                      4,267    55.1%        432      11.3%        668    12.7%
 Change, Incorrect
 Polling Place
 Mailed Advance                      585      7.6%        539      14.2%      1,836     34.8%
 Ballot, Voted at the
 Polls


 Total Counted                      7,738                3,810                5,280
 Percentage                         3.0                  2.0                  1.9
 of Total Votes
Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                           96
Provisional Ballot Metrics “Not Counted”
                                                2004                  2006                   2008
                                    Nov.    Percentage     Nov.   Percentage     Nov.    Percentage
                                    2004    of Total Not   2006   of Total Not   2008    of Total Not
                                              Counted               Counted                Counted

 Not Registered                     1,806     55.5%         560     60.3%        1,307     44.8%


 First Time Voter, No               1,031     31.7%          72      7.8%          316     10.9%
 Acceptable ID

 Incomplete                          204       6.7%         119     12.8%          945     32.4%
 Provisional
 Envelope
 Signature Match                      62       8.4%          18      1.9%          102      3.5%
 Total Not Counted                  3,253                   928                  2,918
 Percentage                         1.3                    0.5                   1.0
 of Total Votes


Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                97
Provisional Ballot Metrics “Not Counted”
                                                2010                  2012                  2014
                                    Nov.    Percentage     Nov.   Percentage     Nov.   Percentage
                                    2010    of Total Not   2012   of Total Not   2014   of Total Not
                                              Counted               Counted               Counted

 Not Registered                      445      30.1%


 First Time Voter, No                 18       1.2%
 Acceptable ID

 Incomplete                          661      45.0%
 Provisional
 Envelope
 Signature Match                     160      10.8%
 Total Not Counted                  1,478
 Percentage                         0.8
 of Total Votes


Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                               98
Websites
             http://www.jocoelection.org

             http://my.jocopolo.com

             http://advance.jocoelection.org

             https://voter.jocoelection.org

             http://lwv.jocoelection.org

Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011              99
Websites
                              Facebook:
                              Johnson County Election Office

                              Twitter:
                              Jocoelection

                              Podcast:
                              Election Updates on iTunes


Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                              100
Appendix A
Election Office, Relevant Statutes
Relevant Legislative Authority
 19-3419a. Salaries and car allowance of election commissioners. The election commissioners in
 any county shall receive a salary in an amount to be fixed by resolution of the board of county
 commissioners of the county. On and after January 1, 1977, the compensation so fixed shall be in an
 amount not less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per annum. Such salary shall be an annual salary
 payable in equal monthly installments.
     The election commissioner shall receive a car allowance in an amount to be fixed by resolution of
 the board of county commissioners.



 19-3420. Assistant election commissioners; appointment, salary; expenses. The election
 commissioner shall appoint one assistant, known as assistant election commissioner, who shall receive
 an annual salary to be fixed by the election commissioner and shall be paid in the same manner as
 other county officers and employees, and in addition the election commissioner shall certify to the
 board of county commissioners the amount necessary for clerk hire and expense, which amount shall
 be allowed by the board of county commissioners of said county. The board of county commissioners
 shall also authorize the statutory mileage allowance provided for in K.S.A. 75-3203 for the assistants
 of the election commissioner, to provide and maintain means of travel within their county. In counties
 having a population of more than two hundred thousand (200,000) the election commissioner shall
 appoint two (2) assistants, known as assistant election commissioners who shall be paid as provided
 for in this act.



  Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                      102
Relevant Legislative Authority
 19-3424. Powers, authority and duties; ward and precinct boundaries; notices of elections;
 printing ballots; election contests; budget. The election commissioner, as a part of his or her official
 duties shall have and exercise the following powers and authority:
     (a) Such commissioner shall establish and fix the boundaries of wards and precincts within the
 county and in all cities the greater part of the population of which is located in said county. Such
 commissioner shall accept and file nomination and declaration papers of candidates and declarations of
 party affiliation.
     (b) Such commissioner shall give notice by publication in the official county paper, at least fifteen
 (15) days before the holding of any election, except as otherwise provided by law, of the time of
 holding such election, and the officers at that time to be chosen, and any other matters to be voted
 upon.
     (c) Such commissioner shall publish notice giving the proper party designation if required by law,
 the title of each office, the names and addresses of all persons seeking national and state offices and as
 certified to such county election officer by the secretary of state, as provided by law, and of all persons
 from whom nomination papers or declarations have been filed with such election officer as provided
 by law, giving the name and address of each, the title to such office, the day of the election, the hours
 during which the polls will be open and the location of the voting place in each precinct or area, and
 mail to all persons whose nomination or declaration papers are on file with such election officer, a
 copy of the first issue containing such publication notice.




  Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                       103
Relevant Legislative Authority
 19-3424 (cont). Powers, authority and duties; ward and precinct boundaries; notices of
 elections; printing ballots; election contests; budget. The election commissioner, as a part of his or
 her official duties shall have and exercise the following powers and authority:
    (d) Such commissioner shall have charge of the printing of the ballots for all elections to which
 this act applies held within the county, or held within any city, school district, township or drainage
 district located in said county. Such commissioner shall conduct negotiations for the letting of the
 contract to print such ballots and shall let the contract, with the approval of the board of county
 commissioners.
     (e) Such commissioner shall be the clerk of the court for the trial of contested elections except
 national and state elections, and all intentions to contest any election shall be filed with said election
 commissioner, and shall proceed in accordance with any laws of the state dealing with the subject.
     On or before July 15 of each year, the election commissioner shall certify to the board of county
 commissioners an itemized statement showing the amount necessary to pay the salary of the election
 commissioner, the deputy election commissioner and other employees in the office of the election
 commissioner and other expenses of said office during the next ensuing budget year and the county
 commissioners shall cause the same to be included in the county budget for such ensuing budget year.
 19-3435. Same; how salaries and expenses paid. That the salaries and expenses of the office of the
 election commissioner as in this act provided, the cost of printing and distributing the ballots and all
 other expenses connected with county-wide elections whether primary, general or special elections, in
 counties having an election commissioner, shall be paid by the county. The expense of all drainage
 district elections shall be paid by the drainage district holding such election from the general fund of
 such drainage district.
  Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                       104
Relevant Legislative Authority
 19-3435a. Election commissioner; salaries and expenses of office; tax levy, use of proceeds. The
 board of county commissioners in any county having an election commissioner, is hereby authorized to
 make a tax levy in each year, in such amount as may be necessary in order to provide the necessary
 fund for the payment of the salaries and expenses of the office of the election commissioner and of
 election expenses as provided for in K.S.A. 19-3435 and to pay a portion of the principal and interest
 on bonds issued under the authority of K.S.A. 12-1774, and amendments thereto, by cities located in
 the county. Said tax levy shall be in addition to all other tax levies authorized or limited by law and
 shall not be subject to nor within the aggregate tax levy limit prescribed by K.S.A. 79-1947, or acts
 amendatory thereof.




  Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011                                                                   105

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais de briandnewby

Voting Equipment Considerations
Voting Equipment ConsiderationsVoting Equipment Considerations
Voting Equipment Considerationsbriandnewby
 
Lock the Vote, Travis County
Lock the Vote, Travis CountyLock the Vote, Travis County
Lock the Vote, Travis Countybriandnewby
 
November 2012 Canvass Sheets
November 2012 Canvass SheetsNovember 2012 Canvass Sheets
November 2012 Canvass Sheetsbriandnewby
 
Ballotscanvass110612
Ballotscanvass110612Ballotscanvass110612
Ballotscanvass110612briandnewby
 
National Republican Party Response to the Presidential Commission on Election...
National Republican Party Response to the Presidential Commission on Election...National Republican Party Response to the Presidential Commission on Election...
National Republican Party Response to the Presidential Commission on Election...briandnewby
 
Implementing a Voting System From a Local Election Adminstrator's Viewpoint
Implementing a Voting System From a Local Election Adminstrator's ViewpointImplementing a Voting System From a Local Election Adminstrator's Viewpoint
Implementing a Voting System From a Local Election Adminstrator's Viewpointbriandnewby
 
Election Management System Sample Reports
Election Management System Sample ReportsElection Management System Sample Reports
Election Management System Sample Reportsbriandnewby
 
Election Management System Sample Reports
Election Management System Sample ReportsElection Management System Sample Reports
Election Management System Sample Reportsbriandnewby
 
Johnson County Election Office's 2015 Capital Budget Submission for Next Gene...
Johnson County Election Office's 2015 Capital Budget Submission for Next Gene...Johnson County Election Office's 2015 Capital Budget Submission for Next Gene...
Johnson County Election Office's 2015 Capital Budget Submission for Next Gene...briandnewby
 
Contingencies and Change Management, EAC Webinar, July 2013
Contingencies and Change Management, EAC Webinar, July 2013Contingencies and Change Management, EAC Webinar, July 2013
Contingencies and Change Management, EAC Webinar, July 2013briandnewby
 
Contingencies and Change anagement
Contingencies and Change anagementContingencies and Change anagement
Contingencies and Change anagementbriandnewby
 
Merle King, Elections Administrators are IT Managers
Merle King, Elections Administrators are IT ManagersMerle King, Elections Administrators are IT Managers
Merle King, Elections Administrators are IT Managersbriandnewby
 
2012 ppp submission training with personas johnson county kansas
2012 ppp submission training with personas johnson county kansas2012 ppp submission training with personas johnson county kansas
2012 ppp submission training with personas johnson county kansasbriandnewby
 
Accessible Elections Design Workshop
Accessible Elections Design WorkshopAccessible Elections Design Workshop
Accessible Elections Design Workshopbriandnewby
 
2009 Election Center Stars and Stripes Award Presentation
2009 Election Center Stars and Stripes Award Presentation2009 Election Center Stars and Stripes Award Presentation
2009 Election Center Stars and Stripes Award Presentationbriandnewby
 
Bocc Committee Of The Whole March 26, 2009
Bocc Committee Of The Whole March 26, 2009Bocc Committee Of The Whole March 26, 2009
Bocc Committee Of The Whole March 26, 2009briandnewby
 

Mais de briandnewby (20)

2015 Update
2015 Update2015 Update
2015 Update
 
Turnout
TurnoutTurnout
Turnout
 
Voting Equipment Considerations
Voting Equipment ConsiderationsVoting Equipment Considerations
Voting Equipment Considerations
 
Lock the Vote, Travis County
Lock the Vote, Travis CountyLock the Vote, Travis County
Lock the Vote, Travis County
 
November 2012 Canvass Sheets
November 2012 Canvass SheetsNovember 2012 Canvass Sheets
November 2012 Canvass Sheets
 
Ballotscanvass110612
Ballotscanvass110612Ballotscanvass110612
Ballotscanvass110612
 
National Republican Party Response to the Presidential Commission on Election...
National Republican Party Response to the Presidential Commission on Election...National Republican Party Response to the Presidential Commission on Election...
National Republican Party Response to the Presidential Commission on Election...
 
Implementing a Voting System From a Local Election Adminstrator's Viewpoint
Implementing a Voting System From a Local Election Adminstrator's ViewpointImplementing a Voting System From a Local Election Adminstrator's Viewpoint
Implementing a Voting System From a Local Election Adminstrator's Viewpoint
 
Election Management System Sample Reports
Election Management System Sample ReportsElection Management System Sample Reports
Election Management System Sample Reports
 
Election Management System Sample Reports
Election Management System Sample ReportsElection Management System Sample Reports
Election Management System Sample Reports
 
Johnson County Election Office's 2015 Capital Budget Submission for Next Gene...
Johnson County Election Office's 2015 Capital Budget Submission for Next Gene...Johnson County Election Office's 2015 Capital Budget Submission for Next Gene...
Johnson County Election Office's 2015 Capital Budget Submission for Next Gene...
 
Contingencies and Change Management, EAC Webinar, July 2013
Contingencies and Change Management, EAC Webinar, July 2013Contingencies and Change Management, EAC Webinar, July 2013
Contingencies and Change Management, EAC Webinar, July 2013
 
Contingencies and Change anagement
Contingencies and Change anagementContingencies and Change anagement
Contingencies and Change anagement
 
Merle King, Elections Administrators are IT Managers
Merle King, Elections Administrators are IT ManagersMerle King, Elections Administrators are IT Managers
Merle King, Elections Administrators are IT Managers
 
2012 ppp submission training with personas johnson county kansas
2012 ppp submission training with personas johnson county kansas2012 ppp submission training with personas johnson county kansas
2012 ppp submission training with personas johnson county kansas
 
Election 2012
Election 2012Election 2012
Election 2012
 
Budget cuts2
Budget cuts2Budget cuts2
Budget cuts2
 
Accessible Elections Design Workshop
Accessible Elections Design WorkshopAccessible Elections Design Workshop
Accessible Elections Design Workshop
 
2009 Election Center Stars and Stripes Award Presentation
2009 Election Center Stars and Stripes Award Presentation2009 Election Center Stars and Stripes Award Presentation
2009 Election Center Stars and Stripes Award Presentation
 
Bocc Committee Of The Whole March 26, 2009
Bocc Committee Of The Whole March 26, 2009Bocc Committee Of The Whole March 26, 2009
Bocc Committee Of The Whole March 26, 2009
 

Committee Of The Whole September 8 2011 Final Version

  • 1. Election 2012 Administrative Overview for BOCC Committee of the Whole Brian D. Newby Election Commissioner Johnson County, Kansas www.jocoelection.org http://my.jocopolo.com September 8, 2011
  • 2. Session Objectives Today’s meeting is intended to: • Provide a general update to issues impacting Johnson County elections. • Highlight specific administrative areas of note for 2012. • Assess readiness. • Be interactive and strategic—if we have great discussion but don’t get past this slide, the meeting likely would be more successful than if we complete the deck but don’t have that engagement. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 2
  • 3. Johnson County Election Office By The Numbers Staff Members:  Voters:  16 Full‐time  358,000 + Employees, up to  250 part‐time Voting  Precincts: 447 Locations: varies 150 Spring ‐ Voting  285 Presidential Machines:  2,407 Ballot  Advance Voting  Styles:  Locations: 4 Up to  1,461 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 3
  • 4. Johnson County Potential 800,000 Benefits Potential Drawbacks 744,059 700,000 644,559 600,000 550,904 500,000 451,086 400,000 355,054 463,333 411,191 270,269 300,000 360,000 312,788 200,000 100,000 155,769 173,570 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Population Active Voter Registration Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Johnson County Election Office, Mid-America Regional Council Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 4
  • 5. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 5
  • 6. Johnson County Elections, 2009 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 25 Spring Primary 26 Spring General 27 Roeland Pk Ward 4 28 Fairway 29 Merriam 30 2010 Spring Primary 31 2010 Spring General Regularly Scheduled Elections Special Elections Primary General Mail Ballot Polls Recall Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 6
  • 7. Johnson County Elections, 2010 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 29 Merriam 30 Spring Primary 31 Gardner Recall I 32 Gardner Recall II 33 Spring General 34 Primary Partisan 35 2010 General 36 City of De Soto 37 2011 Spring Primary 38 2011 Spring General Regularly Scheduled Elections Special Elections Primary General Mail Ballot Polls Recall Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 7
  • 8. Johnson County Elections, 2011 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 36 City of De Soto 37 2011 Spring Primary 38 2011 Spring General 39 Spring Hill School District 40 City of Mission 41 Blue Valley School District 42 Gardner School District 43 Roeland Park? Regularly Scheduled Elections Special Elections Primary General Mail Ballot Polls Recall Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 8
  • 9. Johnson County Elections, 2012 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 41 BV Schools 42 Gardner Sch 43 Roeland Park? 44 Spring Primary 45 Spring General 46 Primary Partisan 47 2012 Presidential 48 Spring General Regularly Scheduled Elections Special Elections Primary General Mail Ballot Polls Recall Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 9
  • 10. Johnson County, Kansas Est. Population 550,000 Registered Voters 358,592 Registered Voters 350,000 New Internet Party “Americans Elect” = 0 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 10
  • 11. Johnson County Voting Statistics Registered Voters Total Voted Turnout % Year JoCoPop Growth% November Growth% November Growth% November Trend 1960 143,792 77,420 65,033 84% 1964 177,137 23% 84,059 9% 72,483 11% 86% 2% 1968 212,245 20% 100,610 20% 88,314 22% 88% 2% 1972 231,933 9% 120,407 20% 104,136 18% 86% -1% 1976 243,953 5% 140,956 17% 117,040 12% 83% -3% 1980 266,489 9% 155,769 11% 125,637 7% 81% -2% 1984 283,666 6% 169,773 9% 141,715 13% 83% 3% 1988 328,537 16% 185,727 9% 155,267 10% 84% 1% 1992 374,801 14% 222,815 20% 197,265 27% 89% 5% 1996 411,635 10% 246,497 11% 192,202 -3% 78.0% -11% 2000 451,086 10% 312,788 27% 218,486 14% 70% -8% 2004 496,691 10% 348,552 11% 259,599 19% 75% 5% 2008 532,215 7% 364,441 5% 285,001 10% 78.2% 3% 2012 e 551,529 4% 390,000 7% 292,500 3% 75% -3% Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 11
  • 12. Voting is Local Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 12
  • 13. Legislative Changes Since 2008 • Secure And Fair Elections (SAFE) Act • Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act • Full ballot for overseas voters • Changes in Canvass dates Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 13
  • 14. Key Legislative Outcomes: 1. There will be no presidential preference primary in 2012. Parties will conduct caucuses. 2. Beginning in 2012, every voter must show photo identification each time they vote. 3. By-mail advance voters who ask other people to mail or deliver their ballots must designate the delivery persons in writing. 4. Beginning in 2013, individuals must provide proof of U.S. citizenship when they register to vote for the first time in Kansas. 5. The candidate filing deadline in even-year elections is moved from noon on June 10 to noon on June 1. 6. In the redistricting year of 2012, the candidate filing deadline may be June 1, June 10 or, if there is litigation, a date set by a court. 7. The voter registration deadline for all elections is moved from the 15th day to the 21st day before the election. 8. The county canvass is held either on Monday or the second Thursday following the election, rather than Friday or Monday. 9. The deadline to request a single-district recount in a specific county is 5:00 pm the day following the county canvass. Once requested, recounts must be completed in 5 calendar days. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 14
  • 15. Even More Legislative Outcomes: 1. Uniformed and Overseas Citizen Access Voting Abroad (UOCAVA) voters now vote a complete ballot, with all the races and issues that regular ballots contain. 2. UOCAVA voters must submit ballot applications annually instead of once every two years. 3. In local elections held in the spring of odd-numbered years, a primary is held if more than 3 candidates file for an office, and the two candidates receiving the most votes in the primary move on to the general election. 4. Candidates for state offices file their campaign finance reports only with the Secretary of State, not with the county election officer. 5. Candidates may not appear in advertisements or public service announcements within 60 days of a primary election, extending until the general election is over. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 15
  • 16. Federal Service Voters Growth in Federal Service Ballots  2000 Ballots Issued 1500 1515 1165 1000 530 500 0 2000 2004 2008 Presidential Elections Literally, each of these voters (who vote using procedures from the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act—UOCAVA) requires the involvement of a staff member to ensure ballots are received and returned. It would be the equivalent of one sales person managing the Fortune 1500 companies. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 16
  • 17. Census Impacts The Chief Election Officer is each county’s point person for the census: • Redistricting will move voters from different congressional, senate, and state legislative districts. • This redistricting may not be completed until late spring, leaving a crunch mode to move voters, create new maps, and process candidate filings in early June. • Potential for Spanish ballots comes from the census and we should know the outcome of that within a month: Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 mandates that a state or political subdivision must provide language assistance to voters if more than 5 percent of the voting age citizens are members of a single- language minority group or if more than 10,000 of the voting age citizens are members of a single-language minority group. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 17
  • 18. Area Closings Will Impact 2012 More than 50,000 voters cast ballots by mail in 2008. 40,000 ballots were mailed out 20 days before election day, the first day they could be mailed by law. • In 2012, the downtown Olathe Post Office will be closed, adding more complexity to our mail processing. • Further, the U.S. Postal Service is nearing default on its financial obligations, which will trigger Congressional action. It’s possible service on one or more days will eventually end, making voting by mail, potentially, unviable in the long-term. • Similarly, the election office now has only one newspaper for the many statutorily required publications following the closing of the Johnson County Sun. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 18
  • 19. Other Uncertainties The Election Office is required to serve as an advance voting location. • Others used in 2008 may not be available (Metcalf South or Shawnee) or viable (Northeast Offices) in 2012. • It’s too early to negotiate with landlords for alternate sites because there is optimism on their part that space will be filled. Negotiations are resource- intensive. • We’ve had a civic-minded lease with Metcalf South but other locations cost $5,000 per month or more. Leases are for 5 months. • Similarly, polling places must be assigned this fall and polling places are difficult to obtain, making advance voting vital. Without advance voting, we would need 450 polling locations and at least 800 more voting machines. • Like all Johnson County employees, election workers have felt the economy’s impacts. They have not had an increase since 2006, although they will work a 15-hour day in November 2012. (Polls are open an hour longer in presidential elections). By law, election worker pay is set by the BOCC. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 19
  • 20. Advance Voting—2008 Presidential 50 percent of voters voted in advance. The distribution results in three distinct elections—in person advance, advance by mail, and in-person at the polls. In-Person Advance 86,020 By-Mail Advance 55,585 In-Person Election Day 143,396 Total 285,001* *--provisional votes distributed proportionately to election night totals (In-Person Election Day) (In-Person Advance) (By-Mail Advance) Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 20
  • 21. Advance Voting Almost half of Johnson County’s in-person advance totals were from non-county owned locations. In-Person Johnson County Election Office 29,695 In-Person Metcalf South 22,883 In-Person Shawnee 18,025 In-Person Johnson County Northeast Office 15,417 Total 86,020 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 21
  • 22. Polling Place Layout and Flow Perfect Voter votes and exits machine Voting Provisional machine booth Voting machine Perfect Voter returns deactivated Voter Card to container and receives Election worker EW admits Perfect “I Voted” sticker Voter to voting EW machine and Perfect Voter receives confirms precinct Voter plastic Voter Card split & party Perfect Voter affiliation (in enters here encoded according to Voting receives Voter partisan election) Receipt receipt machine Voter checks in Encoder machine Voting machine Advance voting is similar, except that computers are connected to the statewide voter registration system. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 22
  • 23. Citizen Satisfaction Even with the same number of full-time staff as in 1996, Elections ranks well in the county’s citizen survey. Satisfaction levels have been similar in the 2005, 2007, and 2009 surveys. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 23
  • 24. Human Capital Issues Johnson-Wyandotte Election Office Comparison Registered Voters 2011 Voters served per staff Average Salary (2008) National average of voters served per full-time employee is 6,000, according to the National Association of Election Officials Wyandotte  County Johnson County 22,412 $53,824 Johnson  Johnson County County 358k $47,063 Wyandotte County 11,497 Wyandotte County 80k Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 24
  • 25. Election Workers Johnson County Election Workers • Minimum of 3 per polling location by law. • Average of 6 per polling place in 2012. • Must, if possible, have one representative from each party. • Must be a registered voter in the county and, if possible, live in the precinct. • Requests are made to each party for workers. • Students (less than 18 but 16 or older) can work as election workers, one per polling location. • 10 percent of our workers are high-school students. • Average age of election workers is 68. • Average tenure of election workers in the 2012 election will be six years. • Workers are generally needed in the outlying areas—Gardner, Edgerton, De Soto, Spring Hill, and Stilwell. • County employees from 19 departments have served as election workers. • Workers train for 3 hours before each election; supervising judges receive a second training just for that function. • Workers provide their own transportation and meals. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 25
  • 26. Freedom Isn’t Free… …But In Johnson County, It Almost Is Of the 284 polling places Johnson County utilized in 2008: Total polling place rent, Aug. and Nov. 50 Paid 2008, estimated: $5,000 234 Free • Johnson County’s Election Office was able to negotiate $2,000 in total rent at Metcalf South for advance voting in August and November 2006. • 2008 rent for two sites was $30,000. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 26
  • 27. Polling Places by the Numbers Johnson County Polling Places and Registered Voters Presidential Elections 1996 - 2008 350 400,000 360,000 348,552 300 350,000 312,788 300,000 250 246,497 1,267 Registered Voters 1,219  Voters per 250,000 Polling Places 1,208 Voters per Polling Place 200 1,086  Voters per Polling Place Voters per Polling Place 200,000 Polling Place 150 150,000 100 100,000 50 50,000 227 259 286 284 0 0 1996 2000 2004 2008 Brian D. Newby, November 29, 2007 27
  • 28. Voting Technology Johnson County has used voting machines for more than 40 years, since 1966. • Voters authorized the county to purchase voting machines. • For most under the age of 65, voting on machine, rather than paper, has been the method of voting the entire time they have voted in Johnson County. 2001 • Johnson County moved to touch-screen voting First Version, generation machines in 2001 and implemented them in 2002. machine Diebold TS • These machines were bought from Global Election Systems, a company acquired by Diebold shortly after Johnson County’s 2001 equipment purchase. • Essentially, these machines are using 1990s touch-screen technology (four- wire resistive): Smartphones and tablet computers like iPhones and iPads weren’t invented yet when these machines were designed. These new devices use much more advanced touch-screen technology. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 28
  • 29. History of Voting Technology Johnson County is utilizing its second generation of DRE Touch-Screen Machines. • Older TS machines were replaced by TSX machines. • 300 TS machines were retained as encoders (one per polling place, prepares ballot on voter card) until 2008. • TSx machines utilized as encoders beginning in 2008. • Diebold renamed election division “Premier” in 2007 and sold Premier to Election Systems and Software (ES&S) in 2009. • Department of Justice sued Election Systems and Software in 2010, resulting in divestiture of intellectual property of Premier’s recently certified software to Dominion Voting Systems. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 29
  • 30. History of Voting Technology What this means to Johnson County: • TSx machines are no longer being manufactured. • Johnson County does not pay the $100,000 annual maintenance contract on the TSx machines. • Johnson County is in a unique position where it could be supported by ES&S or Dominion. However, because much of what we do is autonomous, without vendor involvement, this position is less impactful than it could be. If we move to the new certified software on these machines, however, we must do that with Dominion. • In 2012, machines will be 9 years old, with estimated life of 7 to 10 years. (TS machine parts began failing within 5 years). Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 30
  • 31. Touch-Screen Voting Timeline 2001 • TS Units put into  service • Express Polls  •Johnson County  delivered, but not yet  Purchases 860 TS Units  certified for use and 300 Express Polls  (electronic poll  books/encoders) 2002 TS Unit 2004 •California Decertifies voting machines without Voter  Verifiable Paper Audit Trail •Johnson County trades up, replacing its 860 machines  for new and used TSX machines (from California),  bringing the fleet to 1,305 Express Poll Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 31
  • 32. Touch-Screen Voting Timeline 2005 • Johnson County  orders 576 additional  TSx machines with  •Express Polls certified dollars from the Help  •Boxes opened; order not  America Vote Act.  complete •Statewide voter  registration/election  management system is  2006 TSx Unit successfully implemented 2007 •Express Polls not accepted because the technology is outdated. •300 TS machines returned to Diebold •576 TSx machines ordered in 2006 delivered and accepted (there was no  warehouse space for the new machines until the TS machines were sent back) Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 32
  • 33. Touch-Screen Voting Timeline 2008 •125 machines are purchased from Diebold/Premier.  TSx machines used as encoders. 2011 •400 purchased from ES&S, putting fleet at 2406. •Election office does not have the capability to store or power additional machines. •Table retrofit is underway to allow space for these new units in our warehouse 2017 •Spring election would be the absolute drop‐dead date for the lifespan of this system to  be exhausted. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 33
  • 34. Voting Technology During the next election cycle, the Election Office will post videos on YouTube to demonstrate the method of calibrating and testing voting machines. This sign also appears at our polling locations. Please Note  Touch screens on voting machines are sensitive.  You must retouch a wrong selection to cancel it before making another selection.  Carefully review your choices on the summary page prior to casting your ballot. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 34
  • 35. Audit Trail Johnson County’s voting machines have an audit trail consistent with the Help America Vote Act, as well as Kansas Secretary of State and voluntary voting guidelines. • Do they have a paper trail? Yes. Ballots cast can be and have been printed for recounts. Ballots are stored, with voter privacy, on the machine’s hard drive and on a removable drive. • Do they have a paper trail with a printer on the side? No. This is often referred to as a Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT). This capability was invented after Johnson County’s machines were built. The lack of VVPAT was why the machines were de-certified in California. Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach would prefer all systems have a formal paper trail (VVPAT or paper ballots). Upgrading to VVPAT capability with Johnson County’s current system is not an option. The machines could be upgraded with new software, from Dominion, at a cost estimate of approximately $1.8 million. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 35
  • 36. Machine Security The Johnson County Election Office is staffed by 16 sworn election professionals who adhere to The Election Center’s Code of Ethics, which was adopted by our office in 1997. • The Election Office full-time staff manages all aspects of elections for residents of Johnson County. • The staff is responsible for programming, verifying, tabulating, and controlling every election. • We utilize seasoned election workers to conduct all of our pre-election testing. • The vendor has never programmed our elections and does not have remote access to our election software. • We control our own elections—no outside entity is involved in programming or election-day support. Our office building, located at 2101 E. Kansas City Road in Olathe, has controlled access and is secured through an alarm system with a numbered lock and password-protected entrance keypad. • Within the building there are numerous rooms with different levels of controlled access. • The election computer room and the ballot storage vault are monitored by security cameras 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. • Combination lock passwords are changed after each election cycle. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 36
  • 37. Machine Security (cont.) The election software computer is freestanding. It is not networked within the office or connected to the Internet. 1. Physically, the vendor’s election software and each individual election database are secured on a computer that is accessible by few members of our office staff only. 2. This computer is installed in a secure room with controlled access. One staff member has a key to enter the room, but the room requires a code as well from another staff member. Thus, 2 persons are in the room, at a minimum, at any time. 3. A video camera also records all activity in this room. 4. The computer requires a password, which only one employee knows. The specific election requires a different password, again known by only one employee. 5. Individual election database files are backed up at designated milestones and secured in the tabulation room and in off-site storage. 6. All voting machine keys, voter cards, and storage media are secured in a controlled access room. Staff maintains a detailed inventory control of these supplies. 7. Keys and combinations are assigned so that any election-centric procedure requires at least two persons. 8. On Election Night, our election results are hand-carried by election judges to election headquarters. 9. We do not use modems to transmit results. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 37
  • 38. 7:30 11:30 Polling Place (285) Results 11:00 PC Card Server Results 8:00 Drop- Off Site (20) Upload PC Card PC Card PC Card (2,200) 8:40 Election Office PC CardPC Card PC Card Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 38
  • 39. Election Setup The Johnson County Election Office may use only voting systems, equipment and software certified through the Kansas Secretary of State’s Office. A voting system must pass three levels of tests before it can be used in Kansas - Federal Qualification Tests, State Certification Tests, and local Acceptance Tests. Our policy has been to receive software updates directly from the Independent Testing Authority that certified the software. 1. Before each election our office conducts a Systems Diagnostic Test on each voting machine to ensure that it is operating properly. 2. Logic and Accuracy (L&A) Tests are performed on each election data card. In addition, an L&A is done to test the integration of the voting machine data cards with the paper ballot system. 3. This L&A assures the accuracy of the entire process for every election – merging of paper ballot and machine votes to expected hand-calculated outcomes, including a review of all reports. 4. Throughout the entire testing process there is an internal separation of duties and dual sign-off accountability on all processes—maintaining an extensive audit trail, including all proofing documentation. 5. Tabulation effectiveness is demonstrated through a public test, with notice published by law and verified again post-election. 6. Each voting machine is secured with a unique padlock and key combination. 7. Data cards for the voting machines are secured at the Election Office until the afternoon before the election, when they are picked up in a numbered, sealed pouch by the Supervising Judge of each polling place. 8. On Election Day, poll workers confirm the seal numbers on PC card pouches and voting machines, then verify protective counters before inserting PC cards into voting machines to activate the election. This validation is signed by all sworn election workers. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 39
  • 40. Election Day Each polling place in our county is staffed by sworn election workers, who have attended a mandatory training session during each election cycle. 1. The Supervising Judge is responsible for balancing the number of voters processed to votes collected periodically throughout the day. On election day, the Supervising Judge maintains control of all machine keys. 2. There are numerous checks and balances in place, including separation of duties as each voter moves through the polling place. 3. A beginning “zero proof” printout from each voting machine validates that there are no votes stored on the results cartridges. This printout is signed by all sworn election workers. 4. An individual voter receipt is issued to each voter at check-in. A voter must present a voter receipt in order to be issued a voting machine activation card. 5. An activation card is not issued until a voting machine is available for use. 6. Each voter is escorted to a voting machine by a Machine Attendant. The Machine Attendant used the voter receipt to validate that the correct ballot is displayed for the voter. 7. The voter receipt is deposited in an envelope at the voting machine, providing a paper audit trail for the number of votes collected in each voting machine. The voter receipt is comparable to a paper ballot stub. 8. The voter cards are collected at the exit door by an election worker. 9. An end-of-day tally includes balancing voters processed to votes collected, and validating that the numbers of voter cards issued to the polling place are being returned to the Election Office. 10. A closing printout from each voting machine confirms the total number of votes collected in each machine. This printout is again signed by all sworn election workers. 11. The election results data cards, again secured in a numbered, sealed pouch, are hand-carried by election judges to the Election Office, where the votes are tabulated. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 40
  • 41. Further Security Concerns Despite the focus on security, more investment could be made: 1. We have outsourced a security audit and received a proposal that we are reviewing internally and with facilities, which has, itself, conducted a security audit. 2. Likely, proposals will be brought to the BOCC for additional spending on cameras and fencing. 3. Aside from election security, a risk exists from the hacking industry—not of voting machines but of other county systems that could impact voter confidence: 1. For instance, a hacker who could reach the elections website—stored at the county—could cause voters to wonder if others systems were impacted. 2. Four election office websites have been hacked since July 2011. 3. Election and website systems are unrelated and unassociated, and the ITS group understands the concern, but this is a security issue outside of the control of the Election Office. 4. Any issue “outside of the control of the Election Office,” could still cause voters to wonder how much control our office actually has over voting security. 5. While we have great control over election security, mitigating effects of any unrelated outside force is something of which we are continually mindful. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 41
  • 42. These individuals have become celebrated election hactivists, having hacked a District of Columbia Internet election trial (by invitation). They have obtained a TSx machine and sponsored a hacking election on the machine at a national conference. Example of a high-profile hactivist, 2006
  • 43. Next Generation Voting Certification to the 2012 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (under development) requires the use of paper: • Machines with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail • Paper ballots • Devices which print paper $13 million is considered the high side for the most expensive solution—Machines with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail. Johnson County will need to consider a total cost solution (capital and operating costs) when developing and evaluating its Request for Proposal. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 43
  • 44. History of Voting Technology New systems must: • Be federally certified by the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) • Comply with the EAC’s 2008 Voluntary Voting Systems Guidelines • Be certified in the state of Kansas Currently, no system meets this criteria. Internet voting likewise does not meet this criteria. Internet voting has security risks but is the centerpiece of the MOVE Act. If Internet voting becomes successful with military voters, the industry likely will be pulled to this technology. Another backdrop to these issues is the role of the EAC, empowered by the Help America Vote Act. Many--including the National Association of Secretaries of State, the current Kansas Secretary of State, and the Johnson County Election Commissioner—believe the EAC has outlived its role and should be abolished or blended into other agencies. This would place more emphasis on Kansas certification and may allow for more innovation and, definitely, reduced costs. A bill to abolish the EAC was introduced in the House of Representatives but did not gain the votes needed to advance to the Senate. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 44
  • 45. Elections as Public Policy The equipment issues facing Johnson County are not solely Retrofit Fleet of 1,881 TSx Machines election issues. They are public policy issues that require the same consideration by the Board of County Commissioners as other service levels with other agencies. Considerations of any equipment decisions • How will service levels be changed now? • Will any change limit our service level options in the future? Put Machines on Ice, Go Paper • What is the possibility of stranded investment? • What is the possibility of federal or state funding? • Will action now limit or prevent cost recovery from federal or state sources? Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 45
  • 46. So Why Not Go Back to Paper? This question is often asked by voters. “Back to Paper” has an impractical romantic quality. Perception Reality • Less susceptible to fraud. • The potential for fraud is what drove the use of voting machines. Voter intent questions come to the forefront, leaving more elections decided by courts and governing bodies. • Elections are cheaper. • Few ballot printing vendors, use of natural resources, and transportation costs of heavy items, along with human resources, make this significantly more operationally expensive. • We can hand-count the votes. • In a small recount, hand-counting is accurate, but in large elections with several races, hand- counting is not accurate, and it is very time- intensive. • People can wait a few days for results. • We live in a 10 o’clock news society. Voter and candidate expectations are that most or all results will be available by the nightly news. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 46
  • 47. So Why Not Go Back to Paper? • Johnson County prints ballots in each ballot style to prepare for power outages, provisional voters, advance voting by mail, and persons who request paper. Ballot orders are placed months before an election with our ballot printer in Washington state— few vendors, and none locally, exist that can meet our printing needs. • A large number of unused ballots, because of the myriad of styles printed, are destroyed, leading to a waste of money but perhaps a chance to repurpose dollars towards ballot-on- demand printing and back-up power capabilities at the Election Office, reducing the chance for a large number of provisional ballots if power were lost during a mandatory advance voting period. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 47
  • 48. Paper Use Since 2004 Printed Used Blank Ballots Disposed Cost* 2004 692,485 247,071 435,414 $174,166 2006 387,965 46,555 341,410 $136,564 2008 426,860 90,481 336,379 $134,552 2010 316,570 72,026 244,544 $ 97,818 Notes: *--assumes $0.40 printing costs per ballot, numbers are rounded • Each year represents August and November elections only. Ballots are printed for each election. • 2004’s presidential election was a 2-page ballot. • While the current election ballot delivery model requires the printing of more ballots than necessary, these dollars represent a strategic opportunity to perhaps repurpose dollars towards another model, such as ballot on demand printing or vote centers. • These costs represent printing only—other costs include storage and labor Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 48
  • 49. Vote Center Defined • Colorado was the first to implement Vote Centers, in 2003. • A Vote Center is very much like an Advance Voting site – the voter can live anywhere within the county and vote at any voting center. • Difference is that it can be done on Election Day, too, rather than just Early Voting period. • A single Vote Center does not have the same operational efficiency of an Advance Voting site, simply because the Vote Center is generally a Super Polling Place on Election Day only, although Advance Voting sites could be used as Vote Centers. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 49
  • 50. Vote Center Considerations Drivers Restrainers • Polling locations are easier to locate. • Fewer locations available that meet the requirements (large parking, available • Any registered voter within the space, etc.). county can vote at any center without having to return to their own • Significant (unbudgeted) staff neighborhood polling place. resources needed to negotiate leases. • Sites must be networked together. • Fewer provisional ballots because voters can vote anywhere in the • All paper ballots would have to be sent county. to each site (as many as 1,500 types in Johnson County) for provisional and • Fewer additional voting machines paper voters or printed on demand. needed as the community grows. • Physical security of locations. • Fewer election workers needed, approximately 25 percent less. • Greater chance of voter receiving the incorrect ballot. • Fewer locations need to be obtained. • Voter complaints that the local site has • Sites could be open through the closed, making it harder for them to weekend before, blending advance vote. voting with Vote Centers. • Rent cost could be prohibitive.
  • 51. Advance Voting Benefits In-person advance voting creates a better voting experience that could be leveraged in the Vote Center concept: • Voter convenience—allows voters to vote on their terms. • Election workers are more seasoned—working daily instead of two or three times a year. • Voting machine utilization reduces the county’s overall capital investment. November 2008 Machine Utilization Percentage Each advance voting site reduced the need for 40 polling places and 200 voting machines. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 51
  • 52. 2008 Physical Capital Issues Overhangs to the dock doors were never replaced; equipment becomes wet when loaded in the rain. Employees park in the grass and mud, arriving and leaving in the dark. This is the secure ballot drop box that was inadequate in 2008. One of many areas in need of repair in the parking lot. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 52
  • 53. Further Building Issues • Likely, the Election Office facility will be completely out of space by 2014. • The office must be open, by law, for advance voting. • One way or another, more equipment will be needed by 2016, even if the additional equipment obtained are laptops to check-in voters and extend the life of the voting machines. • There is no room to store and fulfill the additional paper ballots expected because of new precincts and parties. • Warehouse restrooms are not ADA-compliant. • The facility is extremely vulnerable in the event of power failure, which could delay election results or result in thousands of provisional ballots. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 53
  • 54. Election Laws/Regulations Elections fall under federal and state oversight: • National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) governs list maintenance activities • Help America Vote Act (HAVA) governs election administration • State statutes detail election requirements • Secretary of State Standards clarify and enhance state requirements Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 54
  • 55. Voter Registration Requirements Current Requirements to register to vote: United States Citizen Resident of the State of Kansas and the County listed on the registration 18 years of age or older by the date of the next election Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 55
  • 56. Election Office Responsibilities The Election Office is responsible for conducting a program that makes a reasonable effort to remove names of registrants who have:  Died  Moved to another County or State  Inactive voters removed for failure to vote in two consecutive federal general elections  Requested to be removed  Are no longer eligible to vote 56
  • 57. Election Office Responsibilities 1) Mail two notices non-forwardable first class mail 2) Transfer of voters to “inactive” status - Maintain for two full federal election cycles (4 years) - Or through the second general election for federal office following the date the voter was transferred to inactive. When we conduct a full voter mailing we get thousands of mail pieces to verify. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 57
  • 58. Voter Registration Process Complete = Registered Incomplete information = Rejected Incomplete  Information=  Suspense Registrant is sent a letter requesting the additional information that is  necessary to complete their registration.  If the registrant  If the registrant does  provides that  not provide that  information=  information Registered.   Not Registered.
  • 59. Mass Mailing Process OFFICE OF THE KANSAS SECRETARY OF STATE NCOA / MASS MAILING / CROSSCHECK  RESULTS 1. Receive evidence of a  2. Receive evidence of a  3. Receive response from post  move within the county. move out of the county.  office saying “undeliverable” or “no  forwarding address”. Send forwardable confirmation  Send forwardable  mailing to address on file and  Update the registrant’s  confirmation mailing to  make voter record “Inactive”.  record with the new  new address and make  address. voter record “Inactive”. Do  not update the  registrant’s record yet. Response from voter. Send forwardable  No response – Must fail to  confirmation mailing to new  vote and have no contact  address. until after second  consecutive federal  Voter responds with  Voter responds with  Voter confirms  general election, then  no change to record.  move in county,  move out of  cancel voter registration. Remove “Inactive”  update address and  county, cancel  designation. remove “Inactive”  voter’s  designation. registration. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 59
  • 60. Poll Books and Voter History •When a voter signs in the  Signature Roster on Election Day,  voting history is updated.   •The poll books are scanned in the  days following the election to  update that the voter voted.  •If the voter is inactive this will  restore the registration and the  voter will become an active voter. •If the inactive voter does not  vote, then the voter is removed  from the voter file after the proper  time has elapsed.  Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 60
  • 61. Registration Systems • Johnson County co-developed and purchased a voter registration and election management system in 1997. • This system was selected as the same system to be used for the statewide voter registration system, required by the Help America Vote Act. • Before implementation, in early 2005, the vendor of this system and the Secretary of State’s office terminated these plans, leading to a new selection process and a new vendor, ES&S. ES&S is contracted with the Secretary of State’s office. • Johnson County pays approximately $40,000 annually for user security tokens to the Secretary of State’s office. The system’s primary missive is to securely process and maintain Kansas voter registration records. • The system was envisioned as an election management system (ballot design, reporting, and scheduling of workers and supplies) but it hasn’t yet fulfilled this vision, leaving Johnson County to operate two systems (including the now-unsupported legacy 1997 system). • Replacement of this legacy system would cost approximately $100,000 likely will be necessary unless the state system capabilities are enhanced. While there are plans to enhance the system, there are limitations that have delayed this expectation. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 61
  • 62. Voter Investment Issues • Johnson County has arguably the most engaged voters in the nation. These voters have high expectations and their utilization of the Election Office supports those expectations be met. • In 2008, the BOCC approved nearly $230,000 of an approximate $320,000 request for outreach. The Election Office recognized this was the highest amount ever allocated for any outreach project (not just elections) by the BOCC. • Outreach efforts contributed to a reduction in provisional ballots in 2008. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 62
  • 63. Key Metrics 2/3 of Johnson County  Voters Would Have a  Different Polling Place in  2008 Than in 2004 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 63
  • 64. Key Metrics 2004 2008 Polling 286 284 Places 11,301 Provisional Ballots “Lost Voter” Provisionals Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 64
  • 65. Key Metrics 2004 2008 Polling 286 284 Places 11,301 Provisional Ballots “Lost Voter” 4,267 Provisionals Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 65
  • 66. Key Metrics 2004 2008 286 These would be Polling 284 Places expected to 11,301 Provisional increase as Ballots “Lostturnout Voter” 4,267 Provisionals increased. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 66
  • 67. Key Metrics 2004 2008 74.5% Turnout 37.8% Advance Percentage Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 67
  • 68. Key Metrics 2004 2008 74.5% Turnout 78.3% 37.8% Advance Percentage Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 68
  • 69. Key Metrics 2004 2008 74.5% Turnout 78.3% 37.8% Advance 49.3% Percentage Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 69
  • 70. Key Metrics 2004 2008 Polling 286 284 Places 11,301 Provisional Ballots “Lost Voter” Provisionals Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 70
  • 71. Key Metrics 2004 2008 Polling 286 284 Places 11,301 Provisional 8,198 Ballots “Lost Voter” Provisionals Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 71
  • 72. Key Metrics 2004 2008 Polling 286 284 Places 11,301 Provisional 8,198 Ballots “Lost Voter” 4,267 Provisionals Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 72
  • 73. Key Metrics 2004 2008 Polling 286 284 Places 11,301 Provisional 8,198 Ballots “Lost Voter” 4,267 Provisionals Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 73
  • 74. Key Metrics 2004 2008 Polling 286 284 Places 11,301 Provisional 8,198 Ballots “Lost Voter” 4,267 668 Provisionals Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 74
  • 75. Communications Components The Election Office had an exhaustive campaign involving the following components, with an initial push focused on the August election. Engage Local Business Develop Baseline Materials Partnerships Utilize Public Relations Leverage County Resources Opportunities Leverage City/Civic Resources Utilize Strategic Media Placement • Approved dollars by the BOCC for $229,725 came to 64 cents per voter. • There is no similar effort budgeted for 2012. Without a campaign, provisional ballots are likely to move back towards 2004 levels. 75 Brian D. Newby, November 29, 2007
  • 76. Message Johnson County voters were consistently be reminded that: • Advance voting is more convenient than ever and can be done in person or by mail. • Polling places change for each election. • Voters should check their location before heading to the polls. • There will be lines at the polling places throughout the day, especially first thing in the morning. THIS IS STILL THE PRIMARY MESSAGE. Outreach efforts in this document are focused on these specific messages. Other messages and targets (such as encouraging young adults to register) are important but beyond the scope of this particular campaign. Brian D. Newby, November 29, 2007 76
  • 77. 2008 Outreach Approach JoCoPoLo and “Express Lane” Public Awareness Campaign and Outreach Program to promote Election Day polling locations and Early Voting Options. Brian D. Newby September 8, 2011 64
  • 78. Jo-Co Po-Lo www.jocopolo.com Johnson County Election Office
  • 79. Jo-Co Po-Lo www.jocopolo.com Johnson County Election Office
  • 80. Jo-Co Po-Lo www.jocopolo.com Johnson County Election Office
  • 81.
  • 82.
  • 83. Website/Phone Calls October phone call volume was similar in 2008 and 2004, but phone calls on election day in 2008 were 3,600 less than in 2004, suggesting an impact from advance voting and outreach efforts. The two websites had more than one million unique visits, Oct. 3-Nov. 6 Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 70
  • 84. Components of Outreach JoCoPoLo van, Democracy Posse, and “JP” Voter types in VOTEKS and address to short code Response Received within 60 Seconds Democracy Posse Johnson County Election Office 4 4
  • 85. Canvass Board of County Canvassers conduct the canvass based on BOCC policy. • Election Commissioner is the facilitator of the process. • Provisional ballots are determined by the Special Elections Board, appointed by the Election Commissioner but not staff members. These persons represent a similar composition to a polling place election board or advance voting board. • Elections staff research and categorize provisional ballots for the canvass meeting. • Board of Canvassers in some counties actually adjudicate each provisional ballot—and could in Johnson County, but it would require an extensive time commitment by the BOCC members over a period of several days beginning the Wednesday after the election. • In November 2012, Board of Canvassers, or their alternates, should prepare to be available the full week after the election. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 85
  • 86. Provisional Timeline Ballots received after 7 p.m. are considered  late and not  Provisional  provisional.  They are  ballots can be  stored separately for  mailed.  review if necessary. 20 Days before Election Day 19 Days before Election Day Tuesday, Election Day Tuesday, 11 p.m. Research of  Election night provisional ballot  voted ballots as  bags are checked in to confirm  they are received  all have been accounted for and  in the mail begins  locked in secure room.  Ballot  by staff. bags remain sealed overnight. Brian D. Newby, April 28, 2011 86
  • 87. Provisional Timeline Provisional envelopes begin to  be sorted by general categories  Ballot bags are opened and  for research.  Research follows  emptied.  Ballots in each bag  a checklist to determine if the  are counted and reconciled  voter is eligible to vote and if  against the green sign‐in  the voter has already cast a  sheet. ballot. Wednesday,  8 a.m. Wednesday,  9 a.m. Wednesday, 11 a.m. Provisional envelopes are moved to the “E” Room.   Counts by EP Code, if necessary to know the number of  provisional ballots in close races, are recorded.  Brian D. Newby, April 28, 2011 87
  • 88. Provisional Timeline Researching of  envelopes  Research  continues. continues on  envelopes. Thursday, 8 a.m. Thursday, 2 p.m. Friday, 8 a.m. Canvass summary sheets are drafted.  Sheets summarize categories  that by law ballots are recommended to be counted and  recommended not to be counted.  Envelopes simply containing ballots  that were cast on paper, but not provisional, are reviewed and held to  be tabulated during the canvass recess the following Monday. Brian D. Newby, April 28, 2011 88
  • 89. Provisional Timeline Research continues on envelopes.  Envelopes recommended to be processed and those  recommended not to be processed are stored separately and  tagged appropriately. Canvass summary sheets are completed and totals are  proofed. Saturday,  8 a.m. Sunday, 8 a.m. Monday, 9 a.m. Research  Board of County Canvassers convene.  The Board recesses  continues on  while those envelopes recommended to be processed are  envelopes. taken to the E Room and are worked by the Special Board.   Results are tabulated for final results and certification by  the Board of County Canvassers. Brian D. Newby, April 28, 2011 89
  • 90. Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted” 2004 2006 2008 Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage 2004 of Total 2006 of Total 2008 of Total Counted Counted Counted Name, Address 360 4.7% 1,740 45.6% 2,117 40.1% Change, Correct Polling Place Name, Address 4,267 55.1% 432 11.3% 668 12.7% Change, Incorrect Polling Place Mailed Advance 585 7.6% 539 14.2% 1,836 34.8% Ballot, Voted at the Polls Total Counted 7,738 3,810 5,280 Percentage 3.0 2.0 1.9 of Total Votes Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 90
  • 91. Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted” 2010 2012 2014 Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage 2010 of Total 2012 of Total 2014 of Total Counted Counted Counted Name, Address 1,101 45.6% Change, Correct Polling Place Name, Address 224 9.3% Change, Incorrect Polling Place Mailed Advance 932 38.6% Ballot, Voted at the Polls Total Counted 2,416 Percentage 1.3 of Total Votes Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 91
  • 92. Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted” 2004 2006 2008 Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage 2004 of Total 2006 of Total 2008 of Total Counted Counted Counted Name, Address 360 4.7% 1,740 45.6% 2,117 40.1% Change, Correct Polling Place Name, Address 4,267 55.1% 432 11.3% 668 12.7% Change, Incorrect Polling Place Mailed Advance 585 7.6% 539 14.2% 1,836 34.8% Ballot, Voted at the Polls Total Counted 7,738 3,810 5,280 Percentage 3.0 2.0 1.9 of Total Votes Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 92
  • 93. Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted” 2004 2006 2008 Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage 2004 of Total 2006 of Total 2008 of Total Counted Counted Counted Name, Address 360 4.7% 1,740 45.6% 2,117 40.1% Change, Correct Polling Place Name, Address 4,267 55.1% 432 11.3% 668 12.7% Change, Incorrect Polling Place Mailed Advance 585 7.6% 539 14.2% 1,836 34.8% Ballot, Voted at the Polls Total Counted 7,738 3,810 5,280 Percentage 3.0 2.0 1.9 of Total Votes Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 93
  • 94. Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted” 2004 2006 2008 Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage 2004 of Total 2006 of Total 2008 of Total Counted Counted Counted Name, Address 360 4.7% 1,740 45.6% 2,117 40.1% Change, Correct Polling Place Name, Address 4,267 55.1% 432 11.3% 668 12.7% Change, Incorrect Polling Place Mailed Advance 585 7.6% 539 14.2% 1,836 34.8% Ballot, Voted at the Polls Total Counted 7,738 3,810 5,280 Percentage 3.0 2.0 1.9 of Total Votes Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 94
  • 95. Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted” 2004 2006 2008 Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage 2004 of Total 2006 of Total 2008 of Total Counted Counted Counted Name, Address 360 4.7% 1,740 45.6% 2,117 40.1% Change, Correct Polling Place Name, Address 4,267 55.1% 432 11.3% 668 12.7% Change, Incorrect Polling Place Mailed Advance 585 7.6% 539 14.2% 1,836 34.8% Ballot, Voted at the Polls Total Counted 7,738 3,810 5,280 Percentage 3.0 2.0 1.9 of Total Votes Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 95
  • 96. Provisional Ballot Metrics “Counted” 2004 2006 2008 Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage 2004 of Total 2006 of Total 2008 of Total Counted Counted Counted Name, Address 360 4.7% 1,740 45.6% 2,117 40.1% Change, Correct Polling Place Name, Address 4,267 55.1% 432 11.3% 668 12.7% Change, Incorrect Polling Place Mailed Advance 585 7.6% 539 14.2% 1,836 34.8% Ballot, Voted at the Polls Total Counted 7,738 3,810 5,280 Percentage 3.0 2.0 1.9 of Total Votes Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 96
  • 97. Provisional Ballot Metrics “Not Counted” 2004 2006 2008 Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage 2004 of Total Not 2006 of Total Not 2008 of Total Not Counted Counted Counted Not Registered 1,806 55.5% 560 60.3% 1,307 44.8% First Time Voter, No 1,031 31.7% 72 7.8% 316 10.9% Acceptable ID Incomplete 204 6.7% 119 12.8% 945 32.4% Provisional Envelope Signature Match 62 8.4% 18 1.9% 102 3.5% Total Not Counted 3,253 928 2,918 Percentage 1.3 0.5 1.0 of Total Votes Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 97
  • 98. Provisional Ballot Metrics “Not Counted” 2010 2012 2014 Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage Nov. Percentage 2010 of Total Not 2012 of Total Not 2014 of Total Not Counted Counted Counted Not Registered 445 30.1% First Time Voter, No 18 1.2% Acceptable ID Incomplete 661 45.0% Provisional Envelope Signature Match 160 10.8% Total Not Counted 1,478 Percentage 0.8 of Total Votes Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 98
  • 99. Websites http://www.jocoelection.org http://my.jocopolo.com http://advance.jocoelection.org https://voter.jocoelection.org http://lwv.jocoelection.org Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 99
  • 100. Websites Facebook: Johnson County Election Office Twitter: Jocoelection Podcast: Election Updates on iTunes Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 100
  • 101. Appendix A Election Office, Relevant Statutes
  • 102. Relevant Legislative Authority 19-3419a. Salaries and car allowance of election commissioners. The election commissioners in any county shall receive a salary in an amount to be fixed by resolution of the board of county commissioners of the county. On and after January 1, 1977, the compensation so fixed shall be in an amount not less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per annum. Such salary shall be an annual salary payable in equal monthly installments. The election commissioner shall receive a car allowance in an amount to be fixed by resolution of the board of county commissioners. 19-3420. Assistant election commissioners; appointment, salary; expenses. The election commissioner shall appoint one assistant, known as assistant election commissioner, who shall receive an annual salary to be fixed by the election commissioner and shall be paid in the same manner as other county officers and employees, and in addition the election commissioner shall certify to the board of county commissioners the amount necessary for clerk hire and expense, which amount shall be allowed by the board of county commissioners of said county. The board of county commissioners shall also authorize the statutory mileage allowance provided for in K.S.A. 75-3203 for the assistants of the election commissioner, to provide and maintain means of travel within their county. In counties having a population of more than two hundred thousand (200,000) the election commissioner shall appoint two (2) assistants, known as assistant election commissioners who shall be paid as provided for in this act. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 102
  • 103. Relevant Legislative Authority 19-3424. Powers, authority and duties; ward and precinct boundaries; notices of elections; printing ballots; election contests; budget. The election commissioner, as a part of his or her official duties shall have and exercise the following powers and authority: (a) Such commissioner shall establish and fix the boundaries of wards and precincts within the county and in all cities the greater part of the population of which is located in said county. Such commissioner shall accept and file nomination and declaration papers of candidates and declarations of party affiliation. (b) Such commissioner shall give notice by publication in the official county paper, at least fifteen (15) days before the holding of any election, except as otherwise provided by law, of the time of holding such election, and the officers at that time to be chosen, and any other matters to be voted upon. (c) Such commissioner shall publish notice giving the proper party designation if required by law, the title of each office, the names and addresses of all persons seeking national and state offices and as certified to such county election officer by the secretary of state, as provided by law, and of all persons from whom nomination papers or declarations have been filed with such election officer as provided by law, giving the name and address of each, the title to such office, the day of the election, the hours during which the polls will be open and the location of the voting place in each precinct or area, and mail to all persons whose nomination or declaration papers are on file with such election officer, a copy of the first issue containing such publication notice. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 103
  • 104. Relevant Legislative Authority 19-3424 (cont). Powers, authority and duties; ward and precinct boundaries; notices of elections; printing ballots; election contests; budget. The election commissioner, as a part of his or her official duties shall have and exercise the following powers and authority: (d) Such commissioner shall have charge of the printing of the ballots for all elections to which this act applies held within the county, or held within any city, school district, township or drainage district located in said county. Such commissioner shall conduct negotiations for the letting of the contract to print such ballots and shall let the contract, with the approval of the board of county commissioners. (e) Such commissioner shall be the clerk of the court for the trial of contested elections except national and state elections, and all intentions to contest any election shall be filed with said election commissioner, and shall proceed in accordance with any laws of the state dealing with the subject. On or before July 15 of each year, the election commissioner shall certify to the board of county commissioners an itemized statement showing the amount necessary to pay the salary of the election commissioner, the deputy election commissioner and other employees in the office of the election commissioner and other expenses of said office during the next ensuing budget year and the county commissioners shall cause the same to be included in the county budget for such ensuing budget year. 19-3435. Same; how salaries and expenses paid. That the salaries and expenses of the office of the election commissioner as in this act provided, the cost of printing and distributing the ballots and all other expenses connected with county-wide elections whether primary, general or special elections, in counties having an election commissioner, shall be paid by the county. The expense of all drainage district elections shall be paid by the drainage district holding such election from the general fund of such drainage district. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 104
  • 105. Relevant Legislative Authority 19-3435a. Election commissioner; salaries and expenses of office; tax levy, use of proceeds. The board of county commissioners in any county having an election commissioner, is hereby authorized to make a tax levy in each year, in such amount as may be necessary in order to provide the necessary fund for the payment of the salaries and expenses of the office of the election commissioner and of election expenses as provided for in K.S.A. 19-3435 and to pay a portion of the principal and interest on bonds issued under the authority of K.S.A. 12-1774, and amendments thereto, by cities located in the county. Said tax levy shall be in addition to all other tax levies authorized or limited by law and shall not be subject to nor within the aggregate tax levy limit prescribed by K.S.A. 79-1947, or acts amendatory thereof. Brian D. Newby, September 8, 2011 105