Biztalk Integration, Thinking like an Integration Person Biztalk360, there are different ways to implement a BizTalk (integration) solution. The solution you choose will depend on various aspects,strategies, patterns, technical decision makings etc. Here are some of the common scenarios
•Some technologies are more expensive to integrate than others,
•Some technical issues are more difficult to solve than others, and
•Some critical situations could be solved in easy way.
It's not always possible to learn about these challenges in books or in internet. Most of the time, it comes from years of personal experience.
In this session Nino Crudele will provide a real guidance based on personal experience, referring to all topics of previous European sessions but covering the most important aspects in
BizTalk Summit 2014, London March 03-04
Brought to you by BizTalk360
3. Microsoft Integration
MVP
7 Years
Blog:
ninocrudele.me
Who am I
- Since BizTalk 2002
- 7 YEARS MVP
- Microsoft VTS
- Integrated:Sap,Siebel,AS400,
Tibco,IBM World, databases
engines and more…
- Used: HL7-EDI-RFID-SWIFT-
Rosettanet-RFID and more..
- Missions: Assessment,
Development, Health check,
Troubleshooting
6. BizTalker Evolution1
BizTalk Server
2002
BizTalk Server
2004
BizTalk Server
2006
BizTalk Server
2006 R2
BizTalk Server
2009
BizTalk Server
2010
BizTalk Server
2000
Messaging
XML tools
XLang
Deployment
Tools
XSD
EAI (partner
adapters)
Vertical B2B
VS + .NET
Messaging +
Orchestration
BRE
Routing
BAM
Scale-out
Simplified
configuration
Adapters in box
Runtime+
BAM+
EDI/AS2
RFID
WCF support
Adapter Pack
Adapter SDK
HIS 2006
BAHS
ALM Support
B2B+
RFID Mobile
Adapter Pack
2.0
Hyper-V
Support
HIS 2009
BAHS 2.0
Mapper UI
enhancements
Fine-grained
Manageability
Trading Partner
Management
Secure FTP
Cloud Connect
Updated Swift
and HIPAA
HIS 2010
BizTalk Server
2013
Hybrid Applications
Configuration Cloud-
scale ESB
Visual Studio 2013
Who is the most complicate system?
Who the most complicate accelerators?
Who the most complicte adapter?
From what could depend how much is complicate an adapter or accelerator or system? (from its features for adapter, from the structure for accelerator, from interfaces for the system)
Who is the most complicate system?
Who the most complicate accelerators?
Who the most complicte adapter?
From what could depend how much is complicate an adapter or accelerator or system? (from its features for adapter, from the structure for accelerator, from interfaces for the system)
The perception is the most important thing, all of the solution depend from this
A lot of technologies in play, more of them are common: .Net, SQL, BizTalk, XSL
We percept the technologies as a TAGs cloud, some more important than other, this is bad
The perception is the most important thing, all of the solution depend from this
A lot of technologies in play, more of them are common: .Net, SQL, BizTalk, XSL
We percept the technologies as a TAGs cloud, some more important than other, this is bad
The perception is the most important thing, all of the solution depend from this
A lot of technologies in play, more of them are common: .Net, SQL, BizTalk, XSL
We percept the technologies as a TAGs cloud, some more important than other, this is bad
The perception is the most important thing, all of the solution depend from this
A lot of technologies in play, more of them are common: .Net, SQL, BizTalk, XSL
We percept the technologies as a TAGs cloud, some more important than other, this is bad
The perception is the most important thing, all of the solution depend from this
A lot of technologies in play, more of them are common: .Net, SQL, BizTalk, XSL
We percept the technologies as a TAGs cloud, some more important than other, this is bad
The perception is the most important thing, all of the solution depend from this
A lot of technologies in play, more of them are common: .Net, SQL, BizTalk, XSL
We percept the technologies as a TAGs cloud, some more important than other, this is bad