The document discusses creating a literate environment in a Pre-K-3 classroom. It emphasizes getting to know learners through assessment, carefully selecting texts, and incorporating the interactive, critical, and response perspectives of literacy. The interactive perspective involves teaching strategic reading skills. The critical perspective encourages deeper thinking about texts. The response perspective allows personal reflection and response to reading. Together these elements support readers' and writers' literacy development.
1. Literate Environment
Analysis
Ashley Adams
Walden University
Donna Bialach
The Beginning Reader: Pre-K-3: EDUC 6706
June 17, 2012
2. A Literate Environment
• A literate environment is the classroom
atmosphere that a teacher creates to best
support readers and writers in their literacy
development.
• A literate environment includes a balance of the
following:
– Getting to know the learners through assessment
– Carefully selecting texts for use in instruction
– The three perspectives of literacy
• The Interactive Perspective
• The Critical Perspective
• The Response Perspective
3. Getting to Know Literacy
Learners, P-3
• Various cognitive and affective assessment tools can be used to learn about
the abilities, interests, and attitudes of your literacy learners.
• The Elementary Reading Attitude Survey gives data regarding a reader’s
attitude toward academic and recreational reading (McKenna & Kear, 1990).
• The Motivation to Read Profile gives an insight into the motivational levels
of readers (Gambrell, Palmer, Codling, & Mazzoni, 1996).
• Reading inventories are used to assess readers’ cognitive abilities, including
fluency, accuracy, and comprehension (Afflerbach, 2007).
• These assessment tools have helped me create a literate environment that
attends to my students’ reading interests. I have also been able to
implement activities and instructional strategies which increase readers’
motivational levels and attitudes toward academic reading such as adding
high-interest texts, implementing sustained silent reading, book talks or
literature circles, and reader’s theater (Tompkins, 2010). I have also been
able to differentiate instruction based upon the literacy needs of my
students with guided reading groups, writing and reading conferences, and
word study activities.
• These assessments can be used at the beginning of the year to get to know
your readers well, and again throughout the year to monitor their progress,
strengths, and needs as their literacy develops.
4. Selecting Texts
• A teacher must carefully select a mixture of texts found across the
literacy matrix for instruction (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008a). These
texts can either be narrative or informational, semiotic (many illustrations)
or linguistic (mostly print). Students should be exposed to a variety of
these texts, and they should be appropriate for the students’ needs.
• The explicit instruction of texts with specific structures and visual
supports such as key words, illustrations or photographs, tables of content,
subtitles, and charts help students independently navigate texts and
improve comprehension (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008c).
• Authentic texts, whether fiction or nonfiction, picture books or chapter
books, are vital for the optimal progress of our students’ literacy
development (Duke, 2004). Students should have access and many
opportunities to explore these texts in the classroom as well at home.
• Learning how to correctly select a variety of texts for instruction has
helped me improve my literate environment. I have learned to ensure that
students interact with various types of text in order to improve their
comprehension. I have also learned to choose texts which have appropriate
readability, text length, and visual supports to effectively scaffold
readers’ development.
• Explicitly teaching the elements of these texts and how to navigate them
will also have a profound effect on my students’ learning.
5. Interactive Perspective
• The interactive perspective of literacy is defined as teaching students how
to be strategic in their reading (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008e).
• This perspective includes phonics, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension
(Laureate Education, Inc., 2008d). Students learn to be metacognitive in
self-monitoring and using decoding and comprehension strategies. The goal
of the interactive perspective is to create readers who are able to
navigate texts independently and successfully.
• Attending to the interactive perspective has greatly improved my literate
environment. I carefully choose instructional strategies which enable my
students to become comfortable in taking risks in their reading and writing.
• These strategies include fluency building activities such as reader’s
theater and tea parties (Tompkins, 2010). They also include shared
reading, read alouds, and interactive writing which allow me to model my
thinking and discuss decoding and comprehension strategies with students
in an authentic context.
• As a result, my students have become more accurate decoders and
encoders, more fluent readers and writers, and more strategic thinkers.
6. The Critical Perspective
• The critical response is described as teaching students how to carefully
examine texts, including the validity of information and authors’ viewpoints
(Laureate Education, Inc., 2008e).
• This perspective encourages students to think more deeply about the
characters, themes, and issues about which they read (Laureate Education,
Inc., 2008b). Students make inferences, ask questions, and reflect upon
different perspectives.
• Attending to the critical perspective is having a profound effect on my
literate environment. Through encouraging deeper thinking, my students
are putting themselves into the stories they read and the topics they are
interested in.
• Instructional strategies which develop this perspective include grand
conversations, literature circles, open-mind portraits, and the hot seat
(Tompkins, 2010). These strategies allow students to communicate their
questions and concerns that they encounter while reading texts.
• As a result of implementing these activities, my students have become
more comfortable participating in conversations, and are more critical of
the information and points-of-view they read about.
7. The Response Perspective
• The response perspective includes giving readers and writers time to
reflect and respond to the stories they read in a variety of ways (Laureate
Education, Inc., 2008e).
• Readers’ experiences are very important to their comprehension and
interpretation of texts. This schema allows readers to make deeper
connections, share their thoughts and emotions, and grow in their
transaction, or transformation, with texts (Laureate Education, Inc.,
2008f).
• Powerful texts give students the opportunities to share how they are
affected by what they read. This is the point where learning happens.
Students make very personal connections to what they read.
• Carefully integrating the response perspective into my teaching has
improved my students’ motivation, participation, and confidence as readers.
My literate environment is now more cohesive. Instructional strategies
that I find very helpful are thinkmarks, reading response journals, reader’s
theater and dramatic skits (Tompkins, 2010).
• These activities have improved my students’ self-monitoring,
comprehension, and writing skills. My students have also become more
thoughtful readers, and are more comfortable sharing their personal
connections and emotions regarding the books they read.
8. References
Afflerbach, P. (2007). Understanding and using reading assessments, K-12. Newark, DE: International
Reading Association.
Duke, N.K. (2004). The case for informational text. Educational Leadership, 61(6), 40-44. Retrieved from
http://web.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ehost/
Gambrell, L.B., Palmer, B. M., Codling, R.M., & Mazzoni, S.A. (1996). Assessing motivation to read. The
Reading Teacher, 49(7), 518-533. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/
ehost/
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008a). Analyzing and selecting texts [Video webcast]. In The
beginning reader, preK-3. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008b). Critical perspectivve [Video webcast]. In The beginning
reader, preK-3. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008c). Informational text in the early years [Video webcast]. In
The beginning reader, preK-3. Retrieved from
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008d). Interactive perspective: strategic processing [Video
webcast]. In The beginning reader, preK-3. Retrieved from https://
class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008e). Perspectives on literacy learning [Video webcast]. In The
beginning reader, preK-3. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008f). Response perspective [Video webcast]. In The beginning
reader, preK-3. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?
McKenna, M.C., & Kear, D.J. (1990). Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers. The
Reading Teacher, 43(9), 626-639. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/
ehost/
Tompkins, G.E. (2010). Literacy for the 21st century: A balanced approach (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn &
Bacon.